Bmw 530i xDrive vs Audi A6 TDI Quattro - 4x4 test on rollers
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- Join us on Facebook: / stacjakontrolitrakcji
Follow us on Instagram: / 4x4_tests_on_rollers
Test on rollers (rear, side, diagonal, three rollers):
Bmw 530i 2.0 xDrive (2018)
vs
Audi A6 2.0 TDI Quattro (2016)
#duszaniespokojna #quattro #xdrive
Bmw 530d xDrive (2016) vs Audi A6 2.0 TDI Quattro (2016): ruclips.net/video/yf370um_7w8/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/R-nZCFzbiAA/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/Wu72tAG2IWQ/видео.html enjoy 😀👍🏻
thanks. have you got access to m430i/m340d m40i/m40d s4 rs4 sq5?
@@doctor_who1 All up to volunteers.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers i vounteer in new zealand! how do i get the rollers here?
This is one of the better tests I've seen. When you test in "real world conditions", people complain that there are too many variables. When you test in controlled conditions such as in this video, people complain that it's an inaccurate representation of real driving conditions; there's no helping these people. This video provides an enormous amount of information to those able to interpret the results, so I thank you for taking the time to make and edit the info, and providing the graphic representation of what is happening. 10/10. I don't think the video supports that either system is "superior", it simply shows how the two systems work similarly, and where there are differences.
Thanks. And indeed I am not showing which system is better or worse. These are comparisons, not competitions.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers too many of these videos are misinterpreted or misrepresented to support faulty conclusions. I like your method of showing repeatable, objective tests without being misleading. I did some 4wd system testing on my channel in off-road conditions, but there were too many variables to make them truly useful, mostly just entertaining. I really like your system as it eliminates most external inconsistent factors. Keep up the great work!
@@willohwhite2372 Thanks again :-) Join me on Facebook :-)
And there you have it!
No fanboy video with drifting Audis and BMWs with summer tires stuck in snow...
This is objective.
Quattro is NOT the best.
Thanks for that video!
Ayy there is no best both are good
This test covers only some parts of what an awd system should do. In this test at any time you are having some wheels with 100% traction and the others with 0% traction. BMW having a more electrical AWD system can split better the torque between wheels. Audi for C7 has a mechanic AWD system so it’s not so precise in this test. But what happens when you have partial traction on all 4 wheels, like on rain or mud or snow? This is actually the most common situation.
Yea, but this things it's very hard to test them and show in a video...
In snow some wheels Are often on blanc ice, which is pretty much rollers. This test is very accurate
"But what happens when you have partial traction on all 4 wheels, like on rain or mud or snow?"
Well then BMW is better as it gives you more fun as their AWD system is RWD based and it goes sideways a bit :3
Both Xdrive and quattro are great
I have a XDrive. It's doesnt't matter for me XDrive or Quattro. Both is good.
Владимир Козлов Yeap and this is correct statement.
THAT'S THE SPIRIT!
Any AWD is good. Just bmw does it better is the point of this video.
Sumwon Tufaq You clearly haven’t tried a Hyundai Tucson with AWD 😂
Late see x dive after 100.000 services are full of broken x- drive
Nareszcie porządny test i wszelkie wątpliwości zostały rozwiane. Na YT jest pełno beznadziejnych filmów pokazujących jak BMW się ślizga na śniegu a AUDI rusza normalnie, tyle że taki test na śniegu pokazuje przyczepność opon a nie działanie napędów. Ten test pokazuje prawdziwe działanie napędu a nie przyczepność opon na śniegu. Pewnie będzie pełno hejtu ze strony fanów Audi pod moim komentarzem ale nic nie dadzą te komentarze ponieważ film pokazuje który napęd jest lepszy, co nie znaczy że quattro jest złe 😉
Wreszcie jakiś fajny test napędów. dzięki !
Jan S Zapraszam na mój kanał, jest tego sporo ;)
to ktory wygral?
@@as34 To nie są zawody, tu nie ma wygranych i przegranych 🙂
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers pocos jednak jest ten wyscig zbrojen no nie chyba po to zeby bylo gorzej wiecdalej pytam ktory naped lepszy w tym tescie2, sprawa piewszy przypadek w tescie rolki z tylu i bmw ma naturalny naped na tyl a audi na przod nie zauwazyle zeby byly rolki pod przednia osia na oba kola.... .
