"He shoved his *knight* into my *position.* It was the *most painful thing* I have ever experienced. I got destroyed as if it was *my first Caro-Kann game of my life."*
He is Tattle tail is dead We use the word snitch now. 5 year old snitch Not a tattle Really seals in the guilt . Gotta do that early when they can still feel something before they become numb like everyone else in modern society
Me: "My opponent is playing too perfectly and too quickly. He looks like a cheater; let me check the analysis" The computer: "dog you're 800 elo you just play like doodoo lmao"
@@xmipad-rafaelxaverianmulya6084 This. No matter what the engine does that wins against you, post-game analysis will always call it punishment of your "mistake" rather than brilliancy of their play, because that's just how competitive games work. Anything your enemy does is because of what you allowed them to do. Doesn't mean it wasn't unreasonably difficult to pull off.
The cheater probably lost the final game and reported "I was using stockfish in this game and still lost, which means my opponent must be using an even more powerful engine. What a disgrace, ban them right now pls"
Yeah, I did this too, until I realized they were playing openings and halfway into mid-game. Then! Once they realize they're losing. Stockfish for endgames.... Sub-1300's playing absolute brilliant End Games.....
Seems like levys trying new things: "I haven't stopped thinking about how badly I got destroyed by this guy. He shoved his knight into my position; it was the most painful thing I have ever experienced"
@@flexedkumquat MY games are only suspicious when I'm following Gotham advice properly. I once won with 100% accuracy using what I learned from his Albin Countergambit video. To be fair, my opponent resigned within the first 7 moves. It wouldn't have stayed at 100
@@itsonlyentertainment2937 Nah dude its ok. I also had 100 accuray 10-12 move games with the traxler, where I checkmated my opponents extremely fast cuz they didnt know theory.
No we know how to improve Caro Kann now. If eg. h4 h6. it was also recommended in an old caro kann video I just didn't know why till now and don't play a queen move.
@@alpeshbista3484 I closed my account and stopped in a club many years ago because I used too much time on a daily basis on chess. Now I only watch chess videos and train chess tactics.
At the end, you said "you are worth more than a queen..." . I was having a really bad day today, but seriously your comment made me literally shed tears of pure joy. Thank-you so much Gotham.... Lots of love and respect from your student from India.
@@Holy_Kebab crying in my own solitude doesn't make me weak. It clears my mind. Perhaps ask your own father how many times he must have cried for u. Also i think u should rather check ur own empathy levels.
@@sp1r1tm0lecule You wrote "pathetic" in response to a guy who felt relief in a stressful moment after hearing kind words and then decided to express it in the comments. I'd never do it like this cuz it's embarassing and can be cringe, but it's definitely something everyone sometimes feels. I don't know if for you it's hard to understand an articulate concept like this, the whole idea of stress and relief. It would be a little pathetic
Some 10-12 years ago I was in a chessclub in Germany. There was GM for long distanz games and he told me sometimes he could figure out what engine his opponent used because he himself would run multiple engines for houres to win games.
Guess the elo original content over cheater content any day. Yeah computers have been good at chess for three decades and insane for at least one decade. Is it fascinating to watch computer supported games vs humans? For a game or two, sure. But the reactions to and human analysis for guess the elo games, for me, is where the fun is at. Everybody can relate. I mean, I don't learn from a five moves deep stockfish strategy vs Levy and from why Levy's H5 turned out to be bad ten moves after it's played. Sure there's some excitement in watching the brutality of a machine crushing some human player. But it's a short excitement, you quickly remember that really nobody's been crushed there. I'll rather watch a pure computer's matchup like the first alpha zero vs stockfish series. That's the far more enjoyable experience of watching computer's at full strength ;)
When I suspect someone is cheating and I run the engine, I'll run the analysis at a higher depth to see if inaccuracies turn into good or excellent moves. That's usually a dead giveaway.
This is simply great! You convert a scenario that involves unfair activity such as cheating into content that is not only entertaining but also something one can learn from, and not only about the game chess itself but even about differences between human thinking and computer thinking. Thanks a lot!
Louis he wasn’t leaving a hate comment, he was pointing out a statement which is fairly logical and simple to understand. Chess at this level is primarily concepts at the beginning and then near the endgame they’re not likely or at all to have perfect accuracy. This is what chess players study
Also, keep in mind this was a rapid game, and one played relatively quickly at that. Not to mention, he played some moves that he genuinely called out at not the best move while playing those moves. I'm not gonna say playing against a computer matters too much, but that 81% is still decent at that level.
