One thing to note is that the Bandit is very light for a medium truck, and weighs less than half what the Azovs do. This means that it is far more affected by how much cargo it has to pull compared to the Azovs. This is especially true when pulling stuff like those construction trailers.
the 64131 is the best of them by a far margin because of its fuel efficiency. Its just as capable as the other 8x8s but since it is slow it lost basically all the tests
There is no hard mode yet, fuel is a joke. If you have trouble completing multiple missions in a truck park fuel on the routes like you do in the more difficult maps. You can also run the lowest engine with the off-road gear box in the Azov 5319 and its still faster than the Azov 64131😂 and has more than enough power and fuel for all missions. Tire size is what really hurts the Azov 64131.
@@calebsaruk3527 i get where your coming from, but to place fuel around the map just so my truck doesnt run of of fuel isnt something i would do, id much rather spend that time doing the mission and not have to worry about fuel. so its personal preference i guess
@@Matt_-so6kh That’s why you pick the base engine so fuel isn’t an issue, which it never has been for me following that advice. I’m just showing that fuel isn’t as big a deal as people make it seem. Its definitely personal preference, same for any truck. 👍
@@calebsaruk3527 yes thats true but if you pick the base engine you trade away torque and engine power that could be the difference between completing the mission quickly and having to grab another truck to help the truck with the cargo. this is why i love the 64131 because you get excellent fuel efficiency and the torque to outmatch most other trucks
The Bandit gets alot of flak for how tippy it is, but the crane is the culprit. It has Fleetstar Syndrome where a normally very stable truck suddenly wants to fall over if you hit a rock too hard. Take off the crane and the Bandit becomes just as stable as any other truck. I also found that it seems extra stable when using semi-trailers because the flexible frame can compensate when a semi trailer starts to tip and keeps the rear wheels planted, whereas normal hitch trailers will just drag the truck sideways when they tip. Remove the crane, use semi-trailers, becomes a very capable truck.
Ran a lot of contracts with the Bandit and never ran out of fuel...... also never have gotten stuck. Loaded it with 4 metal beams. That was with the stock motor. So if you want fuel efficiency stick with the stock motor and it still has enough power. Promise.
The azov53 is probably the best azov imo the reliability, power, and speed is what makes it the best it’s just the fuel efficiency that is its major flaw. Compared to the krs it’s hauling power is un matched. The krs just doesn’t have the power to haul huge loads far. The azov will get further before it’s out of gas. The krs is great for mud but with weight it just buries itself due to wheel spin. Once you throw it in low it’s so slow it takes so long to travel through mud and water which is basically all of the Yukon. As for the azov it plows through the water and mud with weight on and throwing it in low when needed is still faster with weight. The krs lacks power that’s with the last engine imo it’s better not to get the last engine maybe 2nd or 3rd due to similar power but better fuel efficiency. I’m starting to find certain trucks work better with off road then mud or a 2nd engine besides the last.
I like that you take the time to change up the frame addons between tests most other RUclips Snowrunners don’t they just use a sideboard bed for every test. Mixing it up is more realistic to how you play the game.
1th is supposed to be 1st. Anyway... Great video great job. I still drive 64131. Reliable, stable, durable, unstoppable, consumes less fuel, higher fuel capacity, and can fulfill every task.
The 64131 is my fool proof truck. Slow as hell, but essentially unstoppable and a fuel tank that'll last a lifetime. I pull it out when the game asks me to drag something huge through 5 rivers a forest and a swamp. Getting stuck halfway is not an option, do i take the 64.
I don't fully get why people defend the 64131 so blindly. Is the tank size and efficiency almost twice that of the other trucks? Yes. But its also half the speed so in miles per tank its pretty much the same. Use whatever makes you happy but accept the vehicle's flaws
If you've driven them around a bit you will know that is absolutely not true, the 5319 is always running out of fuel. The 64131 is slow but it trudges through anything. The Bandit is faster but it can't pull well and is tip happy, but it can fit a crane without overhanging flatbed. The last 2 are great for different situations, the 5319 we basically never use
@@alen1610 The job is to complete the missions you avoid mud if possible in any truck. When going through mud tire size and choice matter which is why the Azov 64131 looses with its smaller tires. Fuel is a joke without cost period. You don’t need the most fuel only enough. You want better fuel even the base engine with the off-road gear box is quicker in mud with the Azov 5 than the Azov 6 maxed and you’ll have more than enough fuel to complete any mission with the Azov 5 set up like that.
