Do you think the O4 system makes a noticeable difference in real-world scenarios? I'm super curious to hear your experiences and opinions. Amazon Links: 🔥 ➡ amzn.to/457G0jI 🔥Follow me AMAZON ➡ www.amazon.com/shop/simonthefuzz (Commissions Earned) Join the discussion below and share your insights! If you found this video helpful or intriguing, a thumbs up and a share would mean the world. Happy flying, everyone! 🌍🎮
yep, best test so far !!! been waiting for a direct comparison between the mini 3 pro vs mini 4 pro ......... as its the only reason to upgrade 😉 although i see was behind a tree ????? but thanks simon
You're welcome. It should do, as the antenna are better positioned. But I think in higher interference areas are where the biggest difference will be notable.
507 meters which is approx the 1666 feet shown, with the signal strength showing red, is still rather crap.... Because the EU in it's infinite dumbed down wisdom, has killed the dB output strength by 50% compared with the FCC version of the mini 4 pro...
I also saw your earlier contribution where you tested out the Hollyland Lark C1 with the RC controller and therefore I also bought a Lark C1. Wondering if the Lark C1 also works with the new RC2 controller? Have you tested that yet?
Are you really allowed to fly like that in the UK? Where I live, we can't fly over other people's property if they have any sort of fence or hedgerow surrounding the property, without permission. Also, did you ensure that the controller was facing directly in the direction of the drone?
The signal looks similar or worse than with the Mini 3 Pro, at closer range anyway. You're pushing it way beyond line of sight, over double what's possible, and don't seem bothered that we can all see that. You're not doing any British drone users a favour by breaking the rules like that as it'll simply encourage the CAA to be more strict. So we all suffer. Also you went above 400ft, whereas you should have it set not to go above that at all, other than over something like cliffs, where you can go higher than take-off point providing you're within 400ft of land in any direction. As for Wi-Fi interference, having housing below makes next to zero difference. There is enough separation, particularly with the 5GHz band, that it just won't affect the drone signal. Trees between you and the drone make a lot more difference. The power output restriction in the UK makes any new higher range technology completely redundant to UK drone users.
The transmission is restricted in the UK to adhere to rules. The enhanced range of the Mini 4 Pro and controller means absolutely nothing to UK drone users, it's aimed at users who don't have VLOS and radio transmitter restrictions that we have in the UK.
Do you think the O4 system makes a noticeable difference in real-world scenarios? I'm super curious to hear your experiences and opinions.
Amazon Links:
🔥 ➡ amzn.to/457G0jI
🔥Follow me AMAZON ➡ www.amazon.com/shop/simonthefuzz
(Commissions Earned)
Join the discussion below and share your insights! If you found this video helpful or intriguing, a thumbs up and a share would mean the world. Happy flying, everyone! 🌍🎮
best test i have seen so far simon 👏well done and thank you
Nice one Simon, good to see you back with a drone video, 👍👍
Nice test run. Helped me hand my wife some facts. LOL 🎉
You got like 600 meters
“Ocusync 4” is just marketing speak for it having an extra wifi band available. Disappointing result tbh
Do you think you'd get better range/connectivity with the stand-alone controller, or with the phone controller?
With phone controller is better
yep, best test so far !!! been waiting for a direct comparison between the mini 3 pro vs mini 4 pro ......... as its the only reason to upgrade 😉 although i see was behind a tree ????? but thanks simon
Thank you Simon. I wonder if O4 makes a difference over the open countryside?
You're welcome. It should do, as the antenna are better positioned. But I think in higher interference areas are where the biggest difference will be notable.
Thanks for the real-world test
507 meters which is approx the 1666 feet shown, with the signal strength showing red, is still rather crap.... Because the EU in it's infinite dumbed down wisdom, has killed the dB output strength by 50% compared with the FCC version of the mini 4 pro...
Thanks for the info, I flew to 2972.44ft and started seeing the warnings, but at no time did i lose the image. Cheers
Yes, the lack of image loss definitely seems to be an improvement here. Thanks for your comment.
I also saw your earlier contribution where you tested out the Hollyland Lark C1 with the RC controller and therefore I also bought a Lark C1. Wondering if the Lark C1 also works with the new RC2 controller? Have you tested that yet?
1200 feet you said you’d usually cut out on the Mini 3
Your mini 4 started to cut out at 1200 feet.
Not good at all
Was disappointed
Merhaba dostum 120 metre ile sınırlı oldugunu duydum gercekmidir acaba
Are you really allowed to fly like that in the UK? Where I live, we can't fly over other people's property if they have any sort of fence or hedgerow surrounding the property, without permission.
Also, did you ensure that the controller was facing directly in the direction of the drone?
Yes to both :)
I try to be 50 meteers away or up from houses
@@EastAngliaUK You don't need to be in the UK with a sub-250g drone. Simon did fly beyond VLOS though by quite a lot.
Get a life karen😂
@@geoffsmith6373so what I bet u do to 😂
The signal looks similar or worse than with the Mini 3 Pro, at closer range anyway. You're pushing it way beyond line of sight, over double what's possible, and don't seem bothered that we can all see that. You're not doing any British drone users a favour by breaking the rules like that as it'll simply encourage the CAA to be more strict. So we all suffer. Also you went above 400ft, whereas you should have it set not to go above that at all, other than over something like cliffs, where you can go higher than take-off point providing you're within 400ft of land in any direction. As for Wi-Fi interference, having housing below makes next to zero difference. There is enough separation, particularly with the 5GHz band, that it just won't affect the drone signal. Trees between you and the drone make a lot more difference. The power output restriction in the UK makes any new higher range technology completely redundant to UK drone users.
The Mini 4 does seem to be an improvement to me from what I tested so far. But I appreciate your technical analysis and thanks for your feedback. 👍🏻
How ppl fly 10-20 kilometers when it loses signal aftert 600 meters? xD wtf
he's not facing the drone 90% of that video.. hardly an indication of anything
The transmission is restricted in the UK to adhere to rules. The enhanced range of the Mini 4 Pro and controller means absolutely nothing to UK drone users, it's aimed at users who don't have VLOS and radio transmitter restrictions that we have in the UK.
@@geoffsmith6373 Sounds like great country
In fcc mode 10-20 kilometers not ce mode 😉