@@buddha2845 I think u guys are hopeless sometimes Even after looking stats and historical relationship of buddim and Hinduism Neo buddisht are brainwashed By jihadhi organisations Jai meem _bhim is a historical biggest mistake
sanatan hindu dharma based on which buddhism was born. because rebirth, dhyan, daya, daan, karuna, dharma, karma, bhikshu way of life, etc are all hindu practices which is used/stolen by Buddhist and created their own religion. its like stealing our things and calling it their own. it makes absolute sense if they merged both into one. a real enlightened being is the one who unites not the one who divides. gautam buddha created divide he was not fully enlightened. he had a blind spot on dividing people. if you create divide it will create competition and competition has less positive but most negative side.
@@Yogis_BitterTruth_NirvanGautum Buddha created that divide due to the strict caste system of India. Also, stealing ideas would mean taking ideas and not giving credit to the people you took it from. Gautum buddha made adjustments to hinduism and they believe that that makes it different enough from hinduism to classify as a different religion. This is THEIR way a thinking. Being someone that believes in sanatan dharma, you should respect that or debate their ideas if you don't think they're right, not try to delegitimize their leader by a simple "not enlightened" statement. Also: Even most buddhists recognize that Gautum Buddha was born a Hindu
Moral: No matter how much you try to preach absolute peace and non-violence, in reality you cannot survive without fighting and blood. And, that was the reason why Hinduism survived. They knew how to fight in the time of need even with a thousand cuts.
It's true only for India and Central Asia. Srilanka Myanmar Thailand Laos Cambodia and Vietnam survived the onslaught. Net results from macro point of view I think that what sect one followed mattered a lot. The same Turks who were Buddhists in 7th century became muslims and destroyed viharas and temples 2 generations later. We do not know what sociological changes Islam brought about in the Turks.
@@rushikborad4802 but budha never said he is against sanatan or veda are fake he never said against m, also he never established new religion his follower gain power through religion
@@sriramkumar9534 As a buddhist i have researched about hindu god Krishna and buddha.Some moral of the advice are same.Their are some similarity between them.
@@niloyhirok7044 yea especially the cosmology its soo similar as well as the cycle of reincarnation and achieving motsha/nirvana just the path is different
Betraying King Dahir of Sindh was the FATAL blunder by Buddhists. He was a very brave king and the last Hindu king of Sindh. He fought bravely ,his wife also fought bravely. Had Buddhist monks not betrayed him ,they would have still been in existance in Sindh and punjab and in other parts of India. But I like Buddhism, though I'm Hindu .
@@siddharthshekhar909 Must be Hindu kings started it. Why fight over history. Its clear Buddhists and Hindu kings didnt trust each other and invited Arab traders and became prey. And later the colonials. All os for human evolution when one keeps failing the other and THE PARASITES could make use of the rivalry to come to power like the British and Muslims, and still we are fighting in Democracy. Where Values are most endangered in an environment of complete freedom and especially weaker masses in society have chance to elect its leader. Clearly a total democracy is a failing ideology for people to become MOST SELFISH AND VALUE LESS
Most of the Hindus supported the expansion of Buddhism and still respect Buddhism. Buddhism was also protected by Hindu kings as Buddhism is against violence. Fall of Indian kings resulted in the downfall of Buddhism. Non compromised form of Buddhism is one of most difficult religion to follow and most peaceful. Hindus never stopped resistance during Invasion that's why it's survived.
Hindus accepted Buddha as reincarnation of one of their gods. I'm Buddhist and I usually visited to Ram temple in 51st. Rangoon, Burma in childhood days. I asked why Buddhist statute is in the temple and the Hindu priest said Buddha was reincarnation of their god. Then I migrated to Europe. About 2 decades later, I visited to Burma and dropped to that Ram temple. Still there Buddha statute with more lights and decorations. I donated money to that Ram temple. I dropped that Ram temple in 2004, 2013, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 (then no more due to Covid pandemic, if all Covid pandemic ease down then I'll visit to that temple again and donate money).
@@54living yeah that's true many of Vaishnav sects of hindus believe that Budhha was 9th avatar of lord vishnu. that's why we treat Buddhism as another sect of hinduism and treat Buddhists like our brothers. We respect them as they chose the path of non violence and peace.
*Believe me... Earlier there was nothing like RELIGION called Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism 😂😂... They were all ways of culture, pilgrimage, respect to nature, worship... Buddhism, Hinduism were living in harmony...Hindus only use to practice buddhism & Hinduism together. There was no hard & fast rule. Everyone knows whoever lives together also quarrels sometime but there was never any sentiment against each other. Everything started after abrahamic religions started to invade.*
Budhism.made Indian weak and Indian forgot their nature of fight Buddhism made them baggers so islam easily invade Indian Hindus kings still fought them
. BUDHA clearly rejected VEDHAS and VARNA system, The WORK should be distributed based on Efficiency, Skills and Interest Not by THE CASTE . And clearly said do not worship materialistic things , do not worship blindly what you know Not . Here all Hindus worship materialistic and blindly worships what they not know. The demolition of Buddhism started in nearly BC 300 the only rivalries Buddhism Jainism charwahanas vs vedhic religions.
@@loveki5369 - There was no conversion in Buddha dharma, because Buddha was another Sanatana line Rishi. He called Himself as Angirasa in Atanatiya Sutta. People followed Him. Buddhism was made by Vedics by calling it Non-Vedic because the truth of Buddhism is Shunyam as the background of Brahman of Vedas. According to Vedic dictum one who crosses the Brahman reaches Nasti or Void is called Nastika.
@@kulavadhutasatpurananda93 Pls dont try to add old BUDDHIST SCRIPTURE terms in a practical modern world. Nastika in current Material wirld meant ATHEISTS who didnt even believe any Karma and Dharma existing like the western Materialists(which is important in context of war of RUSSIA-UKRAINE AND NATO as a war in the beginning, for reviving back Dharma in order to exist). Pls utter anything only when u know practicality. For ex, even BUDDHIST MONKS even supported RAJAPAKSA blindly to come to power as president in srilanka which forced Srilanka, to come under BILLIONS OF DOLLARS DEBT forcing a threat of COMMUNIST CHINA rule just like in Tibet or Myanmar now, there. Its hard to make out who is better practically now. Even Dalailama or CCP in the current world. CCP is even supported by its own ppl and even able to challenge western supremacy which the LAZY old fashioned BUDDHISM as has been understood till now has been failing to do the same, looking at even capitalist and western culture influenced countries like Japan or South korea as well,compared to CHALLENGES being posed by countries like NK, CHINA OR RUSSIA towards the COMPLETELY MATERIALIST absolutely Non-Dharmic ATHEISTIC WEST (OR EVEN EUROPE) as a way of ideology and as a way of some Trust also on Dharma (equivalent to BUDDHA DHAMMA used by Buddha himself, with an intent for Human evolution in a ethical way).. So pls be practical, not just use theoretical terms found in Buddhism. Most ppl dont even know their Hindu roots. Wat they speak and can understand of Buddhism in a communist way as better way of rule, over the way of Democracy or Hindu beliefs, which are either more old fashioned or opportunistic either way.
Hindu Shaivist scriptures were written in Tamil more than 2000 years ago, but it should acknowledged that Tamil Shaivism had it's roots in Kashmir Shaivism. It's said that sage Agasthya brought it to TN. Even now Agasthya is revered here in TN The concepts of Tamil Shaivism spread and were accepted in central and north india. Pandits of Varanasi are aware of this. We tamilians should be grateful to Chatrapati Shivaji, because he largely stopped further onslaught of the Mughals into south India.
Are tamilians really following hinduism?.. many earlier hindus seems to accept christianity and islam morw easy these days... as a protest against brahmanas and due to dravida political parties and also due to christian missionaries... have seen brahman christians from tamilnadu
@@deepblue3682 all those Dravidian extremists are secretly Christians Hinduism is still alive and thriving in Tamil Nadu at least in the northern and eastern Tamil nadu
No Tamil Shaivism is there in north, it was the north who spread Hinduism in south. Shaivism in Varanasi and kashmir are more than 3000 years old and can be even older if the research be done seriously. But Tamilians have contributed a lot in spreading Hinduism in south east Asia. I read somewhere some Tamilians even tried to sell a theory that lord Ram was actually from Tamil Nadu 😂
I'm born to a Hindu Family of Brahmins. My parents named me - "Siddharth", Because they liked the name and it had relation to Buddha, My mother despite being a Hindu is an Admirer of Buddha ever since her childhood. This is how much we Hindus respect Buddha even today continue the tradition of preserving Buddhism in India, I want to give my Child a Buddhist name too. I have always felt closer to Atheism and Buddhist Philosophy than my Hindu faith. But unlike a few Nasty people, I won't go around calling out one Faith as Nasty and another Faith as Great. All Religions are Beautiful in their own way, This is what my Great Hindu Civilization teaches us. Buddha never humilated, Mocked or talked less of any Faith. Rather than be Negative, he taught only Positive things in Life.
Exactly same for me too. My father changed my name to Siddharth and admired Gautam Buddha. We were never taught or tutored about any distinction between Sanatan Dharma and Buddhism by my parents. Though Nehrus books did try to create a division.
You start from Persia. Then you will understand. It became easier to attack unarmed people. Outside the core Persian Zoarashtrian Territory was all Buddist areas where unarmed people lived, From Afghanistan. Core Zoarashtrian territory fell and within 25 years entire Persian empire fell. There was no back up. It was senseless to be extreme peaceful.
@@lll2282 Persia and Hindustan were two sister countries. Persians mostly stood as a wall. The Persian concentrated up North and confronted earlier the Greeks and later Romans. They were sure of no attack from Hindustan. Yes Agni ( Fire) . There was respect for the Cow as we both had good sustainable agriculture system. Bullocks for ploughing and carting. Cow for milk, curd ghee. Urine and dung as manure
As a Buddhist from Thailand. It had never occur to me before that Buddhism is an expensive, high-maintenance religion. And that the economic stability in the region would be such a big factor to the survival of the religion. So big that leads the Buddhist benefactors to betrayed the ruling class and destroyed itself in the process.
Yeah, everyone seems to forget that Siddhartha's popularity has a lot to do with his royal celebrity status who's mind blowing choice made him a topic of conversation forever slowly changing his philosophy to a religion. All static philosophies can only exist in the "season" of their respective countries. Like you can only talk about sleeping outside in the summer... That idea will get you killed in the cold winter. This flaw in Buddhism is why the ruling class (who are taught extensive regional history) would try to destroy it. That's not how to deal with flawed logic though, only education can fix that
@@L3onking his name is SUKETE not Siddhartha Sidharth is a Sanskrit name made by bhramins 10 avatar of lord Vishnu ! this is how bhramin s turned budh into hindu and captured all budh statue n temple by hindu
Very true but even according to Lord buddha not everyone would follow damma and for stopping sinner you have to indulge in voilence that's why martial arts was created in India ☺ but half knowledge is worse than no knowledge and also they got corrupted they became greedy and so they paid the prices although it's sad because it's a branch of hinduism n lord buddha is always worshipped in our (hindu) houses as any other god on the day of buddha purnima my mother prepared sweets and offered to Lord don't think buddhism is vanished it still exists in form of hinduism although not as pure as it was but it does exists ☺
Brilliant work. One whole kingdom of Buddhist Maldives were converted to Islam by a Moroccon Muslim and the citizens did not even fight. A very large percentage of Indian Subcontinent Muslims were Buddhists. Also the converts of Afghanistan had more hatred towards Buddhism since they were also former Buddhists. Adding - I'm editing my comment, I was not aware that the monks were beheaded and Monasteries were destroyed, it is verified. The citizens did protest. But the king had political advantage so he persuaded. The convertion was not peaceful.
Persian and Roman collapsed within 100 years of islamic attacks but Hindus survived even after 1000 years of brutal rule of foreign warlords , this is because our Sanatan dharma and the sacrifices by millions of hindus .❤❤
My entire caste was Buddhist for almost six hundred years ! But we came back to Hinduism as the then Buddhist leadership refused to fight the invaders . Today we as a caste are nearly 1.2 crores in population . We remember and cherish our past Buddhist association and still respect Buddha .
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian. BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
@@amalksuresh286 he said they were Buddhist for 600 yrs, means he is from north east india probably. Buddhist never refused to fight back the invaders. History is being presented wrong. When invaders like bhaktiyar khilji came to Bihar and Bengal there was no any Buddhist empire,as it was taken over by Hindu sena Dynasty. Pala Empire was the last Buddhist Indian Empire which was ended before the foreign invasion.
Which Buddhist leadership please be specific? Don't make stuff up because there was no Buddhist leadership at the time Islam arrived. Brahmanism had already destroyed every Buddhist leadership in western India.
My take is - Before Buddha, Hinduism was widely called “Dharma” for thousands of years!And Buddha wasn’t against Hinduism if he was, he wouldn’t have called his preachings with the same name “dharma”. He only gave different interpretation of dharma in the age old traditions of India. It seems like it only became a different “religion” when it was politicized by Kings like Ashoka later.
Siddhārtha Gautama is Buddha's real name, he was a prince of a Hindu kingdom, but later became a yogi and achieved awakening, Buddha was a Hindu and that's why much of this teachings coincide with Hinduism. It was people much later that turned his teachings into a different religion.
In Nepal the Buddhist flourished and became the part of our identity. Most Hindu temples have statues of Lord Buddha and Many Stupas also have other deities and temples. Buddhism and Hinduism merged and a new beautiful culture developed and has been flourishing in our country.
Actually India hindus also worship buddha and belive in buddha ...You can buddha statue in hindu household and books of teaching of buddha.....But you know how indian politics works 😂
I am from Europe. This video confirmed my impression that buddhism has favoured the development of islam by stupid ingenuity and by complete absence of military appropriate answer to these invaders.
Thank God that we, hindus remained hindus and didn't convert to buddhism before otherwise we would had been wiped out by now. Every non-abrahamic religion should follow the teaching of Lord Krishna and should take arms to fight for adharma. This is the philosophy of life.
buddhism is not about believing buddha as deity. but following the teachings of buddha. you can believe in whatever you want. but if you are not practicing the teachings. you are just calling youself buddhist, like you can call yourself spiderman, superman, gandhist, feminist whatever you like to be called.
In the arab invasion the worst thing that happened that is the knowledge that we lost, which was written by hindu and Buddhist monks. Unfortunately it is nearly impossible to regain that 😞 I also want to add that sikhs did the fantastic work in following spirituality with the power to protect themselves and also protecting hindus in their kingdom.
Buddhism is not for 4legs. GOD Buddha knew this 3000 years ago and he left India before passing away. It's almost impossible to teach 0-4legs/ to be a MAN. Just DO 123 in command by 4LEVELS. The ultimate TRUTH is here for MAN. I got HIM then I never ever believe in any RULE/BOX:- god, edu, IT +++ Do not worry about Buddhism, HE do need nor QTY.
@@GreaterAfghanistanMovement might want to read about Unmayad Caliphates disastrous expeditions into South Asia after the fall of Sassanid Iran in 651.
@@Tenisinspector8341 That was just Sindh which doesn't even constitute more than 5% of India. And Qasim was defeated by a local Hindu Raja which means Islam never took a foothold in the Indian subcontinent at the time. Islam didn't arrive centuries later with Ghaznavi and Ghori.
@@urgenlama7302 But they could not vanish Hindus. Still India is Hindu majority country. And muslim ruled whole India is a myth. Only some parts of India specially Northern India were ruled by them. Whenever fruitful situation we got we Hindus always retaliated, rebelled.
not in indian but 90% asian nation are buddhist atheist country,...buddha said there is no god ...and most of the chinese are lyman buddhist ...chinese govt only hate monk buddhist because they left their family...but its good to be lyman buddhist...in japan our great king boddhidhamasn ideoly zen buddhism was spread.....japan,korean, china ,thailand,indonesia,mongolia,myanmar,laos,combodia,vietnam,srilanka,bhutan,taiwan,tibet .....only india,pakistan,afgansitan buddhism decline because of our peacefull community, hindu king puspanand sungh...and pan asiatic buddhist were currupted ...than other
@@bi-xaalbora3724 Buddhist doesn't believe in Creator Capital "GOD".but according to Buddhist cosmology there 31 realms of existence and there are heavenly realms too but none of them are creator god and they are too subject of death and birth.
I'm from Telangana, I trace my origins back to Animistic Hinduism , and during 2st to 10th century ce , we were into budhism influenced Hinduism , and also had some jain influence, and we were into Traditional Hinduism today , but budhism had a large impact on the Telanganan society , but the interesting thing is budhism dint wiped out the existing Hinduism, but it was integrated into it
@@deepblue3682 No , 98% of reddy's in Telangana are Conservative Hindus , but in Andhra , coastal reddys were the first people to get converted by Britishers ( there are 6 or 7 generation Reddy Christians ), but still majority of Reddys are hindus , and kannada and North West telanganan reddys are super Conservative
@@apatriot4400 they not only intermarried but they were the same people, often converting from one to another based on what they preferred philosophically. Back then people changed philosophical beliefs very easily. Not as ridgid as they are today.
