Sonnet 3.5 is my favorite for writing prose from my beats, however when I put my latest book into Autocrit to edit it (which I do three chapters at a time)-holy moly, Sonnet 3.5 used the word ‘SLIGHTLY’ a whopping 112 times in the first 3 chapters. Everything my characters did-they did it SLIGHTLY. It was so damn funny, but aggravating, too. It really overloaded the amount of revisions I had to do to fix it. I definitely need to tweak Sonnet’s word usage penalty especially since I had included instructions to omit adverbs!
💪 Absolute gold mine for anyone looking to 10x their AI game. Here's what actually matters for builders: Projects Feature (14:58) - You can upload entire documents/books as context for AI to reference. Game-changer for content creation and research. No more context limitations. Prompt Generator Hack (12:45) - Anthropic's console has a built-in prompt generator that turns basic prompts into pro-level instructions. Instant upgrade to your AI outputs. XML Tags Strategy (21:44) - Using XML tags in your prompts (like and ) makes Claude way more precise. Perfect for systematizing your AI workflows. Pro tip: The free tier is solid, but if you're serious about scaling, the $20 Pro version unlocks the real power with higher limits and advanced features. Anyone here actually tried Claude for building systems in their business? Drop your results below 👇
my sister and i using claude for works and acads purposes, and use Undetectable AI to refines claude's ai generated text. now im happy to share here that Undetectable AI’s latest feature is an AI essay writer that makes text sound more human.
I consider myself 'pretty good' at this, by now, but I still learned a few new things from watching this video. I've been putting the "long" data at the end of the prompt (shame) and not been using the documents like I should. Also I've never played with the tool for prompt engineering. Also I'd never heard of fractal prompting. Jolly good :P
I've been using Claude Pro for awhile and consider myself to be quite adept. I didn't know about the recommendations from Anthropic, though, so I appreciate your highlighting them. Overall, your course is great for people wanting to improve their experience with Claude.
I cannot download the files in a user-friendly format. TSX doesn't work anywhere or can be converted to a PDF or PNG, I wanted to create some dashboards and charts, but I cannot open them or use them because of the TSX format, any tips for this?
I have been using Claude 3.5 sonnet a lot lately to write my first novel. I have found a way that works really well. Only issue I have is hitting the limit on the pro plan and it not wanting to write certain things like violence.
Love the synergy aspect. Allows me to be more creative, with an "assist button". Feed it a rough draft and have it evaluate what I wrote for emotion, clarity, etc. I read the responsed, sort through and pick the best suggestions and rewrite those to get the improvement I'm looking for. I am synergizing Claude efforts with mine to get a combined result. Love that.
How to use Claude/other AIs to replace editors in the book writing process? Editing is the key series of tasks in fiction book writing I need to solve: Editorial Assessment/Content Editing, Copy Editing, Proofreading, and maybe even Fact-Checking (for non-fiction). How to handle 60k-100k word novels for the higher level editing of plot/character-arc analysis when limited to chapter by chapter uploads? Would the prompt start with "Imagine you are a top New York publishing house editing team ... "
Great video again. Thanks! So, a question about Projects. Does the chat reference ONLY the uploaded text or is the uploaded text AND Claude's own wider database?
Hi Jason, I subscribed earlier this year and i'm enjoying your vids on AI, thank you. I started my first project with Claude and a funny thing happened. Later I began a new chat and Claude acted dumb, never heard of my project or any project and suggested I might be thinking of another AI. It was annoying, I'd uploaded several files and wondered if they were lost. Once I found the problem, it was obvious - I hadn't begun a new chat - IN THE PROJECT. I think 'Projects' should be a visible window rather than one revealed on hover, unless I'm the only dumb user in the universe. Something I still don't know how to do is to connect Claude to your recommended Novelcrafter, have you got a vid on that subject? Thanks again
Can I create a .txt document with specific instructions on how I want a story to be written, such as having the dialogues in bold within quotation marks, numbering the scenes, giving a dramatic tone to the dialogues, etc., and have this applied to all future stories? Just like the new GPT-4o memory does ?
This is great content. One suggestion ... stop jumping back and forth between your talking and the information slides. I'm a newbee who's just getting familiar with the platform and I have to go back and forth to tie what you're saying with the written bullets, etc. ... I'd keep the slides up there all the time with you in the circle doing your teaching.
@@TheNerdyNovelist oh I get it. I thought I was missing something. That makes sense. So hypothetically I could still use Claude on the side while writing novel crafter, and they’re the same in regard to its intelligence.
