Storm Shadow Is Intercepted By Russia, But How?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 июл 2023
- So how did Russia intercept the Storm Shadow? When discussing the interception of Storm Shadow missiles by Russian forces, it is essential to acknowledge the exceptional radar systems employed by Russia. These state-of-the-art systems are widely recognized as some of the best in the world, and their remarkable effectiveness in detecting and intercepting Storm Shadow missiles cannot be overlooked. Russia has additionally advanced its over-the-horizon or OTH radar systems. These systems have the capacity to provide early warnings of missile attacks from thousands of miles away, further raising the difficulty level for a Storm Shadow missile to evade detection. It can be said that the effectiveness of Russia's Storm Shadow missile interception largely depends on their advanced warning systems, which play a critical role in timely detection of incoming missiles. These systems are instrumental in providing early alerts, allowing Russian defense systems to respond promptly and effectively.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv 
Наука
Because its not against Afghanistan,Iraq, Libya.
They were hunting hares in those countries , they are trying to hunt a bear with claws bared .. will get mauled .
Très bonne explication Bravo à vous !
@@mnoorbhaitrès bonne commentaire
@@hainguyendong3959 English please , apologies for French .
True..even a "invisible" US plane was shotdown with a 60.s air defense system
People have vastly underestimated the russians, and overestimated themselves
As in previous times.
Nothing changes, oh yes, now it’s not “tigers” that are burning, but “leopards.
Russia spends less on this war by using Russian lives as weapons. Old Russian logic in a un modern country do to socialism spending and greedy oilgrachy spending country profits on personal yachts .
Underestimated to the extreme and i primarily blame the British establishment for that. Through their outfit Bellingcat, they are able to spread blatant lies and propaganda how supposedly the Russian are losing the war, using shovels etc. They were also instrumental in staging the "Bucha massacre" propaganda last year where you can clearly see the laid out bodies on the street were manipulated and moved into place, some of which were alive crisis actors clearly moving in the footage. They have in the past staged similar provocation events like "Barrel bombs" in Syria, "Skripal poisoning" back home etc. The Brits have a declining military, their entire armed forces can easily fit in a football stadium, however they are the masters at propaganda and dissemination of disinformation.
The world and the kremlin over estimated Russia. Is China a straw dog.? This simple propaganda.
The leaperd tank's were being destroyed before they were deployed and zero challenger tanks destroyed.
Despite the shortcomings of the Russian army, Russia remains a developed country and produces good weapons, this was forgotten by many Westerners who are used to fighting underdeveloped countries
russia have the gdp of spain for a bigger population. by the book it's underdeveloped. they make their money not by a developed economy but by selling oil and grain.
all their tech in their stuff is from the western world. Even china dont have chips designer as good as USA one. It's reality. If Nato (full ) fight russia ( without nuclear stuff) in 3 months it's done. and russia knows that very well that's why Poutine is afraid and constantly saber rattling the nuclear threat.
@@TheBlackManMythLegend Yeah, underdeveloped Russia just destroyed a 2nd largest European country in the modern age, 6 million Ukranians even joined Russia while Ukraine has 10 million refugees all over the world. Awesome underdeveloped country fighting a well supplied opponent like Ukraine. Many destroyed Ukranian cities and Ukraine keep bombing itself it's territory, while Russia help bombing Ukraine.
@@TheBlackManMythLegend Under estimate Russia and they will destroy anyone. They have capability which does not depend on GDP. They are the most advanced nation in terms of military technology today. What has GDP GOT TO DO WITH MILITARY MIGHT? The West is undergoing all types of humiliation from the Russians, both on the economic front, energy and food front and finally on the military front.
@@TheBlackManMythLegendSince when the GDP is a development parameter? The US has widespread poverty from Skid Row to Kensington, the infrastructure is crumbling, 40 million americans are on foodstamps and the middle class was destroyed. Russians are living way better than americans.
*Don't forget Russian electronic warfare planes switched off USS Donald Cook in the Baltic Sea a few years ago*
USS Donald Duck
Exactly. Himars , after initial success has been blunted TOO.@@josephhudson8829
Yes, nice disney fairy tale
Look it up on Google dude@@vristeciorao
Yes, I remember the Panic.
lol russia "theoretically" has the ability to intercept cruise missiles. the russians generally are very good at missile defense,
Exactly. The way they are coping is so funny to watch. They’ve convinced themselves that they are the best while Russia is a backwards country. Reality is a b*tch.
Israeli missiles already proved how good ruski missile defense is :)
@@mosnicolae1678against Hamas or Hezbollah 😁😁😁😁🌈🌈🌈
@@mosnicolae1678what against a makeshift diy foe bruh 💀
They didn't stop the two subsonic missiles that sunk their cruiser and the majority of Storm Shadow missiles are still getting through
I don't know about US government but definitely western citizens underestimate Russia for no reason 😂😂😂😂
Because they have been brainwashed with heavy detergent that the west alliance beat the nazis , not the Russians.