@@as34 Kontrola trakcji, która jest podstawą w tym teście, lepiej działa w Bmw. Napędy są po prostu inne, zależy kto co lubi i przede wszystkim do czego potrzebuje.
Co do drugiej kwestii - test Audi z rolkami pod przednią osią znajdziesz np. tutaj: ruclips.net/video/JU2fJN8dbWU/видео.html
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Limited slip diff
Is the answer for you
nice Bmw 530i xDrive 2017 model year and Audi a6 quattro 2011 model year .... waiting for test Bmw g30 vs Audi a6 c8
Both were on sale at the same time.
Lmao How do you know the BMW is from 2017?? You can smell the year through the screen?
There was a video with the Q8 and was the same trash 😂😂
Agree with the results you Audi fanbooiii 😂😂😂
@@worldisawesome6789 he means that g30 was introduced in 2017 and Audi a6 c7 was introduced in 2011 so the BMW's F10 generation is opponent for this Audi
Both did a good job. Torsen in Audi was just the best in T1 type era where you could manually lock the rear diff :-) long ago...
I thought Torsen is not lockable or adjustable, it's kinda you get what you get. I like it though for being pure mechanical system without extra maintenance and with potential of being strong and withstand constant abuse.
@@S1massYou are right, torsen itself is not lockable. However there are cars where a locking mechanism is added, for example Mitsubishi L200.
Not a fan of either, but clearly BMW has the better system. If you watch the posters other video comparing VW and Audi (both VAG products) it's clear that their system has trouble or is incapable of transferring power from one side of the axle to the other. X-Drive, at least in this model here can transfer power in such a manner, perhaps with the help of LSDs
LSD is optional for g30 530ix and it's rarely picked by customers so honestly I doubt that this particular car is equipped with it. Also bear in mind that you can equip only rear wheels with LSD, there is no LSD option for front wheels in 530ix.
In this video it looks more like traction control did the job to get BMW out of troubles.
There was a time when Audi quattro was untouchable, not anymore. Both did a pretty good job tought!
2016 and 2018
its all about esp mate.
quattro has 3 diffs in REAL situations is better.
bmw use a system like haldex (esp biased)
@@rubenoliveira4094 Lol, what's the difference? For 2016 Audi is the same AWD system as for 2018 Audi
@@latviangang7242 quattro gave been changed to use electrical clutch few years ago. more modern audi would do same thing as bmw did (so faster and mo efficient power vectoring to only wheel with grip), but in reality in snow or muddy conditions, this usually not mean ot would be that better if any.
@@turbisios BMW g30 has multiclutch system to engage front wheels if needed. So in BMW you have 2 "real" diffs and one multiclutch controlled by computer. ESP goes to the action mostly when there's speed difference between two wheels on the same axis. I prefer BMW in REAL situations as it's RWD based and it goes sideways easily which is fun to drive and involving.
A lot of people will say that XDrive is better than Quattro based on videos like this. The big difference is that XDrive uses a lot of electronics to control the system, while Quattro doesn't use any. And by electronics I don't mean ESP or something like that. XDrive uses electronics to shift the power between the wheels, the center diff. is electronically controlled, while Quattro is pure mechanical, and it needs more wheel spin to react/change and shift power because of the mechanics. Which is better?! Difficult to say, if the electronics fail in the XDrive?! Quattro's reputation isn't for nothing....
dimekoza Everything's correct, but Audi already started to abandon mechanical systems...
Wrong, Quatro is just a marketing name, just like xDrive. Sometimes it's Haldex, sometimes it's Torsen. What you said might have been true 15 years ago.
+Mike Marillion Haldex is on the smaller cars A3, A1,Q3,Q1.. the rest have a permanent awd system, some with torsen, others with a crown gear.
So what’s the matter ?? Better is better no matter what the fuck they use electric or mechanic !!
+jenGD3 you cant say that it's better based on this test. There are manny different situations in the real world that this test doesn't represent
I always thought quattro was better but this test proves otherwise.
