barr is loathsome overall in his outlook and conduct, but in this circumstance, he's not pulling too many punches from landing on trump, especially given barr's own (awful) baseline positions and loyalties. He basically suggested that trump's guilty, the election was fair & accurate, trump''s unqualified to be president, & the case here against is justified & reasonably strong (albeit he questions if he would have charged it). For a republican stooge, that's not bad (in terms of having some tether to reality on this matter).
So instead of critical thought and the weighing of ideas you condemn this man because he isn’t condemning someone. That speaks volumes to why the country is failing today. Thanks for the insight and the people who agree with you here.
@@chrissupport When he said it - I got chills. Think about it - Conviction doesn't guarantee a loss of office for Trump. But an acquittal? Very well could ensure a win and it would be a win that had nothing to do with 'the issues.'
If Bill Barr thinks prosecuting Trump is a slippery slope, he needs to tell us how far down the "Trump can subvert our Democracy" slippery slope we are.
'You spoke to the January 6th Congressional Committee, have you spoke to Jack Smith's investigators?' Barr's 'I'm not gonna get into that' reply, means of course he has done because otherwise he could simply have said no. Well done Kaitlan, we know what it meant.
Not really. As far as I can see, Barr did nothing wrong in this case. In fact, he told Trump there was no election fraud and he resigned his position over this subject. I agree it's very likely he testified, though.
@@unwishfulthinkJ6 videos came out and proved J6 was an insurrection by the FBI and Democrats! Many undercover FBI agents there and ANTIFA encouraging people to move towards the capital building an go inside. It is ALL on video! No we see why Pelosi refused Trump request to have 10,000 national guards present that day!
@@singed8853To make it crystal clear, telling untrues is not at all the only way to mislead the public. Partial trues work just as well. As was corroborated by you.
Billy got punked... it's Donald's game... He has punked for too long tho... we must get away from OLD people running the show... like I don't want my grandmaw or grandpaw running the show... they can't even fix the remote control for the TV or even wake up on time... this needs to change brother... peace and love to you
He had to say the first part "I wouldn't have brought the case" to appease the donor class. He personally would have brought the case, but his entire purpose is to do whatever he is told.
@@ModMINI Ya but he had already done his job for the king by killing the mueller investigation, so anything after that is a bs clean up misson and to sell books. He now has no power and turned traitor when he had the power. Anything he says now is empty bs.
6:05 Barr: "I doubt he remembers all the different versions of events he's given over the last few years." It would indeed be difficult if not practically impossible to reconstruct all the pieces of a word salad to be exactly in the position as it was first tossed.
During trump's town hall earlier this year, she let trump run all over her and she only asked softball questions. It was horrible and she was a disgrace. Her CNN show has really low ratings.
@NastyPerson-uh7cp Supreme Court isn't touching this case. Either way Federal Court cases aren't allowed to be televised. Now not sure that rule can be changed or not. And if it can I don't know who has the power to change that rule.
@@ryanlamaster2945 “I just read this new indictment by Jack Smith which as the others, reeks of political corruption. He literally indicted free speech. This will easily be thrown out when it is challenged before the Supreme Court” -Vivek Ramaswamy GOP candidate
Exactly! But not sure I would call it windidly ... he was bumbling thru. how can you give a response like that and have people believe you're being honest.
Just like they refused to read the freely available Mueller report and perfect phone call script. It is called the ostrich tactic, pretend somethiong didnot happen because you did not see or read about it
@@josh.o3379 Like I have said a million times Biden isn't my god I dont care if he goes to prison or not. If they find enough evidence to convict him then so be it. I wont go on videos about Biden to bring up Trump because of that. Since I can talk about Trump on a video related to Trump without bringing up Biden as some knee jerk reaction.
Barr first says he disapproves of the indictment based on discretion and divisiveness, and on it distracting from the election. Then right after, he goes on to agree with the legitimacy of the indictment and the facts alleged. So he's talking out of both sides of his mouth. And btw, the "distracting from the election" could be applied to all the indictments, or any indictment even remotely near an election year, so that too is a bogus "argument."
He's trying to articulate the Heritage Foundation and Federalist Society doctrine. Justice must never appear political, even if it means we might get tyrants like this. This bandaid has to be torn off. Both sides can't be right and both sides can't be winners. This is either the final battle in this political war or it's the biggest battle so far.
Also, isn't it the number-one most important issue in this election to determine whether one of the candidates is a criminal who tried to destroy American democracy? This indictment isn't a "distraction from the election" -- it's the most important single thing in this election and possibly any election in US history.
Agreed! And that comment he made about caring about divisiveness is bs. What we should care more about is how dangerous MAGA cult, etc., people will be during the trial ...
Bill is like the man that stood waaaaaaaay back when the fight was happening and then when all cleared out he comes running in as though he was one of the heroes! I'm so tired of these cowards.
what is wrong with US political journalists ?? they softball every guest they have !! your political journalistic class are a world laughing stock and ts a big part of the reason you have trump and the carnival of freaks for politicians you have !! what a joke !
