One correction, if the geust dies they do not return to their world like in other souls games as the video states. They instead drop an effigy where they died and the host can choose to ressurect them in a rather lengthy process on the spot or the host dies and you both just respawn. Very simple and seamless.
This game looks so damn good but I’m just really hoping it feels good . That’s what is going to matter the most . Can’t wait to find out if it’s actually good
Good news for console players today! The devs dropped an FAQ on Reddit confirming both modes on console would be running in native 4k using “multiresolution techniques” to target 30 and 60 fps for each mode. We’ll see how launch goes of course but I will say I was very glad to hear this
why would anyone buy a game that does not run on 60 FPS min is beyond my comprehension. People are paying for the NEXT GEN consoles, yet developers give you trash..
@@FlatEarthPhotography Actually it's not the developers fault here but the console manufacturers. The ps5 is equivalent to a 2070 super, it's too weak to run an UE5 game that implements lumen and nanite at native 4k 60 fps. Just because Microsoft and Sony advertise next gen 4k it doesn't mean it's true all the way. It's why consoles get a ''pro'' version in the middle of their life cycle. People should be more realistic and expect 1440p 60 instead of 4k from a 2070s equivalent console when it comes to UE5
@@FlatEarthPhotography Exactly, don't trust the marketing, trust the numbers. Anyways with current upscaling technology looking so close to native personally I would gladly play any single player game on a console at 4k.
@@FlatEarthPhotography honestly I don’t have a problem with playing a game that runs at 30 as long as it’s stable. I just played ff16 in quality mode and it ran and looked great 99% of the time.
@@FibonacciUser-j2w You won't learn anything about the 2023 title by asking about the 2014 title. It's technically a sequel, but it's better to think of it as a reboot of the series. Everything about it has been redesigned from the ground up.
regarding the performance on consoles - I'm confused. On the chat on Reddit last friday the devs declared that both the performance and quality modes on consoles will run in native 4k res. In the video it says they confirmed that it won't. Which one is true?
@@Osyrousthe thing is that both quotes have come from the devs. At an interview a couple weeks ago they said console would be quality 30fps upscaled 1440 and performance 60fps upscaled 1080. Then on Friday during an AMA on the Reddit one of them answer question about performance and said both modes on console would be native 4k dynamic resolution. Sooo yea it’s kinda up in the air right now til they clarify wether the response on the AMA was a mistake or not
I have been a tester of the game for the last 8 months. Since the first time i entered the world 60 fps was a thing. There are 2 modes for console. Quality and Performance and a Fps boost for quality mode which is between performance and quality and runs at 40 fps instead of 30 while reducing the graphics just a bit. Its similar to Lies of P. I dont know how the pc version plays but i wouldn't think it wont have a 60 fps mode.
Nope, impossible. You'll need to go into umbral within the first 5 minutes of the game. A challenge run where you only play in umbral is possible, though.
@@Slayzo17 personally it’s not a glaring issue and doesn’t affect performance so I highly doubt they will do anything about it. Regardless I’m so damn hyped about this game. I already pre ordered and took the weekend off from work.
@@shish_taoukbro he was referring about a souls like thats inspired by the dark souls series. The OG lords of the fallen was launched the same year Dark Soul 2 was released. Of course it cannot be the first souls game.
Some of this stuff feels like it will make the game super tough. Like having chip damage whike blocking, and only being able to get it back by yanking their soul, attacking it, then attacking them again once the soul goes back to their body. That seems like a lot just to get health back. And from blocking at that. Why are all of these new souls-like games making you take chip damage from blocking? Makes no sense at all. At least Lies of P had perfect guard, and also let you get your health back with like one or two hits, along with buffs to reduce chip damage and more health regain when attacking. The “one bonfire per area in NG+ unless you have the stuff to make more” seems like even more artificial difficulty.
I don’t know where you talking about, LOTF give you much more ways to heal more then the majority of other souls games, not only you healing flask like darksouls but if you get hit you can get you HP back by hitting the enemy, even if that’s not enough you can rip their souls and attack that souls to get your HP back. Guess what? There is also a magic system with healing abilities, like, what more healing you want ?… For the damage you take even if you have your shield or weapons up is made so you can focus on specific builds instead of using the shield as a very cheesy way of playing extremely safe, it reward you for taking risk, if you want to focus on a shield build you have to find shields that negate more damage, you also have a parry mechanic much more forgiving then any other souls game.
