If you would like to support me and my work, please consider donating to my new Patreon: www.patreon.com/mapsinanutshell If you'd like to turn your ideas into future videos and get early access to video teasers, join the Discord server here: discord.gg/4dNDQMsF5f
@@PhreashContent But according to this the first Americans came from South Asia by India or North Asia by Russia. The ones going through Europe have barely found the British Isles yet. It seems the ones out of Africa found Vancouver Island BEFORE finding the British Isles.
It's funny to think how Madagascar is so close to the place where the first humans emerged and was one of the last places discovered by humans, excluding Antarctica and other extreme places
Well, it seem the video is kind of wrong with the dates. Proofs has been founds that show the first homo sapiens in France around at least -42.000, which is nearly 15.000 years before what the video's showing. there are a lot of debates between scientists about the presence of homo sapiens in europe before -40.000, as the oldest tracks cant clearly show if they come from Sapiens, or more primitives humans. Bows has been found in France from -54.000, there is no proofs that homo neandertalis were using bows, in fact today we know that the first used bows were by Sapiens. But as I said, there are a lot of debates. And we dont know everything with certitudes. If this is the case, Homo sapiens has been in "france" around the same time than in "germany" nor western europe.
@@hashira9223 I mean to be fair, the colonies wanted representation while discussing said taxes, not necessarily not having them in the first place. Plus, by percentage basis, there were times where the taxes on goods were on EVERYTHING imported at a much higher percentage during that period until obviously a few protests which reduced them up until only having a few taxes like tea.
am i the only 1 that saw spain get discovered and then undiscovered at the 1 minute mark? Like they were really like "it aint that cool here, lets leave and pretend we never saw it"
It's just crazy to see the population only at 1 Billion after hundreds of thousands of years. But after the 1900s (wars), it just literally took only 100 years more for that 1 billion to become 8 billion. Talk about comfort..
@@lizardi257 But at what cost? we may have material wealth but we lost meaning and our spirits suffer because of that, Both Communism and Capitalism are anti-human ideologies, and they come from the same evil root: Illuminism.
@@Gitsmashercapitalism is a very great system to develop a economy. Look at china. After it become capitalist it's economy exploded. The same people,the same place,the same resources much better results than communism
Nepal's mountains are what surprised me the most. They were discovered pretty late in human history. It shows how difficult it is to even explore them.
Didn’t they find a pile of like, 70 human corpses killed by a hailstorm there? I don’t remember what it was called, but it’s scary stuff. Might’ve been Roopkund Lake?
As I watched this time lapse, it occurred to me that to even *begin* considering just how many cultures coalesced, thrived, declined, then fell or were late absorbed or dispersed by another group throughout Mankind's nearly 300,000-year long history would be an exercise in futility and a path to madness. Imagine: Just think of how many ethnicities, cultures, languages, religions, and so much more have been lost to the course of time, with little evidence of their existence left for future peoples to discover - if any would-be evidence survived in the first place?
I don't think they got lost per se, but transformed, merged, divided, etc. Today's religions and cultures are a testament of that, we are their descent
Minor correction: the Aboriginies have been in Australia a lot longer than shown here, they first reached the continent about 65000 years ago. Other than that, this video is great.
@@giorgioarmani8394 The Aboriginal People of Australia were, in fact, Homo Sapiens. And as mentioned above, have been present on the continent of at least 65000 years.
This is why I always send a single scout on horseback to the opposite end of the map in _Age of Empires._ Better to find out early what you're dealing with and where the opportunities might be.
I'm loving that our ancestors decided that walking/rafting to Australia and North America was a more viable option than moving another 20 feet to go live in France.
France is "hidden" on 2 sides by mountain ranges. Sure yes if you approach it from the north, its way easier, but those pastures where already quite great, living on fertile riverbeds in germany and the netherlands.
@@greentitan0262 France is also on the same continent, and shares coastlines on the North and South that was inhabited by other people. Also walking to Australia and circumnavigating it is no easy feat, let alone crossing ice bridges, going over the Rocky mountains, and going down to Florida. Let's face it, Humanity did a LOT in 40k years, basically anything to avoid Fr*nce, and who can blame them
@@michael9433 im just explaining what could be the most logical reasoning for what we see happening. Just like that the entire coastline of australia was inhabited quite quickly, they didnt go inland for a long time because there was no real reason to. They had great food availabillity, and there where no islands they could see to travel to. This in france happened aswell, just on a much smaller scale.
Imagine being a small tribe of people, and in some areas it could be decades before you met another large group of people. And they likely didn't speak your language or know anything about you either. Fascinating to think about.
Fun fact: it is in discussion if the human expansion to the Americas occured first from Asia to North America (+/- 30k years ago), or from Africa to South America (+/- 50k years ago). Stlements and other discoveries started the debate, and among them is the "Serra da Capivara National Park", a world heritage site declared by UNESCO. Also, the people who expanded to Madagascar first weren't in Africa. They sailed from Indonesia through the favorable currents of the sea, and then some people in Africa went there. That's why the linguistic group of the indigenous people of Madagascar is the same as the ones in Indonesia, and the genetic pool resembles other african groups
@@zetbalta1043 Not only that, "an ancient signal of shared ancestry with the Natives of Australia and Melanesia was detected among the Natives of the Amazon region"
250,000 years ago, one species emerged in the savannahs of Africa. A species that was aware of the world around them, was able to think, talk, and form ideas. Comprehend its own existence. Creating art and culture, and outsmarting any predator through ingenuity. A species that expanded throughout the world, driven by curiosity, and the quest for knowledge. And the universe was never the same. This is the story of Homo Sapiens, and we're living it.
It’s interesting to think that humanity originated around Lake Victoria and followed the Nile’s tributaries to what would become Egypt. This information was then lost, and the lake wouldn’t be rediscovered as the source of the Nile until the 19th century.
I kinda recall there being theories that there was an extinction level event if not multiple before the ice age. Homonids had it rough for a long time until our sapien population grew and spread from subsaharan africa.
@@mattyice2099It wasn’t an extinction-level event since Sapiens are still extant. All other species of humans are extinct, but the find in Morocco was of “us” (Homo sapiens.) Sapiens have not only been around for at least 315,000 years, but were already traversing the Sahara at that time. Pervious theories suggested that Sapiens are of eastern African origin, but that’s now held to be in some doubt. Sapiens are now said to have emerged in sub-Saharan Africa in general, since they were constantly moving across the whole of that part of the continent, making it impossible to pin-down any exact place of origin more specific than that.
It is said that the humans that dared to enter France became some weird subhuman creatures that eat frogs and get obliterated by a country that they themselves made, Germany, land of Hitl-
"discovering" and "inhabiting" are vastly different things, especially when it comes to space. I would love a timelapse of various stars and planets being discovered, starting with most of the night sky being visible immediately of course. It would be quite difficult to make though, so I'm not sure if anyone will any time soon.
