Based on all your videos it is clear that Volkswagen Haldex system is an incredible AWD,the software works perfectly in most situations, the Audi Haldex is configured for performance and spirited driving not traction/snow/off road. Thank you for these videos you have spread a lot of information on the topic of AWD.
Kiedyś miałem golfa 4 1.9 4motion z edc. Niesamowicie dobrze ten samochód radził sobie w śniegu. Ograniczał go tylko prześwit... :) Później jeździłem foresterem i moim zdaniem do codziennej jazdy haldex jest lepszy - stabilniejszy na śniegu, a i dynamiczne ruszenie na mokrym w Golfie też lepiej wychodziło. Golfem mogłem ruszyć na śniegu z pełnym butem bez strachu, że tył zacznie wyprzedzać przód. Subaru było bardziej niestabilne, ale dzięki temu na pustych drogach dawało więcej frajdy :D Oba samochody miały nowe opony i poodbną moc.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers no pewnie było by inaczej :) ale wiele osób wychwala napęd subaru pod niebiosa i twierdzi, że takie auto trzyma się perfekcyjnie i wyjedzie z każdej zaspy, a tymczasem nie do końca tak było. Co nie zmienia faktu, że forester to ekstra samochód i dał mi kupę frajdy z jazdy. :) Golf z haldexem oprócz dobrego napędu miał jeszcze jedną zaletę; nikt się po tym aucie nie spodziewał, że ma 4x4. :D Miałem to szczęscie, że użytkowałem go przez dwie śnieżne zimy i nie raz z radością obserwowałem zdziwione miny innych kierowców :D
@@macv6 A co powiesz na temat zaskakiwania kierowcy przez pierwsze generacje haldexa, bzdura czy potwierdzasz? Chodzi mi o nagłe lub zbyt gwałtowne załączanie.
Ciekawym rozwiązaniem było by zrobienie listy samochodów z podsumowaniem, które i na ile sobie poradziły i w jakim czasie. Mogła by być prezentowana na końcu tak jak to robi Doug DeMuro.
Nice video. The different design of the ESP + EDL is interesting, especially on the rear axle. It would also be interesting if something happened if the front wheels had 50% steering angle on the rolls.
Are you sure the Golf videos of 'one wheel on the ground in the back' with and without ESP are swapped? Every other haldex car only drove down without ESP and the Golf only with it on?
Hi! great videos you have! Maybe you can do this also for 2WD cars to check how electronics helps open differential in hard conditions on regular cars?
Thanks! There are some 2wd cars - mainly the ones with driving modes like Renault Captur XMOD, Peugeot 3008 & 5008 with Advanced Grip Control. Or sporty ones like Suzuki Swift Sport.
@@hansvanderveen3323 If you mean the systems that use brakes then find on my channel the cars that I mentioned in previous comment. Test on one roller, no problems for 2wd cars.
I have Škoda Octavia 4x4 A5 (2005, diesel engine 1.9 TDI 77 kw), so if I am not wrong it uses 2. generation od Haldex system. So, it doesn't have that e-brake system that is braking the wheel without traction for transfering the power to another wheel. If I found myself in tricky situation, would it be helpfull to apply quick braking (pressing the brakes quickly several times or it is useless)? I saw this comment under one video of skoda scout pulling out stuck car from the snow: " Use some brake my friend to help the diffs!!!" CAN YOU EXPLAIN IT PLS ? :/
i have ESP and ABS offcourse, you missunderstood me when I was mentioning e-brake system that is controling power transfer, I was refering to 5. generation of haldex which have EDL (electronic differential lock) that is applying brakes to the wheels that are sliping and it is shitfing power to those wheels with traction. So in older generation, 1. 2. and 4. - th i think, when one wheel slips it diverts all the power in that way beacuse the power follows the path of least resistance on open differentials. Correct me If I am wrong :/
@@Ahelot If you have ESP/ABS then you have TC/EDL, that is the same module, so the system is braking the spinning wheel. The question is if that is effective enough.
yes, that is the right question.... and what is about comment that someone wrote: " Use some brake my friend to help the diffs!!!" ?? sry for bothering you :D
@@Ahelot No problem :) Light usage of brakes should help, this way driver may try to do what electronics should do. However it doesn't work in many cars cause there is brake pedal priority so power may be cut.
