Hey everyone! Thanks for all the views and comments. I’m planning to drop videos more often (no promises on the quality though). Meanwhile, check out this video about my ongoing PURE PPF project, tailored for my graphics settings : ruclips.net/video/V01FS_-Enzo/видео.html
As the video title suggest, "Low to Medium PC..." Oh, you noticed the frame drops from recording while it's on a maxed out graphics settings? If only I had mentioned that in the video… oh wait, I did! Funny how no one else who enjoyed the tips and presets had an issue, but I guess we can’t all have super detective skills. Guess we low end peasants were chilling and enjoying the improved graphic with smooth framerate experience instead of focusing on the wrong thing.
@@PrefoX next time why don't you really watch the video before jumping into conclusion. Anyway, whatever makes you happy, mate. The presets boosts my FPS and graphic quality at the same time, nearly zero frame drops with a worse pc than the one in the video.
btw i like the style of ur video. At first i thought ur just another clickbait channel but it turned out to be really good contend and some nice editing that is fun to watch.
Thank you my friend, it kind of happen that your CSP "Preset2" combined with a little less than a middle set up to the AC graphs set up gave to my RX580/R5 3500X a good boost in quality and input lags in Shutoko server when its raining now.
Thanks for all the explanations! Dont know why the other dude hated u that much for explaining some details. keep it up! and great that unre driving this lovely sim with a gamepad 😅👍🏽
Disable --> Extra FX. I gained over 60 FPS on that one alone. Running Pure & Sol. Game looks great and now it runs great too. ( Content Manager --> Custom Shaders patch --> Extra FX )
This is awesome. I have a 1080 ti and even then 1440p is too much to max out my framerate (165 fps). I thought FSR was just to render a higher resolution to a lower resolution rather than the other way around. I also like having my bounce lighting because it adds to the immersion. So getting every bit of performance I can is nice.
At first I was skeptical, because many things seemed counter-intuitive and contradicted other tips. Based on your “Present 1 - with ExtraFX”, I changed my settings (mine are slightly higher) and gained a lot of frames (in VR). Many, many thanks! ♥♥♥ Specs: Oculus Rift S (2560*1440), R5 5600X, RTX 3060
@@digitalvei Yes. Also "Single Pass Stereo" set on "Balanced (4x MSAA)". The only thing that bothers me about my settings is that distant objects like fences or leaves on trees (on any race track) flicker extremely at a distance. The problem has to do with the low resolution of my Oculus Rift S, I think. BUT: I had once found a way to almost completely eliminate the flickering - but I can't remember how I did it back then...
@@user-jj9nx2ti3t Distance objects rendering usually has to do with "Chunks Optimizations" and in CSP Settings > General Patch Settings > CPU Optimizations, and in GPU Optimizations there's "Optimize meshes some more" and "Compress chached textures". Those parameters affecting mostly trees and somewhat unimportant objects on the track. Adjust the settings live in-game by using this keyboard shortcut: CTRL ALT ` (control, alt, hyphen dash).
Looking forward to try it. I used to use FSR but probably not in a good way as it was given me some sort of lagging. My PC is a medium high with AMD 6950 so it should work at hight settings. I ll let you know soon if it works for me as well. Cheers buddy
I also use the Render Stats utility accessed from the right menu when on track. This shows you who much stress all the different effects effect your overall FPS, This way you can hone in on the processes that are using the most CPU/GPU which then you can adjust within content managers graphical settings. Many of the settings can be adjusted and viewed in real time too
@@GT4C0 Your GPU is basically the workhorse for most of the visuals-textures, lighting, shadows, and all those shiny effects. This gets especially demanding when you crank up the CSP settings or run a custom Pure PPF preset to boost the visuals. High-res textures, particle effects, and post-processing can really give your GPU a workout. Meanwhile, the CPU handles the behind-the-scenes stuff like physics, car handling, AI (when you’re racing with other cars), and animations. The more cars on the track or detailed physics like tire wear and crashes, the more your CPU has to step up. Generally, AC leans more on the CPU when you’ve got a lot of opponents, but once you start throwing in heavy visual mods, the GPU takes on a bigger load. It’s all about finding that balance between the two.