@@kraken_dash no it wont lmao compare the technology we had 100 years ago to what we have today, i wouldn't be surprised if we see interplanetary space travel in our lifetimes
Imagine being the guy at 1:09 walking through uncharted territory from northern China to east Russia and meeting another guy in the middle of nowhere and be like "dude WTF"
I believe the reason why there was inhabited for so long was because Mongolia had very very mountinous terrain AND it gets extremely cold with thin air to breathe
Weird to think how Antarctica, an entire continent, was only discovered in 1820 for the first time considering how far humanity had evolved already back then. Although there are also theories that Antarctica was already discovered several centuries earlier by polynesian seafarers.
I feel like there needs to be more contexts for this video with the additional information of major world events such as the ice age and the supervolcano eruption to make it easier for everyone to understand why things happen
Was about to point out that growth wasnt that constant. We all know that, but yeah, demographics are relevant enough and to have in mind. Toba, from what it's thought, got us very close to extinction.
funny was thinking the same. There some definite "pulses" of expansion that if I remember my geography, coincided with certain ice ages when land bridges appeared between continents as sea levels fell.
Also, the first Homo sapien skull ever found (in 2017) is in Morocco in north-west Africa 315 000 y ago (Djebel Irhoud homosapian). You can google it, and it's not 250 000 in East Africa as mentioned on the video. There are a lot of mistakes in the video, unfortunately.
I'm loving the suggestion that humanity went all the way through Siberia into North America before ever setting France. I knew France was memetically unpopular, but that just takes the cake.
@@Woap_64 Everyone says it's France, but look at what appears right before that part does. What appears directly before that does is France. It even says France on the map as it does. The part that remains black must then be the Italian Peninsula.
This sort of video gains a lot from on-screen notes of significant events and periods such as ice ages, sea level changes, great migrations, die-offs, and such. It also helps to have things like the population counter not be on top of relevant parts of the map when there are vast swaths of empty ocean for such things.
the only thing is that it is full of errors. In some parts instead of facts it includes assumptions(showing much earlier dates - Estonia, Fenno-Scandia), while in others parts (Australia), it doesn't include facts and shows dates much later. at least these are errors what I saw the first time I saw the video. Somehow I think that the more I dive in, the more errors can be found.
The Toba volcano eruption 74,000 years ago dropped human population to a few thousand. The timeline here shows a linear increase with no account for that catastrophe.
The map is wrong here. Madagascar was only settled around 500 AD, not 4000BC. Most of the islands in the Atlantic were only settled in the 15th century.
hunter gatherers didn't have boat to travel they were walking to mid east so it kinda make sense they discovered it late, the hunter gatherer evolved first because they thrive harder while the one that stays in zone 1 still eenacting traditional practices to live, that's why staying in traditional value without seeing other cultural perspectives is a circling dead end of society.
An important thing to note is that this is a modern map. At the time, there would have been land bridges, the ice age, huge river basins in Africa, and more that occurred over such a timespan.
yea like scandinavia mostly was underwater and under thick ice with temp around -40C, there is no way humans explore this region 30k age ago, finland started forming around 10k age ago
If you want to learn more about our ancestors who lived 10,000 years ago and earlier, I recommend an excellent anthropologist named Stanislav Drobyshevsky. Unfortunately, he conducts lectures and records popular science videos only in Russian, and I do not know if this material has been translated into English. However, there is always a "subtitles" button, the main thing is to find a video where the sound quality is good. In addition to an interesting and understandable presentation, he also dilutes the lectures with jokes. I'll give you a couple of them: - "More often a bear examines a person's coccyx than the other way around." - "Turning legs into flippers and bodies into a fat skin does not contribute to the development of intelligence." - "The Mesozoic was generally marked by some kind of rabies of devouring. It is clear that living creatures have been eating each other since the Precambrian, but in the Mesozoic everything went completely off the rails."
This transition does not reflect the Toba Catastrophe Theory: 70,000 years ago, the Toba eruption killed off all but 5,000 of the human population that lived in and around South Africa.
Its just a *_Theory_* since it still does not have any conclusive proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Interesting theory. Very very likely to be possible. But it is still just a theory, and not a fact, yet, until we find evidence that supports the theory beyond a reasonable doubt.
@@nicklibby3784 Everything in this video up to the past couple hundred years is conjecture based on theories and limited information. The evidence for the Toba Catastrophe is stronger than the rest of the first 2/3 of this video.
Fun fact: what looks like 2 seconds after discovering australia, we extinct 23 out of 24 animals that are above the weight of 100 pounds. Including a 3 ton (the weight of 10 bears), 6 foot tall diprotodon. Only one to survive was kangaroos.
Yeah I keep hearing that Aboriginals were in "perfect balance" with nature. Guess megafauna isn't part of that balance. Wherever humans go other species always decline. Biodiversity in Chernobyl is increasing because of a lack of human presence. Sad that we cause more damage to an environment than a nuclear disaster.
I like to imagine we were created to be game for the tigers to hunt and to help with fruit propagation, but then we went and broke the game so hard it caused even the weather to lag
@@samwallaceart288 i think there was a KAREN on a space ship and aliens just dropped us on this planet. And they dropped karen on the moon. used to be life there, but everything died because of karen ..uhmm?
Yup, thats one thing they don't seem to tesch well in schools. Just a simple population graph would blow our minds at how all throughout human history the population was relatively stable and climbed very very slowly and mostly remaining the same. Then, it wasn't until the 1,500s we saw some decent population growth - but it took 100 to 200 years for it to actually grow a bit, then between 1750 - 1900 the world finally saw some good growth from just under 1 billion people in the world to around 1.5 billion people in the world! So .5 times more people or a growth of 50% in 200 years - a new record! Then starting in the year 1900 to 2023, the world saw the largest population incease AND fastest rate of increase in the entire worlds history. We went from around 1.5 billion people to 8 billion people in a matter of about 100 years. Whoch os like an increase of almost 800% in ONLY 100 years !!!! Which is a staggering increase compared to the previous record of 50% increase between 1750 & 1900. I don't think people realize just how insane that population increase is - and they especially dont comprehend the rate of increase in population and just how fast and recent it was. This is why its so difficult to compare modern behaviors and social norms to the historical norms. The world and society is just fundamentally different based off the population size and rate of increase inherently. Humans throughout history have never had soany choices for mates, or opportunities for jobs or such big & close social connections that cities offer. Sure there was big cities like london back in the day, but it was nothing like how it is now. This is why modern societies have soooo many problems that just simply did not exist in the past - because there just wasn't as many people back then, so societies & economies worked completely differently.
