It doesn't matter which organisation it is but nobody can do their job anymore ! It all revolves round just getting as much money out of people as they can & when anything goes wrong they try & wash their hands of the whole situation !
Correct route would be to take them to court. Those companies never show up because they think they are untouchable. They don't show up so you win the case by default. They still won't pay up and that's when you get a bailiff to do the dirty work. Think of the impact when a multi-million pounds company has to deal with a bailiff impounding thousands of pounds worth of stuff over a silly dispute over what was a £350+ bill, but has now escalated into £1800. And bailiffs are always like "Yeah , that's a 1000 pound computer, but at auction it will get £50 max plus there are storage costs."
Is the debt recovery company regulated by the FCA? If it is, I would suggest asking them to provide proof that the debt belongs to you and informing them that you may escalate the matter to the Financial Ombudsman Service. If the FOS investigates, they will charge the investigation costs to the debt recovery company. This often motivates companies to find a resolution.
all the details about the issue have not been mentioned. there must be more to it. you must bbe involved somewhere.if not just ignore it and go to court.
@byMRTNjournals I agree! However, in this case, and in all the other situations I've seen and myself witnessed, the simplistic direction is the best course. Having them apologise either by letter or monetarily is a long, drawn-out process. This is aided by an initial cease and desist showing you want to end the issue immediately RATHER than try in courts. ...and it absolutely works. Especially if you place a fee schedule from the point of the C&D notice's initial posting, which can be done in the small claims court and is simpler than elsewhere. Now, I am assuming here their documents are NOT in order, and they do NOT have the deeds of assignment. Cheers 🇬🇧 Edited because of spullin'
The amount of money involved in this dispute is meaningless to both companies involved. Why wouldn't Nikon just pay the amount, and why wouldn't UPS just drop it? What's 350 pound going to do for either company? I get it, you don't stay rich giving out handouts but they aint about to go broke from this.
I hope you know that recording the call is against the law and then publishing it on RUclips is even worse. When (not if) they see this you are going to be in a whole world of trouble.
Not only is it not a problem to record as such in the UK, its also not an issue to upload it to ANY media source. The only issue is that UPS might wish it removed from RUclips, which in itself is not an issue.😊😊
BS. GDPR is only so companies don't abuse data subjects ie civilians. Civilians are absolutely allowed to record and upload phone calls with companies unless it is explicitly stated beforehand the call is confidential or has client confidentiality. This is for journalistic freedoms and the freedom of information act
you have a very calm demeanour. I would have lost it with them by now
I wouldn't call that calm, he's a nervous wreck hugging himself for comfort 😂😂😂
It doesn't matter which organisation it is but nobody can do their job anymore ! It all revolves round just getting as much money out of people as they can & when anything goes wrong they try & wash their hands of the whole situation !
Ask to speak to legal not collections, make them aware you will be billing them for your time from this point onward.
Bill for time, like a sov cit ? Don’t be daft
@@coderider3022 You can absolutely make a MCOL for your costs, which can include your time, if as result of a third parties negligence.
I use to work for UPS. They lie to your face.
indeed.
Correct route would be to take them to court. Those companies never show up because they think they are untouchable.
They don't show up so you win the case by default. They still won't pay up and that's when you get a bailiff to do the dirty work. Think of the impact when a multi-million pounds company has to deal with a bailiff impounding thousands of pounds worth of stuff over a silly dispute over what was a £350+ bill, but has now escalated into £1800. And bailiffs are always like "Yeah , that's a 1000 pound computer, but at auction it will get £50 max plus there are storage costs."
UPS lied to me too shipped a letter for €12 to a local place they never delivered it and refused to give me a refund and lied to me.
Is the debt recovery company regulated by the FCA? If it is, I would suggest asking them to provide proof that the debt belongs to you and informing them that you may escalate the matter to the Financial Ombudsman Service. If the FOS investigates, they will charge the investigation costs to the debt recovery company. This often motivates companies to find a resolution.
Just argue this in civil court pointless contacting them over and over and getting no further
all the details about the issue have not been mentioned. there must be more to it. you must bbe involved somewhere.if not just ignore it and go to court.
I WOULD JUST TELL THEM TO F-OFF SEE YOU IN COURT
You need to write a cease and desist letter to all concerned
Not at all. It's fraud already by passing a disputed debt to enforcement
@byMRTNjournals I agree! However, in this case, and in all the other situations I've seen and myself witnessed, the simplistic direction is the best course. Having them apologise either by letter or monetarily is a long, drawn-out process.
This is aided by an initial cease and desist showing you want to end the issue immediately RATHER than try in courts.
...and it absolutely works. Especially if you place a fee schedule from the point of the C&D notice's initial posting, which can be done in the small claims court and is simpler than elsewhere.
Now, I am assuming here their documents are NOT in order, and they do NOT have the deeds of assignment.
Cheers 🇬🇧
Edited because of spullin'
You need to formally send them all your details then if it’s taken to court, your defence is sold. I wouldn’t ignore it as you would lose by default.
No one cares it starts at the top. Any one that knew anything,or cared has been let go or retired.
UPS lol try working for them, awful company, so rigid and so capitalist
UPS Useless Prices Shit
The amount of money involved in this dispute is meaningless to both companies involved. Why wouldn't Nikon just pay the amount, and why wouldn't UPS just drop it? What's 350 pound going to do for either company? I get it, you don't stay rich giving out handouts but they aint about to go broke from this.
Stop talking. Send an email. Give a time demand for it to cease. When the date expires forget it. Stop wasting your time with robot employees.
I hope you know that recording the call is against the law and then publishing it on RUclips is even worse. When (not if) they see this you are going to be in a whole world of trouble.
It’s not illegal to record a phone call in the uk posting it on RUclips is a different matter
Not only is it not a problem to record as such in the UK, its also not an issue to upload it to ANY media source.
The only issue is that UPS might wish it removed from RUclips, which in itself is not an issue.😊😊
No shit sherlock. Go ahead, prosecute.
Go cry a river troll
BS. GDPR is only so companies don't abuse data subjects ie civilians. Civilians are absolutely allowed to record and upload phone calls with companies unless it is explicitly stated beforehand the call is confidential or has client confidentiality. This is for journalistic freedoms and the freedom of information act