What is the future of the British monarchy?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 май 2024
- In today’s world the idea of the monarchy is outdated, but it thrived under Queen Elizabeth II. The Economist’s Editor-in chief, Zanny Minton Beddoes, and Britain correspondent, Catherine Nixey, discuss what the Queen’s death means for the future of the crown.
00:00 - How has Britain reacted to her death?
02:36 - The impact of her death worldwide
03:48 - What is the future of the British monarchy?
04:45 - The new king will face challenges
Find all our coverage on the Queen’s death: econ.st/3RNqd3n
Why does the monarchy matter? econ.st/3xvmijT
How does succession in the British monarchy work? econ.st/3S7zy5V
What sort of king will Charles III be? econ.st/3QMMRrC
Will Charles III keep the Commonwealth going? econ.st/3BGTYNW
Some of the new king’s realms may become republics: econ.st/3dfSbpJ
Read the Queen’s obituary: econ.st/3d16TRb
The Queen’s death is the end of an era: econ.st/3Db6Jl2
How the death of Elizabeth II has affected Britain: econ.st/3BKj4eB
How each generation is mourning the Queen: econ.st/3S3Y5sw
It always amazes me how much pride the British take in the Commonwealth -- evidently in their minds as a symbol of the enduring glory of empire. In my 65 years in the biggest part of the Commonwealth (at least by sq km), Canada, I have never ever heard anyone even mention the Commonwealth, except for the Commonwealth Games.
Same deal here in Australia (except for watching a WWII Doco about commonwealth forces).
For me it's nothing to do with any glory. The people you need to talk to are leaders of Commonwealth countries who like to support one another. The Commonwealth of Nations is open to countries that were not a part of the old Empire. Rwanda and Mozambique for example have joined. South Africa had been pressured to leave because of its stance over apartheid. It rejoined under the leadership of Mandela.
Yeah right! When queen Victoria "added" India to the Commonwealth it was because of pride and not an illegal invasion.
@@johnnygoodman2003 The Commonwealth under Elizabeth was in action, and by law, a group of equal nations. You are thinking of Victoria's British empire, which by law and action was unequal. Two very separate entities. I don't fault you, even Elizabeth's idiot grandson Harry doesn't know the difference.
Pure cannom fodder ,got to have dead men to solve economic situations , etc. lots of blah blah.
I think I’m going to give the guy a pass on the leaky pen. His Mother just died and he’s undoubtedly under a great deal of pressure. Something like that happening to me could easily get under my skin. Complaining about something like that isn’t an outburst, it’s just complaining. Not saying he’s an angel, he’s a human.
Well put
Putin wouldn’t even do this. Charles as head of state with more than one country is a disgrace.
He's not human Pete, he's ROYALTY and should be treated that way. What a farce.
If it is a one-off, yes, but it fits into a pattern of behaviour reported by staff. In this instance though, I think it would be well to cut him some slack given the circumstances. However, there is potential for it to go either way here.
09/19/2022 Terrorist troops of the United States, Great Britain and France once again fired from 155 mm artillery, M142 HIMARS and CAESAR (self-propelled guns) the center of Donetsk, the point of attack was the Jem store, 13 people were killed, of which 2 children were injured and several more people were injured. During August and the beginning of September, the terrorist troops of the United States, Great Britain and Europe fired 291 times at the hands of Ukrainian terrorists, Donetsk, in which there are mainly women, children and the elderly (men are mostly at the front far from Donetsk). 6
Shows the power of the media and the hidden class system in Britain
Amen!!
yep. so much brain washing being done this week and the next two weeks to keep the "peasants" under mind control via the media using "pity me manipulation" psychological tactics (look up) to keep these "Royals" in power. What the "peasants" dont realize is the Queen now King is the CULT leader of the evil Scottish Rite/Free mason CULT the vary CULT that controls EVERYTHING in Britain/US and other parts of the world. Just look at the currency printed = lots of Cult symbolism on it.
When the news says "The Queen served" she did NOT serve the people she served this CULT and obtain tax payer funds for the CULT. She also was used brain washing the peasants. Look behind their evil wizard of oz curtain to see the truth of this world.
Also, what people do not realize is the "Royal" family high jacked the British Crown...their family's first "British King" was in fact GERMAN and did not even speak English he spoke german. Let that Sink in. The citizens at that time where so outraged they rioted. YEs, these peasants of the day stand in line for 14 yours to walk by her casket....if they only knew how evil this Cult and family are they would probably die on the spot next to the QUeen's coffin.
It’s not hidden!
