What is shared consciousness? | Lisa Miller
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 авг 2023
- Do humans share one consciousness? This psychologist says yes.
❍ Subscribe to The Well on RUclips: bit.ly/welcometothewell
❍ Up next: How your brain creates reality • How your brain creates...
Clinical psychologist Lisa Miller rejects a materialist view of the brain as a factory producing thoughts. She believes that the brain might function more like an antenna - capable of sending and receiving consciousness, which holds information, love, and intelligence. In other words, consciousness can exist independently of matter.
Miller highlights scientific research that has explored this idea of shared consciousness, particularly in bonded relationships and among twins. She emphasizes the interconnectedness of humanity, where our actions and treatment of others leave lasting imprints on a collective consciousness field.
Miller wants to redefine how we understand human consciousness and interconnectedness. This view of our minds has implications for fields such as psychology, neuroscience, and spirituality: by recognizing our shared consciousness, we can live a less lonely and more mindful shared existence.
Read the full video transcript: bigthink.com/the-well/shared-...
You can find Lisa's peer-reviewed research articles on her faculty page at the Teachers College - Columbia University website, here: www.tc.columbia.edu/faculty/l...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
❍ About The Well ❍
Do we inhabit a multiverse? Do we have free will? What is love? Is evolution directional? There are no simple answers to life’s biggest questions, and that’s why they’re the questions occupying the world’s brightest minds.
So what do they think?
How is the power of science advancing understanding? How are philosophers and theologians tackling these fascinating questions?
Let’s dive into The Well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The Well on your favorite platforms:
❍ Facebook: bit.ly/thewellFB
❍ Instagram: bit.ly/thewellIG 
Наука
If there is indeed peer-reviewed research behind what she is saying then this ought to be one of the biggest news, at least in scientific spheres.
Doesn't seem there are evidences. The cases she talked about, mother-son, twins, are mere coincidence, and not yet confirmed by science with actual test results. This is yet a theory.
Rupert Sheldrake has been saying this since 1980
Jeffery Schwartz MD has similar research results regarding consciousness and neurology. Critics need to do some more homework on this field. Their findings are indeed exciting.
Such peer-reviewed research is thousands of years old, but the religion of materialism doesnt like it, so it burns that knowledge.
@@ROForeverManI didn't think the method of peer review in research was older than some hundreds of years (as stated by Melinda Baldwin, American Institute of Physics, for example). What is your source that peer review in science is thousands of years old?
My mom has a twin brother. We had moved overseas away from him, and my mom broke her wrist. He called frantically asking why his wrist felt weird… before we told him what happened
Whenever the claim 'more and more scientists are...' is invoked, it immediately raises red flags for me. Such a statement implies a shifting scientific consensus, which, in the case of consciousness originating from the brain, is simply not accurate. The anecdote of a mother waking up in fear as her son is shot in a warzone is compelling but should not be mistaken for scientific evidence of shared consciousness. It's crucial to consider the broader context. How many nights has the same mother awoken in fear, only to find her son unharmed? Conversely, how many soldiers experience harm without any such 'awakening' from their mothers? Both scenarios are statistically likely to occur independently; their coincidental occurrence does not constitute empirical evidence. Thus, despite Miller's assertions, there is currently no substantive evidence supporting the concept of shared consciousness
👏
Who gives a fuck, let the woman share her ideas!!! Geez. Funny that the woman who spoke about black holes in a past video didn’t mention any studies but there wasn’t comments like that. Read the Gateway Experience report, by CIA
This phenomenon isn't the only one where obstinate materialistic reductionism, completely bites the dust. Near death experiences... A 2015 paper in the National Library of Medicine published by Dr. Eben Alexander III MD, starts with interesting words from the famous Nobel prize winner Sir John C. Eccles, and then follows with some interesting words of his own regarding this issue:
_“I maintain that the human mystery is incredibly demeaned by scientific reductionism, with its claim in promissory materialism to account eventually for all of the spiritual world in terms of patterns of neuronal activity. This belief must be classed as a superstition. . . . we have to recognize that we are spiritual beings with souls existing in a spiritual world as well as material beings with bodies and brains existing in a material world.”_
_- Sir John C. Eccles, PhD (1903 - 1997), neurophysiologist, Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology, 1963_
...(Goes on),
...
