The Helicopter You Could Hear Seven or Eight Miles Away

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024
  • Thirty years before achieving the pinnacle of helicopter technology with the design of the legendary AH-64 Apache, the Hughes Aircraft Company ventured into the emerging rotor aircraft industry for the first time by attempting to develop a colossal helicopter like the world had never seen before.
    As the Hughes XH-17 prototype prepared for its maiden flight on October 23, 1952, pilot Gale Moore was visibly anxious. He was about to test the aircraft with the most oversized rotor in the world, with a diameter of 130 feet.
    The pilot knew that despite the engineering efforts, the massive hollow rotor blades were under tremendous strain, and they could snap at any moment during takeoff.
    Media crews from around the country gathered to witness the event, and even Howard Hughes was first in line.
    Suddenly the jet engines ignited ferociously and flames shot from the ends of the rotor blades, with the Los Angeles Times later reporting: (QUOTE) “The whoosh-whoosh of the whirring blades sounded like hundreds of artillery shells in flight. You could hear it seven or eight miles away.”
    What happened next would be forever recorded in the history of aviation…
    ---
    Join Dark Skies as we explore the world of aviation with cinematic short documentaries featuring the biggest and fastest airplanes ever built, top-secret military projects, and classified missions with hidden untold true stories. Including US, German, and Soviet warplanes, along with aircraft developments that took place during World War I, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the Gulf War, and special operations mission in between.
    As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Skies sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect and soundtracks for emotional impact. We do our best to keep it as visually accurate as possible.
    All content on Dark Skies is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don't hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas.

Комментарии • 536

  • @zoperxplex
    @zoperxplex Год назад +463

    The XH-17 used what was called a "Cold Cycle" system where the turbines are used to channel compressed air through hollow rotor blades and before exiting via narrow tubes at the blade's trailing edge are ignited providing the energy to make the rotors spin. Some time afterwards Hughes Helicopter developed the XV-9A for the Army. This utilized a "Hot Cycle" rotary system where instead of using compressed air from the engine's compressor the thrust from the engine's hot exhaust is the propulsive force used to make hollow rotors spin by means of vanes located at the very end of the blade tips.

    • @deca0
      @deca0 Год назад +25

      That’s fascinating

    • @imjusttrollingyou4014
      @imjusttrollingyou4014 Год назад +10

      Thank you for sharing this info, astounding is all I can say.

    • @pseudotasuki
      @pseudotasuki Год назад +10

      Though on second thought, pumping fuel using inertia means it would be difficult to manage rotor speed. There's a high positive feedback cycle between fuel pressure and rotor velocity, so increasing thrust would require the throttles to be opened, then closed (possibly even below the previous position).

    • @Perry_dAccard
      @Perry_dAccard Год назад +11

      There was one tip jet helicopter that made it into production and also carry more than one person, the French Sud-Ouest SO 1221 Djinn. It used a cold cycle and held an altitude record for some time.

    • @maddmavic
      @maddmavic Год назад +2

      @@pseudotasuki is thisnwhy he saidnits liek a pogo stick ?

  • @mpetersen6
    @mpetersen6 Год назад +125

    Say what you want about Howard. He never dreamed small.
    The loudest aircraft I've ever heard was a Harrier. From about 5 miles it sounded like it was about two blocks away.

    • @flyoverstateresident2890
      @flyoverstateresident2890 Год назад

      Even as loud as it is, it could sneak up on the hapless Russians occupying the Ukraine.

    • @JosephDawson1986
      @JosephDawson1986 Год назад +7

      I grew up in Bangor, ME and we had an air refueling wing at the base there. Growing up it was KC135s and they made so much noise that businesses near the airport started a jet noise is the sound of Freedom campaign

    • @mpetersen6
      @mpetersen6 Год назад +4

      @@flyoverstateresident2890
      In normal flight I doubt it is any louder than most other aircraft. But hovering 😬

    • @hairydonuts6024
      @hairydonuts6024 Год назад +5

      @@JosephDawson1986 The loudest aeroplane ever built was the Republic XF-84H Thunderscreech, fitted with a supersonic propellor. They could be heard 25 miles away & their prop's shock-wave was so powerful it was capable of knocking a man to the ground. Needless to say, they didn't work, too well.

    • @flyoverstateresident2890
      @flyoverstateresident2890 Год назад +1

      @@mpetersen6 Would love to see and hear it.

  • @ernestweaver9720
    @ernestweaver9720 Год назад +129

    My Dad told me about this flight. He and his buddies laughed and said would never get off the ground and if it did the pilot would never be able to land it. The rest is history and still moving forward.

    • @nelsonbrum8496
      @nelsonbrum8496 Год назад +5

      Makes you wonder what else he was wrong about...

