Retired judge says jury questions reveal more about mindset than length of time
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 июн 2024
- A retired judge said you can often tell more about a jury's mindset by the questions they ask rather than the time they spend deliberating. WBZ-TV's Brandon Truitt reports.
This case should have been sequestered
Rittenhouse took four days.
Thank you. I kept thinking of his trial! They tried to use his searching for representation as consciousness of guilt in that trial as well and the judge was so angry about that!
Over a month??? This has been a 9 week trial !
It can’t be easy for this jury
The O. J. jury only took four hours to let a murderer walk. So...
He was found not guilty. He’s not a murderer.😊
I think she’s guilty AND the cops are corrupt
😂 People are still simping for Darden and the mole-faced woman. Although she did make enough cash to have that mole removed. What's her name again? Oh yeah, Marsha Clark. Darden is the Fani Willis/ workplace romance every underling wants to be. 😂 Prosecutors are just Defense lawyers in training.
@@nateb5030 Was found guilty in a civil court
@@jlkitz1775the glove didnt fit. She admitted.
You mean “hos long”
Left out Rittenhouse in that comparison
They want us to forget about him
@@Veritas-inveniturin Rittenhouse case that judge was amazing. He said exactly what I’d want to hear to the prosecutor who tried to bring in consciousness of guilt re: Kyle searches for lawyer.
@@Veritas-inveniturthey want us to forget about the long jury deliberations that ended in a NG 🤷🏻♀️AND OJ don’t count either
Lally basically stated the jury is far, far from being finished with deliberating.
Im watching the movie THE DEPARTED, remember that one? Its a great movie about Massachusetts troopers working for gangsters. Out of all the USA cities, the director chose Boston. Now i understand why , state Police have reputation for corruption!
I don’t know why there are news segments speculating as to what the jury’s mindset is. Slow news week I guess. If anything, they’re doing their due diligence, as a jury should do when they have someone’s life in their hands.
They were instructed to go through all of the evidence and also gold to not to an jnitial vote when they were sent to deliberate.
Will there be a riot outside if she’s found guilty?
Objectively there's no way they can convict, that much was clear from the start
Not so sure …
@@81suze
There was no evidence and no manner of death.
@@SamStone1964Head pulverized or froze to death either way GUILTY
@@MaureenODonovan Just saying "or" you are implying reasonable doubt. The fact is the jury doesn't have a certain cause of death. To many posibilities.
@@MaureenODonovan
Head pulverised by what?
I love how you guys are just reporting on what the internet has already deemed interesting. You guys are a day late with all of your interesting facts
Your the only one racing 😂 come down bro p.s. she’s guilty
@melodieshimon Where's the evidence? There is definitely reasonable doubt. However, the prosecution has not proved their case 1 bit.
Not guilty
I don't believe she's guilty.
I don’t think so either. There’s evidence of the opposing side having done it. I think it was a drunken brawl gone wrong ending in a police cover up. Karen is by no means perfect, but she’s no murderer.
She's obviously not. Not a matter of believing. If you are aware of the evidence there is no evidence to suggest she did anything.
Then you are brainwashed or lack discernment because the physical evidence and vehicle data clearly prove that Karen Read killed John O'Keefe
Why didn’t you include any cases where they jury deliberated for a long time and came back not guilty? Great unbiased journalism 😂
Dam OJ jury only took 4 hours 😂
At her discretion to instruct the jury but she won't..
You don’t need to be a judge to understand this Jury is loony. It should have taken 5 minutes to find not guilty on all counts.
They would have to ignore the SERT team evidence found "completely buried underneath fresh undisturbed snow" that proves that Karen Read ran over John O'Keefe. Then they have to ignore her SUV vehicle data that confirms that she struck a pedestrian. Then they would have to ignore the 5:23 am voicemail message Karen Read left John as she drove by his body and chose to leave him to freeze to death alone a second time
The mcalberts sitting in front row looked very intimidating.