@@digitalvei Thank you my friend, It kind of happen that your CSP "Preset2" combined with a little less than a middle set up to the AC graphs set up gave to my RX580/R5 3500X a good boost in quality and input lags in Shutoko server when its raining now.
mhm.. so Id rather run some lower graphics settings but without the use of FSR FSR makes the game look grainy and horrible, no matter what setting i use. It only looks good if u dont move. Only option i can go with would be "best" quality. My GTX 970 gives me constant 60+ fps without the use of FSR. I tested all combinations, and fidelity wise, for me its better to simply turn some things down and skip on FSR. And run everything on locked 60fps. For instance Glare can be turned down, aswell as some csp graphics settings. Otherwise overclocking will help aswell. But for real potatos the lower FSR options are defenitely important. Luckely the new pure LCS gives us all a slight FPS boost, while also looking better. :) In some games it can help to use the FPS limiter from Riva Statistics tuner (comes with MSI afterburner) Its an old trick but really works in some games. Nobody knows why, but it reduces latency and lag spikes in some games. ah and one bonus trick. We people with potato PCs have one advantage. Most of our graphics cards support SLI or Crossfire. And a 2nd gpu can often be bought for cheap. For instance could anyone run a RX 570 in crossfire or a GTX 960 in SLI and achieve pretty nice framerates for cheap. For instance a GTX 970 SLI setup runs faster then a single 980ti in AC (roughly GTX 1070 niveau) AC is one of the games that work well with 2 GPUS, or atleast with SLI as far as i know. Only drawbacks are more power consumption and heat (could be lowered if u undervolt both cards), u need a mainboard that can take 2 cards and u need to get a 2nd card and a cheap SLI / crossfire bridge and ur video memory does not stack up, so ur bound to the video memory size of a single card. positive is, that it looks damn cool. :D
Funny thing, I actually had some weird FPS drop spikes on my PC when I lowered the graphic settings (without FSR), which made no sense! I did it after seeing a friend with a similar rig getting a smooth 80+ FPS, so I copied his settings, thinking I'd be golden-but nope, mine was still as smooth as a gravel road. The kicker is, I usually get better performance than him in other games! After some trial and error, I finally sorted it out with the settings in this video. Probably had some background apps partying without my permission, or maybe my PC just decided to take the day off. Who knows? 😄
@@digitalvei yeah there are so many variables on PC. Alone AC has billions of options and combinations. And from driver to bloatware a PC can behave totally different. I did a de-bloat once and did latency tuning and disabled any telemetrics and unwanted programs, which defenitely also helps with performance. We have to press out any % possible haha.
@@Satori-Automotive True that! Glad you enjoy the video, I'm still working on the next video about car customization, a bit delayed, with bunch of works on my desk at the same time.
Hi. I applied two of your presets but they aren't the best for me, somehow the game became "laggy" for the steering wheel input, like the latency got higher. Is there a way to revert to a previous preset if it wasn't saved? Unfortunately I can't remember how exactly my CSP was set up.
You can reset to default every CSP setting, go to Settings/Custom Shader Patch and at the bottom of each CSP extension click on the Restart button. You need to do at every extension.
always safe ur settings before u try out the settings of other people no matter what u do / which game u play. Otherwise rolling everything back manually is pretty annoying and takes long. ive been there lol
I'm not sure how well this'll work for me, seeing as my game runs at 23fps at best with everything set to the lowest setting. Lmao I have what's effectively a lower-low end PC (Laptop), and I'm used to the crappy performance so I don't mind playing at 23fps, but if this helps then I'm willing to try it.
There's 3 presets to choose for, and also you can try the "Performance" mode in FSR. Some other options to consider lowering is your graphic settings and the Post-Processing Antialiasing. I would suggest use the 2nd preset without the EXTRAFX and turn off unnecessary CSP FX too. But try the 2nd preset without lowering anything first. Let me know how it goes.
@@vanderdetails.detailing. Content Manager, it's a custom launcher, not the default Kunos launcher. It improves various aspects of the game. I think you're still using the default launcher.