Я бы в тесте с грязью на камазов поставил шины с тракторные... И еще не хватает теста на опрокидывание. Бандит не люблю за то, что он постоянно падает , а вот 64131 сложно уронить
@@bsmith6191 fuel doesn’t cost anything! You only need enough fuel to complete your mission and go for fuel. The KRS has more than enough fuel to do any mission and so does the Azov 5 when you equip the base engine and the off-road gearbox which are still better performers than the Azov 6 due to its smaller tire size
@@calebsaruk3527 Hardmode wants a word with you. And in hardmode you pick the truck that not only gets the job done but has enough fuell to make it back. The Azov 6 or 7 is then the far beter choice, the azov 5 only works in a supporting roll with a fuell tank on its back. The bandit is only usefull for carying small stuff on small trips.
@@rednitro3883 nice..replying to an old comment as if the new features were available then. Nevertheless I still use the Azov 5 in hard mode but there is absolutely zero reasons other than you like them to use the Azov 5 or Azov 6 in hard mode. Just go for the Tatra from the start if you want the meta choice.
I don't understand why you put the biggest mud tires on the Bandit, but left the others on all terrain tires. Doesn't this give the Bandit a distinct edge? Or did you do that to bring the Bandit up to the standard of the other trucks? Either way, it's a bit of bad continuity. I enjoy your test videos. I have seen the Bandit in numerous tests, and it is often the only truck in the line up with big mud tires on. I think the tests would go very differently for the Bandit if you put it on the same tires as all of the other trucks, of left it on it's default tires. You know, those skinny ass highway tires it has on when you get it which means the Bandit will roll over in a stiff breeze and has the same grip level as a wet tissue? Do you have a "best truck with no upgrades" video? EDIT: yeah, this just wasn't a fait test for the other trucks. Having such wide mud tires on the Bandit gave it an unfair advantage in quite a few tests, especially the deep mud and swamp tests. Then I noticed you changed the tires on the Bandit for the ice test and gave it chains along with the other trucks. That's fine, but why didn't you give the other trucks mud tires for the mud tests? This makes no sense. Also, 1th? It's "1st". Like I said; I enjoy your video's. This isn't meant to be offensive. I'm not trolling.
@@greenmancz3342 It's not a "level playing field" then is it? You shouldn't really compare trucks that don't have the same upgrades applied. The tayga tyres perform better than mud tyres off-road. Some of the tests weren't fair to the other trucks that didn't have tayga tyres equipped. The swamp test for example. It would have been a fairer test to have the trucks on the same tyres. I don't see what's hard to understand about that.
The KRS trust me is shit!! Try it in the hardest maps (Yukon). The KRS only can drive with chains on street. Its bad in mud, and in deep snow its just useless. The 53 its a verry good truck, but fuel eficiency its bad, the 64 its one of the best truck in this cam. I carryed 5 cargo containers from Flooded foothills to Salmon Peak with 2 trailers without need to use winch. KRS will get stuck in the first mood pit.
Not sure why all the test of snow runner trucks on RUclips nearly always involve a race. If I wanted a racing game I would try Forza horizon. Snowrunner isn't a racing game !
Unless you factor in the Azov 5. The only thing the Azov 6 is meaningfully better at is having a cult following of people who don’t try out different setups for trucks.
@@Matt_-so6kh I hate the false claims, like you’re making now by trying to change my statement. Facts are what the files say and tests prove, the rest is opinion. Opinion can’t state what is ‘best’ that’s improper English. Opinion can state what you prefer. People really don’t like science when it disagrees with their opinion. The price he mentioned by the way, who doesn’t know the Azov 5 is the cheapest of the 3. But facts be damned because opinions.
@@Matt_-so6kh You already claimed that. To which I already responded facts don’t care about your opinions. Again tires size is what kills the Azov 6 in this comparison. The video proves this in the mud test and speed for reasons I already explained. Your love affair with the Azov 6 to ignore these facts proven on this video show your blindness.