Sometimes there is only one move that keeps the advantage, and I think if Magnus knew beforehand that he was playing a cheater he could escape with a draw
This was very entertaining. I particularly enjoyed that you cake back and said the last part about how getting crushed in the khan hurt you. Very authentic
10:25 I think they didn't take the other pawn because the computer was like "ok I now have 3-1 advantage on queenside, no need to waste more time with this mortal. Let's force trade and win."
Watching you get crushed that quickly has only made me further appreciate Vishy Anand. Dude played over 90% accuracy against stockfish during a simul, some of whom were also using stockfish during their games.
I was like, why is GothamChess still showing as IM, wasn't he a... Oh **** it was on April 1st. I cannot believe it took me till April 5 to realize this fact...
I think instead of banning cheaters, they should get a batch of CHEATING which they cannot see but others can. So that people can actually have fun without any tension of getting rating decreasing problems. It's sometimes good to try to beat cheaters although losing is assured. Anyway, I love Gotham's content on cheaters.
@@Sarah-oj7bh Sometimes cheating can be done for pranking but people should never cheat in serious and important matches where they face respectable players. 😄
19:00 Cheater content is fun and all but it is instructional as well... Looking at 19:00 I would have slightly considered the move h6 but I am pretty much sure I would have played h5 and that h5, may not be the sole reason of the loss, but was a mistake. It along with further moves down the line justified the move Nf3 by the opponent. If it was me analysing my game, I would have been like "eh, just a small mistake" but an International Master explaining it gives you an idea of why the computer selected the idea and such explanation is necessary for your games as well because even if you may not have the same position as in the game in the video, you would probably be in similar situation, if as black you will have idea how to deal with it and if as white, you will have idea of punishing it. Thanks Levy for such entertaining and educational content. And hope you will recover soon from the trauma you had because of destruction of our beloved Caro Kann ♥️
When there is no real threat on you and there is an open pawn, take the pawn. Forcing a queen trade when you're the one with the active queen seems silly.
at 15:48 you could have booked the check with your knight and saved the queen and if he plays something like rook to h6 you could have captured the bishop with your queen and if he takes the rook you can block the check with bf8 and the material would be equal
I actually consider playing a lot of those 'weird' moves. It's just that I'd never follow them up with a perfect plan like Stockfish. I'd play Bh6, take on e7 and play Qe2
Honestly stockfish cheater games are amazing. Stockfish just slowly shoves itself into your position and there's nothing you're allowed to do about it. It's like you have a sword but stockfish just has a solid wall that it pushes, slowly but surely, and it shoves you into the edge of the arena, inch by inch, and then at the last moment it breaks through and turns your head into a smoothie with a brick.
So, apparently he made a few more accounts, first Erionalbania, next Erionalbaniaa, Erionalbaniaaa, Erionalbaniaaaa, which seems to be the final account, as Erionalbaniaaaaa exists, but they have closed their account and live in the UK, so theres not much of a chance its him.
at the 4:54 part when Levy was talking about not even considering queenside castling, I immediately thought of queenside castling when h6 was first brought up. Any habitual opposite side castlers in here? It looks like black's pieces are all developed and if he castles on the queenside he can launch an attack faster than white could defend
Hey Gotham!! I know you probably won't see this but I you did it would make me so happy! This is such a great and humorous video to watch. Wowzers! Holy Moly! What a find. Ill definitely be coming back to watch this juicy goodness more often!
WHAT?? After criticizing the strong Qxb2 he criticizes black for NOT taking the pawn on a3! Because Qxb2 wasn't a 'pawn grab' it put the Q on a strong square! Again, I would think twice before criticizing an unbeatable chess engine
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
"It's really fascinating playing a game knowing that you're going to lose."
Not when it happens every game, let me tell you.
Basically everyone that plays vs Magnus Carlssen.
no many people beat him
Lmao my feeling exactly
best comment I've read on any chess video....ever!
@@MacDaniboi I mean not really? He still loses & draws a lot of games.
"He shoved his *knight* into my *position.* It was the *most painful thing* I have ever experienced. I got destroyed as if it was *my first Caro-Kann game of my life."*
A few words changed and the subject changes from innocent chess really fast
Killing me....