Hidden? It absolutely is not hidden, very much in plain sight
You have to admit the majority of people in the UK are blissfully ignorant to anything other than what the media says and the same applies to the class system too
i think the idea of monarchy is... archaic to be nice. however, seeing him get frustrated with the pen bleeding all over his hand and considering he was wearing a bleach white shirt, i actually felt it to be relatable and personifying. i liked seeing that the monarch experiences normal human emotion
democracy is archaic to be nice too. democracy is not something new. It exist very long time like Monarchy.
@@familyseed1555 yes democracy is also a very old form of government. but i meant the word archaic as obsolete
Its enduring stability contradicts the idea that it is obsolete@@ben4032
4:23 - Yeah, Charles’ Reign will be alot like Edward VII’s (Not the Abdicating one, the one from 1901-1910) that way, a bridge figure after the end of a massive reign who’s whole short reign will mostly be spent preparing for the next.
People will always compare Charles to Queen Elizabeth and that’s why I think Charles’s reign will feel insufficient and we’re all waiting for Prince William to take the reigns, modernise the monarchy and bring that feeling of normality (we are all the same, I am not superior).
It’ll be interesting what the future holds. We can easily become disillusioned with the monarchy and overthrow them, but they hold a power that exists in very few countries. To overrule the government and put them in their place. A key example of this was with her late majesty in New Zealand in 1990 relating to rights in the New Zealand southern island, with Mãori tribes and reparations. The politicians believed the tribes didn’t have rights that any NZ citizen had, so didn’t want to pay reparations. The Queen disagreed, publicly said something and no one could argue with her regarding the matter and that was that.
Would we want to give up that power over the government?
Have a national referendum whether to phase out the monarchy.
There isn’t any demand at all for a referendum on the monarchy apart from the campaign group Republic which is quite small
To be replaced by what? An 'elected' President - no thanks
Would be a waste because the monarchy would win in the greatest of all landslides.
They've tried that. Even here in Australia anti-monarchy referendums have failed
Result would be fixed
She was not the dead of 2bn people Commonwealth; She simply wasn't.For example India is a republic and its role in commonwealth is different. She was not head of India.
India is a friend of Ruzzia and should be evicted from the Commonwealth! India has no values in common with us🇨🇦!
She is, and you people are her slaves
Only a figurehead, nothing more. An unnecessary reminder of a colonial empire acquired via military conquest and held via slavery then oppression.
never was that said tho
There are a few republics that are still part of the common wealth
Not a Royalist but I have to say they need better PR consultants. If they were concerned with their longevity, Charles should've excused himself somehow from the line of succession while the queen was still alive. Will & Kate could've been so beloved as King and Queen Consort. They would've directly connected the monarchy to the millenial/gen z generations and ensured 50 years of "steady she goes" for the United Kingdom.
I think you have missed the point the younger generations stand for.
Its not a popularity contest.
The younger generations do not believe a family can stand above others purely by an act of birth. The majority of Gen z are more concerned with equality. There is no equality in a monarchy.
Perhaps if older generations were even willing to hear them, a compromise could be reached.
Instead they will push to remove the monarchy first through protest, then through entering politics themselves, before William and Kate can approach the throne.
Popularity for the monarchy took a hit when Andrew was excused by too many in the older Generation. Social media has a longevity far greater than daily newspapers. The damage Andrew caused will remain accessible for ever via the internet. Proof their is no equality in allowing a child abuser to remain purely because of the protections the royal family are afforded by those who care not for equality.
Young people all use sites like reddit where opinions can be formed and discussed. Not read newspapers like the daily mail where only one opinion is distributed without discussion.
The world has changed and the monarchy is not future proof.
How can it be when it stands above and exempt from society, and not alongside it..
@@ljt3084 I’m a millennial, I do not care about this nonsense about equality. Equality is a lie. The monarchy is the one constant, the one thing that actuallt cares about the kingdom.
not-so-great britain 😅
make uk england again 😆
fck the queen, fck the royals 😄
@@ljt3084 this generation is destroying the west which makes me happy, you’re all just playing a role and will probably be killed at the end. Im eager to see what emerges after.
Lol, you’re sooo wrong... Prince William went over to Africa and told them to stop breeding, as if they are the cause of all the pollution in the world... I don’t think woke Gen Z will be fans...
I think I was 6 years old when the Princess passed away due to a car accident.
I remember thinking that the Paparazzi's where chasing her and she ran away.
A know it was the same year in Canada they released the 2 dollar coin, the Toonie.
I think I put most of what I know into the location or memory of this coin, at least in terms of inheritance and of wealth management.
@@iltellya Second Hand Embarrassment?
From Kings and Queens, being themselves.
None of our business as all they can really do is set an example and rate based on how well their follow their own patterns.
Excellent commentary. Could not agree more.