Bmw ftw
Audi fans are triggered
@@krisg822 This particular A6 has "real Quattro".
@@krisg822 I'm sorry but I don't remember the discussion. However there is no doubt that any A6 C7 has real Quattro. So is A6 C8 (3.0 TDI) and roller tests clearly show that. The only doubt is if it is torsen or crown gear.
@@krisg822 You really have to check on Audi website what's hidden under the name "self-locking center differential" ;)
Sport differential wouldn't make much difference - it is open.
@@krisg822 Nope. Self locking center differential is torsen Type 3 (helical) with additional friction plates to overcome well known torsen drawback.
Sport differential has two clutches which only change the gearing in rear diff to overspeed outer wheel. No locking function, no limited slip function. Just overspeeding.
@@krisg822 Imho diff lockers in passenger cars doesn't make any sense, 1st generation of Quattro had two of them and it was ridiculous, that's good for offroaders. But center torsen with friction/locking plates and rear diff which corrects understeer seems to be great option for onroad car.
So the xDrive is better than Quattro...
What's up with this war all the time. Both pretty decent and gonna help when needed
Thanks for this hot comparison! I love your channel! 😁
Quattro is a mechanical system while xDrive is electronic actuated. xDrive would respond faster to slippage but less predictable in power delivery than quattro. It really depends on your preference.
Trades46 Nowadays at least a half of Quattro is electronic actuated...
duszaniespokojna after the RS5 with the new crown gear differential yes. However that system would perform just as if not better than xDrive shown here.
Trades46 What new crown gear diff do you mean? The one I remember was from 2010 I think.
duszaniespokojna Audi isn't too clear cut here, but I remember reading all RS cars & high powered longitudinal engine models now have a Crown Gear centre diff in place of the Torsen unit since 2010. All lower powered and transverse systems now have a part time Haldex derived system in a bid to save fuel (and costs), now christened under the name "ultra".
Trades46 A6 from this test also has crown gear. Some other models have torsen, but not the classic one, current version has CSM name as I remember. Haldex and Ultra are similar, but not the same, if they get good software they can do much more than torsen or crown gear.
both are good but X-Drive is best 😍😍😍
Alex Rudaj yout mum is the best by friend 😂
Alex Rudaj fuck you
on BMW he push the throttle slowly and on audi he pushed hard the throttle . If u push hard the throttle on bmw u never go away!
serlGlent Really? Then why this one went away with no problems? ruclips.net/video/bvvEU_eXNTE/видео.html
BMW Ultimate Driving MACHINE #BestCarsOfAllTimes
Let’s all just agree that 4Matic has the dumbest name of the 3
But works the best with less effort as for Audi the guys just floors the pedal and barely gets out
I ten ból dupy Audi fanboy'ów, bo napęd BMW wygrał z quattro. Jedyną wymówką to się srają o jakiś śnieg, bo innego komentarza nie mają XD Prawda boli najbardziej, że xdrive jest teraz jednym z najlepszych napędów jeżeli chodzi o skuteczność na drodze. Dla ciekawości gościu, który kiedyś projektował quattro, teraz projektuje xdrive w BMW.
Sebeniczツ Oj żeby tylko xdrive... Nie jestem ani fanem, ani anty-fanem Quattro, jako autor kanału patrzę na temat obiektywnie. Producenci tak poszli do przodu w tym temacie, że Audi ledwo nadąża. A jeśli ktoś ma choć troszkę wiedzy technicznej to wie, że Quattro nigdy nie było i nadal nie jest niczym wyjątkowym. Natomiast ich marketing - majstersztyk, top level.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers Śmieszne, rolki to jest wszystko? Tutaj BMW miało lepiej zaprogramowane ESP, i ewentualnie kierowcę. W normalnych warunkach jestem ciekaw jak BMW da radę. Po za tym czemu 3 rolki nie były na równi pochyłej (pod górkę) - jestem ciekaw czy poza G-klasą cokolwiek z 4x4 da radę...
To Quattro nie jest tak wyczynowe co nie zmienia faktu, że w prawdziwych warunkach jak np. zima deklasuje konkurencję. I to nie jest marketing, tu jest stały napęd a nie dołączany (pozdrawiam posiadaczy nowego XC90)
@@adif199370 A kto twierdzi, że rolki to wszystko?