*_The Ashok Syndrome:_* *An interesting article by a Retd Army Officer:* 👉 In India, it's never about Ideology.. It is only about Civilisation.. 👉 And to put it on record this is why PM Modi faces a massive smear campaign from a powerful Lobby.. 👉 But this did not start in 2014.. It started long ago, we have to go back by Centuries to understand this.. 👉 India wasn't born in 1947, because unlike many other Countries we got Independence and were not created afresh.. Therefore, what happened *before* 1947 is as important as what happened *after* 1947.. 👉 The most underrated event in our History being the *Kalinga War* of 265 BC.. 👉 The War changed Ashok, the famous Mauryan Ruler but it also change India for centuries to come.. 👉 The Emperor became Pacifist.. Whatever be his own ideology, it is very easy to confuse reluctance to wage War with a senselessly defensive mindset.. 👉 For years to come, the Indian Civilisation became utterly defensive.. 👉 Succeeding Indian Dynasties and Emperors would avoid expansionism.. 👉 But their ability to perceive and pre-empt threats also went down.. 👉 Compromise and Forgiveness became the keywords of our Civilisation.. 👉 The Ashok Syndrome would soon become the Prithviraj Syndrome.. 👉 Indians have been valiant Warriors, but the issue is that of excessive magnanimity.. Prithviraj Chauhan defeated Muhammad Ghori in the 11th century, but let him go.. Later, Ghori defeated Prithviraj and blinded him.. 👉 In the course of this thread, you will realise how we would keep getting betrayed just like Prithviraj Chauhan another 10 Centuries later.. 👉 Anyway, Prithviraj Chauhan's unnecessary magnanimity allowed Islamic conquest of India.. 👉 This, of course, led to Centuries of plunder.. 👉 After the Kalinga War, we never achieved a system that would match up to the aggression against Indian Civilisation.. 👉 The unnecessarily defensive regime would give way to Islamic conquest, and Islamic conquest would give way to the British Raj.. 👉Needless to mention, the Social thinkers and commoners also became timid about their own Civilisation.. 👉 Britishers made us believe that we were Misogynist and Archaic.. 👉 Some of our most celebrated Social thinkers relentlessly promoted British Education as a Panacea.. 👉 As I told you, everything is about Civilisation.. Every successive regime shamed anyone who tried to stand up for civilisational pride.. 👉 British era gave way for the Nehruvian Era.. India's Political leadership again ordained that India would adopt strategic restraint.. 👉 China entered our Territory.. So, India's first Prime Minister said, "not a blade of grass grows" in those Barren Mountains.. 👉 Of course, no one in the intellectual lobby protested.. Nehru was doing what they wanted him to do.. Be magnanimous to the extent of being self- harming.. 👉 Nehru was only continuing what started with the Kalinga War.. Then came Indira.. She suffered the Prithviraj Syndrome.. Won the 1971 War, but gave away the exploits in Shimla Agreement.. 👉 Pakistan turned another Ghori.. ISI came up with a Doctrine - bleed India through a thousand cuts.. 👉 This doesn't end here.. Vajpayee faced the wrath of the Eco-system for many reasons.. The only thing they don't criticise him for is not crossing the LoC during the 1999 Kargil War.. This is again a manifestation of extreme generosity.. Pakistan could cross the LoC but India would not.. 👉 The Parliament attack happened, we didn't retaliate.. Operation Prakram never materialised into anything.. 👉 Few years later, 26/11 happened.. But India's then PM Manmohan Singh chose, "Strategic restraint.." 👉 No one in a Powerful Lobby criticised him.. 👉 As long as you don't go beyond the Lakshman Rekha that has been drawn by Centuries of timidity, no one will rebuke you.. 👉 But then came PM Modi on the stage..! Pakistan attacked in Uri, so the Para SF caused damage to Terror Launchpads across the LoC.. 👉 With the Balakot Airstrikes, he still went several steps further.. 👉Of course, he is hated.. 👉 After several Centuries, India is pre-empting threats.. 👉We had stopped pre-empting in 265 BC, how come we could pre-empt now.. 👉 Modi-hate is not about ideology, it’s about Civilisation.!! 👉 I wish and I hope that this Modi succeeds in transforming our mindset for the other Modis' to follow the suit, because one Modi will not be sufficient enough to clear the rot accumulated through Centuries.. *(This is a very well articulated post of Siddharth Gautam)* Interesting......some Food for thought... for Indians.
Literally, The great Ashoka huh. He was such strong Emperor but what he did, he completely became saadhu. Didn't he thought, if he would become saadhu, who will save the real saadhus. And honestly PM modi has also became timid
Hello, pls stop being a intellectual POWERFUL and TIMID inefficient LOBBY urself, under the mask of Magnanimity that even Modi is showing now to own Indians for VOTEBANK in the name of RELIGIOUS HATRED to win elections. If u observe we all might agree with ASHOKA AND PRITHVIRAJ SYNDROMES of being too magnanimous to enemies because of incomplete understanding of DHARMA AND a VALUE IN UNDERSTANDING HOW TO HONOUR AND PROTECT own CIVILISATION. But if u watch the video oce again, it is the lack of integrity between own BUDDHIST TRADERS and HINDU TRADERS that allowed the MUSLIMS AND LATER THE BRITISH to take over india, and the miscalculation of Buddhist monks probably due to indifferences and looking down upon Buddhists and their traders in protecting a true integrity in CIVILISATIONAL VALUES that arose from Hindu traders towards Buddhist values, till 712 AD or so that led Buddhist sangha and their supporting Trade unions to START INVITING MUSLIM INVADERS into the country. To which their own universities and Buddhist monks themselves fell prey to and were mass slaughtered too. It is infact true Hindu Manu Dharma is mainly MISOGYNIST and ARCHAIC and hence hypocrit due to lack of inner values to follow among our own indians. Which I see Modi and BJP seems to encouraging as a Democratically elected leadership through mere hindu beliefs alone, more than values. This will have consequemces in longterm and its not enough to only try to protect borders ALONE of India, but to try create INNER REFORMS within the value systems of the country, which Iam sure MODI is too old to be able to do whats needed and we need to wait a CRISIS for the needed changes to happen, along with the events that keep happening all along the world too PARALLEL AND SIMULTANEOUSLY, with RUSSIA NATO crisis starting and china threatening India too as a Communist leadership. The CORRUPTION AND WRONG PARENTING methods on the next generation is too high and crisis is what we are getting closer to as a Democracy since the time Gandhis and Nehrus are chosen and Democracy run the English way, and not choosing fighters like Netaji, Bhagat singh, Aazaad and also ofcourse the values they stand for, being not chosen. Good luck to u and ur retired Army officer whoever is totally living in his own private cocoons as chamcha to Indian government that Modi is trying to build for the MILITARY alone at the cost of values in the country, and those whoever not facing the CORRUPTION AND HARASSMENTS and Atrocities of Democracy of the social injustices at all, and will have many comfort zones how Modi is better protecting the Military alone compared to Congress, who failed even that. It cannot be forgotten that DEMOCRACY is a bad way to choose proper leadership since the MASSES AND WEAKER have a chance to elect a weaker leadership based on blind beliefs and Modi shouldnt think he is smarter than SOCRATES and Chanakya to simply do whatever he wants and whenever he wants to do anything . A CRISIS will teach the whole world one day and rhen should teach india too
Need to restore Buddhism of it's lost glory It's one of the magnificent philosophical traditions of dharmic India Need to make it a part of education curriculum along with all other Indic traditions
@@chiranjibisahoo5408 No, Buddha preached non self and non-soul he rejected the permanence of the soul it completely goes against what Upanishads are based on
You r giving really unbiased reasons.otherwise,in these days everywhere it is spread that Hinduism is the only reason for declination of bhuddhism in indian subcontinent.
Bhudhism Jainism declined not by any force but Other reason.Usually when Jain king leaves Jainism all others in his kingdom also left. For example Hoysala king vishnuvardhana.Being a. Jain my opinion is this .Most Jain temples changed into Hindu temple not by any force it was done by the consent of Jain who influenced by the other.Lot of similarities are there in Hindu or Jain or bhudhist faith So no problem All religion belongs to same nation.
@@shivpuran102 Why to Invade Buddhism?Does Buddhism tell anything different from hinduism?Buddha preached Dharma,did'nt he? Please man dont speak false sh*it.Get educated first.Baudh sangitis were organised by Hindu kings like "Harshavardhana".Do a research about Baudh sangitis and Hindu kings that gave patronage to Buddhism. Even today we are giving shelter to "Dalai Lama" the polebearer of Buddhism and numerous Tibetan Buddhists.Because of this reason China attacked us in 1962. I think the Buddhist community is taking the respect of hindus for granted.Its time for hindus to be strict as Islam on such small sects that develop from sanatana dharma. Had it been muslims in India, they would have taught you what is called decline of culture and religion.
@@shivpuran102 what nonsense? Buddhism and Jainism are from Hinduism. They are purified form of Hinduism like Sikhism . See in paxtan where are the non muslims now?
Nicely articulated. Even ambedkars revival efforts couldn't help, the people got converted in Buddhism but it's more politically than spiritually. All we do is hate Hindus and their gods all the time. And some of us are even yelling Jai bheem Jai mim. It's pathetic
@@xtreme7672 Left and congress always kept Dalits away from the mainstream, we never tried to assimilate in the society even after reservation. We were exploited by politicians and Dalit leaders who always misleads the society
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian. BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
Had it not been Shri Shankaracharya we would all be Buddhist's right now. He won every debate in every kingdom against all the scholars and reclaimed Hinduism.
Crafted story.. similar story is found in Buddhist Tradition about Silabhadra who was the principal of Nalanda University..he defeated the shaivs in debates
True. I am a proud Hindu. Mandukya Upanishad proves that Nihilism or Sunyavada of Buddhism is illogical as something (the world) cannot come out of nothing. Our Upanishads are the deepest and most scientific treatises of the ultimate Truth. Sankaracharya had the strength of the Upanishads to support him in his debates with people of other faiths. The sheer logic of what he spoke (echoing the Upanishads) was enough to defeat the other debaters. But Hindus have the greatest reverence for Buddha and his peace loving nature. He preached love and peace. Later Buddhism degenerated (because of its later developments into mahayana, heenayana etc) and started practices which were to some extent contrary to what Buddha preached. Islam was single-handedly responsible for conversion of many Asian and African countries into a religion through sheer aggression and not because of the depth of its philosophy. People mostly converted for economic reasons (avoiding taxes, better trading opportunities etc) or out of fear.
Even though im a Hindu, i still venerate Buddha (as well as bodhisattvas) along with Hindu deities, regardless if Buddha was an avatara of Vishnu or not. I see him as a one of the great enlightenment personality of indian history and see Buddhism as a part of india and it's roots of origins. Hare Krishna 🕊️ Om Mani Padme Hum ☸️
Buddhism and Hinduism are the same. The have the same core philosophies and fundamentals, but different ways of expressing the same thing. In Hinduism, you can worship Shiv, Devi, Vishnu, Krishna, Rama, Hanuman and thousands/millions of other gods. You're still a hindu. Similarly, you can be a buddhist, and revere Buddha, and still, you'd be a Hindu since Hinduism is an amalgamation of thousands of sub-faiths developed over thousands of years. Buddha is said to be an avatar of Vishnu. Hindusim/Buddhism/Sikhism and Jainism are the same.
@@sup1801 Lol why are u comparing Buddhism and hinduism Buddhism doesn't have caste and untouchability like hinduism Buddhism doesn't believe in any supreme god or evil spirits etc
@@jithetic__2272 Buddhism's core faiths are similar to Hinduism. The concept of Karma, re-incarnation. Also, Hinduism as a religion does not promote casteism. That's a social construct in India that is confused with a religious doctrine.
@@dominicj7977 Casteism is an evil social construct just like racism in US, Europe. Once again, this does not come from religion, just like how Christianity does not promote racism.
Ex muslim from Afghanistan. I love buddhism . I try to learn more about it . I live in a western country and , I see buddhism is growing in the west . Specially secular buddhism is growing among educated young people .
Congratulations on being Free Thinker. I hope the same attribute that pushed you away from our Muslim fold, will pull you back. Allah stipulates in his book that salvation on Day of Judgement will not be on being Muslim or Christian or Jew or any other group. It will be based on sincerity of purpose.
@@AB-yp7nc Well,Dr Ambedkar's Buddhism isn't spiritual that's fact, while it focuses on development of a community with different aspects.You say 'communism inside' lol ,Babasaheb himself proved communism will not work in India in his book 'Buddha or Karl Marx'.
The Buddha preached that nothing in this universe remains the same. According to His supreme teachings, everything in the universe is unstable, changeable, and mortal. Namobuddaya.🙏🌹 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸.🌸🌸
Only when none practitioners started to preach about Buddha’s way of teaching. Unless you practice, won’t get the results. Buddha never called his teachings as Buddhism. He called it is Dhamma which should be practiced.
Buddhism is not for 4legs. GOD Buddha knew this 3000 years ago and he left India before passing away. It's almost impossible to teach 0-4legs/ to be a MAN. Just DO 123 in command by 4LEVELS. The ultimate TRUTH is here for MAN. I got HIM then I never ever believe in any RULE/BOX:- god, edu, IT +++ Do not worry about Buddhism, HE do need QTY.
There are still one 10 million Buddhist in India, so it has not been "lost forever" in its homeland. Persecuted, yes, in decline, yes, but still surviving. Hinduism has had many reform movements, one being Buddhism.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism here openly , dalai lama is proud indian. BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
@@lll2282 There are some Hindus in Indonesia, and Thailand. Not sure of Cambodia, though, since Angkor Vat is now converted into a Buddhist shrine. It used to be a Hindu temple dedicated to Vishnu( the preserver)
Pala was a Buddist dynasty . I am a descendant of Pala Dynasty and I am a proud Hindu . Bengali Muslim's ancestors were Buddist and they are targeting Chakma Buddist . Buddist were majority in Bengal during Pala Empire but weak Buddist got converted by radical peaceful community .
@@unknownperse First I am a proud Hindu and I don't believe in Caste . Yes , I am a Bengali Kayastha Hindu . My ancestors were Buddist . After the fall of Sena Dynasty many weak and lazy Buddist got converted to islam and stong and Warriors Buddist got mixed with Hindus .
After Palas came Senas who were very orthodox Hindus and imposed harsh Manusmriti. Bengalis hate casteism intensly and converted. Bulk of Bengalis were not Buddhists nor Hindus.
Hinduism was a minority consisting of 20 % of the population (urban) at most during the fall of kabul it was predominantly Buddhist with traditional folk religion and zoroastrian population (also minority)
I don't know why some historians say that the decline of Buddhism here in India happened because of Hindus I don't know what kind of evidence they have to prove this but one thing I would like to say that still I have a statue of Buddha in my home and I pray to him as I do to my other Hindu gods
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains buddist workship in each other temples in every hindu family u ll see buddha statue so in jain,Buddhist homes of each other. india gave refugee to 1lakh tiebtan refugee the follow buddism here openly , dalai lama is proud indian. but what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country not even single hindu left there??
This is propagated by leftist mostly . Coz they want to counter argument that Islam is a peaceful religion and Muslims ruler brutality was normal thing and Hindus also did the same. So, Hindus aren't good either. Basically to shut the sanatani out.
Being a Jain, belonging to the oldest religion on Earth, there had been many instances where Jains were persecuted, which was not at all good, But looking at present scenario there is no grudge among us, all Hindus treat Jains, Buddhs and Sikhs with respect, something common amongst Hindu, Jains, Buddhs is the concept of Anekantwada: that means path can be different but truth is one, unlike all other abhramic religion.
jainism cannot be the oldest religion because there are many things attached to it which indicates why the first believe cannot be such specific . And we all are the one and the same. Evil people are everywhere and at any time be it past or present or future but the fact that jainism is also here even though in small quantity indicates how our ancestors use to respect each others view.
Where is your evidence that Jainism is the world's oldest religion? Mahavir was its first historical character, and he was a contemporary of the Buddha. Mahavir is only historical thanks to Buddhist sources because most Jain documents are only from 1500 years ago and that is again because according to Jaina tradition they were all burned once. None of the earlier Tirthankaras are historical but if you want to go that route the Buddhists again are in possession of the oldest Indic document mentioning earlier beings that came to teach. The whole concept of puranic avatars is also copied from Buddhism because the early Buddhist Suttas predate all of these and none of these were recorded anywhere in India until almost a millennia after Buddhism talked about it. Good luck
@@AnonymousTraveler-ze2vm Lol, Talking like flying horses, rig vedas mentions Bhagwan Adinath being the first teerthankar, his child named Bharat being the first chakravarti samrath, and the country named after him. Besides we Jains read our texts daily where there is mention of everything, Mahavira being the only historical figure according to the history wrote by Britishers or their ass licker historians, why should that be the only truth you want to believe? Besides Buddhism started with the Gautam Buddha, he first tried to find answers within Hinduism he was not happy, then he met with Jain munis, he couldn't find about the truth he was looking for then he went to the path of salvation himself where he got the keval gyan(the complete truth) after which Buddhism originated, so it came to be known after a single person hence it is not older then 3000 years. But Jainism is older than the time itself, you can't prove that Hinduism is older but you find Shiva and Vishnu idols from Harappa civilization, the same way you find Idols belonging to Bhagwan Adinath from Harappa sites, so Jainism is probably one of the oldest path which was being followed.
Dear Friend, I'm born and raised in a religious Hindu family, and my grandfather has read all Hindu scriptures, and I respect all Jain Monks and Monk Adinath, but I have to tell you a fact, no Rig Vedas, sadly have no mention og Bhagwan/Monk Adinath ji. And its a fact, you would accept, if you ever really read Hindu Vedas.@@arihantjain8347
the main reason for the decline of buddhism was it's competiton with jainism and hinduism along with shri adi shankaracharya, who literally converted back all the buddhists who were once hindus back to hindus just by defeating them in debates...
NO, Shanakarcharya Never Defeated any Buddhist, he may be able convert some people but Buddha Dhamma still flourish after 1000 years from Shankaracharya
Shankracharya was such a great Brahman that he converted back all Buddhists to Hinduism and made them Dalits to clean the gutters. Neighbouring countries accepted Buddhism with open hearts and look where they've (Korea, Japan, China, Taiwan, Thailand etc) reached. Meanwhile, Shankracharya's babies were last seen researching on making Covid vaccines out gobar.
@@KMS_BISMARK Hey vegetarian Marathi Brahmin lende, Communism is a political ideology, not religious. Any country can declare itself atheist irrespective of the religion they follow. Even France is an atheist country, but majority of French are practicing Catholics. Interestingly, you could only mention China out of all the countries I listed. What about the rest of the Buddhist countries? Tu ja, dhaniya-pudina kha aur hari-bhari vegetarian 💩 nikal sandaas mein jaake.
Hinduism survived because of its highly decentralised nature. Every village / family has there own personalised god . while in centralised system of religion there is need of dominating religious leader , in the lack of same whole structure just collapses .
Also because Buddhism doesn't accomodate warfare while Hinduism does. So while Hindus had the Kshatriyas to fight the invading forces, Buddhists couldn't really defend themselves unfortunately.
Hinduism isn't a religion.. it's just a term used for indian forms of worship.. Now talking about every village having a deity...this is not specific to India..even European Villages had deities before Christianity came... Traditional deity worship is found in all over world its not specific to India.. Buddhism was a philosophy..and it was revolutionary philosophy called Middle Way..thats why it became popular all over india and china and japan...
