The bootstrap of rational chain of thought is the first knowledge, which is the existence of a conscious entity while it's thinking about its own existence, i.e. the cogito. The scientific knowledge is about finding out what must be true in order for that first knowledge to have come about, so we can increase the probability for the existence of a conscious entities in the future.
The size of time and space may have varied since the Big Bang. We wouldn’t know. Maybe time and space is also expanding and we just don’t notice because it’s all relative.
We don't know. And even if god exists, he seems not to care anything, so we are alone in the field. And a majority of people think some religion's god especially those created in the middle east, solves a dilemma like this
@@ChuckBrowntheClown there are at least 4 forces in nature, the average force adjusted itself by try and fail so many times for billions of years until we could appear and have a kind of small sense in eyes and movement capabilities. And the free will is just in a human scale and to some extent.. things look organized for us because for millennias humans built up over others. But even humanoid built system doesn't mean a proper system. Its just looks good and convenient for us
@ there are at least 4 forces in nature, the average force adjusted itself by try and fail so many times for billions of years until we could appear and have a kind of small sense in eyes and movement capabilities. And the free will is just in a human scale and to some extent.. things look organized for us because for millennias humans built up over others. But even humanoid built system doesn't mean a proper system. Its just looks good and convenient for us
@@ChuckBrowntheClown You seem to be opperating under a few key misapprehensions here that hopefully I can help you clear up. Look up "Dissapation-Driven Selection" and the "Zero Energy Universe Hypothesis" as a start (I'll help guide you through the "criticisms" of these ideas and hopefully you'll realize that they aren't actually criticisms of these ideas, but of our previous assumptions about the reliability of other ideas, such as the ZPE "measurements").
Good question. The Only One Who knows what is true for us is our Loving Creator. Ask Him. "He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?" And how do we know what is justice and love, and who God is? This is provided for us in the Bible -- which Jesus calls "the Truth".
4:20 ഇപ്പോഴും ഞാൻ എൻ്റെ ഫാമിലിയിൽ നിന്നും അവർക്ക് അനുസരിച്ചിരുന്ന പ്രലോഭനങ്ങളും ചതിയും അക്രമങ്ങളും പരിഹാസങ്ങളും ട്രോർച്ചറിങ്ങും നിരന്തരം നേരിട്ടു കൊണ്ടിരിക്കുകയാണ് ഈ ലോകത്തിൻ്റെ വാതായനങ്ങൾ തുറന്നു നൽകുകയും അതെല്ലാം ഒരോന്ദ ത്തരുടെ ഉള്ളൻ കൈയ്യിൽ എത്തിയിട്ടും അവർ അതെല്ലാം ഉപയേഗിക്കുമ്പോഴും അത് എന്തെന്ന് അറിയിനോ മനസിലാക്കാനോ കഴിയാത്തവരാണ് ഏറ്റവും തരം താണ മാർഗ്ഗങ്ങൾ സ്വീകരിച്ച് അവരുടെ സ്വഭാവവും സംസ്ക്കാരവും വെളിപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്.prof Richand
ശാസ്ത്രം വഴിമുട്ടി നിന്നിടത്തു നിന്ന് ഏറ്റവും ലളിതമായി 1000 ത്തിൽ പരം വിഷയങ്ങളിൽ അറിവിൻ്റെ വാതായനങ്ങൾ തുറന്നു തന്നപ്പോൾ Prof: Richad നിങ്ങൾ പോലും ഘണ്ടിക്കുകയും പരിഹസിക്കുകയും ചെയ്പ്പോഴും ഞാൻ എൻ്റെ ദൗത്യം ആവർത്തിച്ചു കൊണ്ടെയിരുന്നു എനിക്ക് അറിയാമായിരുന്നു നിങ്ങളുടെ തൊണ്ടയും വാക്കുകളും ഇടറുമെന്ന് പ്രത്യഗിച്ച് Cosmos നെ കുറിച്ചുള്ള നിങ്ങളുടെ ധാരണ മാറുമ്പോൾ അപ്പോൾ ഒന്നുയില്ല ന്യൂട്ടൻ ഐൻ്റീൻ രാമാനുജ മഹാത്മക്കൾ arab prof, scientists all of them faced this
These questions about the Big Bang are common, but they stem from a misunderstanding of what the theory actually proposes. The 'ball' you're referring to isn't a physical object, but the expansion of space-time itself. What caused it? We don’t fully know yet, but science isn’t afraid to admit that, it’s still exploring quantum fluctuations and other possibilities. As for density, it’s just mass per unit volume. In the early universe, all the matter and energy were compressed into an incredibly small space. Science doesn’t claim to have all the answers, but it seeks to find them with evidence, while faith often settles for 'because I believe.