Deklasuje? Niby jak, skoro Audi nigdy nie skonstruowało żadnego autorskiego napędu. Stosują te same rozwiązania, co konkurencja. Stałe, dołączane i odłączane, w zależności od modelu, wersji, rocznika etc. Bardzo dobre napędy, ale w niczym nie wyprzedzające konkurencji.
Co do równi pochyłej - wyjazd z tych rolek jest jak podjazd na krawężnik (nie są płaskie), znacznie trudniejszy niż podjazd pod górkę. I jest wiele filmów, gdzie wiele samochodów bez problemów daje radę na 'rolkowych' rampach.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers Co do autorstwa tego nie wiem. Skoro autor wie jakie rodzaje napędów stosuje Audi to czy należy ją atakować bo stosuje napędy które mogą przenosić stosunkowo duży moment obrotowy na poszczególne z kół (mechaniczne połączenia)? W najnowszym Volvo XC90 mamy z tyłu jedynie 80 konny silnik elektryczny który ma w razie potrzeby dopomóc napędowi na przód - nie sądzę aby to było dobre.
Do tego dodam na obronę Audi kilka testów:
-test AutoŚwiat gdzie A4 i Q5 z quattro były nieco lepsze na śniegu od BMW, pokonane zostały przez skutery śnieżne gąsienicowe
-topgear Q7 vs XC90 wyraźnie widać przewagę napędu Audi w zakrętach, po prostu świetnie łapie przyczepność
-był też test rosyjski na rolkach na 1 oś (pod górkę Q3 i X1, gdzie po raz kolejny Audi udało się wygrać
@@adif199370 Nie bardzo rozumiem. Jeśli zarzut atakowania kierujesz do mnie, to przeczytaj proszę moje komentarze powyżej. Przyglądam się temu obiektywnie, zwracam uwagę, jakie rozwiązania są stosowane przez różne marki itd. I osłabia mnie każdy fanatyzm, niezależnie, czy dotyczy quattro, xdrive, 4matic czy napędu łady nivy.
Co do XC90, to piszesz o wersji hybrydowej. Nie wiem, czy firmie Volvo udało się to efektywnie wysterować, póki co to raczkująca technologia. Natomiast wersje spalinowe mają Haldexa V, tego samego, co w wielu samochodach Audi (choć na pewno inaczej wysterowanego).
A skoro już wymieniasz jakieś testy - stwierdzenie "A4 i Q5 z quattro" nic nie znaczy. Quattro to tylko nazwa marketingowa, pod którą kryją się różne rozwiązania, więc albo należy sprecyzować, o jakich dokładnie napędach mowa, albo pozostać na poziomie ofiar marketingu i po prostu wierzyć w ich wyjątkowość bez weryfikowania.
Lol, having to spin for that long to finally have the computer figure it out to get traction would mean having to get a shovel to dig yourself out. Trying to cheap out $100 by using open diffs and using software is really disappointing.
I got stuck with one tire in sand last week in my nissan xterra in 4wd. Turns out I was supposed to gas it and wait for the computer to figure it out and risk getting stuck. In my older truck, it used a clutch style LSD that worked proactively and I never had anything like that happen. It just worked, because nissan hadn't cheaped out yet by trying to use software to overcome crappier hardware.
Quite eye opening. Quattro's longstanding reputation definite needs to be questioned at this point.
Lox Lover where?
You're an idiot if you believe everything you see on TV or RUclips
Real world performance speaks louder than these test . Maybe bmw did some upgrades ?
Quattro is now just marketing name for AWD. Torsen is gone. ruclips.net/video/VjwYNvsJ-OM/видео.html
Put them in real world and you would laugh at this comparison
I to jest test a nie te gdzie pokazują bmw zakopane w śniegu czy piachu i audi które przejeżdża po prostej drodze gdzie jest 2 cm śniegu
dokładnie tak
Great test 👍
Jānis Dimitrijevs Thanks, more tests coming soon!
Petrol vs diesel,great test...
@@alexalexandru5028 And what is the problem with that?