He literally just admitted he would NOT have gone ahead with indictment. The clown whines about "weaponization of the Justice Department" then admits he would have weaponized it to get Trump off, AGAIN, because...division or some such BS. The country is divided exactly because of Bill Barr and all the Republican cowards who enabled Trump. Barr is still the pathetic lying traitor he always has been, even if CNN is trying to legitimize the worthless POS. WE WILL NEVER FORGET WHAT YOU ARE OR WHAT YOU DID TO THE COUNTRY BILL BARR.
Trump's father Fred was arrested in New York City in 1927, when a group of Klansmen got into a brawl with police officers during a Memorial Day parade in Queens. There is a document trail, and the names, dates, and addresses match up. The New York Times published a story about the riot and the seven men who were arrested; Fred Trump is mentioned by name. His address is given at 175-24 Devonshire Road, Jamaica, New York City, and the federal census of 1930 shows that Fred Trump resided there.
In 1986-7 the state of NSW in Australia asked for bids to build the first casino in Sydney. Four groups submitted bids for the lucrative project. Cabinet papers declassified 30 years later revealed that the Trump bid was rejected after NSW State Police reported that the Trump mafia connections and financial unviability made their bid undesirable.
she is asking about Trump and the first word that came out of his mouth is Biden and his son. I know that politicians do that but sometimes they look like imbeciles when it is exaggerated.
Kaitlan failed to ask Barr this vital question: If you feel that this indictment should not have been brought, how would you propose to prevent any future President from doing the same?
Agreed. And she could also have asked whether he thought Garland played it too slow. Because if this indictment was posted - say - 12 months ago, it would have been much less political. Which was Barr's main concern. I don't really agree with that concern, but it's not completely wrong. I actually agree with a lot that he's saying now , which I find very surprising. I only take exception with his remarks on the Hunter Biden case, which could use some questioning sometime too. But not right now, since it wasn't really the topic
I love how bill Barr is always saying how Trump weaponized the Department of Justice while he was the Department of Justice. Hes the one that went after people for Donald Trump. So hes not innocent. He should be charge too.
Everyone in any way involved with tRump and his administration is looking bad now. To varying degrees. They are all well aware that the institutional veil of respectability and normalcy (co-opted by them to provide cover) which used to hang between them and the public has dropped to the floor... and they're squirming bigly.
@@zachriley7132Barr and chief of staff Mark Meadows are both cooperating witnesses against Trump. Mark Meadows mostly to save his own ass. Mark was involved in most everything that happened and I’m sure there is physical evidence against him (texts, emails, etc.).
Good, engaging interview by Kaitlin. She got a lot more out of him (Barr) than he normally shares. She exposed Barr with the questions about if he would have moved the indictment forward as AG.
@@HiHo-zh4rd if you're suggesting I'm "appeased" you're far too narrow-minded. I don't have to forgive or forget in order to enjoy watching the jackals turn on each other. Besides, coming from someone so starched and vanilla, it was an amusing turn of phrase, regardless of what I think of him.
@@OneEyed_Jack who is even listening to him? I didn't even listen to this. I am not interested in a word any of them have to say. It just amazes me how afraid of T rum p all of them are.
It's the cost of freedom. It's bettter than the alternative - jailing people for what they say. That means the government decides what you may or may not say and by extension has the power to outlaw political movements.
There should absolutely be some expectation that those in positions of public trust are held to a higher standard and shouldn't be able to megaphone their opinions or explicit disinformation as "facts".
I’m all for free speech but why do congressman and Senators get away with blatantly lying, saying the most disgusting, outlandish things. If MPs in the U.K. parliament came out with the bile, racism and lying these lawmakers do they would be suspended, or have to resign. Do you not have a law for hate speech crime? As much as I dislike the politicians in my country, they would never get away with what Marjory Taylor Green, Gosart and other vile republicans come out with.
Could he have come forward sooner? Yes. He could have spoken out right after he told Trump that the claims were BS. Instead of slinking away and not speaking up until after he left office, he could have called a press conference and said that the Justice Department has looked into the claims and they are false. He could have left by speaking the truth, then maybe Trump would have been forced to back down.
The voter's have a right to know prior to the election. It's the only way for the voter's to make an informed and intelligent decision when they do vote!
On the other hand, Trump can pardon himself if the trial is still ongoing while he is president. If the trial ends earlier, he may not even become president again, which would be a shame.
You overestimate how many people make either informed or intelligent decisions. Most have their partisan goggles on and don’t even look at the candidate or policies in detail.
@@gulliverthegullible6667Constitutionally, I don't think he can pardon himself. Think about it, he could shoot someone and then pardon himself. It doesn't work that way, I don't think our fathers of this country thought of it that way..
