On a personal note, I worked with Jane for many years. I found her to be exceptionally kind and sweet. She gave my kids a Shetland pony she had. I once went to her house with my family and one of my nephews. Her little dog nipped at the nose of my nephew. Jane was terribly upset and ran to get ointment to put on the little cut. As she was putting the ointment on his nose, she was shaking. Certainly not the sign of a murderer. Nah, she didn’t do it. She got robbed of her husband, her sons and clearly her freedom.
She created a lovely image of herself in your eyes. If you watch true crime regularly, you know by now, that people with the most loving, caring, emphatic public image (often priests, nurses, policemen, charity organizers ,...), are those who commit the worst crimes. You don't know why she was shaking. Maybe she was angry about your nephew bothering her dog. You assume that she felt horrible. You never lived with her. You know her public image only. Her sons, though, they know who she is. A good person never threatens a husband with a divorce if he does not obey to her rules. That is a huge red flag using the divorce to control somebody. A huge no-no in a marriage. Ask any therapist.
So she supposedly hit her husband over the head, strangled him, got him dressed, dragged him down stairs and into the truck then dragged him out of the truck and placed him on the side of the road, all without getting any of her DNA on him? That makes no logical sense. He was athletic and strong so the prosecution convinced the jurors that she was able to do all of that to him without him fighting back? That whole case should have been thrown out from the beginning.
@@sonny9149 agreed, the false evidence, and handling the evidence improperly, as well as improper storage of evidence that has DNA on it. They decided she was guilty, and nothing else mattered, they then "helped" her son's to decide she was guilty. Kills me everytime justice gets the unlubed shaft.
If she was guilty or not it appears that the police never looked for any other culprit or any other reason why this happened. It would have been possible, even then, to test the blood in the bedroom as blood type testing was available. This seems to be a case of very lazy policing
I don’t think this lady killed her husband. Has anybody ever tried to carry deadweight it’s extremely heavy. There’s no way this woman could drag huge man out to the forest after he was dead. Give me a break.
My daughter gets nose bleeds as an adult and there is always a bloody mess afterwards…it’s strange but true. The DA and Sheriff were too sloppy. I would hate to have had to trust them. I say they got the wrong person and refused to admit it.
I had severe nosebleeds when I was younger and I never bled all over the place, because I would just block my nose with my fingers and put my head back, and would step into the closest bathroom and let my nose bleed into the sink until it coagulated and stopped. Do you mean to tell everyone that daughter doesn’t know how to block her nose after it starts bleeding? This woman lied and got away with murdering her husband.
@@travelwithtony5767 Well good for you for blocking your nose. However, people get nose bleeds for different reasons; some bleeds release blood under pressure, not just a snot nose such as yours, that may spatter over things. Also, many people experience nosebleeds at night when they sleep and wake up to a mess in bed, etc.
A couple kids i have had in my klassroom had nosebleeds at school. They were so bad they had to sit with their heads over.the trash can while someone ran for the school nurse. The head back with the nose squeezed didn't work for them.@CMD4WP
The greatest fear of most people's lives is to be accused of something that they didn't do and then get punished for it by the American justice system. A living nightmare!
How did she get his body from the bedroom all the way to the lake?!! This is the most ridiculous case WITH OUT DNA! How do those detectives even sleep at night?!
One of our dogs had an injury to his ear after another dog bit him, and we had blood all over the house for years afterwards I find blood splatter in odd places
Please note that this woman's sons testified against her-there is also a Forensic Files episode on this case that clearly presents evidence against this woman that is not in this episode-this show on this case is highly biased toward the defense's case.
The victim didn’t go for a run - his shoe soles were clean - forensic files said he was probably dressed and transported to the place his body was found. Seems to be family member(s) to be able to do this.
58 degrees in Temple, Texas tonight, light rain all day, like pea soup out there! I'm cozy warm inside and so happy there's a new 48 to watch tonight! Have a good night 48 Fam!🥰☔🌧
It's a shame how many people this happens to and dont have anyone fighting for them or can't afford to. They need to do better.😢 The legal system is NOT just.
If he was killed the night before after he ate and she said he went for a jog the next day she killed him or why would she lie about him going for a jog? Maybe she is covering up for some1 or she did it either way she knows exactly what happened to him.