    • @JosephDawson1986
      @JosephDawson1986 Год назад +6

      Well with a operational distance of 40 miles it may as well have not flown. Its more fuel efficient to drive at that point.

    • @j.griffin
      @j.griffin Год назад +3

      @@JosephDawson1986

      Generally speaking,
      helicopters are not exactly known for fuel efficiency and the military isn’t really known to care.
      The only time they care is if it interferes with mission capability.

    • @JosephDawson1986
      @JosephDawson1986 Год назад +2

      @@j.griffin even the US military considers a heavy lift helo with a range of 40 miles as useless

    • @christianterrill3503
      @christianterrill3503 Год назад

      Your dad was stupid for not have faith in daddy hues

  • @Flumphinator
    @Flumphinator Год назад +234

    Here I am flying my $40 quadcopter in my living room, 70 odd years later. Absolutely crazy.

    • @phil4986
      @phil4986 Год назад +4

      Brilliant point.

    • @deebo3864
      @deebo3864 Год назад +3

      here i am flying my $800 dji drone lol

    • @darel2911
      @darel2911 Год назад +3

      @@deebo3864 🤔

    • @Flumphinator
      @Flumphinator Год назад

      @@deebo3864 the mobula 6 is an absolute riot indoors. Give it a shot!

    • @8literbeater
      @8literbeater Год назад

      Kinda sad how it's gone backward.

  • @kevinferrin5695
    @kevinferrin5695 Год назад +27

    I have an old helicopter book that mentions this machine and has a distant photo of it. It doesn't give much detail. It certainly doesn't mention Howard Hughes' involvement. This was refreshing. Thank you.

  • @neilsheppard6673
    @neilsheppard6673 Год назад +41

    I'm loving this series about obscure, little known aircraft. Thanks Dark Skies!

  • @MarshallLoveday
    @MarshallLoveday Год назад +249

    This monster helicopter was parked at the Hughes Aircraft facility near Marina Del Rey, CA. for years, while I was a kid - would pass by it often on Lincoln Bl. Don't recall ever seeing it with the rotors going around, and I don't think it was ever deemed safe enough to fly over all the residential and commercial properties that surrounded it.

    • @777cmm777
      @777cmm777 Год назад +12

      I have the same recollection.
      Back then I was a kid that was crazy about helicopters. My favorite TV show was "Whirlybirds."

    • @SanderAnderon
      @SanderAnderon Год назад +15

      same here, grew up in the '60s a couple blocks from those cliffs in Westchester overlooking Lincoln and Hughes, MDR, Jefferson etc. Dirt clod fights, running all those errant RC gliders back up the hill to the adults for a dime each. Tall tales about this "top secret" copter somewhere near but never got close enough to see it, ha

    • @marlobreding7402
      @marlobreding7402 Год назад +6

      Me too, Culver City boy. I witnessed a demonstration between a F4 Phantom Fighter and a Cobra Attack Helo. They had bleachers and bunting. It was a speed demonstration and the Cobra kept up with the Douglas F4 Phantom.

    • @Datsun510zen
      @Datsun510zen Год назад +5

      I grew up in Point Loma, San Diego during the 60's and 70s. My dad was a resistance welder in the space industry at Lockheed Martin, so I was obsessed with all things aviation. Needless to say I've seen more crazy Airforce airshows at Brown Field and Naval Fleet Week exhibitions on the Bay than I can remember. Good times.
      I just had to add that the F4 Phantom's top speed is 1,473 and the H-1 Cobra's top speed is 141mph so it's kind of an unfair fight. But with full flaps and an 18.3% angel of attack, the F4's carrier approach speed just happens to be 141mph. Hooyah!😮👍

    • @marlobreding7402
      @marlobreding7402 Год назад +3

      @@Datsun510zen here's what I witnessed I parked over there kind of near the Lopez Ranch somewhere there. I saw the bunting on the bleachers and of crowds out there the Cobra was hovering above the deck the Phantom was setting still then all of a sudden they both took off it was neck and neck for about a mile or two until the Phantom just blew right past it but point is the helicopter kept up with a jet on takeoff for a while it was pretty impressive. I'm going to go look and see if there's any video of that.
      Could not find anything.

  • @dansmith5524
    @dansmith5524 Год назад +80

    Back in the early 90's I had a VHS tape on the history of helicopters, it was really fascinating and showed many unusual and little known early choppers. One of the very unusual helicopters it showed was one, also from Hughes, that had a single, very large, rotor blade. And as unbelievable as it sounds, there was a video of it actually flying. I still remember the narrator saying that the huge blade turned at a lazy 60 rpm. I long ago lost the tape and I've searched several times on the internet for information about a helicopter with a single blade but never found anything. Perhaps your research skills are better than mine, that might make for an interesting video.

    • @dennisriblett4622
      @dennisriblett4622 Год назад +3

      Gotta look now !!