The conventional neuroscientific assertion that the brain creates the “illusion” of consciousness through the physical action of the subatomic particles, atoms, molecules and cells of the brain, so fundamental to Dr. Nelson’s point of view, is, as the Australian neurophysiologist and Nobel Laureate Sir John C. Eccles (quoted at beginning of article) famously said, “a superstition.” Dr. Nelson and other physicalists are incapable of meeting the empirical challenges posed by the empirical data from NDEs, out-of body experiences (OBEs) and all manner of related mystical experiences. They neglect or deliberately ignore these “inconvenient” empirical facts, or attempt to explain away the basic rudiments through simplistic elementary explanations that cannot even begin to elucidate the rich landscape of the actual experiences.
Well said..
A “shifting scientific consensus” is the lot of scientific progress. That takes place at varying rates. That’s been established.
What is felt about that is irrelevant. It would be the same sort of “skepticism” (really a feeling) that was a part of the struggle in establishing the existence of microbial life as fact, back in the day. That skepticism was irrelevant to the nature of that fact. Scientific inquiry is nowhere without creativity and that’s antithetical to mulling around in prime skepticism.
That’s a red flag 🚩 that haunts scientific inquiry ad nauseum. Constructive criticism promotes study, not the peevishness of “skepticism”, which is the construction of a egotistical approach to objective inquiry and analysis. Scientism is all the rage because of this. Pay little attention to the standard skeptics 🧐 . The only time they listen is when their own funding 💴 of research 🔬 is in jeopardy. Then, they find “magical” 🪄 creativity ✨ almost instantaneously. Theoretical physicist, medicine, biomedical engineering, etc, rely on pushing theoretical and hypothetical limits with observational input being a source. Those that want to scoff at that, should be of concern.
There's a huge range of anecdotal evidence on this subject, but the way this video presents it undermines the credibility of the topic. As other commenters have said, i would love to see some more credible research in this area
Check out The Conscious Universe by Dean Radin, he uses meta-analysis
One night at 2am I suddenly could not breath, couldn't catch a breath. Next morning I found out my grandfather had respiratory arrest at the exact same time that I couldn't breath.
Thought provoking and wide open for skepticism. As someone else wrote in another comment: how many times does that mother wakes up alert to find her soldier son is ok? And how many soldiers find themselves wounded and their mother keeps sleeping soundly?
I would also question when she says that 70% of scientist say their ideas come from intuition and some divine source. First where does she get this from? Second the existence of intuition doesn’t demonstrate in itself the existence of the divine; I could say that intuition is subconscious process result of experience in a particular field and soft skills that allows to generate ideas and imagine patterns that someone without that experience or who isn’t actively working on a series of studies, processes or experiments wouldn’t.
It is a lovely thought, though, that this gets studied and we find more and more insights about this.
This is so cool. As Lisa was talking about bonding as a sharing of consciousness, it made me think about the more negative aspect of that, or trauma bonding. Psychologists like Sam Vaknin speak about the abusive interject that is installed in the victim's mind in an abusive relationship. The victims experience intrusive thoughts that bully, demean, and gaslight them, often in the voice or vocabulary of their perpetrator. Even when the abuser is physically nowhere near them, these abusive interjects can continue to haunt and override the victim's mind. As a survivor of abuse myself, I experienced this when I finally left the environment, and though the cruel voices have quited down significantly, they sometimes still arise (a part of me wonders if its becuase the abuser is channeling those negative thought forms toward me just by virtue of their resentment..). I think where people often get stuck in their healing is getting identified with those abusive interjects and gradually believing they are innately a bad object. It really is as though the abuser installed part of their hateful consciousness into you. Lisa's closing words about the importance of choosing your environments wisely and honouring the sacred space of your mind could not be more poignant. Whether you like it or not, the energies you interact with on a daily basis enter your psychic field and colour your experience. Discerning, choosing and aligning yourself with positive energy in your environment is so important to your wellbeing. The quote, "you create the world with your mind, but first the world creates your mind", just drives that point home. If your long-term sanity is of any concern to you, you simply cannot take your surroundings for granted. Awesome video!