Am looking forward to this game, but not buying day one. Have a few games to play already. The original LotF was a good game once it had been patched. I heard it was ropey on release and it got slated in reviews for it. By the time I played it, it ran flawlessly. Worth playing if you didn't already.
One thing I need and want to know is if you can mix armors like what I’ve read from the previous game is that you can only use complete sets of armors so if you are unable to combine armors then for me is a no for this game cause i like yo equip different boots and gloves and helmets and chest armor like in all previous like souls games
Normally im not interested of Dark Souls or Demon Souls souls like games but this Lords of the fallen looks really awesome game I've been interested of this since Gamescom 2023, Dark world looks beautiful defienitily I like world of dead umbral, character and monster designes are cool, battle system and mechanics are interesting. I have two platforms where I play Lords of the fallen and these are Xbox Series S or Pc, which is better I've been thinking playing this with my Xbox series S and big tv. That video was good thank you for these what to know details before you buy the game, Gamingbolt you are the lord of videogames. 🔥🔥
Why would this interest you when those don't? It's definitely a riff on Souls. I don't mean to downplay Hexworks' innovations, but it's fundamentally the same car, just a new coat of paint. Now that sounds great to me, but I can't in good faith recommend it to someone who isn't into Souls. It's 90% the same game.
@@La-Strangeryou can beat any of the souls games including bb in under 15 hrs easy, sometimes under 10. Dont take it from me tho, theyre just my most replayed games of all time
Developers estimated one playthrough to take 35-40hrs for typical Souls players. Which is on the short side, about the same as Bloodborne, but not bad. I also read that you can't do everything in one playthrough. The game has three endings, and apparently each one has some exclusive content. No telling how much though.
When focusing on the main objectives, Dark Souls III is about 32 Hours in length. If you're a gamer that strives to see all aspects of the game, you are likely to spend around 98½ Hours to obtain 100% completion.
I beat the original game and it was a rough experience and not in a good way. Truly, I hope it is a great game. Tbh it doesnt look that great to me so far. Have to wait and see and again I hope I'm wrong.
@@LordOfChaos.x I don't really like Ds2 either. I played the Scholar version once and then got rid of the game. I'm not one of those people that hate it but I new I would never play it again because I do see the major flaws holding the game back and found those flaws frustrating. I want them to remake ds2 like they did demons souls. And I have this opinion as a player that has played the soulsborne series a ton. Its my favorite video game series of all time no question as I have almost 2000+ hours in the games total and thats just a rough guess. It's just my opinion on Loftf and ds2. Like I said I hope the sequel is great.
someone correct this paid video, You only need to know: NEVER pre-order a game in this age. you will be disappointed. Wait for reviews before you waste your money
Tried 3 seperate times and made it about 25 - 29, hours each attempt. It's just janky, and punishing for no good reason. It's not fun. Irritating is a more apt description. Clunky, although beautiful. It gets a 4/10. Ill stick to Remnant 2.
@@EMO1tachi carried, no. I’d like to play co-op with a friend and it would be nice if both players received the same progression. What’s the point of co-op if only one player is benefiting? Might as well just made the game single player only.
@@jordank87you actually benefit from playing coop, your xp and anything you find will carry over to your campaign, they did this way because the majority of people asked for this because they where missing important part of the story on their campaign
Are you fucking kidding me ps5 quality mode is 1440p 30fps and the frame mode is 1080p 60 fps are we going back to the ps4 era with 900p resolution? This is why sony wants to release ps5 pro next year
It’s kinda up in the air right now because that quote comes from an interview a couple weeks ago but then this past Friday during an AMA on the Reddit one of the devs said console would be native 4k in both modes with dynamic resolution. Sooo yea…
I dont know what u are talking about but even the Xbox Series S will have a performance mode set at 60 fps and a fps boost mode in quality mode which runs at 40 fps instead of 30.
If you’re a company with investors,it’s kinda dmb to make a video game that hinders your audience because of game difficulty..You could easily just add an easy,normal,and hard mode.The souls games sell well,but imagine if it was easily accessible to casual players,their sales would more than likely triple.💯
@@OneTomato It is not accessible, it is too easy. I did a speedrun and finished it with my left hand, right hand tied to my left ear on an electric toothbrush. On batteries. In 23 minutes, no damage. Pfff.