So claude 3.5 Sonnet is not the most advanced Claude model, that would be Opus, but they are both extremely advanced and most recent version of models designed to accomplish different things. Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Well-suited for a variety of enterprise applications where a balance of performance, speed, and cost-effectiveness is needed. It's also ideal for tasks involving code generation, reasoning, and safety-critical applications. Claude Opus: Best suited for highly complex tasks that demand deep understanding, advanced reasoning, and the ability to generate nuanced content. It's perfect for research, creative writing, and tackling challenges that require exceptional comprehension and fluency. While I have tested both for my writing and would not choose either, if you must choose between only them, then I would choose Opus. Also, in my experience, I would never use any of the free versions of anything if you plan on publishing what you are writing. They are not using the same version of a particular model for the free versions. Basically no matter whether you are in the claude tree or not, the free versions are generally going to be horrible. You definitely get what you pay for. The way I write, I am pushing vast amounts of text through any model constantly, and I need consistent tone, with text that I don't have to remove large quantities of adjectives or exposition. That is going to push you to Gemini Advanced which is currently using 1.5 Pro. I would add that if you intend on translating your book and don't have the $2500 per language to pay for it, Gemini is excellent at translation. I wish they would use it for Google Translate. I don't recommend constantly switching between types of models, nor is is wise to have it write something, and then pick and choose which parts you will improve. Readers will definitely think multiple writers wrote it. I was in a meeting recently with several prolific readers and it was one of their biggest complaints about many ebooks, actually it was full derision. It's best to fully write what you are going to write, then have the AI take over. If you want changes, you need to collaborate with the AI to make those changes so the whole thing doesn't become schizophrenic. The only exception to this I would make are love scenes. If you are doing love scenes, AI in all its forms is horrible at this. You will want to do the extra work of transitioning in some way to the love scene, and then fully write the love scene yourself. The best thing will be to switch to first person, this usually effectively masks the fact that you have entirely changed from a collaborated voice to a single voice. AI are also censored to the point where they are going to turn it into a Victorian nightmare anyway.
@@blakeceres Not for writing. Don't get me wrong, both of them are like asking a second year English major to write for you. It may depend on your depth and style of writing. i.e. specifically what you are asking it to do.
@@ariesmarsexpress You're the first person I've heard make this claim. To be clear, I DEFINITELY expect 3.5 Opus to be better, when it is released, but unless something changed in the last 72 hours I don't think that has happened yet. Can you give an example of something 3.5 Sonnet is worse at than 3.0 Opus? I can go try it for myself :)
@@LucTaylor I may run my entire manuscript through Opus 3.5 to see what it does. I am unlikely to switch to it, but I like to keep up with them because I am also an IT architect that works on creating different forms of AI models (not LLMs). Sonnet is an LLM that we will likely start using in production soon. We have to see just how consistent it really is.
I love Claude! I use MaxAI and have them all at my fingertips but Claude is my go to. Gemini and chat gpt both refused to translate an Arabic RUclips video title. The entire video was in English but it refused bc it determined it to be inflammatory. This will make the language models under Biden's command not much better than Google search.
That version chart is false. I signed up for the free version. I got blocked before barely any chatting. What a total lie. Video says hope I'm not confusing you. It's clearly extremely confusing. Nobody knows what any of it means. The start just says family of models. As far as I recall there's a server in Washington state made by Bill Gates that contains the computer. So I can't tell what is being referred to here. If it's a different computer somewhere else or multiple different computers with these 3 different LLMS. There's context to anything being explained here. It seems as if the difference only has to do with smarter/slower vs stupider/faster. Which would mean that they're the same intelligence except for taking more time to process for more accurate response outputs. In fact, I'm probably ahead of most viewers because I actually have some understanding of LLM and the giant computer/server in Washington. Most users don't know what that means and this video gives no courtesy of explaining anything. Which will indeed cause confusion. Users cannot make a decision without understanding how LLMs in general update and improve. Or specific ones. Not to be confused with customization/adaptation to user preferences which is still a feature of a current model. But how the actual model improves for all. The current notion is real time. As it interacts with millions of users, it learns from all the conversations and improves in real time.
Claude would NOT work because it will not generate any sort of violence, military or other parts they deem negative actions, as needed. So many screenplays have violence. Any suggestions what I can use.