Thanks for the video!
I would be interested to read the scientific research she mentions. Where can I find it?
Generally, I think it would be useful to put references in the description.
Gateway Experience, conducted by CIA
Thanks for watching! You can find Lisa's peer-reviewed research articles on her faculty page on Teachers College - Columbia University website. Much of what she addresses here draws from those research papers, as well as her books. We will also add this to the description!
yeah, really disappointed with the chanel, unsubscribed
@@mind5403 You dont know to use gogle.
Her research reminds me of the work by Jeffery Schwartz MD on consciousness and neuroplasticity. This is serious research that challenges our previous assumptions about the nature of reality.
Why all this tired, unsubstantiated bollocks? This very channel shows Michael Levin as well, who offers fresh, evidence based insights. That is exciting stuff
Dk why they keep bringing these pseudoscientific hippies back on
I used to think my brain was just full of random thoughts. Little did I know, it's actually a shared consciousness!
Show me these studies. Robert Sapulski says consciousness isn’t even real. This is intresting stuff but it’s also triggering my bullshit meter “more scientists are” ok what scientists are we talking about? Context matters
You spelled his name wrong. There’s one called Gateway Experience, by the CIA
This phenomenon isn't the only one where obstinate materialistic reductionism, completely bites the dust. Near death experiences... A 2015 paper in the National Library of Medicine published by Dr. Eben Alexander III MD, starts with interesting words from the famous Nobel prize winner Sir John C. Eccles, and then follows with some interesting words of his own regarding this issue:
_“I maintain that the human mystery is incredibly demeaned by scientific reductionism, with its claim in promissory materialism to account eventually for all of the spiritual world in terms of patterns of neuronal activity. This belief must be classed as a superstition. . . . we have to recognize that we are spiritual beings with souls existing in a spiritual world as well as material beings with bodies and brains existing in a material world.”_
_- Sir John C. Eccles, PhD (1903 - 1997), neurophysiologist, Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology, 1963_
...(Goes on),
...
The conventional neuroscientific assertion that the brain creates the “illusion” of consciousness through the physical action of the subatomic particles, atoms, molecules and cells of the brain, so fundamental to Dr. Nelson’s point of view, is, as the Australian neurophysiologist and Nobel Laureate Sir John C. Eccles (quoted at beginning of article) famously said, “a superstition.” Dr. Nelson and other physicalists are incapable of meeting the empirical challenges posed by the empirical data from NDEs, out-of body experiences (OBEs) and all manner of related mystical experiences. They neglect or deliberately ignore these “inconvenient” empirical facts, or attempt to explain away the basic rudiments through simplistic elementary explanations that cannot even begin to elucidate the rich landscape of the actual experiences.
You mean you are not real ? =)))))))))))
While it is by no means consensus, it is indeed true that more and more scientists and philosophers are turning to a consciousness based paradigm. Check out the work of Donald Hoffman, Bernardo Kastrup, Phillip Goff, Galen Strawson, Steve Taylor, Tony Nader, John Hagelin, or Amit Goswami.
While I stay skeptical of many individual instances, I’ve experienced enough to buy the general notions she’s talking about. Just like I’m willing to believe life exists outside of this planet, but that doesn’t mean every farmer with a crop circle photo is legit.
That’s a good way to view all this
Sounds like we’re back to the ESP days. Super soft ‘science’.