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers idk,maybe audi have more torque because it has a diesel engine
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers if it was a correct test ,compare 2 cars as closely as possible,like 520d xdrive (190hp) with a6 2.0 tdi quattro (190hp)
Вот это по честному )))
Где там по честному? Бензин против дизеля
@@Oblomoff_fan Turbo benzin.
@@unisten Audi 2016 (2011-2018). Bmw 2018 (2018-). Both cars were direct competitors for over a year. Here is 2016 vs 2016: ruclips.net/video/yf370um_7w8/видео.html
Bazujac jedynie na tescie napedu wyraznie wygrywa Xdrive. Jednak jesli przenalizowac stopien skomplikowania mechanizmu w bmw i audi oraz wziac pod uwage, ze jest to najnowszy model bmw seri5 kontra audi a6 ktore zadebiutowalo ok 7 lat temu to wynik testu juz nie jest tak oczywisty. Audi jest samochodem prostszym konstrukcyjnie (chociazby sam naped) niz bmw. Kolejny plus na korzysc audi, ze jako samochod z drugiej reki jest obecnie o wiele bardziej przystepny cenowo a w codziennym uzytkowaniu oba napedy sprawdza sie bardzo podobnie w kazdej pogodzie. Jakbymkasa nie grala roli to wybralbym bmw xdrive ale rozsadek podpowiada starsze mniej skomplikowane i sporo tansze audi a6 quattro. Pozdrawiam.
bmw rwd is best.extra pair of drive wheels is just better.
The BEST for slide in to snow lmao 🤣🤣 quattro power baby a mechanical awd not electricly blocked. mechanical 🖕🏽😉
@@denvergonzalez9031 Mechanical awd was good 30 years ago, now Quattro is pure shit if you compare it to the others
@GT Suryateja Yeah, maybe first you should drive any of them, then return and write comments
As an audi quattro owner, its hilarious to see the audi fanboi's try to deny the fact that BMW was the clear winner in this test. Modern quattro systems are junk compared to older style systems when other companies technology was not as advanced as audi was. Audi's latest quattro system is bulky, expensive, and relies too heavily on computer control compared to older systems.
robsp32 Quattro was never more advanced than other awd systems. They just had/have great marketing. In fact, they were technically retarded just from the beginning. Open diffs or torsen weren't any technological advancement.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers why did you call it retarded
BMW WINEr 🔥🇦🇱
My shqipez
People who say Quattro is leaps and bounds ahead of X-Drive, need to watch this video
Dźwięk pracy silnika Audi jest gorszy od nowych traktorów, to jest jakaś kpina aby dziś tak silnik pracował. Niech te dziady posłuchają diesla Hdi/Dci czy Diesla BMW.
So xdrive is slightly better for certain applications. Just as I thought
xdrive is best and most advanced system on the planet thats fact !
xDrive the smartest.
If you want Audi, save money buy a Skoda!
Skoda and audi its almost The same car 😂 skoda have better prize. You' te right.
torsen > haldex. soryan paren'
exactly
1:30 Look bmw no problem, then look audi .......
Audi a4/s4 Dude, don't be pathetic with another ridiculous comment.
Testing and reality are different.
Same Same but different !
Well well
I think Audi lost on his game
Opps ! haters in 3 2 1...
Ganbala 0, -1, -2, -3...
ruclips.net/video/7QSbuAnXj_k/видео.html
Заяц Do you know what type of Quattro you linked?
yes 2018 bmw to a 2016 audi haha
Ganbala 3 2 1 you think bad
most people think Audi quattro is much better than xdrive and 4matic, but this clip is prove bmw xdrive is much better than quattro system.
X-drive быстрее соображает на доли секунды, чем Quattro
ruclips.net/video/O0W7PNmrCIw/видео.html
Ну на сухих тестах да, а вот реальное сравнение
На сухом асфальте с роликами не влияет не резина, не навык шофёра.
Сразу становится виден у кого потенциал больше.
@@user-my3ug3gt7k Эти тесты по крайней мере честны, и не являются рекламными роликами. Кватро переоцененный полный привод, адекватный человек это понимает
Xdrive number one!
my logo
u should consider that this is previous generation of audi a6 (c7) and the new generation of 5 series
Maks I get so many comments about it... Firstly - both cars were on sale at the same time. Secondly - many people comment that new quattro is not a real quattro, only old one is real. And better. So which should I use in your opinion?
