The most beautiful sentence in this entire video: "We went to explore moon, but founded Earth 🌍" and hence we realised how valuable it is. Celebrating Earth day. 👍🏼
I am aware this is old news that I some how missed. I would like to say I support this. I am ok with my taxes helping to fund the space programs. I truly believe that this should be a world effort. Backed by all countries and completed together. Us, the, people of earth, together, WE did this.
You are ok with your taxes going to this? Cool. Now here is the more important question. Are you ok for other people to be forced by threat of imprisonment to pay taxes towards this?
@@chrischandler889 Not at all. No one should be threatened. However, there should be an option on our tax forms to donate whatever you feel. Families living under poverty should also be exempt.
@@chrischandler889 that would be wonderful in a perfect world. Unfortunately, most wouldn't give anything. I wish things were different. All we can do is vote for the best option.
My dad had a co-worker who was somewhat older than he, who loved to tell a story about Sputnik. While his physics teacher was in the middle of a lecture about how aerodynamics and the limitations of chemical energy made it impossible to put an artificial satellite in orbit someone came to the classroom to tell them about Sputnik 1.
Interesting. Sputnik was launched at night in Russia and Europe (around 10pm in France), and was first detected by radio-observers a couple hours later in the middle of the night in the USA, most people woke up to the news. I'd be curious to know who was holding physics classes in the AM hours.
@@LiberalsGettheBulletToo I'd be more curious to know which lecturers are up in the AM hours waiting for news from Europe when they have a lecture the next day. Sputnik was launched in 1957, quite a few decades before 24 hour news was a thing. Time Magazine wrote a week later how the news broke in the US. At a cocktail party for the International Year of Geophysics attended by 50 scientists from 13 nations in the Russian Embassy on 16th st in Washington, New York Times Reporter Walter Sullivan was called away from the party to take an urgent phone call from his paper breaking the news to him that evening, 2 hours after the final news broadcast for the night, where he in turn relayed the news to Lloyd Berkner, a physicist who was at the time the president of the Comité Spéciale de l’Année Géophysique Internationale, who then announced the news to the guests, congratulating his Soviet peers on their achievement. This tells us the NYT heard the news that night, which means it would have made the press the following morning. Morning TV news wasn't really a thing so your assertion "most people in the US woke up to the news" makes no sense whatsoever. The first public reports came out on radio the morning after, it's not at all inconceivable that people would interrupt a physics lecture to break such important scientific news. Indeed, most Americans would have found out either reading a morning paper or that evening on TV. And Americans were never exactly famous for their love of reading as I'm sure you would know. Oh and nice user name, really sets the tone for anyone making an estimation of your intellectual capacity. Hope you made it through all the big words and facts, Cleetus. I know how you alt right wingnuts hate both of those things.
Before Sputnik my physics teacher in grade 9 told our class that in order to go into space and arrive at the desired target they would have to aim with precision because you can't steer in space. I immediately told him he was wrong because of a simple and basic physics law. EVERY ACTION HAS AND EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION. Later that year our geometry teacher told us that he and all the other students had worked all day on a problem that nobody was able to solve. Our class was the last one of the day. I answered it correctly in less than a minute. I was absent more days than present and still passed all my exams. I was too bored to keep going and quit school with a high school diploma. Now as I look back I wish I had gone one to become an engineer.
When the man says "This is when we discovered Earth", it is epic. From that moment on, every one should listen to this man. NEIL will be remembered for centuries, with this sentence. This will be his famous quote for the mankinkind.
No matter what a person thinks of Mr. Tyson you have to give that he's very passionate. And I believe we need more people like him in the fields of science and research. People who not only share this drive and passion but who will push forward to educate others and share the passion.
Indeed, if we ever become free from the goals of profit and infiltration of greed. Science will take its rightful place. Unfortunately, with the politics of debasement in play, this will be very difficult. as a man of science myself I remain hopeful my species will see it for what it is. More truth and less magical....
1:13:+ .... ''received goods of others''... Emirates can afford research but easier just buying from others what they don't really need. Wonder if the compare/ministers felt that Freudian SLAP
@@LlamaOccident So you're suggesting that there's a limit to the amount of money you'd be willing to part with, even if it were absolutely necessary to ensure your own survival? Suicide is extremely anomalous behavior, the _overwhelming_ majority of individuals would prefer poverty over death. Your youtube comment history strongly suggests that you're here because you get off on posting anything contradictory, even if it's total nonsense. You're clearly an idiot.
@@phxgen I was just saying that some people's obsession with death is a symptom of their neurotic hypochondriac personality type which is an ANOMALOUS minority. So his statement should have been "some people will do anything to prevent dying" which takes some of the kick out of the phrase and makes it somewhat meaningless as you kind find some people willing to go to great lengths to do just about anything. Only an ANOMALOUS minority of people are obsessed with death and among those some are eager for death (self-destructive) while others are obsessed with warding it away (neurotic hypochondriac). It's nice to see that the pedantic wordplay enthusiast fedora species is still alive and well on the internet as it's always so interesting to encounter their bizarre self-invented rules of logic. Why does a small minority of people being suicidal somehow stop mattering because it's anomalous? Do the behaviours of rich people not matter because there are only a few of them? The biggest psychological type isn't even a majority of people, only a plurality. I just love people who argue through ad hominem attacks, convoluted wordplay, and the illusion of statistics without actually stating them (saying the rate of self-destructive behaviors is vaguely ANOMALOUS without giving anything close to any kind of percentage). Self-destructiveness is a common trait to human nature, just look at diet and addictions for evidence of that. Look up Freud's concept of the death drive and contemplate how supposedly life hungry human beings could vigorously leap into two world wars that killed over a hundred million people.
@@LlamaOccident "I was just saying that some people's obsession with death is a symptom of their neurotic hypochondriac personality type which is an ANOMALOUS minority." Oh hell, how incredibly daft of me. What you meant is so obvious now. How on earth did I initially fail to extrapolate that whole novella from this single sentence? "That's such a moronic thing to say, seeing how many people kill themselves." "So his statement should have been "some people will do anything to prevent dying" which takes some of the kick out of the phrase and makes it somewhat meaningless..." The original "people will spend almost any amount of money to not die" is every bit as vague, kick-free, and meaningless. Not "all people," or even "most people," just "people." Not "any amount of money," just "almost any amount of money." The only thing I find more befuddling about this thread than anyone considering the NDT version to be something deep or meaningful, is you considering it important enough to hammer out a giant paragraph explaining why he should have instead said something so equally drab. "...the illusion of statistics without actually stating them..." Oh I know, right?!? Fucking people. So uhhh, how many people kill themselves? "Why does a small minority of people being suicidal stop mattering because it's anomalous? Do the behaviors of rich people not matter because there are only a few of them?" Where the fuck did I or anyone in this thread say anything at all like tha- Oh, wait. I think I did use the word "anomalous," didn't I? Of course, it's only natural to assume that was me implying that suicide doesn't matter. Everybody should kill themselves. Or nobody should. Whatever, I don't give a FUCK! Further, I think rich people should be allowed to... no, _compelled_ to eat toddlers. Live ones, feet first! Man, some of us sure are good at accurately inferring a whoooole lot from very, very little these days. Totally reasonable to extrapolate "all self-destructive behavior" from my use of the word "suicide" as well. I guess I need to be a lot more careful with my words. Damn my rotten old brain, always forgetting which individual characters betray all of my elaborate and morally repugnant convictions! Seriously though, did I say "anomalous?" I wonder if I said "anomalous." "...pedantic..." Haha. "...convoluted wordplay..." HAHA. Your RUclips comment history continues to suggest that you get off on being contradictory. I no longer think that you're clearly an idiot though, I apologize for that. Whatever you are, it's something far more esoteric. Probably just existing on a level several bong-rips above mine.
@@lucasm8016 I used to think he was a cool guy, but then I started to pay attention to what he says and what he backs. And now the World Government Summit, and Davos/WEF? F^%k off Globalists and the stupid sheep who drink your Kool-Aid in the name of "Science" and "Eco-ism." Its just 21st century fascism and I ain't biting.
Because even if god created the universe Jesus being on earth 2000 years ago means nothing in the timeline of our universe. Or even greatly misrepresented. The dude told us to love eachother and not kill or judge one another. ( pretty simple values to live by) and we killed him. Could you imagine the advances we would have if we weren’t fighting eachother over pretend borders? Imagine a human symbiosis of intelligence and values. To not kill eachother but to build eachother
I'm planning to study astrophysics and possibly try to become an astronaut with the PhD. Watching the progress SpaceX has made is amazing. Watching the rockets come back down and land on literal DRONE SHIPS is absolutely amazing and gives me hope for the future of space travel.
Whatever floats your boat, although even if that was economically viable, id still wouldn't see how it out now impressive than moon landing or pioneer probes, etc. You know, great things people have done decades ago, not moderately interesting things people are doing today and claiming that it will be great later, but not making any sense.
I would offer having consulted with JPL, NASA, then SpaceX and non-government entities...there is a considerable, unspoken nearly unquestioning 'Religion' with regards to the purpose and methods of approach to humanity in space. JPL and NASA are about science and research which requires a specific methodical approach. Discovery and Engineering of the private sector is very different....and they can drive each other insane. JPL & NASA focus on the perfect methods and methodical implementation - private sector focus is on the most effective, efficient...decisive implementation. Elon launches rockets knowing they will fail - learning in the process. NASA will can't take risks or waste tax-payers money, so it has to be perfect and planned. They can't include failure, it's not on the table.
@Bobb Grimley Gtfoh, who the hell are you to shit on someone else’s dreams, clearly your life sucks ass, ya gotta small one and mad at the world about it, or live in your moms basement 😂
Host: "we are running out of time" Neil: goes on a 15 min. rant Host: "and there you have it ladies and gentlemen" Neil: "waitwaitwait just 1 question i promise i'l give a quick answer!" Host: "k" Neil: gives a 6 min. answer Host: -_-
That is what everyone does who is passionate about their work. Ask any old auto mechanic what ails your car by just talking to him. He will elaborate for several minutes about the many possibilities and then remind you in the end, " I could get it running right away but please realize that your vehicle, at its age, is about to have many more problems. The water pump will be going within a year, the alternator has only so much more time, etc. All cars started falling apart the day they were bought."
drakeequation521 basically what your saying is....listen to the guy that sounds like he knows what he’s talking about, because I can’t be arsed finding out what he’s talking about!, I’ll just take a “professionals” point of view because he’s called a professional by people I’ll never know meet or collaborate with EVER! Your opinion means nothing to anyone that can think for themselves........nXt breath good luck with life!f8L
@@freezatron what a great thought about one of our fellow human beings. War criminals can be friends nowadays, but someone speaking some words can go to hell. What a world we live in, why are the likes of you thinking like this? It's a shame. It's a sad, sad world we live in.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson is my favourite scientist. He explains energetically, easy to understand, funny way. i very much like to listen to his lectures. thank you.
He is a complete douche. Full narcissist that controls every discussion down to the simple topics he have repeated in from other real scientists. If you're not humble as a scientist, how the h-ll are you going to accept the details that you should be looking for. He only wants to rant in front of people and play intelligent hero. I know he's not as smart hes trying to act. For some, it's very obvious.
@@SMHman666 Pops up in the feed, I check about half and get the same impressions as before. Types some comments to his immature groupies and happens to offend a bunch of youngsters cheering over his big brains. And you clearly couldnt hold the tears back. Im sorry.
This is a scammer a religious man his religious teaching are based on the same shit other religions are based on faith and doctrine meaning you have to believe it so hard that if anyone says it’s bullshit you get offended doctrine cuz anything outside of this fantasy is ludacris
A fantastic, enlightening presentation. I loved the way you moved from the past to the future effortlessly and steered clear of politics, yet embraced the subject as a reality too. Your summary at the end was perfect, let the different branches of science work together to discover more. Thank you so much for the reality. 🙏
Neil's explanation of why you do these things, the unknown long term benefits, is the most important reason to do R&D on the scale that we in the US tend to stay away from these days. This research in the past on the scales it used to be on is what made the US great. That we stopped doing these things on those scales is a major reason we are in decline.
Tyson is not a genius. He is a manipulative weasel. Here are the facts. WHY E=MC2 IS NECESSARILY AND CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE: Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. C4 is the proof of the fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. This explains the fourth dimension. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity.) The EARTH/ground AND what is THE SUN are CLEARLY (on balance) E=MC2 AS F=ma. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! (Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.) The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. Great !!! This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. By Frank DiMeglio
@@dberry999666 Why would anyone think Neil deGrasse Tyson is a Carl Sagan? Neil is a communicator first who has spent his life learning about science. Carl was a Scientist who did lots of research and learned how to communicate that. Both people and both skills are very important to Scientific discovery. If you cannot communicate what has been learned, what is theorized, what is considered fairly solid and why then other cannot learn from and build upon (or disprove) those thoughts. As to for NASA, no straight answer, his job is his job. You might notice that almost all managers at that level provide squishy answers to most things. That is their job. Not that I like that, but I get it. To change that, we have to change how things are funded, how challenges are viewed and how short sighted most people are.