Would coilovers somehow effect performance? Something with the springrates and weight aplied to the wheels, or perhaps making it harder to compress the springs on the wheels wich have to 'bump' over the rollers? With stiff spings, the weight of the car has to be lifted over the extra hight instead of the spings just having to compress a bit to lift just the wheels instead of the whole car? Correct me if I'm wrong, but be a jerk about it, it's the internet after all
That's a good point, that may slightly affect the results but that's visible in the test. If suspension is too stiff then wheels are starting to spin on pavement, like here: ruclips.net/video/p5J3gvdZwqs/видео.html
Gdzieś na jakimś filmiku po niemiecku o układach EDS w grupie VAG była informacja że wyłączenie ASR/ESP nie powoduje wyłączenia EDS. EDS ma wtedy po prostu więcej roboty bo ASR nie ogranicza momentu obrotowego na silniku
@@wessideindeblack chodzi mi o to ,że przyjeło się w ogólnym rozumieniu quattro jako napęd stały otwarty lub z torsenem, a haldex pozostaje haldexem nawet po zmianie softu zasada działania się nie zmienia. W teście zostały porównane dwa identyczne układy jak by dołożyć np jakieś a4 quattro wtedy rzeczywiście można by nazwać film quattro vs haldex a tak to raczej porównane softu albo sprawnośći układu jedynie, nie mówię już o tych nowszych wagach bo tam wszędzie jest rozłączany ze względu na ekonomię. O to mi chodziło dokładnie;)
To, że jakiekolwiek dwa samochody mają haldexa nie oznacza, że te układy będą działać tak samo, co widać w teście. Poza tym oprócz haldexa dochodzi tu jeszcze EDL.
Dumb question of the day: How do these AWD systems (not just for these two cars) perform in reverse? I am just asking because sometimes people have to reverse their car out of an angle park on the snow or ice up a slight uphill slope towards the crown of the road.
That's not a dumb question: ruclips.net/video/NVkyZJlox4Y/видео.html However some viewers say that is some older cars traction control doesn't work on reverse.
Quattro ja 4motion are brands that utilize different 4wd systems, most common are Haldex and Torsen. Both of these cars are based on Haldex system, so the title of the video can be misleading to many watchers.
The fact that both are based on haldex doesn't mean that they work the same. Besides there is 4Motion badge on Golf and Quattro badge on S3, so saying that title can be misleading is like saying that those badges are misleading.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers i dont remember the exact source, it was an information that stuck with me since the haldex unit is an edl one. I do currently own a v6 4mo and in the snow it does seem more rear happy.
I don't think, you should've used different engines... The 1.9 TDI has far more torque earlier in the revs and the audi needed more revs for the same torque, more revs means more slipping and therefore the torsen was doomed already... If you compare, don't forget the different torque thats given by the different engines at different revs and therefore different revolutions of the wheels... This is important.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers no false, A4 B6 1.9 TDI Quattro has 310 NM, S3 8L with 1.8T Quattro Haldex has max. 280 NM and around 300rpm later... And no, all you are measuring in the test with one wheel on the ground is, if enough torque reaches the one wheel to get the vehicle going. More torque, the better
@@that_escalated_quickly2720 You clearly don't understand that torque generated by the engine relies on resistance/grip. Low grip = low torque generated. The ability of the engine may be 1000 Nm but it won't generate it if grip doesn't allow it. Edit - I forgot to mention - max torque of 1.9 TDI is from 240 Nm to 320 Nm, depends on version.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers dude stop deleting my comments just say you don't care, I don't use bad language so it is not youtube deleting them ;) it is obvious, that engines give torque by load applied, but why don't you just try using a A4 B6 1.9 TDI Quattro against S3 8L? Do you need an A4 B6 1.9 TDI Quattro?
@@that_escalated_quickly2720 I didn't delete any of your comments. I can't see any in spam tab to. If there will be any volunteer with A4 B6 1.9 TDI - we will test it.
...and there you see the only problem of Gen. 1, EDS only on the front so if on the rear one wheel spins the car is standing still as seen at the end...
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers ...By EDS I mean Elektronische Differenzial Sperre don't know the English word, and sorry I don't think the car has it on the rear wheels so the car moves only because of the 3 wheels on the rolls make enough dinamic force to jump a little of the rolls, but the one rear wheel on the ground doesn't get any Power at 3.18 it takes much to long time, with EDS it would instantly move...
@@petarjelinic7682 EDS in English is EDL. Both cars have it on rear axles, they even slip the rear wheel on pavement. It is not possible to pass this test without EDL. Other indication is the back of the car - you can see it going down like handbrake was used. It takes more time cause power must go through haldex first. That is standard behaviour for this type of awd systems (I mean more time needed to pass the test - if pass at all).
Why dont you sell it and buy the awd one with some difference, i bought a 1.9 tdi 2003 jetta wagon 101hp FWD for 1900€ a year ago and i saw for sale recently a 1.9 tdi 130hp AWD wagon jetta for 2400€
Most of 2022 SUVs perform the same. Seems that 4x4 systems didn't evolve a lot in the last 20 years. And hybrids are worse. Check RAV4 or Outlander. They fail to pass even with 2 wheels on the asphalt.
Both car using Haldex system, so Audi A3, Audi TT and think so Audi Q3 using Haldex system, they are not a true Quattro, because the engines are mounted longitudinally and because that it's a normal 4motitos or synchro system. We have also an example at VW Passat B5.5 which engine is mounted longwise and this is pure blood Quattro vehicle with Torsen drive.