I'm Sanatani and I meditate on Buddha and Narayana 🙏🏻🙏🏻 MAY WE (SANATANI AND BUDDHISTS)get ENLIGHTEND in so large scale that there will be no difference between us AUM 🙏🏻🙏🏻
Obviously Budha is 11th avatara of krishna and budhism is part of sanatan dharma. All that theory which says budhists were attacks by hindu and bhramhins are made by so called woke jay memes.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains buddist workship in each other temples in every hindu family u ll see buddha statue so in jain,Buddhist homes of each other. india gave refugee to 1lakh tiebtan refugee the follow buddism here openly , dalai lama is proud indian. but what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country not even single hindu left there??
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian. BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
How Buddhism destroyed Hinduism after 6 BC for almost 500 years. This happens with time. Few relegions completely vanished. Few survived. Few flourished.
Hinduism came into form around 600 AD only. The earlier Vedic period religious practices may be similar and predecessor to later dharmic religions but not same.
@@cb9461 No. Probably you wereferring to Adi Sankaracharya period where he did categorise Hinduism into 6 sects with one prime god as supreme, and produced so much of literature and extensely toured through out India. But actual sanatana dharmaccame into form during Vedavyasa period iy self , who according to reliable evidences lived during Dwaparayuga, dated atleast 5000 yers ago. Vedas were divided into 4, 18 puranas, and Mahabharat, and Bhagavatapurana were authored by him Brahmasutras were written. , Gita came as part of Mahabharata Kurukshetra war, etc. Even during Ramayana period most of the rituals and practices mentioned were almost similar to the rituals practiced 10 thousand years later. The importance of Trinity in Hinduism, their worship, existed even 15000 thousand years ago. Too many derivations of Vedas, too many theories, too many deviations, including ethism propounded by many further fragmented the sanatana dharma before Buddha entered the scene.
@@cb9461 hindusim is based on vedas but as time went on diffrent sects of hindusim started getting added like bhakthi tradtion and others, in early days there was no concept of god in medival era concept of god arrived but was not given much imopratnce but today it has become got centric. the reason of survival of hindusim is evolution and change. we were also non volient but later when our culture,tradition everything was in danger we had to use voilence
The most imp lesson I take from here - WHENEVER YOU ARE IN TROUBLE WITH EACH OTHER SOLVE IT YOURSELF ,whatever be the reason ,,, INCLUDING /HELPING 3rd person /FOREIGNER IS MOSTLY A BAD IDEA……. Ex - Kashmir issue taken to UN ,, buddhists helping violent Islamist forces …….. I respect SANATAN DHARMA ………Hindus Jains Sikhs Bhuddists we are all same ………….and we are facing same problems now ,, external forces trying to fuel the divide already widened by the britishers …………we need to unite under one umbrella BCOZ AGAIN FORCES TRYING TO DESTROY US are violent and EXPANSIONIST religions(u know what I mean) 🙏🏼🙏🏼❤️❤️🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@@user-xd6ot3rp4j Islam followers will kill each other and the world will be rid of this crackpot ideology. Look at Pakistan and Afghanistan today. That's the best example. Just wait and watch
very well understood. day in and day out sanghi militias are trained in arms with orders from the head quarters to annihilate the minorities, its very clear as to who is perpetuating the violence and who is trying to divide and rule by spreading hatred.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains buddist workship in each other temples in every hindu family u ll see buddha statue so in jain,Buddhist homes of each other. india gave refugee to 1lakh tiebtan refugee the follow buddism here openly , dalai lama is proud indian. but what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country not even single hindu left there??
There was one thing not mentioned here. There are still some Buddhist monasteries that survive in Bangladesh. Bengali Buddhists survive as a small community in pockets of Chittagong and along the Indo- Bangla border.
Buddhism preaches running AWAY from life whereas Hinduism, with its preaching of Reincarnation, asks us to run TOWARDS life! The Buddha sought peace and joy and he said drop all desires and aspirations, then one will be happy But what is life without desires, aspirations? That point the Buddha never got
@@ramaraksha01 Life without desires & aspirations liberate from life cycle. If with desires and aspirations then attached to life cycle and if there is life cycle then the suffering will come. Desires and aspirations make suffering.
@@54living And what exactly do you think will happen if you are "liberated" - you get to go to some magic Retirement Home, sit around doing nothing enjoying a cozy life? So basically one gets rewarded for refusing life? A life that God created? What? Sir, all you are doing is embracing death, that's all No being is letting you just sit and sponge off him like a common leech, prostitute If you find life too difficult, then death - eternal non-existence - is what you are choosing I don't see non-existence being better than life
@@54living It is somewhat like looking at a glass that is half full - the pessimist says the glass is half-empty, the optimist says the glass is half-full You are being the pessimist - all you can see is suffering and someone told you that if you give up desires, you will be free of suffering They are right - because it is those who strive, that fail If you don't try for anything, you will never fail, but you will never amount to anything either If you never attach to someone, love someone, then if they die, you won't feel pain But you will never know love, never receive love either You are rejecting this Gift of Life that God has given you and Hinduism says thru Reincarnation, you can have this Gift over and over It is your choice to reject this Gift and embrace Death! What a sad choice
@@ramaraksha01 you are only cling to things that are temporary. Nothing truly belongs to you. Strive for joy, not happiness. This is why Hinduism idealogy will never win Buddhism. They choose to chase something that is non-existent.
I visited the Kanheri caves last month, and the guard there(a Buddhist himself) told me the horrific story of how Buddhist Monks were beheaded by Malik Kafur's forces, who paid a gold coin to soldiers for the head of each Buddhist monk. Truly, Islam was a curse to our country.
@@ViswaMitrann These days, communist politicians use Jai Bheem Jai Meem politics to unite Buddhists and Muslims against Hindus, same mistake as dealing with Mohd. Bin Kasim against Raja Daahir.
@@quasiosa Why did BJP joined hands with DMK and ADMK? Again, my question was your reference about Tamil Muslims and Buddhist fighting with Hindu Tamils? Is true or yet another myth in making?
@@ViswaMitrann It was Tamil Muslims were used by Sinhala Buddhists colluded in fighting LTTE mainly dawn from Hindu and Christian societies. Muslim communities only aim by hook or crook establish Ummah, Sinhalese Buddhists used them. Now they same Muslims are hated by Buddhists. Religion is used for Political purpose only nothing more or less.
(Not from video content) The final reason for declining Buddhism in India was difference between Hinduism and Buddhism, Hinduism worked on all aspect of field and life. It had all aspects philosophies, science, maths, literature, music, politics and war. So it was at every home in many aspects. But Buddhism was mostly on the meditation, and philosophies and teachings of Buddha (especially in india). So it was mostly in a concentrated form in monestries and other central points. So during Islamic invasion, it was easy for Islamists to uproot the concentrated form of Buddhism, than a decentralised Hinduism.
Also the Buddha preached running AWAY from life, whereas Hinduism preaches running TOWARDS it! Most religions, even in the 21st century, sadly preach running away from life Christianity & Islam have parked Sugar Daddy Gods in the sky, they have nothing better to do than to cater to their followers, live the easy good life sponging off God - a lazy, useless, pointless existence, "life" they call it, for eternity! The Buddha preached that if we get rid of desires and aspirations we will be happy True but what he failed to realize was that without desires or aspirations we would not much of a life! Humanity has gotten this far because we reached for the stars, we dreamed Otherwise we might as well be animals And that is the sad truth that most people - Christians, Muslims and Buddhists will come back as lower life forms - they will get the life they want - an easy lazy life with nothing to do - trees, dogs sit around doing nothing & that is their fate, that they CHOSE!
@@AB-yp7nc Most religions of today preach Running AWAY from life, whereas Hinduism with its preaching of Reincarnation, is asking us to run TOWARDS life! That is the big difference between Hinduism and other religions Christianity & Islam are basic Death Cults - Sugar Daddy Gods with nothing better to do than to cater to billions of lazy people sponging off them for eternity - an idle, lazy, useless and pointless existence, they call it "life", for eternity! Buddhism is not a Death Cult but it too asks us to run away from life - drop all desires and aspirations but then without any desires or aspirations, we would not have much of a life! That is the point that the Buddha never got!
@@ramaraksha01 Buddha preached about middle path,, madhyam marg in all aspects,,he taught not to ignore importance of physical world ,,he recognized impact of physical things,,while searching for spirituality,, So, please stop this panda baaji,, of disrespectful comments against the most respective Buddha
Budhhism may be religion of peace but it is also the tool of inserting Cowardiness in the warrior,which is the reason for the decline and decimation of Budhhism
There was a long war b/w King Harsha and Shashank and Harsha patronised Buddhism yet no historical account of Harsha mentions about Shashanka persecuting the Buddhists. Sole reason for Buddhism decline in India was arrival of islam and even Dr Ambedkar had admitted the same.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism here openly , dalai lama is proud indian. BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
The word PERSECUTION is entirely an alien concept to India that is Bharath. Till the Islamic invaders came in, there were only debates among the people. A defeat in such debates cannot be called as PERSECUTION.
I am from Bangladesh, we know ordinary people of Bengal were mostly Buddhist before Islam, but what you ignore to mention is that most of our Muslim rulers had Hindu lineage and they converted to Islam out of their own volition and when needed they even fought against foreign invasion, Isa Khan fighting against Akbar is an example. Isa Khan was of Hindu lineage. Raja Ganesha is another Hindu ruler who had affinity towards Islam. Raja Ganesha had a soft corner for Islam despite defeating another Muslim ruler, so it was not under duress. Raja Ganesha's son became a Muslim and he was instrumental in converting Bengal to Islam, his birth name was Jadu, but he adopted the name Jalal Uddin Mohammad Shah. Don't mix Islam with invaders, the two are different, as it was also practice of local culture to destroy your enemies temples. Don't paint things in black and white terms, the world is full of grey.
We don't mix invaders with islam it's the muslims who thinks that they are descendants of the invaders they need to understand that they are the one who got forcefully converted by these invaders.
You have given two examples stop generalising and justifying and about temples getting destroyed it's not about local culture all the temple were destroyed by Islamist invaders stop defending them. You yourself not sure about defference between muslim and invaders.
You have a stockholm syndrome.Noting can cure it.If you study the life of Mohammed from critical point, you will see ISIS is doing everything that he did or said,like Killing ,Enslaving,kidnapping for ransom,beheading teenagers You are just afraid to question your own faith and prophet.Islam is never and never will be a religion of peace. Believe me If you say Islam is peaceful you are yourself a Murtad for declining what Hadiths and Quran says about islam itself
we love buddhism n their beautiful chants. pl dont let d past cme inbetween us. may the teachings of the Buddha always live on d indian soil in peace n love.
Buddhism and Jainism are very difficult religions to practice no elbow room at all. General public/ masses in those periods blindly followed the religion followed by the king. Shankaracharya was mainly responsible for bringing most kings and people back into the fold of Hinduism by defeating his opponents by logical debates. This fact is documented in Indian history. Jai Jai Shankaracharya
You obviously don't know anything about neither Buddhism nor Jainism. It's very ignorant of you to suggest Buddhism is difficult to follow. There are so many Asian countries, that are majority Buddhist, they don't find it difficult to follow. Heights of Ignorance you displayed here.
@@bharsha91 actually most people there don't follow real Buddhism. Jainism was strict I mean very strict. South Asian Buddhism before 10th century was different than today. It too was strict.
@@bharsha91 The Buddhists who follow Buddhism there are the same as Muslims who follow Islam and still drink Alcohol 😂😂😂. And, then these corrupt people label the actual muslims as radicals. Obviously Islam isn't just not drinking alcohol, but you get my point. Convenience is more important that religion. Buddhism and Jainism are extremely hard religions to follow. They require immense sacrifice, commitment and dedication. Forget those two the majority of Christians, Muslims and Hindus are basically atheists. They follow a religion in name only because it's convenient. Not to mention such a strict discipline like Buddhism. Jainism is even more so. Just because some fool says he's whatever on a survey doesn't mean he actually is a specific religion. Go out in the street, I'd be surprised if out of 100 so called Hindus you talk to... If even five of them has fully read *any* *single* religious text. Bhagvat Gita or Vedas or Upanishads or anything else. Yet they all call themselves Hindu. You will find that more of them actually follow clowns like 'Sadhguru' than texts left by actual saints and sages. You are probably also one of the fake/corrupt ones weather you realise it or not. Although I don't know your situation, just going off off statistics. They will also assert that they're 100% Hindu. It's just out of convenience and identity. Hindu to them is like being Indian or being Male/Female. Just another label which they identify with. Furthermore you will find even more clowns saying "I follow Shri Ram/Krishna :)". But when you ask what about them do you follow... There's no answer or very surface level answers like 'love' 'peace' and whatnot. 😂 They actually haven't read anything other than maybe some dumb TV serial if you're lucky. Seriously try this out. Although this might be hard to accept and you would want to accept them as Hindu anyways if you're one of the fakes as well. It's really eye opening. I've personally tried this. I'd say, easily 90% + of the world is atheistic or even hedonistic in practise. And if you're Buddhist, try this out with Buddhists as well. The situation is almost the same. Although, Hinduism particularly is in a very bad situation so I'd assume Buddhists in name would have a far higher proportion of actual buddhists.
@@bharsha91 I went off on a bit of a tangent there. To address your main point: so many people follow buddhism because they actually don't. They just say they do. Naturally there's a ton of definition bending as the fakes are easily the majority. But that's upto you to work out the biases. If a person wouldn't be considered Buddhist a thousand years ago, why should he be considered one now? And anyways, even a thousand years ago a good amount of the top class of so called buddhists were more interesting in making money than anything else as this video briefly mentions.
Yes. It is not a religion. Crores of idols and their worship profited by the so called Brahmins, originally, migrated Aryans with their Vedas which say IKKAM IVADITYAM AND NA TASYA PRATIMA ASTHI. meaning that there is only one worthy of worship and it has no image whatsoever.
@@ritviksood2654 Well, Bahuns destroyed HINDU religion through writing Manusmriti, promoting Caste system and enforcing untouchabilty. This is ABSURB. Hundu religion must take distance from these things and promote humanity and equality.
@@NiranjanMalakar if you truly would have known hindu religion you wouldn't wouldn't saying that. Hindu religion tells you to treat everyone with equality. The varna system just divided some professions into various levels, it never said to discriminate. And besides if you something in hinduism bothers you, you are free to criticize it. That's what Gita says. Caste system is terrible and an outcome of human selfishness. Hinduism is probably the biggest religion and just saying caste system destroyed it doesn't do justice.
Hindus survived because they know how to deal with violence .and Buddhism uprooted because of pure non violence. .our ancestors are great we are oldest living civilization on earth
You correct, monks didn't do the politics in India than Hindu. We sri lankan monks always in politics. That is only reason to survive with competitive religion just like Muslim and chistian.
As a prelude to this, two facts should have been told . Particularly to the understanding for those outside Indian Subcontinent. 1. There were Hindus BEFORE Buddhists. 2.Buddha was a Hindu King named Siddartha Gauthama before enlightenment. His followers ( Hindus once again) came to be known as Buddhists. A large population though remained as Hindus. 🙏
hindu is not any religion, there are many sects like shaivaism and vaishnavism along with many different forms of worship, the british got confused and they categorised all such into one single religion, the word hindu came from the river sindhu and indu from french and india from british. the indus people worshipped peeple tree and lingam , can they be called hisdus they did not even know sanskrit. what most think abit hindu is the brahmanical religion and sanskrit brought by Aryan outsiders , Adivasi lived 40,000 years before any brahmnanical religion and they worshipped nature , can they be called hindus? hindu is not any religion it is a british coined term for all similar rituals and forms of worship.
@@elliotalderson2007 Hindu is a term born out of Sindhu, name of a river. The people / civilization around / across the river are Hindus. It is not a religion ONLY if you see through the prism of Judeo Abrahimic faith ! It is Dharma in Indian languages . A righteous way of living, if you may call that in English as it has no accurate synonym for the term Dharma. Suffice it to say that they were people of Sindhu/ Indus civilization who ARE called Hindus. Buddha,Mahaveer , pioneer Sikh Gurus were from this land and were Hindus. Just as Jesus was a Jew and his followers Christian. PS: Although Buddha was born in today's Nepal ( Lumbini) he attained enlightenment in today's India ( Gaya, Bihar ).
@@sridharkrishnan1591 buddha criticised the brahmanical dogmas and meaningless complicated rituals that can only be performed by brahmans, people looking for answers accepted and started following dhamma on their own. they benifited and many became arhants, but over time it got corrupted like all religion and nowdays even buddhit terrorists are ruling over an entire state of myanmar. can they be called buddhists?.
Moral of the story is. Initially it was a fight between 2 brothers but younger choose to support stranger against own brother lead elder to wounds and him self a permanent loss and dead in it's own motherland. It's time to unit again against the islamic cancer and safe our future generation. Jai Maa Bharti🇮🇳🚩
Very comprehensive video, unbiased. Hindus and Buddhists have philosophical differences and debates to attain nirvana/moksha, but it was bad that these escalated to violence.
Ever heard of Shia Sunni or how Catholics and Protestants went to war and much more bloodier than sanatani religions ? That their blood rivalry is still active to this day ?
Not Hindus. We share the same philosophy. We have Buddha in our homes even today let alone the ancient sculptures that still exist today in and around Hindu temples.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian. BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
We Dharmic religions were always largely peaceful with each other and rest of the world. Ideological clashes and differences were part of life, and we did had healthy debates. but we never killed each other just based on that.
There is always a shastrarth between ideological difference . India gave space to every philosophy . Satya ek hai waha tak pauchnr k alag alag raste hai .
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism here openly , dalai lama is proud indian. BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
@@lll2282 Dalai Lama is not an Indian citizen and according to Adi Shankaracharya as well as his critic Madhavacharya & Ramanujacharya, Buddhism is not Vedic religion. It's not part of Hinduism. Yes, it's originated from India but it's not same as Hinduism.
The neobudhist, mulnivasi, periyarvadi and ambedkarvadi bahave like as enemy of hindus (specially brahmin) community. They prefer to choose islam as friend ( jai bhim - jay mim). This attitude is dangerous for india as a nation.