Look how fast you crushed that MUELLER REPORT! Didn't take too long for that now ...WHY ARE WE ASKING BARR ABOUT ANYTHING? YOU HELPED THE MONSTER BARR!
Then her reaction is even funnier! She's like yeah right OK! Clearly he just admitted that he did speak to Jack Smith! Yikes! Talk about someone who really has the receipts!
Kaitlan does an amazing job of listening to the answers given to her and sensing when to double or triple down on a question. Perhaps, she has a really good producer in her ear, but either way, the interviews she does feel very genuine and a bit unpredictable. She takes her job/career serious and it shows! These are dangerous times and it is so refreshing to see a solid cable news host take their role with responsibility and stay away from making lame jokes and yucking-it-up with guests/panelists.
Yes! She is engaged in "active listening". Its definitely a skill. Its interesting because while she is very prepared with her list of questions, she is also very attentive and present so that she can respond immediately to what the interviewee is suggesting for clarification and expansion.
Very good interview, Barr knows a lot and has done a lot! However, never forget his vile deeds during his time! We see you Barr, trying to rehab your image!
I heard Eastman was/will be named as a co-conspirator to separate him from someone who'd provide legal counsel. Jack Smith has thought this through. I agree that an "I was just listening to my attorney" is a lame defense when so many others told Trump the election wasn't "stolen". It makes Trump look like he shopped for someone who'd tell him what he wanted to hear.
In the indictment, Eastmen is most likely the person already identified as co-conspriartor number 2. It's more a queation of whether or not he will be indicted or is already a cooperating witness. With Trump so ready to throw him under the bus, I think the likelihood that he WILL cooperate goes up.
The separation of charges was likely to allow it to move expeditiously through court. Adding co-defendants would give Trump too many levers to slow things down. Trump would be barred from choosing one of his codefendants to represent him in this case. (Most of them are getting disbarred anyway)
@@ModMINI I meant Trump would say he took bad legal advice from Eastman before J6. Jack Smith would say Eastman was helping plan the coup conspiracy and wasn't functioning as an attorney. But I didn't think of the other four - the same would apply to them. That might leave Trump's only "legitimate" attorneys as those who told Trump the election wasn't stolen.. and that's not hearsay.
William , It seemed obvious that Trump began his campaign so early thinking it would stop this proceeding if he is on the campaign trail. It was so early everyone "Except Barr " figured it out.
Good interview. Collins is proving to be a great interviewer and asking all of the questions America wants to hear from those around the former president.
How does Kaitlan keep a straight face???? 99% of educated people would have said "Are you effing kidding me??" She is very professional. Watching these two reminds me of a giraffe towering over a rhino. 😸
His actions demonstrated, he did. Louis Dejoy, and Trump moved fast to tempered with mail in ballots. A clear sign, they knew Trump wasn't the People's choice
that is ridiculous to be able to lie and that is first amendment protected they are saying if you say fire in a theater and there is no fire then that is protected or you call nine one one and say a lie that is protected then
Billy you all but tried to steal it yourself until team crazy got a hold of the steering wheel. So piss off, you jumped into a life boat at the last second.
We haven’t forgotten who you are Bill Barr #nevertrust
Aw, give him some credit. He was one of the first rats to jump ship when he realized Dumpy was going to bring him down, too.
So true.
He should be in Prison too
Exactly
Wasn’t this clown one if the “adults in the room” . He encouraged Dump to break the law! He’s got more responsibility than any crackpot lawyer!!!
LOL! Just Barr bullshitting and trying to have it both ways
Well he is a lawyer 🤣🤣
Yea he's a big old ass crook 🪝😈
@@BrianSmith-yn2zg lawyer crook all of them was lawyers 😡😈
barr is loathsome overall in his outlook and conduct, but in this circumstance, he's not pulling too many punches from landing on trump, especially given barr's own (awful) baseline positions and loyalties. He basically suggested that trump's guilty, the election was fair & accurate, trump''s unqualified to be president, & the case here against is justified & reasonably strong (albeit he questions if he would have charged it). For a republican stooge, that's not bad (in terms of having some tether to reality on this matter).
So instead of critical thought and the weighing of ideas you condemn this man because he isn’t condemning someone. That speaks volumes to why the country is failing today. Thanks for the insight and the people who agree with you here.
It's not what Bill is saying now - it's what he is remembered for doing and saying while in office .
He's not saying much now... he's got a different tone than he did with other cases. Not sure why he'd bring up 'acquittal' as a danger.
@@chrissupport When he said it - I got chills. Think about it - Conviction doesn't guarantee a loss of office for Trump. But an acquittal? Very well could ensure a win and it would be a win that had nothing to do with 'the issues.'
Even Trump now is seeing him for what he's worth.
@@angeldaisy5248 very well said...that and more he would be remembered for.
Yes he could have spoken up and not defended T. Allowing T to be impeached.