Elon Musk is building rockets because he sees economic opportunities. It is noteworthy that he is currently making over a billion dollars per year in sales of his rockets (gross profits here, not net). His satellite project is definitely all about the money.
@@GlanderBrondurg Elon was just asked recently about if he wants to send people to Mars because of the threat of global warming and he said no, it was the idea of doing what hasn't been done. It was about exploring space and because it's cool. I There won't be any money out of going to Mars for decades and maybe never or at least many many decades.
I dont know. Mr Tyson saus theres no evidence of ufos and yet we now have us navy tactical data of solud controled vehocles that defy what we know of the laws of physics. The capitalist system is now failibg and totally manipulated. Climate wise weve had a ten year warning from the most conservatice climate scientists and yet were continuing to increase total co2 emmisions globally. So maybe the profit motive is less relavent that the dobt have all your eggs in one basket.. Anyway just saying.
I studied physics and astronomy in college in the '70's and I have watched dozens of Mr. Tyson's videos. I'm impressed with Mr. Tyson and his passion and energy traveling around the world educating people about astrophysics and science in general. I don't remember disagreeing with him about anything. I hate reading negative comments people posted. The world needs more scientists like Tyson.
@@TheRoguelement I agree. His behavior is of a bully and a self righteous zealot. All his examples from the historical is also stupid. So simple and self serving. I was actually waiting for his point but there was non.
Yeah, people who like government and not people will agree with you. He said that individuals will never do an Elon Musk and then totally turn the argument up side down. His arguments are not with honesty or for purpose of educating in mind. He seems very agenda driven. I could be wrong, I don’t know the guy personally but what I see on that what comes out on medias to be to self serving and contradictory to truth to give him a pass on liability.
He's not so much a scientist as a science communicator. He is very negative and hostile to people of faith and that hurts the advancement of humanity overall. Also, he is a bit nieve about how dangerous some countries have shown themselves to be to a free society. But hey, nobody is perfect.
The most profound talk I have ever observed since my 40+ years on this pale blue planet. Neil has a way of extrapolating complex subjects into consumable and digestible knowledge. Nowhere else you will find this. So much so I can’t miss an episode of Star Talk. I’m not even in the field of Astrophysics. Nowhere close, but the knowledge attained from Neil aid me in my VR R&D projects. Two words. Knowledge Transfer. Take a sun of its parts to further advance what it is you are doing around STEM.
He's my number one pick to have a dinner with. I'd be like please pass the wine and he'd just start up and go..............four hours later he might stop talking and I would be disappointed if he did.
I was cooking dinner watching a RUclips videos and I have auto play on. I'm damn glad I did. This has nothing to do with the subject video I was watching but I'm glad it played. What a great listen/watch. Mr Tysons owned this conference.
This is the second time I have watched this, my only hope is enough world leaders take on board and implement the massively important points he made, Neil is awesome, if I were to develop a man-crush, it would be him no doubt about it.
Yes, Tyson is incredible! I've heard people say that he hasn't personally discovered anything significant, yet, while that may be true, what he HAS done is to make science, technology, indeed the very ACT of discovery itself accessible, understandable, even DESIRABLE to entire generations of people, young and old, world-wide! To me, that is more important and valuable than ANY specific discovery or innovation! Cheers to you, Neil!
@@flurng Nobody is going to space, it's a lie. Nobody ever never went to the moon, it's all special effects, drawings and CGIs, the ISS is a Sesame Street format for kids' indoctrination into the biggest lie of all.
As someone from the 3rd. World, I and most people I know, always knew that the spacial race is drive by: 1. Obtain military superiority (to impose your interests over others) 2. Dominante the communications sector, because it is strategic to maintain a dominante position and because it means big money. 3. Propaganda: demostrarte who is more powerful, have a better future and should be followed. Of course, working on the spacial sector there are people that "loves" the knowledge and thinks that the sector is essential for the future of human kind. But that is not the people that takes the big decitions (involving big money and resources). The people that takes the decitions are the very powerful and very rich that are interested in increasing their power and richness and not in the future of of human kind. Common people in central countries are completely obnubilated by the propaganda and may feel some surprise in hearing conferences like this.
I’m a former Mormon. Just before humans went to the moon, I read in a Mormon priesthood manual that Mormon prophet Joseph F. Smith (or Joseph Fielding Smith, I forget) said that humans would never go to the moon because humans were meant by god to live only on earth. Joseph Smith (the founder of Mormonism), however, claimed there were humans living on the moon that dress like Quakers. Brigham Young, the successor to Joseph Smith, claimed there were intelligent “inhabitants of the Sun” living on the sun. The only defense I have for having believed that stuff is that I was only about 14.
7:26 Neil: “By the year 2000, Fifty thousand people”… My brain: “…used to live here. Now it’s a ghost town.” - Cpt. MacMillan, 2007 Nostalgia hits hard 😢
Miles Gore this was a competition between Boeing and Spacex which resulted in this achievement. So while it is funded by tax dollars, it was competition between two groups, just like the Cold War
This doesn't mean we are going to go to the moon again or mars, nor mine anything and establish a colony.. Dam i hope hes wrong, but saying that, just because it won't happen in our lifetime doesn't mean it won't ever happen.
@Miles Gore It is free enterprise, what are you talking about? SpaceX's cost per kg is orders of magnitude lower than the competitors, that why they were awarded the contract and can still churn a profit. Low-bid contracts are what runs capitalism and government in this country.
@Miles Gore The government is a customer to these companies. Any company that can do it cheaper would get the contract. The government writes the spec and company x will execute at the agreed upon price. That is free enterprise, that is supply & demand, that is capitalism. The fact that you don't understand that invalidates your entire argument. GM contracts almost all of its parts and tools out to its suppliers, that's kind of its business model. Does that mean that GM isn't a profit-driven company in the world of capitalism? Spoiler alert, they still make money, especially when they have a stake in those suppliers. Maybe one day when you're older I'll explain vertical vs. horizontal integration to you.
I actually woke up and spent about an hour contemplating this topic this morning, thinking about how you can possibly predict the future when you can't even know what could happen with technology in twenty years, then I get this video recommended to me almost instantly when I get on RUclips. Bet no one predicted that in the future you'd have mind reading apps
read.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2015-results-volume-i_9789264266490-en#page46 you think Arab Emirates is a scientific powerhouse? their junior high school kids score below Bulgaria, Slovak Republic, Croatia, Lithuania & Hungary
United Arab Emirates · GDP (current US $) $382.58 billion USD (2017). Bulgaria · GDP (current US$) $56.83 billion USD (2017).Slovak Republic · GDP (current US$) $95.77 billion USD (2017).Croatia · GDP (current US$) $54.85 billion USD (2017).Lithuania · GDP (current US$) $47.17 billion USD (2017).Hungary · GDP (current US$) $139.14 billion USD (2017). wow. where'd you get that FOUR YEAR OLD test data on fifteen year old kids? yeah, I think my numbers are more important than yours. your numbers are for kids who are now in college. take ALL FIVE GDPs from TWO years ago and add them together, you get $393.76 BILLION DOLLARS. the UAE has... a Gross Domestic Product $11.18 BILLION dollars BELOW that total. so. what do you think is more important? how much a country is worth in cash and the products it produces, or the fact that their fifteen year old kids scored a little less than TWENTY POINTS lower in every subject than the WORLD WIDE AVERAGE for that 'test' you cited? seriously, fifteen year old kids who are now 19? you thought that was a valid scale to measure a county's ability to fund space exploration?
@@lesliekilgore648 Oil wealth is not a measure of a country's intellectual success or future scientific progress. Science education/literacy and culturoeconomic attitudes towards STEM R&D and projects however, a strong indicator.
last I checked, if you're poor, you don't have the ability to self educate into a post graduate degree in engineering or physics. you're too busy trying to not starve to death. government support of a space program is the first step to getting anything funded. then the government also has to support the lowest levels of education all the way up to the highest levels. that requires a huge 'pipeline of capital' also, UAE has built... ALL THOSE SKYSCRAPERS... if I recall correctly they've built more stories in a shorter timespan than ANY SOCIETY IN HUMAN HISTORY. and they continue to expand. so I do believe that proves their culture is more than capable of supporting very advanced engineering and mathematics systems. even IF THEY HIRED OUT all the architecture designs to foreign corporations, the government would have to plan the infrastructures to support all those buildings, the construction materials supplies, thousands upon thousands of other details. if you believe the Arabian Peninsula is that rich off of only oil? wow, you do not understand ANYTHING about their governments' infrastructures and wealth generation systems. the ENTIRETY of the WHOLE PENINSULA'S oil reserves was initially discovered and developed by the American exploration and oil industry infrastructure expertise. our companies relocated and trained THREE GENERATIONS of employees, almost FIFTY YEARS worth of employees to the US. the Arabians CONTINUE to send many students here to the US who are children and grand-children of oil corporation employees for their educations. the huge profits from the state owned oil corporations in Arabia? they INVEST the largest amounts of their yearly profits all over the world in other companies and industries as well as supporting their own countries. so, the UAE having the FIRST ARAB NATION'S space program doesn't prove to you that they're committed to the industry?
sajindal1, he's misinforming the public. and we'll never colonize space, as space doesn't exist. even Bill Nye, the science guy, admits that mankind is forever stuck on the earth plane. yes, the earth isn't a planet, it's a plane, as evidenced here. ruclips.net/video/vyAh9OENJPU/видео.html
I just love this guy. I love his ability to communicate complex issues to a unsophisticated public. Right or wrong, it is the public who determines if a society will support a technology.
@@livethefuture2492 Maybe in the USA. That's why nothing gets done anymore. Because the public is composed mainly of uneducated , brain-dead morons who's idea of education during high-school in college was to drink their brains out, play "Shake Shake Bang Bang" learn nothing and hate emigrants. And girls... well, those were in their "304 phase"... They learned to sleep around and suck miles of "D"... Actual science? Studying... Nope... They don't need that shit because obviously they're all 10s... Those college morons eventually end up growing up and having a vote. But because they are brain-dead, they don't know what to do with their vote and how to use it... They delegate their power to their congressmen... Yeey... Now those congressmen can go ahead and accept a lot of money from companies who have no interests in supporting technology unless they can make an immediate profit out of it. They user their delegated power to vote however those companies want them to... However in UAE the public hasn't got much of a say. The ruler's gives the order and their word goes. That's why they are light years ahead of USA in terms of education , infrastructure, wealth,and living standards. That's why they can build 3000 ft tall buildings, bring deserts to life, create palm tree shaped artificial islands and all the other shit that can be seen from space. Is because people are different, and the public hasn't got much of a say in what the government does.
@@richiemandina5305 if the quote is factual, does it matter who spoke it?... that might mean that a truthful sounding quote by "Anonymous" can't be truthful or even exist in reality because there is no such person documented in history with the name "Anonymous"...
@@williamghost1516 No need to get all philosophical dude, I just appreciated the quote and noticed that it was credited to a name that his username was cryptically suggestive of.
@@williamghost1516 what's pointless is this interrogation several weeks later from some random, wanting to get to the bottom of a self explanatory comment. It was a little tipping of the hat, if you will, to the "quote" itself and also acknowledging that I didn't just breeze past but took the time to realize he was quoting himself. That's all buddy, mystery solved. Has your curiosity been satiated?
On a tiny scale I saw the difference between industry and science when it comes to making investment decisions first hand. My first years I spent in a public services research facility. Even there, projects were more likely to get funded if they had "practical" applications. But to a much lesser degree as I saw later in my years in industry, where companies would not even want to invest into the successors of their currently profitable products. Exploitation vs exploration over and over again. In my country (germany) I came to conclude that the tax system (and how it forces companies into short term fiscal planning) is a major blocker for innovation. So governments are not always the solution to the problem but sometimes also part of the problem. I feel, that this aspect was left out in this video.
Hey ich bin auch deutscher.Könntest du mir den teil genauer erklärenwo du meinst das unser Steuersystem forschung hindert? Würde mich mal genauer interessieren
I don't agree that's a problem; I don' t even agree that it exists as a thing. Its a matter of perspective. Companies are driven by short term fiscal planning. They want a profit right now if possible, not tomorrow. Developing a product for the market is different from discovering something like particle physics.
@@Pimpmedown There is research in an a sense as it happens in academia and there is research in the sense as it happens in industry. Before a company can invest into new types of products or alternate technologies even in the same domain, some form of research and development needs to be done. For that to be possible, companies need to be able to save up and manage their finances over longer stretches of time (way longer than a year) than the tax rules allow for without having severe penalties. The system penalizes the building up of "war chests" and everything has to be lean. Having surplus and trying to save it up for long term investment simply gets you higher (over the top) taxes as tax wise it counts just like net profit.