There's about 15 types of Quattro, Haldex is one of them. People may say it is not true etc, but that's still under Quattro name. Like 15 other systems, not only torsen.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers We are reading about comparation of this two cars. They using apslotitly the same system of drive called Haldex. And this system is mostly implemented to the VW vehicle, and the true reason why only Audi 3, TT using Haldex is longitudinally mounted engine, and all other Audi model using Torsen system. And the difference between this two are very different. Sorry about my bad Eng
@@izetamajka3309 Firstly - the fact that both cars use haldex doesn't mean that they work the same. Secondly - not all other Audis use torsen, there is much more types of Quattro.
The fact that both systems are based on haldex doesn't mean that they work the same, if you watch with attention you will see the differences independent from drivers. Tires do not influence this test.
So many car guys go: HALDEX 1 IS JUST FWD WITH LAG'!!!11111 REEEE3. I wonder if this is going to make them faint. Because HALDEX 1 just beat a bunch of SUVs, mercs and beemers. Funny how things play out.
Well, there is a small lag, haldex 1 & 2 are reactive. Gen 3 was first one with some proactive control. The biggest problem of first generation wasn't the lag, but the handling - unexpected change from undeersteer to oversteer. Software issue, not the haldex itself.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers Yes all audi 4wd is called quattro, but audi A3 quattro (haldex system) has nothing to do with eg. audi A4 quattro (torsen system). The Audi A3 and the Golf 4 system are the same haldex (so there is no point in comparing them), only the manufacturers have the names of 4wd for their models. For me, a quattro is only associated with a real quattro, i.e. audi b2 quattro with all interlocking.😉
@@vytautasmykolaitis Sure, but 4Motion system from Golf IV has nothing to do with 4Motion from Passat B5, right? So what is 4Motion then in relation to your first comment? The fact that both are using haldex doesn't mean they work the same, especially that it is S3 here. B2 didn't have all interlocking, front was open.
4x4 tests on rollers - duszaniespokojna channel you are tooooo stupid man its the same shit the same haldex clutch i work at audi the s3 habe a different transmission but theres the same haldex like in the golf mk4 ... 😂😂😂 LOL
@@djemalbajrami49 Talking about being stupid - you obviously don't understand what you read. Where did I say it is not the same haldex? Quote me. Furthermore - if you were working in Audi you would know what is the difference between haldex setup in A3 and S3. And between haldex in standard Golf IV and R32. But you don't. Later...
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers The difference is in the wear of the drive. Each haldex car behaves differently. Do the Audi a4b5 + golf 4 test, it will be real
@@marcin6694 Both cars have haldex in very shape. The difference is in many factors, like haldex setup, EDL module version, software version etc. Here is Golf IV vs A4 B7: ruclips.net/video/bHTHP2WuciE/видео.html
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers Ok, but the haldex + torsen test would be something real, something that can be compared here. Comparison of the same car in terms of 4x4 drive, not 2 + 2
W wersji 2.8vr6 i s3 1.8t jest inne oprogramowanie sterownika co powoduje szybsza reakcje napędu. To jest jedyna różnica. Mocne wersję golfa i s3 lepiej działają od analogicznych z tdi
@@pudekoksiazka2256 Gdyby był Golf R32, to wtedy (prawdopodobnie) byłyby takie same napędy, choć nigdy nie wiadomo, z jaką wersją softu, tym bardziej, że były aktualizacje.
The same haldex-based system in both cars, right?
Yes, haldex 1.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers what about same audi but s3 version?
As always gr8 content, thank You
@@c4n15lupu5 This is S3 version.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers now, everything is clear. I'd love to see comparison between passat b5 vs b6 😉
@@c4n15lupu5 All up to volunteers :)
These two old cars did very great , some new cars with 4wd can't do it !
Yes, it is true
I did not expect them to be this good. Especially that golf did really well and completed every test besides last one with relative ease.
They have exactly the same drivetrain.
Look at that beautifully maintained MK4 Golf! ❤ Sorry, there's just something about those, that look like they're new, that always get me.
Gotta love MK4's!!
PD 150 mk4 owner here 😍
@@dmc12345678910 and 2.8 4motion mk4 owner here :)
Beautifull golf its oxymoron
@@kubson012 no, no we are normal morons, not the oxy version... 😆
Based on all your videos it is clear that Volkswagen Haldex system is an incredible AWD,the software works perfectly in most situations, the Audi Haldex is configured for performance and spirited driving not traction/snow/off road. Thank you for these videos you have spread a lot of information on the topic of AWD.
Haldex works great also in some other cars - for example Volvo.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers yeah,I hope you can test XC40 and maybe an Evoque.
Спасибо за очередное сравнение.