👉 whitey in UK are the ultimate keuk 😂😂😂 sIave for The Arabiafrican Horde 😂😂😂
6:33 A temper tantrum? He is not 2 years old. He got angry. He is 73 years old!
And he's just lost his mother so I think we ought to cut him some slack...
ТАК И ОСТАЛСЯ ОБИЖЕННЫМ МАЛЬЧИКОМ
I laughed at that part. Surreal considering the late Donald Trump of the US 🤣
NOTHING TO DO WITH AGE. HE IS THE NEW KING FOR THE FIRST TIME SIGNING PROCLAMATIONS. WHY WASN'T THERE A SPARE SHOULD SOMETHING GO WRONG?DON'T WANT A BIG SPLODGE NEXT TO THE NEW KING'S SIGNATURE! THINK ABOUT IT!
British empire’s sun never sets- once told by someone. Their history was as dark as bright their current is.
now that the queen has gone, i think its time to scrap the monarchy, completely. sell off the crown jewels , palaces, big cars, etc, & distribute the money among pentioners, the homeless & the unemployed. put the remaining members of the royal fammily into council accomidation, & let them get ordinary jobs, or get pushed around on the DWP's "restart programme", & forced into charity work,let them struggle & suffer to survive, like all thei'r subjects have had to do, all thei'r lives!!!
His majesty didn't have a temper tantrum, he got rightly annoyed and upset at ink spilling all over his hand as anyone would. Don't let your sense of proportion collapse because he inherited his position.
His majesty, the Adulterer who married his mistress, and used Diana, a young girl, to produce heirs. Charles has no conscience. William she be King. Charles is a joke.
No! Charles acted like child, a spoiled brat. Charles became angry because something was on his desk saying “I’m the King! In wonder of object(s) on his desk, before the pin incident. Totally lacking decorum and in class. Charles could simply asked for DAWN Dish washing soap, politely asking the staff for a new pin, that did not leak. The Common Wealth is already falling to pieces. Australia, Canada, Jamaica, among others have already expressed their decision to become Republics.
@@timothyblack3322 Oh who cares, I’m not about to judge any sovereign, I’m a subject and that’s not my place. A subject and sovereign are clean different things. And if Canada, Australia, and Jamaica do become republics, you know what will happen? The world would have gained three more useless republics that no one will care about. They can take that fake egalitarianism and run as far as they want with it. None of them show proper deference to the monarchy anyway.
I can only hope they fail again and republicanism lapses for a century this time.
The mourning period has not yet finished and the redundancy process has started at Clarence House so the "Slimming" has started. Perhaps not in the way were led to expect.
A great PR team manipulating the public, can make anyone seem "Great". 🤔
And kings have always in history had the best!
So what’s the message, it’s all pomp and circumstance isn’t it…
How can you have a Monarchy and a Democracy at the same time?
The democracy handles the operation of government with the prime minister as head of government, whilst the monarchy operates as head of state - traditionally a role which involved choosing political acts based upon long term (non-populist and more nationalist) goals. Now they're more like a mascot.
That's how.
It's all a fraud! UK only become wealthy due to robbing Pakistan/India/Bangladesh, Africa etc etc etc
@@carltrotter7622 its the illusion of a democracy that's the mascot. Its a monarchist dictatorship masquerading as a democracy.
I doubt they really have or ever have, those so-called royals live non-ordinary people's lives, the queen's dogs were treated much better than most people and it's laughable to claim the queen worked hard as it's by no way a real job
Very effectively it seems
2022 and we talking about Monarchs ?
@4:06: What is this incredibly important role that the monarchy plays? How does the royal family contribute to the well-being of the British people and the Commonwealth? We expect more from you, The Economist!
Pakistan is flooded with 50% of children in dire needs. Princess Diana would have been in Britains former colony, who are suffering from climate change, to get the international communities attention onto the area. Children in Britain are suffering from inflation. The current royals are NOT playing any important role, besides some light entertainment.
"WE"? Speak for yourself. Press the edit button and change to "I".
@@mutatis-mutandis , WE, taxpayers of Commonwealth country! WE who pay for Her Excellency The Right Honourable to sit in a castle and do NOTHING. The taxes WE, citizens of Commonwealth, pay are to return to ourselves in services and welfare, NOT to pay for someone to live the highlife. Our country is ours and we don't owe a thing to the royal family. We are not renting our country from the royal family. The British invaded land that belonged to indigenous people, not the other way around. WE refuse to continue paying "rent" for our independence.
yes?
@@joojtf , none of your business.
A Changing tapestry....🇬🇧
To me, it appears that the British monarch is primarily a figurehead. The real power lies with the Prime Minister. If I am wrong, please explain. (However, the monarch may be useful in assisting the PM, involving negotiations with foreign heads of state.) If style, tact, and discretion are important, the late Queen had these qualities down pat.
