Something I think you left out is the barrel/handguard compatibility. The OG Rattler was proprietary in its operating system and handguard. The Rattler LT is updated to be compatible with all other models of Spear LT.
And for anyone wanting more info, this means you can't take a Virtus(or Spear LT) handguard and just throw it on an OG Rattler upper. You'd be left with an open gap in your top rail. Trying to add a longer barrel to your OG Rattler will force you to get a Virtus or Spear LT BCG since the operating rods are also different lengths. So, anyone with an OG Rattler has to go through a lot more steps to convert their gun to a longer barrel version. The new LT Rattler is essentially just the Tac Ops version of the Gen2 MCX without the SD handguard, and this change just makes the new Rattler more compatible/modular.
Two is one, One is none. At least that's the excuse I'm giving myself to purchase the Rattler LT. I also have an original rattler and love just about everything about it. I like the new receiver features on the new MCX/ Spear rifles so I appreciate them being added to the Rattler LT. Also the compatibility with the other LT models is kind of cool in my opinion. I found myself wanting that with the original Rattler because of the pistol brace fiasco.
I now own more sig spears than ar15's. The best way to take off the muzzle device is buying a Gieselle reaction rod. Grinding off the 1 and 3 o'clock lugs. This will allow it to fit into the mcx/spear series of rifles just like it was made for it. The rod is still able to be used with AR15's. Yeah, it cost about 100 bucks for the reaction rod but the grinding off of the lugs doesn't make it mcx/spear specific, so I say it's a no brainer for those who own both platforms.
Very well done video, my favorite gun is probably my OG Rattler with the 5 inch barrel, I don’t chase women so I’m good sacrificing the extra inch 😂 #SizeMatters
I have the 5.5 version and I like it better because it fits the smaller Virtus BP . The extra inch and suppressor FH wouldn't let it fit. I think the actual weight is about the same for both.
FYI: I did boil water then took it off the stove and let the muzzle set in the hot water for 1 hour. However, when I got my muzzle device off on the rattler LT I saw no indication of rocksett. I believe the taper is just really solid and they crank it down at the factory. Easiest way is to remove barrel and put in vise against the sides of the gas block. Use a bit of heat/torch evenly and then use a crescent wrench. Went pretty easy if you have a solid vise and some heat. It did take a few heating cycles with me trying to loosen in between heating.
Someone from Sig (I'm in NH not far from their main store) told me they don't use Rocksett. People think Sig does because they are on there so incredibly tight.
increasing the barrell length on the new rattler is an admission from sig that 5.5 is too short even for the 300blk. disapoointing but lets rather have that +1 inch if needed than not.
@@echofoxtrotwhiskey1595 True. True. Still there are significantly lighter platforms for this barrel length and caliber. I'm being picky I suppose. I really want to see more mainstream companies using better materials liked forged magnesium receivers, titanium small parts, and carbon fiber furniture though. Sure it's expensive now, but if it begins to be manufactured at scale, it won't be expensive forever. Then the whole industry is propelled forward. This isn't even considering the untapped advancements in cartridge technology that is just waiting to be used by mainstream firearms manufacturers at large. That could REALLY propel firearms tech forward. Smaller, lighter guns with lighter ammo that has the same effect as current full size MSRs.
Oh, and by the way, it really DOES fit inside a backpack perfectly. We have no restrictions in my state, so when I show up to the range ppl always compliment when it’s unzipped and pulled out nonchalant.
Holy jeeeeSUS.... and dip my milk in cookies. You got a permit for that fully-auto-finger. ( FAF ) my guy? Lol Also... i have no idea what the heck i just said 😂🤦🏻♂️
Factory sig three prong muzzle device is not difficult to remove on 300 blk rattler. Clamp the barrel assembly in a a vice and It will come right off with a wrench and a bit of leverage. Only on the 5.56 rattler barrel is the muzzle device really stuck on, because it is attached at the factory with Rokset thread glue because it is not supposed to be removed because sig does not recommend people run that short of a 5.56 barrel suppressed.
My main interest in comparing the two lies in it's ability to effectively manage gas with suppressed 300 blk and more importantly it's ability to switch between subs and supers on the fly. After shooting subs does the gas need to be togled when loading a magazine of supers or have they found a middle ground in their 2 stage gas setting. Beyond that, the 300 blk Rattlers true competitor, in my eyes, is the CMMG Dissent and it appears to handle gas, both sub and super, like a pro. However, I have yet to find a true and full comparison of both platforms and more specifically their gas management and how functional it is to toggle them during use or if it's needed. Thanks for covering the cosmetic fluff though, the Sig website doesn't seem to care enough about it's civilian clients to offer much or any information on the subject.