Crazy to think that the population boom at the end just meant more people made it to old age, hard to imagine the shear number of people who had absolutely brutal horrible deaths caused by the natural world.
This isn't how it happened. The have found a humanoid fossil in Bulgaria over 7.2M years older. Much older than the oldest found in Ethiopia which was 5M from what I remember
0:36 starting right here is one of the greatest mysteries in human prehistory. It is called by some “the cognitive leap”. Anatomically modern humans emerged around 220,000 years ago and spread across Africa. There are no visible physical differences between these humans and humans today but they were different in behavior. They had much less developed material cultures, less complex social structures, and never left Africa. 50-70 thousand years ago something happened, we are not sure what and things changed rapidly. Many humans left Africa and spread out rapidly across Eurasia all the way to Australia within just a few thousand years. Where humanity barely changes in 150,000 years technological and social changes started to happen. Larger communities formed, tools improved, and simple domestication of plants and animals started getting underway. By 12,000 BC farming communities were being established and in the next few thousand years cities and civilizations started forming and human progress has grown exponentially since then.
I think that figuring out the basics of life was alot harder then building on them. The key things humans had to find out was making and maintaining fire. A leading theory is that consuming cooked meat and vegtables gave us enough nutriens to maintain a bigger brain wich was useful in finding better ways in getting those nutriens. Human culture is just a byproduct.
@ it’s very possible. That was an extremely challenging bottleneck for humanity. It could have acted as a strong pressure for humans to become more intelligent in a short span of time.
Much of this is debatable or outright incorrect. Madagascar is outright incorrect. The *earliest* estimated dates of settlement range from -350 to 550. Furthermore, they were discovered from the East, by peoples from Indonesia that crossed the Indian Ocean. Yep. It was discovered by Polynesians from thousands of miles away, not peoples from Africa. And certainly not in the year -6000 or so. There is evidence that people may have found it earlier, but it is tentative at best with no signs of lasting human presence. Furthermore, the timeline for the discovery of Iceland, the Azores, and New Zealand is highly debatable - there is strong evidence that Iceland was found in the 700s (carbon dating shows that the settlements/carvings/cabins, believed to be by Irish monks known as the Papar, were abandoned around the year 800). Also the Azores has evidence for settlement before the year 1000 by the Norse, likely blown off course. New Zealand is also debatable as it was discovered first from the northeast, not from Australia, and it was discovered 500+ years after Iceland not at the same time. There are likely other errors I'm too lazy to look into, but these are the major ones that come to mind.
Wish they could see this right now, this data is actually correct and confirmed. I checked some history sites in case this was rubbish (it wasn’t lol).
there are traces of homo-sapiens in Brittany and Aquitania that date back from 70 000 BCE.. In South Wales and Cornwall in 40 000 BCE (although no presence found between 34 000 BCE and 11 000 BCE)
Fun fact 100 million people have been born sense this video came out I base this off of the population number at the end and the current population counter
@@jaredjosephsongheng372 yupz the video wasn't accurate, 75k years ago toba volcano got eruption in Indonesia and almost killed all human population. Only 10k peoples has survived
Ah yes, France and Spain territories were full of dragons and giants, that's why humanity in Swizerland territory took 40,000 years to go there while the other part of humanity went to Australia and America first by walking
I see this video's been out for 10 months, but I'm still gonna comment. There is no speculation or anything, it's been discovered recently, but the Amazon was already inhabited by hundrets of thousands of people 20.000 BC or even earlier than that. They found giant like geoglyphs and roads in the west side of brazil, where they've been cutting down forests, and the carbon date of certain things there dates back very far. And there's still so much to be uncovered. The history keeps changing.
@@squidtard9629 later on the neanderthal were massacred by the homo sapiens but for the denisovans scientists and historians doesn't know what happened to them
Они также могут измерять уровни CO2, атмосферные изменения (в результате выращивания людьми продуктов питания), изменения ландшафта, костей и т. д. + Написания. Они также могут оценить численность населения на основе того, на что, как они знали, способно общество, исходя из количества зданий, которые у них были, и вещей, которые они построили - для достижения этого должна быть минимальная численность населения что.
Back then, humans discovered entire continents and didn't know or care, today, if someone discovered a tiny sand atoll with absolutely nothing on it, the whole world would freak out
In other words, putting Africa on the far left and America on the far right means we can our spread from left to right in one shot without needing to wrap around the edge. Until _very_ recently the Atlantic was a major barrier while the land-bridge across Alaska meant a pacific route was there early on. This view is the classic view for European maps, which were drawn when Transatlantic expansion was the new big thing; but in terms of human expansion across all history, putting the Alaska bridge middle-right makes more sense since Transatlantic crossing is an ocean-jump anyways
i dont think this theory is as accurate as we think. because i dont think hordes of humans who migrated into new lands didnt get around to know where they begun previously (or) didnt held any kind of communication with the lands which they inhabited previously. only way is there are multiple places where humans originated though it doesnt support scientifically.
Are you trying to say humans (homo-sapiens) evolved in multiple places in different times and just so happen in all cases to have similar enough DNA to reproduce with each other?
There can't be multiple points of origin for a species. That would require that multiple close human ancestors spread around the world and then all these separate groups speciated in the exact same way completely independent of one another so that they coincidentally became more similar to each other than where they started despite having different environmental pressures.
![[4k]Sea Level Rise and Fall Simulation - World](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/q87mUl13s-s/mqdefault.jpg)
If you would like to support me and my work, please consider donating to my new Patreon: www.patreon.com/mapsinanutshell
If you'd like to turn your ideas into future videos and get early access to video teasers, join the Discord server here: discord.gg/4dNDQMsF5f
Our story as sapiens began much before -250 000 and were many more than 10k
L athiest@@ommsterlitz1805
DO YOU KNOW MUSTAFA IM HIS LIL BRO
Thank you for making so when *America* “God bless it” entered, the music climaxed
@@PhreashContent But according to this the first Americans came from South Asia by India or North Asia by Russia. The ones going through Europe have barely found the British Isles yet. It seems the ones out of Africa found Vancouver Island BEFORE finding the British Isles.
It's funny to think how Madagascar is so close to the place where the first humans emerged and was one of the last places discovered by humans, excluding Antarctica and other extreme places
@@leaderofmine6293 you're didn't read the book of the English school in, Huh?
@@leaderofmine6293Nigga I just had a stroke trying to read what you just said
That's because humans didn't start in Africa.
@@a330flyguy2…
@@a330flyguy2 where then?
"what's that shadowy place?"
"That is France, Simba. You must never ever go there"
In 2024, really?
Based
Well, it seem the video is kind of wrong with the dates.
Proofs has been founds that show the first homo sapiens in France around at least -42.000, which is nearly 15.000 years before what the video's showing.
there are a lot of debates between scientists about the presence of homo sapiens in europe before -40.000, as the oldest tracks cant clearly show if they come from Sapiens, or more primitives humans.
