That quote doesn't have the context that most people today attach to it. When Franklin wrote those words it was about a tax dispute between the Pennsylvania General Assembly and the family of the Penns, the proprietary family of the Pennsylvania colony who ruled it from afar. The legislature was trying to tax the Penn family lands to pay for frontier defense (i.e. defending the colony's Liberty and Safety) during the French and Indian War. The purchase Franklin mentioned was the Penns trying to give a lump sum of money in exchange for the General Assembly's acknowledging that it did not have the authority to tax it. The relief from taxation was the temporary Safety Franklin referred to.
He is a clown if he didn't listen during the h&s presentation. The first question I was asked is who is responsible for h&s. Its your own responsibility first and foremost.
😂😂Looking at it again, the glorious Bergmanesque sky and the sheer desolation and despair of his crazed demeanour is 100% comedy gold. He's got no idea about vicarious employer liability either - an employer is only liable of an employee behaves NEGLIGENTLY - if you choose for example to walk in front of one of his firm's lorries, of course they aren't liable - it would be, as you said, your own fault and therefore your responsibility! The state of his car - I'm guessing that every night he washes it and every morning at dawn his neighbours throw shit over it, and he's perplexed every single time. Hilarious analysis again PJ, thank you.
That was a brilliant video 📸 he certainly entertained us Scottish 🏴 what a fxcking numpty he certainly was lol 🤣 loved the bit u said bout employing Stevie wonder 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
GDPR is not relevant for a company. But for you a private citizen it is? This guy has it arse over head. You should always point out that GDPR only applies to corporations, not to members of the public. I love how he says "I'm not trying to throw the law at you." He sounds like those girls who do 1 unit of "intro to law" as part of their criminology degree (an arts degree) - as a lawyer I've encountered THOUSANDS of them. They argue such absolute nonsense too. With 100% confidence in their understanding of the law. Meanwhile, me, a lawyer for decades, I go straight to the law books to check things I don't just start spouting things even if I DO think I know them back to front I check!
Case law, employee was working in a foundry and got badly burnt from molten metal, although there were signs displaying the hazards and the protective safety gear he claimed he couldn't read however he lost the case as it was obvious that he could se every person on the factory floor were wearing welding spats for the protection from molten metal. 17. -(1) Every workplace shall be organised in such a way that pedestrians and vehicles can circulate in a safe manner. Not sure his authority and responsibility extends to the public highway.
Vicarious liability applies to agency. You're not an agent of that company. How he thinks the tort of negligence applies to you standing on a roadside is astonishing. This is a perfect textbook example of a midwit. If he wanted to be a lawyer he should have gone to law school with the rest of us, not just read things on the internet.
Nice video,i remember watching the original upload.Think you did the steelworks and the concrete place on the same day? Don`t know how you kept your cool,i`d of told him to f off. Nice looking at these revisit videos 👍
You were considerably more tolerant that I would have been, I assume it's only because the video you were making required someone to come and make a right t1t of themselves and he willingly obliged.
I don't understand these guys...if a man with a camera was filming inside, the best thing would be to ignore them, especially if you have nothing to hide...makes me wonder if they do everything themselves according to the law??
this goes higher up than UK law,,,,, ECHR European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ECHR) is a European treaty in which the human and civil rights of all residents of the member countries are laid down (article 10). allows filming in the public sector, even people in public and in government buildings , everything you can see from public (even if you point into private buildings and sites) you can photo and record it since November 4, 1950, Google Earth (with zoom) google maps, google street view, DRONE LEGISLATION ARISES FROM THIS LAW, cars with a dash cam going by this law
5:15 Even if PJ was covered by GDPR as he was filming, the guy gave his details effectively with informed consent. He knew PJ was filming. He knew where the video would be published. He knew why PJ was filming. That is the informed bit. And he gave his name willingly without prompting. That is the consent bit. So he's still ignorant of GDPR regulations.
13:05 The employer is ultimately responsible - for the payout of compensation. Not for looking after the employees. That they have to do themselves. He must have fallen asleep during the H&S training.
9:40 At least he did something right. He destroyed everyone else's argument that a video on social media will be used by nefarious people to steal from a business. He's just said that RUclips is a big place and finding a particular video will be very difficult.