I wondered the same thing but can it really be the ammo? Running subs without suppressor and on high gas setting the og doesn't push bolt back enough to allow correct feeding.
I think the lt is a major upgrade because if the weight saving, trigger (plus you can use any trigger now), and more mlok points They should have gone with a 7” barrel, I think that’s the sweet spot for 300 black as a do all cqb system
I’d buy the SIG LT and Rattler LT if they offered with a slower twist. I prefer to shoot the zippy supersonic 300’s and the 1:5 twist is way too fast. Great for subs and suppression but not 110-125 gr.
how so? the rotational energy difference in supers is SUBSTANIAL having the faster barrel. The people who developed the round put it in all their weapons as does sig. 1:5 is what all 300blk barrels should be.
@@mattrogers6237 110 gr bullets in a 9” barrel run about 2150 fps. With 1:5 fast twist at that velocity, excessive bullet rpm and bullet jacket separation becomes a problem. Bullet rpm for the aforementioned is in the RED at nearly 310,000 rpm..entering solid bullet territory. David Silver, the R&D Chief at AAC that developed the 300 blackout found the most versatile barrel twist for supers and subs to be 1:7 and 1:8..that was the design goal of 300 BO to be capable of doing both. SIG focused on maximizing subs for suppression in the Spear LT hence the 1:5, but to the detriment of supers. If you review Daniel Defense, LWRC, LMT and most other manufacturer offerings, they use 1:7 NOT 1:5. 1:5 is not what AAC intended as you stated. 1:5 is specialized for subs.
110 gr bullets reach about 2,150 fps out of a 9” barrel. At this velocity and a 1:5 twist, excessive bullet rpm and potential for jacket separation is a possibility. Bullet rpm for the aforementioned is about 310,000 rpm. That’s in the RED, where not all jacketed bullet designs will stay together. David Silver, the AAC R&D Chief that developed the 300 BO, found the most versatile twist for subs and supers is 1:7 and 1:8. The design goal of the cartridge was to be able to shoot both. SIG chose to optimize the Spear LT 300 BO for subs and sound suppression by choosing 1:5, and to the detriment of lightweight supers. If you review manufacturer offerings from LWRC, Daniel Defense, LMT, BCM and others they all use 1:7. 1:5 was not the original AAC twist as you stated and should not be the universal twist either as it’s focused on heavy subs.
Something I think you left out is the barrel/handguard compatibility. The OG Rattler was proprietary in its operating system and handguard. The Rattler LT is updated to be compatible with all other models of Spear LT.
Great info! Pinned.
And for anyone wanting more info, this means you can't take a Virtus(or Spear LT) handguard and just throw it on an OG Rattler upper. You'd be left with an open gap in your top rail. Trying to add a longer barrel to your OG Rattler will force you to get a Virtus or Spear LT BCG since the operating rods are also different lengths. So, anyone with an OG Rattler has to go through a lot more steps to convert their gun to a longer barrel version. The new LT Rattler is essentially just the Tac Ops version of the Gen2 MCX without the SD handguard, and this change just makes the new Rattler more compatible/modular.
Just waiting on the SD Handguard now.
According to this comment, The Canebrake handguard for OG Rattler is not compatible with the Rattler LT. Does that correct?
@@멍멍이-f8owithout modification, you have to Dremel off a part of the top rail.
old school rat looks better
Two is one, One is none. At least that's the excuse I'm giving myself to purchase the Rattler LT. I also have an original rattler and love just about everything about it. I like the new receiver features on the new MCX/ Spear rifles so I appreciate them being added to the Rattler LT. Also the compatibility with the other LT models is kind of cool in my opinion. I found myself wanting that with the original Rattler because of the pistol brace fiasco.
Am stuck on getting the rattler Lt or spear Lt 9inch
I now own more sig spears than ar15's. The best way to take off the muzzle device is buying a Gieselle reaction rod. Grinding off the 1 and 3 o'clock lugs. This will allow it to fit into the mcx/spear series of rifles just like it was made for it. The rod is still able to be used with AR15's. Yeah, it cost about 100 bucks for the reaction rod but the grinding off of the lugs doesn't make it mcx/spear specific, so I say it's a no brainer for those who own both platforms.
I’ll check that out!
This video will probably be a good example of my capital gains loses for 2024 in 300 BLK.....
😅😂
I like the LT the most. I think it's a redesign and though out much better.
Very well done video, my favorite gun is probably my OG Rattler with the 5 inch barrel, I don’t chase women so I’m good sacrificing the extra inch 😂 #SizeMatters
😂😂 thank you!
5" is plenty dude. All the sensory parts are within first 3 inches anyways 😂.