Bows has been found in France from -54.000, there is no proofs that homo neandertalis were using bows, in fact today we know that the first used bows were by Sapiens. But as I said, there are a lot of debates. And we dont know everything with certitudes.
If this is the case, Homo sapiens has been in "france" around the same time than in "germany" nor western europe.
"what are those shadowy places?" That is Philippines and France. Simba, You must never go to those 2 places.
“What are those shadowy places?” “Those are France, The Philippines and Tibet.” “Never go to those 3 places”
Humanity gameplay: paying taxes
Humanity lore:
Dominate all continents for more taxes lol.
American lore: rebel and create a country because of British taxes only to have heavier taxes by the government later
@@hashira9223Also fight over black people
@@hashira9223 I mean to be fair, the colonies wanted representation while discussing said taxes, not necessarily not having them in the first place. Plus, by percentage basis, there were times where the taxes on goods were on EVERYTHING imported at a much higher percentage during that period until obviously a few protests which reduced them up until only having a few taxes like tea.
@@hashira9223Time for another rebellion
am i the only 1 that saw spain get discovered and then undiscovered at the 1 minute mark?
Like they were really like "it aint that cool here, lets leave and pretend we never saw it"
They were getting a bit too close to France 😂
Oh yeah, wtf
i love how they got into europe but refused to enter france for thousands of years
Unga bunga = Ew… it’s France
Btw this false, they are arrived around like - 60 000 if my memory is good
Because of Asterix
Our ancestors had bad feeling about that place
Also spain
From 2 billion people, it only took 0.1 seconds to reach 8 billion. That's insane
More people produce more people
Simple, but fact
It’s because of medicine and new better farming methods
thanks capitalism
People need to develop
exponential growth in action, baby!
it's amazing how fast the last 2000 years was
I dont know, took about 2000 years
i think the population spiking was the most fascinating part for me
Yeah it's been like 2000 years
It’s called exponential growth
1 Big argument for me that civilization is Not older then 8000 years
It's just crazy to see the population only at 1 Billion after hundreds of thousands of years. But after the 1900s (wars), it just literally took only 100 years more for that 1 billion to become 8 billion. Talk about comfort..
Fr lmao
Exponential growth
Because of damn healthcare, genetic failures keep staying alive and make earth more densely populated
69 likes is crazy
damn this really puts population growth into perspective... only the last second we have over a billion
With the industrial revolution and the invention of capitalism, humanity grew exponentially and poverty was drastically reduced.
@@lizardi257 capitalism ?.....pls enlighten
@@Gitsmasher easy to access markets and the dissolution of feudalism.
@@lizardi257 But at what cost? we may have material wealth but we lost meaning and our spirits suffer because of that, Both Communism and Capitalism are anti-human ideologies, and they come from the same evil root: Illuminism.
@@Gitsmashercapitalism is a very great system to develop a economy. Look at china. After it become capitalist it's economy exploded. The same people,the same place,the same resources much better results than communism
The Sahara wasn't always desert, it was a green savannah with lakes 11,000 - 5,000 years ago.
and it is said the sahara will be no more a barren desert but a lush growing jungle in the future.
@@PrinceLuciusSiegfriedAmazon becomes desert
@@pragyasilborgohain240 yeah, the amazon also losing it's green paradise in the future.
it's sad that we wouldn't be able to witness the change.
Wherever Islam thrives there shall be no grass that grows there!!
@@scazab6408 are you the only one who devolving here?
Nepal's mountains are what surprised me the most. They were discovered pretty late in human history. It shows how difficult it is to even explore them.
even today, borders arent really enforced there
"This rocky areas suck it freeze my ass off!"
Makes sense, they only discovered it after the last ice age, I imagine the massive ice sheet there was a huge discouragement from any human migrations
I think it's even colder than Russia because unlike in Russia there is a lack of oxygen which causes difficulty in maintaining body temperature.
Didn’t they find a pile of like, 70 human corpses killed by a hailstorm there? I don’t remember what it was called, but it’s scary stuff. Might’ve been Roopkund Lake?
As I watched this time lapse, it occurred to me that to even *begin* considering just how many cultures coalesced, thrived, declined, then fell or were late absorbed or dispersed by another group throughout Mankind's nearly 300,000-year long history would be an exercise in futility and a path to madness.
Imagine: Just think of how many ethnicities, cultures, languages, religions, and so much more have been lost to the course of time, with little evidence of their existence left for future peoples to discover - if any would-be evidence survived in the first place?
I think about this *all the time*. It's crazy to contemplate.
Really speaks to the impermanence of all things. Growth and decay, and then growth again.
I don't think they got lost per se, but transformed, merged, divided, etc. Today's religions and cultures are a testament of that, we are their descent
Minor correction: the Aboriginies have been in Australia a lot longer than shown here, they first reached the continent about 65000 years ago. Other than that, this video is great.
Maybe this map represents only distribution of Homo Sapiens
@@giorgioarmani8394 The Aboriginal People of Australia were, in fact, Homo Sapiens. And as mentioned above, have been present on the continent of at least 65000 years.
@@giorgioarmani8394...they are homo sapiens
@@giorgioarmani8394... You do know what the person is talking about when they say Aboriginal right
@@theirishviking9278
Sure he does. He's being racist and dehumanising the indigenous people of Australia.
That last 10 second were remarkable and amazing! Well done!
From the year 1400 to 1700, almost everything unknown disappeared by Portuguese and Spanish explorers.🇵🇹🇪🇦
Imagine being one of the first people to cross Egypt and seeing the Mediterranean
That’s what I was thinking or the first to enter Asia through the Sinai
definitely thought that shit was a giant mirage lol
*@Connor-Colyer* This never happened. Τhe opposite happened. The people from the north crossed Africa to the south.
@@PlanetIscandar womp womp
@@PlanetIscandargo cry about it
I finally found one of these under 40 minutes that actually shows progress and not just the same map for 10 minutes straight
This is why I always send a single scout on horseback to the opposite end of the map in _Age of Empires._ Better to find out early what you're dealing with and where the opportunities might be.
Lmao this is literally how civilizan and age of empires/StarCraft works
Bro I do that as well
Gotta keep that scout scouting 😂
Some of my favorite games ever
😂 a must strategy! Also finds all the AI players before they build up
I'm loving that our ancestors decided that walking/rafting to Australia and North America was a more viable option than moving another 20 feet to go live in France.
France is "hidden" on 2 sides by mountain ranges.
Sure yes if you approach it from the north, its way easier, but those pastures where already quite great, living on fertile riverbeds in germany and the netherlands.
