They probably wanted to show that witcher is different than wizard or something, and wanted to show more about his swordplay, is kinda stupid because why you make a show about witcher but dont show the full potential of witcher
@@gunawanputera6443a witcher uses his skills in a sword and skills in magic. They are heavily reliable and useful for a specific monster. Can’t believe the show never really used them much
I hope he uses igni more often in the next season. He only used it once on the basilisk. Yes he used it twice on his sword but I'd love to see him use it more directly to enemies. I love when he gets creative though like when he used aard to bounce the guy up and onto his sword XD I also hope they'll implement the alternative signs like firestream, aard sweep, magic trap and puppet in some way. Although I dunno if those are cannon with the books...
Non of what you said resembles anything in the books, so what you're suggesting is for them to butcher the source material even further for the sake of showcasing things that are not even feasible outside of a video game, because they ruin immersion, among MANY other reasons. Geralt isn't superman, bro. You're at the wrong franchise.
@@ollie395 No, I definitely am a fan of the games. I just think its stupid implementing concepts that work ONLY in video games into other mediums. It ruins the plot and immersion of the show, and does nothing but appeasing people who are dangerously clueless about what this show needs. Again, geralt isn't a mage, he's a witcher. Things like advanced signs exist to make the gameplay more engaging, but from a plot perspective having your main character be able to burn a dozen people in an instant just changes everything drastically, and definitely for the worse in this situation. How do you expect the show to be believable when geralt can just wriggle out of any situation like in the games, thanks to those Op mechanics??
@@jonathan13co I did say I didn't know if it was canon with the books. But to tell me I'm at the wrong franchise is a bit aggressive dude. You'll NEVER be able to make a series the same as the books. It just doesn't work that way. But you gotta remember, the Witcher has existed for a VERY long time. It became popular BECAUSE of the games. And Henry Cavill himself said he took inspiration from both sources. Like the voice he uses...it's from the games. I can see how it could make him too powerful, sure. But there's so many ways you can make it happen without using it too often AND giving a reason for why he can't use it all the time. But that's just my opinion. I'm not gonna push that on you... but neither should you push yours on me.
I love how the visuals of each signs were made, but it could be better if the sign symbol projects each time he casts a sign. Especially the coolest sign which is IGNI
This is just so sad to watch, what could have been man...They had Henry, they had the budget seemingly, and they threw it all away to make their own pile of junk, forcing the main actor to literally QUIT the entire operation out of respect for Witcher lore, I WISH this series was a masterful adaptation like LOTR, but no, they gave us a complete abomination, no wonder the series is destined for failure and likely cancelation after season 4 inevitably bombs with counterfeit Henry Cavil AKA Liam Hemsworth (no offence to Liam I'm sure he's a stand up guy) but Henry was born to play Geralt.
@@Uallysdrgnvevodoesn't a quen forms a sphere? Heliotrope only protects from front just like In 0:43 and even in books, it is said Geralt used Heliotrope against The Bruxa's Scream
@@kashaanalisiddqui3780 In it's basic form, Quen only forms a shield infront of the user. But can be expanded to surround them. Heliotrop is a split second type of shield, but only against a single strike
@@TheMETALICA40 That doesn't look anything like a Basilisk, but ok. Slyzards do have have acid glands but they use fire instead. Every draconid does, from wyverns to Cockrtrice.
He's mostly only using aard and quen, igni to heat up his sword wich is a dumb use of the sign it would take too long to heat up the metal, and axxi one time in the beginning. And one time yrden apparently. What really bother's me about the signs is that they don't have a personality of their own, aard is just an invisible force, quen is just an invisible shield idk kinda lame, yrden also looks like an invisible barrier. I was not impressed with the way the signs where presented in this show, shure i know this are supossed to be subtle magical effects but it could have looked cooler in my opinion something the games did a lot better.
in the books its actually never used as a long range fire attack. he specifically uses it to heat objects or to mend his sword when it is chipped as a blacksmith would by heating the metal. edit: he also uses it a few times to light small fires and such, not as a weapon.
@@marktchaipunt5473 this series doesn't follow all the things in the book and it's not just that effects looks very bad compared to other effects that's what I'm saying everything they made cgi, fuild effects all are good and this shot looks lame
It must be really tough for actors to give their all on set and just do their jobs only for them to watch it back and realise that the editing, choreography, camerawork, pacing and sound design are all terrible.
