Great update to a very versatile and travel friendly lens! Makes me consider upgrading my v1. I’d love to see the 100-400 ii soon; smaller, lighter, sharper?! Yes please!!! Oh and an arcaswiss foot.
I'm trying to decide between this 70-200 f4 ii + 1.4x or 2x teleconverter, vs the "single lens" Tamron 50-400. There are some compromises on each! The 70-200 would provide a solid f4 for when up to 200 is good enough, but the 400mm range now becomes an f/8. On the other hand, the Tamron provides a 400 f/6.3 (2/3s of a stop faster than the 2x combo), but only f/4.5 even at 50mm, so you penalize the more useful range for those moments where you absolutely need the 400mm. Obviously, the Tamron is half the price of the other combo, so that's that as well.
Yes, I'll buy the new Sony F/4: 70-200mm II macro lens. I'd most like to see Sony upgrade the 100-400 GM lens. Make it sharper, lighter and add the new motors, of course. The current 100 - 400 mm lens is decent but doesn't compare to the Sony f/2.8: 70 - 200 in terms of speed, weight and sharpness. I'd buy that upgrade, too. Thanks for an excellent review.
I'm very excited by this lens. I love macro and have the Sony 90mm which is excellent. I've the Sony 100-400 too which I love but I'm considering selling both those lenses and buying this. I've the x2 teleconverter so this lens would cover so much for me. It's small, light and very versatile. Very tempting indeed. When is it being released for sale?
Did you buy it? What are your thoughts on Sony 70-200 Gii x2 TC? Is it sharp, worth it? I’m thinking to get that combo using a full frame second base ISO 12,800
I suspect this lens will be sealed like the 100-400 (which has the same zooming mechanism) and that lens has been with me through some very dusty conditions and it is pristine inside after many years of travel and use.
Thank you Toby, you may have saved me some money. I had forgot about the crop mode. I own the 70-200 f2.8 and the 2x converter, so it was pretty clear that the 100-400 was not a need, but I questioned the 200-600. Will I need the extra 200mm given the limited use it would receive, in those situations I'll just use apsc. Running an A7R4 still have plenty of mp left even in apsc.
I understand that SONY may prefer releasing their lenses with no ARCA-SWISS collar, perhaps this makes more sense if used hand-held. However, why not sell separately an ARCA-SWISS replacement foot for users who may prefer that? That way, all existing lenses, like the 100-400, 70-200 GM etc can become ARCA-SWISS compatible simply by purchasing the optional foot!
Great update to a very versatile and travel friendly lens! Makes me consider upgrading my v1. I’d love to see the 100-400 ii soon; smaller, lighter, sharper?! Yes please!!! Oh and an arcaswiss foot.
A lighter, more compact 100-400 would be pretty amazing. I do think that is one that will be several more years before an update though :(
I'm trying to decide between this 70-200 f4 ii + 1.4x or 2x teleconverter, vs the "single lens" Tamron 50-400. There are some compromises on each! The 70-200 would provide a solid f4 for when up to 200 is good enough, but the 400mm range now becomes an f/8. On the other hand, the Tamron provides a 400 f/6.3 (2/3s of a stop faster than the 2x combo), but only f/4.5 even at 50mm, so you penalize the more useful range for those moments where you absolutely need the 400mm. Obviously, the Tamron is half the price of the other combo, so that's that as well.
Yes, I'll buy the new Sony F/4: 70-200mm II macro lens. I'd most like to see Sony upgrade the 100-400 GM lens. Make it sharper, lighter and add the new motors, of course. The current 100 - 400 mm lens is decent but doesn't compare to the Sony f/2.8: 70 - 200 in terms of speed, weight and sharpness. I'd buy that upgrade, too. Thanks for an excellent review.
I'm very excited by this lens. I love macro and have the Sony 90mm which is excellent. I've the Sony 100-400 too which I love but I'm considering selling both those lenses and buying this. I've the x2 teleconverter so this lens would cover so much for me. It's small, light and very versatile. Very tempting indeed. When is it being released for sale?
Preorder now - shipping begins August 11th.
Did you buy it? What are your thoughts on Sony 70-200 Gii x2 TC? Is it sharp, worth it? I’m thinking to get that combo using a full frame second base ISO 12,800
Great video, any interest in sharing your setting on the pics at 10:11, and 10:13. Really impressive.
Great review toby!
Thanks Dude! Much appreciated.
I am looking at this lens be good for landscapes and even better a macro lens. I wish they would update the 90mm macro lens 😊
How will this perform shooting high school football at night for video? Can something like the FX3 handle that?
love to see a 85 1.2 or faster. And not as heavy as the Nikon Noct in doing so.
I might have to switch from Canon to Sony!!
Canon's 70-200 f/4 is nice and compact too but not teleconverter compatible. Will be interesting to see if Canon really opens up the RF mount.
You’ll definitely love the number of affordable lens available for Sony. It’s the reason I left canon.
Any experiences with the f4 and 2x TC in wildlife and bokeh hit at f8? Tyvm :)
Did you buy it? I’m thinking about that combo too, specially with new sensor cameras with second base ISO at 12,800, I think 2x TC is worth vs x1.4
I don’t understand why the collar mount is not arca swiss compatible 😢
AGREEEED!!
is the zooming mechanism a dust vacuum outdoors, especially in windy conditions? Thanks.
I suspect this lens will be sealed like the 100-400 (which has the same zooming mechanism) and that lens has been with me through some very dusty conditions and it is pristine inside after many years of travel and use.
@@photorectoby just ordered. Thanks for the indo.
I have the 70-200mm OSS G lens mark 1. Does the lens hood fits on the mark 2 ???
I am sorry I didn't try but they are the same filter size so I expect it will fit.
Thank you Toby, you may have saved me some money. I had forgot about the crop mode. I own the 70-200 f2.8 and the 2x converter, so it was pretty clear that the 100-400 was not a need, but I questioned the 200-600. Will I need the extra 200mm given the limited use it would receive, in those situations I'll just use apsc. Running an A7R4 still have plenty of mp left even in apsc.
Happy to help!
I understand that SONY may prefer releasing their lenses with no ARCA-SWISS collar, perhaps this makes more sense if used hand-held.
However, why not sell separately an ARCA-SWISS replacement foot for users who may prefer that? That way, all existing lenses, like the 100-400, 70-200 GM etc can become ARCA-SWISS compatible simply by purchasing the optional foot!
Definitely the new sony