И владельцам авто тоже наша благодарность👍
Сравнение одной и той же системы на разных будках
Ну и результат же одинаковый
@@igostets9213 хотя у Ауди жопа раньше схватывает так мозг запрограммирован,и много кто ищет ЭБУ от s3
that vw golf still have a nice engine sound.
really love that 1.9tdi best ever.
Congrats for the NEW channel NAME. Finally i found you again. Top job the one you are doing!!.
Thank you!
Kiedyś miałem golfa 4 1.9 4motion z edc. Niesamowicie dobrze ten samochód radził sobie w śniegu. Ograniczał go tylko prześwit... :)
Później jeździłem foresterem i moim zdaniem do codziennej jazdy haldex jest lepszy - stabilniejszy na śniegu, a i dynamiczne ruszenie na mokrym w Golfie też lepiej wychodziło. Golfem mogłem ruszyć na śniegu z pełnym butem bez strachu, że tył zacznie wyprzedzać przód. Subaru było bardziej niestabilne, ale dzięki temu na pustych drogach dawało więcej frajdy :D
Oba samochody miały nowe opony i poodbną moc.
Z jaką skrzynią Forester?
Manualną @@4x4.tests.on.rollers
@@macv6 Czyli 50/50 z centralnym dyfrem. Automaty (4EAT) i CVT powinny się zachowywać podobnie do haldexa.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers no pewnie było by inaczej :) ale wiele osób wychwala napęd subaru pod niebiosa i twierdzi, że takie auto trzyma się perfekcyjnie i wyjedzie z każdej zaspy, a tymczasem nie do końca tak było.
Co nie zmienia faktu, że forester to ekstra samochód i dał mi kupę frajdy z jazdy. :)
Golf z haldexem oprócz dobrego napędu miał jeszcze jedną zaletę; nikt się po tym aucie nie spodziewał, że ma 4x4. :D Miałem to szczęscie, że użytkowałem go przez dwie śnieżne zimy i nie raz z radością obserwowałem zdziwione miny innych kierowców :D
@@macv6 A co powiesz na temat zaskakiwania kierowcy przez pierwsze generacje haldexa, bzdura czy potwierdzasz? Chodzi mi o nagłe lub zbyt gwałtowne załączanie.
thanks for bringing these amazingcars
Haldex Gen1 is pretty good. I miss my 2.8 vr6 4motion golf.
A good car bro
@@alvaroromero5022 Ye, One of the best and Cheap cars Ive had. I have Audi S5 now, but I Still miss the golf mk4
Ciekawym rozwiązaniem było by zrobienie listy samochodów z podsumowaniem, które i na ile sobie poradziły i w jakim czasie. Mogła by być prezentowana na końcu tak jak to robi Doug DeMuro.
How did the golf made that turbo flutter sound? I also have an 1.9 TDI and I make it to sound like that.
150 hp?
I have stage 1 on my golf, around 140 hp But I am asking about the sound from 3:35 , 3:49 . Is it from a cone air filter?
@@sorinL I have no idea...
Oh ok. I thought you may know. I am searching for an answer for a while, maybe someone will tell me. Thanks.
@@sorinL probably blow-off valve-->en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blowoff_valve
this Mk4 is absolutely beautiful
Nice video. The different design of the ESP + EDL is interesting, especially on the rear axle. It would also be interesting if something happened if the front wheels had 50% steering angle on the rolls.
Vw golf, very good ...
golf won
Are you sure the Golf videos of 'one wheel on the ground in the back' with and without ESP are swapped? Every other haldex car only drove down without ESP and the Golf only with it on?
I am sure they are not swapped, we've been surprised to.
Hi! great videos you have! Maybe you can do this also for 2WD cars to check how electronics helps open differential in hard conditions on regular cars?
Thanks! There are some 2wd cars - mainly the ones with driving modes like Renault Captur XMOD, Peugeot 3008 & 5008 with Advanced Grip Control. Or sporty ones like Suzuki Swift Sport.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers what about eds?
@@hansvanderveen3323 What about it?
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers most cars here have got an electronic sperdifferential.
2wd how will they handle the rollers?
@@hansvanderveen3323 If you mean the systems that use brakes then find on my channel the cars that I mentioned in previous comment. Test on one roller, no problems for 2wd cars.
2:51 3:09 this sound 😍
Czy przypadkiem nie są te same napędy ? Tylko inaczej się nazywają.
To, że obydwa mają haldexa nie oznacza, że działają tak samo.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers z tym się zgodzę i nie tylko Soft ma na to wpływ
I have Škoda Octavia 4x4 A5 (2005, diesel engine 1.9 TDI 77 kw), so if I am not wrong it uses 2. generation od Haldex system. So, it doesn't have that e-brake system that is braking the wheel without traction for transfering the power to another wheel. If I found myself in tricky situation, would it be helpfull to apply quick braking (pressing the brakes quickly several times or it is useless)?
