I published around 40 images in May, then i was waiting the review and many of them were accepted in the end of July, then in August i got 1 download and it gave me 0.98$. In that case u should wait and be patient about it. Even if i got 1 dollar, it would give to me motivation. So if someone think he can do, just do it. And thanks for video. Deserved like ❤
Thank you for very cool and informative video as always! I started to upload ai images on adobe stock and freepic over a month ago. On adobe they are still pending in review ofc :D On freepic however review is way faster but confusing at times. Some of my uploads were reviewed less than in hour and some pending review already second month ( so up to 20 days doesn't seem to be accurate). Atm I have on freepic 364 images (249 pending review still) and 31 downloads. Commission rate per image is 0,049. So I made about 2 euro so far. But platform is very nice and upload friendly with good traffic (stuff that I sold is fun, demonic pics and so on) so the more assets you have the more you can make. I def gonna keep uploading on this one! Would be exciting to see a video about how to make a portfolio and start to sell on Displate (they accept ai images)!
Oh and I also had quality issues on my first uploads ( I used free upscalers online). Now I'm upscaling in photoshop (4-6 mp is totally cool for stock and manual adjustments if needed) while saving up for topaz. All are passing quality standards
How about trying producing Samsung Themes? That is a bit of a higher level than just pooping out AI images but I can't find anyone promoting it as a source of income. But it looks interesting because you can reach millions of potential customers. Related to this I am going to take a look at some of your suggestions, especially Zedge.
Hey there, digital art fam! Don't now where to sell you Ai art and which platform is better? No problem we gonna fix it! So grab a cup of coffee and let's dive into the world of AI art sales! ✅ Mobvoi SandStone Contest: bit.ly/45hR3ah ⌚ Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 5: bit.ly/3OMO18O - Creative Market Sing Up Link: creativemarket.com/sell - Zedge Sing Up Link: marketplace.zedge.net/ - Freepik Sing Up Link: contributor.freepik.com?/ - Artstation Sing Up Link: magazine.artstation.com/author/artstation-contributor/ - AdobeStock Sing Up Link: contributor.stock.adobe.com/ My Artstation Guide: ruclips.net/video/ujwjBOfT1wk/видео.html My AdobeStock Guide:ruclips.net/video/TwwcmVCJT94/видео.html How To Earn On AdobeStock: ruclips.net/video/K7vGH8ZlPS8/видео.html 🥤 Buy Me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/still17 📷 Follow me on Instagram: instagram.com/still17wrld/ 🎨 My ArtStation Profile: www.artstation.com/stillxvii/store 🐥 Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/still17wrld 🖼 My Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/stillxvii/ 🎵 My Music Project: linktr.ee/still17
My question to you is who owns this AI art and what gives people right to sell them this can be a problem not knowing who really owns this images in a long run and people will eventually get sued
Thank you! Great video I started uploading on adobe stock two weeks ago already have 51 picture in review and like 100 ready to sumbit 😭😭 how long did it take you to get approved?
Great video. Thank you! 👍 How much does it cost you to be on these platforms because of any subs? Because I'm paying more than that monthly on Midjourney (which is worth it). But if a realistic income is less than the total amount you're paying for all the platforms, then, well...
@@jarenfromvenus There is a difference. Lets say you commission someone to draw something for you. You can not claim to be the artist. In reality a lot of things use AI. the fill tool in drawing programs is AI. Video games use AI for enemy movements etc. But there is a big difference between using AI for smaller things vs just having an AI do everything. With the commission example above using a program like Dall e to create AI art work means that Dall e is the artist and your not since in this scenario your not doing any of the work. One might argue that you could use Ai art to generate pictures for a book and for an average person who can't draw this could be argued similar to hiring an illustrator. Though it is really murky. Really AI is a very complex thing. when I made my initial comment it was mostly complain about AI replacing the entire creative process which is what many people want to use it for. Honestly I would take a poorly made drawing any day of the week over an AI generated drawing because I least I know that the person who made that is trying and trying is really the first step at getting better then anything. And when I talk about artist I don't mean those ones who get payed a billion dollars to ducktape a banana to a wall I mean smaller artists who hone in on their craft or really anyone who wants to better themselves and is willing to try new things. This is really more of a brain dump then an argument.
If you didn't read all of that that's fine because I did rant a bit long. But really a point I want to highlight I forgot to include is that AI art often steals art from other artists and pieces them together. You can argue that many artists use inspiration from other artists. But there's a difference between getting inspiration and just tracing over someone else work not in the public domain without permission and claiming it to be your 100 percent original art work without credit the original artist.