Just like they said, that's "junk science." Dozens of trucks could have left the same tracks, thats why it was not allowed by the judge when they were preparing for the second trial.
I was just wondering why the carpet wouldn’t have been thoroughly cleaned after her husband had a nosebleed? Why would her children go against her? And isn’t the bedroom an odd place to dispose of horse syringes? What would the motive be for this man to be killed?
I saw this case a few years back and thought she was guilty because of the blood spatter until my dog got bit in the ear by my neighbor's dog and he shook his head spraying blood all over the walls. I mean, it was so bad I told my husband it looked like a crime scene. I'm not sure she is guilty anymore 😓 and I also know people that when they have a nose bleed it's bad 🤔
I have a hard time believing an engineer and a nurse are letting blood just drip around the house, and let their dog get fluids all over from an abscess. What is this Cousin Eddie's dog "Snots"...
The best people to know her and what likely happened are her children. Even if they were not there. Two testified against her and she/her lawyer tried to frame another. She's guilty imo.
Huh? A jury…”knew”? No logic here. They didn’t know anything. They came to a conclusion based on a presentation, a narrative , a small slice of the facts.
No. Her original conviction was overturned meaning she no longer had that conviction. They could have retried her if they wanted because her original conviction no longer existed. Hope that helps.
I believe her daughter might be the killer, or was there after the death , and helped her mother move the body. Even though a family member said she was visiting with them, doesn't make it true. Both mother and daughter are responsible,they moved the body together 😮.
I, too, believed that justice prevails and innocent people remain free. You just had to trust our Justice System. Then it happened to my son! The "show" that the D.A. put on was spectacular. If i didnt know my son, I'd have convicted him too. Prosecution is allowed to lie in court! I never would have believed that. I was acrually thrown out of the courtroom and threatened with a contempt charge, when I shockingly blurted out," that's a LIE!", when the D.A. made an egregiously false statement. Thank GOD for DNA. Thats all I can say about THAT, except for my son's trial also taking place in a CALIFORNIA court. 😢❤
That bedroom wasn't the scene of a 'violent bludgeoning' and her DNA wasn't anywhere to be found on the victim. The prosecutor asserted in court that Jane dressed the dead body in jogging clothes and hauled him to the site where he was found, which means she either 'violently bludgeoned' her husband while he was in the nude, or she undressed him out of the clothes he was murdered in, and re-clothed him in his jogging outfit. I don't believe she bludgeoned him in the nude, and there's no evidence in the bedroom or anywhere else that she undressed and re-clothed a bludgeoned body, not to mention they claim she did so without leaving any of her own DNA behind on him, as DNA testing demonstrably excluded her when it found male DNA that was not the victim's. Those detectives should be ashamed of themselves. No follow up on the witness leads who saw the victim jogging, no follow up on the black pickup truck. Pathetic
I wasn’t sure until they said she agreed to try to pin it on her daughter…. No innocent, loving mom could EVER do such a despicable thing!! How could you be so selfish???
Also, In my 30+ years of life, including growing up with four brothers who were constantly injuring themselves and bleeding on stuff, never have I ever seen blood get on the ceiling… Especially from a nose bleed.
Exactly! Putting the blame on her very own daughter is disgusting! No matter if she “trusted” her lawyer or not. As a mother myself, I would never allow that to happen. How dare she?
Children especially boys will take the mother's side almost all the time but if they do not then you know that there's something really wrong with that woman.
Whether she did it or not, I'm not arguing the point. I believe the prosecutor thinks that 20 years in prison for this crime was enough. Other killers got less time. What I've seen many times is that the prosecutor will almost never agree with a not guilty verdict even if the evidence proves it. That would cast doubt on their ability to take cases to court and win.
Reasonable doubt. Bad forensics. She comes across very believable. That bedroom did not look like a crime scene to me. When I saw the forensics guy in photos, not wearing gloves? Come on. Lack of testing is very suspect. My dogs have bled all over the house. They are farm dogs. The syringe, which looked like the most incriminating piece of evidence to me; except he didn't even have horse tranquilizer in his system.!! I personally cut myself a lot. I work outside a lot, and live on a farm, and I am clumsy. There's blood all over my place I am sure. How could she lift him into the truck? You all just don't want to hear it. I am shocked at all the comments raging against her, and not even listening to the problems with this case. She was locked up for 22 years, they let her go. That makes her innocent! My step mom ran my Dad's house, so what? That's just the way it was. They loved each other with all their hearts. ps. I saw forensic files too
That’s a lot of blood to come from a dog’s body or a man’s bloody nose. I have nosebleeds, but I’ve never had them seep into the carpet and floor boards. And they don’t cause medium velocity spatter. And to let her attorney throw her daughter under the bus is despicable. I’m glad she served time just for that.