@@ruffianeo3418 well so the tax systemonlyprvents research with a higher budget than a company can spare. Savingup for research is fucking stupid. You never know howlongits gonne take so you either work with a continuous amount of money or you dont research stuff. thats how this works. Also i was wondering about your explanation because there is probably no country that supports product-development as much as germany except china or japan.
Excessive taxation such as in Germany only exacerbates the problem by siphoning more money out of corporations, that COULD otherwise have been invested in R&D -- although corporate R&D is tax-deductible in most modern countries, and it is a safe bet that this is also the case in Germany... BUT anyway, the basic issue remains the same: corporations have, by their very profit-oriented nature, no long-term planning; Governments on the other hand MAY. So even if most of that tax money goes down the drain, at least SOME of it, and if only a tiny fraction, still may be used to fund Universities and other public research institutions. That money would otherwise have gone to the investors (or worse: would have been burnt in ruinous acquisitions and mergers). So, it's no as black and white as one may think.
Pretty sure the official figure is 40. My source for that evidence is that I checked our records for the last 100 years and I discovered that it's always 40.
The AEU and people there pushing for science and technology are admirable. To revive the Golden Age of science will have the effect of bringing peace and prosperity in the region. These efforts may influence the retrograde people across the pond in Iran. Those talented Iranians who perish under a backward looking Shiite regime, may find a future in the AEU. It’s a matter of goodwill and thinking beyond all prejudices. At the time of Ma’moon, all scientists irrespective of their ethnicities found a seat at the big table in Baghdad. That spirit must be awakened. This is something that must be awakened locally and not play a second fidel to the importation of science from the West. Talented people, Indians, Iranians, Pakistanis and from all Arab countries should get together in the AEU. Right now they are attracted to NASA and defence industries in the United States and other western countries. The spillover will be to create cooperation which will bring in peace and prosperity replacing the present despondency. Muslims will start winning Nobel Prizes and soon the retro grades will crawl back to their caves where they belong.
Who knew I would sit and watch the whole thing! Great work on your presentation! Wow! So motivational. So with the discovery of gravitational wave what are we going to use this discovery for? I don’t know! I love it! Thank you
Why doesn't anyone talk about the interviewer at the end? He did a fantastic job, was a great conversationalist, and. got some great answers out of our personal astrophysicist, NDT. Best wishes to the UAE from the USA! 🙌🏽
I am old enough to have used a rotary phone. I was amazed that you could make a phone call with a battery powered bag. I couldn't conceive how I could actively type to someone across the globe. I remember Pong and Atari being cutting edge. I now have all of these wonders in my pocket on one device and I'm only 40!!!!!!
I remember the first "Cell phone" I ever saw. It looked like a brick, you could have clubbed someone unconscious with it.... I also remember the smallest cell phone I ever saw. Only had one button, phones got bigger again after that...
By 2040, VR will have graphics, physics, controls and haptics so good that you will be able to see, hear, feel and interact with perfect-looking big boobed catgirls all you want (at least from hardware side, not sure about software, there may be a few years lag). Just look at PS2 ---> PS5 progress in just 20 years.
For years I have been lamenting the lack of Jetson-style air cars. Now I have something new to lament the lack of! Truly a treasure for chronic lamenters :)
Yup heard it before were not goining anyway buddy we dont shuttles we have a olx junk space station we dont have any knew tecknolovy for propulsion since 1945 v2 rockets a mars trip is a lie radiation and solarflares would kill us we dont belong in space except in.star trek and star wars movies. Phd who cares were are we today hubble and robots is all we have were not ever going fo alpha centurai 70000 yr voyage
Only phd hollywood false science we dont belong in space star trek and starwars is false science radiation and v2 rockets from1945 is all we have and a junk space station thank god for hubble and robots to the planets
@@martinzitter4551 Let him be. Musk has made the only real advancements in heavy lift capacity and re-usability, something Tyson also doubted they could do.
@@martinzitter4551 To his credit, Tyson has stated several times in his radio show startalk that he was wrong about private enterprise being able / willing to fund the research needed to make colonies on the moon and mars possible. Gotta give him credit, he was proven wrong, and admitted it freely, and does now openly support spaceX.
"we are running out of time"!! The moderator is self branding, not giving space to the audience and trying to restrict a giant communicator. Thanks to Neil who saved the day!
@@uzefulvideos3440 "Traveling to mars is absurdly expensive".That's the same reductionist arguement that kept people from exploring new boundaries.The cost for a ticket on a plane used to cost almost 100 grand.Now you can buy a plane ticket for less than 500 dollars.Space travel will continue to decrease the cost to epace travel.He has already slashed the cost to space by 80%.His next starlink venture is expected to give him more than twice the usable capital of nasa.Not just that but his new ticket and spaceship pair are expected to slash the cost to space by another 70%.Even then SpaceX will now be sending colonists to mars for free.They will monetize it.He has said that the cost for a ticket to mars will be from 100-200 grand.Mars trips will happen one way or another.The birth of a new society will irreversibly be brought about.
@==/A\== Wrong ! Humans will be on Mars in the next 6 years, and that fact doesn't depend on the Moon base. NASA can do the job of building a base on the Moon, but private companies (Elon Musk) will send humans to Mars, even if that group of people die on the surface of Mars. If a group of 3 human beings land on Mars in 2025., you can be sure that another group of people will be send on Mars in the year 2026., and arrive on Mars in 2027. The laws of physics are not against our exploration of Mars with our own hands, legs and eyes. We can create both of a bases in the same time ; one on Mars, and one on the Moon. Just be patient and wait for 5 years. In 2024. humans will start a long distance journey, and in 2025 J will see you in these comment section.
@==/A\== Why are people saying they are going to Mars , they have not been to the Moon yet , and Neil deGrasse Tyson know's that . Going to Mars is NOT going to happen in 2024 , it is going to be more like 2080 .... So you Are right .
Its funny cause private enterprise and interested laymen were making rockets for a long time before governments got involved and decided to ban and regulate the hell out of getting to space. Forcing people to get government permission first, setting up massive hurddles, making it extremely expensive to get into business. So even starting a small business for fun and building it to see where it goes is pointless. Moon express spent 20 million campaigning congress just for permission to get to the moon. And Tyson doesnt even realise the billions which is spent with zero return and zero chance of return by private individuals and businesses. People will do it out of love, out of interest, out of chance, cause they love to gamble, and out of charity. And way more is spent on voluntary research than governments spend. So yeah profit doesnt drive everything
Private Enterprise is riding along on the coat tails of a huge amount of public spending - at least from the massive amount of data they have had to learn from and then from all the defense and NASA contracts they have got and then all the people they could employ whose experience was developed at public expense.
well he himself is human so yeah but I think in some of the podcast or talk that he did, he said and I paraphrase that he regret saying those words cause SpaceX advance so quickly that he couldn't predict their growth.
@@joewilliekingdom no one can expect technological progression that quick.. if we turn back tie 15 years and I ask you 'do you think we able to make reusable rocket booster like airplanes or cars?' you would definitely answer no he is intelligent in astrophysics but in technological progression, I don't think anyone is.
@@joewilliekingdom if you can do better go out and do it. Bring something of value, add to the subject, make the improvements you want to see rather than glorify the mistakes of others who dared to try.
@@bengrizzlyadams6187 i respect that sentiment. i really do. but when i think about the future, i see both planets and humans as merely an intermediate step, towards something far beyond our limited understanding.
@@bengrizzlyadams6187 currently, yes. but a kardashev type I civilization would be able to change that. and a type II would even be able to juggle with whole planets. in the end it's just a matter of how much energy you have at your disposal. and of course whether or not your civilization will be able to harness all the energy without destroying itself ;) i recommend isaac arthurs videos for more information on this.
He's not a good person. He hates you. He hates all people. He's bitter because they don't want what he wants and he has become a multi-millionaire in the process. If it came down to saving a starving child or getting a new star named after himself, that would be one very dead child. His selfishness is just different than most others.
That was a great inspirational speech by Neil deGrasse Tyson. Two years and a couple of months later, UAE (of all countries!) launch their first Mars mission. So, Neil, you've accomplished your mission to inspire at least one Government to fund some serious Space-related research and to motivate a whole new generation of young people to pursue a career in STEM. Well done, indeed. As to the second motivator... war and competition: China's also just launched new Mars mission will hopefully act as a new Sputnik moment, and push the US to intensify its own Space program... even if, as Neil pointed it out by citing JFK, it would be for all the wrong reasons. If the only beneficial thing to come out of the current anti-China sentiment in the US were to motivate Trump to pledge to put Americans on Mars by the end of this decade, it would still prove Neil right.
I'm very proud of the UAE for their space program, especially having a brilliant woman scientist in an important role. Space exploration can save the world in many ways.
You are confused. Read the New Testament very carefully then you will know the truth. While your at it read the the Old Testament very carefully too! Obviously you will know the truth the day you take your last breath when your face to face with your creator. This man might know how to talk but he sure ain’t smarter than God. The only fish bowl there is, is the one God is looking at and asking the question “Haven’t they learned anything “
Clare Degroff, imagine how those 50,000 people going to feel when they find out it was all a scam on mankind. It was all a lie, search for the TRUTHS and you will find it. Don't be the sheep!!! 50 million dollars plus a day and name just ONE THING MANKIND GOT IN RETURN? WE GOT STORIES AND PICTURES!!! THAT IS ALL. Please do tell how the SPACE STATION GOT TO GO 17,500 MPH ? It has NO ROCKETS. ITS ALL A SHOW. A SCAM ON MANKIND!!!
Could save a lot of time and resources by taking an asteroid that was mined for some material and doing it so that it digs out a huge Intersteller Mother Ship to set sail on the electromagnetic waves from the planets and the galaxy itself. Propelling the asteroid spaceship to any point in the galaxy...in time...
@@oldnotweak with the awkward assumption that you're not joking, space force has nothing to do with space technology or exploration. It has the goal of militarizing space. The administration has been attempting to reduce NASA's budget.
@@jarodstrain8905 and NASA has been next to useless in recent years, private companies are outdoing it every day. NASA doesn't deserve a penny anymore. the space force will be what NASA was 50 years ago. and if you think military doesn't push innovation then you have missed thousands of years of human history
@@oldnotweak you comical little fellow. Private companies are building on what NASA began. Private companies do what they do for the sake of attempting to make profit. Without NASA's mention of Science and exploration how much do you think those private companies would have done? It took nearly 50 years after men walked on the moon before the first private company for space even existed. If you think NASA doesn't do anything - all you're demonstrating is that you don't know anything about NASA.
23:50 - "You might say, private enterprises will go to Mars. NO! Let me repeat that. NO! I'm just a realist about this." Elon Musk: hold my unrealistic rockets
Private enterprise will never go to Mars, unless theres enough profit to be made. Theres no profit to be made and the costs are prohibitive. At the moment.
@@sagarah8217 That's what Starlink is for. Musk has stated that they'll use profits from Starlink to fund Starship development. At the same time SpaceX is not publicly traded and Elon Musk has controlling interest so there's no chance of investors/share holders changing the plan.
I think they done pretty well in envisioning the future. You can now travel by sea and without getting off the boat travel by land to your next destination. We do spend time on top of the water using customized skiing equipment, water boards... We also have single person flight machines, hang gliders and more...
I do understand you, but being objective and definitive.. those aren't to the extent that these predictions had been envisioned or predicted.. Sure, these are subsets but they are not to the extent that were exaggeratingly, predicted. But i do get you.
I actually thought of that too. Ultra-wealthy billionaires are the modern day royalty. Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk are spending huge amounts of money on their respective space companies. They are also doing things for a fraction of the cost of a traditional NASA program.
@@markdavis160 Yeah, one of the problems is that sometimes the motivation to do something effectively and the motivation to create and keep jobs clash horribly. NASA is spending big money to develop new DISPOSABLE rockets, and theyre not even cheap. It goes against all reason to develop disposable ones and dump them in the ocean rather than make reusable ones. UNLESS its a bloody farce to keep jobs. Which it is. The whole idea of "jobs" as a commodity is problematic. When your priority is creating jobs, it automatically means youre gonna be wasting resources. This is one argument that would potentially favour the idea of a universal income. Why go through all of the drama to create meaningless unproductive jobs when everyone including the one on the job knows its nonsense, and them give those people wages? It seems much simpler to just give them some money right away. Imagine the amount of bureaucracy that would cut down. But thats still the same problem. Bureaucrats are gonna lose jobs in that case.