Except PJ Audits is required to provide that information, under Article 13 of the UK GDPR. The problem is that people like you and PJ Audits don't actually read the laws you think you already know. When will PJ Audits be registering as a data protection fee-payer with the ICO? He hasn't done that yet. He is required to.
@@streetvideoreviewer Nope he not required to register with the ICO. It's a mobile camera, and used as part of his hobby/personal use. Just like dash cams don't need to be registered. Fixed CCTV and Ring cameras need to be registered, if they record a public place.
@@TheSadButMadLad You clearly don't know much about data protection, and as I said in my previous comment, you have clearly not done your research and actually read the law for yourself. A dash cam would need to be registered if it is not used for personal or household purposes. Auditors are not engaged in a purely personal or household activity. They are collecting personal data for the purpose of their RUclips channel, and some of them (including this auditor) are even monetised. Thus, Recital 18 does not apply and Regulation 2 DOES apply. They must register and also comply with all other aspects of the data protection regime, including Article 13. Whether he is using a mobile device makes no difference at all. Please refer to the definition of 'processing' in the UK GDPR. He is processing personal data electronically. You and auditors have fallen into the trap of interpreting the law according to your own personal likes and dislikes and what you find convenient. It doesn't work that way. This is not solely a matter of being 'for' or 'against' auditors. I'm simply telling you what the law says. If you don't believe me, read it yourself and go and ask BlackBeltBarrister. In a recent video, he said what I've been saying for months!
@@streetvideoreviewer Dashcams on business vehicles do need to be registered. Dashcams on personal vehicles do not. That's the criteria. Auditors are not in engaged in a business activity. Their activity might not be an obvious household activity, but it is definitely not business. Where it is a business activity, it comes under journalism and there exceptions there. As for having to have provide the video, it's available on the auditor's channel, so the point is moot. The thing that makes a channel a business is up to the auditor. Selling and promoting a bit of merch does not make them a business. I can buy and sell items or ebay and not need to be sole trader. When the activity becomes trading is set out by HMRC and currently they set out that making upto £1700 a year is not trading. But that's the trading of merch, not the RUclips channel. An content creator can set themselves up a business when the tax affairs make it worthwhile to do so. But again, that's about handling the money from AdSense and the channel, not the actual creation. And again, journalism covers a lot of what vloggers do. The earning of money from AdSense is for the channel, not the videos. No money changes hands for the commission or production of the videos, so the video is not commercial. An auditor does not become a business just from monetizing their channel. Individual videos can be un-monetized. Auditors do have to pay income tax on anything they earn, but that is separate from having to be a business, sole trader or ltd. It's just unearned income and must be documented in their self assessment. You are picking on a few points and think it covers everything. It does not. You could say they are loopholes. I say they are not as they are not designed to handle what RUclips content creators do, auditors or otherwise. Yes, it is a grey area which is why you think it applies and I don't. Both of us are right about somethings.
You are not on his land you are an adult who can judge for himself if you are a danger to traffic and I suppose you would most likely see and hear any vehicles that come up behind where you are standing , as would the driver of said vehicle see you and if the person doesn't see you then they are driving without due care and attention😮 😁.
PJ Audits - a driving instructor in his 60s who started a relationship with a young girl in her teens. Who he then paid to go on holiday and she had to move into a different hotel because he was so “noncey” (not my words btw) Also lied about having ptsd having had a brief stint in the military. he’s an absolute scumbag 😂
Even after all this time he still wins the prize for the biggest helmet on RUclips. Bet everyone who knows his cringes everyime he wakks in to a room. 😂😂😂
Lot of scrappys are frightened of the police, trading standards and the Inland Revenue calling by 🤔 What a laugh this trappy scrappy is, been handling too much lead perhaps. The scrappy talks H&S but isn’t wearing a hard hat and hi vis in a yard full of machinery moving large objects .
The man seems red hot on health and safety and then at the end goes wandering around his yard with no hi-vis on.
Do as I do not as I say.
Crazy how he thinks your health and safety is his responsibility when you are standing on a public highway
All he did was berate you with nonesense and made a fool of himself for all of us to see. What a clown.
Probably in charge of a few people in his crappy company so thinks he's Napoleon.
I love how they so often say “I’ve been nice and polite”, when often they’ve been nothing of the sorts!!! 🤦♂️🤣
Awesome 🎉. I just called the guy and told him, I saw him on RUclips 🤣
That guy is acting out as a social media troll, but in real life.