One thing to note is that the Bandit is very light for a medium truck, and weighs less than half what the Azovs do. This means that it is far more affected by how much cargo it has to pull compared to the Azovs. This is especially true when pulling stuff like those construction trailers.
the 64131 is the best of them by a far margin because of its fuel efficiency. Its just as capable as the other 8x8s but since it is slow it lost basically all the tests
The Bandit gets a fuel rack and with it has more than enough range, it'll make up for it with speed too.
There is no hard mode yet, fuel is a joke. If you have trouble completing multiple missions in a truck park fuel on the routes like you do in the more difficult maps. You can also run the lowest engine with the off-road gear box in the Azov 5319 and its still faster than the Azov 64131😂 and has more than enough power and fuel for all missions. Tire size is what really hurts the Azov 64131.
@@calebsaruk3527 i get where your coming from, but to place fuel around the map just so my truck doesnt run of of fuel isnt something i would do, id much rather spend that time doing the mission and not have to worry about fuel. so its personal preference i guess
@@Matt_-so6kh That’s why you pick the base engine so fuel isn’t an issue, which it never has been for me following that advice. I’m just showing that fuel isn’t as big a deal as people make it seem.
Its definitely personal preference, same for any truck. 👍
@@calebsaruk3527 yes thats true but if you pick the base engine you trade away torque and engine power that could be the difference between completing the mission quickly and having to grab another truck to help the truck with the cargo. this is why i love the 64131 because you get excellent fuel efficiency and the torque to outmatch most other trucks
The Bandit gets alot of flak for how tippy it is, but the crane is the culprit. It has Fleetstar Syndrome where a normally very stable truck suddenly wants to fall over if you hit a rock too hard. Take off the crane and the Bandit becomes just as stable as any other truck. I also found that it seems extra stable when using semi-trailers because the flexible frame can compensate when a semi trailer starts to tip and keeps the rear wheels planted, whereas normal hitch trailers will just drag the truck sideways when they tip. Remove the crane, use semi-trailers, becomes a very capable truck.
Good lord the suspension on the krs
Shell
3:25 the Bandit was absolutely beautiful going over that
how they got that right and not any others?
@@savagegtalks5912 this is one of the bandit pros to distinguish it from the other trucks.
Ran a lot of contracts with the Bandit and never ran out of fuel...... also never have gotten stuck. Loaded it with 4 metal beams. That was with the stock motor. So if you want fuel efficiency stick with the stock motor and it still has enough power. Promise.
Azov 6 fanboys seem to have never tried this or be unaware it’s possible
Very true man!
I love the Bandit although it's definitely more tippy. As long as you drive accordingly it should be fine.
1st video I've seen of yours as I was researching KRS 58 "Bandit" and it was amazing!!!!! Epic video! Subbed!!!
Nothing
The azov53 is probably the best azov imo the reliability, power, and speed is what makes it the best it’s just the fuel efficiency that is its major flaw. Compared to the krs it’s hauling power is un matched. The krs just doesn’t have the power to haul huge loads far. The azov will get further before it’s out of gas. The krs is great for mud but with weight it just buries itself due to wheel spin. Once you throw it in low it’s so slow it takes so long to travel through mud and water which is basically all of the Yukon. As for the azov it plows through the water and mud with weight on and throwing it in low when needed is still faster with weight. The krs lacks power that’s with the last engine imo it’s better not to get the last engine maybe 2nd or 3rd due to similar power but better fuel efficiency. I’m starting to find certain trucks work better with off road then mud or a 2nd engine besides the last.
i agree, the azov 5 is a mud beast
I like that you take the time to change up the frame addons between tests most other RUclips Snowrunners don’t they just use a sideboard bed for every test. Mixing it up is more realistic to how you play the game.
I like your work and I'm not native english speaker either but "1th" really hurts my eyes.
Hollow
1th is supposed to be 1st. Anyway... Great video great job. I still drive 64131. Reliable, stable, durable, unstoppable, consumes less fuel, higher fuel capacity, and can fulfill every task.
ikr
The 64131 is my fool proof truck. Slow as hell, but essentially unstoppable and a fuel tank that'll last a lifetime. I pull it out when the game asks me to drag something huge through 5 rivers a forest and a swamp. Getting stuck halfway is not an option, do i take the 64.