@@Likexner Well you would still need to give money to people who haven't produced anything to acquire it with universal income and you need productive jobs to generate money in the first place so you can fund universal income which would make it just a redistribution scheme. The word universal is a misnomer since the people from which the income would be taxed to be given to the rest would be getting less money(universal income - their personal taxes) for many it would mean they get negative universal income(which doesn't make it an income) and for others positive so the whole idea of 'universal income' is flawed it's just the new buzz word for tax increase or deficit spending. If the goal of UBI is getting people out of poverty and the most sustainable way to stay out of poverty is to become productively useful in society so you can get a satisfactory income it would seem better to make people more productive i.e skills, education, build character thus provide free universal skill/education but that wouldn't sell like giving people free money.
@@geraldg350 The real force behind universal income is manipulation (the tool of the weak), in order to give one's weak self a sense of superiority over others. Their view of poverty is wrong*, and their noble intent is a sham. A giving B's money to C is not about C, it is all about A. UBI will not have the desired intent as long as humans remain universally clueless. The poor, not knowing how to handle money, will blow it on gambling and booze (or worse). It is similar to how science and engineering are progressing blindly, i.e. given continued universal human cluelessness, they are creating all of this science and engineering so a future stupid, clueless human can wield it (I emphasize 'clueless', but 'stupid' applies, and it drives home the point better).
@Mark Smileer You are 100 % correct. I didnt click the link. Yes NDT is a piece of junk. I have also been saying creator and also talking a out the moon. Its out b4 dark here. Then it goes down and a full moon comes out... I know something is not right at all. Get back to me Thanks Friend.
@God of the Eternal light. Not fiar to lump all liberals together, but I agree Odog Gow = idiot, like the feminist comment. So dumb. I feel like someone deleted their comments but I see his replies. Its funny he said you have brain rot when Odog said the dumbest thing here.
It's either go somewhere else eventually or stay here and fight each other over resources and or petty BS forever. I used to feel like we all could just get along but certain entities keep driving that notion away. We would drastically have to reduce our numbers amongst a lot of other things
@@anthemgunaether2914 The fact that you are eating food that somebody worthwhile isn't receiving is the only thing about you that troubles me, flattard. The best thing you can do is become an organ donor. Soon.
Thank you! I see so many other Americans laughing at India for their efforts and wishing and hoping they fail. But me personally I am loving every moment of what they are doing because I don't see it as us against them. I think innovation and advancement for any one country regardless of who it is, is a win for the science community as a whole. If you're selfish look at it this way. every dollar they spend figuring things out is a dollar you don't have to spend to figure it out. Save the patriotism and competitive nature for later and try to see the bigger picture at hand here.
Lakario Davis very well said good Sir. Many countries loves to bully other countries for the lack of progress in the same field. But like you said in the end it will only benefit us all. It takes failure to make perfect. And even though America is the most advance country when it comes to spacefaring, then who is not to say America can’t learn something from others and vise versa. If more and more countries begin to research in space, then I think that is a great thing... Heck I wish that all countries would unite and work together for the greater good. I think spacefaring would advance super fast then. That will never happen though but one can always dream right. Anyway super good post you made. Oh and sorry for my bad English, I’m from Denmark 🇩🇰 😅
Maybe India should worry about resolving the epedemic of poverty and the corruption that causes it before they try to develop a space program. I mean what's the point of putting hundreds of millions of rupees into trying to get into space when some entitled high caste head wobbler is just going to steal 90% of the budget in baksheesh?
i dont see how America is competing with the indian space program. and i have never heard of any Americans wanting our space program to fail. . i have utmost respect for the guys at ISRO, they do incredible things while being basically broke. the problem really with india is that its huge and poor. and in my personal opinion democracy is not working very well here, especially for a country of 1.3 billion people all from diverse cultures. politicians here are corrupt most just care for getting votes by swaying less-educated populations (what is referred to as 'vote bank' ) so really here in india we just need an actual competent government (perhaps even non-democratic) to create sensible long term policies to grow our economy (which is really just too small for its size - 3Tr for 1.3B people). we do need to invest more in science and technology and stimulate our industry for economic growth. but without strong government backing, it seems unlikely.
@@Noises They can do both at the same time. It is not 'do one thing or the other'. Besides, humans are still universally clueless, so the problem is not economic or social or political or even psychological, the problem is philosophical (humans have never had a good one). Enter me. Read my philosophy, or go to your grave clueless, your choice.
To be honest I believe it is highly important that young children should be focused on learning about Space and Mars as well as learning how to create ideas and innovation.
Ron! I want to be fair and understand your point, but I must be too stupid to get it. I suspect you want to point to a contradiction. One solution would be to add the time stamps to each of your references and the second, to explain "wildly underestimate pace of future advancements" versus "super conservative estimates about ... exploration". To me that's not a contradiction, it is rather a confirmation of the intro by the later? Am I wrong?
@@curtcoller3632 i agree with everything and idk if youre wrong or not but for whatever reason, i think he was trying to bring attention to Neil saying they under estimated science and at a different time they over estimated it. I think Ron missed the point of why that was contrasted, either that or hes just being a goof
@Mark Smileer Ever heard of Agricola Tumefacens? Because I am starting to believe that genetic best achievement was to induce cancer in as many people as they could.
The most beautiful sentence in this entire video:
"We went to explore moon, but founded Earth 🌍" and hence we realised how valuable it is. Celebrating Earth day. 👍🏼
Oh so true...
and yet all the big bois do it scrape earth dry while lying to the public and profiting.. Earth day is a scam
and not admitting we didn't go to the moon...
@@Maradnus Spinning ball earth is a scam and the biggest lie of them all.
@@sportsfix6975 Lol, you believe in the moon.
NDT: "Today Royalty is not as powerful over nations as it was two hundred years ago"
UAE: *nervous shuffling*
bone saws intensify
Not sure if he thought that one through, in his context it makes sense. But to them.... he may have got himself hung
Exactly what I thought!
Very good point. I missed that I guess because at the time he said it, I did not realize WHERE he was!
Oil outranks royalty in today's middle east.
Neil could talk about his kitchen counters, and I would still listen for an hour.
Me to, till he starts talking stupid! Same as with Elon Musk!
And sadly, there are millions more just like you.
Which subject matter do you consider stupid?
@@nacypher
It's not the subject matter, it's the babble.
Ahh ok
Dr Tyson's breakdown of complex concepts is nothing short of sensational
Thanks Neil. You are to me the most interesting scientific narrator since Carl Sagan. He’d be proud of you.
Most interesting.....ever...
Carl Sagan…thank fuck he never met Meghan Markle.
I am aware this is old news that I some how missed. I would like to say I support this. I am ok with my taxes helping to fund the space programs. I truly believe that this should be a world effort. Backed by all countries and completed together. Us, the, people of earth, together, WE did this.
You are ok with your taxes going to this? Cool. Now here is the more important question. Are you ok for other people to be forced by threat of imprisonment to pay taxes towards this?
@@chrischandler889 Not at all. No one should be threatened. However, there should be an option on our tax forms to donate whatever you feel. Families living under poverty should also be exempt.
@@supercoolstephanie yep. Taxation is theft. We all should be promoting a voluntary/consensual society.
@@chrischandler889 that would be wonderful in a perfect world. Unfortunately, most wouldn't give anything. I wish things were different. All we can do is vote for the best option.
@@supercoolstephanie there is no best option. Also of people don't pay then they don't receive. So many would pay.
My dad had a co-worker who was somewhat older than he, who loved to tell a story about Sputnik. While his physics teacher was in the middle of a lecture about how aerodynamics and the limitations of chemical energy made it impossible to put an artificial satellite in orbit someone came to the classroom to tell them about Sputnik 1.
Interesting.
Sputnik was launched at night in Russia and Europe (around 10pm in France), and was first detected by radio-observers a couple hours later in the middle of the night in the USA, most people woke up to the news.
I'd be curious to know who was holding physics classes in the AM hours.
@@LiberalsGettheBulletToo I mean, my Physics 1, 2, and 3 were held at 9am, 8am, and 9am respectively.
@@LiberalsGettheBulletToo I'd be more curious to know which lecturers are up in the AM hours waiting for news from Europe when they have a lecture the next day. Sputnik was launched in 1957, quite a few decades before 24 hour news was a thing. Time Magazine wrote a week later how the news broke in the US. At a cocktail party for the International Year of Geophysics attended by 50 scientists from 13 nations in the Russian Embassy on 16th st in Washington, New York Times Reporter Walter Sullivan was called away from the party to take an urgent phone call from his paper breaking the news to him that evening, 2 hours after the final news broadcast for the night, where he in turn relayed the news to Lloyd Berkner, a physicist who was at the time the president of the Comité Spéciale de l’Année Géophysique Internationale, who then announced the news to the guests, congratulating his Soviet peers on their achievement. This tells us the NYT heard the news that night, which means it would have made the press the following morning. Morning TV news wasn't really a thing so your assertion "most people in the US woke up to the news" makes no sense whatsoever. The first public reports came out on radio the morning after, it's not at all inconceivable that people would interrupt a physics lecture to break such important scientific news. Indeed, most Americans would have found out either reading a morning paper or that evening on TV. And Americans were never exactly famous for their love of reading as I'm sure you would know. Oh and nice user name, really sets the tone for anyone making an estimation of your intellectual capacity. Hope you made it through all the big words and facts, Cleetus. I know how you alt right wingnuts hate both of those things.
Liberals Get the Bullet Too nobody said a time the story took place. It could have been days later!
Before Sputnik my physics teacher in grade 9 told our class that in order to go into space and arrive at the desired target they would have to aim with precision because you can't steer in space. I immediately told him he was wrong because of a simple and basic physics law. EVERY ACTION HAS AND EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION. Later that year our geometry teacher told us that he and all the other students had worked all day on a problem that nobody was able to solve. Our class was the last one of the day. I answered it correctly in less than a minute. I was absent more days than present and still passed all my exams. I was too bored to keep going and quit school with a high school diploma. Now as I look back I wish I had gone one to become an engineer.
When the man says "This is when we discovered Earth", it is epic. From that moment on, every one should listen to this man. NEIL will be remembered for centuries, with this sentence. This will be his famous quote for the mankinkind.
No matter what a person thinks of Mr. Tyson you have to give that he's very passionate. And I believe we need more people like him in the fields of science and research. People who not only share this drive and passion but who will push forward to educate others and share the passion.
Indeed, if we ever become free from the goals of profit and infiltration of greed. Science will take its rightful place. Unfortunately, with the politics of debasement in play, this will be very difficult. as a man of science myself I remain hopeful my species will see it for what it is. More truth and less magical....
Passion doesn’t make you right, I’m sure that lunatic Hitler was passionate.
@@markmiller6402 Science is objective, he can be a lunatic and still be right about Astrophysics.
@mr Tyson.
@@markmiller6402 Haha, nearly my comment as well.
1:12:55 "Innovation in today's technology drives tomorrow economy". Why does Neil have such a way with words? I love it!
1:13:+ .... ''received goods of others''... Emirates can afford research but easier just buying from others what they don't really need. Wonder if the compare/ministers felt that Freudian SLAP
Big bullshit David g.
Because he's a well rehearsed showman.
"People will spend almost any amount of money to not die" - Neil deGrasse Tyson 2018
And how much money will we spend (sacrifice) to reduce a 0.3-percent chance of dying?
@@LlamaOccident So you're suggesting that there's a limit to the amount of money you'd be willing to part with, even if it were absolutely necessary to ensure your own survival? Suicide is extremely anomalous behavior, the _overwhelming_ majority of individuals would prefer poverty over death.
Your youtube comment history strongly suggests that you're here because you get off on posting anything contradictory, even if it's total nonsense. You're clearly an idiot.
That's such a moronic thing to say, seeing how many people kill themselves.
@@phxgen I was just saying that some people's obsession with death is a symptom of their neurotic hypochondriac personality type which is an ANOMALOUS minority. So his statement should have been "some people will do anything to prevent dying" which takes some of the kick out of the phrase and makes it somewhat meaningless as you kind find some people willing to go to great lengths to do just about anything. Only an ANOMALOUS minority of people are obsessed with death and among those some are eager for death (self-destructive) while others are obsessed with warding it away (neurotic hypochondriac). It's nice to see that the pedantic wordplay enthusiast fedora species is still alive and well on the internet as it's always so interesting to encounter their bizarre self-invented rules of logic. Why does a small minority of people being suicidal somehow stop mattering because it's anomalous? Do the behaviours of rich people not matter because there are only a few of them? The biggest psychological type isn't even a majority of people, only a plurality. I just love people who argue through ad hominem attacks, convoluted wordplay, and the illusion of statistics without actually stating them (saying the rate of self-destructive behaviors is vaguely ANOMALOUS without giving anything close to any kind of percentage). Self-destructiveness is a common trait to human nature, just look at diet and addictions for evidence of that. Look up Freud's concept of the death drive and contemplate how supposedly life hungry human beings could vigorously leap into two world wars that killed over a hundred million people.
@@LlamaOccident "I was just saying that some people's obsession with death is a symptom of their neurotic hypochondriac personality type which is an ANOMALOUS minority."