@@VanquishR its almost like he meant to do that 🤔
@@VanquishR thats why those words are bolded
Dude I was reading this when he was saying it
My favorite part is Levy calling that child a snitch
pretty ironic coming from someone who makes content out of exposing people. pretty scummy
2:28
😂
He is
Tattle tail is dead
We use the word snitch now.
5 year old snitch
Not a tattle
Really seals in the guilt .
Gotta do that early when they can still feel something before they become numb like everyone else in modern society
Me: "My opponent is playing too perfectly and too quickly. He looks like a cheater; let me check the analysis"
The computer: "dog you're 800 elo you just play like doodoo lmao"
tbh computer will say the same thing to 2000s
@@xmipad-rafaelxaverianmulya6084 This. No matter what the engine does that wins against you, post-game analysis will always call it punishment of your "mistake" rather than brilliancy of their play, because that's just how competitive games work. Anything your enemy does is because of what you allowed them to do. Doesn't mean it wasn't unreasonably difficult to pull off.
true u suck
@@TheHadMatters well we should look for approval from a computer in the 1st place, its just a tool to learn nothing more.
@Dany V. A. it means laugh my a$$ out
The cheater probably lost the final game and reported "I was using stockfish in this game and still lost, which means my opponent must be using an even more powerful engine. What a disgrace, ban them right now pls"
what they using, leela?
🤣🤣
@@pd28cat Stockfish development version
I know they are cheating because I’m cheating and they are beating me! I heard this at a car race once
You wasted a lot of time
I always suspect Im playing against a cheater. Then I run stockfish and theyre at 60%. Conclusion is that I just suck lol
Relatable lol
Me too. My opponent trounces me and I'm like "cheater" and then the analysis shows that I he blundered mate twice and I missed it.
Yeah, I did this too, until I realized they were playing openings and halfway into mid-game. Then! Once they realize they're losing.
Stockfish for endgames.... Sub-1300's playing absolute brilliant End Games.....
Not at my lvl, who blunders less wins a game on my lvl, if I literally play any move but not blunder it's a win
well don't be so fraglie to think that everyone beating you is cheating. that would do wonders for your mentality
9:35: "I would never play this move. Never!"
Me, a 500-rated player: Me see free pawn me take free pawn
“Let’s make the position tactical”
Instantly obliterated
tactical destruction
Let’s make the position tactical.
Against a machine that can compute lines billions of times faster than I can.
🤣🤣
His opponent is a cheating scumbag, but GothamChess "got tactical" by instantly blundering. Even I saw it.
Watching levy getting destroyed by cheater is like watching a masochist getting whipped.
Truly a guilty pleasure.
Man your English is sure a Massochist
Even though I enjoy it I have to go to Google to search it's meaning 😐
@@kartikeyasaxena3465 what
@@kartikeyasaxena3465 what
@@kartikeyasaxena3465 Its*
@@kartikeyasaxena3465 what
Long story short, winners never cheat and cheaters never win. Well they do win for a bit but then they get publicly shamed
In real life they do.
If you're not cheating, you're not trying.
@@philippinekatipunanflag4372 people still get exposed irl for cheating tho
@@MIDO44444 but most are not. In chess computers can tract moves and accuracy but in real life it can be concealed
@@seusicha Utter bullshit
Levi: The Knight has to go back.
Stockfish: No it doesn't
Levy: “Why would you take one and not the other?”
Me: *laughs in 700 elo*
Seems like levys trying new things:
"I haven't stopped thinking about how badly I got destroyed by this guy. He shoved his knight into my position; it was the most painful thing I have ever experienced"
r/nocontext
thats what she said
Loving the return of the cheater content. Learning a lot of good tips. Many of my games have been suspicious
U in ur games or people in ur games lol 😂
@@flexedkumquat I think it's only a joke as if he's a learning cheater lol
@@flexedkumquat MY games are only suspicious when I'm following Gotham advice properly. I once won with 100% accuracy using what I learned from his Albin Countergambit video. To be fair, my opponent resigned within the first 7 moves. It wouldn't have stayed at 100
@@itsonlyentertainment2937 DAAANG
@@itsonlyentertainment2937 Nah dude its ok. I also had 100 accuray 10-12 move games with the traxler, where I checkmated my opponents extremely fast cuz they didnt know theory.
3:32 Levy: *explaining why not to put the bishop there and cheater stuff*
My 800 ass: "oh look, a diagonal made of cute lil' horsies!"