If Bill Barr thinks prosecuting Trump is a slippery slope, he needs to tell us how far down the "Trump can subvert our Democracy" slippery slope we are.
'You spoke to the January 6th Congressional Committee, have you spoke to Jack Smith's investigators?' Barr's 'I'm not gonna get into that' reply, means of course he has done because otherwise he could simply have said no. Well done Kaitlan, we know what it meant.
It's like Michael Cohen said, look at who from the inner circle _isn't_ being indicted for your likely cooperating witnesses
Not really. As far as I can see, Barr did nothing wrong in this case. In fact, he told Trump there was no election fraud and he resigned his position over this subject.
I agree it's very likely he testified, though.
That answer would obviously be a YES.
He knew even before the election. That's why he started the claim "rigged election".
Really 😆
Can’t believe a darn thing bill Barr says….he should’ve spoke out long ago.
Better late than never. At least Barr wasn't part of Team Crazy during J6. Give him a little credit.
He should have told the truth about the Mueller Report.
He did tell the truth. Nothing he said was untrue about that report. I challenge you to name one misstatement that he made.
@@unwishfulthinkJ6 videos came out and proved J6 was an insurrection by the FBI and Democrats! Many undercover FBI agents there and ANTIFA encouraging people to move towards the capital building an go inside. It is ALL on video! No we see why Pelosi refused Trump request to have 10,000 national guards present that day!
@@singed8853To make it crystal clear, telling untrues is not at all the only way to mislead the public. Partial trues work just as well. As was corroborated by you.
Hey Barr who are you to question anyone? You acted as Donnie's personal attorney for years !
They shouldn’t even interview him.
I think they should, it gives a perspective from someone who knew trump was done for. I enjoy his perspective
Billy got punked... it's Donald's game... He has punked for too long tho... we must get away from OLD people running the show... like I don't want my grandmaw or grandpaw running the show... they can't even fix the remote control for the TV or even wake up on time... this needs to change brother... peace and love to you
Exactly! Anyone who knowingly went into the Trump administration is suspect of low moral values and terrible judgment.
Attorney and henchman
If he truly doesn’t know that he lost, he isn’t mentally capable of holding office…..oh, wait….his words and actions already proved that.
He already told you he was too stupid to understand holes though paper!
You are so brain dead if you think Biden is any better...
So now we have Biden? Are you nuts????
@@loriolson1143 Wouldn't have had Biden if you didn't have Trump first!
@@loriolson1143, ANYONE would be better than Trump!
62 judges across America said he lost, he knew !!!
The democrats despise black people dude. Have you no shame?
He stared out saying he would not indict him. Then he said the indictments had merit as the interview went on!
Bill is talking out of both sides of his face... again.
He had to say the first part "I wouldn't have brought the case" to appease the donor class. He personally would have brought the case, but his entire purpose is to do whatever he is told.
Yes, he still had to throw in the whatabout Hunter BS
😂
His mouth is as uneven as his sideburns. Did you notice?
Eff Bill for covering for Trump.
He reminds me of THE BABY from Jim Henson's "Dinosaurs". "I'm the baby, gotta love me".
Dude it's good to see that are still some complient people watching CIA... I mean CNN😅....
barr is a criminal like donald
@@JohnAdams-mu7xd
If only you were competent enough to express yourself in proper English.
Your handle should be Elmer Fudd.
This guy Barr is a trump puppet.
Him talk with fork tongue 👅
Barr should be included in this indictment -- and others.
Well... I'm thinking, hopefully.. We're not done yet.
Barr appears to be the only one in DoJ that stayed away from this thing. Remember, he resigned over it.
Why cause barr knows the indictment is bullshit and its not strong enough
@@ModMINI Ya but he had already done his job for the king by killing the mueller investigation, so anything after that is a bs clean up misson and to sell books. He now has no power and turned traitor when he had the power. Anything he says now is empty bs.
This indictment is about J6, Bill Barr famously refused to go along with the the big lie.
6:05 Barr: "I doubt he remembers all the different versions of events he's given over the last few years." It would indeed be difficult if not practically impossible to reconstruct all the pieces of a word salad to be exactly in the position as it was first tossed.
This young woman is becoming a star ⭐️. She gets to the point and sticks to getting a clear, no BS answer. 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
She is all BS all the time.
During trump's town hall earlier this year, she let trump run all over her and she only asked softball questions. It was horrible and she was a disgrace. Her CNN show has really low ratings.
she is a push over
She started at the Daily Caller and does whatever her bosses tell her to do, including no tough questions to Bill Barr.
It doesn't matter... No one watches Fake News CNN.. I saw clips of this interview on Fox News
He is just a normal citizen no one is above the law.
Except his brain is abnormal.
Same goes for Joe Biden, hes been lying for years, impeachment coming soon
agree that on one is above the law, but he's anything but "normal"
Correction! Donald ain't normal. He's a sociopath.