The engine is set by default to render at 78% and has tsr enabled by default. Not even development can be done at native resolution. An empty level with 1 cube and 1 character reduces 20fps from the 120fps max just because of lumen.
Why hasn't there been a soulslike modern Castlevania? Seems like such an obvious thing.
Yea that does sound good.
ummm yes
That would sell like hot cakes.
It's called Bloodborne
Bloodborne was almost that for the first half
One correction, if the geust dies they do not return to their world like in other souls games as the video states. They instead drop an effigy where they died and the host can choose to ressurect them in a rather lengthy process on the spot or the host dies and you both just respawn. Very simple and seamless.
Or you can respawn them at the next Vestige.
Thank you. I heard it was seamless elsewhere so i was annoyed to hear it wasnt in this video
Lies Of P just Delivered. Lets hope Lords of the Fallen delivers as well
That would be my 1st purchase of a souls like game
my fingers are crossed hoping this game lives up to the hype and doesn't flop🤞
This game looks so damn good but I’m just really hoping it feels good . That’s what is going to matter the most . Can’t wait to find out if it’s actually good
Hope it's not too demanding on PC, but it might be since it's Unreal Engine 5.
It feels phenomenal. Performance on Medium for me is the same as Elden Ring on Ultra, but the game looks much better.
The umbrell system is dope it’s giving Soul Reaver 🔥
Good news for console players today! The devs dropped an FAQ on Reddit confirming both modes on console would be running in native 4k using “multiresolution techniques” to target 30 and 60 fps for each mode. We’ll see how launch goes of course but I will say I was very glad to hear this
why would anyone buy a game that does not run on 60 FPS min is beyond my comprehension. People are paying for the NEXT GEN consoles, yet developers give you trash..
@@FlatEarthPhotography Actually it's not the developers fault here but the console manufacturers. The ps5 is equivalent to a 2070 super, it's too weak to run an UE5 game that implements lumen and nanite at native 4k 60 fps. Just because Microsoft and Sony advertise next gen 4k it doesn't mean it's true all the way. It's why consoles get a ''pro'' version in the middle of their life cycle. People should be more realistic and expect 1440p 60 instead of 4k from a 2070s equivalent console when it comes to UE5
@@constantinesoldatos you have got a point. I should not be surprised... In this day and age, we are fed only lies from every corner
@@FlatEarthPhotography Exactly, don't trust the marketing, trust the numbers. Anyways with current upscaling technology looking so close to native personally I would gladly play any single player game on a console at 4k.
@@FlatEarthPhotography honestly I don’t have a problem with playing a game that runs at 30 as long as it’s stable. I just played ff16 in quality mode and it ran and looked great 99% of the time.
Really liked the original. Hopefully this one will be a banger
is it too difficult ? Heard it was very good except for some unbalanced bosses ? :: from a casual souls player
@@FibonacciUser-j2w You won't learn anything about the 2023 title by asking about the 2014 title. It's technically a sequel, but it's better to think of it as a reboot of the series. Everything about it has been redesigned from the ground up.
What was name of original game? I might check it out
@@rolandsl97 It had the same name.
@@FibonacciUser-j2w In the original there were maybe two bosses that I needed a guide for. Good game overall. Great even.
I absolutely cannot wait to play this game, but Lies of P is making the wait a little easier.
Armored core, lies of p, lords of the fallen... damn we gaming good this year.
@@robslams2324 We need to enjoy it while it lasts! Probably be pretty dry the next 2-3 years lol
Same here!!! I pre-ordered both like 2 months ago and Lies Of P was definitely worth it and is holding me over for now.
Same here👍
Was not expecting Lies of p to be this good
I find it weird that games haven't utilized Soul Reaver's world shifting mechanic apart from a single level in Titanfall 2 and Dishonored 2.
it's very hard to do a seamless transition between 2 overlapped levels
This will be a masterpiece
regarding the performance on consoles - I'm confused. On the chat on Reddit last friday the devs declared that both the performance and quality modes on consoles will run in native 4k res. In the video it says they confirmed that it won't. Which one is true?
Trust development over shit Hanes journos
Take the devs word at face value for now. This is just some randon dude on RUclips.