I have often wondered why "science" is viewed as superior to intuitive knowledge, which is consciousness. Science can only attempt at best to explain the phenomenon of connectedness. "Soft science" is a derogatory term, indicative of limited insight. Did the Dr Miller not explain how "hard science" proved with measurable, "peer reviewed" data what "soft science" have known for ages??
@@idameyer5530 science is reproducible by any observer. Meaning if I do something in the US and get one result, it can be repeated in China and they will get the same result. It’s the gold standard for truths. If you use intuition for truth it’s only true for one person. It’s not true for everyone therefore not held to the same level of truth. For example Donald Trump feels that he didn’t loose the election in 2020. He tells everyone that is his truth. But to the objective world, it’s false. He is not president. The votes were counted many times, it was argued in court and it’s false. True to him, but otherwise not true. Intuition is personal and a good quality of the human brain. But often wrong. Many folks have horrid intuition and it costs them their lives.
@@idameyer5530because “intuition” isn’t really reliable for knowing reality. A lot of people say they “know” things just based on “a feeling” and they are provably wrong. That doesn’t mean what this lady is talking about can’t be true, but we can’t know just based on feelings, we have to test it to see if it’s actually real.
@@CampingforCool41 if you listen to the video again you will hear that it has indeed been proven by neuroscientific testing.
This has been common knowledge in every culture except the twentieth century western paradigm which is an anomaly in its rejection of the intuitive experience. One can be happy that at least the nihilism of western academia generated this investigation and led themselves back to what we've always known. This woman is correct in each assertion.
The exploding science in neurology is so absolutely exciting and fascinating to me. The example of the mother and her soldier son, and the twins is something I’ve heard for decades. It’s nice to see that the science is catching up to these anecdotes we’ve heard for years and didn’t know if there was any empirical data to support the stories or if they were just hyperbole. I would like to see more citations, however.
So glad you enjoyed! You can find Lisa's peer-reviewed research articles on her faculty page on Teachers College - Columbia University website. Much of what she addresses here draws from those research papers, as well as her books
@mind5403 You didnt look anywhere. Why do you lie ?
Lol I'm going to look right now. If they exist I'll be fascinated. If they don't I'll be disappointed.
@@The-WellLink please. I couldn't find it. What is a peer reviewed article? The same as a peer reviewed scientific paper?
It's a fascinating theory. My great uncles were twins, and when one died of a heart attack, the other twin had anxiety like attack but didn't know why. They were on the opposite side of the city at the time.
It’s like when you love someone and you know that they know
😂😂😂
Whatever the term is, it does not matter. I have experienced it. As recently as yesterday. But for that, we need to be empty of any pre conceived thoughts and baggages. We have to become an open channel for the communication to flow thru us.
What kind of scientist use the expression "sacred field of life"?
Life is the most sacred thing for life scientists usually
Scientists are allowed to have faith and/or believe in metaphysics. They aren't computers and that doesn't discredit them. Even Einstein had unprovable thoughts on the universe.
Beyond that, science doesn't and never has, claimed to have all the answers.
Take the scientific theory, which is too honest a take for common parlance. It's not law because we acknowledge that there is more we can learn, even if that unknown amount of knowledge is trivial. We know that gravity exists. We can calculate it with extremely great accuracy. We have so much evidence it's damn near irrefutable. In almost every regard it can be considered law. But we know that we don't know everything about it, so, Bam, Theory of gravity.
Science is a process, a reduction of many points of view to their most common denominator, to deduce what is objective. It isnt a cheat code, it's still an active quest.
Now thinking of consciousness as if it inhabits it's own quantum-like field IS intriguing.
In physics now everything is a field, the Higgs field, gravitational field, consciousness field, a field where mathematics is the ultimate reality, and she's proposing a field where the sacred is ultimate reality. She has about as much proof for her idea as physicists have for the graviton, dark matter and dark energy, so I'd say she's much like every other scientist.