How to deal with a snowflake perfectly.....👍😁
its a muppet
But kermit was actually intelligent 😂
He is making himself look and sound silly , without anyone's help 😂😂😂
Obviously this guy was last in line when brains were dished out 💯🤡
Looks like got something too hide
These reaction videos are awesome PJ. I Remember watching these first time uploaded, love watching em back. Keep it up 👍
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Ben Franklin.
That quote doesn't have the context that most people today attach to it. When Franklin wrote those words it was about a tax dispute between the Pennsylvania General Assembly and the family of the Penns, the proprietary family of the Pennsylvania colony who ruled it from afar. The legislature was trying to tax the Penn family lands to pay for frontier defense (i.e. defending the colony's Liberty and Safety) during the French and Indian War. The purchase Franklin mentioned was the Penns trying to give a lump sum of money in exchange for the General Assembly's acknowledging that it did not have the authority to tax it. The relief from taxation was the temporary Safety Franklin referred to.
@@maunsell24 True, and true of most quotes, I suppose. But I feel it's applicable to a wider context too.
That's the first time anybody has told him he's interesting guaranteed 😂
Harsh but true.😊
thank you PJ LOVE WATCHING THESE VIDEO'S IN THE MORNING WITH MY COFFEE!!! " Coffee with PJ " LOL
What a 🤡
Knob.
This guy belongs on a ‘Predator Exposure’ sting video 😂
Not really, he's just a nob. Maybe you're projecting.
As they say, takes one to know one.
@@wix7657 And I bet you don't own your own house.
"You have my name and that's a violation of GDPR"
That's like handing me a five pound note, and then saying I've robbed you. k
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Brilliant
I bet this man would boast about doing a jigsaw in only 3 months because it said on the box ‘3 to 5 years’.
A polite tyrant! ha ha ha. Great stuff
Catweazle has let himself go.
Going to have to look at your previous aeems i missed one 😂
Peter, the best response to the question, "What are you going to be doing now?" Is.....
"Why,😊 are you taking me to lunch?"
He is a clown if he didn't listen during the h&s presentation. The first question I was asked is who is responsible for h&s. Its your own responsibility first and foremost.
What a creepy chap bloody muppet ❤ nice 1 PJ and don't get run over !!!!!
14:10 Roads are for pedestrians too. They can cross the road. They can walk on the road if it's safe to do so.
I remember this one 😂 what a silly sausage, would have loved to see his face when he watched it 😂
Brilliant video
It’s not courteous to ask when you already know they’ll say no. Even though they have no authority to tell you no.
😂😂Looking at it again, the glorious Bergmanesque sky and the sheer desolation and despair of his crazed demeanour is 100% comedy gold.
He's got no idea about vicarious employer liability either - an employer is only liable of an employee behaves NEGLIGENTLY - if you choose for example to walk in front of one of his firm's lorries, of course they aren't liable - it would be, as you said, your own fault and therefore your responsibility!
The state of his car - I'm guessing that every night he washes it and every morning at dawn his neighbours throw shit over it, and he's perplexed every single time.
Hilarious analysis again PJ, thank you.
The guy is over qualified and being a complete Numpty. Hat's off
That was a brilliant video 📸 he certainly entertained us Scottish 🏴 what a fxcking numpty he certainly was lol 🤣 loved the bit u said bout employing Stevie wonder 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Wow PJ forgot how entertaining that guy was you were playing him like a prize fish just giving him some slack then bang back ya come 🤣😂🤣😂 excellent
Truck reversing in across a footpath without a banksman! Yeah they are really hot on H & S !!
GDPR is not relevant for a company. But for you a private citizen it is? This guy has it arse over head. You should always point out that GDPR only applies to corporations, not to members of the public. I love how he says "I'm not trying to throw the law at you." He sounds like those girls who do 1 unit of "intro to law" as part of their criminology degree (an arts degree) - as a lawyer I've encountered THOUSANDS of them. They argue such absolute nonsense too. With 100% confidence in their understanding of the law. Meanwhile, me, a lawyer for decades, I go straight to the law books to check things I don't just start spouting things even if I DO think I know them back to front I check!
They always tell you to get off the road like coppers do, its a control tactic when nothing else is working to get you under control.