@@Osyrousthe thing is that both quotes have come from the devs. At an interview a couple weeks ago they said console would be quality 30fps upscaled 1440 and performance 60fps upscaled 1080. Then on Friday during an AMA on the Reddit one of them answer question about performance and said both modes on console would be native 4k dynamic resolution. Sooo yea it’s kinda up in the air right now til they clarify wether the response on the AMA was a mistake or not
I have been a tester of the game for the last 8 months.
Since the first time i entered the world 60 fps was a thing.
There are 2 modes for console.
Quality and Performance and a Fps boost for quality mode which is between performance and quality and runs at 40 fps instead of 30 while reducing the graphics just a bit.
Its similar to Lies of P.
I dont know how the pc version plays but i wouldn't think it wont have a 60 fps mode.
I wonder if there’s a way people can put together no umbral runs or if u have to die n go to umbral at some point in the game
Nope, impossible. You'll need to go into umbral within the first 5 minutes of the game. A challenge run where you only play in umbral is possible, though.
@@UltraStarWarsFanatic It's not possible.
The way the character is walking and running is funny 😅
That’s still one of the things I hope that gets fixed or adjusted. Looks like your character runs around with a pole infused to your spine.
@@dorian1593 But the problem is no one is talking and giving feedback about it so I doubt they will change it
@@Slayzo17 personally it’s not a glaring issue and doesn’t affect performance so I highly doubt they will do anything about it. Regardless I’m so damn hyped about this game. I already pre ordered and took the weekend off from work.
@@dorian1593 me also bro am so excited to play it 🔥
I honestly love it✨️🥵
i have a gtz 1070 can i run this? i figure i can t near high settings
This looks great, i hope it plays well.
First Lords of the fallen was first souls-like which was not made by FromSoftware.
What about online pvp?
I’m really nervous for this game. From some I hear it’s great and others I hear it’s kinda bad I’m a lot of ways. I just hope the combat is good.
heard pvp will be avaliable
The OG LOTF was one of the first soulslikes
And was dodo
@@2genders-tk2ue it’s in a competitive league nowadays, no free pass for dodo soulslikes
@@shish_taoukbro he was referring about a souls like thats inspired by the dark souls series.
The OG lords of the fallen was launched the same year Dark Soul 2 was released. Of course it cannot be the first souls game.
1080p ?????
I can't wait to play this. I hated the original one though lol😂 ngl
I never played the first one but this is a world of difference it seems
@stephenharper8450 yes. Indeed let me just be the first to say 😆 it is.
Entirely different dev team. I honestly think naming it the exact same thing was one of the most dumbass marketing strats I’ve seen in a minute.
I just figured out it existed.. looks like trash.. even by the standards of the day. This new one looks frickin epic though 🤩
Some of this stuff feels like it will make the game super tough. Like having chip damage whike blocking, and only being able to get it back by yanking their soul, attacking it, then attacking them again once the soul goes back to their body. That seems like a lot just to get health back. And from blocking at that. Why are all of these new souls-like games making you take chip damage from blocking? Makes no sense at all. At least Lies of P had perfect guard, and also let you get your health back with like one or two hits, along with buffs to reduce chip damage and more health regain when attacking. The “one bonfire per area in NG+ unless you have the stuff to make more” seems like even more artificial difficulty.
I don’t know where you talking about, LOTF give you much more ways to heal more then the majority of other souls games, not only you healing flask like darksouls but if you get hit you can get you HP back by hitting the enemy, even if that’s not enough you can rip their souls and attack that souls to get your HP back.
Guess what? There is also a magic system with healing abilities, like, what more healing you want ?…
For the damage you take even if you have your shield or weapons up is made so you can focus on specific builds instead of using the shield as a very cheesy way of playing extremely safe, it reward you for taking risk, if you want to focus on a shield build you have to find shields that negate more damage, you also have a parry mechanic much more forgiving then any other souls game.
Still play the 1st game possibly once a year, so much more gameplay and depth than FROMS copies, LOTF 2023 is on UE5 and looks beaut
Yeah the original was very good, had some issues that got fixed and a few that still need work, but overall a really good game that got overlooked.
Man that 25hrs length just turned me off that's pretty short 😏
Am looking forward to this game, but not buying day one. Have a few games to play already.
The original LotF was a good game once it had been patched. I heard it was ropey on release and it got slated in reviews for it. By the time I played it, it ran flawlessly. Worth playing if you didn't already.