No one gives a shit mate. Shut up
Levy: "Everything is well protected"
The opponent makes a move.
Levy: "...oh my god".
215th day of translating Levy's titles into Neapolitan: "Nu 'mbruglion sfonn a Caro Kann meij"
Atleast we know how to crush Caro Kann now
Ofcourse he is a cheater considering the fact that he finds the top engine move almost every time!! /sarcasm back
No we know how to improve Caro Kann now. If eg. h4 h6. it was also recommended in an old caro kann video I just didn't know why till now and don't play a queen move.
I think it was a video by Nigel Davies or short.
Anyone of you play chess online if so can you share your ID so that we can play together?
@@alpeshbista3484 I closed my account and stopped in a club many years ago because I used too much time on a daily basis on chess. Now I only watch chess videos and train chess tactics.
17:58 is the most anarchy chess thing he has said
At the end, you said "you are worth more than a queen..." . I was having a really bad day today, but seriously your comment made me literally shed tears of pure joy. Thank-you so much Gotham.... Lots of love and respect from your student from India.
@@Holy_Kebab crying in my own solitude doesn't make me weak. It clears my mind. Perhaps ask your own father how many times he must have cried for u. Also i think u should rather check ur own empathy levels.
Love from India
Jesus Christ this is pathetic
@@sp1r1tm0lecule You wrote "pathetic" in response to a guy who felt relief in a stressful moment after hearing kind words and then decided to express it in the comments. I'd never do it like this cuz it's embarassing and can be cringe, but it's definitely something everyone sometimes feels. I don't know if for you it's hard to understand an articulate concept like this, the whole idea of stress and relief. It would be a little pathetic
@@sp1r1tm0lecule no you
"stockfish has an amazing playing style, not even close to humans"
magnus: am i a joke to u?
Magnus is still nearly 1000 rating weaker than computers..
Magnus is literally a joke to stock fish.
@@xavierlehew6746 The point is that he still has an amazing playing style
@@nobudgetguy No.. That was not the point. It was just a joke about being better than how humans play.
Magnus' opening is sponsored by stockfish lol
An idea for a series: "Guess the engine" when you are playing against cheaters
Lmao
I reckon an overwhelming majority will be using stockfish anyway.
@@53Aquilae I would argue that using Leela is more sexy
@@vladimirtchuiev2218 but Stockfisch 14.1 will probably achive more wins
Some 10-12 years ago I was in a chessclub in Germany. There was GM for long distanz games and he told me sometimes he could figure out what engine his opponent used because he himself would run multiple engines for houres to win games.
"Its really fascinating playing a game knowing your gonna lose"
Basically me when playing blitz
"This person plays bad opening in order to screw up the accuracy"
Meanwhile he plays my favorite opening scandi with 2..Nf6
Lmaooo the cheater stuff being back is amazinngggg
Levy three days ago: “please don’t cheat for content”
This guy: “Allow me to introduce myself”
Guess the elo original content over cheater content any day. Yeah computers have been good at chess for three decades and insane for at least one decade. Is it fascinating to watch computer supported games vs humans? For a game or two, sure. But the reactions to and human analysis for guess the elo games, for me, is where the fun is at. Everybody can relate. I mean, I don't learn from a five moves deep stockfish strategy vs Levy and from why Levy's H5 turned out to be bad ten moves after it's played. Sure there's some excitement in watching the brutality of a machine crushing some human player. But it's a short excitement, you quickly remember that really nobody's been crushed there. I'll rather watch a pure computer's matchup like the first alpha zero vs stockfish series. That's the far more enjoyable experience of watching computer's at full strength ;)
Cheaters content is easy to make and satisfaying to watch and that is a beautiful thing
"He shoved his knight into my position, and it was the most painful thing I have experienced" -Levi
When I suspect someone is cheating and I run the engine, I'll run the analysis at a higher depth to see if inaccuracies turn into good or excellent moves. That's usually a dead giveaway.
people who cheat play at low depth noramally because they play every move quite quickly (3-8 seconds) 💀
We need the Hi-Karu Kann opening, please.
This is simply great! You convert a scenario that involves unfair activity such as cheating into content that is not only entertaining but also something one can learn from, and not only about the game chess itself but even about differences between human thinking and computer thinking. Thanks a lot!
You know levi is good when he has an accuracy of 81% while playing against A COMPUTER.
Not really...Most of his moves are basic theory in the beginning, and then he blunders and the next moves are basically forced.