@@gettingstuffdoneright5332 Everybody experience gravity everyday but there's no such thing as a "sacred field", and nothing is sacred in science. This is metaphysical non-sense, not science
Beautiful information, I had envisioned two ideas which are implemented by others as a product. Which says our thoughts transmitted. I believe in this as I have experienced.
Lol and here I am thinking that the fundamental limitation of our knowledge and living experiences is that consciousness is contained
Shared consciousness is a gigantic claim, if there's anything to it we should devote a great effort to bring this understanding to light, but that's a big if
Not sure that this clip defends a convincing case, but consciousness is so mysterious and salient, who knows what else we'll find out about it
I've been a spiritual practitioner for a quarter century and I've experienced some of what she's referring to. I still have to ask myself if what I'm experiencing is some sort of psychic phenomenon or some combination of mirror neurons and an active imagination. I would like to see some established science on the topic.
Isaac Asimov wrote about this phenomenon. It's amazing how much his stories predicted
In Hinduism there is a concept spiritual journey when a person can take out sole from his or her body and go here and there travel in space times and places where no one can rich but the physical body remains at the same place. Hinduism is always ahead of the science .😊
reducible to behaviorism, all of her points, and then she resorted to mysticism through material points of contact
nikola tesla reported having inventions revealed to him in dreams or spontaneously in mental images. some would he in their full, completed form. from these he would create the actual design he had been shown. i do wish she would reference some actual peer-reviewed studies rather than talk in generalities.
In StarCraft, we call it “The overmind” 😂
Osho had said this many times in his various discourses. Also would like you to explore Indian Upanishads and Vedas where this has been mentioned thousands of years ago.
Beautifully presented🌹🌹🌹
Me and my friend had a legitimate few minutes tonight prob like 15 that we shared the same consciousness it was very awakening like I knew this was possible and it’s very rare but it’s almost freeing when you find a kindred spirit out there but it is possible to live and share thoughts and ideas and shared experiences between more than one person just imagine how good this world could be if we just all do better because ultimately we are all one.
If your son is on a battlefront, what mother wakes up worried only on the day of a catastrophe?
I'd like an explanation of consciousness existing as matter, if you don't mind sharing. I would also like to hear your thoughts on "if societal changes cause mankind to lose this ability" Just a note I actually live very much in this state.
I only have to think about my youngest son and he will call. It only works with him, though, no one else. I will often just send him a mental message to call me and within minutes he does!
We should definitely test that in the lab, if your claim is true a whole new field of study opens up
@@d716agq
I _used_ to have that kind of connection with my mom, but not for decades. Not since I fell _out_ of love with her... 🤔
I've talked to others that have this sort of connection, too. I'm sure science will one day figure it out.
Fantastic!
Maybe not,i don't think the brain is anthem, although the brain can communicate to the outside,in and out, and we can sync our brains with verbal and physical communication
I'm a skeptic in the way I approach most things, but I agree with her based on personal experiences. I have felt that there is a consciousness in the universe itself which sometimes allows me to see things through the minds of others. There have been instances where I have accurately predicted things through dreams that felt profound throughout my life. It's not often, but it happens and has me questioning free will and the nature of time. I'm an atheist when it comes to religious deities, but can see the possibility that the universe itself is conscious and that all life is a part of that consciousness.
Why don’t you search Islam and Sufism… Sufism exclusively teaches the inner and core values of Islam based of unity of the universe. It’s a very broad perspective to those matters. You may enjoy 😊
These wild claims about the "elegant design" of the brain and the disingenuous implication that meditation causes neuron growth through extra-physical/spiritual means have not been evidenced and directly go against the current understanding of how the brain evolved and how it works.
this is an honest conversation
Consciousness is not contained or observable, it is what observes.
The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao.
what. not contained? consciousness IS observable ive been observing that only. so.