It's kinda stupid. If Geralt just spam sign he easily win everything but he doesn't and chose to use sword. In the game it's different, but in the show it's just straight up OP. Just spam signs
If the mages can't continously spam spells, why do you think the witchers, who use a much worse version of a spell with a worse affinity to chaos be able to spam them?
@@mobiusmobius738 He should use them at the start buddy. Then the cool down can starts sooner. This how you use signs in the game. You don't go in with swords and then use sign at the very end. But you're a loser that can't use logic so guess you know nothing about that.
Mainly aard and quen. Used axii once on his own horse No yrden And 1 lousy wet fart of igni at the end. Love the games and appreciate their effort with the Netflix series but I said it before n stand by it. Cheesy lame show not worth while.
Tis' your own opinion. I enjoyed the show, despite the numerous people bashing the show for it's inaccuracies, which is actually annoying. also at 4:02 is where people said that "Yrden" was used.
Geralt has never canonically used signs like we do in the witcher games. Sorry, but it's the truth. They are rare, and are meant to be rare. He is not a sorcerer.
They do use yrden, to contain ciri, and it does exactly what it says it does in the books. It contains (or blocks the access of) magical creatures and turns the incorporeal in corporeal. The signs both in the show and in the books can barely do anything, they're useful in the hand of a skillful witcher but they can't burn a monster to a crisp. Witchers are dogshit at magic, thats literally how they got their moniker, because they're only capable of doing simple witchery. Maybe don't comment if you know nothing about the source material.
Both signs have their uses and wich one is better deppends on the situation. Aard can knock over enemies and OTK them while prone on the ground, let flying shit fall on the ground, push things of a cliff. Igni applies burning or can explode barrels or gases of a dragon's dream bomb. Aard is actually stronger now that i think about it, you can have an AoE variant and eventually you can freeze enemies with it, it has more uses.
I like how In the games and books Geralt uses the signs for different tasks but in the show it’s basically just AARD
And quen sometimes igni
They probably wanted to show that witcher is different than wizard or something, and wanted to show more about his swordplay, is kinda stupid because why you make a show about witcher but dont show the full potential of witcher
@@gunawanputera6443a witcher uses his skills in a sword and skills in magic. They are heavily reliable and useful for a specific monster. Can’t believe the show never really used them much
@@SexLuthor i know right? How cool if they show full potential of witcher sign, even for quen im kinda dissapointed its look like ard in show
Yrden also was never shown
RIP Roach. He was always, ALWAYS, there
Another Roach always comes
Literally every horse Geralt has owned was named roach, so he would not get too attached to it.
Roach is always a she
So that's why it's called 'cockroach' there are more
@@skibididapadada u can literally hear roach talking in tw3, does not mean, it always she or he but mostly roach is he.
I hope he uses igni more often in the next season. He only used it once on the basilisk. Yes he used it twice on his sword but I'd love to see him use it more directly to enemies. I love when he gets creative though like when he used aard to bounce the guy up and onto his sword XD I also hope they'll implement the alternative signs like firestream, aard sweep, magic trap and puppet in some way. Although I dunno if those are cannon with the books...
but it's canon with the games :D
Non of what you said resembles anything in the books, so what you're suggesting is for them to butcher the source material even further for the sake of showcasing things that are not even feasible outside of a video game, because they ruin immersion, among MANY other reasons. Geralt isn't superman, bro. You're at the wrong franchise.
@@jonathan13co Seems you don't like the series or the games... seems you shouldn't be here then
@@ollie395 No, I definitely am a fan of the games. I just think its stupid implementing concepts that work ONLY in video games into other mediums. It ruins the plot and immersion of the show, and does nothing but appeasing people who are dangerously clueless about what this show needs. Again, geralt isn't a mage, he's a witcher. Things like advanced signs exist to make the gameplay more engaging, but from a plot perspective having your main character be able to burn a dozen people in an instant just changes everything drastically, and definitely for the worse in this situation.
How do you expect the show to be believable when geralt can just wriggle out of any situation like in the games, thanks to those Op mechanics??
@@jonathan13co I did say I didn't know if it was canon with the books. But to tell me I'm at the wrong franchise is a bit aggressive dude. You'll NEVER be able to make a series the same as the books. It just doesn't work that way. But you gotta remember, the Witcher has existed for a VERY long time. It became popular BECAUSE of the games. And Henry Cavill himself said he took inspiration from both sources. Like the voice he uses...it's from the games. I can see how it could make him too powerful, sure. But there's so many ways you can make it happen without using it too often AND giving a reason for why he can't use it all the time. But that's just my opinion. I'm not gonna push that on you... but neither should you push yours on me.