@@greentitan0262 France is also on the same continent, and shares coastlines on the North and South that was inhabited by other people. Also walking to Australia and circumnavigating it is no easy feat, let alone crossing ice bridges, going over the Rocky mountains, and going down to Florida. Let's face it, Humanity did a LOT in 40k years, basically anything to avoid Fr*nce, and who can blame them
They arrived in north america on land through russia.
@@michael9433 im just explaining what could be the most logical reasoning for what we see happening.
Just like that the entire coastline of australia was inhabited quite quickly, they didnt go inland for a long time because there was no real reason to. They had great food availabillity, and there where no islands they could see to travel to.
This in france happened aswell, just on a much smaller scale.
Ice ages as well
Imagine being a small tribe of people, and in some areas it could be decades before you met another large group of people. And they likely didn't speak your language or know anything about you either. Fascinating to think about.
Based on genetic evidence, we can infer that a lot of those rare encounters resulted in hot passionate sex.
@@own4801and by hot passionate sex we mean one tribe exterminates the other's males and has their way with the women
@@own4801based ancestors
@@heroninja1125if only we were still like that 😔
@SwagSwagSenate
Said passionate sex was also likely forced. So. Still messed up either way.
I remember seeing a paper that confirmed Madagascar was settled 11,000 years ago instead of the previously believed 1500-2000 years ago
Blue Jay?
Didn't expect Mordecai's psycho brother here
Fun fact: it is in discussion if the human expansion to the Americas occured first from Asia to North America (+/- 30k years ago), or from Africa to South America (+/- 50k years ago). Stlements and other discoveries started the debate, and among them is the "Serra da Capivara National Park", a world heritage site declared by UNESCO.
Also, the people who expanded to Madagascar first weren't in Africa. They sailed from Indonesia through the favorable currents of the sea, and then some people in Africa went there. That's why the linguistic group of the indigenous people of Madagascar is the same as the ones in Indonesia, and the genetic pool resembles other african groups
the bering stretch
@@zetbalta1043 Not only that, "an ancient signal of shared ancestry with the Natives of Australia and Melanesia was detected among the Natives of the Amazon region"
🤓☝🏼
@@sonicwaveinfinitymiddwelle8555Braindead comment
i might be dumb but how would they go straight from africa to south america with their primitive technology
250,000 years ago, one species emerged in the savannahs of Africa. A species that was aware of the world around them, was able to think, talk, and form ideas. Comprehend its own existence. Creating art and culture, and outsmarting any predator through ingenuity. A species that expanded throughout the world, driven by curiosity, and the quest for knowledge.
And the universe was never the same. This is the story of Homo Sapiens, and we're living it.
all those years leading up to skibidi toilet
@@looperinga wise words
False. We originated in the Middle East
@@Caudillo2008goofy ahh
@@Caudillo2008in the middle of Africa? sounds right
Thanks to the author of the channel for being able to be born in -250,000 and live until 2024 and retell to us the entire history of mankind. Respect
There is a study called "history"
@@hiyahiyakotet8927 history is a study of human society it doesn't account for prehistory (well hence the name)
@@youtubeadministration8037 there is history in prehistory
respect.
@@hiyahiyakotet8927there is something called a joke
It’s interesting to think that humanity originated around Lake Victoria and followed the Nile’s tributaries to what would become Egypt. This information was then lost, and the lake wouldn’t be rediscovered as the source of the Nile until the 19th century.
It makes sense, we still don't know a lot about very old Egypt
The oldest homo sapien skull was discovered in Morocco in northwest Africa from around 315,000 years ago.
Was looking for this
I kinda recall there being theories that there was an extinction level event if not multiple before the ice age. Homonids had it rough for a long time until our sapien population grew and spread from subsaharan africa.
@@laniakealocal1934 You should be more responsible! >:(
@@mattyice2099It wasn’t an extinction-level event since Sapiens are still extant. All other species of humans are extinct, but the find in Morocco was of “us” (Homo sapiens.)
Sapiens have not only been around for at least 315,000 years, but were already traversing the Sahara at that time. Pervious theories suggested that Sapiens are of eastern African origin, but that’s now held to be in some doubt. Sapiens are now said to have emerged in sub-Saharan Africa in general, since they were constantly moving across the whole of that part of the continent, making it impossible to pin-down any exact place of origin more specific than that.
@@EggsBenAddictStupid joke I love it
I love how humans colectivelly decided that's definitely better to settle in Siberia than Fr*nce
This is when humanity dared to have the balls to enter France 1:18
I think it's because Neanderthals were in France and we had to kick their asses first.
Well, humans were already nesr siberia first, and they traveled through Siberia to get to north America. Vis the Russia -Alaska land bridge.
It is said that the humans that dared to enter France became some weird subhuman creatures that eat frogs and get obliterated by a country that they themselves made, Germany, land of Hitl-
funny racism
Can't wait until part 2 comes out with discovering space!!!!
yeah that would happen in 4024
It would probably just be mostly nothing then everything but it would get less and less blurry.
That gonna take thousands or even millions of years 💀
"discovering" and "inhabiting" are vastly different things, especially when it comes to space. I would love a timelapse of various stars and planets being discovered, starting with most of the night sky being visible immediately of course. It would be quite difficult to make though, so I'm not sure if anyone will any time soon.
@@kraken_dash no it wont lmao compare the technology we had 100 years ago to what we have today, i wouldn't be surprised if we see interplanetary space travel in our lifetimes
Imagine being the guy at 1:09 walking through uncharted territory from northern China to east Russia and meeting another guy in the middle of nowhere and be like "dude WTF"
And probably using those exact words.
I believe the reason why there was inhabited for so long was because Mongolia had very very mountinous terrain AND it gets extremely cold with thin air to breathe
0:57 : Let's visit Spain !
1:06 : Nvm, it's shitty here.
>going to Spain
>find no Barsa-Real match here
>"too early!"
>go back to Morocco
Lmao
Don't use that words
@@theoryianabsolute8777🥺
@@theoryianabsolute8777 🥺
It's like exploring the area to clear the Fog of War
Yep
Rise and fall?
Were still playing fog of war though, the Universe is so big we only reach solar system yet
@@Kok1ok2 true
Found a fellow RtS player lol
Weird to think how Antarctica, an entire continent, was only discovered in 1820 for the first time considering how far humanity had evolved already back then. Although there are also theories that Antarctica was already discovered several centuries earlier by polynesian seafarers.
Yeah probably. They didnt record the discovery and that led to ppl not realising anatarctica existed
Ur anus was discovered before Antarctica
I'm sure several places, technologies, ideas were discovered/ developed several times. Like the Americas, for example.
Maybe much earlier, but it is a very difficult place to survive without heavy equipment.
Any early civilization would likely die before they reach mainland Antarctica
I can’t wait for human expansion galaxy version
In year 5000 that will be made.