@@rockapartiehaving a bathroom “look like a slaughter house” and blood seeping through the carpet and into the floorboards are totally different things.
@@Yes_Anastasia No they're not. Assuming everyone's nosebleeds are like yours is incredibly naive. Take half a shot of water (12 ml) and see for yourself how little liquid it takes for it to seep through the carpet.
Very strange that the 48 hours episode doesn't mention the impending divorce, nor the recently created life insurance policy, nor did they use her actual booking photo. The evidence presented in the 48 hours episode is as sloppy as the prosecutions case, it is clearly meant to push a narrative, and this lady was ONLY released, not because of directly exonerating evidence, but due to sloppy portions of the investigation. I personally wouldn't be able to find her guilty on a jury, but personally, I agree with her son.
They didn't show a new episode this week because it didn't air on Saturday. Why do you guys get so angry about shows being shown more than once? These are lives behind these shows. You are coming across as insensitive.
@@savannahsylviaanka1029and yet she still went along with it. I’m sorry, but she is either guilty or a terrible mother. Disgusting for her to allow that.
What a disgrace of police work and of course John Jay had to come to the rescue. I would be infuriated and I hope she sues the city and the police for their sloppy works.jane find out what really happened to your hubby.
Her lawyers ran their defense strategy by her and she agreed to it. She could have insisted the lawyers not suggest her daughter did it and she didn't.
and everything indicates she's very bossy. so she absolutely agreed on the strategy. now maybe the daughter told her it was ok too. there are some strange dynamics going on there.
If she gave her horse's injections "all the time", why didn't she have a Sharps container for the used syringes and needles?? Seems irresponsible to just discard them the way she did. Also, that must have been one helluva nose bleed to cause a stain that large on the mattress. Why do they always use that lame excuse?? She was way too composed during the interview. I would be a basket case. A lot of "I, I, I" too. She's guilty imho, and I don't think the daughter is too innocent either.
But if she were going to try to clean the blood on the carpet by the stove, why wouldn't she also have tried to clean the other spots? Why leave them there?
I know I've seen this case before and I could be confusing this with something else, but isn't this? The one where her tire prints were also found at the scene, and she had a completely ridiculous excuse as to why they were there??!?
HOW MANY MORE ARE STILL IN PRISON?! THIS IS EXACTLY WHY I PREFER TO VOTE NOT GUILTY. Watching documentary like this one ,I'm surprised how easy people say GUILTY. Even though its obvious that this person was simply FRAMED. Ladies have periods, men can get hurt, but they preferred to belive tunneled view.
Not speaking of her guilt or innocence, bad police work and evidence should be thrown out. I actually think her second defense did well and wasn’t scummy. This isn’t like the C unty Anthony trial where there’s overwhelming evidence, good police work, scummy defense. Just sayin.
I will never understand why people do the things they do to harm other people or take them out this world and makes absolutely no sense I understand evil exists everywhere and you can't see evil coming but at the same time why does that person have to be so evil to do evil deeds ... I'm just speaking in general you just have to wonder what these people go through how their parents treat them how they brainwash them how they made them want to be evil instead of being good.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
On a personal note, I worked with Jane for many years. I found her to be exceptionally kind and sweet. She gave my kids a Shetland pony she had. I once went to her house with my family and one of my nephews. Her little dog nipped at the nose of my nephew. Jane was terribly upset and ran to get ointment to put on the little cut. As she was putting the ointment on his nose, she was shaking. Certainly not the sign of a murderer. Nah, she didn’t do it. She got robbed of her husband, her sons and clearly her freedom.
Thank you for sharing this.
Thank you for sharing this
She created a lovely image of herself in your eyes. If you watch true crime regularly, you know by now, that people with the most loving, caring, emphatic public image (often priests, nurses, policemen, charity organizers ,...), are those who commit the worst crimes. You don't know why she was shaking. Maybe she was angry about your nephew bothering her dog. You assume that she felt horrible. You never lived with her. You know her public image only. Her sons, though, they know who she is. A good person never threatens a husband with a divorce if he does not obey to her rules. That is a huge red flag using the divorce to control somebody. A huge no-no in a marriage. Ask any therapist.
