Afghanistan, Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, Bangladesh, Barbados, Dominica, England, Grenada, Guyana, India, Jamaica, Namibia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Scotland, South Africa, Sri Lanka, St Kitts and Nevis, St Lucia, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago, Wales and Zimbabwe are all countries where cricket is a top 3 most popular sport and 6 different teams have won the Cricket World Cup. China is the only country in the world where table tennis is a top 3 sport and they completely dominate the global scene. Which sport is more “multinational”?😂
@@_Jay_Singh he meant multinational in the sense that there are more countries that have table tennis professionals than cricket. There are top table tennis players across more continents compared to cricket. Cricket, although an interesting sport has far less reach than table tennis and most teams usually have south asians (indians,pakistanis) playing for them rather than natives.
@@vivekn6067 West Indies, Australia, New Zealand and England all have been very competitive teams with maybe 1 starting south Asian. Despite what people think lots of non Asians play cricket in the Caribbean, British Isles and Oceania. It seems as though if Indians are good at anything, it is immediately discounted. You are seeing it in chess recently too
@@_Jay_Singh exactly. Australia, new zealand, and the caribbean were all british colonies (commonwealth nations). Obviously cricket will be more popular in those countries. Take a look at the cricket teams of France, Germany, Spain or even other European countries. All of their players are of either indian or pakistani heritage. South Asia is a powerhouse of cricket, but that does not make cricket multinational. Your example of chess is correct, you dont see Indians playing chess for Germany, France. There are natives in those countries who play the game at a high level. Thus, we can consider it multinational as more countries have professionals who actually play the game. Cricket, has probably 10-12 nations at most who actually play in official icc tournaments and the same teams automatically qualify every new tournament. Table tennis has a way more diverse playing field with countries from Asia, Europe, North America, and even Africa who play the game at a high level.
@@vivekn6067 It is true that table tennis is more multinational in overall participation. But cricket is more multinational at top level competition. Multiple teams go into the cricket World Cup with realistic chances of winning. (England, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, India and Pakistan recently). But top level table tennis competitions are completely dominated by China
Which Lee Sang Su will show up today? The brilliant player who links his shots so quickly or the one who is inconsistent, rushes and misses? We got mostly the good one here.
World class cameras,world class stadium ,world class players ,but... Pathetic camera angle ! Just ruins the entire match ,and so much lack of common sense on part of camera man ....its astonishing!!
India's finest player couldn't stand against international quality player..It's painfull to see sarath to lose critical matches in every important tournament. India should promote this TT sports at school level like china, to get more prodigies.
Sharad is both lazy and lousy player. No variety in serves. He has neither good forehand nor backhand. No quick footwork also. What do you expect from a 😮42-year-old player? What has he done so far India since 2004 Olympics? Just pleasure trips to Olympics? And for his greatness Sharad was made the flagbearer for India when Indian squad had such star as Neeraj Choora. Waste of government money. Who knows who is his Godfather in the government? I think the government should disband the present table tennis federation of India for sending 9 officials to accompany 6 players at Paris as if there were medals for officials also.
Being Prosper in sports other than cricket is not easy, support him INDIA. He is competing in multinational sport not like between two nations
Afghanistan, Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, Bangladesh, Barbados, Dominica, England, Grenada, Guyana, India, Jamaica, Namibia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Scotland, South Africa, Sri Lanka, St Kitts and Nevis, St Lucia, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago, Wales and Zimbabwe are all countries where cricket is a top 3 most popular sport and 6 different teams have won the Cricket World Cup. China is the only country in the world where table tennis is a top 3 sport and they completely dominate the global scene. Which sport is more “multinational”?😂
@@_Jay_Singh he meant multinational in the sense that there are more countries that have table tennis professionals than cricket. There are top table tennis players across more continents compared to cricket. Cricket, although an interesting sport has far less reach than table tennis and most teams usually have south asians (indians,pakistanis) playing for them rather than natives.
@@vivekn6067 West Indies, Australia, New Zealand and England all have been very competitive teams with maybe 1 starting south Asian. Despite what people think lots of non Asians play cricket in the Caribbean, British Isles and Oceania. It seems as though if Indians are good at anything, it is immediately discounted. You are seeing it in chess recently too
@@_Jay_Singh exactly. Australia, new zealand, and the caribbean were all british colonies (commonwealth nations). Obviously cricket will be more popular in those countries. Take a look at the cricket teams of France, Germany, Spain or even other European countries. All of their players are of either indian or pakistani heritage. South Asia is a powerhouse of cricket, but that does not make cricket multinational. Your example of chess is correct, you dont see Indians playing chess for Germany, France. There are natives in those countries who play the game at a high level. Thus, we can consider it multinational as more countries have professionals who actually play the game. Cricket, has probably 10-12 nations at most who actually play in official icc tournaments and the same teams automatically qualify every new tournament. Table tennis has a way more diverse playing field with countries from Asia, Europe, North America, and even Africa who play the game at a high level.
@@vivekn6067 It is true that table tennis is more multinational in overall participation. But cricket is more multinational at top level competition. Multiple teams go into the cricket World Cup with realistic chances of winning. (England, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, India and Pakistan recently). But top level table tennis competitions are completely dominated by China
Sharath kamal is brilliant ❤
Which Lee Sang Su will show up today? The brilliant player who links his shots so quickly or the one who is inconsistent, rushes and misses? We got mostly the good one here.
The latter Lee sangsu, of course!
World class cameras,world class stadium ,world class players ,but...
Pathetic camera angle !
Just ruins the entire match ,and so much lack of common sense on part of camera man ....its astonishing!!
True pathetic camera angel .
India's finest player couldn't stand against international quality player..It's painfull to see sarath to lose critical matches in every important tournament.
India should promote this TT sports at school level like china, to get more prodigies.
Looks like Sharath's service is illegal, he didn't remove free hand at all.
Sharad is both lazy and lousy player. No variety in serves. He has neither good forehand nor backhand. No quick footwork also. What do you expect from a 😮42-year-old player? What has he done so far India since 2004 Olympics? Just pleasure trips to Olympics? And for his greatness Sharad was made the flagbearer for India when Indian squad had such star as Neeraj Choora. Waste of government money. Who knows who is his Godfather in the government? I think the government should disband the present table tennis federation of India for sending 9 officials to accompany 6 players at Paris as if there were medals for officials also.
Worst camera angle
Time for retirement
Still India players are don't know what is call T.T at this time .... And all time sharath manner is very bad..
he can not deserve Arjuna award ..👈
U first go and learn English and what do u know about tt
Sarath is a lazy player. He does not move.
He's nearly 40
@@gauravsaimaddipati8356 it’s not like that. I always seen him like that. MA long is also old.
He should retire; dont see any enthusiasm in him to play; indeed bery lazy shots and not well thought through
No bro … he is not … it is we 1.4 billion and nobody has come near to his class in 20 years ?
He could have been a lot better player if he didn't had such a lazy playing style
bad manner india
🤔