Never play the map my self, but according someone in the comment here, one of my 3 presets is improving the performance. Try the preset without the Extra FX.
@@digitalvei I really liked your preset. Adding 65% of blur and enabling Extra Fx with lowering the reflection intensity can be my next favourite settings. Thanks.
@digitalvei it bothered me haha, I go inside documents/assetto corsa/ cfg/extention I think it is. Then I remove those ini's start cm up again and save my previous load settings. The one you gave here are the best BTW!!! After removing and restart they are fine and settings are oké
Tried it before on the same 34" LG monitor with 2160x1440 on the video settings, doesn't make any performance difference on this same presets. I'm reminding myself that 60 to 80 is my threshold with 75 FPS limiter. Higher than 100 FPS without the limiter means that the graphic quality can still be improved via the settings to get the stable threshold.
@@RCGangstaZ Give it a try on reducing the post processing effect one step by keeping the FSR setting in quality for example, to improve the framerate. Or, disabling the GrassFX. My rig can only handle "Performance" in FSR if I'm doing the 20 AI races, but I let the other CSP & graphics options unchanged, getting 50-60 FPS with barely noticeable dropped graphic quality is good enough for this kind of races.
You are a fucking genius. I ve been trying to find good settings with my AMD beast 6950 for two years but nothing!!! A big thanks.🙏 Any chance to get your PURE link please?
Thanks. The PPF is a very old GAF Arrow Filter, I modify it by combining with bunch of .LUA scripts from other PPF which I completely forgot what's the original script taken from. I don't think it's proper to share if there's other people's work in it, not my own. But here's the original PPF link: www.overtake.gg/downloads/gaf-arrow_filter-ppfilter-for-assetto-corsa.36989/
@@digitalvei i was hoping to reach the same greatest FPS in VR but i understand is challenging even for a medium high specs like my PC. I use FSR in the graphics card here but with your settings it struggles a lot even without ExtraFX so i use my "normal" settings. Any suggestions for VR? Also is it better using capped FPS or not? Cheers again buddy
@@MarvinButterfly Haven't tried this in VR, but try turning off the DXGI, also try with the "fullscreen" enabled or disabled in graphics settings and see the difference, also turn off NeckFX, since I don't think it's any use in VR.
@@digitalvei man i really want to balance the visual and performance but thats too much 😭😭😭😭 (yes i tried). either way, do you know what cause sudden gpu and cpu usage spike when throttle input?
@@Hygix_ First, use the Render Stat app in your game and look for what's eating your resource the most. from there, you can use the info on which setting to reduce or disabled. If you're using Pure, use the Pure low-res. Not sure about the throttle input, but you might wanna try set the FXAA in Post-Processing to medium and the FSR to Performance together with the video settings in around medium.
What a great way to announce your personality and unhappiness to people. Well done. Your feedback is very valuable to the AC community. Have a little bit of fun, man.
So a mid range $2000+ PC still has lower fidelity, horrible load times, far less car models and of lower quality than a $400 PS5 with Gran Turismo 7? And from the time of being unplugged, to plugged in and racing online against others is about 2 minutes in GT7, versus a couple hours of constantly fiddling and tuning and then dealing with endless driver updates?! GT7 has basically ZERO load times, iRacing it takes so many minutes, absolutely 20+ year old issues left to fester. I think the Stockholm syndrome needs some serious antidote. Folks should be demanding more, but instead are throwing money away and defending their enslavement. male egos be trivial to manipulate, eh? When Gran Turismo offers a Pro Mode with monthly subscription for $10 a month or so for full detailed racing stats tracking and online marshaling and stewarding, folks can experience and enjoy so much more for so much less expense and frustration. You can get a full top of the line Fanatec Direct Drive+ Extreme Wheel, PS5, and GT7 ( and/or AC:C ) and save lots of money up front and so many more hours by having everything work flawlessly out of the box. Things aren't adding up, and it's time to hold folks to account and not settle or worse wastefully support it.