@@Juliennaany therapist peddling that manure is a charlatan.🙄
Never trust the quiet ones
So she supposedly hit her husband over the head, strangled him, got him dressed, dragged him down stairs and into the truck then dragged him out of the truck and placed him on the side of the road, all without getting any of her DNA on him? That makes no logical sense. He was athletic and strong so the prosecution convinced the jurors that she was able to do all of that to him without him fighting back? That whole case should have been thrown out from the beginning.
you are the only one who made any sense here
Agreed...
That alone was so far fetched.., also the prosecuting attorney lying about the blood testing that actually had never been done should face charges.
@@sonny9149 agreed, the false evidence, and handling the evidence improperly, as well as improper storage of evidence that has DNA on it.
They decided she was guilty, and nothing else mattered, they then "helped" her son's to decide she was guilty. Kills me everytime justice gets the unlubed shaft.
And he cleaned up his bedroom after he was dead, I suppose.
If she was guilty or not it appears that the police never looked for any other culprit or any other reason why this happened. It would have been possible, even then, to test the blood in the bedroom as blood type testing was available. This seems to be a case of very lazy policing
I don’t think this lady killed her husband. Has anybody ever tried to carry deadweight it’s extremely heavy. There’s no way this woman could drag huge man out to the forest after he was dead. Give me a break.
Plus evedice is left behind in drag marks.
My daughter gets nose bleeds as an adult and there is always a bloody mess afterwards…it’s strange but true. The DA and Sheriff were too sloppy. I would hate to have had to trust them. I say they got the wrong person and refused to admit it.
I had severe nosebleeds when I was younger and I never bled all over the place, because I would just block my nose with my fingers and put my head back, and would step into the closest bathroom and let my nose bleed into the sink until it coagulated and stopped.
Do you mean to tell everyone that daughter doesn’t know how to block her nose after it starts bleeding?
This woman lied and got away with murdering her husband.
@@travelwithtony5767 Well good for you for blocking your nose. However, people get nose bleeds for different reasons; some bleeds release blood under pressure, not just a snot nose such as yours, that may spatter over things. Also, many people experience nosebleeds at night when they sleep and wake up to a mess in bed, etc.
Me too, I have them twice a year maybe. I must tell my wife that if something happens to me, she's gonna get an orange jumpsuit.
This is incredibly sad. I feel for this poor woman.
A couple kids i have had in my klassroom had nosebleeds at school. They were so bad they had to sit with their heads over.the trash can while someone ran for the school nurse. The head back with the nose squeezed didn't work for them.@CMD4WP
The greatest fear of most people's lives is to be accused of something that they didn't do and then get punished for it by the American justice system. A living nightmare!
she did it
How did she get his body from the bedroom all the way to the lake?!! This is the most ridiculous case WITH OUT DNA! How do those detectives even sleep at night?!
Like they sleep every night, like a baby!
WITH OUT DNA! How do those detectives even sleep at night?
Answer : They sleep during the day.
No DNA? Sorry! You have been misinformed..
ruclips.net/video/jipHebWE9Os/видео.htmlsi=mxhUXgYUt2BZaeq3
She’s a farmer, Einstein
They’re creative
It's a ranch. Wheelbarrows, horses, carriages
One of our dogs had an injury to his ear after another dog bit him, and we had blood all over the house for years afterwards I find blood splatter in odd places
You’d think her number one goal would be to find who killed her husband.
Because she already knows who killed her husband
She could have called OJ for help...
Good Observation 💯
She probably just found good loopholes
Lots of judgement in the comments. Wow, merry Christmas.
They can dna all that blood. If it’s animal blood they’d know.
Please note that this woman's sons testified against her-there is also a Forensic Files episode on this case that clearly presents evidence against this woman that is not in this episode-this show on this case is highly biased toward the defense's case.
I had the same feeling!!
Totally agree 💯
Her every comment feels so rehearsed and ingenious! I feel she did it!
Right. Some random person strangled a jogger. Come ON.
I'm confused. Blood on the ketamin syringe, but no drug in his body? How is that evidence?