    • @JCAtkeson3
      @JCAtkeson3 Год назад +6

      Single blade with a counterweight on the other side?

    • @112chapters3
      @112chapters3 Год назад

      @@JCAtkeson3 …shaped in the form of a blade? Maybe it was a sycamore falling from a tree… kids… imagination and whatnots.

    • @rad44rr
      @rad44rr Год назад +3

      @@112chapters3 gatekeep all you want, he's not the only person who's seen this

    • @thurin84
      @thurin84 Год назад +2

      @@112chapters3 google is a thing; Bo.102 and Bo.103. though these are not the helicopter in question as it was much larger. i also recall seeing it.

  • @bruceaux174
    @bruceaux174 Год назад +35

    The concept looks like the predecessor to the Sikorsky CH-54 Sky Crane.

    • @jarvislarson6864
      @jarvislarson6864 Год назад +1

      I immediately thought of that heli when i saw this video and wondered the same

    • @surlyogre1476
      @surlyogre1476 Год назад +1

      CH-54 and Hiller Tip-jet helicopter both came to my mind.

  • @tacet3045
    @tacet3045 Год назад +23

    Similar to the Fairey Rotodyne which also utilised tip jets for the main rotor. It never made it past the prototype phase because for a city centre to city centre transport is was sodding loud.

    • @andreww2098
      @andreww2098 Год назад +4

      they had a new design of tip jets that would reduce the noise a lot, from 113 db to 96 db, at 600 ft,but Fairey merged with Westland and the government stopped paying for the developement due to cost overruns and the dire economic status of the UK as well as a lack of orders

  • @rafael2499
    @rafael2499 Год назад +62

    This guy deserves 6 million subscribers. At the beginning I thought he spoke too fast even for me being native English speaker, but I can’t get enough of his awesome quality videos now. Keep up the amazing work sir 👍🏼

    • @ADAPTATION7
      @ADAPTATION7 Год назад +4

      Most people thought his ass was on fire when he spoke.

    • @Andrew_Fernie
      @Andrew_Fernie Год назад +5

      He has slowed down a bit recently. I watched the earlier videos at 0.75x speed !

    • @Make-Asylums-Great-Again
      @Make-Asylums-Great-Again Год назад +2

      He deserves 6.2 million subscribers and not 1 more.

    • @HubertofLiege
      @HubertofLiege Год назад +2

      He’s a voice actor hired by a business made up of researchers and historians

    • @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
      @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu Год назад +2

      He speaks like a person who is talking to a room full of smart people, but really that room is full of a cross section of the typical public and publicly educated...

  • @dremwolf5419
    @dremwolf5419 Год назад +15

    Darn shame there is no actual audio of the Hughes XH-17 in this video.

  • @crimony3054
    @crimony3054 Год назад +2

    Yet another accomplishment of Howard Hughes!

  • @ur_quainmaster7901
    @ur_quainmaster7901 Год назад +103

    Love the weird and relatively obscure stuff. I've had books on aircraft since I was a kid, and finding a story I don't know is rare... thanks for bringing this one to me.
    Also, many people have heard the story of the special C-130 fitted with rockets built to rescue hostages... but there was a short take off version that predates it by some time that used bleed air/blown flaps. There is very little info out there and if someone could tell that story, that would be awesome.

    • @mpetersen6
      @mpetersen6 Год назад +6

      There were a few aircraft experimentally fitted air bleed systems to improve performance in the 50s or 60s. They had a really hard time keeping all of the air channels and ducts clean.

    • @sssbob
      @sssbob Год назад +2

      You might be thinking of the YC-14 and/or YC-15

    • @AreUmygrandson
      @AreUmygrandson Год назад +3

      I’m almost certain there is an episode on that on of his other channels. You are talking about the plane meant to land and take off from a football field to evacuate civilians?

    • @ur_quainmaster7901
      @ur_quainmaster7901 Год назад +2

      @@AreUmygrandson No... that's the one everyone has seen. This was developed many years prior and worked off of bleed air/blown flaps.
      C-130B BLC I think.

    • @henrys.6864
      @henrys.6864 Год назад +4

      There's videos on that C-130. It was to be used to get the hostages out of Iran but that aircraft was destroyed in a test.

  • @Rockstago
    @Rockstago Год назад +29

    It's always a risk when you place too many new concepts/ technologies into a single new project. Progress can only "successfully" be made 1 step at a time. But (I think) we all have to admire Howard Hughes for all of the leaps forward he both tried & accomplished as his companies pushed the envelope toward state of the art aviation.

    • @teddy.d174
      @teddy.d174 Год назад +2

      He was a brilliant maverick.

    • @teddy.d174
      @teddy.d174 Год назад +1

      We have some examples of that risk, rearing it’s ugly head in the form of…
      F-35, LCS, Zumwalt to name a few and the list of canceled projects that racked up huge bill$, is even more horrifying.