The prime minister has most of the legislative power but is only elected by the current government and can be sacked by parliament or the queen. So they are not head of state and are supposed to be the first amongst equals of the ministers in the house of representatives
The real power rests with Parliament. The UK does not have a presidential system.
The talk about the leaking pen is somewhat of an over exaggeration, the man just lost his mother and has taken on a profoundly difficult task all in the same week. Give him some space.
The stress levels must be immense.
It is time however to have a serious debate about a republic and how to hold together the commonwealth in a post monarchy environment, as the French appear to do with their ex-colonial family.
It is certainly a time to time down the ballooning mass of this monarchy organisation. Prince Andrew has shown us all it’s time to really question this organisation .
As for Brexit, that shows wider problems with the British system of governance and how a small elite really do ‘take back control’ for their own self interests and with it blame the EU for what is really the British elites being the source of the alleged problems.
Going forward the entire system requires a review, removing the unelected House of Lords, introducing PR voting to create a parliament more empowered to hold the executive to account.
Queen Elizabeth was in many ways too detached from the government she was the head of; the Boris Johnson government very much required the head of state to hold them to account, this appeared not to happen. The Johnson government corrupted not only the systems of governance and the public finances but also destroyed the international reputation diminishing a once proud nation with a web of lies, deceit and corruption. It is the job of a head to state to call time on inappropriate behaviour, this not happening has tainted the monarchy and brought into question the value of having it at all.
Excellent points esp re Boris Johnson
The French do so by taxing those countries and using anti-free market practises that were unfortunately agreed as a condition for independence.
I don’t see any African nations part of the so-called Commonwealth signing up to that BS. There are too many economic big players on the global stage to be tied to a diminishing player which is the UK.
End game
2:58 "GROWING DIMINISHMENT" just has to be my new favourite term.
We will end up like America without the monarchy atleast with the monarchy the government can’t take full control of us
i feel happy for the world, less colonism for the world
How?
I never thought I would say that one day: ''Down With the Monarchy''
Hello 👋
That clip with the leaky pen was the second or third time he's bad to deal with problematic pens. He had to get a new pen for signing something at his ascension meeting with the Privy Council. I would be annoyed off, too. Like, my mom died and I'm king, and you guys STILL can't get me a decent pen? :facepalm:
People don't like being covered in ink 😂
Yes, fascinations , No More For Every One In The Planet 🌎 who Knows Keeps Track of the British RoyaLty . I am Even Still Fascinated By A New Clip, or Révélations On Wallis And EdouArdo.
I am an Alberta who is ready to leave the Commonwealth and Canada.
please don't leave without me
I'd love to know you better that's if you don't mind
@@tracyannbanks123_. What
@@bobsmith5441 what do you mean?
Hopefully the people rise up, prosecute those monsters and take back everything they have stolen
They won't. You are more likely to be strung up with nonsense comments like this
Police have to force republican protesters to move on for their own safety 😅. Any rising would be torn apart by the crowds before the authorities had a chance to respond
I enjoy having a Monarchy, I find it fascinating and I like the things that they work around. I’d vote to keep monarchy if it ever came to that.
As an avid follower of most of the Economists insightful reports I decided to watch this report on the Monarchy. As a republican (small case “r”), I have kept clear of the usual media coverage some of which (BBC) are obligated by charter to report. I was therefore astonished and extremely disappointed in the Economist pro Monarchy video that completely avoided the Elephant in the room i.e. why in the 21st century does this outmoded concept that is an affront to a civilized democracy even exist….
Why must that matter?
The Economist are Royalists. They're part of the establishment with connections to the land owning elite, including the monarchy, which still rule the UK.
@@darrenmills9832 Yes you are correct regarding the income generated from the Monarchy, which if I recall, has something to do with taxation of the Monarchy extensive land ownership... This convenient excuse however simply prolongs an archaic institution that underscores the divisive and economically inefficient, British class system. As for all your other arguments they are sadly misguided, for example (i) A constitutional Monarch is under contract not to intervene i.e. figure head only with little to do (ii) Brexit has already triggered the dissolution of the Union (iii) Brexit is also contributing to the worst economic crisis of all OECD economies
@@darrenmills9832 what, exactly, does the monarchy do to prevent that? Actually, didn't the monarchy lobby to make sure their finances were under wraps?
Also, you're wrong. They bring in most their money from real estate (which we don't need monarchs for, we can go with the French method), the money they bring in from tourism is about 20 million, which is about 64 million short of the welfare check parliament hands them.