@@tempchannel8111AI will replace a lot of other jobs in the future, not just art.. So everyone who will lose their jobs because of AI will be just as disappointed as the human artists and writers etc are these days. And that's okay. I get it. And no offense, but the ones who are busy writing comments about for example how AI art is not real art, are missing their opportunity with AI. They are just wasting their time because most people will not listen anyways.. I was one who was thinking the exact same thing in the beginning, and I had to rethink, because many of them will not have a way to make an income in a few years because AI will, in most cases have taken over their jobs. I'm not trying to trigger or fight you or anyone else.. All I'm saying is that AI is already here, and it's most likely here to stay. Whether we like it or not. No matter what people tell each other about how AI art, AI music, AI books, AI everything aren't real art, or real music. (Ai art is still art, AI books are still books and AI music is still music, it's not human made or human written, but of course it's still something. And oftentimes it's an art just to write a prompt that will give good enough images) People using AI are not trying to take away real artists opportunities, most of them are simply trying to secure their own future. Btw, in 20 or 30 years, human made and hand painted art will probably be worth a lot of money.. The world is changing, and we have to adapt to survive in the new world
I have this thought that they are using all of us to improve their AI and all these images are just going to sit unapproved because they won't need us anymore to create this graphic art. Then they will have AI produce the photos for their paying customers and delete all the inferior ones that we submitted for approval. Afterall the AI is getting better and better. We are telling it what is good and what isn't and thier algorithms are tracking what we've downloaded and how we improved it. We are being duped.
1:30 is when the video actually starts btw...
I published around 40 images in May, then i was waiting the review and many of them were accepted in the end of July, then in August i got 1 download and it gave me 0.98$. In that case u should wait and be patient about it. Even if i got 1 dollar, it would give to me motivation. So if someone think he can do, just do it. And thanks for video. Deserved like ❤
Just upload and wait bro it takes some time🙏🏻 thank you for support ❤️
Your explaining style is like you are rapping wow
Thank you for very cool and informative video as always! I started to upload ai images on adobe stock and freepic over a month ago. On adobe they are still pending in review ofc :D On freepic however review is way faster but confusing at times. Some of my uploads were reviewed less than in hour and some pending review already second month ( so up to 20 days doesn't seem to be accurate). Atm I have on freepic 364 images (249 pending review still) and 31 downloads. Commission rate per image is 0,049. So I made about 2 euro so far. But platform is very nice and upload friendly with good traffic (stuff that I sold is fun, demonic pics and so on) so the more assets you have the more you can make. I def gonna keep uploading on this one! Would be exciting to see a video about how to make a portfolio and start to sell on Displate (they accept ai images)!
Oh and I also had quality issues on my first uploads ( I used free upscalers online). Now I'm upscaling in photoshop (4-6 mp is totally cool for stock and manual adjustments if needed) while saving up for topaz. All are passing quality standards
Yeah I will Tryna to push this platform too. I think this is rly nice place to sell commercial stuff for holidays and so on
How about trying producing Samsung Themes? That is a bit of a higher level than just pooping out AI images but I can't find anyone promoting it as a source of income. But it looks interesting because you can reach millions of potential customers.
Related to this I am going to take a look at some of your suggestions, especially Zedge.
Not bad idea
Hey there, digital art fam! Don't now where to sell you Ai art and which platform is better? No problem we gonna fix it! So grab a cup of coffee and let's dive into the world of AI art sales!
✅ Mobvoi SandStone Contest: bit.ly/45hR3ah
⌚ Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 5: bit.ly/3OMO18O
- Creative Market Sing Up Link: creativemarket.com/sell
- Zedge Sing Up Link: marketplace.zedge.net/
- Freepik Sing Up Link: contributor.freepik.com?/
- Artstation Sing Up Link: magazine.artstation.com/author/artstation-contributor/
- AdobeStock Sing Up Link: contributor.stock.adobe.com/
My Artstation Guide: ruclips.net/video/ujwjBOfT1wk/видео.html
My AdobeStock Guide:ruclips.net/video/TwwcmVCJT94/видео.html
How To Earn On AdobeStock: ruclips.net/video/K7vGH8ZlPS8/видео.html
🥤 Buy Me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/still17
📷 Follow me on Instagram: instagram.com/still17wrld/
🎨 My ArtStation Profile: www.artstation.com/stillxvii/store
🐥 Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/still17wrld
🖼 My Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/stillxvii/
🎵 My Music Project: linktr.ee/still17
Seems like Adobe is rejecting everything now, because most AI images have artifacts.
My question to you is who owns this AI art and what gives people right to sell them this can be a problem not knowing who really owns this images in a long run and people will eventually get sued
Bro Can you make a video about creating a bot that will uploads the bunch of images to the stock website automatically..... :(
Yo bro that gon be a lon loong video Xd
@@RawAndRealStill17 Post as much as possible bruh 🙏
Thank you! Great video
I started uploading on adobe stock two weeks ago already have 51 picture in review and like 100 ready to sumbit 😭😭 how long did it take you to get approved?