The zikz 605r is like if you combined the tayga, azov 64131, and the kolob 74760 into one
Its also like the 420 where you almost never put it in low
I don't fully get why people defend the 64131 so blindly. Is the tank size and efficiency almost twice that of the other trucks? Yes. But its also half the speed so in miles per tank its pretty much the same.
Use whatever makes you happy but accept the vehicle's flaws
when u driving in mud, u will be driving slowly anyway which makes azov 6 better choice based on fuel spend.
If you've driven them around a bit you will know that is absolutely not true, the 5319 is always running out of fuel. The 64131 is slow but it trudges through anything. The Bandit is faster but it can't pull well and is tip happy, but it can fit a crane without overhanging flatbed. The last 2 are great for different situations, the 5319 we basically never use
@@alen1610 The job is to complete the missions you avoid mud if possible in any truck. When going through mud tire size and choice matter which is why the Azov 64131 looses with its smaller tires. Fuel is a joke without cost period. You don’t need the most fuel only enough. You want better fuel even the base engine with the off-road gear box is quicker in mud with the Azov 5 than the Azov 6 maxed and you’ll have more than enough fuel to complete any mission with the Azov 5 set up like that.
@@norro21 if you’d driven all combinations you wouldn’t have posted that comment
@@calebsaruk3527 what he said simply isn't true, the range is demonstrably further
Я бы в тесте с грязью на камазов поставил шины с тракторные...
И еще не хватает теста на опрокидывание. Бандит не люблю за то, что он постоянно падает , а вот 64131 сложно уронить
Just pick the one you like the look of, they all passed the tests closely.
but it didnt take into account the fuel economy
Bandit has pretty good suspension.
64131 where i may get that front bumper? or suspension
Fuel efficiency test...
Empty
Not needed no hard mode yet
KRS 58 beats the 64131 by far
Until you need fuel. Lol
@@bsmith6191 fuel doesn’t cost anything! You only need enough fuel to complete your mission and go for fuel. The KRS has more than enough fuel to do any mission and so does the Azov 5 when you equip the base engine and the off-road gearbox which are still better performers than the Azov 6 due to its smaller tire size
@@calebsaruk3527 Hardmode wants a word with you. And in hardmode you pick the truck that not only gets the job done but has enough fuell to make it back.
The Azov 6 or 7 is then the far beter choice, the azov 5 only works in a supporting roll with a fuell tank on its back.
The bandit is only usefull for carying small stuff on small trips.
@@rednitro3883 nice..replying to an old comment as if the new features were available then. Nevertheless I still use the Azov 5 in hard mode but there is absolutely zero reasons other than you like them to use the Azov 5 or Azov 6 in hard mode. Just go for the Tatra from the start if you want the meta choice.
I just wish the Bandit wasn't so tippy 😭 lol
Krs 50 is unstable on offroad and can roll over
Great video. Awesome testing and scoring system. Keep it up. Subbed
На одной комплектухе надо все тесты делать
Bandit is good, but very unstable, tips all the time. But other than that, very versatile and capable truck
I like the bandit but the fuel capacity is too low. This should probably be a factor in future tests as well ;)
With the Roof Rack (Only It has One) it doubles its fuel capacity and has free repair supplies. The other trucks don't have backup fuel.
bandit is the best except for pulling heavy stuff. leave that for other trucks
What about fuels consumption and that bandit rolls over constantly.
What about Derry and Twinsteer?🤔
You forgot to remove the fenders on the azovs
good idea, less things to get stuck.
Mmm, looks kinda cool.
Soundtrack?
Хватит устраивать гонки! В этой игре важны: проходимость, устойчивость, мощность, топливная эффективность, а также доступность модулей и прицепов.
I think this is more of which is the fastest more than the best
I don't understand why you put the biggest mud tires on the Bandit, but left the others on all terrain tires. Doesn't this give the Bandit a distinct edge? Or did you do that to bring the Bandit up to the standard of the other trucks? Either way, it's a bit of bad continuity. I enjoy your test videos. I have seen the Bandit in numerous tests, and it is often the only truck in the line up with big mud tires on. I think the tests would go very differently for the Bandit if you put it on the same tires as all of the other trucks, of left it on it's default tires. You know, those skinny ass highway tires it has on when you get it which means the Bandit will roll over in a stiff breeze and has the same grip level as a wet tissue? Do you have a "best truck with no upgrades" video?