I saw this comment under one video of skoda scout pulling out stuck car from the snow: " Use some brake my friend to help the diffs!!!" CAN YOU EXPLAIN IT PLS ? :/
Is there no ESP, no any traction control?
i have ESP and ABS offcourse, you missunderstood me when I was mentioning e-brake system that is controling power transfer, I was refering to 5. generation of haldex which have EDL (electronic differential lock) that is applying brakes to the wheels that are sliping and it is shitfing power to those wheels with traction.
So in older generation, 1. 2. and 4. - th i think, when one wheel slips it diverts all the power in that way beacuse the power follows the path of least resistance on open differentials. Correct me If I am wrong :/
@@Ahelot If you have ESP/ABS then you have TC/EDL, that is the same module, so the system is braking the spinning wheel. The question is if that is effective enough.
yes, that is the right question.... and what is about comment that someone wrote: " Use some brake my friend to help the diffs!!!" ?? sry for bothering you :D
@@Ahelot No problem :) Light usage of brakes should help, this way driver may try to do what electronics should do. However it doesn't work in many cars cause there is brake pedal priority so power may be cut.
What system is best for launching off at the lights? In these older cars 4motion or quattro
In case of these two cars - 4Motion is the same as Quattro.
both are haldex powered so its more or less the same. i'd take torsen one if i had a chance though.
I like your channel very much! Great job
1.9tdi best engine
klekleklekle
No, s3 With 1.8T 👌
Best engine have you had the pleasure of driving a mark 4 Vr6 4motion and then have that opinion view my channel to appreciate the vr6
The S3 was making a weird noise right after it stopped.
It comes from rollers, not S3.
Ah, I see. Thx!
I thought that was from something in the quattro system making that noise.. oh well..
Isnit true first gen haldex 4motion doesnt work in reverse?
No, that's not true.
Przetestuj kiedyś audi 80 quattro, samochód posiada przycisk blokady dyfra, moze byc to ciekawy test ;)
Chętnie, ale póki co nie znalazł się nikt chętny z takim samochodem...
Też jestem ciekaw 80 bądź 90tki..jak sobie radzi
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers gdzie testujesz auta?
@@KM-hc6pf Głównie Rzeszów, ale bywamy w różnych częściach kraju.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers jakbyście kiedyś byli w okolicach Poznania i chcieli sprawdzić Audi Allroad to można spróbować się umówić :)
Would coilovers somehow effect performance?
Something with the springrates and weight aplied to the wheels, or perhaps making it harder to compress the springs on the wheels wich have to 'bump' over the rollers?
With stiff spings, the weight of the car has to be lifted over the extra hight instead of the spings just having to compress a bit to lift just the wheels instead of the whole car?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but be a jerk about it, it's the internet after all
That's a good point, that may slightly affect the results but that's visible in the test. If suspension is too stiff then wheels are starting to spin on pavement, like here: ruclips.net/video/p5J3gvdZwqs/видео.html
Golf is better?
Do they have aftermarket LSD for the differential ?
no
Gdzieś na jakimś filmiku po niemiecku o układach EDS w grupie VAG była informacja że wyłączenie ASR/ESP nie powoduje wyłączenia EDS. EDS ma wtedy po prostu więcej roboty bo ASR nie ogranicza momentu obrotowego na silniku
Zgadza się. Tyle, że w wielu przypadkach ten moment obrotowy jest potrzebny, jeśli jest ograniczany, to samochód nie jest w stanie ruszyć.
A w golfie i w audi a3 tej generacji
Jest ten sam napęd haldex?
Tak. Może mieć inny software.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers to po co tytule pisać quattro jak nim nie jest
@@Bartoszbb130 A co jest napisane na tylnej klapie i na przednim grilu tego Audi?
huskiman123 1111 a po co pisać twoje imię jak nie jest twoje ?
@@wessideindeblack chodzi mi o to ,że przyjeło się w ogólnym rozumieniu quattro jako napęd stały otwarty lub z torsenem, a haldex pozostaje haldexem nawet po zmianie softu zasada działania się nie zmienia. W teście zostały porównane dwa identyczne układy jak by dołożyć np jakieś a4 quattro wtedy rzeczywiście można by nazwać film quattro vs haldex a tak to raczej porównane softu albo sprawnośći układu jedynie, nie mówię już o tych nowszych wagach bo tam wszędzie jest rozłączany ze względu na ekonomię. O to mi chodziło dokładnie;)
Canadian here, quick question. Did the AWD TDIs for the A4 platform come in a manual?
We dont have any AWD TDIs here.
Which generation of A4?
my golf mk4 tdi 4motion coupled with a manual 6 speed transmission
Have you tested a current generation 4motion car? I think it’s 5th generation?
Yes, Arteon and Tiguan, Haldex V.
Open diff on the back?
Why did the golf manage to pull out with only one wheel out to the ground with ESP on though?
Diffs open.
Why not? Traction control works.
its possible to make a golf mk4 4Motion just RWD ?
With this system - nope.