@@digitalvei It's all fact. How about some non toxic reality. 120hz 1440p looks and performs with better fidelity, accuracy and realism, and oh those deep puddle mirror like reflections , especially with 250hz force feedback - OUT OF THE BOX. Results from true passion just far exceed the rest. Hyper optimized quality is unmatched. AC is ok, maybe decent if you have dozens or hundreds of hours to tinker/mod more than race, some of us prefer to race people. In person 2160p or 1440p @120hz is far greater than the compressed ytube 1440p@60, but still vastly exceptional. ruclips.net/video/mZCptbhXE78/видео.html It's great to see the effort, but being aware of the fidelity and performance of the racing sims in the space is very important. The Olympics eSport racing with Gran Turismo 7 and the Mercedes virtual racing competition with iRacing, GT7 and ACC along with the Nations Cup broadcasts really show the spectacular quality and fidelity. And for the cost, it's like the ultimate deal. At the least it's a benchmark to be very aware of.
@@xDriver69x Sure thing, but my PC cost less than $500 to build, not $2000. Appreciate the tips and the laughs from the GT7 vs. AC comparison! I still hop on GT7 now and then when I'm in the mood for a more laid-back simcade experience with its limited car selection. Both games are fun in their own way and cater to different kinds of players. I’m guessing you're not up to speed with how much AC has evolved over the last decade, especially thanks to its modding community. Two people (not the developers) basically revamped the game’s visuals, realism, and alot of other aspects of the game making it a whole new experience for players worldwide. Comparing a 2014 game to a 2022 one is a bit off, but good insights, bro.
Cope more, and play with you childish toy that only retarded children find fun. If you lack the brain cells to set up assetto corsa you are retarded. Console scum
@@digitalvei he neglected to mention on top of that $120 a year he also has to pay for ps+ so thats another $80, beings gt7 released in 2022 thats $400 in subscriptions and $400 for the console, not exactly a well rounded argument, gotta love console gamers for their ignorance.
![Yeat & Quavo - 5BRAZY [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4XxnTAwyxus/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey everyone! Thanks for all the views and comments. I’m planning to drop videos more often (no promises on the quality though). Meanwhile, check out this video about my ongoing PURE PPF project, tailored for my graphics settings : ruclips.net/video/V01FS_-Enzo/видео.html
well you can see bad frametimes in the video itself... fps isn't everything. and a 570 extreme low end nowadays
As the video title suggest, "Low to Medium PC..." Oh, you noticed the frame drops from recording while it's on a maxed out graphics settings? If only I had mentioned that in the video… oh wait, I did! Funny how no one else who enjoyed the tips and presets had an issue, but I guess we can’t all have super detective skills. Guess we low end peasants were chilling and enjoying the improved graphic with smooth framerate experience instead of focusing on the wrong thing.
@@PrefoX next time why don't you really watch the video before jumping into conclusion. Anyway, whatever makes you happy, mate. The presets boosts my FPS and graphic quality at the same time, nearly zero frame drops with a worse pc than the one in the video.
16:12 @@PrefoX
the fact you were able to hold a stable framerate and record... real testament of these settings!
Good job dude!
I appreciate you taking your time and explaining the important concepts
Really nice video and I'm super impressed by the FPS I'm gettting with your pre-sets!! Good work.
btw i like the style of ur video. At first i thought ur just another clickbait channel but it turned out to be really good contend
and some nice editing that is fun to watch.
Thank you my friend, it kind of happen that your CSP "Preset2" combined with a little less than a middle set up to the AC graphs set up gave to my RX580/R5 3500X a good boost in quality and input lags in Shutoko server when its raining now.
Thanks for all the explanations! Dont know why the other dude hated u that much for explaining some details. keep it up! and great that unre driving this lovely sim with a gamepad 😅👍🏽
Thanks, and that's not a dude, just a Karen in disguise. Blocked for easily offended by a video that he could just easily skip.
Disable --> Extra FX. I gained over 60 FPS on that one alone. Running Pure & Sol. Game looks great and now it runs great too. ( Content Manager --> Custom Shaders patch --> Extra FX )
Yup. And the preset without Extra FX is already included in the download.
Will try these next time I'm on, watched the video and learnt some stuff 👍
Good to hear, have fun.
