In near future i will post on some print-on-demand stats hopefully. This can be really good side hustle if you know what your doing! Read the written version here sagerunner.net/discover-ai-friendly-stock-photo-sites-your-ultimate-guide/
Do you use Adobe Firefly or any other image generation tool? My Bing AI and Leonardo AI images were rejected due to quality, even though I upscaled them for Adobe stock
@@mrhristv it is 100% proof of concept that you can submit and then generate revenue. There are people who make more than this who constantly upload, which i don't do.
Who in their right mind would ever pay for an AI generated image? Unless they were tricked into buying it thinking it was made by an artist. AI images are public domain.
Nobody. You will spend hours uploading images that nobody even looks at. Then you will complain and be told that you can upgrade your account so people see yours first. If you are stupid enough you will pay to upgrade and still sell nothing. The only way to make any money is to run a website that charges a fee to upload and sell. There are enough gullible people who have watched youtube videos and convinced themselves it is easy money so they will pay a one off fee as long as it is not too much. But there are two problems with that idea. 1. You have to be very good at making websites and 2. You have to promote your site which usually means paying Google to bump it up the listings. The problem with that is there are only ten sites on each page of search results and nobody looks beyond the first page so no matter what Google promise you they can only give ten people a place on the first page and the cost of getting that pole position will be an insane amount of money. The whole thing is a scam.
Not really. Many AI models today, like Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, and Dream AI (and many others), are trained on licensed images. With AI, you can also create artwork based on your draft, whether it’s a manual drawing, digital painting, or raw 3D render. So, the boundaries have become blurred. I make over USD600 a month now through AI-generated images, both via subscriptions and commissions. I always make it clear to my clients that I use AI in my workflow - I never tricked anyone into thinking otherwise.
@@Mr.A.Tatlock Almost all major stock photo platforms now accept AI images. Do you think these companies would invest time in verifying and hosting images if they didn’t think they’d sell? It’s true there’s no easy money. Even with AI, you still need a solid work ethic to earn enough to make ends meet. But saying people can’t sell AI images isn’t accurate either.
In near future i will post on some print-on-demand stats hopefully. This can be really good side hustle if you know what your doing! Read the written version here sagerunner.net/discover-ai-friendly-stock-photo-sites-your-ultimate-guide/
Do you use Adobe Firefly or any other image generation tool? My Bing AI and Leonardo AI images were rejected due to quality, even though I upscaled them for Adobe stock
Midjourney. I Recommend program called "upscayl" this tool keeps quality high or increases it
Can you make a video on Adobe Firefly? I think it’s good to explore! Also, check if AI images created with Firefly get accepted by Adobe Stock
@@moeezahmad1371 yeah i probably should do updated video on firefly. I will try their images to test it out
Can I post the images I publish on adobe stock later on wirestock?.....
very good question, i would say yes you can.
Zedge is worth to start now ?
sure, i made most amount of money with it.
This dude made 11 dollars and decided that its a good idea to make a tutorial about it lol
are you retarded? its a proof of concept.
@@oprelia-ai No it's not. You are not well educated and you don't have experience. You are here just because of the views.
@@mrhristv it is 100% proof of concept that you can submit and then generate revenue. There are people who make more than this who constantly upload, which i don't do.
Who in their right mind would ever pay for an AI generated image? Unless they were tricked into buying it thinking it was made by an artist. AI images are public domain.
That's not legally true, if you are creating AI images from licensed images its a different ball game.
people who make article
Nobody. You will spend hours uploading images that nobody even looks at. Then you will complain and be told that you can upgrade your account so people see yours first. If you are stupid enough you will pay to upgrade and still sell nothing. The only way to make any money is to run a website that charges a fee to upload and sell. There are enough gullible people who have watched youtube videos and convinced themselves it is easy money so they will pay a one off fee as long as it is not too much. But there are two problems with that idea. 1. You have to be very good at making websites and 2. You have to promote your site which usually means paying Google to bump it up the listings. The problem with that is there are only ten sites on each page of search results and nobody looks beyond the first page so no matter what Google promise you they can only give ten people a place on the first page and the cost of getting that pole position will be an insane amount of money. The whole thing is a scam.
Not really. Many AI models today, like Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, and Dream AI (and many others), are trained on licensed images.
With AI, you can also create artwork based on your draft, whether it’s a manual drawing, digital painting, or raw 3D render. So, the boundaries have become blurred.
I make over USD600 a month now through AI-generated images, both via subscriptions and commissions. I always make it clear to my clients that I use AI in my workflow - I never tricked anyone into thinking otherwise.
@@Mr.A.Tatlock Almost all major stock photo platforms now accept AI images. Do you think these companies would invest time in verifying and hosting images if they didn’t think they’d sell?
It’s true there’s no easy money. Even with AI, you still need a solid work ethic to earn enough to make ends meet. But saying people can’t sell AI images isn’t accurate either.