Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
What's Your Favorite Sound? Between $500 and $1000 Under $1000 KEF Klipsch Monitor Audio Wharfedale
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 авг 2024
- Thank you for watching Video!
If you enjoyed, Please hit the like and Subscribe !
This video is a sound comparison between $500 and $1000 speakers.
KEF LS50
KEF Q350
KEF Q150
Klipsch RP600M
Klipsch RP500M
Monitor Audio Bronze 100
Wharfedale EVO 4.2
Please share your thoughts with me.
thanks
Timecodes
0:00 - intro
0:19 - 1st Song - Remember me
3:57 - 2nd Song - Better than life
7:09 - Outro
Other sound comparison videos
Amps - • Amplifier Sound Demo
Speakers - • Hi Fi Speakers Sound Demo
1. MA Bronze 2. KEF 350 3. Klipsh RP 600
Thanks for the test.
Monitor Audio, bright and balance !!! the winner !!
Monitor Audio will always have the best look finish and Soundstage at it's price point. I love the grill to protect the tweeter. Overall great design for some bookshelves.
EVO for warm sound and Bronze for lively sound, bigger not always means better, but always having the proper scale.
Easy for me. The KEF Q350 has the most natural overal presentation of this bunch. Not the flashiest, but the most honest.
Heard so much about the Bronze. It would e so exciting to Heard MA Silver 100
Super comparison! Thank you! In my view it's: 1st MAB 100, 2nd Klipsch 500, 3rd KEF 150. Maybe I have a bad taste but I don't think so...😅
1) EVO 4.2
2) Klipsch 500
3) MA Bronze
... I love my MA Bronze 100 & 200’s! 👍👍👍 ...
It's a cake walk for Monitor Audio bronze 100.
For me 1 Monitor Audio Bronze far outclasses these competitors 2 KEF 350 3 EVO 4.2
As a metal and rock fan, I found this so interesting. I pay a lot of attention to how distorted guitar sounds through speakers.
RP600s Were really good, a little bright.
RP500s Were worse than I was expecting. Tinny and bright without enough mids.
Q150s were acceptable, but a little congested.
Q350s were surprisingly good and open sounding. A great option if you might be sensitive to certain upper frequences. Metal music can get fatiguing with all those cymbal hits. This would be a great choice for that without sacrificing some of the qualities of the other "rock" focused speakers
LS50s were really bad IMO. Nasally and super congested.
Wharfedales were the worst IMO. They just took the life out of the music and felt muted. Probably great for acoustic or jazz though.
Monitor Audios are awesome. They sound big and full. Bass punch with the energy and high frequency clarity of RP600M.
Monitor Audio for the sound Stage look and finish. No comparison.I think the best well rounded out of the bunch. I would personally go to the Monitor Audio Silver 100s. Very refined especially for vocals and instrumentals and horns.
Do you really think that what you're hearing on youtube, through god knows what gear you have, and recorded by god knows what microphone - is accurate?
People, these tutorials are fun, but they have absolutely no correlation to what you hear in the real world. That microphone might record things differently, it might accentuate some frequencies, your headphones/speakers will also add colour to the music. There is no way you can judge speakers like that.
I liked the Bronze overall... btw... throw those focals in the mix! ;)
Q350 and Bronze were my fav's
Wharfedale are the best as they produce a more natural sound and are warmer. I can only listen to hi treble for a while before switching off
Thank you man I really appreciate it, because everyone has different teast 👍.. For me audio monitor, ls50 and Evo 4.2 are the best👌❤️
Monitor audio Bronze 100 sounded best
1). Q350
2). EVO 4.2 (Rolled off highs, may be due to marantz warm sound signature)
3). Bronze 100
1.Ma bronze
2.Kef q 350
3.Klipsch 600m
Evo 4.2, followed by the Q350 then surprisingly the RP500M. Im an english speaker kind of guy so the last one is surprising, and the LS50 just lost the plot here. The RP600M is just rubbish, the Q150 sounds small, the Bronze 100 sounded a little too bright with its 'copy and paste' treble.
I have the LS50 and Im sure it doesnt sound like that though. Might be selling it off and getting the Wireless 2 if I can pawn my left nut. Or the Metas, since I already have amps. And I wont need to pawn my balls for it.
Try doing a comparison of the Wharfedale Diamond 12.2, I just bought it a couple of months ago and Im in love with how it sounds. Its touted by many reviewers as the best speaker under 500 bucks and I totally agree. In fact I like it more than my LS50, maybe because my amps are not powerful enough to drive them to its full capability.