Yes. Take the pressure outside off. I keep saying it’s a lot of evidence and to testimony to go through. You can’t jump right to end with the one day of defense experts. They have to challenge 8 weeks of the states materials. Rome wasn’t built in a day.
I'm afraid of a hung jury...
A hold out!
She's Innocent.
Free Auntie Bev! She’s tired!
You mean judge sustain
Nobody knows? How about juror who contacted his relative?
How much pay for a juror?
Hey can’t this man stay still. Strange
Strange that you needed to mention it ?
He was itchy 😂
He's excited, thinking about your mum.
You don’t have to tell us that we are fools
ABSOLUTELY NOT GUILTY!!
Bet the jurors afraid and will have a guilty verdict they live an$ work in and around there .
Did they ever present the blood that was found on the undercarriage of her SUV and the logs of her putting the car in reverse pressing down in the accelerator of up to 24 mph?
The blood found on the undercarriage that was his blood is what did it for me
At least if she goes to jail no kids will be left behind
Innocent ❤
This jury is scaring me. If they are going over the " lack of evidence " then she will be found guilty.
What do you mean lack of evidence to prosecution has no evidence
@@eileencalabro7909 Exactly. Commentators are saying the jury is going over the evidence and my point is, what could they be going over since the state didn't produce evidence of her guilt, i.e. lack of evidence.
Guess they are confused because of the not guilty box on the verdict form? Jk
❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😮😮😮😮😮
It took many of the public conspiracy likers half to three quarters of trial to come to their senses. The jury has to go the same paces and catch up.
IF jurors paid attention and took copious notes, as they should have, doesn’t take this long to render verdict.
It may if they find her guilty
Guilty of manslaughter
CW did not prove beyond reasonable doubt manslaughter!
@@bonniemccrane6417she admitted it. Many times to many ppl.
Trump’s guiltily verdict on 34 felony counts took about nine hours.
Yet he's free for Jan 6.
@@mortalclown3812 Blame Pelosi
What did trump do now
Giving Lally a taste of his own medicine with boredom
The jury needs to get it right! All evidence points to the defendant!
I haven’t seen Any that does. It will be a grave miscarriage of justice if she is found guilty or has a hung jury.
The Prosecution did not prove their case. She is factually innocent
@@a.j2603she admitted it many times to many ppl
@@sheenaburton4738she admitted it many times to many ppl
POINTS to the DEFENDANT NOT GUILTY, there's not one shred of evidence that she ran her boyfriend over get it right.
There is so much that proves her guilty! THE COPS AND FRIENDS DID NOT!!! BEAT HIM TO DEATH! THE DEFENCE BROUGHT UP CONSPERANCY, THEY JAD NOTHING ELSE'!!!! THINK ABOUT IT, IF THE DEFENCE NEVER BROUGHT CONSPERACY. TO SEE HER FREE IS SICKENING! JOHNS FAMILY IS SUFFERING AGAIN!!!!!!!😢 DEFENCE SAYING EVERYONE!!! ON THE STAND LIED!!!
A few jury members are on the take
I hope not
Do tell
I’m sure somebody knows somebody on that jury and the6 will find her guilty because they’re afraid or is biased
GUILTY
Let me see, you sit in court listening to both sides and then you go back to see more of the same of what you just heard. I'm sorry but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the lies and disturbing judge to make the case a guilty verdict. The system in this case is broken.
I don’t think we are dealing with rocket scientist here
@@timhoneycutt1367 I can see that not even common sense.
I'm not sure what trial you were watching. But the prosecution did not show any EVIDENCE that she's guilty whatsoever. The prosecution's own witnesses have actually helped the defense, to be exact. The trooper who did the leaf blowing testified under oath that there was no TAILLIGHT pieces , Were OJO'S bidy was licated.the second witness, SERGEANT BARROS HAS testified that there was no broken pieces of her tail light that it was only cracked, the only witnesses who lied or the ones that were involved were lying so I don't know where you mind is going with guilty🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️ Thank God you're not on a jury. I've been on one, and I know why it's taken them too long because they probably have more not guilty, and 1 or 2 are saying guilty.