@@digitalvei yeah, thanks for the info, I find csp a minefield of abbreviations that I have no idea what they stand for.
Thanks again
5900X + 2070 Super on triple 1080p here
Thank you for the settings! Improved my graphical performance dramatically.
You're welcome, thanks for the view :)
This is awesome. I have a 1080 ti and even then 1440p is too much to max out my framerate (165 fps). I thought FSR was just to render a higher resolution to a lower resolution rather than the other way around. I also like having my bounce lighting because it adds to the immersion. So getting every bit of performance I can is nice.
I have a potato computer but also have a potato screen so I can play with high-end graphics pretty easily.
At first I was skeptical, because many things seemed counter-intuitive and contradicted other tips. Based on your “Present 1 - with ExtraFX”, I changed my settings (mine are slightly higher) and gained a lot of frames (in VR). Many, many thanks! ♥♥♥ Specs: Oculus Rift S (2560*1440), R5 5600X, RTX 3060
Glad you enjoyed it. Btw, do you have the MODE TWEAKS : VR active in CSP settings?
@@digitalvei Yes. Also "Single Pass Stereo" set on "Balanced (4x MSAA)". The only thing that bothers me about my settings is that distant objects like fences or leaves on trees (on any race track) flicker extremely at a distance. The problem has to do with the low resolution of my Oculus Rift S, I think. BUT: I had once found a way to almost completely eliminate the flickering - but I can't remember how I did it back then...
@@user-jj9nx2ti3t Distance objects rendering usually has to do with "Chunks Optimizations" and in CSP Settings > General Patch Settings > CPU Optimizations, and in GPU Optimizations there's "Optimize meshes some more" and "Compress chached textures". Those parameters affecting mostly trees and somewhat unimportant objects on the track. Adjust the settings live in-game by using this keyboard shortcut: CTRL ALT ` (control, alt, hyphen dash).
Thank you !! what an FPS boost I got !
Appreciate this video
You just helped me a lot I think appreciate you left a like❤
At which FPS would you recommend to set the Frame Limiter? Thx for the awesome vid
I usually subtract -20 to -30 from the maximum FPS that I reached. In my game, I set it to 75, but the indicator would show me 79.
@@digitalvei Appreciate it! I've already loaded your settings and this weekend I will give a try! Thank you 🙏🏻
@@Shepherd.44 cool, let me know how it goes.
Looking forward to try it.
I used to use FSR but probably not in a good way as it was given me some sort of lagging.
My PC is a medium high with AMD 6950 so it should work at hight settings.
I ll let you know soon if it works for me as well.
Cheers buddy
Sure thing, post the update here.
I also use the Render Stats utility accessed from the right menu when on track. This shows you who much stress all the different effects effect your overall FPS, This way you can hone in on the processes that are using the most CPU/GPU which then you can adjust within content managers graphical settings. Many of the settings can be adjusted and viewed in real time too
Indeed, it can be use as the baseline of the stuff that eats the resource more.
Can we have a little most of your knowledge to know about what demands more CPU vs GPU?
@@GT4C0 Your GPU is basically the workhorse for most of the visuals-textures, lighting, shadows, and all those shiny effects. This gets especially demanding when you crank up the CSP settings or run a custom Pure PPF preset to boost the visuals. High-res textures, particle effects, and post-processing can really give your GPU a workout. Meanwhile, the CPU handles the behind-the-scenes stuff like physics, car handling, AI (when you’re racing with other cars), and animations. The more cars on the track or detailed physics like tire wear and crashes, the more your CPU has to step up. Generally, AC leans more on the CPU when you’ve got a lot of opponents, but once you start throwing in heavy visual mods, the GPU takes on a bigger load. It’s all about finding that balance between the two.
@@digitalvei Thank you my friend, It kind of happen that your CSP "Preset2" combined with a little less than a middle set up to the AC graphs set up gave to my RX580/R5 3500X a good boost in quality and input lags in Shutoko server when its raining now.
mhm.. so Id rather run some lower graphics settings but without the use of FSR
FSR makes the game look grainy and horrible, no matter what setting i use. It only looks good if u dont move. Only option i can go with would be "best" quality.