Man shoutout to the 10k people which spawned in 🙏😮💨
I feel like there needs to be more contexts for this video with the additional information of major world events such as the ice age and the supervolcano eruption to make it easier for everyone to understand why things happen
Was about to point out that growth wasnt that constant. We all know that, but yeah, demographics are relevant enough and to have in mind. Toba, from what it's thought, got us very close to extinction.
funny was thinking the same. There some definite "pulses" of expansion that if I remember my geography, coincided with certain ice ages when land bridges appeared between continents as sea levels fell.
it's "mapsinanutshell". The short condensed format is the point
1:07 the oldest intelligent human settlement ever discovered in Europe was in grotte Chauvet in France 35 000 years ago yet it's still in the dark
It sucks,fake video
Also, the first evidence of humans in Australia dates to 50,000 to 65,000 years ago yet the map doesn't show it until around that same time stamp
Also, the first Homo sapien skull ever found (in 2017) is in Morocco in north-west Africa 315 000 y ago (Djebel Irhoud homosapian). You can google it, and it's not 250 000 in East Africa as mentioned on the video. There are a lot of mistakes in the video, unfortunately.
I'm loving the suggestion that humanity went all the way through Siberia into North America before ever setting France. I knew France was memetically unpopular, but that just takes the cake.
If you're referring to that dark blotch, that's the Italian Peninsula, not France.
@@bentonrp No it's not
@@Woap_64 Everyone says it's France, but look at what appears right before that part does. What appears directly before that does is France. It even says France on the map as it does. The part that remains black must then be the Italian Peninsula.
This sort of video gains a lot from on-screen notes of significant events and periods such as ice ages, sea level changes, great migrations, die-offs, and such.
It also helps to have things like the population counter not be on top of relevant parts of the map when there are vast swaths of empty ocean for such things.
The population counter is see through also this video is about the discovery of the world not sea levels and ice ages
the only thing is that it is full of errors. In some parts instead of facts it includes assumptions(showing much earlier dates - Estonia, Fenno-Scandia), while in others parts (Australia), it doesn't include facts and shows dates much later. at least these are errors what I saw the first time I saw the video. Somehow I think that the more I dive in, the more errors can be found.
The Toba volcano eruption 74,000 years ago dropped human population to a few thousand. The timeline here shows a linear increase with no account for that catastrophe.
Also severals asteroids impacted the Americas in the 50,000-25,000 BC further reducing the population
That has only ever been a hypothesis, and there has been quite a bit of research since that has cast doubt on it.
@@michaelweston409 those reductions do show up in the population counter
This is a vague representation, not a point for point recap of the worlds population history bud.
there was an ice age 20k years ago, too. population should have fallen significantly during that period.
It took those slackers a surprisingly long time to find Madagascar.
The map is wrong here. Madagascar was only settled around 500 AD, not 4000BC. Most of the islands in the Atlantic were only settled in the 15th century.
hunter gatherers didn't have boat to travel they were walking to mid east so it kinda make sense they discovered it late, the hunter gatherer evolved first because they thrive harder while the one that stays in zone 1 still eenacting traditional practices to live, that's why staying in traditional value without seeing other cultural perspectives is a circling dead end of society.
Madagascar wasn’t discovered by Africans. It was actually discovered by Polynesians from Indonesia who sailed west over the Indian Ocean
@@michaelweston409 im from indonesia and i know polynesians have similar language with indonesian
Wow, cool it with the racisim buddy, i mean they never invented the wheel on their own, you expect them to find Madagascar?
An important thing to note is that this is a modern map. At the time, there would have been land bridges, the ice age, huge river basins in Africa, and more that occurred over such a timespan.
Would be more interesting if the revealed map showed the changing sea levels and exposed terrain.
ice needs to be shown as well. GB + Ireland wasn't permanently populated until relatively recently because of Ice ages.
And deserts and forests and rivers have changed a lot too
Oh yeah absolutely, the earth changed so much. The modern map is completely different to how it was walked hundreds of thousands of years ago.
yea like scandinavia mostly was underwater and under thick ice with temp around -40C, there is no way humans explore this region 30k age ago, finland started forming around 10k age ago
You are so underratted, you need more subs. Love the videos!
If you want to learn more about our ancestors who lived 10,000 years ago and earlier, I recommend an excellent anthropologist named Stanislav Drobyshevsky. Unfortunately, he conducts lectures and records popular science videos only in Russian, and I do not know if this material has been translated into English. However, there is always a "subtitles" button, the main thing is to find a video where the sound quality is good. In addition to an interesting and understandable presentation, he also dilutes the lectures with jokes. I'll give you a couple of them:
- "More often a bear examines a person's coccyx than the other way around."
- "Turning legs into flippers and bodies into a fat skin does not contribute to the development of intelligence."
- "The Mesozoic was generally marked by some kind of rabies of devouring. It is clear that living creatures have been eating each other since the Precambrian, but in the Mesozoic everything went completely off the rails."
A very well done video! ❤
This makes me realise the madness of how short these past 3000 years of conflict and border changes are
This transition does not reflect the Toba Catastrophe Theory: 70,000 years ago, the Toba eruption killed off all but 5,000 of the human population that lived in and around South Africa.
well it is a theory
Its just a *_Theory_* since it still does not have any conclusive proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Interesting theory. Very very likely to be possible. But it is still just a theory, and not a fact, yet, until we find evidence that supports the theory beyond a reasonable doubt.
I checked and the number drops from the mongol invasions and the native American genocide for just a bit
@@nicklibby3784 Everything in this video up to the past couple hundred years is conjecture based on theories and limited information. The evidence for the Toba Catastrophe is stronger than the rest of the first 2/3 of this video.
@@hybbfr727 a human theory
ants in my house be like:
😂
damn 8 billion ants in your house? you got a problem brother
Fun fact: what looks like 2 seconds after discovering australia, we extinct 23 out of 24 animals that are above the weight of 100 pounds. Including a 3 ton (the weight of 10 bears), 6 foot tall diprotodon. Only one to survive was kangaroos.
Yeah I keep hearing that Aboriginals were in "perfect balance" with nature. Guess megafauna isn't part of that balance. Wherever humans go other species always decline. Biodiversity in Chernobyl is increasing because of a lack of human presence. Sad that we cause more damage to an environment than a nuclear disaster.
It’s crazy how when agriculture was invented, the population just went off
I'm not sure but at the beginning of the Bronze Age there were wars that ended some empires.
I like to imagine we were created to be game for the tigers to hunt and to help with fruit propagation, but then we went and broke the game so hard it caused even the weather to lag
@@samwallaceart288 The human is so OP that they found a bug in the weather.
@@samwallaceart288 i think there was a KAREN on a space ship and aliens just dropped us on this planet. And they dropped karen on the moon. used to be life there, but everything died because of karen ..uhmm?