Sounds like you really don't need them
@@stephschlemann1163 I'm not affronted but would always appreciate a decent conversation. I think you may be referring to the income generated by the Crown Estate which I believe come to approx £30M. Of that, the monarch keeps 15% to run the palaces etc - for example upkeep of buildings, paying staff, and expenses for duties carried out on behalf of the country. The rest, which is the net profit, is kept by the Treasury. Also, ticket admission to Royal estates comes to approx £50M. The archaic institution is a big money spinner. However, there should be room for a conversation. Speaking as a UK voter, I am disillusioned by our politicians and would hate for one of them, past or present, to become our President. I'm not convinced that that particular office would be cheaper and many charities would be the poorer.
Incidentally, the monarchy does ensure democracy. Bills passed democratically by the houses of parliament become law with the monarch's assent. If they are not passed democratically, the monarch will not give assent.
Time to phase out the monarchy now.
The End of the monarchy has began...😈
monarchy stop the government from full control and ridiculous laws against human rights, we tried going republic before and was a disaster! Do you want to end up like America ?
Unnerving for Britain,… hopefully uplifting and celebratory for those Australians who want to dissolve the glue and embrace an Australian Republic.
Hello 👋 Peter
Australia can’t wait to be a Republic. 🎉 The RF are irrelevant and not needed!!
They say everybody will be dead the long run. The case of the British royals is no different.
But people love and like them. And this is important.
The issue of monarchy is overstated,they are pop musicians, the latest act, powerless and mostly irrelevant to normal life, the media show with them is redundant but no-one told the media it seems.
We don't need double government at the top of such a tiny island country, its advertising waste and inefficiency. Remember the island does mostly govern itself you don't need double management. The management structure in Britain is small scale parochialism and backward fit only for maladjusted people and history based. Monarchy is wasted labour it encourages social division,who needs old people in military uniform with no significant military capabilities? Monarchy makes no sense unless you like "snouts in the trough" nation management style,a medieval hangover not properly removed and retired, the monarchy was not properly shut down in the 20th century just mostly disempowered,time to dump the the silly pretence,they not needed ✌️❤️🇬🇧
democracy are older than monarchy.
I honestly think the British monarchy should be abolished
To be replaced with what?
To be replaced with a person that people elect and not handed down from a family to family! Common sense really!
Why does the monarchy need to be replaced at all. Change the system so that a head of state (that doesn't do much) isn't needed,
@@peterhannaford460 nothing obviously
I don't think you can just remove the monarchy without changing the system. They are an integral part of the political process.
May the queen rest in peace. 🕊✝
Australia will be a republic soon for sure...
If republicans can agree on the sort of republic
Well they will and goodbye Charles ! Yipeeeee
Let's see if this makes sense as a nation: 1) let's elevate a family to above-commoners status, 2) let's pretend that they don't have red blood, 3) let's pretend that they are better than the rest of us commoners and, 4) let's lavish them with riches to the tune of $28 BILLION and over 191,000 acres of land. Well, that's what the Brits have been doing and it appears rather silly to me.
Show me another Head of State that actually brings more money into the country's coffers than it costs to have them, or a form of government that generally provides a better quality of life for its citizens. If you look at measures of happiness, freedom, civil liberties, access to education, health care, etc - the nations that use constitutional democracy score better than almost every republic out there, with the exception of Finland. (And you can argue that has more to do with the character and culture of Finland than the form of government.)
@@CozyEccentric - I'm not the only person who believes England's monarchy has overextended its welcome - many British people do as well. Recently, support for the monarchy reached a new low - 55% said it was important for Britain to have a monarchy, while 25% say it is either “not at all important” or should be abolished. Regarding the financial aspect of the British monarchy, the British government gives 25% of the Crown Estate's profit back to the royals under what is known as the “Sovereign Grant” - In 2021, the royal household's public financial statement listed the grant at about $99 million - money intended to pay for the upkeep of palaces and to meet other expenses. You can argue all you want, but no "blue blooded" people are worth that much and I really doubt many Brits are as happy as you infer.
@@CozyEccentric According to Visit Britain's own figures, the only UK royal sit which reaches the top twenty most popular tourist sites in the UK is Windsor Castle - at number 19. Its near neighbour, Legoland Windsor, comes in at number 9. The simple fact is that the "they bring in tourists" argument is at best a fallacy, and at worst a deliberate lie. Looking to another great republic, France's tourism dwarfs that of the UK every year on record - not to mention that Versailles pulls in more visitors than every single British royal site put together. In the event of the UK finally growing up and becoming a democracy, the most likely option for head of state will be an elected 'First Citizen', with only ceremonial powers, to represent a sovereign people. The Irish model would be perfect, and coincidentally costs only a fraction of what the British monarchy does.