Can you mount an lsd to the rear?
why LSD? go full locker instead :P
Where could somebody buy rollers to do those tests ?
@Andrea Autoparts store
@@louvendran7273 How are they called ?
'Wheel Dollies'
Ale to sa ob takie same napędy wiec jakie tu mamy porównanie haldex
To, że jakiekolwiek dwa samochody mają haldexa nie oznacza, że te układy będą działać tak samo, co widać w teście. Poza tym oprócz haldexa dochodzi tu jeszcze EDL.
Too good for 2002 golf! Unbelievable!
Dumb question of the day: How do these AWD systems (not just for these two cars) perform in reverse? I am just asking because sometimes people have to reverse their car out of an angle park on the snow or ice up a slight uphill slope towards the crown of the road.
That's not a dumb question: ruclips.net/video/NVkyZJlox4Y/видео.html
However some viewers say that is some older cars traction control doesn't work on reverse.
Sick, I want to 4x4 swap my mk6 Golf TDI. Not cheap though!
Quattro ja 4motion are brands that utilize different 4wd systems, most common are Haldex and Torsen. Both of these cars are based on Haldex system, so the title of the video can be misleading to many watchers.
The fact that both are based on haldex doesn't mean that they work the same. Besides there is 4Motion badge on Golf and Quattro badge on S3, so saying that title can be misleading is like saying that those badges are misleading.
Гольф как будто только с конвеера) состояние 5из5
If I'm not mistaken, aren't these both torsen systems? Just different gear ratios?
Wait, I meant haldex.
@@stagmanson4155 Yes, both haldex 1.
Czy golf z filmu jest może na sprzedaż? XD
Nie mam informacji na ten temat 🙂
А что их сравнивать, это же технически две абсолютно одинаковые машины )))
Ты красава 100% , я тоже самое хотел написать 👍
When S3 facelift with Haldex gen 5?
Hopefully in May.
Great channel thanks for sharing
Thanks!
When you turn the esp off on haldex car the rear diff locks the power ratio at 70 front and 30 rear.
Where did you get such info?
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers that is on the mk4s at least. Idk for newer, should have stated
@@2419ivan What's the source of the info?
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers i dont remember the exact source, it was an information that stuck with me since the haldex unit is an edl one. I do currently own a v6 4mo and in the snow it does seem more rear happy.
I don't think, you should've used different engines... The 1.9 TDI has far more torque earlier in the revs and the audi needed more revs for the same torque, more revs means more slipping and therefore the torsen was doomed already... If you compare, don't forget the different torque thats given by the different engines at different revs and therefore different revolutions of the wheels... This is important.
Firstly - 1.9 TDI has less torque than S3. Secondly - none of these has torsen. Thirdly - max torque doesn't matter, it is not used in this test.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers no false, A4 B6 1.9 TDI Quattro has 310 NM, S3 8L with 1.8T Quattro Haldex has max. 280 NM and around 300rpm later...
And no, all you are measuring in the test with one wheel on the ground is, if enough torque reaches the one wheel to get the vehicle going. More torque, the better
@@that_escalated_quickly2720 You clearly don't understand that torque generated by the engine relies on resistance/grip. Low grip = low torque generated. The ability of the engine may be 1000 Nm but it won't generate it if grip doesn't allow it.
Edit - I forgot to mention - max torque of 1.9 TDI is from 240 Nm to 320 Nm, depends on version.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers dude stop deleting my comments just say you don't care, I don't use bad language so it is not youtube deleting them ;) it is obvious, that engines give torque by load applied, but why don't you just try using a A4 B6 1.9 TDI Quattro against S3 8L? Do you need an A4 B6 1.9 TDI Quattro?
@@that_escalated_quickly2720 I didn't delete any of your comments. I can't see any in spam tab to. If there will be any volunteer with A4 B6 1.9 TDI - we will test it.
For me, the MK 4 is the best golf
...and there you see the only problem of Gen. 1, EDS only on the front so if on the rear one wheel spins the car is standing still as seen at the end...
EDL is on both axles, at the end you can see both cars passing the test.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers ...By EDS I mean Elektronische Differenzial Sperre don't know the English word, and sorry I don't think the car has it on the rear wheels so the car moves only because of the 3 wheels on the rolls make enough dinamic force to jump a little of the rolls, but the one rear wheel on the ground doesn't get any Power at 3.18 it takes much to long time, with EDS it would instantly move...
@@petarjelinic7682 EDS in English is EDL. Both cars have it on rear axles, they even slip the rear wheel on pavement. It is not possible to pass this test without EDL. Other indication is the back of the car - you can see it going down like handbrake was used. It takes more time cause power must go through haldex first. That is standard behaviour for this type of awd systems (I mean more time needed to pass the test - if pass at all).
both cars with Haldex
S3 with golf tyres would be way better...great car and engine with stage 1 you get 265hp and 0-60 5.9 sec :)
Would love to see B5 syncro vs B5.5 4motion
@Beans B5.5 using Torsen and longwise mounted engine it's a true Quattro system. 😁
Why do you comparing the same haldex system?