@@williamzhang8166 how good are you against a computer or levi again?
Louis he wasn’t leaving a hate comment, he was pointing out a statement which is fairly logical and simple to understand. Chess at this level is primarily concepts at the beginning and then near the endgame they’re not likely or at all to have perfect accuracy. This is what chess players study
Thats bad lol
Also, keep in mind this was a rapid game, and one played relatively quickly at that. Not to mention, he played some moves that he genuinely called out at not the best move while playing those moves. I'm not gonna say playing against a computer matters too much, but that 81% is still decent at that level.
Would love to see a collaboration between you and DeepMind where the chess cheaters face Alpha Zero! Not sure if possible but it would be fire content
I wonder if Magnus could win against a cheater who don't pick the top move always, but chooses from the top three
Level* not legal
Sometimes there is only one move that keeps the advantage, and I think if Magnus knew beforehand that he was playing a cheater he could escape with a draw
Imagine if magnus does this challenge 😳😚😚😚
Levi: everything is protected
LOOKS AT THE BOARD
at this moment he knew he fucked up
I liked how you said it, " YOU KNOW YOU ARE PLAYING A NOT HUMAN IF THEY GIVE YOU NO BREATHING SPACE"
This was very entertaining. I particularly enjoyed that you cake back and said the last part about how getting crushed in the khan hurt you. Very authentic
65 in 7
... how the hell does someone hooked right in to the most powerful chess computer in the world still manage to lose seven times?!
They throw to make it seem like they're legit.
They got bored and didn’t finish the games
'Funny playing a game you know you're gonna lose' - Levy every OTB tournament...
bad attempt at getting pinned
10:25 I think they didn't take the other pawn because the computer was like "ok I now have 3-1 advantage on queenside, no need to waste more time with this mortal. Let's force trade and win."
It's always a pleasure whatching levy while having lunch
Today you saw someone eat Levy's lunch.
Turn off ur phone
17:58 and this is how, ladies and gentlemen, only a few words can completely change your perspective on something
Watching you get crushed that quickly has only made me further appreciate Vishy Anand. Dude played over 90% accuracy against stockfish during a simul, some of whom were also using stockfish during their games.
Cheaters *Exist*
levy: i can milk you
I was like, why is GothamChess still showing as IM, wasn't he a... Oh **** it was on April 1st.
I cannot believe it took me till April 5 to realize this fact...
Wait... Oooooh damn this just let me know I was also thinking the same thing
The cheater got a brilliant and we didn't even get to see which move it was....
“If you cheat, you’re a bozo” - words to live by
"turns out that Im Stockfish" speech 100
I think instead of banning cheaters, they should get a batch of CHEATING which they cannot see but others can. So that people can actually have fun without any tension of getting rating decreasing problems. It's sometimes good to try to beat cheaters although losing is assured. Anyway, I love Gotham's content on cheaters.
Or they only get to play against other cheaters without knowing it. That would be hilarious
And they only gain 1/100 of the normal elo. Or, at a critical point in the game, the computer just makes a blunder for them when they click somewhere.
@@Sarah-oj7bh Sometimes cheating can be done for pranking but people should never cheat in serious and important matches where they face respectable players. 😄
@@dragonmaster7574 Yes, I absolutely think cheaters should just be banned, but it's fun to come up with ways to torture them a little.
And if you lose against someone with the cheating badge your rating is unaffected.
That knight move was just incredible. Computers are really incredible.
It was incredible because Levy allowed it. He should have taken it before it ever landed there.
Nothing better than getting bulldozed by a cheater.
My opinion to my opponent :
This is 90% accuracy
Stockfish opinion :
HAHA NOT EVEN 50%+
3:44 stockfish likes to get that queen action 😏
"You are worth more than a queen" HAHAHAH.
I love seeing levy turning a chess cheater into a life lesson
He does not unfortunately
cant wait for the sequel ErionAlbaniaaa 😂
I started to play caro-kann because of you, but man, it's so difficult, although you make it look simple. Chess is hard.
Auto generator said 'Carl Kann' lol.