    • @kendenning6517
      @kendenning6517 Год назад +3

      Rock, usually these technologies are proven in proof of concept platforms. 1 off aircraft. Then incorporated together in the original design prototypes. The F22 is an example. Both the YF22 & it's competitor the YF 23 used the same proven concepts: ie stealth coatings, material shapes, vectoring systems, engines & such. 1 plane's goal was stealth, payload & range, sacrificing maneuverability. Using stealth as it's main defense. Larger & sluggish. The other stealth & fighting capabilities @ expense of the other 3. Smaller & nimble. Both manufactures had the same access to these technologies. The F22 won because it was a better fighter jet with stealth capability. Lose your stealth cover & now your dog fighting. Hughes aim was 2 use as many proven concepts (rudimentary at the time & not 2days standards) as possible & go big with it. Think of Howard Hughe's Spruce Goose. Remember all the off the shelf parts used? NASA did the same in the 60s to prove fly by wire, later on also proved it could fly a jet with reversed swept wings. Both used off the shelf parts combined with new technology. Now fighters world over & airliners use it.

  • @indridcold8433
    @indridcold8433 Год назад

    I love the vintage style diction of the videos produced in this channel.

  • @toothlessseer3153
    @toothlessseer3153 Год назад +10

    What an amazing video!
    _(Despite my reading a couple of books on the life of Howard Hughes, this event seems to have missed my eye... Shows how great a guy he was)_

    • @ChemEDan
      @ChemEDan Год назад +1

      Recommendation for best book?

    • @jtocwru
      @jtocwru Год назад +1

      He had some issues, for sure. Lionize him if you must.

    • @toothlessseer3153
      @toothlessseer3153 Год назад +2

      @@ChemEDan Howard: The Amazing Mr. Hughes Mass Market Paperback - March 1, 1972
      by Noah Dietrich (Author)

    • @ChemEDan
      @ChemEDan Год назад

      @@toothlessseer3153 Thanks I put it on my list :)

  • @sammygirlie345
    @sammygirlie345 Год назад +12

    Some say the pilot is still putting his helmet on to this day

  • @JCAUDITS
    @JCAUDITS Год назад +1

    What a gift - clever engineers, brave pilots, and visonary businesspeople. Thanks for making this excellent video

  • @davehughesfarm7983
    @davehughesfarm7983 Год назад +2

    Howard Hughes was a legend...I like him just the way he was....

  • @mojeimja
    @mojeimja Год назад +1

    I am a simple man - I see b&w helicopter - I hear CCR in my head :)

  • @D.E.Middleton
    @D.E.Middleton Год назад

    Howard, where ever you are… thank you.

  • @iznbrgwhite421
    @iznbrgwhite421 Год назад +1

    Just look at the massive helicopters the US is starting to put in service. MASSIVE . Great clip!

  • @carlmontney7916
    @carlmontney7916 Год назад +6

    Another great video from dark skies. Well done sir. Well done. The lesson I learned from this video is when big just isn't big enough, who do you call? Howard Hughes that's who.

  • @JohnCoffins
    @JohnCoffins Год назад +3

    I had the pleasure of watching 3 AH-64s fly over my house last night. My daughter got to see them too. I didn't know what they were until I saw them but they were pretty loud. Probably took 30 seconds or so before I saw them and I first heard them when I was in my house. I knew it would be cool whatever it is lol

  • @rulingmoss5599
    @rulingmoss5599 Год назад +4

    Unrelated, but I had a formation of 4 apaches fly over my house once, I can confirm they were EXTREMELY loud even at the somewhat high altitude they were at.

    • @dennisyoung4631
      @dennisyoung4631 Год назад

      Chinooks can be loud, too.
      Couple of those things flew over - at low altitude - where I live a few years back. They shook the ground.

    • @jeffalvich9434
      @jeffalvich9434 Год назад

      When lived nearby, Sundays were pre-delivery test flight days... where the helicopters built during the week would be flown over our neighborhoods and out over the ocean. A few people complained about the 'noise", but it would always be mid-morning, about the same time every Sunday, and most everyone felt proud that their work was being delivered, ensuring our military personnel would come home safe.......... The sad part, no one on these projects were even allowed to say they worked at HAC due to the tight security.

  • @seancollins9745
    @seancollins9745 Год назад +3

    It's not about making something ridiculous work, it's about learning all the lessons along the way. We used to be fearless in the face of failure and it allowed for incredible innovations and learning to take place. Now, not so much.