🙏 Lord Buddha itself adopted many Vedic cosmological Devta and devi in his narration also cosmological sound 🕉️ was adapted, this things some will not accept and specially Neo Buddhists 😂 It is acceptable that some common devtas in Hinduism and Buddhism might have come from any of the side. We are not sure about that. But adopting Vedic devi devta in the Buddhism is crystal clear thing. There is no doubt. Who is having doubt in this is indeed a blind.
1. First of all why are u using Abrahamic terminology (Lord). Is your brain still in colonized modus? 2. Second of all, the Buddha (Siddhartha Gautama) was not Īśvara unlike Rāma or Kṛṣṇa WHO WERE Bhagavān.
@@krisc3371 yes I agree, we should not use that terminology. And other thing is that these all are bhagwan for us when we talk about them in their particular form, and limitedness because of body.
I agree with you 100% but most people are using their emotions instead of logic that's why they're not seeing the big picture here Buddhism or Jainism as a religion had no chance of competing against abhramic religion like Islam & Christianity Nature of abhramic religion are very different from dharmic religion
Watching above report tatally; I am now clear Hindus and Buddhists may have some small quarrels ; But Hindus were no way responsible for Buddhists downfall.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian. BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
I appreciate Bodhisattva Travels' idea for this video. Learn from the lessons of the past as to why Buddhism declined in India. And in other countries. Leave the baggage of the past behind. We do not need to rake up blames from the past. Move forward. Buddhism is spreading very well in today's world, at its own pace, and not through propaganda. That is good enough. Adopt a live and let live approach, Bodhisattva Travels.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains buddist workship in each other temples in every hindu family u ll see buddha statue so in jain,Buddhist homes of each other. but what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country not even single hindu left there??
@@lll2282 Thailand and Vietnam have Hindu communities, Vietnam especially have an indigenous Hindu community of Balamon Cham living in South and Central Vietnam .
But Buddhists should be more aggresive. Countries like Japan and South Korea and coming under the influence of Missionaries. Buddhists should spread lord Buddha's ideas more aggressively. I am a Hindu and I would like a world which has more Buddhist countries rather than abrahamic barbarians.
@@sounav4729 as a Vietnamese from South, had been living in Sai Gon for over 20 years before left it , I have never heard of Balamon places in my city lol :))).
One major reason was that Adi Shankaracharya had defeated Buddhist scholars across India in debates, which exposed Buddhism's faults and people gradually shifted back to Hinduism.
Don't blame any Hindu kings. Buddha was an Aethist. After buddhas death viharas were corrupt. Shankaracharya defeated turning debates. That was the end. Over 😂
- Actually, Adi Shankara debated with children. - Real Enlightened Buddhist Masters never came out to debate anyone. - What is there to debate after you have gained eternal salvation ?? - Besides; Sages (Masters of Vedas) who were 1,000 times more intelligent than Adi Shankara came to challenge Gautam Buddha. - After talking with Gautam Buddha; They all accepted Buddha's teachings !! - Besides, majority of the Buddhists have never even heard the name of Adi Shankara. Thus, Adi Shankara was never a threat to Buddha's teachings...
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian. BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
Saying hindusim, Jainism flourished in India and buddism declined would be wrong because population of jains, Buddhist and Hindus who know about their religion is almost same. We Indians are name sake Hindus, most of people don't study their relgions book and less than 3% hindus know about advita vedanta which is core of hindusim. Concepts of hindusim already declined after islamic invasions only cultural practices remained and the concepts in some books.
All these things shown as Buddhist in india are Jain monuments. That’s why everything is still intact. The British simply created a myth of Buddha in india. Buddhist monasteries outside India are like the knights Templar command posts of medieval times. They are the people chasing the Rohingyas out of Myanmar.
@@surajjadhav9801 ब्राह्मणपूत छतरी को इतना गुस्सा क्यों आता है?😂 एस धम्मो संनंतनो लिखा है तिपीटक में तभी तो बोल रहे है मुग़लकालीन लिखें लिंडू अधर्म के ईसाईउपनिषद वेद पुराण अल्ल्होउपनिषद में कही लिखा है " एस धम्मो संनंतनो " 😂 तू लिंडू है तो लिंडू ही रह जा 😂 हमारा एस धम्म संनंतनो ( सनातन ) शब्द क्यों चोरी कर रहा है लिंडू होकर 😂 मुग़लकालीन गीता में लिखा है " पर धर्म भयावह" क्यों की लिंडू अधर्म है 😂 नमो बुद्धाय नमो धम्माय एस धम्मो संनंतनो 🙏🙏🙏
@@surajjadhav9801 हिंदू शब्द ईरानी ब्राह्मणो के लिए है 😂 जो हिंबरू बोलते थे 😂 तुझे कुछ मालूम नहीं है क्यों की तू ब्राह्मणनियोगपूत है जिसे लिंडू कहते है 😂 अकबर लींगपूजक लिंडू 😂 हिंदू = हिन् दुर्जन ईरानी ब्राह्मण ( बराहमन ) बगदादी रहमान 😂 तुम खुदको पारसीरहमानपूत ( ब्राह्मणनियोगपूत) लिंडू कहो क्यों की तुम लिंडू अकबर लींगकी पूजा करते हो 😂
@@ramaraksha01 So, from your understanding Lord Buddha was a coward who ran away from his luxury life, pursuit the ultimate truth and teached thousands of people facing their ignorance, scepticism and ego. Wow, then I also wish I could run away from life like this. I am a full fletched Hindu by the way 🕉️
@@nishobit.1293 Me too - I am Hindu as well. The Buddha was looking for peace & happiness - that is all - not the ultimate Truth & he thought getting rid of desires and aspirations was the way to go He was right but he failed to understand that then there would be no life Think of it - let's suppose your grown son comes to you and says, "I ran across this great guy. I am going to leave home, live a simple life, sleep on the floor, beg for food. Aspire for nothing, care for nothing and of course amount to nothing" Honest answer now - will that make you happy? Will you hug your son and say "Go son! Go!"????
@@nishobit.1293 hmm a monk who has internet and uses a computer, surfing youtube Great, it works for you, but it does not work for everyone. If everyone pursued your path, society would collapse. To live as a monk as the Buddha did, begging, it works when there are families ready to feed them They become dependents - contributing nothing to societal advancement Please keep an open mind - putting others down for having a different view is hardly being a follower of the Buddha
As long as Hinduism is alive, Buddhism will be alive as well. Because the principles are the same, Buddha followed the practise of shiva and so are his disciples. So there isn't a basic difference between Hinduism and Buddhism!! Both teach the way of human life and how you understand it with inner engineering.
Does Hindu support the caste system in India? The Buddha clearly rejected the caste system. We're all humans regardless of how we're born. If the Buddha is alive today he would reject most of your Hindu values.
@@kphamcao You consider Hinduism just as a single thought, when it is an umbrella of different teachings and schools, like Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Advaita, and there is even an atheist school in Hinduism. So caste system was not a part of Hinduism as a whole, it was initially meant as a class system, where the society was classified into their occupation, just like what existed in every kingdom in the world at the time. But later it was concretized based on birth by Manusmriti, but that does not mean caste system was followed for the entire religion of Hinduism overall.
Hinduism is based on Bhakti-Karmayoga. Buddhism in based on Dhyanayoga. Ashoka promoted Buddhism for political reasons like Constantine promoted Christianity. Most of the world relates to Bhaktiyoga. Dhynayoga as a lifestyle is dull. Buddhism disappeared by itself.
Another reason I can give which is held by the Jains. They say that the difference between Buddhism and Jainism is that Jainism developed a strong community of householders along with the institutions for monks. At bad times this householder community came to rescue for their monks and nuns with strong support. Buddhism however never developed any distinct community of laity. The householders remained indistinguishable from the Hindus. Therefore, with the destruction of Buddhist Sanghas and Biharas, Buddhism was wiped out from India.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian. BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
Buddhism is a wisdom based religion not faith based that is why you won't get "Harey Buddha Harey Buddha" in Buddhism. Buddhism was centralized in all these Mahavihara's like Nalanda,Vikramasila, Sompuri, Jagadalla, Ballavi etc. After the destruction of these vihara's many Masters were either killed or fled to Nepal and Tibet and due to lack of realized unbroken enlightened lineage Masters Buddhism gradually degenerated but still it took 400 years to completely lost as major Buddhist Population integrated to general mass of Hinduism. But still there were some traditions remaining , during the British period while taking survey there were a sect called " Mahim" near Andra Pradesh and Orisha they called themselves Buddhist , when asked why till date you called yourself Hindu and now certainly you call yourself Buddhist, then they said if we called ourselves Buddhist then we would have been prosecuted now in your rule we are free.This too shows that Buddhist were prosecuted by Hindu kings.
@@AnaesthesiaIndia It is recorded while Britisher took the records and my root Guru has studied their text too but it was mixed up with Hinduism . They told Britisher that if they hadn't present themselves as Hindu they would had been prosecuted .
Buddhism was declining intellectually infront of Vedanta & after that in jealousy Buddhists brought terror into subcontinent from west & central Asia for which Nalanda University got destroyed which used to hold both texts of Hindus & Buddhists.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian. BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE?
Please click here for the re-uploaded video in better audio quality. :
ruclips.net/video/Vki5cyCc9D0/видео.html
It looks as if this video has been trying to give a clean chit to bramhins and shankaracharya,,very biased ,, hopeless ,, worst of worst
@@buddha2845 I think u guys are hopeless sometimes
Even after looking stats and historical relationship of buddim and Hinduism
Neo buddisht are brainwashed
By jihadhi organisations
Jai meem _bhim is a historical biggest mistake
@@buddha2845 ppppppp
@@shravankamat7490 क्या बकवास ज रे?
@@buddha2845 I don't think he has given anyone clean chit
In Indonesia Hindu and Buddhism become one.. and survive till now in Bali.. they called it ShivaBuddhagama.
thats exactly what hindus wanted to do.
sanatan hindu dharma based on which buddhism was born. because rebirth, dhyan, daya, daan, karuna, dharma, karma, bhikshu way of life, etc are all hindu practices which is used/stolen by Buddhist and created their own religion. its like stealing our things and calling it their own.
it makes absolute sense if they merged both into one. a real enlightened being is the one who unites not the one who divides. gautam buddha created divide he was not fully enlightened. he had a blind spot on dividing people. if you create divide it will create competition and competition has less positive but most negative side.
@@risingredstone5949 And do you want to divide people?
@@Yogis_BitterTruth_NirvanGautum Buddha created that divide due to the strict caste system of India. Also, stealing ideas would mean taking ideas and not giving credit to the people you took it from. Gautum buddha made adjustments to hinduism and they believe that that makes it different enough from hinduism to classify as a different religion. This is THEIR way a thinking. Being someone that believes in sanatan dharma, you should respect that or debate their ideas if you don't think they're right, not try to delegitimize their leader by a simple "not enlightened" statement.
Also: Even most buddhists recognize that Gautum Buddha was born a Hindu
@@ashaypallav4158 no?
Moral: No matter how much you try to preach absolute peace and non-violence, in reality you cannot survive without fighting and blood. And, that was the reason why Hinduism survived. They knew how to fight in the time of need even with a thousand cuts.
अहिंसा परम धर्म है मगर धर्म (सही कर्म) की रक्षा के लिए की गयी हिंसा जायज है
the world is laughing at you...
@@bmr4566 yes but when we did GODHRA ,world cried.
That's why Buddhism survived in Sri Lanka as well. Even though Buddhism preach nonviolence, our ancestors fought dozens of wars to protect Buddhism.
It's true only for India and Central Asia. Srilanka Myanmar Thailand Laos Cambodia and Vietnam survived the onslaught. Net results from macro point of view I think that what sect one followed mattered a lot. The same Turks who were Buddhists in 7th century became muslims and destroyed viharas and temples 2 generations later. We do not know what sociological changes Islam brought about in the Turks.
Thanks to Adi Shankaracharya.... For saving Hinduism
true the same has happened with Hindus by Buddhas.
Proud for being Sanatani
@@rushikborad4802 but budha never said he is against sanatan or veda are fake he never said against m, also he never established new religion his follower gain power through religion
Ya Hinduism a Rapists religion.
Adi sankar was a shaiv and was against vaishnava...and modern Hinduism is mostly vaishnava
As a Buddhist of India i can only say that I hope we have a good future in our country
you do trust me i pray for you
@@sriramkumar9534 As a buddhist i have researched about hindu god Krishna and buddha.Some moral of the advice are same.Their are some similarity between them.
@@niloyhirok7044 yea especially the cosmology its soo similar as well as the cycle of reincarnation and achieving motsha/nirvana just the path is different
But the country will not have a future then
@@sriramkumar9534 thanks bro
Betraying King Dahir of Sindh was the FATAL blunder by Buddhists. He was a very brave king and the last Hindu king of Sindh. He fought bravely ,his wife also fought bravely. Had Buddhist monks not betrayed him ,they would have still been in existance in Sindh and punjab and in other parts of India. But I like Buddhism, though I'm Hindu .
Who betrayed the Buddhist Kings prior brahman dynasty
@@sanjaysingh-kl2om no one
@@siddharthshekhar909 haahaa have some idea about history of sindh
@@sanjaysingh-kl2om seems you are the one who doesn't know the history of Sindh. Read my first comment again.
@@siddharthshekhar909 Must be Hindu kings started it. Why fight over history. Its clear Buddhists and Hindu kings didnt trust each other and invited Arab traders and became prey. And later the colonials. All os for human evolution when one keeps failing the other and THE PARASITES could make use of the rivalry to come to power like the British and Muslims, and still we are fighting in Democracy. Where Values are most endangered in an environment of complete freedom and especially weaker masses in society have chance to elect its leader. Clearly a total democracy is a failing ideology for people to become MOST SELFISH AND VALUE LESS
I am a Bangladeshi Sanatani Hindu. Even then, I like the Mautri teachings of Gautam Buddha. 🙏
Are u bullied by your muslim classmates
@@sigmamaleslogokijalegi6683 sometime
@@revolutionist2468
Are all hindu students get bullied
But Bengal king SASHANKA who cut down MAHA BODHI TREE -
@@seng7gaming but mongol empire occupied mahadev kelash mansarovar
Most of the Hindus supported the expansion of Buddhism and still respect Buddhism. Buddhism was also protected by Hindu kings as Buddhism is against violence. Fall of Indian kings resulted in the downfall of Buddhism. Non compromised form of Buddhism is one of most difficult religion to follow and most peaceful. Hindus never stopped resistance during Invasion that's why it's survived.
Hindus accepted Buddha as reincarnation of one of their gods. I'm Buddhist and I usually visited to Ram temple in 51st. Rangoon, Burma in childhood days. I asked why Buddhist statute is in the temple and the Hindu priest said Buddha was reincarnation of their god. Then I migrated to Europe. About 2 decades later, I visited to Burma and dropped to that Ram temple. Still there Buddha statute with more lights and decorations. I donated money to that Ram temple. I dropped that Ram temple in 2004, 2013, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 (then no more due to Covid pandemic, if all Covid pandemic ease down then I'll visit to that temple again and donate money).
@@54living wow very nice work.
@@54living yeah that's true many of Vaishnav sects of hindus believe that Budhha was 9th avatar of lord vishnu. that's why we treat Buddhism as another sect of hinduism and treat Buddhists like our brothers. We respect them as they chose the path of non violence and peace.
@@54living every rama temple have buddha in meditation
Buddhism is not a religion it's a way of life and it's the most peaceful and not a difficult to follow
*Believe me... Earlier there was nothing like RELIGION called Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism 😂😂... They were all ways of culture, pilgrimage, respect to nature, worship... Buddhism, Hinduism were living in harmony...Hindus only use to practice buddhism & Hinduism together. There was no hard & fast rule. Everyone knows whoever lives together also quarrels sometime but there was never any sentiment against each other. Everything started after abrahamic religions started to invade.*
No buddism is not hinduism yes it is indian religion.... beacause of Adi Shankarachrya we see hinduism in india
Budhism.made Indian weak and Indian forgot their nature of fight Buddhism made them baggers so islam easily invade Indian Hindus kings still fought them
It was just sramanas & Vedics. Simple. ‘Hinduism’ was a foreign label that confused things needlessly.
@@Adityakumarr7 lol forget about rigveda, Upanishads whatapp University
. BUDHA clearly rejected VEDHAS and VARNA system, The WORK should be distributed based on Efficiency, Skills and Interest Not by THE CASTE .
And clearly said do not worship materialistic things , do not worship blindly what you know Not .
Here all Hindus worship materialistic and blindly worships what they not know. The demolition of Buddhism started in nearly BC 300 the only rivalries Buddhism Jainism charwahanas vs vedhic religions.
Generally Hindus are blamed for the disappearance of Budhisum by our secular historians. But this version seems reasonable.
Still....dont believe that Hindu kings massacred Buddhists during their reign
But buddhism came into existence when hinduism already exists, we can also said buddhist bhikshu converts hindus
Do you know Buddhists kings also percicuted hindus
@@loveki5369 - There was no conversion in Buddha dharma, because Buddha was another Sanatana line Rishi. He called Himself as Angirasa in Atanatiya Sutta. People followed Him. Buddhism was made by Vedics by calling it Non-Vedic because the truth of Buddhism is Shunyam as the background of Brahman of Vedas. According to Vedic dictum one who crosses the Brahman reaches Nasti or Void is called Nastika.
@@kulavadhutasatpurananda93 Pls dont try to add old BUDDHIST SCRIPTURE terms in a practical modern world. Nastika in current Material wirld meant ATHEISTS who didnt even believe any Karma and Dharma existing like the western Materialists(which is important in context of war of RUSSIA-UKRAINE AND NATO as a war in the beginning, for reviving back Dharma in order to exist). Pls utter anything only when u know practicality.
For ex, even BUDDHIST MONKS even supported RAJAPAKSA blindly to come to power as president in srilanka which forced Srilanka, to come under BILLIONS OF DOLLARS DEBT forcing a threat of COMMUNIST CHINA rule just like in Tibet or Myanmar now, there. Its hard to make out who is better practically now. Even Dalailama or CCP in the current world. CCP is even supported by its own ppl and even able to challenge western supremacy which the LAZY old fashioned BUDDHISM as has been understood till now has been failing to do the same, looking at even capitalist and western culture influenced countries like Japan or South korea as well,compared to CHALLENGES being posed by countries like NK, CHINA OR RUSSIA towards the COMPLETELY MATERIALIST absolutely Non-Dharmic ATHEISTIC WEST (OR EVEN EUROPE) as a way of ideology and as a way of some Trust also on Dharma (equivalent to BUDDHA DHAMMA used by Buddha himself, with an intent for Human evolution in a ethical way).. So pls be practical, not just use theoretical terms found in Buddhism.