@@sman6435 monarchy stop the government from full control and ridiculous laws against human rights, we tried going republic before and was a disaster! Do you want to end up like America ?
3:19 - 3:30 thats a factually incorrect statement. English Monarch is not head on all the commonwealth, he is head of commonwealth realms. Countries like India, Pakistan are part of commonwealth but not of realms..
Maybe they should just give it up it’s 2022 is t there a conspiracy that she killed the princes
nothing wrong to see him with human emotions.
actually makes me like him more.
he's a person, not a face on a stamp
People love to say there’s nothing wrong with a monarch showing human emotions, but in the same breath voice how the Queen’s greatest quality was her 70 years of stable stoicism. Which one is it? 😅
@@nameisamine but they re two different things. Showing emotions does not mean you can't face something stoically
Yea but they are probably going to put him on a stamp and the paper money.
I agree that not the moment with the pens, but the proclamation moment when he gestured for the pens to be removed, showed his “human side”.
However, it’s subjective and some will see his little “outbursts” as negatives.
Great video and certainly epitomizes something I like about the British - stoical and hardworking
Hello 👋
Hi 👋 are you here ?
@@austinedal5545 yes
Alright 👍 then
So how are you doing today?
Two things: first, unless I'm mistaken, Charles is also king of the Isle of Mann, but I've not heard this mentioned in the media.
Second, the Monarchy has be criticized as being an anachronism. But unless you think the music on the charts right now is the best music ever written, that isn't really much of a criticism.
Are you sure?
@@GreedRuinsEverything
Why not
Isle of Man. No extra “n” needed.
The Isle of Man is self governing via The Tynwald, but comes under the protection of the British crown.
That music analogy is the dumbest thing I've ever read. Ever.
@4:45 she wasn’t cool with how William’s kid was using that tool & didn’t want to get soiled, had to hide behind her son Charles.
Bla bla bla, what a load of empty BS, I'd expect something more open minded and critical of this current circus from The Economist🤦♂️
Why?
Charles III should be the last monarch.
Tabarnaque pas de journée de repos gratuit.
May the queen rest in peace. 🕊
Also keep in mind the fact that 'Slavery, Colonialism & Colonization' are all evil things done and benefited by evildoers. 😔
The fact that around fifty 50 nations fell under British Colonialism; while around twenty five 25 nations under French Colonialism.
In the Colonial era all Anglo Western Colonizers did in their Colonies worldwide was build infrastructure, such as roads and ports so that they could ship abundant natural mineral resources, raw materials back to Europe to make fine goods, since there hardly has any mineral resources in Europe.. That is what Colonialism is all about; "Pillage and Plunder" at will.
- For instance, it is agreed upon the fact that Africa in general has progressed a lot more in the past 20-30 years than 200 years of Western Colonialism there.
Moreover, World organization such as UN, United Nations was helped founded, with cleverly drawn charters, by the West; only after they have had enough of practicing centuries-long global Slavery, Colonization and Colonialism; in such a way so as to;
- keep their accumulated wealth to themselves,
- their accumulated crimes not to get prosecuted by their former victims. 😔
May she rest in peace. 🕊
Like I said, 'Slavery, Colonialism & Colonization' are all evil things done and benefited by evildoers. 😔
The fact that they need to repent & repay their sins & crimes. After all, it's "a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do" thing.
Like I said, repay and repent your long overdue crimes and sins.
Remember the saying, "a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do". 😔
"Anglo caused most of the world's problems." - David Cameron, former British Prime Minister
“British society has never been cleansed of the filth of imperialism.” - Salman Rushdie
Native Americans population in their motherland, the Continent of America before European Colonizers arrived was around 15 millions, while European population in their motherland, Continent of Europe was around 25 millions.
Today, Native American population in their motherland is 15 million, while the European population, in the Continent of America + Europe, is a staggering 'TWO BILLIONS'! A sad truth. 😔
Notorious Anglo Western clans are major participants & benefactors of Colonization worldwide, stretching from North America, the land rightfully belongs to indigenous Native American people to Australia/New Zealand in Asia-Pacific, the land rightfully belongs to Native people of Asia Pacific region.
Here in Singapore, a tiny island with 6 million souls lives like sardines in a can, where else in nearby vast bountiful Australia which is ten thousand times 10,000 bigger with a mere 27 million inhabitants... A similar situation in tiny and packed Japan, which is running out of space and land. Do you know that their living room and bedroom are the same place, and that most Japanese people sleep in their living room?
😔
@@mrsalwaysright6478 well said!👍👍
Colonization and gross human rights violations and looting can NEVER be forgotten and forgiven. NO APOLOGY WAS TENDERED. SHAME!!