Hell no! Why do they always say the victim had a nose bleed? Tf
You ask why... Because it creates the sense of reasonable doubt, even if there's zero evidence to prove otherwise... take care...
I have nose bleeds very often. Deviated septum
I have nosebleeds all the time, but I don't let it get everywhere. Like behind the fireplace? Come on.
She never talks about finding his killer😮
Her sons gave me a bad vibe. I don't trust them.
The victim didn’t go for a run - his shoe soles were clean - forensic files said he was probably dressed and transported to the place his body was found. Seems to be family member(s) to be able to do this.
At least her husband got justice. Over 20 years.
Happy Friday all 😊 it's misty rain and 58 here in east Texas, perfect timing for watching ❤
Listening from North TX traffic haha. Spitting rain here too
Midnight here in Ireland. 🇮🇪 cold beautiful sky.. warm in bed
Though cloudy this evening, temps have been pleasant and weather mild here at beautiful Virginia Beach. ⛱️ Enjoy your night, 48 Fam! ❤
58 degrees in Temple, Texas tonight, light rain all day, like pea soup out there! I'm cozy warm inside and so happy there's a new 48 to watch tonight! Have a good night 48 Fam!🥰☔🌧
About 20 degrees and climbing in Wisconsin. Supposed to have a balmy 40 degree weekend!
It's a shame how many people this happens to and dont have anyone fighting for them or can't afford to. They need to do better.😢 The legal system is NOT just.
How would you let your dog have an open abcess wound on its face? How would you let it get that bad. Irresponsible pet owner. That’s abuse.
It would be sweet to find out who the killer was as well.
It's her, the wife.
If he was killed the night before after he ate and she said he went for a jog the next day she killed him or why would she lie about him going for a jog? Maybe she is covering up for some1 or she did it either way she knows exactly what happened to him.
"some1" isn't a word.
He ate leftovers earlier that day before going for his jog.
The tire tracks alone is enough, that she was at the crime scene.
Just like they said, that's "junk science." Dozens of trucks could have left the same tracks, thats why it was not allowed by the judge when they were preparing for the second trial.
I was just wondering why the carpet wouldn’t have been thoroughly cleaned after her husband had a nosebleed? Why would her children go against her? And isn’t the bedroom an odd place to dispose of horse syringes? What would the motive be for this man to be killed?
Only the wife had the motive. Spouses often have grudges they wouldn't show anyone.
I saw this case a few years back and thought she was guilty because of the blood spatter until my dog got bit in the ear by my neighbor's dog and he shook his head spraying blood all over the walls. I mean, it was so bad I told my husband it looked like a crime scene. I'm not sure she is guilty anymore 😓 and I also know people that when they have a nose bleed it's bad 🤔
It's an unprecedented case bcz forensics got practically everything wrong and it made Jane look extremely guilty
Motive. There's always a motive. She was the only one with it.
That was one major nose bleed!
Your right 👍 I've had my nose 👃 broken in a sledding 🛷 🥶 accident 🤕 it didn't bleed 🩸 that much 😮
@@juniorjohnson5961 Why did I get a notification from you, but you were replying to someone else's comment, not mine?
The final analysis was that NOT all the strains were blood much less the husband's blood.
I have a hard time believing an engineer and a nurse are letting blood just drip around the house, and let their dog get fluids all over from an abscess. What is this Cousin Eddie's dog "Snots"...
@@juniorjohnson5961 I have had terrible nose bleeds that bled profusely. People who get them chronically can tell you it is not uncommon.
Those sons really should be ashamed of themselves!!!!
The best people to know her and what likely happened are her children. Even if they were not there. Two testified against her and she/her lawyer tried to frame another.
She's guilty imo.
You're totally right. "My daughter did it. She hated her dad; look at her muscles!"
Pretty sure she’s defending one of her kids. Will go to the grave to protect one of them. One has passed as well…
Those closed minded lawyers, LE, justice workers are infuriating. Another shoddy job where an innocent person lands in prison.
My heart exploses with pride that groups like Loyola Law school save people like this
A jury heard her case & knew she did it. Her sons testified against her. She can't answer questions about husband & maintain eye contact. GUILTY!
Huh? A jury…”knew”? No logic here. They didn’t know anything. They came to a conclusion based on a presentation, a narrative , a small slice of the facts.
They just “knew” nothing the only people that knew anything for sure is the killer and the other one is dead .