Most ppl dont even know their Hindu roots. Wat they speak and can understand of Buddhism in a communist way as better way of rule, over the way of Democracy or Hindu beliefs, which are either more old fashioned or opportunistic either way.
I'm happy as a hindu my ancestors fought and kept my vedic culture alive and I'll keep it alive 🥰 as long as I can jai mahakal namami buddha
Modern Hinduism is not vedic...its mostly puranic
@@middlewayers doesn't matter .They save us that matters
@@PankajKumar-gh1up vedic religion ended long time ago..do you see any temples of main Vedic deities in india?
@@middlewayers Does Shiva ,Durga, Rudra ,Hari are not vedic.
@@PankajKumar-gh1up they are not main vedic gods..vedas are mostly dedicated to Indra Varuna Agni Surya
Hindu Shaivist scriptures were written in Tamil more than 2000 years ago, but it should acknowledged that Tamil Shaivism had it's roots in Kashmir Shaivism.
It's said that sage Agasthya brought it to TN. Even now Agasthya is revered here in TN
The concepts of Tamil Shaivism spread and were accepted in central and north india. Pandits of Varanasi are aware of this.
We tamilians should be grateful to Chatrapati Shivaji, because he largely stopped further onslaught of the Mughals into south India.
Come with your real identity, rather than a fake tamil identify. You much be a Marathi , depict to be a Tamil.
Are tamilians really following hinduism?.. many earlier hindus seems to accept christianity and islam morw easy these days... as a protest against brahmanas and due to dravida political parties and also due to christian missionaries... have seen brahman christians from tamilnadu
@@deepblue3682 all those Dravidian extremists are secretly Christians
Hinduism is still alive and thriving in Tamil Nadu at least in the northern and eastern Tamil nadu
Bro vijayanagara kingdom stopped islamic expansion into south
No Tamil Shaivism is there in north, it was the north who spread Hinduism in south. Shaivism in Varanasi and kashmir are more than 3000 years old and can be even older if the research be done seriously. But Tamilians have contributed a lot in spreading Hinduism in south east Asia. I read somewhere some Tamilians even tried to sell a theory that lord Ram was actually from Tamil Nadu 😂
I'm born to a Hindu Family of Brahmins. My parents named me - "Siddharth", Because they liked the name and it had relation to Buddha, My mother despite being a Hindu is an Admirer of Buddha ever since her childhood. This is how much we Hindus respect Buddha even today continue the tradition of preserving Buddhism in India, I want to give my Child a Buddhist name too.
I have always felt closer to Atheism and Buddhist Philosophy than my Hindu faith. But unlike a few Nasty people, I won't go around calling out one Faith as Nasty and another Faith as Great. All Religions are Beautiful in their own way, This is what my Great Hindu Civilization teaches us. Buddha never humilated, Mocked or talked less of any Faith. Rather than be Negative, he taught only Positive things in Life.
Nice thinking
Hinduism is older, that's why the names sound similar.
Ambedkar embraced Buddhism for social and political reason not for religious and spiritual reason.
@@jitendrabargaje2039 it true as a Brahmin like me I have super respect for ambedhkar ji
Exactly same for me too. My father changed my name to Siddharth and admired Gautam Buddha. We were never taught or tutored about any distinction between Sanatan Dharma and Buddhism by my parents. Though Nehrus books did try to create a division.
You start from Persia. Then you will understand.
It became easier to attack unarmed people.
Outside the core Persian Zoarashtrian Territory was all Buddist areas where unarmed people lived, From Afghanistan.
Core Zoarashtrian territory fell and within 25 years entire Persian empire fell.
There was no back up.
It was senseless to be extreme peaceful.
Zorasters and Hindus had trade we also shared lot of similar gods
@@lll2282 Persia and Hindustan were two sister countries. Persians mostly stood as a wall.
The Persian concentrated up North and confronted earlier the Greeks and later Romans.
They were sure of no attack from Hindustan.
Yes Agni ( Fire) . There was respect for the Cow as we both had good sustainable agriculture system. Bullocks for ploughing and carting.
Cow for milk, curd ghee.
Urine and dung as manure
Fools
@@kderailed86 🙂🙂
Persian here and you’re totally right.
As a Buddhist from Thailand. It had never occur to me before that Buddhism is an expensive, high-maintenance religion. And that the economic stability in the region would be such a big factor to the survival of the religion. So big that leads the Buddhist benefactors to betrayed the ruling class and destroyed itself in the process.
Yeah, everyone seems to forget that Siddhartha's popularity has a lot to do with his royal celebrity status who's mind blowing choice made him a topic of conversation forever slowly changing his philosophy to a religion.
All static philosophies can only exist in the "season" of their respective countries.
Like you can only talk about sleeping outside in the summer... That idea will get you killed in the cold winter.
This flaw in Buddhism is why the ruling class (who are taught extensive regional history) would try to destroy it.
That's not how to deal with flawed logic though, only education can fix that
@@L3onking his name is SUKETE not Siddhartha
Sidharth is a Sanskrit name made by bhramins 10 avatar of lord Vishnu ! this is how bhramin s turned budh into hindu
and captured all budh statue n temple by hindu
@@shivpuran102 cool, not relevant to the point I was making.
Very true but even according to Lord buddha not everyone would follow damma and for stopping sinner you have to indulge in voilence that's why martial arts was created in India ☺ but half knowledge is worse than no knowledge and also they got corrupted they became greedy and so they paid the prices although it's sad because it's a branch of hinduism n lord buddha is always worshipped in our (hindu) houses as any other god on the day of buddha purnima my mother prepared sweets and offered to Lord don't think buddhism is vanished it still exists in form of hinduism although not as pure as it was but it does exists ☺
@@shivpuran102 u have any proof?? Brother?
Brilliant work. One whole kingdom of Buddhist Maldives were converted to Islam by a Moroccon Muslim and the citizens did not even fight. A very large percentage of Indian Subcontinent Muslims were Buddhists. Also the converts of Afghanistan had more hatred towards Buddhism since they were also former Buddhists. Adding - I'm editing my comment, I was not aware that the monks were beheaded and Monasteries were destroyed, it is verified. The citizens did protest. But the king had political advantage so he persuaded. The convertion was not peaceful.
Not Moroccan but Somali Muslim schoolar
Indonesia and Bengal too. There were many Buddhists in the past and now .......
I think that was Ibn Battuta
Fake Afghan mixed with turks ,tajik arabs
@@khosrowanushirwan7591 lol he was traveller
Persian and Roman collapsed within 100 years of islamic attacks but Hindus survived even after 1000 years of brutal rule of foreign warlords , this is because our Sanatan dharma and the sacrifices by millions of hindus .❤❤
My entire caste was Buddhist for almost six hundred years ! But we came back to Hinduism as the then Buddhist leadership refused to fight the invaders . Today we as a caste are nearly 1.2 crores in population . We remember and cherish our past Buddhist association and still respect Buddha .
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian.
BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
Which caste?
@@AnaesthesiaIndiai guess ezhava
@@amalksuresh286 he said they were Buddhist for 600 yrs, means he is from north east india probably.
Buddhist never refused to fight back the invaders. History is being presented wrong.
When invaders like bhaktiyar khilji came to Bihar and Bengal there was no any Buddhist empire,as it was taken over by Hindu sena Dynasty.
Pala Empire was the last Buddhist Indian Empire which was ended before the foreign invasion.
Which Buddhist leadership please be specific? Don't make stuff up because there was no Buddhist leadership at the time Islam arrived. Brahmanism had already destroyed every Buddhist leadership in western India.
My take is - Before Buddha, Hinduism was widely called “Dharma” for thousands of years!And Buddha wasn’t against Hinduism if he was, he wouldn’t have called his preachings with the same name “dharma”. He only gave different interpretation of dharma in the age old traditions of India. It seems like it only became a different “religion” when it was politicized by Kings like Ashoka later.
yeah i agree
Correctly said
Siddhārtha Gautama is Buddha's real name, he was a prince of a Hindu kingdom, but later became a yogi and achieved awakening, Buddha was a Hindu and that's why much of this teachings coincide with Hinduism. It was people much later that turned his teachings into a different religion.
Yes, very good points. Religion being used by the few to gain power over the many....story of Mankind.
Yes, When Teachings of buddha were preached in SEA region is started to get shape of religion that is Buddhism.
In Nepal the Buddhist flourished and became the part of our identity. Most Hindu temples have statues of Lord Buddha and Many Stupas also have other deities and temples.
Buddhism and Hinduism merged and a new beautiful culture developed and has been flourishing in our country.
Great! When you say "Beautiful culture Developed" what do you mean by that?
@@srzsrz2049there is always a Buddha stupa in a temple in Nepal
Actually India hindus also worship buddha and belive in buddha ...You can buddha statue in hindu household and books of teaching of buddha.....But you know how indian politics works 😂
@@SplendidchivalryNo. Indian Hindus hate Buddhists.
@@Splendidchivalrythat's what i dont like at all as a Bangladeshi Buddhist
I am from Europe.
This video confirmed my impression that buddhism has favoured the development of islam by stupid ingenuity and by complete absence of military appropriate answer to these invaders.
India failed to expel Islam from India like Reconqista in Spain
they trusted Islam saying they are religion of peace
Thats your confirmation bias.
Thank God that we, hindus remained hindus and didn't convert to buddhism before otherwise we would had been wiped out by now. Every non-abrahamic religion should follow the teaching of Lord Krishna and should take arms to fight for adharma. This is the philosophy of life.
Even though I am a Hindu, I still revere lord Buddha alongside the deities of the Hindus.
No need budfha is fake
ruclips.net/video/Cm_xqKLzrng/видео.html…
🙄you neither follow Hindu or Buddhist spirituality
@@dead34311you may be mentally sick person
buddhism is not about believing buddha as deity. but following the teachings of buddha. you can believe in whatever you want. but if you are not practicing the teachings. you are just calling youself buddhist, like you can call yourself spiderman, superman, gandhist, feminist whatever you like to be called.
In the arab invasion the worst thing that happened that is the knowledge that we lost, which was written by hindu and Buddhist monks.
Unfortunately it is nearly impossible to regain that 😞
I also want to add that sikhs did the fantastic work in following spirituality with the power to protect themselves and also protecting hindus in their kingdom.
Doesnt matter there are more muslims in the indian subcontinent
Buddhism is not for 4legs. GOD Buddha knew this 3000 years ago and he left India before passing away. It's almost impossible to teach 0-4legs/ to be a MAN. Just DO 123 in command by 4LEVELS. The ultimate TRUTH is here for MAN. I got HIM then I never ever believe in any RULE/BOX:- god, edu, IT +++ Do not worry about Buddhism, HE do need nor QTY.
What arab invaisons? Muslims in India came from Central Asia
@@GreaterAfghanistanMovement might want to read about Unmayad Caliphates disastrous expeditions into South Asia after the fall of Sassanid Iran in 651.
@@Tenisinspector8341 That was just Sindh which doesn't even constitute more than 5% of India. And Qasim was defeated by a local Hindu Raja which means Islam never took a foothold in the Indian subcontinent at the time.
Islam didn't arrive centuries later with Ghaznavi and Ghori.
"Ahimsa Parama dharma" (Buddhist took this part only)
DHARMA HINSA TATHAIVACHA (Hindus took that also).🙏🙏🙏🙏
That is a jain principle..not a Buddhist principle..
India never became a slave to foreigners till Buddhist Kings were there..
That's why once Muslim ruled whole India .
@@urgenlama7302 But they could not vanish Hindus. Still India is Hindu majority country. And muslim ruled whole India is a myth. Only some parts of India specially Northern India were ruled by them. Whenever fruitful situation we got we Hindus always retaliated, rebelled.
not in indian but 90% asian nation are buddhist atheist country,...buddha said there is no god ...and most of the chinese are lyman buddhist ...chinese govt only hate monk buddhist because they left their family...but its good to be lyman buddhist...in japan our great king boddhidhamasn ideoly zen buddhism was spread.....japan,korean, china ,thailand,indonesia,mongolia,myanmar,laos,combodia,vietnam,srilanka,bhutan,taiwan,tibet .....only india,pakistan,afgansitan buddhism decline because of our peacefull community, hindu king puspanand sungh...and pan asiatic buddhist were currupted ...than other
@@bi-xaalbora3724 Buddhist doesn't believe in Creator Capital "GOD".but according to Buddhist cosmology there 31 realms of existence and there are heavenly realms too but none of them are creator god and they are too subject of death and birth.
Wow! Never knew about budhists' collaboration with the Arab invaders.
This video looks like a creation of chaddi jamat,, sanghi can never speak truth
True Buddhists in Sindh did it
@@raghunandan9290 liar
@@buddha2845 yes they did
Thats true I heard it from a Sadhu of Himalayas too.
I'm from Telangana, I trace my origins back to Animistic Hinduism , and during 2st to 10th century ce , we were into budhism influenced Hinduism , and also had some jain influence, and we were into Traditional Hinduism today , but budhism had a large impact on the Telanganan society , but the interesting thing is budhism dint wiped out the existing Hinduism, but it was integrated into it
Arent the reddys in telengana and andhra christians?
@@deepblue3682 No , 98% of reddy's in Telangana are Conservative Hindus , but in Andhra , coastal reddys were the first people to get converted by Britishers ( there are 6 or 7 generation Reddy Christians ), but still majority of Reddys are hindus , and kannada and North West telanganan reddys are super Conservative
Loka Dharma is a better way to say "animistic hinduism"
..
I think we shud not use the caveat "animistic" for Hinduism
@@apatriot4400 they not only intermarried but they were the same people, often converting from one to another based on what they preferred philosophically. Back then people changed philosophical beliefs very easily. Not as ridgid as they are today.
*_The Ashok Syndrome:_*
*An interesting article by a Retd Army Officer:*
👉 In India, it's never about Ideology.. It is only about Civilisation..
👉 And to put it on record this is why PM Modi faces a massive smear campaign from a powerful Lobby..
👉 But this did not start in 2014.. It started long ago, we have to go back by Centuries to understand this..
👉 India wasn't born in 1947, because unlike many other Countries we got Independence and were not created afresh.. Therefore, what happened *before* 1947 is as important as what happened *after* 1947..
👉 The most underrated event in our History being the *Kalinga War* of 265 BC..
👉 The War changed Ashok, the famous Mauryan Ruler but it also change India for centuries to come..
👉 The Emperor became Pacifist.. Whatever be his own ideology, it is very easy to confuse reluctance to wage War with a senselessly defensive mindset..
👉 For years to come, the Indian Civilisation became utterly defensive..
👉 Succeeding Indian Dynasties and Emperors would avoid expansionism..
👉 But their ability to perceive and pre-empt threats also went down..
👉 Compromise and Forgiveness became the keywords of our Civilisation..
👉 The Ashok Syndrome would soon become the Prithviraj Syndrome..
👉 Indians have been valiant Warriors, but the issue is that of excessive magnanimity.. Prithviraj Chauhan defeated Muhammad Ghori in the 11th century, but let him go.. Later, Ghori defeated Prithviraj and blinded him..
👉 In the course of this thread, you will realise how we would keep getting betrayed just like Prithviraj Chauhan another 10 Centuries later..
👉 Anyway, Prithviraj Chauhan's unnecessary magnanimity allowed Islamic conquest of India..
👉 This, of course, led to Centuries of plunder..
👉 After the Kalinga War, we never achieved a system that would match up to the aggression against Indian Civilisation..
👉 The unnecessarily defensive regime would give way to Islamic conquest, and Islamic conquest would give way to the British Raj..
👉Needless to mention, the Social thinkers and commoners also became timid about their own Civilisation..
👉 Britishers made us believe that we were Misogynist and Archaic..
👉 Some of our most celebrated Social thinkers relentlessly promoted British Education as a Panacea..
👉 As I told you, everything is about Civilisation.. Every successive regime shamed anyone who tried to stand up for civilisational pride..
👉 British era gave way for the Nehruvian Era.. India's Political leadership again ordained that India would adopt strategic restraint..
👉 China entered our Territory.. So, India's first Prime Minister said, "not a blade of grass grows" in those Barren Mountains..
👉 Of course, no one in the intellectual lobby protested.. Nehru was doing what they wanted him to do.. Be magnanimous to the extent of being self- harming..
👉 Nehru was only continuing what started with the Kalinga War.. Then came Indira.. She suffered the Prithviraj Syndrome.. Won the 1971 War, but gave away the exploits in Shimla Agreement..
👉 Pakistan turned another Ghori.. ISI came up with a Doctrine - bleed India through a thousand cuts..
👉 This doesn't end here.. Vajpayee faced the wrath of the Eco-system for many reasons.. The only thing they don't criticise him for is not crossing the LoC during the 1999 Kargil War.. This is again a manifestation of extreme generosity.. Pakistan could cross the LoC but India would not..
👉 The Parliament attack happened, we didn't retaliate.. Operation Prakram never materialised into anything..
👉 Few years later, 26/11 happened.. But India's then PM Manmohan Singh chose, "Strategic restraint.."
👉 No one in a Powerful Lobby criticised him..
👉 As long as you don't go beyond the Lakshman Rekha that has been drawn by Centuries of timidity, no one will rebuke you..
👉 But then came PM Modi on the stage..!
Pakistan attacked in Uri, so the Para SF caused damage to Terror Launchpads across the LoC..
👉 With the Balakot Airstrikes, he still went several steps further..
👉Of course, he is hated..
👉 After several Centuries, India is pre-empting threats..
👉We had stopped pre-empting in 265 BC, how come we could pre-empt now..
👉 Modi-hate is not about ideology, it’s about Civilisation.!!
👉 I wish and I hope that this Modi succeeds in transforming our mindset for the other Modis' to follow the suit, because one Modi will not be sufficient enough to clear the rot accumulated through Centuries..