Native Americans population in their motherland, the Continent of America before European Colonizers arrived was around 15 millions, while European population in their motherland, Continent of Europe was around 25 millions.
Today, Native American population in their motherland is 15 million, while the European population, in the Continent of America + Europe, is a staggering 'TWO BILLIONS'! A sad truth. 😔
While European Colonizers such as Britain and Russia have already Colonized half of Asia, stretching from Australia/New Zealand, to Siberia/Far-East, all in the Asia-Pacific region.., Native people of Asia-Pacific are fighting for a few tiny islands left out there in the South China Sea. Obviously something is not right here!
Moreover, all these invaders Colonizers do is dig and empty out all the bountiful abundant natural mineral resources from the looted giant resourceful landmass in Asia-Pacific, and sell them back to Asia-Pacific nations. True, it has been their largest export, earning several hundred billion dollars, every year.
- In my very humble opinion, Asia has been under attack from Anglo British, since they sailed halfway around the world from jolly old England in Europe, and looted this vast bountiful so-called Australia landmass in Asia Pacific region in the late 18th century? Why didn't they occupy beautiful fertile Iceland, right above them just a short distance away, with hardly any people there, even today?
May I ask why is Australia, a vast resourceful Continent in Asia-Pacific, only a few hundred miles away from South-East Asia had no Asian-Pacific Islanders in that vast land originally, historically inhabiting when Anglo pirates, some 10,000 miles away England, sailed half the world away, and looted in late 18th century?
This doesn't make sense, since Asian-Pacific Islanders originally and historically inhabited and resided in the Pacific islands such as Guam, Tonga, New Zealand, Tahiti, Fiji and Hawaii.
May I ask if Anglo clans have any laws at all for dealing with past and present notorious global cardinal crimes like Slavery, Colonialism & Colonization of vast bountiful resourceful Continents, such as North America, which rightfully belongs to indigenous Native Americans, and to Australia and New Zealand in Asia-Pacific region, which rightfully belongs to Native people of Asia Pacific?
- In my humble opinion, it's about time to decolonize the Colonized lands, and return it to rightful owners.. Notorious global cardinal sins & crimes that West has committed and benefited a great deals, such as Slavery and Colonialism had long been over, why on earth is notorious Colonization still lingering on, may I ask? 😔
@@mrsalwaysright6478 get rid of that vengeful nature, let the history that passes by the west plunder because there is a reason we know that the European world is full of snow and not too fertile and full of cold maybe historical things happen
Why did you bring up the pen incident? Give the man a break. I doubt either of you could have carried on as he did in deep grief.
In memoriam Gueen Elizabeth The Second
All Commonwealth countries have to decide if they want to continue being subjects or free themselves from legal subjugation and become co-equal citizens of republics.
Commonwealth countries or countries with the King as their head of state? There’s a difference.
@@willre00 citizen or subject
Not all Commonwealth countries have the King as their head of State, most of those countries became republics yet are still in the Commonwealth.
@@mateosanfitz9625 There are still 15 countries, that's quite a lot: Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, The Bahamas, Belize, Canada, Grenada, Jamaica, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, and the United Kingdom.
Everyone should be Sovereigns. Everyone should be Kings in their own right.
I don't think we should criticize Charles's reaction to the leaky pen. It's the staff's fault not to make sure the pen worked properly in this important event.
Charles'......
Title should be death of the dinosaurs...how did it occur?
What's in their future? I really hope is prison and the return of I'll gotten wealth. These people are murderers and thieves.
I will miss Her
Hello 👋 Adrian
Hi 👋
Who are you?
@@BellaBimmers I'm doing perfectly fine thanks 👍
It's nice meeting you here and where are you chatting from ?
I love how Xi is becoming the King of England
The monarchy should be abolished! It’s a waste of money, too exclusive, racist and archaic ! No one family should be born into extra privileges just because their ancient ancestor was a great Warrior a thousand years ago.
wait until man finds out about the crown lands 🤣
@@troll-td8nh wait til you find out what the French did with their monarchs and their crownlands
"How can Crooks rule after their leader died?" should have been a correct title for this video.
The future of the British Monarchy is grim , but then so is the future Britain full stop . Let's hope he just tracks it .
"Elites are out". Really? They just exist in different forms.
All of this is as ridiculous as north-koreans gloryfying their juche.
It's absolutely LAUGHABLE that a British Monarchy still exists in this day and age. Nothing but a self serving entity which countless citizens inexplicably fawn over. Hardly a monarchy, but rather, a theocracy. Yeah, the same sort of idiotic worship.