I get that you love Novel Crafter, and every video you make on writing novels with Claude seems to include an ad for it. I think your viewers would benefit from benefit from you highlighting and drawing out the full potential of Claude instead pivoting to the beloved Novel Crafter. Maybe it's an inefficient use of your efforts. Maybe Projects are losing proposition for novel writing - a trap. I don't know, but since no one has taken it on and proven the value other than for small bodies of work, I wonder. Certainly, I've not see any attempt to Project 75,000 words, if that's even possible. Have you considered using Projects with novel writing to see if it's viable? Everyone goes straight to blog posts and I find that annoying when I am feeling a Novel is a project more so than a blog post is. And - yes, I am aware of the storage limits within Projects. I feed Claude Projects chapters six, seven, eight 3,000-word chapters, and character biographies, the world setting, outlines, etc., aiming for giving Claude a way to keep my story straight without having to refeed it chapters in repetition. I give it special instructions. It's not bad. I wonder if using projects is keeping my usage limits down too - unsure. My challenge to you: I'd like to see you do a video that does a deep dive into Projects that shows writers how to maximize the results using just Claude, build on what I'm doing without using Novel Crafter, openrouter.ai or other tools. I ask for this because you have your finger of the pulse of this product and are well positioned flesh out Claude + Projects to get the most of it with novel without confusing the viewer with extraneous visits/ comparisons and sidebars into other products. ...stay on point, without the tangents into other products. I'm too easily confused, need things tied into a bow. Anyway, I love your content, and I am subscribed, etc. ~regards
This video is for total Claude newbies. If you haven't seen other Claude videos you'll be happy with this video.
Just wanted to let you know, you are one of the main reason I got pro in Claude, well, it's also a great program. Keep up the great work.
Sonnet 3.5 is my favorite for writing prose from my beats, however when I put my latest book into Autocrit to edit it (which I do three chapters at a time)-holy moly, Sonnet 3.5 used the word ‘SLIGHTLY’ a whopping 112 times in the first 3 chapters. Everything my characters did-they did it SLIGHTLY. It was so damn funny, but aggravating, too. It really overloaded the amount of revisions I had to do to fix it. I definitely need to tweak Sonnet’s word usage penalty especially since I had included instructions to omit adverbs!
Yes. I’ve also noticed that it constantly gives me lines about the sun or sky
💪 Absolute gold mine for anyone looking to 10x their AI game. Here's what actually matters for builders:
Projects Feature (14:58) - You can upload entire documents/books as context for AI to reference. Game-changer for content creation and research. No more context limitations.
Prompt Generator Hack (12:45) - Anthropic's console has a built-in prompt generator that turns basic prompts into pro-level instructions. Instant upgrade to your AI outputs.
XML Tags Strategy (21:44) - Using XML tags in your prompts (like and ) makes Claude way more precise. Perfect for systematizing your AI workflows.
Pro tip: The free tier is solid, but if you're serious about scaling, the $20 Pro version unlocks the real power with higher limits and advanced features.
Anyone here actually tried Claude for building systems in their business? Drop your results below 👇
Curious if this AI platform will allow a book to be written from a dissertation
my sister and i using claude for works and acads purposes, and use Undetectable AI to refines claude's ai generated text. now im happy to share here that Undetectable AI’s latest feature is an AI essay writer that makes text sound more human.
I consider myself 'pretty good' at this, by now, but I still learned a few new things from watching this video. I've been putting the "long" data at the end of the prompt (shame) and not been using the documents like I should.
Also I've never played with the tool for prompt engineering.
Also I'd never heard of fractal prompting.
Jolly good :P
I've been using Claude Pro for awhile and consider myself to be quite adept. I didn't know about the recommendations from Anthropic, though, so I appreciate your highlighting them. Overall, your course is great for people wanting to improve their experience with Claude.
Currently Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Haiku chatbot on the free plan has been offline for almsot 24 hours (due to high demand, apparently)
Claude Opus completely shuts me down after a few chats, and I'm a Pro paying subscriber!
I cannot download the files in a user-friendly format. TSX doesn't work anywhere or can be converted to a PDF or PNG, I wanted to create some dashboards and charts, but I cannot open them or use them because of the TSX format, any tips for this?
This is absolutely awesome and you are gorgeous. Thank you for presenting this much needed.😊
I have been using Claude 3.5 sonnet a lot lately to write my first novel. I have found a way that works really well. Only issue I have is hitting the limit on the pro plan and it not wanting to write certain things like violence.
Having the same issue with the violence part. I can't find a work around
I hope I'm not confusing you... Yes, yes you are. You could say the name and the tier it is. I don't have the list of models in front of me.
How you created book cover shown here as examples?
Does the prompt generator also work with other LLMS?
Love the synergy aspect. Allows me to be more creative, with an "assist button". Feed it a rough draft and have it evaluate what I wrote for emotion, clarity, etc. I read the responsed, sort through and pick the best suggestions and rewrite those to get the improvement I'm looking for. I am synergizing Claude efforts with mine to get a combined result. Love that.