My GTX 970 gives me constant 60+ fps without the use of FSR.
I tested all combinations, and fidelity wise, for me its better to simply turn some things down and skip on FSR. And run everything on locked 60fps.
For instance Glare can be turned down, aswell as some csp graphics settings.
Otherwise overclocking will help aswell.
But for real potatos the lower FSR options are defenitely important.
Luckely the new pure LCS gives us all a slight FPS boost, while also looking better. :)
In some games it can help to use the FPS limiter from Riva Statistics tuner (comes with MSI afterburner)
Its an old trick but really works in some games. Nobody knows why, but it reduces latency and lag spikes in some games.
ah and one bonus trick. We people with potato PCs have one advantage. Most of our graphics cards support SLI or Crossfire.
And a 2nd gpu can often be bought for cheap. For instance could anyone run a RX 570 in crossfire or a GTX 960 in SLI and achieve pretty nice framerates for cheap.
For instance a GTX 970 SLI setup runs faster then a single 980ti in AC (roughly GTX 1070 niveau)
AC is one of the games that work well with 2 GPUS, or atleast with SLI as far as i know.
Only drawbacks are more power consumption and heat (could be lowered if u undervolt both cards), u need a mainboard that can take 2 cards and u need to get a 2nd card and a cheap SLI / crossfire bridge and ur video memory does not stack up, so ur bound to the video memory size of a single card.
positive is, that it looks damn cool. :D
Funny thing, I actually had some weird FPS drop spikes on my PC when I lowered the graphic settings (without FSR), which made no sense! I did it after seeing a friend with a similar rig getting a smooth 80+ FPS, so I copied his settings, thinking I'd be golden-but nope, mine was still as smooth as a gravel road. The kicker is, I usually get better performance than him in other games! After some trial and error, I finally sorted it out with the settings in this video. Probably had some background apps partying without my permission, or maybe my PC just decided to take the day off. Who knows? 😄
@@digitalvei yeah there are so many variables on PC. Alone AC has billions of options and combinations.
And from driver to bloatware a PC can behave totally different. I did a de-bloat once and did latency tuning and disabled any telemetrics and unwanted programs, which defenitely also helps with performance. We have to press out any % possible haha.
@@Satori-Automotive True that! Glad you enjoy the video, I'm still working on the next video about car customization, a bit delayed, with bunch of works on my desk at the same time.
hi man, what software do you use for your ai voice?
It's play.ht
I've got this annoying issue related to the driver names, after applying your CSP configuration, whether I enable or disable yet doesn't shows for me.
In the Custom Shaders Patch - GUI, I changed the "New Driver Tag" size to 0% to completely remove it, change it to any size to make it visible.
Hi. I applied two of your presets but they aren't the best for me, somehow the game became "laggy" for the steering wheel input, like the latency got higher. Is there a way to revert to a previous preset if it wasn't saved? Unfortunately I can't remember how exactly my CSP was set up.
That I'm not sure, try disabling the DXGI first, and see how it goes. And also I don't think you can revert to an unsaved one.
And try the link here to reset to the CSP Defaults: acstuff.ru/s/IHXyoq
You can reset to default every CSP setting, go to Settings/Custom Shader Patch and at the bottom of each CSP extension click on the Restart button. You need to do at every extension.
always safe ur settings before u try out the settings of other people
no matter what u do / which game u play. Otherwise rolling everything back manually is pretty annoying and takes long.
ive been there lol
From 110fps to 230😎🤯 thanks
Damn, I want your NASA PC man! What's the spec?
@@digitalvei medium pc++ 😁
@@jvsvmvsv that evil grin
@@digitalvei i5 9400F, TUF B360+ Gaming, RTX 2060 Super, 16Gt RAM
@@jvsvmvsv Neat spec!
I'm not sure how well this'll work for me, seeing as my game runs at 23fps at best with everything set to the lowest setting. Lmao
I have what's effectively a lower-low end PC (Laptop), and I'm used to the crappy performance so I don't mind playing at 23fps, but if this helps then I'm willing to try it.