Looks cool but can you jump though? I get they said dark souls 4.5 but I’d like the option to jump lol that’ll definitely be a deal breaker for me
Yes u can jump
Looking forward to this one, I hope its better than the first one!
One thing I need and want to know is if you can mix armors like what I’ve read from the previous game is that you can only use complete sets of armors so if you are unable to combine armors then for me is a no for this game cause i like yo equip different boots and gloves and helmets and chest armor like in all previous like souls games
You can mix armors. I saw the hud earlier and it had specific slots for each armor piece like the Fromsoft games
have i missed something i played this many years ago
This is a soft reboot (sequel) to the Lords of the Fallen (2014). So it will be quite different.
Yes you missed a lot
just like MK1 its a reboot of a game confusingly, with the exact same name
😂
Is this game is open world?
I'm pretty sure it's not. Elden Ring is the only one of these types of games that is a true open world.
Normally im not interested of Dark Souls or Demon Souls souls like games but this Lords of the fallen looks really awesome game I've been interested of this since Gamescom 2023, Dark world looks beautiful defienitily I like world of dead umbral, character and monster designes are cool, battle system and mechanics are interesting. I have two platforms where I play Lords of the fallen and these are Xbox Series S or Pc, which is better I've been thinking playing this with my Xbox series S and big tv. That video was good thank you for these what to know details before you buy the game, Gamingbolt you are the lord of videogames. 🔥🔥
Why would this interest you when those don't? It's definitely a riff on Souls. I don't mean to downplay Hexworks' innovations, but it's fundamentally the same car, just a new coat of paint. Now that sounds great to me, but I can't in good faith recommend it to someone who isn't into Souls. It's 90% the same game.
Having played the three Dark Souls games, DS3 is the best for first time I think. More accessible and forgiving.
Thank god its made on unreal engine
I hope the studio redeems themselves ... ive heard theres a little jank to the movement and combat we will have to wait and see
Upscaled 1080p!?!? On a PS5!?!? Unacceptable.
Bro this and lies of pi, are gonna consume my life ❤️
torn between this and Lies of P... decisions decisions...
This is better I getting both going play them on my ps5 if you have gamepass you can play lies of p on it I just got a ps5 and a Nintendo switch 😊
I'm getting this. Lies of P looks too empty to me. That seems like a deep sale game whereas this looks amazing (in my opinion)
I feel like lies of p will be a harder game.
Aye, after waiting patiently for Pinocchio to poke his nose--you're just gonna abandon he, b'y 😢
@@jdrahonovsky I know it may go on sale by next month
25-30 hours ? Really that’s a turn off for me I was about to buy it but 25-30 hours is not enough for 60-80 Euro game
Dark sous 1,3 and bloodborne have shorter hours. Probably 20-25
@@chicomaru what ? U must have played a different game brother
@@La-Stranger 🤷♂️
@@chicomaru alone on dark souls 3 I got over 80 hours don’t let me start on bloodborne Bro
@@La-Strangeryou can beat any of the souls games including bb in under 15 hrs easy, sometimes under 10. Dont take it from me tho, theyre just my most replayed games of all time
25/30hrs seems short……
Developers estimated one playthrough to take 35-40hrs for typical Souls players. Which is on the short side, about the same as Bloodborne, but not bad.
I also read that you can't do everything in one playthrough. The game has three endings, and apparently each one has some exclusive content. No telling how much though.
Thats longer than Dark Souls 3 which caps ar 18-24 hours.
When focusing on the main objectives, Dark Souls III is about 32 Hours in length. If you're a gamer that strives to see all aspects of the game, you are likely to spend around 98½ Hours to obtain 100% completion.
@@JoblessBuhddathats 32 hr claim is straight up hogwash🤣. Charleton ass mf
Im about to put 10k hours into LOTF pvp!
Jusy buy!
Only the host gets xp? Really?
I think they mean you get xp and items but only the host gets story progression
@@theobscured_one do you know about loot from bosses? Or chests?
I beat the original game and it was a rough experience and not in a good way. Truly, I hope it is a great game. Tbh it doesnt look that great to me so far. Have to wait and see and again I hope I'm wrong.
U aware the of loftf was released the same year Dark Souls 2 was released?