Cause it works different on both vehicles due to software differences.
Guys like me who fell in love with s3’s of this generation but live in United States ... :(
Did the us get the 1.8T?
@@christianhoff1118 yes but not the s3 or even this gen a3
Jaki rocznik S3 8L?
Jak w opisie - 2000.
Wish I could convert my 2002 Jetta TDI to awd without it costing an arm and a leg
Why dont you sell it and buy the awd one with some difference, i bought a 1.9 tdi 2003 jetta wagon 101hp FWD for 1900€ a year ago and i saw for sale recently a 1.9 tdi 130hp AWD wagon jetta for 2400€
Yes, go fo the PD 130, what an incredible engine!
Jak byś przejeżdżał z rolkami k/Warszawy, dysponuję S3 2019 haldex oraz Q5 2015 3.0TDI torsen...
what about audi tts 8j vs tts 8s?
gen 4 vs 5
Would be nice, but so far there was no any TT...
I have them both,🚘❤🚘💖🚘❤
Most of 2022 SUVs perform the same. Seems that 4x4 systems didn't evolve a lot in the last 20 years. And hybrids are worse. Check RAV4 or Outlander. They fail to pass even with 2 wheels on the asphalt.
Both car using Haldex system, so Audi A3, Audi TT and think so Audi Q3 using Haldex system, they are not a true Quattro, because the engines are mounted longitudinally and because that it's a normal 4motitos or synchro system. We have also an example at VW Passat B5.5 which engine is mounted longwise and this is pure blood Quattro vehicle with Torsen drive.
There's about 15 types of Quattro, Haldex is one of them. People may say it is not true etc, but that's still under Quattro name. Like 15 other systems, not only torsen.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers We are reading about comparation of this two cars. They using apslotitly the same system of drive called Haldex. And this system is mostly implemented to the VW vehicle, and the true reason why only Audi 3, TT using Haldex is longitudinally mounted engine, and all other Audi model using Torsen system. And the difference between this two are very different.
Sorry about my bad Eng
@@izetamajka3309 Firstly - the fact that both cars use haldex doesn't mean that they work the same. Secondly - not all other Audis use torsen, there is much more types of Quattro.
It’s literally the same AWD system, lol.
Only mechanical part is the same.
Please read a bit about Quattro and 4Motion in the web before you make such coments cuzz allot of people will not give you such polite answers :D
@@l3g1o0on9 Please indicate who are you talking to.
L3G1O0ON A3 and Golf share the same VW made AWD System. A4 and above have the Audi designed Quattro system.
@@peterstone6307 Actually no Quattro is "Audi designed", rather "Audi tuned" in some cases when talking about software.
Well, the same technology used in both cars. The only differences are a driver and tires.
The fact that both systems are based on haldex doesn't mean that they work the same, if you watch with attention you will see the differences independent from drivers. Tires do not influence this test.
How are tires affecting the test if they use the same rollers in both vids?
Where can I find Vw gold 4 very clean and very good condition ?
Jak dla mnie to lepszy golf w tym teście
A czemu gosc w golfie kreci kierownica?
Tu jest odpowiedź na to pytanie: ruclips.net/video/O1mEqyU9KDo/видео.html
4motion golf...
Things we didn't get in america
Very rare in the uk aswell unless you bought an r32 or 2.3
Both are the same haldex system
*Golf 4 Best*
Гольф в каком классном состоянии...
oxenis ox смотрю и жалею зачем свой продал
Same shity haldex
What that knocking sound coming from the Audi
That's not from Audi, that's from rollers.
What was the point, the have absolutely the same 4wd system.
Different software, different results.
Did you watch the video? The have the same AWD but it works differently.
Very handsome golf
So many car guys go: HALDEX 1 IS JUST FWD WITH LAG'!!!11111 REEEE3. I wonder if this is going to make them faint. Because HALDEX 1 just beat a bunch of SUVs, mercs and beemers. Funny how things play out.
Well, there is a small lag, haldex 1 & 2 are reactive. Gen 3 was first one with some proactive control. The biggest problem of first generation wasn't the lag, but the handling - unexpected change from undeersteer to oversteer. Software issue, not the haldex itself.
audi A3 not quattro, but 4motion !!! A3 and golf 4 same base !!! 😀
Have you ever seen 4Motion badge on the Audi?
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers Yes all audi 4wd is called quattro, but audi A3 quattro (haldex system) has nothing to do with eg. audi A4 quattro (torsen system). The Audi A3 and the Golf 4 system are the same haldex (so there is no point in comparing them), only the manufacturers have the names of 4wd for their models. For me, a quattro is only associated with a real quattro, i.e. audi b2 quattro with all interlocking.😉
@@vytautasmykolaitis Sure, but 4Motion system from Golf IV has nothing to do with 4Motion from Passat B5, right? So what is 4Motion then in relation to your first comment?