@@eileencalabro7909 I'm sorry you don't comprehend, however, what was meant is that it looks as if the judge wants a guilty verdict. Yes, I myself worked for a courthouse as a deputy circuit clerk.
The jury will realize all those house witnesses were grilled only to.get timeline help and offered up info. The parent okeefes did not testify and she called daddy for help at 1:00 AM hour. She was in ttrouble trying to run and fix things in a small town in a short period of time. The small wild animal came after death and or the tail light damage. Karen changed her story so much and drank way to much. If she had a concience she would have fessed up while in trial. She has confessed already, soo. Shes right about something. It has been much tax payer and time potentially wasted, unless some miracle of justice happens here. I dont envy the jury, but am glad they are apparenrly well invested in the task.
Calling her dad is proof? 😂 Who wouldn't want to call their dad after that traumatic event.
@@judykincaid4066 correct. she killed him.
@@Gle7799 no she didn't. Follow the EVIDENCE. From EXPERTS.
@@judykincaid4066 experrts?? What a joke
@@Gle7799 you've got to be a troll. Those were some of the most qualified and highly intelligent professionals I've ever seen. True experts in their fields.
The jury has a lot to look at but the state knocked down EVERY piece of misinformation from the defense and their mouth pieces. She said she hit him. 🎤 drop
To the family of Officer John O’Keefe and his family, they deserve justice !!! Read is guilty!
In the eyes of the corrupt. Karen Read is innocent. The guilty ones are still walking.
@@Barbe194 she is guilty.
@@kathiemarie I'm sorry sounds to me you have no logic or comprehension, however, I do hope Karen is found innocent and the guilty ones will get charged with the crime that was committed inside the house.
@@Barbe194 ok
@@Barbe194 i comprehend just fine. She is guilty
Making sure Guilty is the correct verdict.
Women hating women
The evidence points to not guilty
You must have not watched this trial in full to come to your conclusion. 😢
@@pinkpearl9208
Jen McCabe is that you?
Guilty.
Women hating women
12:36 Karen's phone hooked up to Johns WIFI, everyone left Albert's around 1 am. They didn't see John on the Lawn. So when did the vehicle hit him? Multiple times in the face and head?
@@justinshades6652Apparently KR had custom taillights. It comes with fists, dog teeth and shards of glass. The best part is that they even come with the ability to put itself back together 🤦🏻♀️
@@martineekchanney 🤣🤣🤣🤣Yup
Yep his cop and atf friends are because they did it
Karen is guilty!
Hoping for the maximum sentence allowed, for Officer John O’Keefe and his family, they deserve justice !!!
Yeah the facts say otherwise. You need PROOF. Name ONE piece of direct evidence that John was even hit by a car! Much less her car. There is none. Laws of physics says it's impossible. Medical professionals too. What trial are you watching.
Did we watch the same trial?
@@SavvyMuhon apparently not if you’re questioning!! go back and rewatch
@@Liljodi
Rewatching, still a ton of reasonable doubt
@@SavvyMuhon realizing that the police did an absolutely terrible job investigating this crime, had they went into the house at 34 Fairview Karen would be in prison!!
I don’t think the theory of John being beaten in the house is plausible though considering he was 6‘2“ tall and well over 210 pounds and he had no defensive wounds?? As a matter of fact, he had no other persons DNA on his body , how does that happen if he’s attacked?? I’ve watched this entire trial and I honestly feel like Karen is the only One who could’ve committed this crime, technology (meaning her phone and her SUV) tracked her entire moves of the night of January 28 th and the early morning of January 29.
Not to mention the fact that John O’Keefe’s cell phone was underneath his body from the time that Karen dropped him off in front of the house!! he never moved from that spot.
I’m anxiously awaiting the verdict! I do hope Karen is held accountable though!
Day after day, we’ve watched her smile and smirk & laugh with her attorneys this shows her character and the fact that she could do that right in front of John O’Keefe’s family is disturbing to say the least!
Not guilty