Like I said in the video - 2 months :(
U just need to download one time per week, then u will be okay. But it depends on your aims 😊just believe it
@nar1708 bro does your upload get approval?
@@aawaizali4902 hi, yes 43 files have been approved, I have more in review. But only 2 sales, freepik is better for me
I uploaded 20 images, and I got 1 download (0.88$)
On Adobe Stock?
yes@@RawAndRealStill17
Hi, thanks for the video. Does Freepik have any csv format for uploading images in bulk?
Idk bro you can chak it out
I still cant even decide between signing up for services individually or trying something like wirestock
Wirestock is working 100%! but you can upload stuff in the both ways and test all the oportunities for your content.
A great video! If it's ok to ask, how many files/photos have you uploaded on Adobe stock? Thank you
10 - 20 every week tight now. When i hust started i uploaded 25 dif images every day for a month :)
@@RawAndRealStill17 Thank you! Keep making this content fam 🙌
Thank you! I will @@sooool4716
I struggle with writing keywords title description. Do you know any ai tool that will help me for that. Thank...
Contact me
Where Is Part #1 Guys ?
Will it take 2months review time for each post in adobe stock ??
yeah. especialy for ai stuff :(
Great video. Thank you! 👍 How much does it cost you to be on these platforms because of any subs? Because I'm paying more than that monthly on Midjourney (which is worth it). But if a realistic income is less than the total amount you're paying for all the platforms, then, well...
It costs nothing 👌🏼😏
😍
Бро, ты русский?
Here is your daily reminder that Ai art will never be real art.
Even most real art don't sell
Any creative work is art. Get over it.
@@jarenfromvenus There is a difference. Lets say you commission someone to draw something for you. You can not claim to be the artist. In reality a lot of things use AI. the fill tool in drawing programs is AI. Video games use AI for enemy movements etc. But there is a big difference between using AI for smaller things vs just having an AI do everything. With the commission example above using a program like Dall e to create AI art work means that Dall e is the artist and your not since in this scenario your not doing any of the work. One might argue that you could use Ai art to generate pictures for a book and for an average person who can't draw this could be argued similar to hiring an illustrator. Though it is really murky. Really AI is a very complex thing. when I made my initial comment it was mostly complain about AI replacing the entire creative process which is what many people want to use it for. Honestly I would take a poorly made drawing any day of the week over an AI generated drawing because I least I know that the person who made that is trying and trying is really the first step at getting better then anything. And when I talk about artist I don't mean those ones who get payed a billion dollars to ducktape a banana to a wall I mean smaller artists who hone in on their craft or really anyone who wants to better themselves and is willing to try new things. This is really more of a brain dump then an argument.
If you didn't read all of that that's fine because I did rant a bit long. But really a point I want to highlight I forgot to include is that AI art often steals art from other artists and pieces them together. You can argue that many artists use inspiration from other artists. But there's a difference between getting inspiration and just tracing over someone else work not in the public domain without permission and claiming it to be your 100 percent original art work without credit the original artist.
@@tempchannel8111AI will replace a lot of other jobs in the future, not just art.. So everyone who will lose their jobs because of AI will be just as disappointed as the human artists and writers etc are these days. And that's okay. I get it.
And no offense, but the ones who are busy writing comments about for example how AI art is not real art, are missing their opportunity with AI. They are just wasting their time because most people will not listen anyways.. I was one who was thinking the exact same thing in the beginning, and I had to rethink, because many of them will not have a way to make an income in a few years because AI will, in most cases have taken over their jobs.
I'm not trying to trigger or fight you or anyone else..
All I'm saying is that AI is already here, and it's most likely here to stay. Whether we like it or not. No matter what people tell each other about how AI art, AI music, AI books, AI everything aren't real art, or real music. (Ai art is still art, AI books are still books and AI music is still music, it's not human made or human written, but of course it's still something. And oftentimes it's an art just to write a prompt that will give good enough images)
People using AI are not trying to take away real artists opportunities, most of them are simply trying to secure their own future. Btw, in 20 or 30 years, human made and hand painted art will probably be worth a lot of money..
The world is changing, and we have to adapt to survive in the new world
bro my generated AI images just got rejected now.
I have this thought that they are using all of us to improve their AI and all these images are just going to sit unapproved because they won't need us anymore to create this graphic art. Then they will have AI produce the photos for their paying customers and delete all the inferior ones that we submitted for approval. Afterall the AI is getting better and better. We are telling it what is good and what isn't and thier algorithms are tracking what we've downloaded and how we improved it. We are being duped.
I haven't thought about that.. that's true🤔 maybe it's better to sell it on our own website then.. We would earn more that way too🙃 Thanks 🙏🏽