1:30 the way Ciri runs XD
3:52 & 4:18 Geralt crosses his wrist to cast Heliotrope the way it's described in The Last Wish
3:52 is Yrden. Geralt even says the name of the Sign.
@@drogadepc if you slow down the video you'll see him using it
I didn't read the original witcher so i am wondering what is difference between Quen and Heilotrope 🤔
@@lec3148 one is for physical and one is for magical stuff i Think
@@drogadepc Nope, it is Heliotrope.. He told to Vessemir "yrden, now!" which they put on Ciri literally few seconds after.
2:48 me beating up the lvl 7 bandits in Velen bare handed
I always loved single-handedly destroying the criminal underworld of novigrad and then just waiting for them to respawn
@@jeremiahjenoWhoreson juniors henchman😂
I would love to see him loot things in the show. Just walk around and take stuff that isn't his just as a comedic thing.
have him be a loot addict loooooool
It's too bad Cavill was the only one who cared about the series.
I can only imagine how he felt
I love how the visuals of each signs were made, but it could be better if the sign symbol projects each time he casts a sign. Especially the coolest sign which is IGNI
Will you watch the upcoming woke season?
Na bro QUEN Gaming
I personaly disagree with the visuals of the signs, they suck
Man the action this season was so good
This show receives a lot of (justified) hate but some of the fighting scenes with Cavill were so damn satisfying
I didn't like the sped up fight in season two so much. Felt off. I understand slow motion shots for geralts awareness being shown but idk felt weird
Geralt being able to make his blade red-hot should totally have been an acquirable skill in the game…
I hope that his armor is a little more faithful in the next season
Yrden!!! Trap it with Yrden!!!
Lmao
I love this referents
Yeah , sile 😂
in season 3 yrden witchcraft trap should be showned, igni = firesteam , axii = puppet mode , aard= blast mode etc ...
I was going to say "this is based on the books, not the games" but that would also be a lie hahaha
@@123Juniiorr this show is based on nothing other than being in the world of the Witcher
I think Netflix Geralt goes full AARD build
If only he picked up the piercing cold mutation
Looks like he uses a i in asl for Axii. Its the same in the game.
Aard is hurry. Quen is s
How do you waste Henry Cavil as Geralt...
There was a one more sing in leshy fight geralt was using aard (or quen maybe) to locking the door .
That's Yrden
That's yrden, I think one of the only times he uses it in the books...
This is just so sad to watch, what could have been man...They had Henry, they had the budget seemingly, and they threw it all away to make their own pile of junk, forcing the main actor to literally QUIT the entire operation out of respect for Witcher lore, I WISH this series was a masterful adaptation like LOTR, but no, they gave us a complete abomination, no wonder the series is destined for failure and likely cancelation after season 4 inevitably bombs with counterfeit Henry Cavil AKA Liam Hemsworth (no offence to Liam I'm sure he's a stand up guy) but Henry was born to play Geralt.
0:43
was that the heliotrop or the quen?
Quen, heliotrope is cast by crossing the wrists. he actually seems to cast it ay 4:18
@@Uallysdrgnvevodoesn't a quen forms a sphere?
Heliotrope only protects from front just like In 0:43
and even in books, it is said Geralt used Heliotrope against The Bruxa's Scream
@@kashaanalisiddqui3780 In it's basic form, Quen only forms a shield infront of the user. But can be expanded to surround them. Heliotrop is a split second type of shield, but only against a single strike
Nice vid bro
Was that a Slyzard at the end?looks very much like it
Basilisk
@@TheMETALICA40 Nah, that's a Slyzard. They are white in color and have protruding mouth. Basilisks have rooster's head and draconid body.
@@SorcererKing94 Slyzards dont have eyes and they spit fire and they dont have acid Glands.Thats a Basilisk.
@@TheMETALICA40 That doesn't look anything like a Basilisk, but ok. Slyzards do have have acid glands but they use fire instead. Every draconid does, from wyverns to Cockrtrice.
@@SorcererKing94 Im a witcher bro it is a Basilisk
I’m happy they used them I don’t think any were used in the first season
He used one at the start of the fight in blaviken
He did use them in Season One
He only used Aard in Season one. In season 2 he uses Aard, Igni, Yrden, Quen and Axii
You are a clown, dude
@@epiczeus945 when did he use yrden? I think that's the only one left
Little bro thinks he is the dragon born 💀
The witcher signs in season 2. but henry cavill didnt sign in season 4
He's mostly only using aard and quen, igni to heat up his sword wich is a dumb use of the sign it would take too long to heat up the metal, and axxi one time in the beginning. And one time yrden apparently. What really bother's me about the signs is that they don't have a personality of their own, aard is just an invisible force, quen is just an invisible shield idk kinda lame, yrden also looks like an invisible barrier.