Levy: "Turns out I am Stockfish". LMAO
19:00
Cheater content is fun and all but it is instructional as well... Looking at 19:00 I would have slightly considered the move h6 but I am pretty much sure I would have played h5 and that h5, may not be the sole reason of the loss, but was a mistake. It along with further moves down the line justified the move Nf3 by the opponent. If it was me analysing my game, I would have been like "eh, just a small mistake" but an International Master explaining it gives you an idea of why the computer selected the idea and such explanation is necessary for your games as well because even if you may not have the same position as in the game in the video, you would probably be in similar situation, if as black you will have idea how to deal with it and if as white, you will have idea of punishing it. Thanks Levy for such entertaining and educational content.
And hope you will recover soon from the trauma you had because of destruction of our beloved Caro Kann ♥️
When there is no real threat on you and there is an open pawn, take the pawn. Forcing a queen trade when you're the one with the active queen seems silly.
It’s a slippery slope once you find someone or accuse someone of cheating and you start to feel like everyone is cheating lol
That knight move though. This are moves that could be starred in films instead of some lame checks
him whenever the enemy makes a move: was that the top stockfish move?
Levy talking about how illogical and inconsistent this guy's attack looks... Me looking at my recent games - :|
Plot twist: That's actually Magnus Carlsen playing in one of his unofficial accounts.
at 15:48 you could have booked the check with your knight and saved the queen and if he plays something like rook to h6 you could have captured the bishop with your queen and if he takes the rook you can block the check with bf8 and the material would be equal
*He stuck a knight into my position* "It was so painful"
Your caro got kanned.
That dude is my friend😂
I actually consider playing a lot of those 'weird' moves. It's just that I'd never follow them up with a perfect plan like Stockfish. I'd play Bh6, take on e7 and play Qe2
Levy you are not stockfish you are cryptofish
Honestly stockfish cheater games are amazing. Stockfish just slowly shoves itself into your position and there's nothing you're allowed to do about it. It's like you have a sword but stockfish just has a solid wall that it pushes, slowly but surely, and it shoves you into the edge of the arena, inch by inch, and then at the last moment it breaks through and turns your head into a smoothie with a brick.
Losing is less fascinating when your opponent is a 14 year old without an engine.
Posting for a friend.
“Black is in the tank” I’m thinking he can’t read O-O and spent ages trying to figure it out. Lol
15:04 What's wrong with Nc7 after Bxf5?
21:31
"you're worth more than a queen"
I'm not crying, you're crying... *sniff* *sniff*
9:40 He actually blunders, with Rd8. This is because of Bxb7 and When the king moves the rook falls
I wonder if Hikaru could get out of that situation.
Clearly the cheater just wanted to make sure that Stockfish was moving correctly
that is a pathetic excuse
Cheater Getting Karma Videos! The BEST content by Levy, hands down. LOVE THIS STUFF!!
13:38 everytime when I start a new game lol
So, apparently he made a few more accounts, first Erionalbania, next Erionalbaniaa, Erionalbaniaaa, Erionalbaniaaaa, which seems to be the final account, as Erionalbaniaaaaa exists, but they have closed their account and live in the UK, so theres not much of a chance its him.
You had me at "you're worth more than a queen" :')
at the 4:54 part when Levy was talking about not even considering queenside castling, I immediately thought of queenside castling when h6 was first brought up. Any habitual opposite side castlers in here? It looks like black's pieces are all developed and if he castles on the queenside he can launch an attack faster than white could defend
1:48 😂😂😂
Levy playing against stockfish. Lets see how long he survives
That was awesome Levy!! More please. You're content is the best I've seen on RUclips.
I propose new title . Engine destroys My Caro-Kann
Levy's been milking those cheaters like farm boy his cows
This kind of content would make for a good series
Didn't he make this video a few days ago with the same guy on March 31st "Cheater CRUSHES Me, Gets BANNED" Same double A name as well.
Hey Gotham!! I know you probably won't see this but I you did it would make me so happy! This is such a great and humorous video to watch. Wowzers! Holy Moly! What a find. Ill definitely be coming back to watch this juicy goodness more often!
Why r there nerds judging Gotham 😭 you guys are 20times lower than his rating😭 wake upp
WHAT?? After criticizing the strong Qxb2 he criticizes black for NOT taking the pawn on a3! Because Qxb2 wasn't a 'pawn grab' it put the Q on a strong square! Again, I would think twice before criticizing an unbeatable chess engine
5:00 I wonder if they're googling how to play that "O-O-O" move since they don't know what castling is...
Don't snitch, they can't see you anyway, says the snitch.
What if Magnus made a smurf one day and got banned by Gotham?
Levy should reply on this comment
21:35 I love the reference btw.