Oh hell, how incredibly daft of me. What you meant is so obvious now. How on earth did I initially fail to extrapolate that whole novella from this single sentence? "That's such a moronic thing to say, seeing how many people kill themselves."
"So his statement should have been "some people will do anything to prevent dying" which takes some of the kick out of the phrase and makes it somewhat meaningless..."
The original "people will spend almost any amount of money to not die" is every bit as vague, kick-free, and meaningless. Not "all people," or even "most people," just "people." Not "any amount of money," just "almost any amount of money." The only thing I find more befuddling about this thread than anyone considering the NDT version to be something deep or meaningful, is you considering it important enough to hammer out a giant paragraph explaining why he should have instead said something so equally drab.
"...the illusion of statistics without actually stating them..."
Oh I know, right?!? Fucking people.
So uhhh, how many people kill themselves?
"Why does a small minority of people being suicidal stop mattering because it's anomalous? Do the behaviors of rich people not matter because there are only a few of them?"
Where the fuck did I or anyone in this thread say anything at all like tha-
Oh, wait. I think I did use the word "anomalous," didn't I? Of course, it's only natural to assume that was me implying that suicide doesn't matter. Everybody should kill themselves. Or nobody should. Whatever, I don't give a FUCK! Further, I think rich people should be allowed to... no, _compelled_ to eat toddlers. Live ones, feet first! Man, some of us sure are good at accurately inferring a whoooole lot from very, very little these days. Totally reasonable to extrapolate "all self-destructive behavior" from my use of the word "suicide" as well. I guess I need to be a lot more careful with my words. Damn my rotten old brain, always forgetting which individual characters betray all of my elaborate and morally repugnant convictions!
Seriously though, did I say "anomalous?" I wonder if I said "anomalous."
"...pedantic..."
Haha.
"...convoluted wordplay..."
HAHA.
Your RUclips comment history continues to suggest that you get off on being contradictory. I no longer think that you're clearly an idiot though, I apologize for that. Whatever you are, it's something far more esoteric. Probably just existing on a level several bong-rips above mine.
Even with about an hour 20 minutes his speaking of science keeps your attention. He talks in a way that common people can understand and dream.
I just wonder why such a "smart guy" once said: : "We are just stardust, forget Jesus Christ"...
@@lucasm8016 I used to think he was a cool guy, but then I started to pay attention to what he says and what he backs. And now the World Government Summit, and Davos/WEF? F^%k off Globalists and the stupid sheep who drink your Kool-Aid in the name of "Science" and "Eco-ism." Its just 21st century fascism and I ain't biting.
actually....tyson has a good clown act with chuck nice!
Because even if god created the universe Jesus being on earth 2000 years ago means nothing in the timeline of our universe. Or even greatly misrepresented. The dude told us to love eachother and not kill or judge one another. ( pretty simple values to live by) and we killed him. Could you imagine the advances we would have if we weren’t fighting eachother over pretend borders? Imagine a human symbiosis of intelligence and values. To not kill eachother but to build eachother
I'm planning to study astrophysics and possibly try to become an astronaut with the PhD. Watching the progress SpaceX has made is amazing. Watching the rockets come back down and land on literal DRONE SHIPS is absolutely amazing and gives me hope for the future of space travel.
Just don’t give up my man, you can pull it off 💯💪🏾✊🏾🙏🏾
Whatever floats your boat, although even if that was economically viable, id still wouldn't see how it out now impressive than moon landing or pioneer probes, etc. You know, great things people have done decades ago, not moderately interesting things people are doing today and claiming that it will be great later, but not making any sense.
I would offer having consulted with JPL, NASA, then SpaceX and non-government entities...there is a considerable, unspoken nearly unquestioning 'Religion' with regards to the purpose and methods of approach to humanity in space.
JPL and NASA are about science and research which requires a specific methodical approach. Discovery and Engineering of the private sector is very different....and they can drive each other insane. JPL & NASA focus on the perfect methods and methodical implementation - private sector focus is on the most effective, efficient...decisive implementation.
Elon launches rockets knowing they will fail - learning in the process. NASA will can't take risks or waste tax-payers money, so it has to be perfect and planned. They can't include failure, it's not on the table.
@Bobb Grimley Gtfoh, who the hell are you to shit on someone else’s dreams, clearly your life sucks ass, ya gotta small one and mad at the world about it, or live in your moms basement 😂
@Bobb Grimley dweebs😂🤣🤡 stop hating on people dreams and aspiration’s 🤡
Host: "we are running out of time"
Neil: goes on a 15 min. rant
Host: "and there you have it ladies and gentlemen"
Neil: "waitwaitwait just 1 question i promise i'l give a quick answer!"
Host: "k"
Neil: gives a 6 min. answer
Host: -_-
I wouldn't mind if he kept on talking until the heat death of the universe.
So that proves "time is relative".
That is what everyone does who is passionate about their work. Ask any old auto mechanic what ails your car by just talking to him. He will elaborate for several minutes about the many possibilities and then remind you in the end, " I could get it running right away but please realize that your vehicle, at its age, is about to have many more problems. The water pump will be going within a year, the alternator has only so much more time, etc. All cars started falling apart the day they were bought."
drakeequation521 basically what your saying is....listen to the guy that sounds like he knows what he’s talking about, because I can’t be arsed finding out what he’s talking about!, I’ll just take a “professionals” point of view because he’s called a professional by people I’ll never know meet or collaborate with EVER!
Your opinion means nothing to anyone that can think for themselves........nXt breath good luck with life!f8L
Ps logical fallacy = appeal to authority (look it up x)
1. Predicting the future is futile.
2. Predict the future.
He just has to promote future investments but he's making that promotion sound like "rational thoughts".
Then UN IPCC:
ruclips.net/video/d0Z5FdwWw_c/видео.html
and Greta...
Yeah, I'm all up for sending Greta on a one way ticket to Mars :)
@@freezatron what a great thought about one of our fellow human beings. War criminals can be friends nowadays, but someone speaking some words can go to hell. What a world we live in, why are the likes of you thinking like this? It's a shame. It's a sad, sad world we live in.
Greta will stay on Earth collecting Basic.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson is my favourite scientist. He explains energetically, easy to understand, funny way. i very much like to listen to his lectures. thank you.
He is a complete douche. Full narcissist that controls every discussion down to the simple topics he have repeated in from other real scientists. If you're not humble as a scientist, how the h-ll are you going to accept the details that you should be looking for. He only wants to rant in front of people and play intelligent hero. I know he's not as smart hes trying to act. For some, it's very obvious.
@@bumblebob5979 But you still watch his content? Strange indeed.....
@@SMHman666 Pops up in the feed, I check about half and get the same impressions as before. Types some comments to his immature groupies and happens to offend a bunch of youngsters cheering over his big brains. And you clearly couldnt hold the tears back. Im sorry.
@@bumblebob5979 Lol, I wonder why there is only garbage in your feed.
@@Bradley_UA More salt pls :P
Damn his charisma is over the top, Neil is gold
Fool's gold.
I rather listen one hour of Neil deGrasse Tyson then have 6 hours a romantic interlude with my wife or super model.
Mark Smileer your wrong in that your post is Way to long
@@ferrumequus88 I feel sorry for your wife
@@c.l.888 Ha ha 😂😂😂 you dont know my wife...😂😂
His anology of Einstein and Lazer 40 years later...that's truly amazing.
This is a scammer a religious man his religious teaching are based on the same shit other religions are based on faith and doctrine meaning you have to believe it so hard that if anyone says it’s bullshit you get offended doctrine cuz anything outside of this fantasy is ludacris
@@tg622 TY, Tyson is a disgusting puppet like our sh!tty Prez.
So glad he brought up the Apollo 8 image ‘Earthrise’ as significant to our perception of Earth.
A fantastic, enlightening presentation. I loved the way you moved from the past to the future effortlessly and steered clear of politics, yet embraced the subject as a reality too. Your summary at the end was perfect, let the different branches of science work together to discover more. Thank you so much for the reality. 🙏
Neil's explanation of why you do these things, the unknown long term benefits, is the most important reason to do R&D on the scale that we in the US tend to stay away from these days. This research in the past on the scales it used to be on is what made the US great. That we stopped doing these things on those scales is a major reason we are in decline.
Why did america legalize weed?
@@nikhilprem7998 It's still federally illegal.
Tyson is not a genius. He is a manipulative weasel. Here are the facts. WHY E=MC2 IS NECESSARILY AND CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE:
Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. C4 is the proof of the fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. This explains the fourth dimension. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity.) The EARTH/ground AND what is THE SUN are CLEARLY (on balance) E=MC2 AS F=ma. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! (Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.) The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. Great !!! This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.
By Frank DiMeglio
@@frankdimeglio8216 Where did you learn about Physics?
@@dberry999666 Why would anyone think Neil deGrasse Tyson is a Carl Sagan?
Neil is a communicator first who has spent his life learning about science.
Carl was a Scientist who did lots of research and learned how to communicate that.
Both people and both skills are very important to Scientific discovery. If you cannot communicate what has been learned, what is theorized, what is considered fairly solid and why then other cannot learn from and build upon (or disprove) those thoughts.
As to for NASA, no straight answer, his job is his job. You might notice that almost all managers at that level provide squishy answers to most things. That is their job. Not that I like that, but I get it. To change that, we have to change how things are funded, how challenges are viewed and how short sighted most people are.
What a delight to hear a person who is erudite and entertaining at the same time. Very rare.
franci.......entertainment belongs in a nightclub NOT in a scientist"s lab!
4th reason why big projects are undertaken: Elon Musk wants to do it.
He probably found some of those Colliers Magazines in his father’s bookshelf.
Elon Musk is building rockets because he sees economic opportunities. It is noteworthy that he is currently making over a billion dollars per year in sales of his rockets (gross profits here, not net). His satellite project is definitely all about the money.
@@GlanderBrondurg Elon was just asked recently about if he wants to send people to Mars because of the threat of global warming and he said no, it was the idea of doing what hasn't been done. It was about exploring space and because it's cool. I There won't be any money out of going to Mars for decades and maybe never or at least many many decades.
I dont know. Mr Tyson saus theres no evidence of ufos and yet we now have us navy tactical data of solud controled vehocles that defy what we know of the laws of physics. The capitalist system is now failibg and totally manipulated. Climate wise weve had a ten year warning from the most conservatice climate scientists and yet were continuing to increase total co2 emmisions globally. So maybe the profit motive is less relavent that the dobt have all your eggs in one basket.. Anyway just saying.
Our tech is way ahead of columbus. We can send robots ahead of manned missions to produce air and fuel.
This is so fascinating. Watching it in 2022. The message of the why we explore n how technology advance is delivery perfectly.
Agreed - it’s now 2023….
One of the best practical session I've ever seen. Thank you.
I just love Neil's passion and presentation of the subject. Always a pleasure to watch.
NEIL WATCHED & UNDERSTOOD STAR WARS!!!!
We got COMPLACENT!!!
Americans forgot who they once were because they gave in to their base tendencies.
No, Trump DIDN'T win a Nobel because he didn't EARN one, unlike BO who got one he DIDN'T earn.
We once HAD that foresight, we don't any more..
@Neil deGrasse Tyson
I can Watch you all day long, and I just loved this talk.
thanks for sharing.
i can only last of few minutes of this clown
He is one of my biggest heroes. He is so inspirational and entertaining. I love watching his talks, you can tell he really loves his job.
I studied physics and astronomy in college in the '70's and I have watched dozens of Mr. Tyson's videos. I'm impressed with Mr. Tyson and his passion and energy traveling around the world educating people about astrophysics and science in general. I don't remember disagreeing with him about anything. I hate reading negative comments people posted. The world needs more scientists like Tyson.
I'm a little suspicious of his motivation when he marginalizes people who don't agree with his verbal Diarrhea...
@@TheRoguelement I agree. His behavior is of a bully and a self righteous zealot. All his examples from the historical is also stupid. So simple and self serving. I was actually waiting for his point but there was non.
Yeah, people who like government and not people will agree with you. He said that individuals will never do an Elon Musk and then totally turn the argument up side down. His arguments are not with honesty or for purpose of educating in mind. He seems very agenda driven. I could be wrong, I don’t know the guy personally but what I see on that what comes out on medias to be to self serving and contradictory to truth to give him a pass on liability.
Well, we aren't allowed to disagree with Mr. "black science man" now are we?
He's not so much a scientist as a science communicator. He is very negative and hostile to people of faith and that hurts the advancement of humanity overall. Also, he is a bit nieve about how dangerous some countries have shown themselves to be to a free society. But hey, nobody is perfect.
The most profound talk I have ever observed since my 40+ years on this pale blue planet. Neil has a way of extrapolating complex subjects into consumable and digestible knowledge. Nowhere else you will find this. So much so I can’t miss an episode of Star Talk. I’m not even in the field of Astrophysics. Nowhere close, but the knowledge attained from Neil aid me in my VR R&D projects. Two words. Knowledge Transfer. Take a sun of its parts to further advance what it is you are doing around STEM.