I'm really interested in the theory expressed here. I'm closely following the experiments being done by Dean Radin and The Institute of Noetic Science.
Science criticises religion not realising they are staring at a reflection of themselves. Both are dogmatic and intolerant of suggestions that do not align with their own biases and/or experiences. I am agnostic. I do not know if what Dr Miller is proposing has the potential for truth. But looking through these comments, seeing criticisms of spirituality and Dr Miller's unconventional thinking, it makes me so frustrated that so many are narrow-minded. If I'm to recall correctly, some of the most important ideas in science have, during their times, been highly controversial.
Which pieces of her research relate to her claims?
I can't see any, but I'd like to.
Is it just me or do none of her peer reviewed articles on her page have anything to do with what is being said here.
She made quite a few claims about studies that "had been done" that showed these connections. Can we get links to them?
Fun to watch conjectures 🤷♂😁
How shall we call the particle for the consciousness field? Do we need a new particle accelerator? 😆😆
"There are neural correlates.. that go hand in hand with trancendent awareness"
It is true that psychological phenomenon have been found to have neural correlates. This is not surprising under a physical view of the brain and any claims of "Transcendent Awareness" are disingenuously using the word trancendent to imply an extra-physical phenomenon that has not been evidenced.
It's a very beautiful worldview, but for extraordinary claims you need extraordinary evidence, I'm still waiting for that evidence.
I've been saying this since childhood & now in my almost mid-fifties I can write a book on all the experiences I've had that would prove her theory to be true. This is why I am excited about the teachings of Agape International Spiritual Center out of LA they teach this, and walk the walk a trans-denominational community, where science & spirituality entwine
this title of the video is so true.. ive witnessing it since
I love the way she explains this. It's so.. captivating!
this is already known by yogis for thousands of years, its not shared, it is One. consciousness is not something you can share because its Whole. I'm not saying don't share, or look into scientific explanations because that's what creation is about. yin and yang making unity in form and formless
Could you please tell me where is the emisor/receiver area of the brain? Like the Wi-Fi system
🤣
Did she just say that phones "pull information out of thin air"?! 🤨
That's not how it works. We can explain how that works, because we made it. You need to do the same with this shared consciousness stuff. Sounds an awful lot like BS to me
Its all pure deterministic but the rules of determinism we know of are not complete ... We do not know a lot of unknown unknowns..
I feel that my limited understanding of the life principle or divine spark that can combine inorganic matter in such a way that anything becoming alive is a total mystery to me. All I can not image or understand how our planet has such a variety of living things in it isn't alive its self. My digestive track transforms food from complex compounds into basic stuff for the rest of my body to use. I forget how many things (I think bacteria) living inside me with their own DNA separate from mine are essential to keep the rest of me alive. Boggles my mind. I also can not get passed the fact that we live in or planet and not on our planet. I can not resist the temptation to claim things as mine. I wonder if the other things living inside me do the same thing and greedily claim amongst themselves how important each individual digestive unit is unique and special. Moving around at the bottom of the fluid ocean of our atmosphere, I wonder about the living things moving at the bottom of the fluid of the ocean floor where the pressure is immense. I also wonder how can it be that the center of this planet is supposed to be hotter that the sun. I've heard of absolute zero but what happens at the other side where it's so hot matter does what?? Melt, boil, change into what? I'm grateful for thoughtful people being curious enough to look for answers. But for me it leads to more questions. I wish I had the time and ability to ponder such things but I have to go mow the grass in my yard before it gets to hot outside.
For anyone interested in consciousness, see my papers like "Meaning and Context: A Brief Introduction" by Cosmin Visan, CERN physicist.
What's it like working at CERN, what do you do there &, who is the smartest person there?
I always hear estimates of the amounts of dark matter & dark energy but how can any know the specific amounts of each or that there are 2 kinds at all?
@@robdeskrd There are no such things. There is only consciousness.
What is there to do...then?