    • @user-kq8et4kw4b
      @user-kq8et4kw4b Год назад

      Congratulations 👍 you have been selected among the shortlisted winner's,
      Send a message via TELEGRAM to acknowledge your Prize.🎁🎁

  • @ealingwest5750
    @ealingwest5750 Год назад +3

    Wow... well done you for educating me on an obscure historic air craft, keep up the good work this is what the interweb is all about, education, information and wonder.

  • @Montana_horseman
    @Montana_horseman Год назад +7

    That is truly a Frankencopter. Very interesting bit of chopper history. 👍

  • @ag7898
    @ag7898 Год назад +2

    If you are an American aircraft company that needs an idea or actual aircraft that is absolutely bat shit crazy, there are two people to go to. One was Kelly Johnson. The other was Howard Hughs!

  • @williambarrett70
    @williambarrett70 Год назад +1

    When I a Signal Corps guy in 1970, an AMPAC engineer ordered a kit and built a built a one-man 'copter. Only flew it a little, then a Thai Army chopper followed him back and they stayed and watched as he dismantled it and boxed it to ship
    back home.

  • @oneshotme
    @oneshotme Год назад +1

    Enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up

  • @hecklepig
    @hecklepig Год назад +5

    Yeah you need to hear the Osprey. Those things are so freakin loud you hear those coming for miles too.

  • @Paiadakine
    @Paiadakine Год назад +4

    I admire Hughes Aircraft. They took on projects no one else would attempt. HAC had many firsts. Not all made money but progress was made.

    • @jeffalvich9434
      @jeffalvich9434 Год назад

      You're right! I can say that many of the projects were "handed" to either HAC or Aerospace Corporation by the government when other companies just could not "make them work". This included the Tomahawk Missile (Raytheon originally), Phalanx defense system (General Dynamics originally) just to name a few......

  • @Richardrefund
    @Richardrefund Год назад +4

    With a video title like that, I would liked to have heard some audio of it flying. Great video.

    • @user-kq8et4kw4b
      @user-kq8et4kw4b Год назад

      Congratulations 👍 you have been selected among the shortlisted winner's,
      Send a message via TELEGRAM to acknowledge your Prize.💥💫🌟

  • @marcosacceleronhotwheels2806
    @marcosacceleronhotwheels2806 Год назад +1

    thats one heck of a franken helicopter
    im surprised this many parts from different machines didn't just fell apart

  • @billp.8489
    @billp.8489 Год назад +11

    Hughes was a strange and unusual man who wasn't afraid to take on what were for that era strange and unusual projects.

    • @byloyuripka9624
      @byloyuripka9624 Год назад

      Maybe you should squeeze and ambitious in your description somewhere too. What have you accomplished with your life?

    • @perpetualgrin5804
      @perpetualgrin5804 Год назад +3

      @@byloyuripka9624 Bill p post isn't negative but yours is, aggressive one.

  • @jeremybr2020
    @jeremybr2020 Год назад +2

    The rotors were hollow and had a short shelf life and could snap at any moment? They've said that twice now. This seems like a deal breaker to me, and going back to the drawing board, a must. I mean what kind of sane pilot would attempt to fly something like that?

    • @user-kq8et4kw4b
      @user-kq8et4kw4b Год назад

      Congratulations 👍 you have been selected among the shortlisted winner's,
      Send a message via TELEGRAM to acknowledge your Prize.🎁🎁

    • @jeffalvich9434
      @jeffalvich9434 Год назад

      That was the "concern" of some "Experts" outside of the company...... Inside, they were confident they had a solid principle that they could succeed with.

  • @comcastjohn
    @comcastjohn Год назад +2

    I liked all of your videos that I have seen here and your other channels. I have learned a lot and appreciate the history as well. Thank you for all that you do and keep up the great work!

  • @motorTranz
    @motorTranz Год назад

    I've had the privilege of going on helicopter rides in a Hughes 300 and 500 models. Fascinating story! Thank you!

  • @Physhi
    @Physhi Год назад +1

    Modern tech today could make that thing a reality. It's interesting from an engineering perspective.

  • @garyh.8082
    @garyh.8082 Год назад +3

    You ever hear a CH53E coming in hard?
    You can hear those from 20 miles away!

  • @robertnichols2283
    @robertnichols2283 Год назад +4

    Apparently Howard Hughes philosophy was “go big or go home”
    And it worked

  • @badlaamaurukehu
    @badlaamaurukehu Год назад +7

    This is like a Mad Max scrapper's build.

  • @bob_._.
    @bob_._. Год назад +3

    Not only gigantic rotor blades, but gigantic rotor blades with afterburners.

  • @liddz434
    @liddz434 Год назад +8

    I would love to see a modern take on this design...Could you imagine how powerful they could make it these days!?

    • @jesusisalive3227
      @jesusisalive3227 Год назад +4

      I was thinking the same thing, with today's materials they could make the rotors strong and heat resistant. Seems like missed opportunity to me.