Yeah, the RP500Ms sounded really good, not as high pitched and high-end focused as I've heard elsewhere, or even compared to the 5600. I liked the Q350 a little more than the 4.2 in this demo, but that might be because it was on the floor. It sounded a little flat.
KEF Q350 👌
Warm sound: KEF Q350 best. Lively sound: MA Bronze best.
MA is bright and clear, has a modern design. KEF Q350 is similar. KEF LS50 is so surprisingly thin at vocal. Klipsh has a good look (MA and KEF in white are still better for me), but the sound is not my cup of tee. Wharfedales looks so old-school and cheap.
And I took myself Wharfedale EVO 4.2 ... I have not come yet. Now I worry, I did a wonderful choice or not ...? The room is small. With the Yamaha R N 402 receiver ... Thank you zp rollers. Huge work.
so how's the evo 4.2? do you like it?
@@mbagus7151 I bought over the internet. Haven't arrived yet...
How is it now do you like it?
@@Flightsimmovies Alas. Haven't listened yet. Only in a week will be able to listen. I will write
Which one will be a better choice for a 20*13*9 room with denon 4700h
Klipsch 620f(fronts)+Klipsch R52C centre+Klipsch R51M surrounds
Or
KEF Q350 fronts+KEF Q650 centre+Q150 surrounds
Monitor Audio is played more smoothly to my taste of all.
Q350 , kliph, и monitor audio, вот что мне понравилось
Please tell who's is the song "Remember me"?
What are songs please from what band
N.1 is Bronze 100 big and rich sound and than Q350 but this one is more balanced.
thanks for sharing!
Para ustedes cuál fue el mejor? Me interesa mucho porque estoy buscando uno de estos modelos
thanks, I like KEF and wharfedale soune...
Sorprisingly, in this comparison, I like the MA Bronze, the Q350, and the RP500M the most. The RP600M is the worst, followed by the Q150. The midrange on the EVO and LS50 sounds too nasal to me, and the LS50 Meta is much, much better than the older LS50 used here
Pretty much this.
me too! Although I think I like the Q350s a little more.
I thought the Evo sounded a little flat, bit could be because it was on the floor. But even the high end seemed a little more rolled off than normal.
I don't want to spend so much at the moment on a new pair of speakers, so I'm edging toward the Q350s.
From greece, please test mission lx 3mk 2!
monitor bronze 100
Lol the Klipsch RP-600 sounds so crappy. The Monitor Audio's take the crown here.
LS50 sounds most natural to me.
Yeah~
Why is the sound quality bad? Is it about media or mic? It sounds like 96kbps mp3...
You're listening to heavily compressed youtube audio, of course it's not high quality....
The same for my headphone. just sounds noisy and flat. But I still can hear some difference between those speakers 😂
1st = 100 % Monitor Audio
2 Place Wharfedale
3 Klipsch
The differences in spectral sound balance are quite large and each speaker has its own signature!
The playback room own sound signature colors the result too!
And of course the recording itself has a big influence on the perceived overall sound balance!
More controlled conditions are required!
Love these comparisons! Is there any chance you can add time markers like Will Frank did in the comments to this video?: ruclips.net/video/JKk3FZuaHxU/видео.html
thanks, I put the timecodes. I will not forget it next time~
All are either dull, sharp or have so much mid that I can't handle them. What the hell do I do now? I'm sticking with my Tannoy Gold 8's. Just killer flat representation and articulate AND warm when you need them to be. I will say the KEF in this video are all missing pronounced cymbals and some of the pings in the music are just flat out missing. The monitor audio have it all but way to much mid and top in your face.The Klipsch are the worst in this video which is odd because the Q150 have always sounded muted with to much cabinet resonance. And again the Q150, 350 and LS50 here have mid-range overtaking the bass and highs. So i guess I would pick the Monitor audio as second to Tannoy powered Gold 8's.
On top of that I have lost track of which mic you are using to record these videos. So that changes the room and the room changes the transfer of sound. So these videos are just fun as apposed to actually hearing the speakers in room.
Thanks for the videos I enjoy them all just the same.
Whats the point? You will hear your headphones or your own speakers. You have to be in the room to hear the speakers. In stead of this, im sorry to say pointless music playback. Give your personal opinion😊
The change is too quick
I don't like any
This video is proof this guys mic is junk.