Ultra low-head hydropower in irrigation canals for Pakistan

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 июл 2020
  • University of Southampton Civil Engineering students, supervised by Dr Gerald Muller, have designed a water wheel to be used for electricity generation in the irrigation canals of Pakistan.

Комментарии • 35

  • @mldee1943
    @mldee1943 2 года назад +12

    Please increase your audio volume to a normal level

    • @geraldmueller1
      @geraldmueller1 2 года назад

      i just set it at around 70%, works ok for me

    • @soundmindtv2911
      @soundmindtv2911 Год назад

      Yes. When the ads hit, RIP eardrums if you're wearing earbuds 😩

  • @SenorTucano
    @SenorTucano 4 месяца назад

    Did it work?

  • @tajdar
    @tajdar 7 месяцев назад

    Hi, I'm wondering if the technical specs of this design are available for a DIY installation? I'd be curious to know more and work with the team on a pilot implementation of this turbine.

  • @africanelectron751
    @africanelectron751 Год назад +1

    Don't really see the advantage of 4 little wheels instead of one big shaft seems a bit inefficient.

    • @geraldmueller1
      @geraldmueller1 Год назад +1

      the resaons are the costs for the gearbox., which usually amounts to 35-40% of the total cost f the installation. Even a 10 kW gearbox with the approrpriste torque, gear ratio and lifespan costs around 15k Euros, so the small wheels give a big costa dvantage

  • @saifullahfateh8001
    @saifullahfateh8001 3 года назад +2

    I wanna generate electricity on canal , there is a big canal falls huge water from 10 feet height with a lot of potential energy , I need your help.
    Guide me

    • @geraldmueller1
      @geraldmueller1 Год назад

      sorry for repying so late, but if you send me a picture then i may be able to think about your problem

  • @patricksmyth2506
    @patricksmyth2506 Год назад

    is this available to purchase? (UK)

  • @ijazali8047
    @ijazali8047 2 года назад +1

    I need your help .
    I hope you can contact again.
    Tell me your company name from Canada

  • @khaledissa9818
    @khaledissa9818 Год назад

    مرحباً جميعاً،،من فضلكم ما المعادله او (القانون الحسابي )الذي يمكنني من حساب القوه الناتجه عن تدفق 250غالون ماء بالدقيقه من ارتفاع 5اقدام ،،،كم حصان قوه تعادل،،،؟ 2)اذا كان هدفي رفع بعض الماء لمستوى اعلى من مستوى جريانها الطبيعي ،،،مثلاً ،،هل القوه الناتجه عن تدفق 250غالون من ارتفاع 5اقدام كافيه لرفع 100غالون لارتفاع 10 اقدام ،،،؟ وشكراً جزيلاً

  • @thebeautifulones5436
    @thebeautifulones5436 Год назад +1

    Irrigation canals only flow for part of the year.

    • @geraldmueller1
      @geraldmueller1 Год назад +1

      yes, bt that depends. The canals in PK flow for 11 months, some canals in France only for five

    • @geraldmueller1
      @geraldmueller1 Год назад +1

      In PK they flow for 11 months, in other coutries sometimes only 4. That needs to be taken into account, But rmemeber, the flow volume in the canals does not vary as much as the flow in rofers by a large factor. so pwoer produciton is possible for the time when the cnal flows. Then it is a matter of how much the installation costs, and how much power is produced.

  • @intheshell35ify
    @intheshell35ify 2 года назад +1

    Spoiler... there is a pump upstream providing the water. 🤭

    • @geraldmueller1
      @geraldmueller1 2 года назад +1

      as far as i know, the system is driven by gravity only. In any case, the available hydropower so far was wasted and with a waterwheel we can recover that energy..

    • @intheshell35ify
      @intheshell35ify 2 года назад +1

      @@geraldmueller1 I was being sarcastic. But as an aside, no..the gravitational potential energy stored in the water is not "all wasted". A great deal of it is used to actually move the water across the landscape in a predictable way. No such thing as free energy.

  • @kilx81
    @kilx81 Год назад +1

    I don't think friction rollers will stand the test of time in the wild 😜

    • @guygillmore2970
      @guygillmore2970 Год назад

      Hmmm, I’m thinking you are right. I was hoping he was going to say direct drive magnets built into the wheel but thinking he was going to say V belt drives. Friction drive on a wet surface extracting 9kW from 90rpm….

    • @kilx81
      @kilx81 Год назад

      @@guygillmore2970in any environment exposure.
      Dust, water, algae water will get into it.
      I'd just opt for an enclosed gear solution. Make it durable and long lasting.
      When it breaks down nobody will care.

    • @geraldmueller1
      @geraldmueller1 Год назад

      they are working on railways.. and even if the whel have to be replaced, the costs are small compared to a gearbox

    • @geraldmueller1
      @geraldmueller1 Год назад

      @@guygillmore2970 the numbers say that it is possible. The friciton factor for wet steel on steel contact is 0.3, thats well known from railway design. This alows for sufficient force transfer

    • @kilx81
      @kilx81 Год назад

      @@geraldmueller1there are different types og gearboxes and different qualities.
      However a rail system doesn't sound cheap vs gears.
      Unless so crude that i will start questioning quality and performance.
      Gears aren't really that expensive in themselves unless you go for custom options.
      Just standard options make them fit with minimum custom design.
      I mean this sounds more like a diy-project for the guy who wants who wants to do everything from scratch.
      Not really ambitious enough.

  • @assassinlexx1993
    @assassinlexx1993 Год назад

    The friction losts will make it a poor design.
    You must use full drop of elevation.
    With a direct drive to a DC generator. To a solid state converter to ac.
    Low flow plus small elevation equals low output.
    Paddle wheel has never worked.
    Think vertical not horizontal shaft.

    • @geraldmueller1
      @geraldmueller1 Год назад

      The friction loss factor in a railway wheel is 0.01. For our case, with a weight of the wheel of 1500 kg / 15 kN and a tangential wheel speed of 3 m/s the loss is 0.45 kW for a power out of 9 kW. I think that friction losses are acceptable when compared with gearbox costs.

    • @ZAR-2225
      @ZAR-2225 2 месяца назад

      @@geraldmueller1 when you say 9kw is that per day?

  • @usmanshahid7529
    @usmanshahid7529 Год назад +1

    Thank u sir, but our politions will not do anything good for country.

    • @alternativgazdasag3344
      @alternativgazdasag3344 Год назад

      Learn organise yourself: educate, look for effective actions and thinking. Be creative: Adopt, adapt, improve.

  • @ijazali8047
    @ijazali8047 2 года назад +1

    Your officer form Lahore Pakistan contact me.
    Thanks for contact me.

  • @hydrocraft.international
    @hydrocraft.international 6 месяцев назад

    We are manufacturing these turbines in pakistan so u can contact us