There's 3 presets to choose for, and also you can try the "Performance" mode in FSR. Some other options to consider lowering is your graphic settings and the Post-Processing Antialiasing. I would suggest use the 2nd preset without the EXTRAFX and turn off unnecessary CSP FX too. But try the 2nd preset without lowering anything first. Let me know how it goes.
My menu does not come close to what u have? Do I have an older version??
CM version 0.8.2663.39678
@@digitalvei oke does not mean a lot to me like that 😀
@@vanderdetails.detailing. The CM always up to date, I forgot which version when I made the video.
@@digitalvei whats CM stand for?
@@vanderdetails.detailing. Content Manager, it's a custom launcher, not the default Kunos launcher. It improves various aspects of the game. I think you're still using the default launcher.
Bro you should have hundreds of thousands of subs.
Barely started this old channel again, on its way to 500 first I guess..
How about Shutoko Highway C2 with traffic?
Never play the map my self, but according someone in the comment here, one of my 3 presets is improving the performance. Try the preset without the Extra FX.
@@digitalvei I really liked your preset. Adding 65% of blur and enabling Extra Fx with lowering the reflection intensity can be my next favourite settings. Thanks.
@@windowedthoughts that's great, have fun playing!
how come the little images in csp break down when changing settings?
which images?
@@digitalvei the small ones on top of like graphic adjustments or extra fx, they seem to crash
@@dennyvdb8185 i'm not sure why, it's not always visible here, and i just leave it like that since it doesn't bother me too much.
@digitalvei it bothered me haha, I go inside documents/assetto corsa/ cfg/extention I think it is. Then I remove those ini's start cm up again and save my previous load settings. The one you gave here are the best BTW!!! After removing and restart they are fine and settings are oké
@@dennyvdb8185 I'll give it a try, thanks for helping the fix.
i play on 34" screen , 1920x1080 is not enough , it's probably why it's pretty high fps for you
Tried it before on the same 34" LG monitor with 2160x1440 on the video settings, doesn't make any performance difference on this same presets. I'm reminding myself that 60 to 80 is my threshold with 75 FPS limiter. Higher than 100 FPS without the limiter means that the graphic quality can still be improved via the settings to get the stable threshold.
I'm gonna try , why not 😀, i essentially use upscaled low resolution but it's pretty ugly , you vid gonna help many ppl for sure
@@RCGangstaZ Give it a try on reducing the post processing effect one step by keeping the FSR setting in quality for example, to improve the framerate. Or, disabling the GrassFX. My rig can only handle "Performance" in FSR if I'm doing the 20 AI races, but I let the other CSP & graphics options unchanged, getting 50-60 FPS with barely noticeable dropped graphic quality is good enough for this kind of races.
TAA 😂 = classic 👌
You are a fucking genius.
I ve been trying to find good settings with my AMD beast 6950 for two years but nothing!!!
A big thanks.🙏
Any chance to get your PURE link please?
Thanks. The PPF is a very old GAF Arrow Filter, I modify it by combining with bunch of .LUA scripts from other PPF which I completely forgot what's the original script taken from. I don't think it's proper to share if there's other people's work in it, not my own. But here's the original PPF link: www.overtake.gg/downloads/gaf-arrow_filter-ppfilter-for-assetto-corsa.36989/
@@digitalvei i was hoping to reach the same greatest FPS in VR but i understand is challenging even for a medium high specs like my PC.
I use FSR in the graphics card here but with your settings it struggles a lot even without ExtraFX so i use my "normal" settings.
Any suggestions for VR?
Also is it better using capped FPS or not?
Cheers again buddy
@@MarvinButterfly Haven't tried this in VR, but try turning off the DXGI, also try with the "fullscreen" enabled or disabled in graphics settings and see the difference, also turn off NeckFX, since I don't think it's any use in VR.
@@digitalvei Neck FX is important for me unfortunately, without of it it's so boring.
I ll try thanks again
@@MarvinButterfly Have you tried turning on "Mode Tweaks VR?", it's turned off in my presets.