When you play Plague Inc in reverse.
Inaccurate, Plague Inc in reverse would have started in somewhere like Iceland or Madagascar.
@@gengarzilla1685 bro that one killed me😂
Or humans are the pathogen, which slowly spread themselves, then get upgrades to spread like crazy and kill their host.
It’s crazy how for 3/4 of our existence, we’ve been chilling in Africa
Now 1/4 cause europe lol
I think people forget how truly vast and diverse the continent of Africa is
@@Mannels14 not really, it's just that Africa is always portrayed as poor, starving people who are uneducated and uncivilized
That's really awesome, dude! 👏👏👏
Great work as always! Well done @mapsinanutshell
I like how they conquered the Sahara Desert, Australia and Tibet but they refuse to go to France and the UK
Amazing how much the deserts and mountain areas slowed exploration down. You can see how mankind went up the Nile to find the mediterranean.
Yeah, the Himalayas remained as this patch of black for some time. It still hasn't even been a century since somebody reached Everest's peak.
Shout out to the ancestors who unlocked the whole map so we could fast travel
we went from one billion to 8 billion in less then a second, considering this vid is 2 mins long that is FAST
It's overpopulation
In the span of the entire history of our planet, existence of Homo Sapiens happened in just blink of an eye
@@steve81937is not overpopulation the earth can sustain 3 trillion humans is simply that we are really not that effective at making the planet clean
Yeah, think about time before we spawned, and it's even crazier
@@steve81937whats considered overpopulation?
We've come a long way, Baby.
crazy how much the population went up at the end. Also the vikings discovered iceland and greenland very long ago
Not that long ago. Iceland wasn't settled until the 800s.
@@taoliu3949
That's 1200 years
Which isnt long when we are are talking about a context of hundreds of thousands of years@@BigBrotherTheWatcher1984
@@BigBrotherTheWatcher1984 which is not that long ago when compared to other land masses
Yup, thats one thing they don't seem to tesch well in schools. Just a simple population graph would blow our minds at how all throughout human history the population was relatively stable and climbed very very slowly and mostly remaining the same. Then, it wasn't until the 1,500s we saw some decent population growth - but it took 100 to 200 years for it to actually grow a bit, then between 1750 - 1900 the world finally saw some good growth from just under 1 billion people in the world to around 1.5 billion people in the world! So .5 times more people or a growth of 50% in 200 years - a new record!
Then starting in the year 1900 to 2023, the world saw the largest population incease AND fastest rate of increase in the entire worlds history.
We went from around 1.5 billion people to 8 billion people in a matter of about 100 years. Whoch os like an increase of almost 800% in ONLY 100 years !!!! Which is a staggering increase compared to the previous record of 50% increase between 1750 & 1900.
I don't think people realize just how insane that population increase is - and they especially dont comprehend the rate of increase in population and just how fast and recent it was.
This is why its so difficult to compare modern behaviors and social norms to the historical norms. The world and society is just fundamentally different based off the population size and rate of increase inherently. Humans throughout history have never had soany choices for mates, or opportunities for jobs or such big & close social connections that cities offer. Sure there was big cities like london back in the day, but it was nothing like how it is now.
This is why modern societies have soooo many problems that just simply did not exist in the past - because there just wasn't as many people back then, so societies & economies worked completely differently.
Crazy to think that the population boom at the end just meant more people made it to old age, hard to imagine the shear number of people who had absolutely brutal horrible deaths caused by the natural world.
it means more that less kids died and more people could afford to have all the kids they want
It's amazing to me that in this day and age we still have people who deny that this is how it happened.
Put two humans in one room and you will get at least three opinions
Yeah makes no sense for 2 people to have made all of humanity. We would he inbred as fuck
@@SwagSwagSenate Please be my teacher
@@GandrewAarfield Yes I also want Swag Swag Senate as my teacher
This isn't how it happened. The have found a humanoid fossil in Bulgaria over 7.2M years older. Much older than the oldest found in Ethiopia which was 5M from what I remember
"How about we explore the area ahead of us later"
-Paimon to traveller
woah. somehow i thought this video was made and uploaded in 2020, but this is actually very cool! good job!
0:36 starting right here is one of the greatest mysteries in human prehistory. It is called by some “the cognitive leap”.
Anatomically modern humans emerged around 220,000 years ago and spread across Africa. There are no visible physical differences between these humans and humans today but they were different in behavior. They had much less developed material cultures, less complex social structures, and never left Africa.
50-70 thousand years ago something happened, we are not sure what and things changed rapidly. Many humans left Africa and spread out rapidly across Eurasia all the way to Australia within just a few thousand years. Where humanity barely changes in 150,000 years technological and social changes started to happen. Larger communities formed, tools improved, and simple domestication of plants and animals started getting underway. By 12,000 BC farming communities were being established and in the next few thousand years cities and civilizations started forming and human progress has grown exponentially since then.
It's incredible to see how they created and believed in so many things so quickly despite having scarce resources.
I think that figuring out the basics of life was alot harder then building on them. The key things humans had to find out was making and maintaining fire. A leading theory is that consuming cooked meat and vegtables gave us enough nutriens to maintain a bigger brain wich was useful in finding better ways in getting those nutriens. Human culture is just a byproduct.
No idea if it's related but a comment about this talks about Toba's eruption. And fits into the 70k years ago
@ it’s very possible. That was an extremely challenging bottleneck for humanity. It could have acted as a strong pressure for humans to become more intelligent in a short span of time.
Much of this is debatable or outright incorrect.
Madagascar is outright incorrect. The *earliest* estimated dates of settlement range from -350 to 550. Furthermore, they were discovered from the East, by peoples from Indonesia that crossed the Indian Ocean. Yep. It was discovered by Polynesians from thousands of miles away, not peoples from Africa. And certainly not in the year -6000 or so. There is evidence that people may have found it earlier, but it is tentative at best with no signs of lasting human presence.
Furthermore, the timeline for the discovery of Iceland, the Azores, and New Zealand is highly debatable - there is strong evidence that Iceland was found in the 700s (carbon dating shows that the settlements/carvings/cabins, believed to be by Irish monks known as the Papar, were abandoned around the year 800). Also the Azores has evidence for settlement before the year 1000 by the Norse, likely blown off course. New Zealand is also debatable as it was discovered first from the northeast, not from Australia, and it was discovered 500+ years after Iceland not at the same time.
There are likely other errors I'm too lazy to look into, but these are the major ones that come to mind.
Wish they could see this right now, this data is actually correct and confirmed. I checked some history sites in case this was rubbish (it wasn’t lol).