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers would be still more fair with the new one but sure if it is not avalible its still nice to see the difference betwen the generations
xDrive for the win! 💪🏻
No need to talk trash about all different 4 wheel drive systems when you have not done some research. (ps: most youtube comparisations are not fair.. you see 4matic on Snow performing better then Quattro on Snow with Ice underneath..or other whey arround... Also Quattro vs X-drive where one with Winter tires pulling on snow with full traction vs other slipping arround and not going forward (Summer tires))
All 4wheel drive systems are pretty much good enough and will get you there.. Some are just stopping the slipping wheel faster and transfering power faster to the needed wheels.
To come to the point: Audi has finally recognized X-drive to be slightly better, so Audi applied the same techniek in 2015 on their Quattro.. Now at least we know Quattro & X-drive = SAME!
See link: ruclips.net/video/itsU5e4ZWJc/видео.html
For me, quattro died when the last S2 rolled off the assembly line in 1995.
WHY?
for me you are an idiot :)
@@jakaracman405 Kid
The Audi needs so much more gas to get of those rollers
You mean diesel? Lol
awds get so confused on rollers lol. isnt there a telemitry sensor they can use to eliminate that issue?
xDrive !
And the WINNER is......!!!!
BMW forever
Off topic!
I have an audi a3 2010 quattro with haldex and i read on internet and lot of people tell me its only two wheel drive most of the time, and only when I lost grip on front wheels i will have all 4 wheels working. But i have a problem with the drive shaft that caused a vibration when back wheels working, and any time I accelerate even on highway on dry, I feel that vibration s-o I know its working not only when i drive on snow or mud and I lost grip. Maybe on constant speed its only two wheels drive but then dont need the extra consuption. What I don't understand about my car and maybe somebody know its if i go down hill and there its ice, when my front wheels start to slip because of the engine brake, back wheels will be also engaged în the engine brake? ...Fun thing, I like to drive pretty fast and I like to try the car, and if I go constant with 80km/h în a curve that I know vere well, the car understeer (its an audi :)), but if I accelerate I can go with over 90km/h, and the car its perfectly balanced, not understeer, not oversteer, its really grip like crazy
There are free apps which show the lock up level of haldex, that's the best way to check what is it actually doing. I don't know if it's working during engine brake. But it's working for sure during acceleration, that's why car is better balanced.
The Problem is that the audi is from 2016 and from my knowledge they upgraded there quattro sytem lately.
F10 can kill this test easily
Не понял,что уже Икс драйв лучше кваттро?🤔
The BMW wins this cause the Quattro needs more Wheelspin. In Reality you wont really get in such a situation so both are fine.
Ha ha ha.. qoattro power 😂😂😂😂
Cool
BMW xDRIVE is the king, forget audi!!!
Made test on real snow, than we see what is better...
Mariusz KULKA quattro is better for snow,but xDrive is better on the track(cornering,handling on dry)
+1 Yeah, I see countless Audis work like a charm on snow while Xdrive BMW just get stuck. Hell, even videos where even old Audis pull stuck BMW (both RWD and AWD). There is Audis who pull 18 wheelers too ! Yep, 18 wheelers, try that with Xdrive or 4 matic !
uksazalenje there is two type's of Quatro, haldex or torsen. Torsen is King.
TimeTraveller GE C204 We are not buying bmw or audi for pulling 18wheelers :D
uksazalenje, of course but it just show how Quattro superior handling ability and resistance is :)
Oke take this: Both systems are good at doing their job. It's minor difference.Here is why quattro has upper hand ----> Quattro system is much more mechanical reliable on long term.Bmw is eletronic like quattro ultra computer controlled, Big thing is weight Xdrive is much heavy and complicate that is big minus Quattro is much lighter, and weight is important in car industry.
Stefan Ciganovic I guess weight is not more important than functionality. And electronical systems are in general more efficient than mechanical systems. Plus, the adjustment for such electronical systems is better to configurate and so it will be even better in future. Just wait, also Audi/Quattro GmbH will add some electronical components to their Quattro with time. You have to go for electronic, if you want technical advance.