Why is the GOP scared of Trump?
I love when Kaitlin laughs at him when he says "I'm not gonna get into that".
Yeah... Because he sang like a Bird to Jack Smith! Hysterical!!!
Because we all know the answer is yes, he did speak to Jack Smith.
Pretty quick response!
great interview kaitlin
This is the most epic non-denial denial I have ever seen in decades of newswatching! She crushed him with a huge rock!
We demand a speedy AND televised trial!
Unfortunately federal trials can't be televised unless they change rules in this instance.
@NastyPerson-uh7cp Supreme Court isn't touching this case. Either way Federal Court cases aren't allowed to be televised. Now not sure that rule can be changed or not. And if it can I don't know who has the power to change that rule.
@@ryanlamaster2945 “I just read this new indictment by Jack Smith which as the others, reeks of political corruption. He literally indicted free speech. This will easily be thrown out when it is challenged before the Supreme Court” -Vivek Ramaswamy GOP candidate
@justcruzzinn he obviously didn't read the indictment. But that's not what this thread is about it's about a televised Federal Court case.
@@MajorAnthonyNelson
If the shoe was just on the other foot, eh grandma?
You elderly old timers have reverted back to your childhood intellectually.
We do need live video coverage of the trials, All out in the open to show testimony under oath. GIVE us transparency !
He is so full of it!
Bill avoiding eye contact while long windily admitting he would have done nothing.
Exactly! But not sure I would call it windidly ... he was bumbling thru. how can you give a response like that and have people believe you're being honest.
It's like he hadn't even heard the question before.
Yeah.. who was he speaking to?
Bill was making sure he didn't incriminate himself with any of his answers.
Agreed!!! Noticed that too!!!
"I'm not gonna to get into that". In other words YES he spoke with Jack Smith's prosecutors.
The indictment is free to view so anyone saying its a violation of the first amendment definitely did not read the second page of said indictment.
Biden Indictment next!
Just like they refused to read the freely available Mueller report and perfect phone call script.
It is called the ostrich tactic, pretend somethiong didnot happen because you did not see or read about it
@@josh.o3379 Like I have said a million times Biden isn't my god I dont care if he goes to prison or not. If they find enough evidence to convict him then so be it. I wont go on videos about Biden to bring up Trump because of that. Since I can talk about Trump on a video related to Trump without bringing up Biden as some knee jerk reaction.
@@josh.o3379
Yeah because that will make Trump innocent 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Edit; in case you missed it, that was sarcasm.
@@josh.o3379Name 1 crime he has committed,we'll wait....😂
ALL Americans deserve a fair verdict before voting begins in 2024 election?????????????
Did Mike Pence literally throw Trump under the bus in that video ? 😂😂😂😂😂😂
He can not look at her. He is not being honest😮😮
WHY ISN’T BARR BEING INVESTIGATED???????????
Because he was not doing anything wrong like Mr Trump - I feel so shameful to have MrTrump as my former President - Sorry I had to say that 😢
He resigned because of it. He was gone before Jan 6
Barr first says he disapproves of the indictment based on discretion and divisiveness, and on it distracting from the election. Then right after, he goes on to agree with the legitimacy of the indictment and the facts alleged. So he's talking out of both sides of his mouth. And btw, the "distracting from the election" could be applied to all the indictments, or any indictment even remotely near an election year, so that too is a bogus "argument."
Exactly! I thought the whole issue was “don’t politicize the DOJ!” His whole argument was based on “politicizing the DOJ”.
He's trying to articulate the Heritage Foundation and Federalist Society doctrine. Justice must never appear political, even if it means we might get tyrants like this. This bandaid has to be torn off. Both sides can't be right and both sides can't be winners.
This is either the final battle in this political war or it's the biggest battle so far.
Also, isn't it the number-one most important issue in this election to determine whether one of the candidates is a criminal who tried to destroy American democracy? This indictment isn't a "distraction from the election" -- it's the most important single thing in this election and possibly any election in US history.
Agreed! And that comment he made about caring about divisiveness is bs. What we should care more about is how dangerous MAGA cult, etc., people will be during the trial ...
And then combining it with "but but but Hunter Biden!" . I don't have words.. What an evil and dishonest man.
The whole first minute of this interview is Bills way of saying he knows he’s guilty as hell and doesn’t want to be indicted himself 😒
correct- writing on the wall for all in Trumps orbit. He is literally sh...ing himself
Bill is like the man that stood waaaaaaaay back when the fight was happening and then when all cleared out he comes running in as though he was one of the heroes! I'm so tired of these cowards.
I laughed out loud when Bill Barr said he didn’t want to get into his time with the investigators .
It’s even better in slo-mo. Go to 7:57 and adjust playback speed to .5.
@@TentinQuarantino_ Kaitlan Collins: "Uh-kay..."
what is wrong with US political journalists ?? they softball every guest they have !! your political journalistic class are a world laughing stock and ts a big part of the reason you have trump and the carnival of freaks for politicians you have !! what a joke !