*(This is a very well articulated post of Siddharth Gautam)*
Interesting......some Food for thought... for Indians.
indeed
BRILLIANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Literally, The great Ashoka huh. He was such strong Emperor but what he did, he completely became saadhu. Didn't he thought, if he would become saadhu, who will save the real saadhus. And honestly PM modi has also became timid
Brilliant analysis
Hello, pls stop being a intellectual POWERFUL and TIMID inefficient LOBBY urself, under the mask of Magnanimity that even Modi is showing now to own Indians for VOTEBANK in the name of RELIGIOUS HATRED to win elections.
If u observe we all might agree with ASHOKA AND PRITHVIRAJ SYNDROMES of being too magnanimous to enemies because of incomplete understanding of DHARMA AND a VALUE IN UNDERSTANDING HOW TO HONOUR AND PROTECT own CIVILISATION. But if u watch the video oce again, it is the lack of integrity between own BUDDHIST TRADERS and HINDU TRADERS that allowed the MUSLIMS AND LATER THE BRITISH to take over india, and the miscalculation of Buddhist monks probably due to indifferences and looking down upon Buddhists and their traders in protecting a true integrity in CIVILISATIONAL VALUES that arose from Hindu traders towards Buddhist values, till 712 AD or so that led Buddhist sangha and their supporting Trade unions to START INVITING MUSLIM INVADERS into the country. To which their own universities and Buddhist monks themselves fell prey to and were mass slaughtered too.
It is infact true Hindu Manu Dharma is mainly MISOGYNIST and ARCHAIC and hence hypocrit due to lack of inner values to follow among our own indians. Which I see Modi and BJP seems to encouraging as a Democratically elected leadership through mere hindu beliefs alone, more than values. This will have consequemces in longterm and its not enough to only try to protect borders ALONE of India, but to try create INNER REFORMS within the value systems of the country, which Iam sure MODI is too old to be able to do whats needed and we need to wait a CRISIS for the needed changes to happen, along with the events that keep happening all along the world too PARALLEL AND SIMULTANEOUSLY, with RUSSIA NATO crisis starting and china threatening India too as a Communist leadership. The CORRUPTION AND WRONG PARENTING methods on the next generation is too high and crisis is what we are getting closer to as a Democracy since the time Gandhis and Nehrus are chosen and Democracy run the English way, and not choosing fighters like Netaji, Bhagat singh, Aazaad and also ofcourse the values they stand for, being not chosen.
Good luck to u and ur retired Army officer whoever is totally living in his own private cocoons as chamcha to Indian government that Modi is trying to build for the MILITARY alone at the cost of values in the country, and those whoever not facing the CORRUPTION AND HARASSMENTS and Atrocities of Democracy of the social injustices at all, and will have many comfort zones how Modi is better protecting the Military alone compared to Congress, who failed even that. It cannot be forgotten that DEMOCRACY is a bad way to choose proper leadership since the MASSES AND WEAKER have a chance to elect a weaker leadership based on blind beliefs and Modi shouldnt think he is smarter than SOCRATES and Chanakya to simply do whatever he wants and whenever he wants to do anything . A CRISIS will teach the whole world one day and rhen should teach india too
Need to restore Buddhism of it's lost glory
It's one of the magnificent philosophical traditions of dharmic India
Need to make it a part of education curriculum along with all other Indic traditions
Buddhist philosophy can be adjusted with any religion, hinduism too
@@lostmonk6085 Everything is there in upanishad
Too late. The only religion that is significantly growing across India and south east Asia, is Islam.
Upanishad is sacred Hindu texts....
Sacred Buddhist texts are the :
Sutra Piṭaka,
Vinaya Piṭaka
Abhidhamma Piṭaka
@@chiranjibisahoo5408 No, Buddha preached non self and non-soul he rejected the permanence of the soul it completely goes against what Upanishads are based on
You r giving really unbiased reasons.otherwise,in these days everywhere it is spread that Hinduism is the only reason for declination of bhuddhism in indian subcontinent.
@@AB-yp7nc thanks god, I haven't that which u consider brain.
Bhudhism Jainism declined not by any force but Other reason.Usually when Jain king leaves Jainism all others in his kingdom also left. For example Hoysala king vishnuvardhana.Being a. Jain my opinion is this .Most Jain temples changed into Hindu temple not by any force it was done by the consent of Jain who influenced by the other.Lot of similarities are there in Hindu or Jain or bhudhist faith So no problem All religion belongs to same nation.
@@AB-yp7nc can u please elobrate
@@amankumar-cw1ic what atleast two balls do you have.😁😁😁
@@AB-yp7nc it's human nature .we look for information which suits our justification.leave them
Highest Percentage of Buddhists :
1.Cambodia - 96.80% 2Thailand - 92.63
3Myanmar - 79.80
4Bhutan - 74.70%
5Sri Lanka - 68.60%
6Laos - 64.00%
7Mongolia - 54.50%
8Japan - 33.20%
9Singapore - 32.30%
10South Korea - 21.90
and in India - 0.7 % hindu invaded Buddhism n janism
@@shivpuran102 Why to Invade Buddhism?Does Buddhism tell anything different from hinduism?Buddha preached Dharma,did'nt he?
Please man dont speak false sh*it.Get educated first.Baudh sangitis were organised by Hindu kings like "Harshavardhana".Do a research about Baudh sangitis and Hindu kings that gave patronage to Buddhism.
Even today we are giving shelter to "Dalai Lama" the polebearer of Buddhism and numerous Tibetan Buddhists.Because of this reason China attacked us in 1962.
I think the Buddhist community is taking the respect of hindus for granted.Its time for hindus to be strict as Islam on such small sects that develop from sanatana dharma.
Had it been muslims in India, they would have taught you what is called decline of culture and religion.
@@shivpuran102 what nonsense? Buddhism and Jainism are from Hinduism. They are purified form of Hinduism like Sikhism . See in paxtan where are the non muslims now?
Most Buddhists are not really practising. Just by hereditary means
Middle east and South Asia is gone
Nicely articulated.
Even ambedkars revival efforts couldn't help, the people got converted in Buddhism but it's more politically than spiritually. All we do is hate Hindus and their gods all the time. And some of us are even yelling Jai bheem Jai mim.
It's pathetic
I don't know why jai bhim people don't read Ambedkar book about Pakistan and partition of India
@@xtreme7672
Left and congress always kept Dalits away from the mainstream, we never tried to assimilate in the society even after reservation. We were exploited by politicians and Dalit leaders who always misleads the society
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian.
BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
@@xtreme7672true
Hope Buddhism will revive in India 🙏 I m hindu but I love Buddha.
bro you dont need to change religion you just need to change you mind become scientific
@@prabhat188 Nihilism is based on science according to you ?
Puraan Geeta ji padho pehle
Had it not been Shri Shankaracharya we would all be Buddhist's right now. He won every debate in every kingdom against all the scholars and reclaimed Hinduism.
Crafted story.. similar story is found in Buddhist Tradition about Silabhadra who was the principal of Nalanda University..he defeated the shaivs in debates
@Demo Gaming we didn't believe in buddisht ideology
But we respect Buddha 🙏🏼only 🕉️
There's a reason why buddhism is called the most scientific following you know .
I don't think we would have been buddists today. Whole of India would have been converted
True. I am a proud Hindu. Mandukya Upanishad proves that Nihilism or Sunyavada of Buddhism is illogical as something (the world) cannot come out of nothing. Our Upanishads are the deepest and most scientific treatises of the ultimate Truth. Sankaracharya had the strength of the Upanishads to support him in his debates with people of other faiths. The sheer logic of what he spoke (echoing the Upanishads) was enough to defeat the other debaters. But Hindus have the greatest reverence for Buddha and his peace loving nature. He preached love and peace. Later Buddhism degenerated (because of its later developments into mahayana, heenayana etc) and started practices which were to some extent contrary to what Buddha preached. Islam was single-handedly responsible for conversion of many Asian and African countries into a religion through sheer aggression and not because of the depth of its philosophy. People mostly converted for economic reasons (avoiding taxes, better trading opportunities etc) or out of fear.
Now Buddhism is flourish in Indonesia
Lol Islam in Indonesia 🇮🇩
Even though im a Hindu, i still venerate Buddha (as well as bodhisattvas) along with Hindu deities, regardless if Buddha was an avatara of Vishnu or not. I see him as a one of the great enlightenment personality of indian history and see Buddhism as a part of india and it's roots of origins.
Hare Krishna 🕊️
Om Mani Padme Hum ☸️
Buddhism and Hinduism are the same. The have the same core philosophies and fundamentals, but different ways of expressing the same thing. In Hinduism, you can worship Shiv, Devi, Vishnu, Krishna, Rama, Hanuman and thousands/millions of other gods. You're still a hindu. Similarly, you can be a buddhist, and revere Buddha, and still, you'd be a Hindu since Hinduism is an amalgamation of thousands of sub-faiths developed over thousands of years. Buddha is said to be an avatar of Vishnu. Hindusim/Buddhism/Sikhism and Jainism are the same.
@@sup1801 Lol why are u comparing Buddhism and hinduism
Buddhism doesn't have caste and untouchability like hinduism
Buddhism doesn't believe in any supreme god or evil spirits etc
@@jithetic__2272 Buddhism's core faiths are similar to Hinduism. The concept of Karma, re-incarnation. Also, Hinduism as a religion does not promote casteism. That's a social construct in India that is confused with a religious doctrine.
@@sup1801 //Hinduism as a religion does not promote casteism. /
So why you guys following it?
@@dominicj7977 Casteism is an evil social construct just like racism in US, Europe. Once again, this does not come from religion, just like how Christianity does not promote racism.
Ex muslim from Afghanistan.
I love buddhism .
I try to learn more about it .
I live in a western country and , I see buddhism is growing in the west .
Specially secular buddhism is growing among educated young people .
Congratulations on being Free Thinker. I hope the same attribute that pushed you away from our Muslim fold, will pull you back. Allah stipulates in his book that salvation on Day of Judgement will not be on being Muslim or Christian or Jew or any other group. It will be based on sincerity of purpose.
" ¨Buddhism is Wrong" is in my channel. Got many videos refuting atheist beliefs.
Feel sad for the destruction of Bamian status
Yes Hindu people should convert buddist say that
Doesn't matter what harms Buddhism have faced but the philosophy and principles of Buddhism can't be destroyed.
-Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar
@@AB-yp7nc Well,Dr Ambedkar's Buddhism isn't spiritual that's fact, while it focuses on development of a community with different aspects.You say 'communism inside' lol ,Babasaheb himself proved communism will not work in India in his book 'Buddha or Karl Marx'.
AMBEDKAR WAS REAL BUDDHIST HE DOES NOT BELIEVE IN CASTE SYSTEM.
AMBEDKAR WAS A GOOD HUMAN. HE PREACHED EQUALITY IN SOCIETY. AMBEDKAR IS REAL HERO OF INDEPENDENT INDIA. HE FOLLOW BUDDHISM BY DEED NOT BY WORDS ONLY
TODAY BUDDHIST HAVE WEAPONS WHILE BUDDHA HAVE HIS CHARACTER IN FILMS. HE NEVER USED A WEAPONS THAT MEANS BUDDHA WAS AGAINST TODAY SO CALLED BHUDDIST.
@@AB-yp7nc kid,don't teach dad what is Buddhism.
Go and read the history of the evolution of sects in Buddhism and then bark.
The Buddha preached that nothing in this universe remains the same.
According to His supreme teachings, everything in the universe is unstable, changeable, and mortal.
Namobuddaya.🙏🌹
🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸.🌸🌸
Namo Buddhay !!
Namo buddhaya......
Geeta also teaches same no difference
Only when none practitioners started to preach about Buddha’s way of teaching.
Unless you practice, won’t get the results.
Buddha never called his teachings as Buddhism. He called it is Dhamma which should be practiced.
Best explanation.
Its dharma ....
@@common-sense99 ... Dharma in Sanskrit
Dhamma in Prakrit and Pali languages
Buddhism is not for 4legs. GOD Buddha knew this 3000 years ago and he left India before passing away. It's almost impossible to teach 0-4legs/ to be a MAN. Just DO 123 in command by 4LEVELS. The ultimate TRUTH is here for MAN. I got HIM then I never ever believe in any RULE/BOX:- god, edu, IT +++ Do not worry about Buddhism, HE do need QTY.
One more thing was its only practiced in Buddhist monestry ..by teaching and preaching ...not home and society
There are still one 10 million Buddhist in India, so it has not been "lost forever" in its homeland. Persecuted, yes, in decline, yes, but still surviving. Hinduism has had many reform movements, one being Buddhism.
actually the 10 million - most of them are dalits who converted on the call of dr. ambedkar - they weren't spiritually inclined , but politically.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism here openly , dalai lama is proud indian.
BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
@@lll2282 There are some Hindus in Indonesia, and Thailand. Not sure of Cambodia, though, since Angkor Vat is now converted into a Buddhist shrine. It used to be a Hindu temple dedicated to Vishnu( the preserver)
@@lll2282we dont want Buddhism to be kept alive as falsehood, making Buddha a part of hinduism or assimilating them.
How exactly are Buddhists being persecuted?
Pala was a Buddist dynasty .
I am a descendant of Pala Dynasty and I am a proud Hindu .
Bengali Muslim's ancestors were Buddist and they are targeting Chakma Buddist .
Buddist were majority in Bengal during Pala Empire but weak Buddist got converted by radical peaceful community .
Keep sharpening your sword , psychologically , ideologically , mentally and literally a real one, who knows when it would be needed,
See you later
Palas were kayasthas
RUclips ka gyan mat chap
@@unknownperse First I am a proud Hindu and I don't believe in Caste .
Yes , I am a Bengali Kayastha Hindu .
My ancestors were Buddist .
After the fall of Sena Dynasty many weak and lazy Buddist got converted to islam and stong and Warriors Buddist got mixed with Hindus .
@@lightman1603 oh got it
Sorry
My bad
After Palas came Senas who were very orthodox Hindus and imposed harsh Manusmriti. Bengalis hate casteism intensly and converted. Bulk of Bengalis were not Buddhists nor Hindus.
Why hinduism declined in Afghanistan , Cambodia Thailand , that's too should be asked...
Islamic invasion is reason
In afghanistan - ghurid invaders
In cambodia - thai invaders
Thai were from yunnan and were never hindu
Hinduism was a minority consisting of 20 % of the population (urban) at most during the fall of kabul it was predominantly Buddhist with traditional folk religion and zoroastrian population (also minority)
I don't know why some historians say that the decline of Buddhism here in India happened because of Hindus I don't know what kind of evidence they have to prove this but one thing I would like to say that still I have a statue of Buddha in my home and I pray to him as I do to my other Hindu gods
Philosophy and ideology matters
Much of their intellectual dishonesty is driven by their Political motivations.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains buddist workship in each other temples in every hindu family u ll see buddha statue so in jain,Buddhist homes of each other. india gave refugee to 1lakh tiebtan refugee the follow buddism here openly , dalai lama is proud indian.
but what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country not even single hindu left there??
This is propagated by leftist mostly . Coz they want to counter argument that Islam is a peaceful religion and Muslims ruler brutality was normal thing and Hindus also did the same. So, Hindus aren't good either. Basically to shut the sanatani out.
Read history how and why buddhism decline
Being a Jain, belonging to the oldest religion on Earth, there had been many instances where Jains were persecuted, which was not at all good, But looking at present scenario there is no grudge among us, all Hindus treat Jains, Buddhs and Sikhs with respect, something common amongst Hindu, Jains, Buddhs is the concept of Anekantwada: that means path can be different but truth is one, unlike all other abhramic religion.
jainism cannot be the oldest religion because there are many things attached to it which indicates why the first believe cannot be such specific . And we all are the one and the same. Evil people are everywhere and at any time be it past or present or future but the fact that jainism is also here even though in small quantity indicates how our ancestors use to respect each others view.
Where is your evidence that Jainism is the world's oldest religion? Mahavir was its first historical character, and he was a contemporary of the Buddha. Mahavir is only historical thanks to Buddhist sources because most Jain documents are only from 1500 years ago and that is again because according to Jaina tradition they were all burned once. None of the earlier Tirthankaras are historical but if you want to go that route the Buddhists again are in possession of the oldest Indic document mentioning earlier beings that came to teach. The whole concept of puranic avatars is also copied from Buddhism because the early Buddhist Suttas predate all of these and none of these were recorded anywhere in India until almost a millennia after Buddhism talked about it. Good luck
@@AnonymousTraveler-ze2vm
Lol, Talking like flying horses, rig vedas mentions Bhagwan Adinath being the first teerthankar, his child named Bharat being the first chakravarti samrath, and the country named after him.
Besides we Jains read our texts daily where there is mention of everything, Mahavira being the only historical figure according to the history wrote by Britishers or their ass licker historians, why should that be the only truth you want to believe?
Besides Buddhism started with the Gautam Buddha, he first tried to find answers within Hinduism he was not happy, then he met with Jain munis, he couldn't find about the truth he was looking for then he went to the path of salvation himself where he got the keval gyan(the complete truth) after which Buddhism originated, so it came to be known after a single person hence it is not older then 3000 years.
But Jainism is older than the time itself, you can't prove that Hinduism is older but you find Shiva and Vishnu idols from Harappa civilization, the same way you find Idols belonging to Bhagwan Adinath from Harappa sites, so Jainism is probably one of the oldest path which was being followed.
Hinduism is not the oldest. Jainism and Buddhism is not the oldest. This is irrelevant debate
Dear Friend, I'm born and raised in a religious Hindu family, and my grandfather has read all Hindu scriptures, and I respect all Jain Monks and Monk Adinath, but I have to tell you a fact, no Rig Vedas, sadly have no mention og Bhagwan/Monk Adinath ji. And its a fact, you would accept, if you ever really read Hindu Vedas.@@arihantjain8347
the main reason for the decline of buddhism was it's competiton with jainism and hinduism along with shri adi shankaracharya, who literally converted back all the buddhists who were once hindus back to hindus just by defeating them in debates...
Yup.. Those debates in which Shankaracharya defeated Buddhist philosophies had most ppl in the sub-continent to convert back to Hinduism.