Ive seen five videos from the same woman, they all say the same thing over and over again, preaching but never explaining fundemental processes. If the brain is an antena, where is the information that is recieved processed and stored?
What frequency does my brain have to be to understand?
Human brains are realy good at probability. If you are close to someone and you are aware of their general situation, could this not be explained buy reasoned guesses? I would very much like to see hard evidence of this 'transmitter' ability.
2 months ago my home burnt down at 5am. My wife and I got out less than 60secs before the roof collapsed on our room.
It took me 3 days to get a phone to contact my family (phone, wallet, purse, car keys, everything was lost in the fire).
Once I touched base in the family chat my brother UNLOADED on me for being unreachable, he didn't even read the walls of text I left, just saw I was texting and let his feelings fly.
Turns out 3 days before that text at 5am he woke up so fast, it woke his wife and he just knew something was REALLY wrong with me.
My brother and I are both level headed to a fault, we got logic behind every move we do. Everything is thought out. Every. thing. I got 3 years on him, we aren't twins.
We can't explain this. It might be anecdotal, but it's a real as the sun rising, and if an inquisition told me to renounce my words or die, then I'd die. I won't deny reality and live in some fantasy world, no matter how uncomfortable it might make me, or anyone else.
Humans are terrible at probability
This is true but there’s a benefit to detaching from these concepts. The separation between external and internal has not always existed and is largely unnecessary.
Shes mixes actual science and 🐂 💩 mysticism "convincingly" but all within the same chain of thought, and thats raises red flags... saying we have a better understanding of how consciousness arrises is one thing but waffling about mystical sacred fields is simply outside the scientific mainstream.
Anyone interested in this should consider reading The Conscious Universe by Dean Radin
And they say Psychology is a soft science…
Ikr
I wanted to leave a negative comment as soon as I heard “Post-Materialism” but I figured I’d hear her out until the end of the video.
Her view seems deeply unscientific and full of bias towards a spiritual worldview. Maybe it’s my own bias talking here, but I’m surprised someone with these views are platformed without any sources or studies supporting such wild claims. Most of the things that support her idea of consciousness being linked are anecdotal at best and to extrapolate to saying “consciousness can exist independent of matter” is a big stretch.
During life, the mind and body are one. The mechanism of bonding may still have physical links.
Typical psedo science speaker that likes to quote "research" with quiet outstanding "findings", but ignores the fact such experiments always fail to be replicated under strict research criteria. The study of dead salmon in fMRI responding to pictures is a reminder that not all "research" is created equal.
“independent of matter” what? ima need a source on this lol
She does know cell phones are made out of matter right?
❤❤❤
In quantum mechanics it is called Quantum Entanglement.
Two particles always exchange information and energy, despite the distance between them.
And everything is made out of quantum. Everything communicates every single moment
Evoking quantum mechanics to justify/explain psedo science ideas is pure nonsense. It's as pure nonsensical as the evoking of vague "energies", oras, and resonance. Believe whatever you want to believe, but don't call it scientific.
I am on a mission to plead with presenters not to put music in the background. The Royal National Institute for Deaf People (RNID) state, there are 12 million people in the UK (about 1 in 6) who are deaf or have hearing loss or tinnitus. We click play to hear you and yet the music makes it so difficult to hear what you say.
Oke wheres the papers?
Evidence? Yeah, I thought so ...
Wait a few more years to see it on TV or search for it online
Gateway process by cia as a start point
I’ll check in my grocery store tabloids@@chimagamer4157
More and more scientists? Who, exactly?
Brain doesnt exist. "Brain" is just an idea in consciousness.
I think its true... Sometimes. Mothers make milk when their babies cry, even when they can't hear them. Dads have dad reflexes... You can see videos of it. But we are notoriously bad at it, too. We think people are crabby when they just have a headache; we think people are aloof when they just feel super bad and cant be very present. So, definitely there are some boundaries around this, and it is not presented well and common sense just suggests some is questionable
Poor materialists crying that their dogma is false. I shed a tear!