Truth. Dude just be salty
Latvietis96 how much is old that rs7 ? M5 is brand new...
Brix07 Z you have fully eletric Quattro ultra absolutely same as newest in m5... you ll never have any problems with bormal quatrro bu Xdrive in used car can be headache... just saying
Nice comparison
Which system is the X drive using ,is it similar to Subaru's
Which 4 WHD layout is used by BMW?
Edu.G
xDrive is different from Subaru (Act-4), although they both use clutch pack. xDrive is rwd biased, rear axle is "the main one" while front is active. In Subaru it is the opposite.
Our new BMW X1 is 60% front and 40% rear :p Front-wheel based, it's a new platform for BMW in their future line-ups
QUATRO HAHAHAHAHAHA ;D
?
subaru's symetrical awd system beats them all in any condition, on any planet
Because?
Yes, and this test is useful because on my everyday commute I roll over rollers.
Tests on rollers vs real world situations: ruclips.net/video/926i0zqteXE/видео.html
Tests on rollers - WHAT DO THEY SHOW? How to interpret the results?: ruclips.net/video/ntxgFjaX9HM/видео.html
Those little audi fanboys just see what they wanna see in real subaru has the best 4x4
Xdrive better
uddhfhf
Pietro Bosco I don't think so.Check out bmw merc audi snow competition.
Facts
Hahaha....
Xdrive?serious?...lol..hahaha...quattro-best 4×4...
The 2.0 A6 is a front wheel drive for fuel economy, partial quattro when needed. It's haldex not torsen, xDrive is better than haldex but torsen is the best.
Haldex was never ever used in any A6, this is torsen here.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers I'm sure haldex is hydraulic clutch controlled when needed, torsen doesn't allow the back wheels to spin that much.
@@k222eev Check this video, all answers are there: ruclips.net/video/JV-72X8716c/видео.html
Thanks, too much electronics and clutches for me though in a A6 2.0 quattro, s-tronic, belt... I'll get a 520d xdrive that I can disable in the summer, no clutches, no belt, or just the rwd no headaches.
@@k222eev If you mean awd system - in A6 there is just torsen, no clutches while xDrive is entirely based on multiplate clutch-pack.
How was that with quattro is better? 😂😂😂
Haha true, I wonder if the m sport package included limited slip? The sport diff of the S6 would be more comparable. Both are awesome!!
@@austintg This was only styling package, so no limited slip diffs.
No surprises when 3 wheels on "ice". Still prefer Quattro.
Why? It was clearly overwhelmingly beaten
sofronis micharl Yes. That is rare situation when Q cant do anything. In so many years Quattro served well, x drive also drives fine. But always gonna choose system more mechanical rather than electronic. And many friends had x drive failures.
But you understand that Audi nowadays started to use haldex right?
kasparas sidlauskas Audi started using Haldex long ago for smaller models.
yeah, but the real quattro was old school and mechanical one.
Next time have a camera inside the vehicles to show if the traction control is on or off.
John Kiai Always on. If it is off, then there is graphics on the screen. Just like on dashboard in the car.
audi fanboys gonna hate
So where are Audi fans? Hahhahaha
Bmw best....haters in 3,2,1....
It is :)
Audi Quattro lovers where you at LOL
박도현 BMW winner. But how often. In the REAL world. You loose traction of three wheels at the same time?
Compare them both on a circuit on snow or gravel.
This test is just a gimmick.
@@babylon4953 How often do you drive on a snowy circuit lol. Are you racing in Siberia? Quattro may be better on snow and gravel but xDrive's better on tarmac, rainy roads, you know places where you actually drive 95% of the time
Eduard Gandore lol I live in Sweden. So I drive on snowy roads 50% of the time.
And on tarmac and wet roads. 2wd will work just fine.
Quattro works best were it matters!
Quattro es superior en otros aspectos de la tracción, por ejemplo en agarre en curvas, ya sea en seco o en mojado.
Y no hablemos de nieve, medalla de oro.