@Mr Humblepie yeah, kinda like Neil. But actually smart people are Richard Feynman, I'd say.
He's my number one pick to have a dinner with. I'd be like please pass the wine and he'd just start up and go..............four hours later he might stop talking and I would be disappointed if he did.
Milton Friedman.
Thomas Sowell.
They will blow you out of the water if you think this is good.
6⁶
VR and astrophysics seem like a logical mix actually
I just love neil degras tyson's enthusiasm for teaching. It's so inspiring it makes me want to get another masters degree.
Did you end up getting that started?
teaching......inspiration.......wow!! BUT.......IT"S ALL THEORY AND WISHFUL THINKING!!!!!!!!
Hands down one of the best lectures I ever listened to.
Outstanding presentation thank you very much.The last 10 minutes brought it home.
I was cooking dinner watching a RUclips videos and I have auto play on. I'm damn glad I did. This has nothing to do with the subject video I was watching but I'm glad it played. What a great listen/watch. Mr Tysons owned this conference.
Ofcourse he owned it , he was the only one talking
This is the second time I have watched this, my only hope is enough world leaders take on board and implement the massively important points he made, Neil is awesome, if I were to develop a man-crush, it would be him no doubt about it.
Yeah he is totally wrong or lying willingly, either or, nobody is going anywhere and not because of lockdown.
@@bengrizzlyadams6187 ????? When did he say anything about "lockdown"?
Yes, Tyson is incredible! I've heard people say that he hasn't personally discovered anything significant, yet, while that may be true, what he HAS done is to make science, technology, indeed the very ACT of discovery itself accessible, understandable, even DESIRABLE to entire generations of people, young and old, world-wide! To me, that is more important and valuable than ANY specific discovery or innovation! Cheers to you, Neil!
@@flurng Incredible is the word, you nailed it. I don't believe 1 word he says.
@@flurng Nobody is going to space, it's a lie. Nobody ever never went to the moon, it's all special effects, drawings and CGIs, the ISS is a Sesame Street format for kids' indoctrination into the biggest lie of all.
As someone from the 3rd. World, I and most people I know, always knew that the spacial race is drive by:
1. Obtain military superiority (to impose your interests over others)
2. Dominante the communications sector, because it is strategic to maintain a dominante position and because it means big money.
3. Propaganda: demostrarte who is more powerful, have a better future and should be followed.
Of course, working on the spacial sector there are people that "loves" the knowledge and thinks that the sector is essential for the future of human kind. But that is not the people that takes the big decitions (involving big money and resources). The people that takes the decitions are the very powerful and very rich that are interested in increasing their power and richness and not in the future of of human kind. Common people in central countries are completely obnubilated by the propaganda and may feel some surprise in hearing conferences like this.
We need more teachers like Neil deGrass Tyson with such passion and knowledge.
I’m a former Mormon. Just before humans went to the moon, I read in a Mormon priesthood manual that Mormon prophet Joseph F. Smith (or Joseph Fielding Smith, I forget) said that humans would never go to the moon because humans were meant by god to live only on earth.
Joseph Smith (the founder of Mormonism), however, claimed there were humans living on the moon that dress like Quakers.
Brigham Young, the successor to Joseph Smith, claimed there were intelligent “inhabitants of the Sun” living on the sun.
The only defense I have for having believed that stuff is that I was only about 14.
Formon*
@@comancess4639 lol
7:26
Neil: “By the year 2000, Fifty thousand people”…
My brain: “…used to live here. Now it’s a ghost town.”
- Cpt. MacMillan, 2007
Nostalgia hits hard 😢
I have a tear in my eye 🥲
The greatest trilogy
this is the most important presentation i have ever watched. very underrated. NDT put a lot of effort and research in making this presentation
Excellent presentation. And to see it was in Dubai. Wow!
I really enjoyed hearing Neil speak on this topic.
This was sooooo, so so....good. Thanks N.D.T.
28:00 Well, yesterday SpaceX took 2 men into orbit. Today those men will doc with the ISS. So that's progress.
Meanwhile the rest of the country burns, its quite sad
Miles Gore this was a competition between Boeing and Spacex which resulted in this achievement. So while it is funded by tax dollars, it was competition between two groups, just like the Cold War
This doesn't mean we are going to go to the moon again or mars, nor mine anything and establish a colony.. Dam i hope hes wrong, but saying that, just because it won't happen in our lifetime doesn't mean it won't ever happen.
@Miles Gore It is free enterprise, what are you talking about? SpaceX's cost per kg is orders of magnitude lower than the competitors, that why they were awarded the contract and can still churn a profit. Low-bid contracts are what runs capitalism and government in this country.
@Miles Gore The government is a customer to these companies. Any company that can do it cheaper would get the contract. The government writes the spec and company x will execute at the agreed upon price. That is free enterprise, that is supply & demand, that is capitalism. The fact that you don't understand that invalidates your entire argument.
GM contracts almost all of its parts and tools out to its suppliers, that's kind of its business model. Does that mean that GM isn't a profit-driven company in the world of capitalism? Spoiler alert, they still make money, especially when they have a stake in those suppliers. Maybe one day when you're older I'll explain vertical vs. horizontal integration to you.
I actually woke up and spent about an hour contemplating this topic this morning, thinking about how you can possibly predict the future when you can't even know what could happen with technology in twenty years, then I get this video recommended to me almost instantly when I get on RUclips. Bet no one predicted that in the future you'd have mind reading apps
I didn't realize i was going to Dubai expo 2020 till a few minutes ago
read.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2015-results-volume-i_9789264266490-en#page46
you think Arab Emirates is a scientific powerhouse? their junior high school kids score below Bulgaria, Slovak Republic, Croatia, Lithuania & Hungary
United Arab Emirates · GDP (current US $) $382.58 billion USD (2017). Bulgaria · GDP (current US$) $56.83 billion USD (2017).Slovak Republic · GDP (current US$) $95.77 billion USD (2017).Croatia · GDP (current US$) $54.85 billion USD (2017).Lithuania · GDP (current US$) $47.17 billion USD (2017).Hungary · GDP (current US$) $139.14 billion USD (2017). wow. where'd you get that FOUR YEAR OLD test data on fifteen year old kids? yeah, I think my numbers are more important than yours. your numbers are for kids who are now in college. take ALL FIVE GDPs from TWO years ago and add them together, you get $393.76 BILLION DOLLARS. the UAE has... a Gross Domestic Product $11.18 BILLION dollars BELOW that total. so. what do you think is more important? how much a country is worth in cash and the products it produces, or the fact that their fifteen year old kids scored a little less than TWENTY POINTS lower in every subject than the WORLD WIDE AVERAGE for that 'test' you cited? seriously, fifteen year old kids who are now 19? you thought that was a valid scale to measure a county's ability to fund space exploration?
@@lesliekilgore648 Oil wealth is not a measure of a country's intellectual success or future scientific progress. Science education/literacy and culturoeconomic attitudes towards STEM R&D and projects however, a strong indicator.
last I checked, if you're poor, you don't have the ability to self educate into a post graduate degree in engineering or physics. you're too busy trying to not starve to death. government support of a space program is the first step to getting anything funded. then the government also has to support the lowest levels of education all the way up to the highest levels. that requires a huge 'pipeline of capital' also, UAE has built... ALL THOSE SKYSCRAPERS... if I recall correctly they've built more stories in a shorter timespan than ANY SOCIETY IN HUMAN HISTORY. and they continue to expand. so I do believe that proves their culture is more than capable of supporting very advanced engineering and mathematics systems. even IF THEY HIRED OUT all the architecture designs to foreign corporations, the government would have to plan the infrastructures to support all those buildings, the construction materials supplies, thousands upon thousands of other details. if you believe the Arabian Peninsula is that rich off of only oil? wow, you do not understand ANYTHING about their governments' infrastructures and wealth generation systems. the ENTIRETY of the WHOLE PENINSULA'S oil reserves was initially discovered and developed by the American exploration and oil industry infrastructure expertise. our companies relocated and trained THREE GENERATIONS of employees, almost FIFTY YEARS worth of employees to the US. the Arabians CONTINUE to send many students here to the US who are children and grand-children of oil corporation employees for their educations. the huge profits from the state owned oil corporations in Arabia? they INVEST the largest amounts of their yearly profits all over the world in other companies and industries as well as supporting their own countries. so, the UAE having the FIRST ARAB NATION'S space program doesn't prove to you that they're committed to the industry?
How did the following comments start down here?
wonderful talk and Q&A Dr. Tyson. Thank you for sharing your insight, knowledge and passion.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
sajindal1, he's misinforming the public. and we'll never colonize space, as space doesn't exist. even Bill Nye, the science guy, admits that mankind is forever stuck on the earth plane. yes, the earth isn't a planet, it's a plane, as evidenced here. ruclips.net/video/vyAh9OENJPU/видео.html
@@robertpunu7624 🤣
@@XxLast__BossxX what are you laughing at? specify.
I just love this guy. I love his ability to communicate complex issues to a unsophisticated public. Right or wrong, it is the public who determines if a society will support a technology.
He does not even know what gravity is
"it is the public who determines if a society will support a technology."
-not necessarily *cough china ...
NO dude the public's concern is to make damned sure that there is a keg for the football game AND some decent coke!!
@@livethefuture2492 Maybe in the USA. That's why nothing gets done anymore. Because the public is composed mainly of uneducated , brain-dead morons who's idea of education during high-school in college was to drink their brains out, play "Shake Shake Bang Bang" learn nothing and hate emigrants. And girls... well, those were in their "304 phase"... They learned to sleep around and suck miles of "D"... Actual science? Studying... Nope... They don't need that shit because obviously they're all 10s...
Those college morons eventually end up growing up and having a vote. But because they are brain-dead, they don't know what to do with their vote and how to use it... They delegate their power to their congressmen... Yeey...
Now those congressmen can go ahead and accept a lot of money from companies who have no interests in supporting technology unless they can make an immediate profit out of it. They user their delegated power to vote however those companies want them to...
However in UAE the public hasn't got much of a say. The ruler's gives the order and their word goes. That's why they are light years ahead of USA in terms of education , infrastructure, wealth,and living standards. That's why they can build 3000 ft tall buildings, bring deserts to life, create palm tree shaped artificial islands and all the other shit that can be seen from space. Is because people are different, and the public hasn't got much of a say in what the government does.
This is one of the best lesson or presentation, I've ever heard.
"A wise man knows he don't know shit"
- J. E. Grimes Jr
Favorite quote
A quote of your own?
@@richiemandina5305 if the quote is factual, does it matter who spoke it?... that might mean that a truthful sounding quote by "Anonymous" can't be truthful or even exist in reality because there is no such person documented in history with the name "Anonymous"...
@@williamghost1516 No need to get all philosophical dude, I just appreciated the quote and noticed that it was credited to a name that his username was cryptically suggestive of.
@@richiemandina5305 so then your comment was pointless?... because he already knew that and everyone else could see that... Dude?... 😁
@@williamghost1516 what's pointless is this interrogation several weeks later from some random, wanting to get to the bottom of a self explanatory comment. It was a little tipping of the hat, if you will, to the "quote" itself and also acknowledging that I didn't just breeze past but took the time to realize he was quoting himself. That's all buddy, mystery solved. Has your curiosity been satiated?
Makes 199% sense! Great arguments! Love Neil!!!
On a tiny scale I saw the difference between industry and science when it comes to making investment decisions first hand. My first years I spent in a public services research facility. Even there, projects were more likely to get funded if they had "practical" applications. But to a much lesser degree as I saw later in my years in industry, where companies would not even want to invest into the successors of their currently profitable products. Exploitation vs exploration over and over again. In my country (germany) I came to conclude that the tax system (and how it forces companies into short term fiscal planning) is a major blocker for innovation. So governments are not always the solution to the problem but sometimes also part of the problem. I feel, that this aspect was left out in this video.
Hey ich bin auch deutscher.Könntest du mir den teil genauer erklärenwo du meinst das unser Steuersystem forschung hindert? Würde mich mal genauer interessieren
I don't agree that's a problem; I don' t even agree that it exists as a thing. Its a matter of perspective. Companies are driven by short term fiscal planning. They want a profit right now if possible, not tomorrow. Developing a product for the market is different from discovering something like particle physics.
@@Pimpmedown There is research in an a sense as it happens in academia and there is research in the sense as it happens in industry. Before a company can invest into new types of products or alternate technologies even in the same domain, some form of research and development needs to be done. For that to be possible, companies need to be able to save up and manage their finances over longer stretches of time (way longer than a year) than the tax rules allow for without having severe penalties. The system penalizes the building up of "war chests" and everything has to be lean. Having surplus and trying to save it up for long term investment simply gets you higher (over the top) taxes as tax wise it counts just like net profit.