    • @liddz434
      @liddz434 Год назад +1

      @@jesusisalive3227 absolutely! I know there’s already other ‘sky cranes’ out there but a newer version of this would be bonkers!

    • @robertpatrick3350
      @robertpatrick3350 Год назад

      Fairey with their rotadyne programme and prototype showed that major improvements were possible

  • @williamheyman5439
    @williamheyman5439 Год назад +1

    You can hear ANY helicopter from "seven or eight miles away." I was on the Test and Evaluation for the 11th Air Assault Division, which became the 1st Cavalry Division, and I have an Air Medal for being the ground commander in the back seat of a Huey in Vietnam. If the weather is right, you hear them coming. If the weather is wrong, you don't. Mostly a function of the environment. Anyway, they never fielded that concept, so it is kind of moot.

  • @phil4986
    @phil4986 Год назад +5

    Great video.
    I expected to hear ,"The craft got fifty feet in the air, started shaking and exploded into pieces , killing it's pilot and closing the Hughes division for good."
    I'm glad it ended well and the Hughes corporation made good on the effort.
    Kind of reminds me of how Howard got the Spruce Goose to fly for a short distance and then parked it permanently.
    He made his point and moved on from there with more successes.
    No need to test failure.

  • @felixmcbride5448
    @felixmcbride5448 Год назад

    The information and video footage repeats itself after the first minute.

  • @chuckcawthon3370
    @chuckcawthon3370 Год назад +2

    Incredible Video and what a monstrosity of machinery. Well Done Sir.

  • @Cherb123456
    @Cherb123456 Год назад

    Wow! Cool! Thank you!

  • @Mrgunsngear
    @Mrgunsngear Год назад

    Thanks

  • @sincerewyd2285
    @sincerewyd2285 Год назад

    1 word: Beautiful.

  • @rynamo4013
    @rynamo4013 Год назад +5

    Yeah but could you hear fortunate son from 7 or 8 miles away?

  • @jpdive8664
    @jpdive8664 Год назад +1

    The narrator mentioned the historical date this sky crane took it's successful first flight was October 23rd 1952. And I'm watching this Documentary for the first time October 23rd 2022..... .. .exactly 70 years when this took place.

  • @ffjsb
    @ffjsb Год назад +8

    What an interesting helicopter, never heard of it until now. What isn't mentioned is that it was shelved due to it being highly inefficient, and it only had a 30-40 mile range. I couldn't find any information on what became of it though.

    • @geoh7777
      @geoh7777 Год назад +1

      "Status Scrapped" (Wikipedia)

  • @oscartango2348
    @oscartango2348 Год назад +5

    I live near a military base, and I'm pretty sure you can hear any military helicopter from 10 miles away.

  • @bertdellaluna5612
    @bertdellaluna5612 Год назад

    wow! look at those rotor blades!

  • @frisk151
    @frisk151 Год назад +5

    This helicopter is insane... I'd like to hear it compared to the CH-53. It's hard to fathom anything being louder than the Sea Stallion... Or, even the Chinook at distance... The low rotor RPM on this helicopter is just mind boggling... I get the blade size, but when I first flew in a UH-1 Huey, I couldn't believe we lifted off at that RPM. I wonder what the controls felt like? Must have been sluggish... I'm surprised the tail blades could actually keep up with the mains torque...

    • @whoknows8678
      @whoknows8678 Год назад +4

      Watch the video again. There was no torque from the main rotor since it was tip jet driven. That's why they were able to use such a tiny tail rotor as all they had to overcome was friction from the main bearing in the swashplate.

    • @_MaxHeadroom_
      @_MaxHeadroom_ Год назад

      About the torque 4:46

    • @josh10177
      @josh10177 Год назад

      With tip jets there really wasn't any need for a tail rotor as the torque isn't coinciding with the helos center of gravity. I supposed they used a tail rotor for better stabilization.

    • @josh10177
      @josh10177 Год назад

      @@whoknows8678 could you imagine the Temps that swash plate bearing would reach?

  • @BADBADGER18
    @BADBADGER18 Год назад

    Im glad to see the narrator slowing down on speaking. When i watched the channel a while ago he spoke super fast making it difficult to understand

  • @thedarkknight1971
    @thedarkknight1971 Год назад

    JEEEEEEZUZ that's a BIG B!TCH !! Thanks for that, until now, I didn't even know that existed. I had hear/seen videos of other Helicopter type vehicles that had propellas driven at the wig tips, but this, it's on a nother level!

  • @Rimraz
    @Rimraz Год назад +1

    Just like a Hughes 500. Extreme adrenaline.

  • @chuckcawthon3370
    @chuckcawthon3370 2 месяца назад

    Outstanding Story.

  • @j6077xxd
    @j6077xxd Год назад

    Your narration is exquisite now buddy!!