Soo will they offer an upper Conversion Kit for this one like they did for the original? For those of us who already have an SBR Lower available.
I have the 5.5 version and I like it better because it fits the smaller Virtus BP . The extra inch and suppressor FH wouldn't let it fit. I think the actual weight is about the same for both.
I like both tbh
Does the 5.5 have less recoil? Comparing both with same can?
FYI: I did boil water then took it off the stove and let the muzzle set in the hot water for 1 hour. However, when I got my muzzle device off on the rattler LT I saw no indication of rocksett. I believe the taper is just really solid and they crank it down at the factory. Easiest way is to remove barrel and put in vise against the sides of the gas block. Use a bit of heat/torch evenly and then use a crescent wrench. Went pretty easy if you have a solid vise and some heat. It did take a few heating cycles with me trying to loosen in between heating.
I’ll try that!
Plus 1 for my rattler LT. It didn't have rockset I just used a socket and my impact driver. It came right off
Someone from Sig (I'm in NH not far from their main store) told me they don't use Rocksett. People think Sig does because they are on there so incredibly tight.
I like that you can just get a Spear upper in the same caliber and have more capability. 🐱💙🙏🏻👊🏻🌚
Only thing I care about is how gassy is the new LT? My 5.5 will choke you out indoors
increasing the barrell length on the new rattler is an admission from sig that 5.5 is too short even for the 300blk. disapoointing but lets rather have that +1 inch if needed than not.
It has nothing to do with 300BLK and everything to do with having more dwell time to work with so it’s not as gassy suppressed.
Interesting discussion 🍿
Why didn't they put that rattler tag on the spear, but with spear
LT is a definite upgrade with ambi controls and compatibility with other LT handguards and barrels but light it is not (Yoda?).
It’s lighter than the OG Rattler.
@@echofoxtrotwhiskey1595 True. True. Still there are significantly lighter platforms for this barrel length and caliber. I'm being picky I suppose. I really want to see more mainstream companies using better materials liked forged magnesium receivers, titanium small parts, and carbon fiber furniture though. Sure it's expensive now, but if it begins to be manufactured at scale, it won't be expensive forever. Then the whole industry is propelled forward. This isn't even considering the untapped advancements in cartridge technology that is just waiting to be used by mainstream firearms manufacturers at large. That could REALLY propel firearms tech forward. Smaller, lighter guns with lighter ammo that has the same effect as current full size MSRs.
🇺🇸
Seems like a waste.
I'll stick with my canebrake.
Nice review!!! Just might grab one.
As for me a 6.75 barrel is a downgrade. The old rattler with a folding stock and K can is easier to conceal in a backpack.
What’s confusing is the “overall length” according to SIG is 16.5” for the LT vs. 23.5” for the OG 5.5 inch barrel. This cannot be accurate.
@@chrisket2981 Hmmm I feel like it's 23.5 with a stock.
@@not_your_business666 must be “extended” overall length.
They might have got their specs mixed up on the website.
Oh, and by the way, it really DOES fit inside a backpack perfectly.
We have no restrictions in my state, so when I show up to the range ppl always compliment when it’s unzipped and pulled out nonchalant.
Which brace do you prefer? The sb tactical one or the strike industries one?
The coolest thing is.. everyone now does Garand thumb run and gun intro as a standard..
Holy jeeeeSUS.... and dip my milk in cookies. You got a permit for that fully-auto-finger. ( FAF ) my guy? Lol
Also... i have no idea what the heck i just said 😂🤦🏻♂️
Did I miss it or did you compare the weights and the cost 🤔
The man can shoot!!
Assault on a target dummy 😢
6.75 inch barrel or 6.5 inch barrel?
6.75
Factory sig three prong muzzle device is not difficult to remove on 300 blk rattler. Clamp the barrel assembly in a a vice and It will come right off with a wrench and a bit of leverage. Only on the 5.56 rattler barrel is the muzzle device really stuck on, because it is attached at the factory with Rokset thread glue because it is not supposed to be removed because sig does not recommend people run that short of a 5.56 barrel suppressed.
The muzzle device on the 556 spear lt is literally designed to take a sig silencer 😂
@@TYMGhosT not the sbr rattler with 5.5” barrel. The barrel length is the primary difference
Weight difference?
Without all of the attachments, the rattler lt is 5.1lbs and the older rattler is 5.7lbs.
rattler upper + regulator lower would be cool
What is the foregrip on the original rattler here?
It’s 1.25 inches more bro!
My main interest in comparing the two lies in it's ability to effectively manage gas with suppressed 300 blk and more importantly it's ability to switch between subs and supers on the fly. After shooting subs does the gas need to be togled when loading a magazine of supers or have they found a middle ground in their 2 stage gas setting.