@@niharika8288 Because, Buddha taught dhyaan yoga and Shankaracharya proved it 🙏🏻🙏🏻 AUM
NO, Shanakarcharya Never Defeated any Buddhist, he may be able convert some people but Buddha Dhamma still flourish after 1000 years from Shankaracharya
Shankracharya was such a great Brahman that he converted back all Buddhists to Hinduism and made them Dalits to clean the gutters. Neighbouring countries accepted Buddhism with open hearts and look where they've (Korea, Japan, China, Taiwan, Thailand etc) reached.
Meanwhile, Shankracharya's babies were last seen researching on making Covid vaccines out gobar.
@@KMS_BISMARK Hey vegetarian Marathi Brahmin lende, Communism is a political ideology, not religious. Any country can declare itself atheist irrespective of the religion they follow. Even France is an atheist country, but majority of French are practicing Catholics.
Interestingly, you could only mention China out of all the countries I listed. What about the rest of the Buddhist countries? Tu ja, dhaniya-pudina kha aur hari-bhari vegetarian 💩 nikal sandaas mein jaake.
Hinduism survived because of its highly decentralised nature. Every village / family has there own personalised god . while in centralised system of religion there is need of dominating religious leader , in the lack of same whole structure just collapses .
Also because Buddhism doesn't accomodate warfare while Hinduism does. So while Hindus had the Kshatriyas to fight the invading forces, Buddhists couldn't really defend themselves unfortunately.
Like they say, Hinduism has many head. Rightly so, they killed one, another one cropped up and rest continued. They couldn't butcher dharma.
Hinduism isn't a religion.. it's just a term used for indian forms of worship..
Now talking about every village having a deity...this is not specific to India..even European Villages had deities before Christianity came...
Traditional deity worship is found in all over world its not specific to India..
Buddhism was a philosophy..and it was revolutionary philosophy called Middle Way..thats why it became popular all over india and china and japan...
Dude in every village there are deities not gods, people like you are the reason why westerns make fun of our religion
I'm Sanatani and I meditate on Buddha and Narayana 🙏🏻🙏🏻 MAY WE (SANATANI AND BUDDHISTS)get ENLIGHTEND in so large scale that there will be no difference between us AUM 🙏🏻🙏🏻
Obviously Budha is 11th avatara of krishna and budhism is part of sanatan dharma. All that theory which says budhists were attacks by hindu and bhramhins are made by so called woke jay memes.
Brahmanism simply create stories to exploit... Just created Budha as Vishnu avtar and he was Brahmin in early janmaas ...N destroyed Budhism....
Tunni
@@sys9208 what is tunni
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains buddist workship in each other temples in every hindu family u ll see buddha statue so in jain,Buddhist homes of each other. india gave refugee to 1lakh tiebtan refugee the follow buddism here openly , dalai lama is proud indian.
but what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country not even single hindu left there??
Adi shankaracharya. 🗿the gigachad
🚩🚩
🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌
Aurangzeb 🗿 babur 🗿 khilji empire 🗿 akbar 🗿
He was a prachanna baudha 😂😂
@@alphaff9939 bhimbhakt
The Buddha will always live in my heart. Statistics to suggest a decline mean NOTHING
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian.
BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
@@lll2282buddhism declined in india due to many factors, did you not watch this video?
How Buddhism destroyed Hinduism after 6 BC for almost 500 years. This happens with time. Few relegions completely vanished. Few survived. Few flourished.
Hinduism came into form around 600 AD only. The earlier Vedic period religious practices may be similar and predecessor to later dharmic religions but not same.
@@cb9461 No. Probably you wereferring to Adi Sankaracharya period where he did categorise Hinduism into 6 sects with one prime god as supreme, and produced so much of literature and extensely toured through out India. But actual sanatana dharmaccame into form during Vedavyasa period iy self , who according to reliable evidences lived during Dwaparayuga, dated atleast 5000 yers ago. Vedas were divided into 4, 18 puranas, and Mahabharat, and Bhagavatapurana were authored by him Brahmasutras were written. , Gita came as part of Mahabharata Kurukshetra war, etc. Even during Ramayana period most of the rituals and practices mentioned were almost similar to the rituals practiced 10 thousand years later. The importance of Trinity in Hinduism, their worship, existed even 15000 thousand years ago. Too many derivations of Vedas, too many theories, too many deviations, including ethism propounded by many further
fragmented the sanatana dharma before Buddha entered the scene.
@@cb9461 Buddhism Is Kaliyuga Religion Founded In Kaliyuga
@@111saibaba Thank God🕉️😊🙏 We Hindus Don't Have Any Founder Of Man Made Religion
@@cb9461 hindusim is based on vedas but as time went on diffrent sects of hindusim started getting added like bhakthi tradtion and others, in early days there was no concept of god in medival era concept of god arrived but was not given much imopratnce but today it has become got centric.
the reason of survival of hindusim is evolution and change. we were also non volient but later when our culture,tradition everything was in danger we had to use voilence
The most imp lesson I take from here - WHENEVER YOU ARE IN TROUBLE WITH EACH OTHER SOLVE IT YOURSELF ,whatever be the reason ,,, INCLUDING /HELPING 3rd person /FOREIGNER IS MOSTLY A BAD IDEA…….
Ex - Kashmir issue taken to UN ,, buddhists helping violent Islamist forces ……..
I respect SANATAN DHARMA ………Hindus Jains Sikhs Bhuddists we are all same ………….and we are facing same problems now ,, external forces trying to fuel the divide already widened by the britishers …………we need to unite under one umbrella BCOZ AGAIN FORCES TRYING TO DESTROY US are violent and EXPANSIONIST religions(u know what I mean)
🙏🏼🙏🏼❤️❤️🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Islam will win for sure and you can't stop it. You know what I mean :P
@@user-xd6ot3rp4j Islam followers will kill each other and the world will be rid of this crackpot ideology. Look at Pakistan and Afghanistan today. That's the best example. Just wait and watch
very well understood. day in and day out sanghi militias are trained in arms with orders from the head quarters to annihilate the minorities, its very clear as to who is perpetuating the violence and who is trying to divide and rule by spreading hatred.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains buddist workship in each other temples in every hindu family u ll see buddha statue so in jain,Buddhist homes of each other. india gave refugee to 1lakh tiebtan refugee the follow buddism here openly , dalai lama is proud indian.
but what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country not even single hindu left there??
There was one thing not mentioned here. There are still some Buddhist monasteries that survive in Bangladesh. Bengali Buddhists survive as a small community in pockets of Chittagong and along the Indo- Bangla border.
Adi Shankracharya also played a role in it. He Debated with buddhists a lot and converted back most buddhists back to Hindus.
I love Buddhism though I'm born in hindu family I feel connected with Buddhism in early age itself
Buddhism preaches running AWAY from life whereas Hinduism, with its preaching of Reincarnation, asks us to run TOWARDS life!
The Buddha sought peace and joy and he said drop all desires and aspirations, then one will be happy
But what is life without desires, aspirations?
That point the Buddha never got
@@ramaraksha01 Life without desires & aspirations liberate from life cycle. If with desires and aspirations then attached to life cycle and if there is life cycle then the suffering will come. Desires and aspirations make suffering.
@@54living And what exactly do you think will happen if you are "liberated" - you get to go to some magic Retirement Home, sit around doing nothing enjoying a cozy life?
So basically one gets rewarded for refusing life? A life that God created? What?
Sir, all you are doing is embracing death, that's all
No being is letting you just sit and sponge off him like a common leech, prostitute
If you find life too difficult, then death - eternal non-existence - is what you are choosing
I don't see non-existence being better than life
@@54living It is somewhat like looking at a glass that is half full - the pessimist says the glass is half-empty, the optimist says the glass is half-full
You are being the pessimist - all you can see is suffering and someone told you that if you give up desires, you will be free of suffering
They are right - because it is those who strive, that fail
If you don't try for anything, you will never fail, but you will never amount to anything either
If you never attach to someone, love someone, then if they die, you won't feel pain
But you will never know love, never receive love either
You are rejecting this Gift of Life that God has given you and Hinduism says thru Reincarnation, you can have this Gift over and over
It is your choice to reject this Gift and embrace Death!
What a sad choice
@@ramaraksha01 you are only cling to things that are temporary. Nothing truly belongs to you. Strive for joy, not happiness. This is why Hinduism idealogy will never win Buddhism. They choose to chase something that is non-existent.
In tamilnadu Buddhism declined due to saivam ,as saivam won it due to strong points which Buddhism and Jainism didnt have
shaivaism attacked vaishanavist as well
@@indiasrailroadSpeak strife is a very important part of life
@@indiasrailroadSpeak both are part of hindusim, yes lot of shivas do hate vishnavates but many support them as well.
Shiva, Vishnu are both same soul
Or is it due to a majority having accepted Theism (Hinduism) over Agnostism (Buddhism)?
@@godsworldorder5565 no it was the debate at sangam where king will be the judge over there
I visited the Kanheri caves last month, and the guard there(a Buddhist himself) told me the horrific story of how Buddhist Monks were beheaded by Malik Kafur's forces, who paid a gold coin to soldiers for the head of each Buddhist monk. Truly, Islam was a curse to our country.
A curse to the world too
Shankaracharya upholded Hinduism by his knowledge and power not by killing budhists
The same Buddhists colluded with Tamil Muslims to fight Hindu Tamils same repeated now also.
What? Please tell more?
@@ViswaMitrann These days, communist politicians use Jai Bheem Jai Meem politics to unite Buddhists and Muslims against Hindus, same mistake as dealing with Mohd. Bin Kasim against Raja Daahir.
@@quasiosa Why did BJP joined hands with DMK and ADMK? Again, my question was your reference about Tamil Muslims and Buddhist fighting with Hindu Tamils? Is true or yet another myth in making?
@@ViswaMitrann Don't know about Tamil specifically much.
@@ViswaMitrann It was Tamil Muslims were used by Sinhala Buddhists colluded in fighting LTTE mainly dawn from Hindu and Christian societies. Muslim communities only aim by hook or crook establish Ummah, Sinhalese Buddhists used them. Now they same Muslims are hated by Buddhists. Religion is used for Political purpose only nothing more or less.
(Not from video content)
The final reason for declining Buddhism in India was difference between Hinduism and Buddhism, Hinduism worked on all aspect of field and life. It had all aspects philosophies, science, maths, literature, music, politics and war. So it was at every home in many aspects. But Buddhism was mostly on the meditation, and philosophies and teachings of Buddha (especially in india). So it was mostly in a concentrated form in monestries and other central points. So during Islamic invasion, it was easy for Islamists to uproot the concentrated form of Buddhism, than a decentralised Hinduism.
You chaddi people don't know abcd of buddhism,,you can only speak lies
Very nice thoughts bro.
Also the Buddha preached running AWAY from life, whereas Hinduism preaches running TOWARDS it!
Most religions, even in the 21st century, sadly preach running away from life
Christianity & Islam have parked Sugar Daddy Gods in the sky, they have nothing better to do than to cater to their followers, live the easy good life sponging off God - a lazy, useless, pointless existence, "life" they call it, for eternity!
The Buddha preached that if we get rid of desires and aspirations we will be happy
True but what he failed to realize was that without desires or aspirations we would not much of a life!
Humanity has gotten this far because we reached for the stars, we dreamed
Otherwise we might as well be animals
And that is the sad truth that most people - Christians, Muslims and Buddhists will come back as lower life forms - they will get the life they want - an easy lazy life with nothing to do - trees, dogs sit around doing nothing & that is their fate, that they CHOSE!
@@AB-yp7nc Most religions of today preach Running AWAY from life, whereas Hinduism with its preaching of Reincarnation, is asking us to run TOWARDS life!
That is the big difference between Hinduism and other religions
Christianity & Islam are basic Death Cults - Sugar Daddy Gods with nothing better to do than to cater to billions of lazy people sponging off them for eternity - an idle, lazy, useless and pointless existence, they call it "life", for eternity!
Buddhism is not a Death Cult but it too asks us to run away from life - drop all desires and aspirations but then without any desires or aspirations, we would not have much of a life!
That is the point that the Buddha never got!
@@ramaraksha01 Buddha preached about middle path,, madhyam marg in all aspects,,he taught not to ignore importance of physical world ,,he recognized impact of physical things,,while searching for spirituality,,
So, please stop this panda baaji,, of disrespectful comments against the most respective Buddha
Budhhism may be religion of peace but it is also the tool of inserting Cowardiness in the warrior,which is the reason for the decline and decimation of Budhhism
There was a long war b/w King Harsha and Shashank and Harsha patronised Buddhism yet no historical account of Harsha mentions about Shashanka persecuting the Buddhists. Sole reason for Buddhism decline in India was arrival of islam and even Dr Ambedkar had admitted the same.
Aese to ashok ki wife thi jo ki srilanka se thi, usne bhi boddhi tree ko kaat dala tha.. Trishyarasita pata nahi aisa hi koi naam tha.
Mandbuddhi...ohh sorry manubuddhi😂
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism here openly , dalai lama is proud indian.
BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
The word PERSECUTION is entirely an alien concept to India that is Bharath. Till the Islamic invaders came in, there were only debates among the people. A defeat in such debates cannot be called as PERSECUTION.
Yes, i agree with your thought
I am from Bangladesh, we know ordinary people of Bengal were mostly Buddhist before Islam, but what you ignore to mention is that most of our Muslim rulers had Hindu lineage and they converted to Islam out of their own volition and when needed they even fought against foreign invasion, Isa Khan fighting against Akbar is an example. Isa Khan was of Hindu lineage. Raja Ganesha is another Hindu ruler who had affinity towards Islam. Raja Ganesha had a soft corner for Islam despite defeating another Muslim ruler, so it was not under duress. Raja Ganesha's son became a Muslim and he was instrumental in converting Bengal to Islam, his birth name was Jadu, but he adopted the name Jalal Uddin Mohammad Shah. Don't mix Islam with invaders, the two are different, as it was also practice of local culture to destroy your enemies temples. Don't paint things in black and white terms, the world is full of grey.
We don't mix invaders with islam it's the muslims who thinks that they are descendants of the invaders they need to understand that they are the one who got forcefully converted by these invaders.
You have given two examples stop generalising and justifying and about temples getting destroyed it's not about local culture all the temple were destroyed by Islamist invaders stop defending them. You yourself not sure about defference between muslim and invaders.
You have a stockholm syndrome.Noting can cure it.If you study the life of Mohammed from critical point, you will see ISIS is doing everything that he did or said,like Killing ,Enslaving,kidnapping for ransom,beheading teenagers You are just afraid to question your own faith and prophet.Islam is never and never will be a religion of peace. Believe me If you say Islam is peaceful you are yourself a Murtad for declining what Hadiths and Quran says about islam itself
we love buddhism n their beautiful chants. pl dont let d past cme inbetween us.
may the teachings of the Buddha always live on d indian soil in peace n love.
❤️🙏🙏🙏
Buddhism and Jainism are very difficult religions to practice no elbow room at all. General public/ masses in those periods blindly followed the religion followed by the king. Shankaracharya was mainly responsible for bringing most kings and people back into the fold of Hinduism by defeating his opponents by logical debates. This fact is documented in Indian history. Jai Jai Shankaracharya
You obviously don't know anything about neither Buddhism nor Jainism. It's very ignorant of you to suggest Buddhism is difficult to follow. There are so many Asian countries, that are majority Buddhist, they don't find it difficult to follow. Heights of Ignorance you displayed here.
@@bharsha91 read his comments again dude
@@bharsha91 actually most people there don't follow real Buddhism. Jainism was strict I mean very strict. South Asian Buddhism before 10th century was different than today. It too was strict.
@@bharsha91 The Buddhists who follow Buddhism there are the same as Muslims who follow Islam and still drink Alcohol 😂😂😂. And, then these corrupt people label the actual muslims as radicals. Obviously Islam isn't just not drinking alcohol, but you get my point. Convenience is more important that religion.
Buddhism and Jainism are extremely hard religions to follow. They require immense sacrifice, commitment and dedication.
Forget those two the majority of Christians, Muslims and Hindus are basically atheists. They follow a religion in name only because it's convenient. Not to mention such a strict discipline like Buddhism. Jainism is even more so.
Just because some fool says he's whatever on a survey doesn't mean he actually is a specific religion. Go out in the street, I'd be surprised if out of 100 so called Hindus you talk to... If even five of them has fully read *any* *single* religious text. Bhagvat Gita or Vedas or Upanishads or anything else. Yet they all call themselves Hindu. You will find that more of them actually follow clowns like 'Sadhguru' than texts left by actual saints and sages.
You are probably also one of the fake/corrupt ones weather you realise it or not. Although I don't know your situation, just going off off statistics.
They will also assert that they're 100% Hindu. It's just out of convenience and identity. Hindu to them is like being Indian or being Male/Female. Just another label which they identify with.
Furthermore you will find even more clowns saying "I follow Shri Ram/Krishna :)". But when you ask what about them do you follow... There's no answer or very surface level answers like 'love' 'peace' and whatnot. 😂 They actually haven't read anything other than maybe some dumb TV serial if you're lucky.
Seriously try this out. Although this might be hard to accept and you would want to accept them as Hindu anyways if you're one of the fakes as well. It's really eye opening. I've personally tried this. I'd say, easily 90% + of the world is atheistic or even hedonistic in practise.
And if you're Buddhist, try this out with Buddhists as well. The situation is almost the same. Although, Hinduism particularly is in a very bad situation so I'd assume Buddhists in name would have a far higher proportion of actual buddhists.
@@bharsha91 I went off on a bit of a tangent there.
To address your main point: so many people follow buddhism because they actually don't. They just say they do. Naturally there's a ton of definition bending as the fakes are easily the majority. But that's upto you to work out the biases. If a person wouldn't be considered Buddhist a thousand years ago, why should he be considered one now? And anyways, even a thousand years ago a good amount of the top class of so called buddhists were more interesting in making money than anything else as this video briefly mentions.
Hinduism is not a religion, it's an evolution of life
Yes. It is not a religion. Crores of idols and their worship profited by the so called Brahmins, originally, migrated Aryans with their Vedas which say IKKAM IVADITYAM AND NA TASYA PRATIMA ASTHI. meaning that there is only one worthy of worship and it has no image whatsoever.
@@shaikkhadarbasha9892 just shutup zakir nalyak fanboy .
@@shaikkhadarbasha9892 So technically u are saying u don't need to accept anyone as last prophet to believe in one God.😂
@@shaikkhadarbasha9892 Half baked knowledge is very dangerous.