Case law, employee was working in a foundry and got badly burnt from molten metal, although there were signs displaying the hazards and the protective safety gear he claimed he couldn't read however he lost the case as it was obvious that he could se every person on the factory floor were wearing welding spats for the protection from molten metal.
17. -(1) Every workplace shall be organised in such a way that pedestrians and vehicles can circulate in a safe manner. Not sure his authority and responsibility extends to the public highway.
Don't tell him Pike. Comedy gold
Assuaging their discomfort is reliant on your compliance to their pettiness.
Another one to you PJ😂
Just as good as DJs Karen at the Chicken factory
Vicarious liability applies to agency. You're not an agent of that company. How he thinks the tort of negligence applies to you standing on a roadside is astonishing. This is a perfect textbook example of a midwit. If he wanted to be a lawyer he should have gone to law school with the rest of us, not just read things on the internet.
This is gold dust. You should've stayed there all day ha ha!
Nice video,i remember watching the original upload.Think you did the steelworks and the concrete place on the same day?
Don`t know how you kept your cool,i`d of told him to f off.
Nice looking at these revisit videos 👍
You were considerably more tolerant that I would have been, I assume it's only because the video you were making required someone to come and make a right t1t of themselves and he willingly obliged.
Spits the dummy out and walks into the yeard with no helmet..😂😂
Sounds like he’s well educated, but his ignorance is astounding.
16 minutes of comedy gold
butterknife.... not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
That guy was a bit creepy, paranoid too.
Both
PJ needs to be tougher.
I think he's reeling them in with the banter and laughter.
I don't understand these guys...if a man with a camera was filming inside, the best thing would be to ignore them, especially if you have nothing to hide...makes me wonder if they do everything themselves according to the law??
Hi all if you watch RUclips and have a vpn set it to Albania and you won't get any ads boom
He's the Star ⭐ of the video 😂 little does realise 😂
You almost got assaulted by a stunt double for Jarvis Cocker.
Is he holding back a tear?😅
Darren is on fire!!!
7:55 The correct word is Gosh.
Could that guy be anymore toe curling...obviously an only child
Any human does not have to read to be responsible for their safety or others
Since when did the last scrap metal dealer speak so grammatical well……
He doesn't shout and swear, but I wouldn't say he speaks particularly well.
👌👌🤣🤣👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 brilliant 😆😆🤟🏻🤟🏻
this goes higher up than UK law,,,,, ECHR European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ECHR) is a European treaty in which the human and civil rights of all residents of the member countries are laid down (article 10). allows filming in the public sector, even people in public and in government buildings , everything you can see from public (even if you point into private buildings and sites) you can photo and record it since November 4, 1950, Google Earth (with zoom) google maps, google street view, DRONE LEGISLATION ARISES FROM THIS LAW, cars with a dash cam going by this law
5:15 Even if PJ was covered by GDPR as he was filming, the guy gave his details effectively with informed consent. He knew PJ was filming. He knew where the video would be published. He knew why PJ was filming. That is the informed bit. And he gave his name willingly without prompting. That is the consent bit. So he's still ignorant of GDPR regulations.
That's not informed consent.
What aWally
... "..... you have my name......"....... or rather you have told me a name & you have pointed out a vehicle ...
H&S GDPR obsessed mad man
It's definitely a dodgy operation with the body language etc
😂😂😂....knob
David Koresh's brother - the whacko from Waco, Texas.
Hahahah good one that
13:05 The employer is ultimately responsible - for the payout of compensation. Not for looking after the employees. That they have to do themselves. He must have fallen asleep during the H&S training.
Which health and safety laws or regulations were breached in the video?
Where was David
🤪🥴🤪🥴🤪🥴 Both
YO PJ 🇬🇧
9:40 At least he did something right. He destroyed everyone else's argument that a video on social media will be used by nefarious people to steal from a business. He's just said that RUclips is a big place and finding a particular video will be very difficult.
Except PJ Audits is required to provide that information, under Article 13 of the UK GDPR. The problem is that people like you and PJ Audits don't actually read the laws you think you already know. When will PJ Audits be registering as a data protection fee-payer with the ICO? He hasn't done that yet. He is required to.
@@streetvideoreviewer Nope he not required to register with the ICO. It's a mobile camera, and used as part of his hobby/personal use. Just like dash cams don't need to be registered. Fixed CCTV and Ring cameras need to be registered, if they record a public place.