The ONLY sort of monarchy which is valuable is one which is nearly non-existent, but shouldn't be, meaning one which is as wise and as righteous as the Oracle of Delphi, but hopefully explains things much more clearly than said Oracle. Wasn't Queen Elizabeth smart enough to put a stop to the nonsense of making fun of Trump? Most citizens would have most likely done as she said, if she had in fact actually said or did something about it. The USA very clearly has gone from having the greatest American president in about the last half century, to currently having by far THE WORST American president in the last half century, or perhaps even the worst of all time -
6:54 Can’t hold it together?? 😂 Anger is natural, woman.
It’s the same funeral ceremony Kim-Jong-ill got😂
If he can't hold it together as well as QEII did, Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Canada, & The Bahamas will leave the commonwealth, and become their own independent republics. That would be music to the ears of authoritarians.
Plenty of republics in the commonwealth
These countries will be leaving Regardless of Charles … and happily so too!
3:53
Lol, did this woman really say that monarchy must continue because of the Commonwealth🤣🤣🤣 Even though the wealth is not common, last time I checked, they are all wanting to remove the Queen as head and cut such ties with thier colonisers... if that’s the only reason, then the monarchy needs to end🤷🏾♀️
hopefully gets cancelled like any other archaist and useless institution
Do you know that Ayn Rand was a communist? She was also a evil Illuminati CULT member. BEWARE.
nice cover
There are too many loyal dogs in UK.
Peace, Love, Democracy and British Monarchy!
As a kid I remember King Charles (Well back then prince Charles), being whole hardly ungrateful, and easily frustrated, I feel he is going to have to work ridiculously hard to hide those traits.
Hello 👋
@@austinedal5545 HI ya!
How are you doing today?
I think most available name for throne of UK, she is Princess Charlotte... And absolutely she'll be queen in future, you'll see...
Wow the economists yt channel got huge. I remember it only had 200k subs
6:35 It's becuase the pen was leaking, normal for anyone in a suit to get annoyed lol. or have you journalists forgot your also human too? Pathetic media
The fascination will continue as another Kardashain family.. Let them pay tax and go find real work.
It’s dead and buried 😏
Economics showing your hand🤣
Charles is a snob and I have never liked him. I believe that he doesnt have what it takes and would be happy to be a republic. The Queen would never act like he did over a pen and she lost her mother and sister and carried herself with dignity. Charles will cause damage...
Hi everyone, sorry to be posting this here, but - for a small project at my university (British Society and Culture course), I need to find young British people online and ask them about their view on the monarchy. So if any of you are British and, let's say, in your late teens/early to mid twenties, could you please present your opinion very briefly? I'd really appreciate it. (oh and your name won't be mentioned when I present the results in class, no worries)
Hi dunno if you still want to know but I’m 20 from a impoverished part of Essex called Basildon and surprisingly among people my age especially white teens there is actually still quite a positive and loyal outlook towards the monarchy less because of the people in it and more because of our history and culture it represents
Abolishment, hopefully.
Abolish the monarchy A waste of space and money
democracy are waste of space and money.
His pen broke and he got inky. Office workers unite behind the new King!
enough of a monarchy. time to go repuublic
a queen is better than a king
The people are better than both the king and queen put together. Remember the 30th January 1649. Liberté, égalité, fraternité!
For me, the monarchy is a remant of the British Empire. We want to move on from that. You want something to identify with, to be proud of? Be proud of yourselves. Turn the fairy tale into reality. ( Nothing against fairy tales)
The guys mother has died and he hasn't been allowed time to process it properly so give him a break! Venting his stress over a pen at this time is hardly an alarming sign
True
Someone has to spend the riches their family collected for centuries from the commoners and subjugated populations.
For
Under
Charles the
King?
Oops .
Time to get rid
Don't worry the British people are very forgetful, he can be the worst possible monarch but the British will continue to love him, despite them living in misery during the cost of living crises. Long live the King!
Oh be quiet. The UK is the 6th biggest economy on the planet. Compared to the poor world, we are all rich.
Give the time to King Charles III to prepare Williams. William is too young to be a king.
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will be remembered as a stalwart of our times. She provided inspiring leadership to her nation and people. She personified dignity and decency in public life. Pained by her demise. My thoughts are with her family and people of UK in this sad hour.
She will be remembered like this only in your country's mind not by the people who's countries she ruined. Our generations still pay for that and so will our future ones. And ofc why won't you . Afterall, you guys are living on that money which was taken by forced labour and violent atrocities your monarchy did for hundreds of year on half of the world
Which countries did she ruin? Name a specific country. I dare you. @@ekta9789
To stop existing, hopefully.
Wishful thinking 😢😢
Give King Charles a break. Let him mourn his mother before you tear him to bits.
Charles 3 divided his own family 😂
Get to the point please