How to use Claude/other AIs to replace editors in the book writing process? Editing is the key series of tasks in fiction book writing I need to solve: Editorial Assessment/Content Editing, Copy Editing, Proofreading, and maybe even Fact-Checking (for non-fiction). How to handle 60k-100k word novels for the higher level editing of plot/character-arc analysis when limited to chapter by chapter uploads? Would the prompt start with "Imagine you are a top New York publishing house editing team ... "
Great video again. Thanks! So, a question about Projects. Does the chat reference ONLY the uploaded text or is the uploaded text AND Claude's own wider database?
Hi Jason, I subscribed earlier this year and i'm enjoying your vids on AI, thank you. I started my first project with Claude and a funny thing happened. Later I began a new chat and Claude acted dumb, never heard of my project or any project and suggested I might be thinking of another AI. It was annoying, I'd uploaded several files and wondered if they were lost. Once I found the problem, it was obvious - I hadn't begun a new chat - IN THE PROJECT.
I think 'Projects' should be a visible window rather than one revealed on hover, unless I'm the only dumb user in the universe. Something I still don't know how to do is to connect Claude to your recommended Novelcrafter, have you got a vid on that subject? Thanks again
Thank you!!
Can I create a .txt document with specific instructions on how I want a story to be written, such as having the dialogues in bold within quotation marks, numbering the scenes, giving a dramatic tone to the dialogues, etc., and have this applied to all future stories? Just like the new GPT-4o memory does ?
Use 'Projects'
ebooksbyai AI fixes this. Everything about Claude in 2024.
Thank you 🙏
Love you're content. Can you please do a master class/ full course video on how to use and take full advantage of Draft to Digital? Please 🙏🏼🥺🙏🏼
I’ve got it on my list don’t worry. Might be a while as a few others take priority.
as I'm paying for it, which one would you recommend for writing? Sonnet 3.5 or Opus?
Is Claude Sonnet or Opus better at outlining and doing beats than the new ChatGPT 1.0? I understand it is better at prose.
Good video.. but felt some of ot is about advertising your book
This is great content. One suggestion ... stop jumping back and forth between your talking and the information slides. I'm a newbee who's just getting familiar with the platform and I have to go back and forth to tie what you're saying with the written bullets, etc. ... I'd keep the slides up there all the time with you in the circle doing your teaching.
please create video about writing short story (4000-6000 words) using claude. thanks
Thanks! But is the claude $5 free trial offer gone?
What would you say are some key differences in prompting techniques from Claude different from ChatGPT?
Is Claude good for writing RUclips scripts?
Awesome. Thank you! Can I use totally use Claude as a standalone novel writing tool or do I really need novelcrafter?
Stand alone
Very useful
wow. Thank you.
Can someone explain to me why you would use AI in Novel Crafter when you have to pay using credits vs Claude/GPT only paying monthly?
It is usually cheaper
@@TheNerdyNovelist oh I get it. I thought I was missing something. That makes sense. So hypothetically I could still use Claude on the side while writing novel crafter, and they’re the same in regard to its intelligence.
So claude 3.5 Sonnet is not the most advanced Claude model, that would be Opus, but they are both extremely advanced and most recent version of models designed to accomplish different things.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Well-suited for a variety of enterprise applications where a balance of performance, speed, and cost-effectiveness is needed. It's also ideal for tasks involving code generation, reasoning, and safety-critical applications.
Claude Opus: Best suited for highly complex tasks that demand deep understanding, advanced reasoning, and the ability to generate nuanced content. It's perfect for research, creative writing, and tackling challenges that require exceptional comprehension and fluency.
While I have tested both for my writing and would not choose either, if you must choose between only them, then I would choose Opus. Also, in my experience, I would never use any of the free versions of anything if you plan on publishing what you are writing. They are not using the same version of a particular model for the free versions. Basically no matter whether you are in the claude tree or not, the free versions are generally going to be horrible. You definitely get what you pay for.
The way I write, I am pushing vast amounts of text through any model constantly, and I need consistent tone, with text that I don't have to remove large quantities of adjectives or exposition. That is going to push you to Gemini Advanced which is currently using 1.5 Pro. I would add that if you intend on translating your book and don't have the $2500 per language to pay for it, Gemini is excellent at translation. I wish they would use it for Google Translate.