@@ruffianeo3418 well so the tax systemonlyprvents research with a higher budget than a company can spare. Savingup for research is fucking stupid. You never know howlongits gonne take so you either work with a continuous amount of money or you dont research stuff. thats how this works.
Also i was wondering about your explanation because there is probably no country that supports product-development as much as germany except china or japan.
Excessive taxation such as in Germany only exacerbates the problem by siphoning more money out of corporations, that COULD otherwise have been invested in R&D -- although corporate R&D is tax-deductible in most modern countries, and it is a safe bet that this is also the case in Germany... BUT anyway, the basic issue remains the same: corporations have, by their very profit-oriented nature, no long-term planning; Governments on the other hand MAY. So even if most of that tax money goes down the drain, at least SOME of it, and if only a tiny fraction, still may be used to fund Universities and other public research institutions. That money would otherwise have gone to the investors (or worse: would have been burnt in ruinous acquisitions and mergers). So, it's no as black and white as one may think.
The passion is inspiring! I've watched this twice so far!
thank you wgs for having these talks and uploading the videos
Love the Van Gogh painting on the back of his Macbook
Starry night 😊
@GrandMaster NightLife SuperKool223 That's an interesting combination of words you compiled there
He has it on his phone too, and even on one of his t-shirt :))
@@nambypamby5531 Wow well spotted!
The only real thing that was there.
Tyson is a round earther with the attitude and energy of a flat earther
Tyson is a genius.
I love listening to this incredible man. 🙏❤️
I predict that in 100 years from now we will be 20 years from achieving fusion energy.
My guess is 30.
Who are you to be so wise in the ways of clairvoyance?
star in a jar...? I'm thinking 50 years. I just hope I can live to 100 to see that.
Pretty sure the official figure is 40. My source for that evidence is that I checked our records for the last 100 years and I discovered that it's always 40.
Don't be so negative. By 2040, nuclear fusion's going to be 100% practical in commercial use.
"640 K RAM should be enough for anyone." - Bill Gates
year?
I believe it.......
If I lived 30 years ago
LMAO 🤓 😙 hahahaha
...for my toaster.
also Bill
"I'm Mars's last Home Boy , Let's make some paper"
I love this. It is just the lecture I’ve been hoping for. How we can’t possibly imagine any advances even twenty years into the future.
The AEU and people there pushing for science and technology are admirable. To revive the Golden Age of science will have the effect of bringing peace and prosperity in the region.
These efforts may influence the retrograde people across the pond in Iran.
Those talented Iranians who perish under a backward looking Shiite regime, may find a future in the AEU.
It’s a matter of goodwill and thinking beyond all prejudices. At the time of Ma’moon, all scientists irrespective of their ethnicities found a seat at the big table in Baghdad.
That spirit must be awakened. This is something that must be awakened locally and not play a second fidel to the importation of science from the West.
Talented people, Indians, Iranians, Pakistanis and from all Arab countries should get together in the AEU.
Right now they are attracted to NASA and defence industries in the United States and other western countries.
The spillover will be to create cooperation which will bring in peace and prosperity replacing the present despondency. Muslims will start winning Nobel Prizes and soon the retro grades will crawl back to their caves where they belong.
Then why did we end up with so many technologies that were predicted by StarTrek?
This presentation absolutely the most impressive and most futuristic and certainly promising....I love it...beautiful..
Who knew I would sit and watch the whole thing! Great work on your presentation! Wow! So motivational. So with the discovery of gravitational wave what are we going to use this discovery for? I don’t know! I love it! Thank you
you obviously love science FICTION dude.
What a joke. If anyone desires to travel in space, then NASA has done its job deceiving us.
IT was a good decision for them to invite Neil!
Why doesn't anyone talk about the interviewer at the end? He did a fantastic job, was a great conversationalist, and. got some great answers out of our personal astrophysicist, NDT. Best wishes to the UAE from the USA! 🙌🏽
Did not see the interview you mentioned..do you mind sharing? Thank you.
tbh the only thing the interviewer did, was to cut/stop the interview haha so besides from looking good, he did nothing :)
I Detected So Much Prejudice It Was Unbelievable!!! The AMEN ✨🎇👨👦
Interviewer name = Saeed Al Gergawi
There's nothing as exciting as listening to intelligent people.
I am old enough to have used a rotary phone. I was amazed that you could make a phone call with a battery powered bag. I couldn't conceive how I could actively type to someone across the globe. I remember Pong and Atari being cutting edge. I now have all of these wonders in my pocket on one device and I'm only 40!!!!!!
I remember the first "Cell phone" I ever saw. It looked like a brick, you could have clubbed someone unconscious with it....
I also remember the smallest cell phone I ever saw. Only had one button, phones got bigger again after that...
I got u bro! Im 38 now and i tried all the phone u mentioned
Why couldn't Orville Wright just say "Big-boobed anime catgirls will not be real by the end of this century."?
With great power comes great responsibility.
By 2040, VR will have graphics, physics, controls and haptics so good that you will be able to see, hear, feel and interact with perfect-looking big boobed catgirls all you want (at least from hardware side, not sure about software, there may be a few years lag). Just look at PS2 ---> PS5 progress in just 20 years.
@@Kynareth6 I think he already has the hardware, dude. Its the lack of software thats the problem to begin with.
@@ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe4681 no, current hardware is really crappy but this is going to change for sure
@@Kynareth6 Yes, he could be gay, but thats not really the joke.
This lecture is so, so beautifully! This sounds so prophetic.... What he is talking so much truth!
No no no you cannot compare religion to Neil's talks, religion is full of lies, pain, maliciousness, not truths, not science , not.pragmatism,
His passion just easily makes you want to know more. Great talk Dr.Tyson, sir!
Biggest take away, Steam Ship Railroad.... Genius.
For years I have been lamenting the lack of Jetson-style air cars. Now I have something new to lament the lack of! Truly a treasure for chronic lamenters :)
It’s still in the works...
Yup heard it before were not goining anyway buddy we dont shuttles we have a olx junk space station we dont have any knew tecknolovy for propulsion since 1945 v2 rockets a mars trip is a lie radiation and solarflares would kill us we dont belong in space except in.star trek and star wars movies. Phd who cares were are we today hubble and robots is all we have were not ever going fo alpha centurai 70000 yr voyage
Only phd hollywood false science we dont belong in space star trek and starwars is false science radiation and v2 rockets from1945 is all we have and a junk space station thank god for hubble and robots to the planets
It would be awesome if ships were not so gigantic :)
Good thing we have Elon Musk.
Tyson is very skeptical of Elon. He/we will see ...
@@martinzitter4551 Well, he was.
@@martinzitter4551 Let him be. Musk has made the only real advancements in heavy lift capacity and re-usability, something Tyson also doubted they could do.
@@conandude76 ~ I certainly agree. It seems that high-profile people who doubt Musk only make him work harder to prove his point.
@@martinzitter4551 To his credit, Tyson has stated several times in his radio show startalk that he was wrong about private enterprise being able / willing to fund the research needed to make colonies on the moon and mars possible.
Gotta give him credit, he was proven wrong, and admitted it freely, and does now openly support spaceX.
"we are running out of time"!! The moderator is self branding, not giving space to the audience and trying to restrict a giant communicator. Thanks to Neil who saved the day!
Uhhh
Dude is a fraud. "We can't prove any of it."
L
Watched it from start to end and didn’t realise where the time went.
Brilliant stuff !
I can’t wait to be watching this in 30 years on my way to Mars
Why would you want to go to Mars, there's enough space on Earth.
@==/A\== Travelling to Mars is absurdly expensive.
@@uzefulvideos3440 "Traveling to mars is absurdly expensive".That's the same reductionist arguement that kept people from exploring new boundaries.The cost for a ticket on a plane used to cost almost 100 grand.Now you can buy a plane ticket for less than 500 dollars.Space travel will continue to decrease the cost to epace travel.He has already slashed the cost to space by 80%.His next starlink venture is expected to give him more than twice the usable capital of nasa.Not just that but his new ticket and spaceship pair are expected to slash the cost to space by another 70%.Even then SpaceX will now be sending colonists to mars for free.They will monetize it.He has said that the cost for a ticket to mars will be from 100-200 grand.Mars trips will happen one way or another.The birth of a new society will irreversibly be brought about.
@==/A\==
Wrong !
Humans will be on Mars in the next 6 years, and that fact doesn't depend on the Moon base.
NASA can do the job of building a base on the Moon, but private companies (Elon Musk) will send humans to Mars, even if that group of people die on the surface of Mars.
If a group of 3 human beings land on Mars in 2025., you can be sure that another group of people will be send on Mars in the year 2026., and arrive on Mars in 2027.
The laws of physics are not against our exploration of Mars with our own hands, legs and eyes.
We can create both of a bases in the same time ; one on Mars, and one on the Moon.
Just be patient and wait for 5 years.
In 2024. humans will start a long distance journey, and in 2025 J will see you in these comment section.
@==/A\== Why are people saying they are going to Mars , they have not been to the Moon yet , and Neil deGrasse Tyson know's that . Going to Mars is NOT going to happen in 2024 , it is going to be more like 2080 .... So you Are right .
“...private enterprise won’t do it...” Elon: hold my beer.
Its funny cause private enterprise and interested laymen were making rockets for a long time before governments got involved and decided to ban and regulate the hell out of getting to space. Forcing people to get government permission first, setting up massive hurddles, making it extremely expensive to get into business. So even starting a small business for fun and building it to see where it goes is pointless.
Moon express spent 20 million campaigning congress just for permission to get to the moon.
And Tyson doesnt even realise the billions which is spent with zero return and zero chance of return by private individuals and businesses. People will do it out of love, out of interest, out of chance, cause they love to gamble, and out of charity. And way more is spent on voluntary research than governments spend. So yeah profit doesnt drive everything
@@nicosmind3 Indeed, Neil is unfortunately rather blind in this area.
it's because they can't go to space, duh! it's a lie, a scam.
Space X partnered with Nasa
Private Enterprise is riding along on the coat tails of a huge amount of public spending - at least from the massive amount of data they have had to learn from and then from all the defense and NASA contracts they have got and then all the people they could employ whose experience was developed at public expense.
Amazing, thanks so much for sharing !
Only passion like this will drive what we want to accomplish
"The delusion is thinking that SpaceX is going to lead the space frontier" Neil Degrasse Tyson 2018
some people get it wrong sooner than others.......
well he himself is human so yeah but I think in some of the podcast or talk that he did, he said and I paraphrase that he regret saying those words cause SpaceX advance so quickly that he couldn't predict their growth.
once again just shows he dont know sh$@ about the subject
@@joewilliekingdom no one can expect technological progression that quick.. if we turn back tie 15 years and I ask you 'do you think we able to make reusable rocket booster like airplanes or cars?' you would definitely answer no
he is intelligent in astrophysics but in technological progression, I don't think anyone is.
@@joewilliekingdom if you can do better go out and do it. Bring something of value, add to the subject, make the improvements you want to see rather than glorify the mistakes of others who dared to try.
@@joewilliekingdom he just laid out that scientists predicting the future are often wrong early in the video
now, imagine that everything neil says here is wrong. *thats* how unpredictable the future is.
He is wrong but the future of the planet is predictable, she can flush us out if needed.
@@bengrizzlyadams6187 i respect that sentiment. i really do.
but when i think about the future, i see both planets and humans as merely an intermediate step, towards something far beyond our limited understanding.
@@klausgartenstiel4586 That is also very possible.
I meant more mechanically, day and night, seasons, it doesn't seem to be as random as that.
@@bengrizzlyadams6187 currently, yes. but a kardashev type I civilization would be able to change that. and a type II would even be able to juggle with whole planets. in the end it's just a matter of how much energy you have at your disposal. and of course whether or not your civilization will be able to harness all the energy without destroying itself ;)
i recommend isaac arthurs videos for more information on this.
@@33eye33 that is probably the most beautiful thing anyone has ever written. i applaude you.
Great respect for Neil deGrasse Tyson, we need more good people like him.
He's not a good person. He hates you. He hates all people. He's bitter because they don't want what he wants and he has become a multi-millionaire in the process. If it came down to saving a starving child or getting a new star named after himself, that would be one very dead child. His selfishness is just different than most others.
Nope sorry.
That was a great inspirational speech by Neil deGrasse Tyson. Two years and a couple of months later, UAE (of all countries!) launch their first Mars mission. So, Neil, you've accomplished your mission to inspire at least one Government to fund some serious Space-related research and to motivate a whole new generation of young people to pursue a career in STEM. Well done, indeed.
As to the second motivator... war and competition: China's also just launched new Mars mission will hopefully act as a new Sputnik moment, and push the US to intensify its own Space program... even if, as Neil pointed it out by citing JFK, it would be for all the wrong reasons. If the only beneficial thing to come out of the current anti-China sentiment in the US were to motivate Trump to pledge to put Americans on Mars by the end of this decade, it would still prove Neil right.