Beyond that, the 300 blk Rattlers true competitor, in my eyes, is the CMMG Dissent and it appears to handle gas, both sub and super, like a pro. However, I have yet to find a true and full comparison of both platforms and more specifically their gas management and how functional it is to toggle them during use or if it's needed.
Thanks for covering the cosmetic fluff though, the Sig website doesn't seem to care enough about it's civilian clients to offer much or any information on the subject.
Dont compare cmmg to sig
Not even in same ballpark
Great review man thank you!
Almost 3 bands ugh
Which one is heavier?
The OG
Vote for Pedro
same trigger as the spear 100%
What red dot is that?
LT price?
Hope you're keeping it
I like the old rattler more, I find it better looking
1st Gen
Slap some brt covert comps in them
He sure showed that cardboard
lol
Does it have a bendy barrel like the spear rifles?
Barrels don't bend, Retorque the barrel bolts to the new spec...5lbs more than the old spec.
Did you purchase you LT with the telescoping brace?
That grip looks horrible.
What sight is on the new rattler?
The Rattler LT has a 6 & 3/4" barrel not a 6.5" like you said.. Just saying
Old or New both overpriced
Don’t do boiling water, just leave the muzzle in a cup of water for 24 hours. Ez pz bb
No I got cmmg dissent instead
I’m get a Rattler LT fasho
What brand of ammo did you run for the rattler mine is having feeding issue
I wondered the same thing but can it really be the ammo?
Running subs without suppressor and on high gas setting the og doesn't push bolt back enough to allow correct feeding.
Subscribed!!
Did I miss you telling me the weight difference?!?
About a pound.
Ones lighter
I think the lt is a major upgrade because if the weight saving, trigger (plus you can use any trigger now), and more mlok points
They should have gone with a 7” barrel, I think that’s the sweet spot for 300 black as a do all cqb system
The new rattler is heavier than the old rattler just an fyi.
You can get it in a 7.5” configuration from the factory.
Bezt intro bro
Video starts at 1:41
No. Video starts at 10:13
When will the 5.56 with 7.75” barrel be released?
Never, it's meant for 300
Why would you want a barrel that short for .556 anyway?
I’d buy the SIG LT and Rattler LT if they offered with a slower twist. I prefer to shoot the zippy supersonic 300’s and the 1:5 twist is way too fast. Great for subs and suppression but not 110-125 gr.
how so? the rotational energy difference in supers is SUBSTANIAL having the faster barrel. The people who developed the round put it in all their weapons as does sig. 1:5 is what all 300blk barrels should be.
@@mattrogers6237 110 gr bullets in a 9” barrel run about 2150 fps. With 1:5 fast twist at that velocity, excessive bullet rpm and bullet jacket separation becomes a problem. Bullet rpm for the aforementioned is in the RED at nearly 310,000 rpm..entering solid bullet territory. David Silver, the R&D Chief at AAC that developed the 300 blackout found the most versatile barrel twist for supers and subs to be 1:7 and 1:8..that was the design goal of 300 BO to be capable of doing both. SIG focused on maximizing subs for suppression in the Spear LT hence the 1:5, but to the detriment of supers. If you review Daniel Defense, LWRC, LMT and most other manufacturer offerings, they use 1:7 NOT 1:5. 1:5 is not what AAC intended as you stated. 1:5 is specialized for subs.
110 gr bullets reach about 2,150 fps out of a 9” barrel. At this velocity and a 1:5 twist, excessive bullet rpm and potential for jacket separation is a possibility. Bullet rpm for the aforementioned is about 310,000 rpm. That’s in the RED, where not all jacketed bullet designs will stay together. David Silver, the AAC R&D Chief that developed the 300 BO, found the most versatile twist for subs and supers is 1:7 and 1:8. The design goal of the cartridge was to be able to shoot both. SIG chose to optimize the Spear LT 300 BO for subs and sound suppression by choosing 1:5, and to the detriment of lightweight supers. If you review manufacturer offerings from LWRC, Daniel Defense, LMT, BCM and others they all use 1:7. 1:5 was not the original AAC twist as you stated and should not be the universal twist either as it’s focused on heavy subs.
@@jimrodriguez8047i agree with this in regards to supers.
@@jimrodriguez8047 1:5 is superior in testing.
Unwatchable
I hate this gun
Enjoy your Kel Tec
@@great_deception armalite
@@jammbbs1688Even better, stuck in the 70s.
@@great_deception armalite makes rifles to this day it's not same management but they make great shit
@@jammbbs1688just say your poor bro it’s cool. You’ll get there one day.
This year hopefully for me