  • @bradrankin844
    @bradrankin844 Год назад +1

    WOW!!!
    See that’s amazing to me! I had no idea that Howard Hughes had something to do with the Apache helicopter?! I was in the Army and was in the Iraqi war from 2002-2005. Mduring that time bye, Road in quite a number of military aircraft. And I never learned ANY of this cool information.!!Thank you very much for this info👌👍

    • @jeffalvich9434
      @jeffalvich9434 Год назад +2

      My wife worked at Hughes Helicopters and was part of the team that created the Apache AH 64 Helicopter! The avionics/weapon systems for the Cobra was developed there as well (but a different team). Although the plant site was small (by comparison), they had always had a very close relationship with Bell & Sikorski (including Howard himself)! There were many SAP/SAR (above top-secret) helicopters and related avionics projects that were successfully created there.... my wife worked on the LHX (which regardless of what is told actually was produced), NOTAR and a variety of highly specialized "stealth" type helicopters for special purposes... including a handful of special purpose (special forces) built for the Olympics in Europe and when we had the Olympics in Los Angeles (1980's0 Hughes built specially modified Hughes 500 helo's for the "show"!
      Culver City was also the site where the "Gatling Gun" issues were resolved. Developed by other companies in water cooled, air cooled and hydraulic cooled versions, they each suffered from heat related jamming at one point or another. HAC was asked to take on the problem, and they did. The back side road off of Lincoln had a yellow light posted with a sign that said "if this light is flashing do not enter". This was for (safety reasons" when they were doing gatling gun testing or "special" engine testing (the exhaust discharge was pointing towards the part of the roadway).
      Thsi was also where they developed "The Quiet One", literally the 1st stealth helicopter for the CIA... it was used in the early days of Vietnam, IIRR it was Hughes 500, they redesigned the rotor blades to create increased lift, used 4 rotor blades instead of 2 which then they slowed the rotor blade speed about 50% (IIRR), used a radar absorbing paint and then affixed/developed a "White Noise" generator to cancel out rotor blade sound... and developed a new exhaust system/muffler for the engine which allowed the aircraft to fly literally just above the treelines, go undetected until it had passed over you.

  • @alexabadi7458
    @alexabadi7458 Год назад

    Thank you.

  • @rickhibdon11
    @rickhibdon11 Год назад

    Man I just LOVE these type of videos!

  • @nicholasalonzo7824
    @nicholasalonzo7824 Год назад +8

    Wish you had the sound that the blades made, in your very informative video. Great work my friend.

    • @terry_willis
      @terry_willis Год назад

      It sounded like this: THUNKA THUNKA THWAP - THUNKA THUNKA THWAP. Except much louder.

    • @deca0
      @deca0 Год назад

      @@terry_willis lmao

  • @brianv1988
    @brianv1988 Год назад +1

    Can you imagine what they could do if they had the technology that they do today I'm surprised nobody has tried to make a helicopter that big again in modern day it would be cool to see

    • @allangibson8494
      @allangibson8494 Год назад +2

      Look up the Mil V-12…
      What you get when you try to build a version of the C-130 but as a helicopter…
      196 passenger capacity.

  • @jondoe5392
    @jondoe5392 Год назад

    sad story: I wanted to be a helicopter instructor as a child but ended up doing 20yrs of manual labor. Awesome video! Peace and God bless.

    • @phungquang564
      @phungquang564 Год назад

      You should fight hard for your dreams. Fight like "if you don't fight, you die". That's how Howard Hughes made his dreams works.

  • @creepycraiyons3519
    @creepycraiyons3519 Год назад

    I used to live near a Navy Seal training area. A location used for a scene in a certain movie featuring real Seals.
    One night at dusk I knew they were training and using the airfield next to my home.
    I walked out to see. Sometimes they’re riding in a boat under a Chinook or something crazy like that. Hell. They’ve even para dropped into my high school commons area one morning.
    Anyways. Stepped out and I heard a sudden whoosh of air and saw what looked like a black hawk with edges more similar to stealth fighters. It was over me when I heard it and very low just over the trees. The silhouette was very visible against the setting sun.
    It was definitely one of those stealth blackhawks. It was eerily quiet. Like wind. But not even a strong wind.

  • @aphaes1
    @aphaes1 Год назад +1

    If I had a time machine I would go back in time to see maiden flights of all aircraft

  • @webbscorpio
    @webbscorpio Год назад

    I love all ur channels!

  • @ochjoo77
    @ochjoo77 Год назад +1

    What a mean looking contraption 🙂 I love that this existed

    • @user-kq8et4kw4b
      @user-kq8et4kw4b Год назад

      Congratulations 👍 you have been selected among the shortlisted winner's,
      Send a message via TELEGRAM to acknowledge your Prize.🎁🎁

  • @dutchman7216
    @dutchman7216 Год назад +2

    Does anybody know if this aircraft was actually scrapped or is it in a museum somewhere?