I'm very proud of the UAE for their space program, especially having a brilliant woman scientist in an important role. Space exploration can save the world in many ways.
@Mark Smileer k
@@michaelmerrimer3235 The only logical response to...whatever that was.
This dumbsh!t president we have now couldn't arange a 16 year olds b-day party!
You are confused. Read the New Testament very carefully then you will know the truth. While your at it read the the Old Testament very carefully too! Obviously you will know the truth the day you take your last breath when your face to face with your creator. This man might know how to talk but he sure ain’t smarter than God. The only fish bowl there is, is the one God is looking at and asking the question “Haven’t they learned anything “
I like this guy, he is a realist, a grounder in fact. Here's to you Neil deGrasse Tyson - salute.
positive economic reform ideas. A realist??!!! He lives on a spinning pear flying through space lol the furthest thing from reality there is!
Is actually a little less of a realist than most scientists to be honest, but he is a fantastic communicator to lay audiences
And he plays a physicist on TV
He's preaching Science Fiction
He is a lying bastard, nothing short of.
All starts with a culture change from consumerism to correct education & motivating kids to the sciences. love
May God let us all down lightly. May the veil be lifted for all to see with clear vision. Light love and blessings to all.
This is by far the best talks by Neil degrass Tyson. He seemed very calm and collected also informative.
Not a conversation... ;-)
There were probably 50,000 people on earth working to make it possible for those 3 people living & working in space in 2000.
Clare Degroff, imagine how those 50,000 people going to feel when they find out it was all a scam on mankind. It was all a lie, search for the TRUTHS and you will find it. Don't be the sheep!!! 50 million dollars plus a day and name just ONE THING MANKIND GOT IN RETURN? WE GOT STORIES AND PICTURES!!! THAT IS ALL. Please do tell how the SPACE STATION GOT TO GO 17,500 MPH ? It has NO ROCKETS. ITS ALL A SHOW. A SCAM ON MANKIND!!!
Could save a lot of time and resources by taking an asteroid that was mined for some material and doing it so that it digs out a huge Intersteller Mother Ship to set sail on the electromagnetic waves from the planets and the galaxy itself. Propelling the asteroid spaceship to any point in the galaxy...in time...
Nah, it was 330 million taxpayers, who made all that happen. And that is only accounting those from USA.
@@arewefree at least it is better than trillions spent in war and misery
We need to cut down on military spending and put it to space exploration..
trump did that by creating the space force
Not the US🤷🏿♂️
@@oldnotweak with the awkward assumption that you're not joking, space force has nothing to do with space technology or exploration. It has the goal of militarizing space.
The administration has been attempting to reduce NASA's budget.
@@jarodstrain8905 and NASA has been next to useless in recent years, private companies are outdoing it every day. NASA doesn't deserve a penny anymore. the space force will be what NASA was 50 years ago. and if you think military doesn't push innovation then you have missed thousands of years of human history
@@oldnotweak you comical little fellow. Private companies are building on what NASA began. Private companies do what they do for the sake of attempting to make profit. Without NASA's mention of Science and exploration how much do you think those private companies would have done?
It took nearly 50 years after men walked on the moon before the first private company for space even existed.
If you think NASA doesn't do anything - all you're demonstrating is that you don't know anything about NASA.
hello fellow struggler. in this dark world, i just thought i'd let you know God loves you and to always love yourself no matter the circumstance
23:50 - "You might say, private enterprises will go to Mars. NO! Let me repeat that. NO! I'm just a realist about this."
Elon Musk: hold my unrealistic rockets
Did you miss the part where Elon is revealed as just a for profit delivery guy?
Private enterprise will never go to Mars, unless theres enough profit to be made.
Theres no profit to be made and the costs are prohibitive.
At the moment.
@@sagarah8217 Did you miss the part where SpaceX is building a rocket to go to Mars?
Alon key term “building”. Can sit on earth for the next 100 years if there’s no profit to be made
@@sagarah8217 That's what Starlink is for. Musk has stated that they'll use profits from Starlink to fund Starship development. At the same time SpaceX is not publicly traded and Elon Musk has controlling interest so there's no chance of investors/share holders changing the plan.
I think they done pretty well in envisioning the future. You can now travel by sea and without getting off the boat travel by land to your next destination.
We do spend time on top of the water using customized skiing equipment, water boards...
We also have single person flight machines, hang gliders and more...
The crazy thing is we probably underestimate our future too at the same level they did back then
I do understand you, but being objective and definitive.. those aren't to the extent that these predictions had been envisioned or predicted.. Sure, these are subsets but they are not to the extent that were exaggeratingly, predicted. But i do get you.
AND plenty of drunken idiots to navigate them!!
19:30 based on this assessment Elon Musk is a modern day king
you nailed it
I actually thought of that too. Ultra-wealthy billionaires are the modern day royalty. Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk are spending huge amounts of money on their respective space companies. They are also doing things for a fraction of the cost of a traditional NASA program.
@@markdavis160 Yeah, one of the problems is that sometimes the motivation to do something effectively and the motivation to create and keep jobs clash horribly. NASA is spending big money to develop new DISPOSABLE rockets, and theyre not even cheap. It goes against all reason to develop disposable ones and dump them in the ocean rather than make reusable ones. UNLESS its a bloody farce to keep jobs. Which it is. The whole idea of "jobs" as a commodity is problematic. When your priority is creating jobs, it automatically means youre gonna be wasting resources. This is one argument that would potentially favour the idea of a universal income. Why go through all of the drama to create meaningless unproductive jobs when everyone including the one on the job knows its nonsense, and them give those people wages? It seems much simpler to just give them some money right away. Imagine the amount of bureaucracy that would cut down. But thats still the same problem. Bureaucrats are gonna lose jobs in that case.
@@Likexner Well you would still need to give money to people who haven't produced anything to acquire it with universal income and you need productive jobs to generate money in the first place so you can fund universal income which would make it just a redistribution scheme. The word universal is a misnomer since the people from which the income would be taxed to be given to the rest would be getting less money(universal income - their personal taxes) for many it would mean they get negative universal income(which doesn't make it an income) and for others positive so the whole idea of 'universal income' is flawed it's just the new buzz word for tax increase or deficit spending. If the goal of UBI is getting people out of poverty and the most sustainable way to stay out of poverty is to become productively useful in society so you can get a satisfactory income it would seem better to make people more productive i.e skills, education, build character thus provide free universal skill/education but that wouldn't sell like giving people free money.
@@geraldg350 The real force behind universal income is manipulation (the tool of the weak), in order to give one's weak self a sense of superiority over others. Their view of poverty is wrong*, and their noble intent is a sham. A giving B's money to C is not about C, it is all about A.
UBI will not have the desired intent as long as humans remain universally clueless. The poor, not knowing how to handle money, will blow it on gambling and booze (or worse). It is similar to how science and engineering are progressing blindly, i.e. given continued universal human cluelessness, they are creating all of this science and engineering so a future stupid, clueless human can wield it (I emphasize 'clueless', but 'stupid' applies, and it drives home the point better).
Very interesting and informative. Thank you Sir!
Mankind regresses into laziness when their leaders get comfortable.
Mankind gets complacent and the leaders are symbolic of the degraded population
@Mark Smileer You are 100 % correct. I didnt click the link. Yes NDT is a piece of junk. I have also been saying creator and also talking a out the moon. Its out b4 dark here. Then it goes down and a full moon comes out... I know something is not right at all. Get back to me Thanks Friend.
"Colonization has too much baggage, let's call them settlements."
*Laughs in Palestinian*
@@availanila menmenmen i concur love, hahaha is more feminist friendly so from now on im using hehehe gogo misogyny lmfao
@The Atheist of God. you have brain rot in too many ways, so many problems in ur comment
@God of the Eternal light. Not fiar to lump all liberals together, but I agree Odog Gow = idiot, like the feminist comment. So dumb. I feel like someone deleted their comments but I see his replies. Its funny he said you have brain rot when Odog said the dumbest thing here.
Reserves
It's either go somewhere else eventually or stay here and fight each other over resources and or petty BS forever.
I used to feel like we all could just get along but certain entities keep driving that notion away. We would drastically have to reduce our numbers amongst a lot of other things
I was more impressed by the booster rockets coming back to Earth and landing.
That looked so fake LoL, unbelievable
You’re impressed with CGI? lol
I think it REALLY made the point. Don't you? It was the most exciting thing to happen in half a century.
Tony Duncan A fake event was the “most exciting” thing that you can come up with?
@@anthemgunaether2914 The fact that you are eating food that somebody worthwhile isn't receiving is the only thing about you that troubles me, flattard. The best thing you can do is become an organ donor. Soon.
Yes, hell yes. A hyptomizing speaker about fascinating stuff. A speaker that challenges our minds. I love the man!
Loved how he insisted to bring at least some Q&A culture into that event. Did he try to make it more democratic?
He just loves to educate people and answer good questions
Yes that was great. He is a good guy
Neil just rose a few notches on my "respect meter." Great thoughts and thoughtful answers.
Thank you! I see so many other Americans laughing at India for their efforts and wishing and hoping they fail. But me personally I am loving every moment of what they are doing because I don't see it as us against them. I think innovation and advancement for any one country regardless of who it is, is a win for the science community as a whole. If you're selfish look at it this way. every dollar they spend figuring things out is a dollar you don't have to spend to figure it out. Save the patriotism and competitive nature for later and try to see the bigger picture at hand here.
Lakario Davis very well said good Sir. Many countries loves to bully other countries for the lack of progress in the same field. But like you said in the end it will only benefit us all. It takes failure to make perfect. And even though America is the most advance country when it comes to spacefaring, then who is not to say America can’t learn something from others and vise versa. If more and more countries begin to research in space, then I think that is a great thing... Heck I wish that all countries would unite and work together for the greater good. I think spacefaring would advance super fast then. That will never happen though but one can always dream right. Anyway super good post you made. Oh and sorry for my bad English, I’m from Denmark 🇩🇰 😅
Maybe India should worry about resolving the epedemic of poverty and the corruption that causes it before they try to develop a space program. I mean what's the point of putting hundreds of millions of rupees into trying to get into space when some entitled high caste head wobbler is just going to steal 90% of the budget in baksheesh?
i dont see how America is competing with the indian space program. and i have never heard of any Americans wanting our space program to fail. .
i have utmost respect for the guys at ISRO, they do incredible things while being basically broke.
the problem really with india is that its huge and poor. and in my personal opinion democracy is not working very well here, especially for a country of 1.3 billion people all from diverse cultures.
politicians here are corrupt most just care for getting votes by swaying less-educated populations (what is referred to as 'vote bank' )
so really here in india we just need an actual competent government (perhaps even non-democratic) to create sensible long term policies to grow our economy (which is really just too small for its size - 3Tr for 1.3B people).
we do need to invest more in science and technology and stimulate our industry for economic growth. but without strong government backing, it seems unlikely.
@@Noises They can do both at the same time. It is not 'do one thing or the other'. Besides, humans are still universally clueless, so the problem is not economic or social or political or even psychological, the problem is philosophical (humans have never had a good one). Enter me. Read my philosophy, or go to your grave clueless, your choice.
It depends on why India is engaging in it. If it is national and not for the entire world, then it deserves ridicule.
To be honest I believe it is highly important that young children should be focused on learning about Space and Mars as well as learning how to create ideas and innovation.
Asteroid: Hits Russian space with force of 25 Hiroshima bombs.
Russians: Et tu, Universe?
[..] in Post soviet Russia, space explores YOU ! [..] (c) PBS SpaceTime.
@@piotrd.4850 I think "explore" is still much better than "probe".
You do not want to know where the probe goes.
So many random comments, and Russians speak French why?
@@jeebusk Latin.
Its from Et tu, Brute? You too, Brutus?
The alleged last words of Julius Caesar.
@@ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe4681 Lol thanks for the reference, got it... so Russians speak Latin!
Intro: people wildly underestimated the pace of future advancement.
Later: super conservative estimates about space exploration.
Ron! I want to be fair and understand your point, but I must be too stupid to get it. I suspect you want to point to a contradiction. One solution would be to add the time stamps to each of your references and the second, to explain "wildly underestimate pace of future advancements" versus "super conservative estimates about ... exploration". To me that's not a contradiction, it is rather a confirmation of the intro by the later? Am I wrong?
Lol what
@@curtcoller3632 i agree with everything and idk if youre wrong or not but for whatever reason, i think he was trying to bring attention to Neil saying they under estimated science and at a different time they over estimated it. I think Ron missed the point of why that was contrasted, either that or hes just being a goof
Hmmm... I think this just emphasises Neil's eventual point that you can't truly predict the future in technological advancements.
@Mark Smileer Ever heard of Agricola Tumefacens? Because I am starting to believe that genetic best achievement was to induce cancer in as many people as they could.