Pero es cierto que en circunstancias de fuerza explosiva ya sea en pendientes o desniveles, x-drive y 4matic son un poco superiores que Quattro, creo que para tu día a día Quattro es una tracción más completa.
I'll take the F90.
I actually think the both are great systems but... Fuck Quattro lovers😂
But why u keep gas in bmw the same lower level on last test? And u kick gas in Audi? No chance to be fair
Generally that's what the systems do. Furthermore, Audi needs more rpm (and system allows for that) to make the system work. Otherwise it is doing nothing.
BMW best 💪
you compare the audi off 2016 to bmw 2018 the tecnology evoulote so nice comparassion
ruben oliveira Both care were on sale at the same time.
and why audi is in on place and bmw is in a different place men i whave that audi and i now that the bmw is newer
are you dumb the 2016 audi sold at the same time that 2018 bmw nice video and i you change the name of the video
ruben oliveira You could buy both cars new in 2017 and 2018, so who is dumb huh?
They are in different places cause they were tested in different cities. Read the description of my channel. Drivers/owners of cars are not coming to me, I am driving to them.
@@rubenoliveira4094 are you stupid or something? The g30 is from 2016 to 2020 this year come facelift of the g30
They dont change the system just like that dumb ass
There are more videos testing new Audi q8 - a7 new model vs the same 5 series even with the m5 f90 and the Audi has the same results.
The test is bs unless you add and incline then you can have an accurate model of how much torque is actually being transfered and if it is even substantial. Will the car roll back on a slippery incline with only one wheel having traction etc
You didn't notice that this test doesn't simulate flat surface but actually a situation which is more difficult than slippery incline. Watch again.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers I am aware. It is still bs. When you factor in an incline, the torque necessary to move a mass from rest increases proportional to factors such as friction, incline angle etc. I am sorry the angle of attack of the wheel to the roller just doesn't suffice. We all know icy conditions etc can come very close to control "rollers" being used. I just wonder if enough torque can be sent to just one wheel or two if the car is on an incline. Maybe too extreme of a situation for an urban environment? That's why when you least expect all the right observations and questions are asked after the fact. Its not uncommon when the average consumer out thinks an entire R&D department of a major car Manufacturer.
@@elijahfrancis5847 Here's the test on an incline vs rollers: ruclips.net/video/OB33S9jeMBY/видео.html
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers Excellent!
@@elijahfrancis5847 As you see - flat inclined roller ramp is less difficult than these rollers. Furthermore - the car on a ramp was 1.6 while the car on rollers was 1.4T.
BMW ///M5 XDrive 💪
Quattro❤
Huh wierd i thought that quattro was the pinacle like the evo 8 but i guess not
Quattro is overrated as fck. X-Drive is one of the best or maybe the best AWD in the World at the moment
why there must be so much spinning? 4x4 should works after 1 cycle spin, not to spining so long before reaction...?
turboslav Nope, left/right torque distribution is based only on brakes, some it always takes some time to react.
Y'all, that s not fair. This Audi a6 it is not the last model.
leggere Both cars were on sale at the same time.
leggere And the new Audi A6 has exactly the same AWD as the "old" one in the video.
Why do they compare a 2016 car to a 2018. Bmw 530i had 2016 model too.
Ladislav Tànczos Both cars were on sale at the same time.
Bmw didnt changed awd system in this car
4 awd systems that have been a ridiculous test in my opinion are an unnecessary comparison that is tested on the roads with heavy snow and slippery flooring. Quatro is a system with nearly 40 years experience
BREMEN 34 Awd system of Bmw is only 5 years younger than Quattro. And their first awd was much better than first Quattro. Both of them are much younger than some other awd systems.
Try it on the snow
Snow is only testing tyres
BMW is the best❤️
I can hear that the BMW is a 520xD , but it does not really matter.
Rementor 530i.
BMW is more rear wheel bias
Ryan Angkasa This one is.
Xdrive uses a lot of electronics.That means that in 5 years your 530d Will be rwd again
+Latvietis96 but electronicaly controled.
dimekoza !
Bmw's are very reliable cars if maintained properly get outta here with the nonesense
Its not fair.You compared old A6 and new 5 series
Mete Yaylalı Fair, both were on sale at the same time.