I was not impressed with the way the signs where presented in this show, shure i know this are supossed to be subtle magical effects but it could have looked cooler in my opinion something the games did a lot better.
The only thing use of the igni is to heat the sword is just a waste I mean it meant to be a somewhat long range sign not this
in the books its actually never used as a long range fire attack. he specifically uses it to heat objects or to mend his sword when it is chipped as a blacksmith would by heating the metal.
edit: he also uses it a few times to light small fires and such, not as a weapon.
0:45 aard or quen?
He used quen to block than aard to push
Both
John wick will be jealous
Where's Yrden?
where is Yrden?
DUDE leshens arent cursed why on earth they made in show eskel to be cursed and turned into a leshen thats not how a leshen borns lol
What about Yrden?
they use it on Ciri at 3:53
yeah visually its kinda same as quen
I was expecting purple gylphs in a circle ⭕️
Agni effect is not impact full as in games
If I remember from the series, Vesemir says that Igni is forbidden and so is Fire Sorcery to Mages. Maybe he'll use it more in the upcoming seasons.
@@Mannistheorion even though it's forbidden he used it & in the series that vfx shot looks like youtube fire effect AE tutorial
Igni by the books is just Geralt superheating his hand, which he uses to burn through rope and solder a hole in a pot
@@marktchaipunt5473 this series doesn't follow all the things in the book and it's not just that effects looks very bad compared to other effects that's what I'm saying everything they made cgi, fuild effects all are good and this shot looks lame
@@kamesheshwar4900 hell, the series doesn't follow the books at all, I'm just responding to your comment that igni looks weak.
This show could be better even than Game Of Thrones.
A Shame show runner don't give a shit the books.
It must be really tough for actors to give their all on set and just do their jobs only for them to watch it back and realise that the editing, choreography, camerawork, pacing and sound design are all terrible.
It's kinda stupid. If Geralt just spam sign he easily win everything but he doesn't and chose to use sword. In the game it's different, but in the show it's just straight up OP. Just spam signs
they are on cooldown
It’s the exact same as in the games
If the mages can't continously spam spells, why do you think the witchers, who use a much worse version of a spell with a worse affinity to chaos be able to spam them?
@@mobiusmobius738 He should use them at the start buddy. Then the cool down can starts sooner. This how you use signs in the game. You don't go in with swords and then use sign at the very end. But you're a loser that can't use logic so guess you know nothing about that.
@@anonanon9880 how boring would it be to see him just spam signs
Too much Aard
Mainly aard and quen.
Used axii once on his own horse
No yrden
And 1 lousy wet fart of igni at the end.
Love the games and appreciate their effort with the Netflix series but I said it before n stand by it. Cheesy lame show not worth while.
Tis' your own opinion. I enjoyed the show, despite the numerous people bashing the show for it's inaccuracies, which is actually annoying.
also at 4:02 is where people said that "Yrden" was used.
Geralt has never canonically used signs like we do in the witcher games. Sorry, but it's the truth. They are rare, and are meant to be rare. He is not a sorcerer.
@@isaiahdaniels5643 He does uses them rarely in the games, what's your point?
They do use yrden, to contain ciri, and it does exactly what it says it does in the books. It contains (or blocks the access of) magical creatures and turns the incorporeal in corporeal. The signs both in the show and in the books can barely do anything, they're useful in the hand of a skillful witcher but they can't burn a monster to a crisp. Witchers are dogshit at magic, thats literally how they got their moniker, because they're only capable of doing simple witchery. Maybe don't comment if you know nothing about the source material.
He definitely likes Aard. I like to toast every of my enemy. Igni is the real shit.
I used that too unless i learned about Aards cutting cold abilitly from Blood and wine
Aard with piercing cold mutation is the real shit.
Both signs have their uses and wich one is better deppends on the situation. Aard can knock over enemies and OTK them while prone on the ground, let flying shit fall on the ground, push things of a cliff. Igni applies burning or can explode barrels or gases of a dragon's dream bomb.
Aard is actually stronger now that i think about it, you can have an AoE variant and eventually you can freeze enemies with it, it has more uses.