I don't recommend constantly switching between types of models, nor is is wise to have it write something, and then pick and choose which parts you will improve. Readers will definitely think multiple writers wrote it. I was in a meeting recently with several prolific readers and it was one of their biggest complaints about many ebooks, actually it was full derision. It's best to fully write what you are going to write, then have the AI take over. If you want changes, you need to collaborate with the AI to make those changes so the whole thing doesn't become schizophrenic. The only exception to this I would make are love scenes. If you are doing love scenes, AI in all its forms is horrible at this. You will want to do the extra work of transitioning in some way to the love scene, and then fully write the love scene yourself. The best thing will be to switch to first person, this usually effectively masks the fact that you have entirely changed from a collaborated voice to a single voice. AI are also censored to the point where they are going to turn it into a Victorian nightmare anyway.
3.5 Sonnet is more advanced than Opus as of right now.
@@blakeceres Not for writing. Don't get me wrong, both of them are like asking a second year English major to write for you. It may depend on your depth and style of writing. i.e. specifically what you are asking it to do.
@@ariesmarsexpress You're the first person I've heard make this claim. To be clear, I DEFINITELY expect 3.5 Opus to be better, when it is released, but unless something changed in the last 72 hours I don't think that has happened yet.
Can you give an example of something 3.5 Sonnet is worse at than 3.0 Opus? I can go try it for myself :)
@@LucTaylor I may run my entire manuscript through Opus 3.5 to see what it does. I am unlikely to switch to it, but I like to keep up with them because I am also an IT architect that works on creating different forms of AI models (not LLMs). Sonnet is an LLM that we will likely start using in production soon. We have to see just how consistent it really is.
I love Claude! I use MaxAI and have them all at my fingertips but Claude is my go to. Gemini and chat gpt both refused to translate an Arabic RUclips video title. The entire video was in English but it refused bc it determined it to be inflammatory. This will make the language models under Biden's command not much better than Google search.
That version chart is false. I signed up for the free version. I got blocked before barely any chatting. What a total lie.
Video says hope I'm not confusing you. It's clearly extremely confusing. Nobody knows what any of it means. The start just says family of models. As far as I recall there's a server in Washington state made by Bill Gates that contains the computer. So I can't tell what is being referred to here. If it's a different computer somewhere else or multiple different computers with these 3 different LLMS. There's context to anything being explained here. It seems as if the difference only has to do with smarter/slower vs stupider/faster. Which would mean that they're the same intelligence except for taking more time to process for more accurate response outputs. In fact, I'm probably ahead of most viewers because I actually have some understanding of LLM and the giant computer/server in Washington. Most users don't know what that means and this video gives no courtesy of explaining anything. Which will indeed cause confusion.
Users cannot make a decision without understanding how LLMs in general update and improve. Or specific ones. Not to be confused with customization/adaptation to user preferences which is still a feature of a current model. But how the actual model improves for all. The current notion is real time. As it interacts with millions of users, it learns from all the conversations and improves in real time.
I found it completely useless. The free version although restricted performs much better that the paid version
Claude would NOT work because it will not generate any sort of violence, military or other parts they deem negative actions, as needed. So many screenplays have violence. Any suggestions what I can use.
Try Mistral.
I have pro, I get times out several times a day. Teams is $30 per person, minimum of 5 people. So not a real choice
I get that you love Novel Crafter, and every video you make on writing novels with Claude seems to include an ad for it. I think your viewers would benefit from benefit from you highlighting and drawing out the full potential of Claude instead pivoting to the beloved Novel Crafter.
Maybe it's an inefficient use of your efforts. Maybe Projects are losing proposition for novel writing - a trap. I don't know, but since no one has taken it on and proven the value other than for small bodies of work, I wonder. Certainly, I've not see any attempt to Project 75,000 words, if that's even possible.
Have you considered using Projects with novel writing to see if it's viable? Everyone goes straight to blog posts and I find that annoying when I am feeling a Novel is a project more so than a blog post is. And - yes, I am aware of the storage limits within Projects.
I feed Claude Projects chapters six, seven, eight 3,000-word chapters, and character biographies, the world setting, outlines, etc., aiming for giving Claude a way to keep my story straight without having to refeed it chapters in repetition. I give it special instructions. It's not bad. I wonder if using projects is keeping my usage limits down too - unsure.
My challenge to you: I'd like to see you do a video that does a deep dive into Projects that shows writers how to maximize the results using just Claude, build on what I'm doing without using Novel Crafter, openrouter.ai or other tools.
I ask for this because you have your finger of the pulse of this product and are well positioned flesh out Claude + Projects to get the most of it with novel without confusing the viewer with extraneous visits/ comparisons and sidebars into other products. ...stay on point, without the tangents into other products. I'm too easily confused, need things tied into a bow. Anyway, I love your content, and I am subscribed, etc. ~regards