He literally just admitted he would NOT have gone ahead with indictment. The clown whines about "weaponization of the Justice Department" then admits he would have weaponized it to get Trump off, AGAIN, because...division or some such BS. The country is divided exactly because of Bill Barr and all the Republican cowards who enabled Trump. Barr is still the pathetic lying traitor he always has been, even if CNN is trying to legitimize the worthless POS. WE WILL NEVER FORGET WHAT YOU ARE OR WHAT YOU DID TO THE COUNTRY BILL BARR.
@@TentinQuarantino_ That scene was already pretty impactful on normal speed, .5 made it so much more obvious !
Trump took his own advice and is now blaming his lawyers.
Trump was too stupid to understand holes though paper!
As always blaming everyone for his SH!t.
Precisely,he sought out people who told him what he wanted to hear.
He's the world biggest con-man... plain and simple!
@@Xecutioner. He is the mob. A delinquent mobster.
Trump's father Fred was arrested in New York City in 1927, when a group of Klansmen got into a brawl with police officers during a Memorial Day parade in Queens. There is a document trail, and the names, dates, and addresses match up. The New York Times published a story about the riot and the seven men who were arrested; Fred Trump is mentioned by name. His address is given at 175-24 Devonshire Road, Jamaica, New York City, and the federal census of 1930 shows that Fred Trump resided there.
Fred taught racism.
In 1986-7 the state of NSW in Australia asked for bids to build the first casino in Sydney. Four groups submitted bids for the lucrative project. Cabinet papers declassified 30 years later revealed that the Trump bid was rejected after NSW State Police reported that the Trump mafia connections and financial unviability made their bid undesirable.
@@johnwatters6922
Pity this info wasn't published in America
she is asking about Trump and the first word that came out of his mouth is Biden and his son. I know that politicians do that but sometimes they look like imbeciles when it is exaggerated.
Where was fred Flintstone when Benedict Donald was committing his crimes!!???
Kaitlan failed to ask Barr this vital question: If you feel that this indictment should not have been brought, how would you propose to prevent any future President from doing the same?
Agreed. And she could also have asked whether he thought Garland played it too slow. Because if this indictment was posted - say - 12 months ago, it would have been much less political. Which was Barr's main concern.
I don't really agree with that concern, but it's not completely wrong.
I actually agree with a lot that he's saying now , which I find very surprising. I only take exception with his remarks on the Hunter Biden case, which could use some questioning sometime too. But not right now, since it wasn't really the topic
🎯
Including the past & present "president."
Kaitlin is still an amateur. Bless her heart.
@@rebeccasmith8567 you belong on newsmax... run along.
Kaitlin honestly is doing such an amazing job. You go girl 🎉
Can we just have another 8 years of Obama as POTUS? Like...please!!!
It was like going from Thomas Jefferson to Bart Simpson.
no please not !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO WAY
Pretty please 🙏
We should be allowed to have him back because he didn't serve consecutively. Please please 🙏
Hell no!
I love how bill Barr is always saying how Trump weaponized the Department of Justice while he was the Department of Justice. Hes the one that went after people for Donald Trump. So hes not innocent. He should be charge too.
He was effectively acting as Trump's personal attorney, not the AG.
Wtf do they ask if Trump BELIEVED he lost. Does it matter what he believes?
The only thing I would trust Bill Barr on is a recommendation on a local buffet!
Not even. Has he ever paid for a meal out of his own pocket??
@@KB-ld6ql oh, he KNOWS his buffets. You best believe.
We're talking calories over michelin stars here right?
The guilt in his face, cant even look Kaitlyn in the eyes, nor the camera
She looks good 😊
Everyone in any way involved with tRump and his administration is looking bad now. To varying degrees. They are all well aware that the institutional veil of respectability and normalcy (co-opted by them to provide cover) which used to hang between them and the public has dropped to the floor... and they're squirming bigly.
I think Barr is a cooperating witness and singing like bird to Jack Smith.
Yeah, Barr being Barr.
The man who actually weaponized the DOJ
That is Bills opinion not what courts run on. They run on facts not conjecture
Only a fool would pretend to know the operation of someone else's thoughts.
Was he this worried when he was being Trump's flunky?
“I’m not gonna get into that” followed by a moment of silence is very telling.
Yeah, him quickly answering "I'm not gonna get into that" means that's a big fat YES that he spoke to Jack Smith!!!
@@melissabaliva2989 Barr does not do well with surprise questions
Yup. I think Barr is a cooperating witness and singing like bird to Jack Smith.
@@zachriley7132Barr and chief of staff Mark Meadows are both cooperating witnesses against Trump. Mark Meadows mostly to save his own ass. Mark was involved in most everything that happened and I’m sure there is physical evidence against him (texts, emails, etc.).