@ how isn’t the Big Bang theory faith in what you believe? How can you say no physical and have density? Since density requires physical. How isn’t time a condensation? Since it condenses physical age. A thunderous voice is a big bang.
@@ChuckBrowntheClown The Big Bang theory isn’t faith, it's based on evidence, like cosmic background radiation and the redshift of distant galaxies. It's a scientific model, not a belief system. As for density, it's a property of matter or energy, which can exist in forms that aren't immediately 'physical' as we experience it, like the energy of the early universe. Time isn’t a 'condensation,' but a dimension, like space, that was also expanding. And while a thunderous voice might make a loud bang, it's not the same concept as the vast, universe-expanding event we’re talking about. Science doesn't require belief; it just asks for evidence and curiosity to guide us forward.
When science opened up the gates of knowledge on over 1000 subjects from where science was at a standstill.Prof: Richard Even when you rebuked and mocked me I kept repeating my mission I knew your throat and words would stutter when your understanding of Cosmos changes then nothing Newton Einstein Ramanuja greats arab prof, scientists faced this same problems,who thinking defarent dimensional route from normal thinking,they are they are made their success stories,taj p backer
Full discussion here: ruclips.net/video/7iQSJNI6zqI/видео.htmlsi=vaiKJUyJK2rMQvHc
The bootstrap of rational chain of thought is the first knowledge, which is the existence of a conscious entity while it's thinking about its own existence, i.e. the cogito. The scientific knowledge is about finding out what must be true in order for that first knowledge to have come about, so we can increase the probability for the existence of a conscious entities in the future.
The size of time and space may have varied since the Big Bang. We wouldn’t know. Maybe time and space is also expanding and we just don’t notice because it’s all relative.
What made that ball expand? How did the ball even come to be? Where does density come from?
We don't know. And even if god exists, he seems not to care anything, so we are alone in the field. And a majority of people think some religion's god especially those created in the middle east, solves a dilemma like this
@ if he doesn’t care then why is there life at all and yet alone free will with life? Big bang isn’t saying you don’t know.
@@ChuckBrowntheClown there are at least 4 forces in nature, the average force adjusted itself by try and fail so many times for billions of years until we could appear and have a kind of small sense in eyes and movement capabilities. And the free will is just in a human scale and to some extent.. things look organized for us because for millennias humans built up over others. But even humanoid built system doesn't mean a proper system. Its just looks good and convenient for us
@ there are at least 4 forces in nature, the average force adjusted itself by try and fail so many times for billions of years until we could appear and have a kind of small sense in eyes and movement capabilities. And the free will is just in a human scale and to some extent.. things look organized for us because for millennias humans built up over others. But even humanoid built system doesn't mean a proper system. Its just looks good and convenient for us
@@ChuckBrowntheClown You seem to be opperating under a few key misapprehensions here that hopefully I can help you clear up.
Look up "Dissapation-Driven Selection" and the "Zero Energy Universe Hypothesis" as a start (I'll help guide you through the "criticisms" of these ideas and hopefully you'll realize that they aren't actually criticisms of these ideas, but of our previous assumptions about the reliability of other ideas, such as the ZPE "measurements").
Good question. The Only One Who knows what is true for us is our Loving Creator. Ask Him. "He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?" And how do we know what is justice and love, and who God is? This is provided for us in the Bible -- which Jesus calls "the Truth".
You know what is true? String Theory is not real physics.