Minor correction, people have been found in Australia since -66,000
Cool medieval music 🎉🎵🎶🎉
Do you now which type of music
@@FrenchFries-mo5vlAncient Egypt
+1
According to this New Zealand was the last major piece of real estate to be discovered.
there are traces of homo-sapiens in Brittany and Aquitania that date back from 70 000 BCE.. In South Wales and Cornwall in 40 000 BCE (although no presence found between 34 000 BCE and 11 000 BCE)
and no presence before 8 000 BCE in Soctland
it's not the most accurate of course. the expansion across the pacific islands was a bit too late in the timeline of the video as well
Fun fact 100 million people have been born sense this video came out
I base this off of the population number at the end and the current population counter
My biggest surprise in this video: 28,000 years ago, there were already humans in Chicago but not Paris.
hey that was TWO minutes :D I want my minute back!
you know the time when the human population dropped to 1000, damn that was 70k years ago!
Toba Eruption?
@@jaredjosephsongheng372 yupz the video wasn't accurate, 75k years ago toba volcano got eruption in Indonesia and almost killed all human population. Only 10k peoples has survived
So we're all inbred
@@BigBrotherTheWatcher1984 well kinda? there is posibility u can share some pieces of DNA with someone
People were in australia over 55,000 years ago. And people were in the Americas at least 20,000 years ago
Humans were in Australia as far back as 60,000 years according to some sources
Ah yes, France and Spain territories were full of dragons and giants, that's why humanity in Swizerland territory took 40,000 years to go there while the other part of humanity went to Australia and America first by walking
The oldest human remains found in Spain are over 1 million years old.
@@Wolfspaine7N6 NEANDERTHAL remains, not hominid sapiens
What does the negative number show 0:28
Before century
Before common era
Yeah it's year in BCE/CE -/+ format.
Before Christ
Year 0 is when earth lore gets crazy
Crazy to think that we haven’t even been around that long.
How do you know?
@@Quarequieus agreed on what you’re asking, but just going by the video.
This is well made. I enjoyed it and learnt from it.
Yall remember this? I remember myself killing a mammoth
While you were killing mammoths in Africa
I was in the Holy Land, building Jerusalem :P
@khandamiDEUS VULT
@@khandamix Mammoths in Africa lol
@@squidtard9629 I think you didn't get it
this sarcasm
@@khandamixstrange sarcasm but ok
Forgot the almost extinction event of about 50,000 years ago. About that time frame, humanity was cut down to a little 5,000-10,000 people world wide.
Aboriginals arrived in Australia approximately 50k years ago, not 26k.
cant believe we got these map updates so slowly, honestly the devs seem a bit lazy...
1:18 what happened to humans 😭
caseoh ate them
Respect for him for eating 100,000 humans then
Possible plague or sickness.
They entered fr*nce.
At this point, it must have been an ice age, since humans were crossing over to the Americas.
As others have suggested you seem to have missed the Toba population bottleneck, but you also have people in Madagascar 4000 years too early.
Thank you! I’ve been looking for videos like this!
ah hell nah bro I've been watching so much jjk content that at first I read this as Domain Expansion 😭
Domain expansion: cradle of civilization
So we can say the N word then ? 0:02
bro💀
Yeah
Only nwords existed then
Good question
@@Surya-en6bs Word is a word. I say it very often at my black friends even though I'm not black.
The population really explodes at the end there.
I see this video's been out for 10 months, but I'm still gonna comment. There is no speculation or anything, it's been discovered recently, but the Amazon was already inhabited by hundrets of thousands of people 20.000 BC or even earlier than that. They found giant like geoglyphs and roads in the west side of brazil, where they've been cutting down forests, and the carbon date of certain things there dates back very far. And there's still so much to be uncovered. The history keeps changing.
So technically , We are all ethiopians
Yes,but we evolve into civilized humans
@@scarymonster5541yeah we're basically an African species while neanderthal are native to Europe and Denisovan native to asia
@@squidtard9629 later on the neanderthal were massacred by the homo sapiens but for the denisovans scientists and historians doesn't know what happened to them
@@scarymonster5541💀
@@scarymonster5541 Your people teach lgbt ideology for Kids in the school and you call yourself civilized?
Как они посчитали всех людей до нашей эры
По письменным источникам и останкам. Писать люди умели и до нашей эры)
@@neurophonk ясно
Они также могут измерять уровни CO2, атмосферные изменения (в результате выращивания людьми продуктов питания), изменения ландшафта, костей и т. д. + Написания. Они также могут оценить численность населения на основе того, на что, как они знали, способно общество, исходя из количества зданий, которые у них были, и вещей, которые они построили - для достижения этого должна быть минимальная численность населения что.
Они могут измерять исторические уровни атмосферы, наблюдая за камнями и изменениями почвы с течением времени, а также окаменелостями.
1:16 was so hype they finally discovered the U.S.A.!
Back then, humans discovered entire continents and didn't know or care, today, if someone discovered a tiny sand atoll with absolutely nothing on it, the whole world would freak out
Good old times ❤
try using an Asia-centric map which is more fit to illustrate human expansion, instead an Europe-centric map.
Cry about it
How is this Europe centric?
Africa is literally the center focus here tho
@@blizyon30fps86the prime meridian runs straight through London. Europe is quite literally in the center of the map
In other words, putting Africa on the far left and America on the far right means we can our spread from left to right in one shot without needing to wrap around the edge. Until _very_ recently the Atlantic was a major barrier while the land-bridge across Alaska meant a pacific route was there early on.
This view is the classic view for European maps, which were drawn when Transatlantic expansion was the new big thing; but in terms of human expansion across all history, putting the Alaska bridge middle-right makes more sense since Transatlantic crossing is an ocean-jump anyways
They haven’t explored the corners yet? SMH 🤦
Bro the borders of the map won't let them
Those damn invisible walls!
we'll just wait until the flat Earth update everyone's talking about
I tried and it keeps saying "out of safe zone, please return in 10 seconds"
They somehow discovered Alaska and Oceania which are very far away from the starting point before Madagascar which is very close to the starting point
i dont think this theory is as accurate as we think. because i dont think hordes of humans who migrated into new lands didnt get around to know where they begun previously (or) didnt held any kind of communication with the lands which they inhabited previously. only way is there are multiple places where humans originated though it doesnt support scientifically.
Are you trying to say humans (homo-sapiens) evolved in multiple places in different times and just so happen in all cases to have similar enough DNA to reproduce with each other?
Africa is the cradle of human civilization. All human life started in east africa in modern-day ethiopia.
@@mohammad17770 Not true. Completely made up without any evidence beside some bones which some bozo dug up.
Out of Africa is outdated and incorrect.
There can't be multiple points of origin for a species. That would require that multiple close human ancestors spread around the world and then all these separate groups speciated in the exact same way completely independent of one another so that they coincidentally became more similar to each other than where they started despite having different environmental pressures.