Good, engaging interview by Kaitlin. She got a lot more out of him (Barr) than he normally shares. She exposed Barr with the questions about if he would have moved the indictment forward as AG.
I can't even finish watching this, he is a waste of time.
Barr has a bad past, but he now speaks truth.
Anyone with a lick’a sense knows he knew well that he lost
What about all those hillbillies with the MAGA hats? Do they have any sense?
Barr almost ended up as #7.
Right🙌🏼
Then Ginni Thomas should've been #8.
Still room for him. Just say'n
People lke LIndsay Graham may have some uncomfortable months ahead.
I'm far from a fan of former VP Powder, but "gaggle of crackpot lawyers" was awesome! Credit where credit is due. Bravo, sir.
Hilarious how easy it is to appease the masses.
@@HiHo-zh4rd if you're suggesting I'm "appeased" you're far too narrow-minded. I don't have to forgive or forget in order to enjoy watching the jackals turn on each other. Besides, coming from someone so starched and vanilla, it was an amusing turn of phrase, regardless of what I think of him.
@@OneEyed_Jack who is even listening to him? I didn't even listen to this. I am not interested in a word any of them have to say. It just amazes me how afraid of T rum p all of them are.
And yet he says he would vote for Trump again. Disgusting for even putting him on the show. Take off eh.
That was a skilful interview - Kaitlan said very few words, let the guest talk, but asked the right questions.
Kaitlan is a democrat lackey. She has zero skill
I will always have a problem with lying being protected by free speech where people are relying upon the speaker to honestly inform the public.
It's the cost of freedom. It's bettter than the alternative - jailing people for what they say. That means the government decides what you may or may not say and by extension has the power to outlaw political movements.
@@ModMINI❤
Like faux news?
There should absolutely be some expectation that those in positions of public trust are held to a higher standard and shouldn't be able to megaphone their opinions or explicit disinformation as "facts".
I’m all for free speech but why do congressman and Senators get away with blatantly lying, saying the most disgusting, outlandish things. If MPs in the U.K. parliament came out with the bile, racism and lying these lawmakers do they would be suspended, or have to resign. Do you not have a law for hate speech crime? As much as I dislike the politicians in my country, they would never get away with what Marjory Taylor Green, Gosart and other vile republicans come out with.
Jack got everybody singing including billy bar😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Could he have come forward sooner? Yes. He could have spoken out right after he told Trump that the claims were BS. Instead of slinking away and not speaking up until after he left office, he could have called a press conference and said that the Justice Department has looked into the claims and they are false. He could have left by speaking the truth, then maybe Trump would have been forced to back down.
He was part of the Problem! You created that Monster 👿
Barr helped hold justice as hostage in our country.
Yep. He's the one, including with Trump, that weaponized the DOJ!
That pause when she asked him if he has spoken to the special council is telling.
Barr's got a lot to answer for. Jail him.
BILL BARR IS JUST LIKE CNN THEY DONT NO HOW TO TELL THE TROUTH. "TRUMP 2024"
When did CNN become the mouthpiece of the right wing? Bill Barr? Trump''s lawyer? Jeez
Real surprise he wouldn’t have approved the indictment!
The voter's have a right to know prior to the election. It's the only way for the voter's to make an informed and intelligent decision when they do vote!
On the other hand, Trump can pardon himself if the trial is still ongoing while he is president. If the trial ends earlier, he may not even become president again, which would be a shame.
70 million eligible voters didn't bother to vote last election.
You overestimate how many people make either informed or intelligent decisions. Most have their partisan goggles on and don’t even look at the candidate or policies in detail.
CNN and Barr are full of lies! We all know it!
@@gulliverthegullible6667Constitutionally, I don't think he can pardon himself. Think about it, he could shoot someone and then pardon himself. It doesn't work that way, I don't think our fathers of this country thought of it that way..
Look how fast you crushed that MUELLER REPORT! Didn't take too long for that now ...WHY ARE WE ASKING BARR ABOUT ANYTHING? YOU HELPED THE MONSTER BARR!
Watch Bill Barr's reaction at 7:57 to the question "Did you speak to Jack Smith?" Obviously he did!
Then her reaction is even funnier! She's like yeah right OK! Clearly he just admitted that he did speak to Jack Smith! Yikes! Talk about someone who really has the receipts!
Kaitlan does an amazing job of listening to the answers given to her and sensing when to double or triple down on a question. Perhaps, she has a really good producer in her ear, but either way, the interviews she does feel very genuine and a bit unpredictable. She takes her job/career serious and it shows! These are dangerous times and it is so refreshing to see a solid cable news host take their role with responsibility and stay away from making lame jokes and yucking-it-up with guests/panelists.
This is probably all or nearly all her. Remember where she was the last 5 years.