The horse did it.
The horses were the motive. Indirectly, yes.
Wouldn't a second trial for the same crime be double jeopardy?
If theres no body then yes. But in this case his body was found
No. Her original conviction was overturned meaning she no longer had that conviction. They could have retried her if they wanted because her original conviction no longer existed. Hope that helps.
I wonder why her sons thought she did it
Because they know she did it.
They looked at the evidence and knew their mother. I wonder if they asked the boys what their thoughts were on their sister's abilities and anger.
Because they KNOW HER !!!
I think she is guilty, but I also think she didn't do it alone.
Yup I've always felt she had help
I believe her daughter might be the killer, or was there after the death , and helped her mother move the body. Even though a family member said she was visiting with them, doesn't make it true. Both mother and daughter are responsible,they moved the body together 😮.
WHAT I WANT TO KNOW IS WHY THEIR 2 SONS TESTIFIED AGAINST THEIR MOTHER ???????
I think she should count her blessings she's gonna fool around with this law suit and get recharged. I'd be thankful I'm out and not push it.
Nah. Fight. Anyone can lay down. Stand up and fight
How obvious it is that she committed the crime
Corrupt people corrupt. What a method to keep job security. Pray you never get arrested.
So pathetic that some cops and lawyers are just so clueless and innocent people are paying for their mistakes..
I, too, believed that justice prevails and innocent people remain free. You just had to trust our Justice System. Then it happened to my son! The "show" that the D.A. put on was spectacular. If i didnt know my son, I'd have convicted him too. Prosecution is allowed to lie in court! I never would have believed that. I was acrually thrown out of the courtroom and threatened with a contempt charge, when I shockingly blurted out," that's a LIE!", when the D.A. made an egregiously false statement.
Thank GOD for DNA. Thats all I can say about THAT, except for my son's trial also taking place in a CALIFORNIA court. 😢❤
She served almost 20 years in prison though, and she is now in her 70s. So, if she is genuinely guilty, maybe she has been punished enough.
Have to express remorse and stay out of trouble in the prison system and then go up for parole.
@@Friendofstfrankapparently she did stay out of trouble in prison.
Maybe if she admitted her guilt.
I think Jane is innocent, sometimes authorities won’t accept mistakes, that’s so sad for “victims of justice” 😡😡😳😳
Then who killed him and why?
Very true sometimes they just want someone arrested and behind bars for a crime to get it off the books .They made many mistakes with this.
Sometimes cops make mistakes ? No, sometimes they get it right
@@molliemae6855great question PLUS why wasn't Jane The Wife not concerned AT ALL with who actually committed this crime 😔 😞
She is not guilty
How could her sons not see that?
Cause maybe they was involved in his death?...
On my First time seeing this case I thought she wasn't guilty and still think same. DNA will always prevail.
I agree if she did this there would be her DNA on something.
That bedroom wasn't the scene of a 'violent bludgeoning' and her DNA wasn't anywhere to be found on the victim. The prosecutor asserted in court that Jane dressed the dead body in jogging clothes and hauled him to the site where he was found, which means she either 'violently bludgeoned' her husband while he was in the nude, or she undressed him out of the clothes he was murdered in, and re-clothed him in his jogging outfit. I don't believe she bludgeoned him in the nude, and there's no evidence in the bedroom or anywhere else that she undressed and re-clothed a bludgeoned body, not to mention they claim she did so without leaving any of her own DNA behind on him, as DNA testing demonstrably excluded her when it found male DNA that was not the victim's.
Those detectives should be ashamed of themselves. No follow up on the witness leads who saw the victim jogging, no follow up on the black pickup truck. Pathetic
@@RRonco Couldn’t have said it better.
It would be hard for me to forgive my sons.
What a terribly sad injustice done on this case. Thank goodness she advocated for herself.
What deplorable investigative work!
I believe that the jurors got it right. The evidence is clear. The daughter knows the truth!
Alex, I’ll take “she’s guilty as f.” For $800.
Happy Friday the 13th.
Jason Voorhees? 😳😳
aw, I nearly get the whole way through the day without realising the date...then you turn up😮
@@markjoseph196 🤣
And happy full moon also in east Texas 😊😊
Happy Friday the 13th!!!! 🖤
I wasn’t sure until they said she agreed to try to pin it on her daughter…. No innocent, loving mom could EVER do such a despicable thing!! How could you be so selfish???