Turn off Grass, barely noticable and eats your fps
Yup, already there in the video description.
cry in gtx 1050 2gb vram with 8gb ddr3
Have you tried the sad settings? :)
@@digitalvei man i really want to balance the visual and performance but thats too much 😭😭😭😭 (yes i tried).
either way, do you know what cause sudden gpu and cpu usage spike when throttle input?
@@Hygix_ First, use the Render Stat app in your game and look for what's eating your resource the most. from there, you can use the info on which setting to reduce or disabled. If you're using Pure, use the Pure low-res. Not sure about the throttle input, but you might wanna try set the FXAA in Post-Processing to medium and the FSR to Performance together with the video settings in around medium.
YEAH...... now go into a full no hesi server at the Nürburgring and kiss those high fps numbers goodbye
What a great way to announce your personality and unhappiness to people. Well done. Your feedback is very valuable to the AC community. Have a little bit of fun, man.
Thanks for replying 👍
So a mid range $2000+ PC still has lower fidelity, horrible load times, far less car models and of lower quality than a $400 PS5 with Gran Turismo 7? And from the time of being unplugged, to plugged in and racing online against others is about 2 minutes in GT7, versus a couple hours of constantly fiddling and tuning and then dealing with endless driver updates?! GT7 has basically ZERO load times, iRacing it takes so many minutes, absolutely 20+ year old issues left to fester. I think the Stockholm syndrome needs some serious antidote. Folks should be demanding more, but instead are throwing money away and defending their enslavement. male egos be trivial to manipulate, eh? When Gran Turismo offers a Pro Mode with monthly subscription for $10 a month or so for full detailed racing stats tracking and online marshaling and stewarding, folks can experience and enjoy so much more for so much less expense and frustration. You can get a full top of the line Fanatec Direct Drive+ Extreme Wheel, PS5, and GT7 ( and/or AC:C ) and save lots of money up front and so many more hours by having everything work flawlessly out of the box. Things aren't adding up, and it's time to hold folks to account and not settle or worse wastefully support it.
Bro, I want the same stuff you've smoked.
@@digitalvei It's all fact. How about some non toxic reality. 120hz 1440p looks and performs with better fidelity, accuracy and realism, and oh those deep puddle mirror like reflections , especially with 250hz force feedback - OUT OF THE BOX. Results from true passion just far exceed the rest. Hyper optimized quality is unmatched. AC is ok, maybe decent if you have dozens or hundreds of hours to tinker/mod more than race, some of us prefer to race people. In person 2160p or 1440p @120hz is far greater than the compressed ytube 1440p@60, but still vastly exceptional. ruclips.net/video/mZCptbhXE78/видео.html It's great to see the effort, but being aware of the fidelity and performance of the racing sims in the space is very important. The Olympics eSport racing with Gran Turismo 7 and the Mercedes virtual racing competition with iRacing, GT7 and ACC along with the Nations Cup broadcasts really show the spectacular quality and fidelity. And for the cost, it's like the ultimate deal. At the least it's a benchmark to be very aware of.
@@xDriver69x Sure thing, but my PC cost less than $500 to build, not $2000. Appreciate the tips and the laughs from the GT7 vs. AC comparison! I still hop on GT7 now and then when I'm in the mood for a more laid-back simcade experience with its limited car selection. Both games are fun in their own way and cater to different kinds of players. I’m guessing you're not up to speed with how much AC has evolved over the last decade, especially thanks to its modding community. Two people (not the developers) basically revamped the game’s visuals, realism, and alot of other aspects of the game making it a whole new experience for players worldwide. Comparing a 2014 game to a 2022 one is a bit off, but good insights, bro.
Cope more, and play with you childish toy that only retarded children find fun.
If you lack the brain cells to set up assetto corsa you are retarded.
Console scum
@@digitalvei he neglected to mention on top of that $120 a year he also has to pay for ps+ so thats another $80, beings gt7 released in 2022 thats $400 in subscriptions and $400 for the console, not exactly a well rounded argument, gotta love console gamers for their ignorance.
The AI voice is really weird and off-putting.
Yeah
Your comment is weird and off putting, your existence is off putting.