Hindus and bhudhist should work&live together 🙏
No a sunna accha lagta ha lekin reality or kuch.
Well Buddhimsm teaches for equality among human being but Hinduism teaches Caste System, untouchability, Manusmriti.
@@NiranjanMalakar lmao not really
@@ritviksood2654 Well, Bahuns destroyed HINDU religion through writing Manusmriti, promoting Caste system and enforcing untouchabilty. This is ABSURB. Hundu religion must take distance from these things and promote humanity and equality.
@@NiranjanMalakar if you truly would have known hindu religion you wouldn't wouldn't saying that. Hindu religion tells you to treat everyone with equality. The varna system just divided some professions into various levels, it never said to discriminate. And besides if you something in hinduism bothers you, you are free to criticize it. That's what Gita says. Caste system is terrible and an outcome of human selfishness. Hinduism is probably the biggest religion and just saying caste system destroyed it doesn't do justice.
Hindus survived because they know how to deal with violence .and Buddhism uprooted because of pure non violence. .our ancestors are great we are oldest living civilization on earth
You correct, monks didn't do the politics in India than Hindu. We sri lankan monks always in politics. That is only reason to survive with competitive religion just like Muslim and chistian.
Am a Hindu and I love Buddhism!
and what makes you hindu ?
The karma will hit back just wait
😂😂😂🤣😂🤣😂 Gaumutra kam pee.
As a prelude to this, two facts should have been told .
Particularly to the understanding for those outside Indian Subcontinent.
1. There were Hindus BEFORE Buddhists.
2.Buddha was a Hindu King named Siddartha Gauthama before enlightenment.
His followers ( Hindus once again) came to be known as Buddhists.
A large population though remained as Hindus.
🙏
hindu is not any religion, there are many sects like shaivaism and vaishnavism along with many different forms of worship, the british got confused and they categorised all such into one single religion, the word hindu came from the river sindhu and indu from french and india from british. the indus people worshipped peeple tree and lingam , can they be called hisdus they did not even know sanskrit. what most think abit hindu is the brahmanical religion and sanskrit brought by Aryan outsiders , Adivasi lived 40,000 years before any brahmnanical religion and they worshipped nature , can they be called hindus? hindu is not any religion it is a british coined term for all similar rituals and forms of worship.
@@elliotalderson2007
Hindu is a term born out of Sindhu, name of a river. The people / civilization around / across the river are Hindus.
It is not a religion ONLY if you see through the prism of Judeo Abrahimic faith !
It is Dharma in Indian languages . A righteous way of living, if you may call that in English as it has no accurate synonym for the term Dharma.
Suffice it to say that they were people of Sindhu/ Indus civilization who ARE called Hindus.
Buddha,Mahaveer , pioneer Sikh Gurus were from this land and were Hindus.
Just as Jesus was a Jew and his followers Christian.
PS: Although Buddha was born in today's Nepal ( Lumbini) he attained enlightenment in today's India ( Gaya, Bihar ).
@@ygcg8696 So, as per Elliot, Hinduism never existed. So the Buddha broke away from a system which never existed. This is rubbish.
@@sridharkrishnan1591 😂👍
@@sridharkrishnan1591 buddha criticised the brahmanical dogmas and meaningless complicated rituals that can only be performed by brahmans, people looking for answers accepted and started following dhamma on their own. they benifited and many became arhants, but over time it got corrupted like all religion and nowdays even buddhit terrorists are ruling over an entire state of myanmar. can they be called buddhists?.
Every religion will be destroyed but The path of Buddha will sustain forever........a great path of science and humanity
true 😊
Moral of the story is. Initially it was a fight between 2 brothers but younger choose to support stranger against own brother lead elder to wounds and him self a permanent loss and dead in it's own motherland. It's time to unit again against the islamic cancer and safe our future generation. Jai Maa Bharti🇮🇳🚩
Very comprehensive video, unbiased.
Hindus and Buddhists have philosophical differences and debates to attain nirvana/moksha, but it was bad that these escalated to violence.
Ever heard of Shia Sunni or how Catholics and Protestants went to war and much more bloodier than sanatani religions ? That their blood rivalry is still active to this day ?
Not Hindus. We share the same philosophy. We have Buddha in our homes even today let alone the ancient sculptures that still exist today in and around Hindu temples.
Yes I am a Brahmin from bihar and I know we have a huge respect for Budha 🙏
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian.
BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
Most Budhists were eliminated
@@kavilphilip by whom and When? Also, why? Was it the same with Jains too? We have Lord Bahubali / Gomateshwara in Shravanabelagola, Karnataka.
Very interesting, I always wondered why Buddhism was almost entirely erased in now Pakistan, India and other countries
Because they can't believe that they are living in illusion .
We Dharmic religions were always largely peaceful with each other and rest of the world. Ideological clashes and differences were part of life, and we did had healthy debates. but we never killed each other just based on that.
Ignorance is bliss.
There is always a shastrarth between ideological difference .
India gave space to every philosophy .
Satya ek hai waha tak pauchnr k alag alag raste hai .
@@qadimonotheisttheasian24 what ignorance??plz point out...
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism here openly , dalai lama is proud indian.
BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
@@lll2282 Dalai Lama is not an Indian citizen and according to Adi Shankaracharya as well as his critic Madhavacharya & Ramanujacharya, Buddhism is not Vedic religion. It's not part of Hinduism.
Yes, it's originated from India but it's not same as Hinduism.
The neobudhist, mulnivasi, periyarvadi and ambedkarvadi bahave like as enemy of hindus (specially brahmin) community. They prefer to choose islam as friend ( jai bhim - jay mim). This attitude is dangerous for india as a nation.
Suppose to be Islam removed, then possible no caste in Hinduism.
🙏 Lord Buddha itself adopted many Vedic cosmological Devta and devi in his narration also cosmological sound 🕉️ was adapted, this things some will not accept and specially Neo Buddhists 😂
It is acceptable that some common devtas in Hinduism and Buddhism might have come from any of the side. We are not sure about that.
But adopting Vedic devi devta in the Buddhism is crystal clear thing. There is no doubt. Who is having doubt in this is indeed a blind.
1. First of all why are u using Abrahamic terminology (Lord). Is your brain still in colonized modus?
2. Second of all, the Buddha (Siddhartha Gautama) was not Īśvara unlike Rāma or Kṛṣṇa WHO WERE Bhagavān.
@@krisc3371 yes I agree, we should not use that terminology.
And other thing is that these all are bhagwan for us when we talk about them in their particular form, and limitedness because of body.
Buddhism is flawed they misinterpreted the silence of buddha in their own ways.
Lol😂😂😂
Gurukulchaap, go and get some knowledge regarding Buddhism.
Buddhism rejected Vedas,soul and your imaginary God.🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@AnaesthesiaIndia 😭😭😭😭😭.
As a hindu , if we were buddhists , we would have been Muslim by now in india. Central asia afghanistan xinjiang are all such examples.
I agree with you 100% but most people are using their emotions instead of logic that's why they're not seeing the big picture here
Buddhism or Jainism as a religion had no chance of competing against abhramic religion like Islam & Christianity
Nature of abhramic religion are very different from dharmic religion
Watching above report tatally; I am now clear Hindus and Buddhists may have some small quarrels ; But Hindus were no way responsible for Buddhists downfall.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian.
BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
I appreciate Bodhisattva Travels' idea for this video.
Learn from the lessons of the past as to why Buddhism declined in India. And in other countries.
Leave the baggage of the past behind. We do not need to rake up blames from the past.
Move forward.
Buddhism is spreading very well in today's world, at its own pace, and not through propaganda.
That is good enough.
Adopt a live and let live approach, Bodhisattva Travels.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains buddist workship in each other temples in every hindu family u ll see buddha statue so in jain,Buddhist homes of each other. but what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country not even single hindu left there??
@@lll2282 Thailand and Vietnam have Hindu communities, Vietnam especially have an indigenous Hindu community of Balamon Cham living in South and Central Vietnam .
@@lll2282 that was brotisher who popp uo again while doing archeolgival finding, buddhism was wipe out
But Buddhists should be more aggresive. Countries like Japan and South Korea and coming under the influence of Missionaries. Buddhists should spread lord Buddha's ideas more aggressively. I am a Hindu and I would like a world which has more Buddhist countries rather than abrahamic barbarians.
@@sounav4729 as a Vietnamese from South, had been living in Sai Gon for over 20 years before left it , I have never heard of Balamon places in my city lol :))).
"The history of India is nothing but a history of mortal conflict between Buddhism and Brahmanism" ..............Dr.BR Ambedkar
That's too simplistic. Ambedkar should have researched more
As a sanatani I pray for dharmic unity in future 🕉 🤝 ☸️ 🤝🤚卐 🤝 ☬
We are eternal with prime goal of nirvana/moksha peace and acceptance 🙏
One major reason was that Adi Shankaracharya had defeated Buddhist scholars across India in debates, which exposed Buddhism's faults and people gradually shifted back to Hinduism.
😂 fake information.
Do not forgot that buddhists also worship hindu gods like brahma and indra as buddhist devas
Don't blame any Hindu kings. Buddha was an Aethist. After buddhas death viharas were corrupt. Shankaracharya defeated turning debates. That was the end. Over 😂
Shakya Muni was certainly not an Atheist but rather an Agnostist!
- Actually, Adi Shankara debated with children.
- Real Enlightened Buddhist Masters never came out to debate anyone.
- What is there to debate after you have gained eternal salvation ??
- Besides; Sages (Masters of Vedas) who were 1,000 times more intelligent than Adi Shankara came to challenge Gautam Buddha.
- After talking with Gautam Buddha; They all accepted Buddha's teachings !!
- Besides, majority of the Buddhists have never even heard the name of Adi Shankara. Thus, Adi Shankara was never a threat to Buddha's teachings...
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian.
BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
@@andromeda9030dear op buddha debated mimamsakas , Sankara was a pure advaitin
My humble naman to our ancestors who tirelessly fought in all adverse situations, Abrahamic attacks and kept hinduism ever young and vibrant 🙏🙏
Saying hindusim, Jainism flourished in India and buddism declined would be wrong because population of jains, Buddhist and Hindus who know about their religion is almost same.
We Indians are name sake Hindus, most of people don't study their relgions book and less than 3% hindus know about advita vedanta which is core of hindusim.
Concepts of hindusim already declined after islamic invasions only cultural practices remained and the concepts in some books.
All these things shown as Buddhist in india are Jain monuments. That’s why everything is still intact. The British simply created a myth of Buddha in india. Buddhist monasteries outside India are like the knights Templar command posts of medieval times. They are the people chasing the Rohingyas out of Myanmar.
Buddhism aane se pehle India mai sanatan he tha 🔥
धम्म ही सत्य है
धम्म ही संनंतनो होता है
एस धम्मो संनंतनो
नमो बुद्धाय
@@rahul_k7958 dhamma dhamma he karta reh
@@surajjadhav9801 ब्राह्मणपूत छतरी को इतना गुस्सा क्यों आता है?😂
एस धम्मो संनंतनो लिखा है तिपीटक में तभी तो बोल रहे है
मुग़लकालीन लिखें लिंडू अधर्म के ईसाईउपनिषद वेद पुराण अल्ल्होउपनिषद में कही लिखा है " एस धम्मो संनंतनो " 😂
तू लिंडू है तो लिंडू ही रह जा 😂 हमारा एस धम्म संनंतनो ( सनातन ) शब्द क्यों चोरी कर रहा है लिंडू होकर 😂
मुग़लकालीन गीता में लिखा है " पर धर्म भयावह" क्यों की लिंडू अधर्म है 😂
नमो बुद्धाय
नमो धम्माय
एस धम्मो संनंतनो
🙏🙏🙏
@@rahul_k7958 tera Buddha v ek hindu tha bhul gaya kya 😂😂
@@surajjadhav9801 हिंदू शब्द ईरानी ब्राह्मणो के लिए है 😂 जो हिंबरू बोलते थे 😂 तुझे कुछ मालूम नहीं है क्यों की तू ब्राह्मणनियोगपूत है जिसे लिंडू कहते है 😂 अकबर लींगपूजक लिंडू 😂
हिंदू = हिन् दुर्जन ईरानी ब्राह्मण ( बराहमन ) बगदादी रहमान 😂
तुम खुदको पारसीरहमानपूत ( ब्राह्मणनियोगपूत) लिंडू कहो क्यों की तुम लिंडू अकबर लींगकी पूजा करते हो 😂
Budhism declined only because of its pacifism... It could not stand up against the cunning cruelty of rabid Islamic forces.
We have Dalai Lama in India now. He will revive Buddhism. Already everyone understands that Hinduism and Buddhism share same principles.
Not at all - totally different religions - Buddhism preaches running AWAY from life, Hinduism preaches running TOWARDS life!
@@ramaraksha01 So, from your understanding Lord Buddha was a coward who ran away from his luxury life, pursuit the ultimate truth and teached thousands of people facing their ignorance, scepticism and ego.
Wow, then I also wish I could run away from life like this.
I am a full fletched Hindu by the way 🕉️
@@nishobit.1293 Me too - I am Hindu as well. The Buddha was looking for peace & happiness - that is all - not the ultimate Truth & he thought getting rid of desires and aspirations was the way to go
He was right but he failed to understand that then there would be no life
Think of it - let's suppose your grown son comes to you and says, "I ran across this great guy. I am going to leave home, live a simple life, sleep on the floor, beg for food. Aspire for nothing, care for nothing and of course amount to nothing"
Honest answer now - will that make you happy? Will you hug your son and say "Go son! Go!"????
@@ramaraksha01 Dude, me myself am on this path. Just because what a sanyasi does is beyond your understanding don't make assumptions about others 😉
@@nishobit.1293 hmm a monk who has internet and uses a computer, surfing youtube
Great, it works for you, but it does not work for everyone. If everyone pursued your path, society would collapse. To live as a monk as the Buddha did, begging, it works when there are families ready to feed them
They become dependents - contributing nothing to societal advancement
Please keep an open mind - putting others down for having a different view is hardly being a follower of the Buddha
As long as Hinduism is alive, Buddhism will be alive as well. Because the principles are the same, Buddha followed the practise of shiva and so are his disciples. So there isn't a basic difference between Hinduism and Buddhism!! Both teach the way of human life and how you understand it with inner engineering.
Does Hindu support the caste system in India? The Buddha clearly rejected the caste system. We're all humans regardless of how we're born. If the Buddha is alive today he would reject most of your Hindu values.
@@kphamcao You consider Hinduism just as a single thought, when it is an umbrella of different teachings and schools, like Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Advaita, and there is even an atheist school in Hinduism. So caste system was not a part of Hinduism as a whole, it was initially meant as a class system, where the society was classified into their occupation, just like what existed in every kingdom in the world at the time. But later it was concretized based on birth by Manusmriti, but that does not mean caste system was followed for the entire religion of Hinduism overall.
@@ArghyadeepPal thanks for the clarification. My refutation still stand. You cannot say Buddhism survive so long as Hinduism survive.
@giga chaddi 🇺🇦 has been since the last 25 hundred years. What's your point?
Hinduism is based on Bhakti-Karmayoga. Buddhism in based on Dhyanayoga. Ashoka promoted Buddhism for political reasons like Constantine promoted Christianity. Most of the world relates to Bhaktiyoga. Dhynayoga as a lifestyle is dull. Buddhism disappeared by itself.
Have u read the nath sampradaya, smarta and kasmiri saivism?
Afghanistan, pakistan,tajikistan,uygharistan, kashmir, tibet, bengal, bihar were buddhists now they are islam.
So what..
Another reason I can give which is held by the Jains. They say that the difference between Buddhism and Jainism is that Jainism developed a strong community of householders along with the institutions for monks. At bad times this householder community came to rescue for their monks and nuns with strong support. Buddhism however never developed any distinct community of laity. The householders remained indistinguishable from the Hindus. Therefore, with the destruction of Buddhist Sanghas and Biharas, Buddhism was wiped out from India.
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian.
BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE??
Buddhism is a wisdom based religion not faith based that is why you won't get "Harey Buddha Harey Buddha" in Buddhism. Buddhism was centralized in all these Mahavihara's like Nalanda,Vikramasila, Sompuri, Jagadalla, Ballavi etc. After the destruction of these vihara's many Masters were either killed or fled to Nepal and Tibet and due to lack of realized unbroken enlightened lineage Masters Buddhism gradually degenerated but still it took 400 years to completely lost as major Buddhist Population integrated to general mass of Hinduism. But still there were some traditions remaining , during the British period while taking survey there were a sect called " Mahim" near Andra Pradesh and Orisha they called themselves Buddhist , when asked why till date you called yourself Hindu and now certainly you call yourself Buddhist, then they said if we called ourselves Buddhist then we would have been prosecuted now in your rule we are free.This too shows that Buddhist were prosecuted by Hindu kings.
@@urgenlama7302 mahim sect? There is not a sect by such name.
@@AnaesthesiaIndia It is recorded while Britisher took the records and my root Guru has studied their text too but it was mixed up with Hinduism . They told Britisher that if they hadn't present themselves as Hindu they would had been prosecuted .
@@urgenlama7302 provide a link,so I can read about it from internet.
Buddhism was declining intellectually infront of Vedanta & after that in jealousy Buddhists brought terror into subcontinent from west & central Asia for which Nalanda University got destroyed which used to hold both texts of Hindus & Buddhists.
How do you know Buddhists brought west and central Asians in India?
@@gulfstream0079
Do some deep study who brought Bin Qasim to subcontinent from Iraq.
@@surojeetvedantic6047 he himself came to India to spread Islam. Who said that Buddhists brought him?
people talk about decline of buddism in india, although india is still secular country , we indians still kept Buddhist temples alive, all hindus,jains Buddhist workship in each other temples. india gave refugee to 1lakh Tibetan refugee the follow buddism openly , dalai lama is proud indian.
BUT what about thai,combodia etc.,? they are pure Buddhist country ARE THEY ANY HINDU LEFT THERE?
Charvaka
Jaina
Baudh
Vishesika
Sankhya
Naya
Meminsa
Yoga
Vedanta
Are the Philosophies of Santana Dharma🕉🚩🇮🇳
Charvaka
Sanatan Dharm is TheBase And Maulik Dharm of Bharat
Not Buddhism.
Joy Adishankaracharya ji.