  • @saltycanadian6190
    @saltycanadian6190 Год назад

    I live by a military airbase, I’ve heard every type of NATO fighter. F22- god damn. That isn’t loud, it’s harmonically loud. It vibrates your bones.

  • @m3photo726
    @m3photo726 Год назад +1

    You can thank Hughes for the NOTAR too.

    • @jeffalvich9434
      @jeffalvich9434 Год назад +2

      Yup, my wife worked on that program too!

  • @YukariPhi
    @YukariPhi Год назад

    I can hear you have slowed down the speed that you speak, very enjoyable to listen to

  • @vagellan_8842
    @vagellan_8842 Год назад

    YESS!!! MORE HOWARD HUGHES STUFF!

  • @williamfitzpatrick4533
    @williamfitzpatrick4533 Год назад +1

    Thinking we need to see the same 5 video clips more than 10 times.

  • @YouTube_user3333
    @YouTube_user3333 Год назад

    Brings new meaning to the saying, go big or go home!

  • @nimueh4298
    @nimueh4298 Год назад +1

    With all the talk about how it sound it would be nice to actually hear it.

  • @drmarkintexas-400
    @drmarkintexas-400 Год назад +1

    🏆🏆🏆✌️🇺🇲🙏
    Thank you for sharing.

  • @boltonky
    @boltonky Год назад +1

    Amazing Technology and its just crazy when you consider scale compared to what they end up like which they could of technically done back then if they had the knowledge.
    As humans we tend to forget so much we will have the same goal but end up with multiple ways to get there

  • @dans9463
    @dans9463 Год назад

    In 1952, I arrived close to Hughes Aircraft company, when I was born.

  • @B86432
    @B86432 Год назад +2

    An Apache almost landed on top of my vehicle on the range one nite ......that was close call

  • @RodimusPrime
    @RodimusPrime Год назад +1

    Can we get a documentary on Airwolf and its classified tech

  • @stevensims3342
    @stevensims3342 Год назад +2

    The speed of the outer most part of that giant rotor must have been insane.

  • @wayneyd2
    @wayneyd2 Год назад +4

    You can hear an UH-1M for over 10 miles.

  • @waylandsmith
    @waylandsmith Год назад +3

    I've been enjoying these videos, but I've been feeling like some of them are pretty much just reading from a Wikipedia article. This video is particularly guilty in that regard, with 2 of the 5 paragraphs of the Wikipedia article copied almost exactly. It's one thing to use Wikipedia as a research tool, but quite another to copy significant chunks of an article without even credit.

    • @MrSpaz12
      @MrSpaz12 Год назад

      Sweet, it's about time someone screwed Wikipedia. Nothing but a bunch of wacko lefties running it into the ground anyway.

  • @MRptwrench
    @MRptwrench Год назад +1

    I could hear the XH-17 with my speakers off.

  • @MWSin1
    @MWSin1 Год назад

    Howard Hughes: Why should I buy your helicopter design?
    Wallace Kellet: It's big.
    Howard Hughes: Shut up and take my money!

  • @songsinthedrawer
    @songsinthedrawer Год назад

    Great video. I had not seen this helicopter. Thanks for posting.

  • @BrandonSLedford
    @BrandonSLedford Год назад +2

    I wanna know why you didn't choose 7 miles or 8 miles instead of titling it that way ??? haha

  • @rayceeya8659
    @rayceeya8659 Год назад +2

    Ahhh it was a jet tip rotor. Surprised these haven't turned up in Kerbal Space Program.

  • @paulrust316
    @paulrust316 Год назад

    AWSUM video. Love seeing this sort of stuff. Keep it up. Thanks!

    • @user-kq8et4kw4b
      @user-kq8et4kw4b Год назад

      Congratulations 👍 you have been selected among the shortlisted winner's,
      Send a message via TELEGRAM to acknowledge your Prize.🎁

  • @cypriandraku
    @cypriandraku Год назад

    pretty sweet vid

  • @jcee2259
    @jcee2259 Год назад +1

    I run to get a clear view of blade noise I'd heard so often in a foreign war.
    Loud and heard for miles, it was. Returning with the dead and living I'd
    see a brief cloud of blood sucked outside as the side doors opened. My
    line-hung laundry had a pink tint thanks to a downward rush of soiled air.

  • @drstevenrey
    @drstevenrey Год назад +1

    I wonder, Hughes Helicopters all have at least 3, 5 or 7 blades, was that due to the experience here. It is a great ship but only two blades seems a little overkill. Had he used 7 or even 9 blades, smaller and thinner and slightly more rpm, it would have been perfect.

  • @Ekocart1
    @Ekocart1 Год назад

    Amazing