The fact that both are using haldex doesn't mean they work the same, especially that it is S3 here.
B2 didn't have all interlocking, front was open.
4x4 tests on rollers - duszaniespokojna channel you are tooooo stupid man its the same shit the same haldex clutch i work at audi the s3 habe a different transmission but theres the same haldex like in the golf mk4 ... 😂😂😂 LOL
@@djemalbajrami49 Talking about being stupid - you obviously don't understand what you read. Where did I say it is not the same haldex? Quote me.
Furthermore - if you were working in Audi you would know what is the difference between haldex setup in A3 and S3. And between haldex in standard Golf IV and R32. But you don't. Later...
Best 1.9 tdi
AWD for subaru is the best.. 100% 😎👌
STI 777 no one cares
wheel ?? wheel stop
Both car same 4x4 haldex
A3 it is not torsen :-?
Correct, both haldex.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers yes both haldex
Torsen diff would help
Front, rear, center?
Rear
@@bilteman_hukkaportti Here is Audi with rear torsen (and no EDL): ruclips.net/video/R10r396Laho/видео.html
That’s bad, ”clutch type” lsd will survive all conditions but it’s not so comfort in daily car as it’s not maintenance free like torsen diffrential
Tutaj to jedynie samochód z centralną blokadą mechanizmu roznicowego da radę np. Mercedes typu g
Haldex przy maksymalnym spięciu daje podobny efekt.
Golf je ljepsi pogotovo u sivoj i crnoj boji i jeftiniji za odrzavanje,ali Audi je udobniji.
Yes, but the same solutions were tested in these cars
The fact that both cars have haldex doesn't mean that they work the same, what you can see in the test.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers The difference is in the wear of the drive. Each haldex car behaves differently. Do the Audi a4b5 + golf 4 test, it will be real
@@marcin6694 Both cars have haldex in very shape. The difference is in many factors, like haldex setup, EDL module version, software version etc. Here is Golf IV vs A4 B7: ruclips.net/video/bHTHP2WuciE/видео.html
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers Ok, but the haldex + torsen test would be something real, something that can be compared here. Comparison of the same car in terms of 4x4 drive, not 2 + 2
@@marcin6694 You can find many torsen vs haldex comparisons on my channel, for example: ruclips.net/video/jld57N9Ramw/видео.html
W tych dwóch modelach samochodów jest dokładnie ten sam typ napędu...
Zgadza się, ale to nie oznacza, że działa dokładnie tak samo.
W wersji 2.8vr6 i s3 1.8t jest inne oprogramowanie sterownika co powoduje szybsza reakcje napędu. To jest jedyna różnica. Mocne wersję golfa i s3 lepiej działają od analogicznych z tdi
Напиши что с двгателем делал рlease
Очень впечатляет,супер!
Unfortunately I don't understand what you mean, translator is not helping...
Golf wyszedł lepiej ze względu że ma eds czyli elektroniczna blokada dyfra 😉
Wyszedł tak samo :) Obydwa samochody mają haldexa pierwszej generacji oraz EDL.
Ale wiecie że S3 tak naprawdę
ma haldexa a nie quattro więc ma to samo co golf XD
Haldex to też Quattro. Jeden z kilkunastu typów.
Quattro to jest nazwa handlowa a nie typ napędu
A/S3-haldex=haldex-golf...!!
I always thought they were the same system
Mechanically they are but there are some software differences.
It doesn't seem to be that bad actually 🤔
Only audi ❤💪
Audi a/s3 is not Quattro becouse its haldex and Quattro mean Torsen 🤨🤭
Quattro is marketing name and it means several different awd systems, including haldex.
przecież to ten sam system na haldexie na tej samej płycie podłogowej :D jedyne co różni te auta to masa.
A moduł ESP jest ten sam? Ta sama wersja softu, zarówno dla EDL, jak i samego haldexa?
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers skoro są zamienne to wszystko na to wskazuje.
@@dany47sr Są różnice pomiędzy zwykłym Golfem i R32, tak samo jak pomiędzy A3 i S3. Jeśli się uważnie przyjrzysz, to zobaczysz je w teście.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers to Tak jak napisałeś powinien być golf r 32 do testu.
@@pudekoksiazka2256 Gdyby był Golf R32, to wtedy (prawdopodobnie) byłyby takie same napędy, choć nigdy nie wiadomo, z jaką wersją softu, tym bardziej, że były aktualizacje.
Subaru have the best 4x4 system.
hello, king golf. Yüksek Tork...
Ahahahah çok yaşa
@@troqhiperhipertroq :)
yeah! ruin those cars in unuseful tests! it's not like they have value, people like them and are rare because they aren't produced anymore. 😒
Why would they been ruined...?
Przeciez to takie same napędy 😁
Mechanicznie tak. Inny software.