@@LordOfChaos.x I don't really like Ds2 either. I played the Scholar version once and then got rid of the game. I'm not one of those people that hate it but I new I would never play it again because I do see the major flaws holding the game back and found those flaws frustrating. I want them to remake ds2 like they did demons souls. And I have this opinion as a player that has played the soulsborne series a ton. Its my favorite video game series of all time no question as I have almost 2000+ hours in the games total and thats just a rough guess. It's just my opinion on Loftf and ds2. Like I said I hope the sequel is great.
@jrobb2118 I don't love Dark Souls 2, but I still really like it 7/10. The original Lords of the Fallen was like a 2/10 for me.
I dont know but i think games with unreal engine 5 are only good play in performance mode and not in Grafik mode. The next gens are to weak
There is a fps boost mode for quality mode which runs at 40 fps.
Cool
Ffs. Looked SO interesting but of course it has to be a souls clone -.-
What?
I think this will flop, but im loving lies of P
Game looks amazing. Combat looks clunky and kinda bad
Combat is amazing and it's really good
@@celphalonred1999how tf would you know
someone correct this paid video,
You only need to know:
NEVER pre-order a game in this age. you will be disappointed.
Wait for reviews before you waste your money
I have played the game so i will pre-order again.
But if i wouldnt have played it beforehand i wouldnt pre order.
the NG+ stuff seems pretty stupid IMO
kto nie kupi niech spłonie w piekle, Tymiński sprawdzaj co nagrałem
Tried 3 seperate times and made it about 25 - 29, hours each attempt.
It's just janky, and punishing for no good reason.
It's not fun.
Irritating is a more apt description.
Clunky, although beautiful.
It gets a 4/10.
Ill stick to Remnant 2.
In co-op only the host progresses, well that’s lame!
What you wanted to be carried or what
@@EMO1tachi carried, no. I’d like to play co-op with a friend and it would be nice if both players received the same progression. What’s the point of co-op if only one player is benefiting? Might as well just made the game single player only.
@@jordank87you actually benefit from playing coop, your xp and anything you find will carry over to your campaign, they did this way because the majority of people asked for this because they where missing important part of the story on their campaign
@@OneTomato ok that’s great to know, thanks!
new game plus sucks in this game... just extra difficulty? Noi extra loot, better versions of items etc.? All risk no reward
Are you fucking kidding me ps5 quality mode is 1440p 30fps and the frame mode is 1080p 60 fps are we going back to the ps4 era with 900p resolution? This is why sony wants to release ps5 pro next year
It’s kinda up in the air right now because that quote comes from an interview a couple weeks ago but then this past Friday during an AMA on the Reddit one of the devs said console would be native 4k in both modes with dynamic resolution. Sooo yea…
Bruh at least u aint getting 30 fps locked like in Starfield.
is every level foggy
Foggy groggy 😢
Cant wait to see the 500p 30 fps console version. Do not preorder!!!!
I dont know what u are talking about but even the Xbox Series S will have a performance mode set at 60 fps and a fps boost mode in quality mode which runs at 40 fps instead of 30.
If you’re a company with investors,it’s kinda dmb to make a video game that hinders your audience because of game difficulty..You could easily just add an easy,normal,and hard mode.The souls games sell well,but imagine if it was easily accessible to casual players,their sales would more than likely triple.💯
I present you “Elden ring” an accessible casual souls game
@@OneTomatoNo.
@@doubleohdutch2108 what you mean no ? 🤣
@@OneTomato It is not accessible, it is too easy. I did a speedrun and finished it with my left hand, right hand tied to my left ear on an electric toothbrush. On batteries. In 23 minutes, no damage. Pfff.
25hr Elden Ring cheap clone money grab, even crucible knight was copy and pasted, no thanks.
Dark Souls 3 was 18-24 hours yet u still bought it.
Devs said its a 40+ hour experience.
Yah.
Another souls like game...
U like? ;^)😊
as usual, no jump
kinda looks like no unreal engine 5 game is gonna run at true 4k than lol what a joke these consoles 8k my ass ps5💩
Wat u sayin, 🌞 😂😂😂
That 8k was so hilarious. When I saw that I was like, you won't even be able to pull off 4k. 😂
The engine is set by default to render at 78% and has tsr enabled by default. Not even development can be done at native resolution. An empty level with 1 cube and 1 character reduces 20fps from the 120fps max just because of lumen.
@@n1lknarf nobody cares dork
Bro I just want Elden ring DLC but this will have to do 🫥
Souls like I'm out!😂👊💯📠