@@TheSadButMadLad You clearly don't know much about data protection, and as I said in my previous comment, you have clearly not done your research and actually read the law for yourself. A dash cam would need to be registered if it is not used for personal or household purposes. Auditors are not engaged in a purely personal or household activity. They are collecting personal data for the purpose of their RUclips channel, and some of them (including this auditor) are even monetised. Thus, Recital 18 does not apply and Regulation 2 DOES apply. They must register and also comply with all other aspects of the data protection regime, including Article 13. Whether he is using a mobile device makes no difference at all. Please refer to the definition of 'processing' in the UK GDPR. He is processing personal data electronically.
You and auditors have fallen into the trap of interpreting the law according to your own personal likes and dislikes and what you find convenient. It doesn't work that way. This is not solely a matter of being 'for' or 'against' auditors. I'm simply telling you what the law says. If you don't believe me, read it yourself and go and ask BlackBeltBarrister. In a recent video, he said what I've been saying for months!
@@streetvideoreviewer Dashcams on business vehicles do need to be registered. Dashcams on personal vehicles do not. That's the criteria.
Auditors are not in engaged in a business activity. Their activity might not be an obvious household activity, but it is definitely not business. Where it is a business activity, it comes under journalism and there exceptions there. As for having to have provide the video, it's available on the auditor's channel, so the point is moot.
The thing that makes a channel a business is up to the auditor. Selling and promoting a bit of merch does not make them a business. I can buy and sell items or ebay and not need to be sole trader. When the activity becomes trading is set out by HMRC and currently they set out that making upto £1700 a year is not trading. But that's the trading of merch, not the RUclips channel. An content creator can set themselves up a business when the tax affairs make it worthwhile to do so. But again, that's about handling the money from AdSense and the channel, not the actual creation. And again, journalism covers a lot of what vloggers do.
The earning of money from AdSense is for the channel, not the videos. No money changes hands for the commission or production of the videos, so the video is not commercial. An auditor does not become a business just from monetizing their channel. Individual videos can be un-monetized. Auditors do have to pay income tax on anything they earn, but that is separate from having to be a business, sole trader or ltd. It's just unearned income and must be documented in their self assessment.
You are picking on a few points and think it covers everything. It does not. You could say they are loopholes. I say they are not as they are not designed to handle what RUclips content creators do, auditors or otherwise. Yes, it is a grey area which is why you think it applies and I don't. Both of us are right about somethings.
Silly man-child.
If the guys concentrated doing their job it has nothing to do with health and safety and ge was clutching at straws for anything
His attitude is absolutely scrap with out the s
yer man an enthalpic onanist.
What a fruit loop.
You are not on his land you are an adult who can judge for himself if you are a danger to traffic and I suppose you would most likely see and hear any vehicles that come up behind where you are standing , as would the driver of said vehicle see you and if the person doesn't see you then they are driving without due care and attention😮 😁.
The bloke seemed okay to me, he asked you politely to stop filming, why do you have to wind people up for??
What a wet lettuce
He thinks hes me dad really but hes not. My dads much better looking hahahaha Dude I lost ot Look how silly this has become.
What a bell end
Repeat
Er where is his Hi-Vis then. So called politically correct clever guy with no common sense
Old content
PJ Audits - a driving instructor in his 60s who started a relationship with a young girl in her teens. Who he then paid to go on holiday and she had to move into a different hotel because he was so “noncey” (not my words btw) Also lied about having ptsd having had a brief stint in the military. he’s an absolute scumbag 😂
You’re a little old to antagonize people aren’t you?
You are so polite pj and they still cause a unnecessary shit show I don't understand pete 😅 the mind boggles
Even after all this time he still wins the prize for the biggest helmet on RUclips. Bet everyone who knows his cringes everyime he wakks in to a room. 😂😂😂
Lot of scrappys are frightened of the police, trading standards and the Inland Revenue calling by 🤔
What a laugh this trappy scrappy is, been handling too much lead perhaps.
The scrappy talks H&S but isn’t wearing a hard hat and hi vis in a yard full of machinery moving large objects .
act like a 2 year old - get treated like a 2 year old. Yes you are in breach of DPA2018 by posting this video, the guy was completely correct