‘The judiciary has no power to gag parliament’ - Prof. Gyampo ||The Key Points on TV3
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 окт 2024
- The judiciary has no power to gag parliament - Prof. Gyampo ||The Key Points on TV3
Don't forget to subscribe for more updates.
Visit www.3news.com/ for more.
Subscribe for more Updates: goo.gl/70xoB
TV3 First in News Best in Entertainment.
Solid argument by the professor
What solid argument'even judiciary can gag executive..if not Ghana shameless prof gyampo cannot sit on radio and talk
The S. Court has Power to stop anyone in Ghana to do right thing. Which Kind of Prof. Is this
@@andrewsmensahyeboah5943 the judiciary doesn’t have the power to decide the work of parliament.
@@princeappiah1883 you are being carried away by emotions. You listen to the professor attentively and think deeply, you will appreciate the points he put across. Indeed, he gave me a richer perspective to the issue which appreciate profoundly.
@@MegaGoodmann people won’t learn except to insult learned people. So don’t mind him.
You're a Teacher indeed
I have always had the impression that the supreme court has no power over the speaker or parliament.Is this true?
They have no right to dictate the proceedings of parliament. It's like telling your neighbour that you have decided he shouldn't lock his door at night. Empty words. Whatever you say it is not your house and you can't tell him what to do.
@amisco333 Is parliamentarians above the laws of Ghana?
Very matured lecture
Prof you right, Speaker should not submit to useless cj tukunu at supreme Court, why can't afenyo allow those independent mps to fight for themself,nonsense
Gyimie saaaa
It is the behavior of the judiciary and others is why some of us will never step foot in that village called gh. We cannot live in a country with that type of judiciary
WHY DON'T YOU ASK MIKE OKOE THIS QUESTION WHEN HE REMOVED AN MP FROM THE PARLIAMENT AFTER CROSSING CARPET?
Right on the spot, well spoken professor. You're brilliant. This is the same argument I have. Why did the former speaker of parliament allow Fomina MP to join NPP, then , that was wrong and so the court shouldn't come in at all. This is a clear example of abuse of power from both the speaker and the NPP now Bagbin has erred too.
NDC caucus and the speaker should walk out from parliament if it's decisions can't be adhere to, the judiciary had already been bought and packed for this kind of nonsense responses ... the speak with confidence because they already know the outcome of it... Please Don't Forget about the " agyapadie book" and it's ability to pack this judicial system ...
We must stand by this constitution to resist the oppressors rule ...
No, they must not walk out. Rather, they should remain resolute and stay in there. If the NPP caucus can’t stand it, they should rather go out.
The question we have to asked is that when the constitution said “ a person shall vacate his or her seat in parliament “ is the constitution saying the future parliament or the current parliament? I think if we are able to understand this basic question the rest will sort itself out
The question is a nonstarter. All 275 MPs vacate and end their seats prior to the future parliament. On the 6th of January after every election cycle, parliament doesn’t exist so what future parliament are we talking about? The future shall be occupied by the winners of the future election so what is the issue here? Are we saying Prof. Mike Okwei didn’t the difference between a future and current parliament when he gave the 2020 ruling?
Tuesday I don't expect Hon. Speaker to back down. We are tired of "showing maturity"
nppfuor mostly tell ndc go to court or they go to court themselves because kwasea kwasea akuffo addo has packed the judiciary to nppfuors advantage.
See another pig ooooo gyimie saaaa Ghana kwasiato learn sense small wai nantwiemuuuu
wo papa kwasia panyin kuraa you stupid fool respeck him. gyimi fuo mu gyimiigyimii
Professor Gyampo is a disgrace. If Joy fm was serious and not doing propaganda for the NDC, he should have absent himself from all communications, because of his sex scandal. Ghana should sit up.
That man talking is somehow making a whole lot of senses there!... 🍁
The case at hand is more consequential than the LGBT bill. The present issue directly affect the function of government whilst the latter isn’t. The mp at the forefront of the LGBT is caught on camera as saying that the LGBT is not at all important
When Jesus Christ said it's finished on the cross he was referring to your brain
There should be no Parliament
Well I don't know more but I think proof's submission is understandable
I hope he knows about conflict of interest
PROF I DO RESPECT YOU A LOT BUT IN THIS ONE IT’S VERY SUPERFICIAL ARGUMENT TO LIMIT YPUR POSITION TO BASIC GOVERNMENT ISSUE. THESE ARE MATTERS OF LEGAL CONSIDERATION. THE LAW EXISTS AND THERE’S PRECEDENT TO SUCH CONDUCT AND RULING. TO GO REGISTER TO CONTEST FOR ANOTHER PARTY FROM INDEPENDENCE STATUS OR TO VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION TO DO WHAT THEY DID TO CONTEST AS INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES WITH THEIR NEW POSITIONS ACCEPTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION WILL LEAVE NO ONE IN DOUBT THAT THEY HAVE LEFT THEIR FORMER POSITIONS. IT’S MY CONSIDERATION THAT THIS IS NOT JUST A SIMPLE SPECIFICALLY A GOVERNMENT QUESTION. IT’S A LEGAL QUESTION.
Prof. Gyampo the sex for marks man
This man doesn't know what he is talking about.....the MPs did not just declare their intention to contest but are actually contesting!!!...
He clearly doesn't understand English😂
You are talking nonsense and rubbish
Prof Gyampo at one point makes it clear that both Mike Oquay and Babin were wrong in their rulings , at the same time he condemns what the SC seeks to reverse Babin's ruling. I think Prof Gyampo must make his stands clearer.
Gyampo you talk too much. Mr know all.
Learn and stop the unnecessary criticism
The judiciary has constitutional authority to stop any illegal exercise of power by parliament or the executive. Period.
They don't have the power to do foko. Don't let the respect people try to have for them cloud your judgement of their power limit. As for judgement deɛ they can pronounce, but enforcement is the real deal. With the exception of jail term, which is carried out by the prisons service, no judge can enforce any judgement after their ruling in court. There's a difference between respect and real power or authority. Know this and know piece 😅
Ignorant
@@kingblaq100
Of course they do! That authority is granted by the Constitution, not YOU.
If it was illegal Prof. Mike quaye was wrong too
@@ekoict250
Did you or anyone challenge Prof. Quayle’s ruling in the Supreme Court?
Sex for grade professor Gyampo has no credibility anymore. He has no shame at all.
You can hardly comprehend sound debate so I won’t blame you. Childish talk from you.
Are u part of the low iQ group?
Illiterate talk, only a f00l with no argument will resort to your petty insults.
I hope you know the platform on which you are. You can't say such evil things about people anyhow without knowing in advance the consequences.
Is the sex for grade story true???