Also, In my 30+ years of life, including growing up with four brothers who were constantly injuring themselves and bleeding on stuff, never have I ever seen blood get on the ceiling… Especially from a nose bleed.
Exactly! Putting the blame on her very own daughter is disgusting! No matter if she “trusted” her lawyer or not. As a mother myself, I would never allow that to happen. How dare she?
How many times has this happened and they didnt get an innocence project to help and died in prison wile the real prsn killed again?!
I think she is innocent
Just because it's possible, doesn't mean its likely. The most likely story is that she killed him. But who knows..
But you need proof beyond any reasonable doubt. I see reasonable doubts here.
Children especially boys will take the mother's side almost all the time but if they do not then you know that there's something really wrong with that woman.
I believe she innocent
Law Enforcement and Prosecution dropped the ball too many times. I believe she's innocent.
I also believe she is innocent!!!
thats not what the syringe said 😂
Nah, the dinner food still in the stomach clearly shows otherwise.
She killed him or my name isn't Joshua Wayne York (and it is...)
I agree with you JW.
Whether she did it or not, I'm not arguing the point. I believe the prosecutor thinks that 20 years in prison for this crime was enough. Other killers got less time. What I've seen many times is that the prosecutor will almost never agree with a not guilty verdict even if the evidence proves it. That would cast doubt on their ability to take cases to court and win.
I would have acquitted her.
Me too 👍
I wouldn't.
Me too!!
Until something like this happens to you and your family...this lady is guilty af!!
Have others also noticed that Jane looks defiant and vicious in her mugshot !! 😮
She totally did it!!
Reasonable doubt. Bad forensics. She comes across very believable. That bedroom did not look like a crime scene to me. When I saw the forensics guy in photos, not wearing gloves? Come on. Lack of testing is very suspect. My dogs have bled all over the house. They are farm dogs. The syringe, which looked like the most incriminating piece of evidence to me; except he didn't even have horse tranquilizer in his system.!!
I personally cut myself a lot. I work outside a lot, and live on a farm, and I am clumsy. There's blood all over my place I am sure. How could she lift him into the truck?
You all just don't want to hear it. I am shocked at all the comments raging against her, and not even listening to the problems with this case. She was locked up for 22 years, they let her go. That makes her innocent!
My step mom ran my Dad's house, so what? That's just the way it was. They loved each other with all their hearts.
ps. I saw forensic files too
Well said! Every point I was trying to make! She’s innocent.
Best comment
Food was still in his stomach and she said he went running in the morning
She's guilty as sin🤦🏻♀️🇬🇧
I'd love to know the presenters' honest opinion on some of these cases.
@44:35
their opinions are here.....right here in this video
That’s a lot of blood to come from a dog’s body or a man’s bloody nose. I have nosebleeds, but I’ve never had them seep into the carpet and floor boards. And they don’t cause medium velocity spatter. And to let her attorney throw her daughter under the bus is despicable. I’m glad she served time just for that.
Surely they know the difference between dogs blood and his blood?...
And I had nosebleeds where the bathroom looked like a slaughterhouse afterwards, so what?!
@@rockapartiehaving a bathroom “look like a slaughter house” and blood seeping through the carpet and into the floorboards are totally different things.
@@Yes_Anastasia No they're not. Assuming everyone's nosebleeds are like yours is incredibly naive.
Take half a shot of water (12 ml) and see for yourself how little liquid it takes for it to seep through the carpet.
Sloppy investigation.
Very strange that the 48 hours episode doesn't mention the impending divorce, nor the recently created life insurance policy, nor did they use her actual booking photo. The evidence presented in the 48 hours episode is as sloppy as the prosecutions case, it is clearly meant to push a narrative, and this lady was ONLY released, not because of directly exonerating evidence, but due to sloppy portions of the investigation. I personally wouldn't be able to find her guilty on a jury, but personally, I agree with her son.
Wow! There’s a bonus podcast at the end!-
The reupload of a reupload 🙄...
Of a reupload 😮
Was thinking the same thing. They're just plain lazy now. 🙄
Of another reupload 😂
They didn't show a new episode this week because it didn't air on Saturday. Why do you guys get so angry about shows being shown more than once? These are lives behind these shows. You are coming across as insensitive.