Lol, not really... they are just annoyed that this woman is peddling nonsense that she can't back up.
@@randomdude571 Have you heard of idealism ? Is 5000 years old. Go read books! Books makes smarts!
@ROForeverMan yes, I have... it's a stupid and unrealistic take on reality. Perhaps you should read a book or two, maybe you can get some of those smarts you're whining about.
@@randomdude571 Why ? Prove there is anything outside consciousness!
@ROForeverMan you can make that argument for literally any nonsensical claim... you could be like prove we aren't just a fart that thinks, or prove we aren't a brain in a jar, or prove we aren't in a simulation. All we have to go on is whatever our senses perceive in the outside world, find a way to measure that, classify it and compare it with other people.
I was giving this video the benefit of the doubt up until the shared consciousness in isolated boxes example. If that were true, it would be the next huge information revolution. The fact that none of the claims are substantiated in the description is a huge red flag. I've been enjoying the videos on this channel, but this forces me to unsubscribe.
More videos with this woman, please! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
More coming! Stay tuned :)
Yeah... no.
I was really enjoying The Well content. But after hearing this pseudoscience I'm going to have to go back and think a lot harder about the other Well videos I've seen.
"We all share consciousness" 😮💨😒
This desperate attempt to spiritualize everything by mixing belief with science bit is getting old. Where's Neil Degrasse Tyson or Richard Dawkins when you need them.
Who is to say whether or not everything is/can be spiritual? Who is to say whether or not ‘the spirit’ transcends modern science and permeates everything? Until we’re better able to define and differentiate levels/categories of consciousness/sentience/agency, I don’t mind considering the notion that all is ‘connected’
I think Neil and Richard would pretty much agree with Lisa. Humans see themselves often separate from nature and each other, but in fact life is one big interconnected symbiosis. Your brain is not only a supercomputer but also an antenna which picks up energy from its surroundings. Have you ever been in a concert collectively listening to music and experiencing about the same emotions? Have you ever walk into a room full with positive energy and lift up the whole atmosphere? That awareness and connection doesn’t go away when you leave the scene . Plus eventhough you are probably a couple of thousand miles away, we have increased eachothers collective consciousness ;) Have a nice day
This separation was created by Descartes and was already taken down. Get an update bro
We don't need them anymore. Read the comments. Most people seem to realize that she is spinning a bunch of BS.
Ughh...not her again. It's like DJ Khaled yelling "an another one!" 😩😩😩
#suggestion please stop making content about spirituality
This is the true goal of the Templeton foundation
Thank myself I didnt sub
I wanna know where it’s written in this channel that everything shown here has to be scientific accurate with 100 studies. People are so polarized and automatic that they can’t stand the idea of truly listening something and pay attention to whether it makes sense. They just go for the proofs of the objective view. They find themselves so smart for invoking “where are the scientific proofs” but know nothing about empiricism. What they forget is that in science history, that’s how it begins. Anyone who has been in a relationship and/or has loved agree on the idea of shared consciousness. Only the unloved disagree on that 😂
why do I feel like I have to agree with you even though I don't wanna agree with you? 😭😭
What a load of fertilizer
Exactly. People that didnt have telepathies or precognitions are those that never loved.
@@mind5403 Exactly! So prove "brain" exists!
Yea sorry, not buying it.
na this is BS science is just gonna turning to the personal beliefs
Galaxy brain garbage
Mumbai jumbo
All of this is obvious BS wishfull thinking, but more importantly: Why is this presented as facts on this channel?? I remember subscribing to a scientific channel, and this is absolutely not scientific at all
This is nonsense. This channel needs to start citing it's work smh
This is empirically debunked stuff.
Pure nonsense
Sounds like hooey
I dont like some pseudoscientific videos yall seem to have on ur channel.
This lady is confused.
When she said precognition 🤦🏾