EDIT: yeah, this just wasn't a fait test for the other trucks. Having such wide mud tires on the Bandit gave it an unfair advantage in quite a few tests, especially the deep mud and swamp tests. Then I noticed you changed the tires on the Bandit for the ice test and gave it chains along with the other trucks. That's fine, but why didn't you give the other trucks mud tires for the mud tests? This makes no sense. Also, 1th? It's "1st". Like I said; I enjoy your video's. This isn't meant to be offensive. I'm not trolling.
@@greenmancz3342 It's not a "level playing field" then is it? You shouldn't really compare trucks that don't have the same upgrades applied. The tayga tyres perform better than mud tyres off-road. Some of the tests weren't fair to the other trucks that didn't have tayga tyres equipped. The swamp test for example. It would have been a fairer test to have the trucks on the same tyres. I don't see what's hard to understand about that.
@@superchickenlips1 what exactly your point?
@@superchickenlips1 but why would you use worse tires when playing game?
Azov 64131 the best
It's the first but it have fuel tank as scout can't go anywhere
You can put a roof rack on the "Bandit" for an extra 140 litres of fuel, so it can have a total of 290 litres
Ok that's sounds good
Krs always flipped over
Exactly! I already sold it!
If you use the krs for a support vehicle its much better. Use special muds. Roof rack. And the fuel/maintenance addon.
@@Jarrizar No, Tatarin is better for scout 😁👍
Azov 64131 number one
If you ignore the facts and actual performance, sure
+ range test + subversive test
Huge wasted gap on Azor 53 is a dealbreaker for me
you cant go wrong with any of these 3
Azov 64131 is the best
The KRS is so unstable. Only truck itiped more than the KRS is the ANK. (before buff) so unstable. the 64131 = slow and steady wins the race.
The Azov 5 is less tippy than the Azov 6. It also will go through deeper mud with the taller tires
I think it was good for me to wait with imandra if i see such a nice new truck that fits oerfectly for rocky paths
The KRS trust me is shit!! Try it in the hardest maps (Yukon). The KRS only can drive with chains on street. Its bad in mud, and in deep snow its just useless. The 53 its a verry good truck, but fuel eficiency its bad, the 64 its one of the best truck in this cam. I carryed 5 cargo containers from Flooded foothills to Salmon Peak with 2 trailers without need to use winch. KRS will get stuck in the first mood pit.
вот только 5319 жрет как не в себя
Lmao firth place. At least make it first or 1st
Not sure why all the test of snow runner trucks on RUclips nearly always involve a race. If I wanted a racing game I would try Forza horizon. Snowrunner isn't a racing game !
you also need to get your destination quicker I guess….
bandit is tippy as fuck
Azov 6 is still the best.
The price is another thing you can't beat.
Unless you factor in the Azov 5. The only thing the Azov 6 is meaningfully better at is having a cult following of people who don’t try out different setups for trucks.
@@calebsaruk3527 damn you hate the azov 6 with a burning passion. i reckon its great but thats ur opinion
@@Matt_-so6kh I hate the false claims, like you’re making now by trying to change my statement. Facts are what the files say and tests prove, the rest is opinion. Opinion can’t state what is ‘best’ that’s improper English. Opinion can state what you prefer. People really don’t like science when it disagrees with their opinion.
The price he mentioned by the way, who doesn’t know the Azov 5 is the cheapest of the 3. But facts be damned because opinions.
@@calebsaruk3527 i noticed how badly you hate the azov 64131 and now your saying im making false claims. weird logic but ok
@@Matt_-so6kh You already claimed that. To which I already responded facts don’t care about your opinions. Again tires size is what kills the Azov 6 in this comparison. The video proves this in the mud test and speed for reasons I already explained.
Your love affair with the Azov 6 to ignore these facts proven on this video show your blindness.
Husk
Great vid btw, subbed!
Firth
pc is 🤢🤮
?
?
Yeah it is gross