There are a lot of wifes that destroy their homes for stupid reasons, and believe that the husbands are the ones to blame.
Wives!
she is the killer. However after 20 years in prison and at age 70 maybe she deserves parole but she needs to admit and feel sorry for her crime first.
If she did it ! You don’t know she did .
She has an explanation for everything 🤨🙄 (and of course only her lawyer was to blame for her cold strategy of blaming her daughter 🙄)
But she ALLOWED her lawyers to try and blame her daughter? The wife is GUILTY
She did not want that defense. All the evidence that showed her innocence seemed to be ignored.
They just took her life 🤯🤯🤯🤯😨😨😨
She threw her daughter under the bus. I saw something on this years ago. She was clearly guilty. Should still be in prison.
💯% agree!
She didnt..she told the lawyer she didnt wanted this
@@savannahsylviaanka1029and yet she still went along with it. I’m sorry, but she is either guilty or a terrible mother. Disgusting for her to allow that.
Yeah she totally killed her husband. Not a single care about justice for Bob, she only cares about herself.
Yep I’ve seen this before, if I were on the jury, I would’ve voted to convict
The state thinks 🤔 differently I see reasonable doubt.
True😢
Food still in the stomach but she said he went running in the morning
Nothing was mentioned about the sons (apart from them thinking she did it)- I'm guessing they properly checked them both out..?
NOSE BLEEDING Doesn't Squirt all over the Bedroom 😮😅,,. Come on people!!
She Couldn't Even Try To Explain How Hes Blood Gote Allover The Bedroom 😢😢😢..
What a disgrace of police work and of course John Jay had to come to the rescue. I would be infuriated and I hope she sues the city and the police for their sloppy works.jane find out what really happened to your hubby.
Her lawyers ran their defense strategy by her and she agreed to it. She could have insisted the lawyers not suggest her daughter did it and she didn't.
and everything indicates she's very bossy. so she absolutely agreed on the strategy. now maybe the daughter told her it was ok too. there are some strange dynamics going on there.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Who knows for sure. Disnmissal without prejudice.
She seems innocent
If she gave her horse's injections "all the time", why didn't she have a Sharps container for the used syringes and needles?? Seems irresponsible to just discard them the way she did. Also, that must have been one helluva nose bleed to cause a stain that large on the mattress. Why do they always use that lame excuse?? She was way too composed during the interview. I would be a basket case. A lot of "I, I, I" too. She's guilty imho, and I don't think the daughter is too innocent either.
@@nowayhose-mi2onthe one seep through is blood
But if she were going to try to clean the blood on the carpet by the stove, why wouldn't she also have tried to clean the other spots? Why leave them there?
This case continues to baffle me every time I see anything about it
probably because she did it but she is petty convincing
WHAT EVIDENCE DID THEY EVEN HAVE AGAINST JANE ???????
She’s innocent.I believe her.
Guilty. Case closed.
I know I've seen this case before and I could be confusing this with something else, but isn't this? The one where her tire prints were also found at the scene, and she had a completely ridiculous excuse as to why they were there??!?
First! Happy Friday ❤
What happened to Nick Dorotik?
HOW MANY MORE ARE STILL IN PRISON?!
THIS IS EXACTLY WHY I PREFER TO VOTE NOT GUILTY.
Watching documentary like this one ,I'm surprised how easy people say GUILTY. Even though its obvious that this person was simply FRAMED. Ladies have periods, men can get hurt, but they preferred to belive tunneled view.
She probably used gloves she use gloves she used when working with her horses.
I couldn't imagine never knowing the truth!
Not speaking of her guilt or innocence, bad police work and evidence should be thrown out. I actually think her second defense did well and wasn’t scummy. This isn’t like the C unty Anthony trial where there’s overwhelming evidence, good police work, scummy defense. Just sayin.
Casey Anthony's lawyer claimed her father killed Caylee her daughter. So it worked for her.
She's so guilty
There was not very much blood.
I will never understand why people do the things they do to harm other people or take them out this world and makes absolutely no sense I understand evil exists everywhere and you can't see evil coming but at the same time why does that person have to be so evil to do evil deeds ... I'm just speaking in general you just have to wonder what these people go through how their parents treat them how they brainwash them how they made them want to be evil instead of being good.
No brainer. ..maam u did it
LOL! Jane is totally guilty!
How come this case does not fall under double jeopardy?