You can see it all on her face right before she calls them out on their BS 😂
Yes! She is engaged in "active listening". Its definitely a skill. Its interesting because while she is very prepared with her list of questions, she is also very attentive and present so that she can respond immediately to what the interviewee is suggesting for clarification and expansion.
Very good interview, Barr knows a lot and has done a lot! However, never forget his vile deeds during his time! We see you Barr, trying to rehab your image!
He's not trying to rehab his image, he's trying to stay out of jail.
@@PeaceOutWorld LMMFAO 🤣😂😂
I heard Eastman was/will be named as a co-conspirator to separate him from someone who'd provide legal counsel. Jack Smith has thought this through. I agree that an "I was just listening to my attorney" is a lame defense when so many others told Trump the election wasn't "stolen". It makes Trump look like he shopped for someone who'd tell him what he wanted to hear.
The dump 💩 only listens to yes men.
In the indictment, Eastmen is most likely the person already identified as co-conspriartor number 2. It's more a queation of whether or not he will be indicted or is already a cooperating witness. With Trump so ready to throw him under the bus, I think the likelihood that he WILL cooperate goes up.
The separation of charges was likely to allow it to move expeditiously through court. Adding co-defendants would give Trump too many levers to slow things down.
Trump would be barred from choosing one of his codefendants to represent him in this case. (Most of them are getting disbarred anyway)
@@ModMINI He may be under indictment already; it could be sealed and we wouldn't know. I don't think Eastmen is going to slip away from this.
@@ModMINI I meant Trump would say he took bad legal advice from Eastman before J6. Jack Smith would say Eastman was helping plan the coup conspiracy and wasn't functioning as an attorney. But I didn't think of the other four - the same would apply to them. That might leave Trump's only "legitimate" attorneys as those who told Trump the election wasn't stolen.. and that's not hearsay.
Where is hunter biden
"I'm not going to get into that."
Awarkard stare down and silence.
🤔
😆🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
William , It seemed obvious that Trump began his campaign so early thinking it would stop this proceeding if he is on the campaign trail. It was so early everyone "Except Barr " figured it out.
Bill bar you help created this monster
We are a year and half from the next election, not a few weeks….
But Barr said he would vote for Trump again.
We know who you are bill.
It will be hilarious if they take away his passport and ground his plane! An ankle monitor would be epic!
LOL! Too bad there's no way in hell.
As usual, Barr says absolutely nothing.
How this man ever become Attorney General is a complete mystery.
Corruption is great for Federalists! Business is good! Booming!
No, that's not a mystery. He is a suckass. That's no mystery. And the former guy knew that very well. He can smell a toady from miles away.
Because he'll do (almost) anything you tell him to.
How did he become AG? Because he went to a dinner with Drumpf at Mar-a-Lardo and all he said was "Yes, Sir. No, Sir." and "Anything you want Sir."
Barr's appointment was no mystery. The real mystery was trump making it into office. Once that happened, the likes of Barr was pretty much assured.
The only thing he’s worried about is that he’s going to be indicted along with him and that’s exactly what he’s doing, trying to protect his own ass
🎯
What in the world would bill Barr be indicted for? Crazy
That pause??? I think he spoke to Jack Smith.
Trump thinks barr is a traitor
Good interview. Collins is proving to be a great interviewer and asking all of the questions America wants to hear from those around the former president.
How come no one talks about the insane idea of someone pardoning himself? Doesn’t anyone think this logic error should be corrected ?
‘It’s not a lie if you believe it’
George Costanza
TFG would have trouble remembering all his versions of the events. Hysterical!!😅😅😅
cant even look her in the eye when answering!
How does Kaitlan keep a straight face???? 99% of educated people would have said "Are you effing kidding me??" She is very professional.
Watching these two reminds me of a giraffe towering over a rhino. 😸
His actions demonstrated, he did. Louis Dejoy, and Trump moved fast to tempered with mail in ballots. A clear sign, they knew Trump wasn't the People's choice
He is very shrood Barr is still protecting Trump
He is talking now to save his hide.. Include him
Bill Barr, super Catholic, signed off on multiple executions before Xmas. Catholic of the Year Award. A real piece of work.
Petty wasn’t it. Just one of the million reasons he was a bad choice
Can you see Barr's 2 faces.......give me a break....
The only advice trump listened to was the my pillow guy & leaky die hair Guliani
Kaitlyn is improving. Keep asking those tough questions! You go girl.
Unless you have a mind reading machine that can read Trump's mind, this case is going nowhere. It's a bogus case to begin with.
that is ridiculous to be able to lie and that is first amendment protected they are saying if you say fire in a theater and there is no fire then that is protected or you call nine one one and say a lie that is protected then
If the government outlawed lying, that would mean the government could target poitlical parties and establish tyranny.
Billy you all but tried to steal it yourself until team crazy got a hold of the steering wheel. So piss off, you jumped into a life boat at the last second.
Why would you give him the time of day! His comments beating around the bush is trying to screw up case.