4:20 ഇപ്പോഴും ഞാൻ എൻ്റെ ഫാമിലിയിൽ നിന്നും അവർക്ക് അനുസരിച്ചിരുന്ന പ്രലോഭനങ്ങളും ചതിയും അക്രമങ്ങളും പരിഹാസങ്ങളും ട്രോർച്ചറിങ്ങും നിരന്തരം നേരിട്ടു കൊണ്ടിരിക്കുകയാണ് ഈ ലോകത്തിൻ്റെ വാതായനങ്ങൾ തുറന്നു നൽകുകയും അതെല്ലാം ഒരോന്ദ ത്തരുടെ ഉള്ളൻ കൈയ്യിൽ എത്തിയിട്ടും അവർ അതെല്ലാം ഉപയേഗിക്കുമ്പോഴും അത് എന്തെന്ന് അറിയിനോ മനസിലാക്കാനോ കഴിയാത്തവരാണ് ഏറ്റവും തരം താണ മാർഗ്ഗങ്ങൾ സ്വീകരിച്ച് അവരുടെ സ്വഭാവവും സംസ്ക്കാരവും വെളിപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്.prof Richand
ശാസ്ത്രം വഴിമുട്ടി നിന്നിടത്തു നിന്ന് ഏറ്റവും ലളിതമായി 1000 ത്തിൽ പരം വിഷയങ്ങളിൽ അറിവിൻ്റെ വാതായനങ്ങൾ തുറന്നു തന്നപ്പോൾ Prof: Richad നിങ്ങൾ പോലും ഘണ്ടിക്കുകയും പരിഹസിക്കുകയും ചെയ്പ്പോഴും ഞാൻ എൻ്റെ ദൗത്യം ആവർത്തിച്ചു കൊണ്ടെയിരുന്നു എനിക്ക് അറിയാമായിരുന്നു നിങ്ങളുടെ തൊണ്ടയും വാക്കുകളും ഇടറുമെന്ന് പ്രത്യഗിച്ച് Cosmos നെ കുറിച്ചുള്ള നിങ്ങളുടെ ധാരണ മാറുമ്പോൾ അപ്പോൾ ഒന്നുയില്ല ന്യൂട്ടൻ ഐൻ്റീൻ രാമാനുജ മഹാത്മക്കൾ arab prof, scientists all of them faced this
Love Brian Greene, so open minded, ambiguous and a great speaker. Seems like a nice guy too! He should be talking to someone more open than Dawkins
True is conformed by facts. It is faithful and steady has a trusting consistency. Conformed facts with steady consistency is true.
These questions about the Big Bang are common, but they stem from a misunderstanding of what the theory actually proposes. The 'ball' you're referring to isn't a physical object, but the expansion of space-time itself. What caused it? We don’t fully know yet, but science isn’t afraid to admit that, it’s still exploring quantum fluctuations and other possibilities. As for density, it’s just mass per unit volume. In the early universe, all the matter and energy were compressed into an incredibly small space. Science doesn’t claim to have all the answers, but it seeks to find them with evidence, while faith often settles for 'because I believe.
@ how isn’t the Big Bang theory faith in what you believe? How can you say no physical and have density? Since density requires physical. How isn’t time a condensation? Since it condenses physical age. A thunderous voice is a big bang.
@@ChuckBrowntheClown The Big Bang theory isn’t faith, it's based on evidence, like cosmic background radiation and the redshift of distant galaxies. It's a scientific model, not a belief system. As for density, it's a property of matter or energy, which can exist in forms that aren't immediately 'physical' as we experience it, like the energy of the early universe. Time isn’t a 'condensation,' but a dimension, like space, that was also expanding. And while a thunderous voice might make a loud bang, it's not the same concept as the vast, universe-expanding event we’re talking about. Science doesn't require belief; it just asks for evidence and curiosity to guide us forward.
@@ChuckBrowntheClown Empirical data isn’t faith, it’s demonstrable fact. Did you make it out of high school?
When science opened up the gates of knowledge on over 1000 subjects from where science was at a standstill.Prof: Richard Even when you rebuked and mocked me I kept repeating my mission I knew your throat and words would stutter when your understanding of Cosmos changes then nothing Newton Einstein Ramanuja greats arab prof, scientists faced this same problems,who thinking defarent dimensional route from normal thinking,they are they are made their success stories,taj p backer