If it wasn't for the Russians sacrifice , the whole world speaks German and eat sausage , GROSS !!
Russia is getting their ass whooped by little old Ukraine! Go Ukraine!
@@jinxxis4 😂😂😂 better say whole west not just Old Ukraine 🤣
@@jinxxis4 Ukraine's contribution to this war is its own male population, which is becoming less and less, the West provides everything else.
@@jinxxis4200 billion $ nato trained equipped from tanks to shells, jets, mercinaries to sat intel, 2nd largest army in europe vs 60 billion $ russia.😂 What a loser ukraine is
We have to ask the question that if the Russian army can detect and destroy Storm Shadow missiles with a small radar-reflecting surface, what chance of survival does an F-16 (manufactured in the 1980s and 90s) have, loaded with bombs?
no chance at all..even the f22s and f35s will fall from the sky of ukraine
None.
That's will be easy .
😆
Having worked on 16s years ago, their Sportscar Manuverabilty is their Greatest Attribute. But still, the Odds aren't Very Good.😉
People have said since the earth began rotating "No one can defeat our weapon" no such thing as invincable.
while you understanding it
zelensky as a comedian is not
hes still indulging in what joe told him
russia has only shovel and cant deal with the superior western weapons
"Nukes"
I think you've missed the most important thing: JAMMERS !
You broke through the entire talking of this VDO
Highly effective Russian electronic warfare systems ! 90% success rate in jamming and disabling cruise missiles and drones
Correct. There is more than one way of 'downing' a missile and Russia has jammers and 'deviators' which are cheaper to use than a single S-400.
Electronic warfare. 👌
The F35 relies on heaps of comms and GPS for situational awareness. With jammers that means they are a 1 trillion dollar fukup
Why are we (UK) so bloody arrogant as to think that it's only "WE" that can do anything better than anybody else???
i think its worse to think you cant do anything.
@@frodowiz Problem is arrogance always precedes a fall. We spend most of our lives convincing ourselves that "WE" are the greatest which is rarely ever true. It's never a good idea to believe your own bullshit.
@@liftrucstell that to the British government. It IS a good weapon, but it can be jammed...
Why do you think that? I don’t and every world cup etc proves to everyone that we can’t
@@adrianlane4256 What's the world cup got to do with it??? Yuri Gagarin was first man in space.
Underestimate Russia at your own peril
Ruzzia 😂🥩🔥
@@presidentofukraina this is the exact attitude OP is talking about right here.
@@TheBikeOnTheMoon 💥😱🤣
Napoleon, Hitler and now YOU. 🤡
Well. They certainly have not met my expectations so far. I thought it would take them maybe 2 weeks. 500+ days and now Ukraine has liberated more territory during this offensive than Russia took in the last year.
Never underestimate Russia's technological capability! It is beyond any other country!
Lol 😂 if you say so
Also Many more Storm shadow and Scalp NOT intercepted by russia, but how!!!
Russian hardware is junk. They are struggling with Ukraine lol. Ukraine didn’t even fortify for the invasion. In fact Russia is losing ground to Ukraine right in their own border too funny.
@@cap306 someone just lie?
@@youngmoneyvision9861big Russia by Italia
The “shot down” storm shadow is actually only slightly damaged. You don't see any bullet holes from a barrel weapon or impact holes from shrapnel - and a shot down with a large, long-range anti-aircraft missile would have left little of storm shadow. Maybe storm shadow wasn't shot down but crashed via electronic jamming.
The Russians were sold it by the Ukrainians.
an air defense missile isn’t a bullet lol
Any kind to its down , presents that Russia sees it.
It’s missing all the main components at the tip this also looks nothing like a storm shadow there’s no markings, stop lying
@@MenBehavingBadly. I know it's hard to swallow for you as an Ukrainian. I can feel your heart pain.
More than likely Russia is tracking the aircraft in the combat region and aiming additional radar onto the aircraft lock... This enables early track on the SS missile.
not true early warning radar can detect anything also how far and where it is coming from but can not track or target it then targeting radar actively for target on that area that's how Russia able to track cruise missile also where you from don't think your country doesn't sever you guys any propaganda
more likely Russians found on roof of the destroyed building
Storm Shadow travels at 0.95 Mach (729 mph) or (1,173 kph).
Considering you have to detect an explosive from an unknown direction traveling at almost 730 mph and be able to intercept it or else people will die, says a lot about modern technology.
Missiles don't stop wars, but wise men do.
In the land of the blind men,
the one eyed man is king.
Not so wise the man who stops the war - the wiser man don't even let it start
True, but the war has started.
Есть тысяча способов вытащить русского медведя из берлоги и нет ни одного способа загнать его обратно - сказал мудрый Бисмарк ...
Exactly
Nothing escapes the Tor-M2. That's why they call it the dome.
Apart from a Trident missle kid
@@binaryswinery5862 No bro, that's prehistoric shit from the 1970s. America can't get into quality rockets.
NASA flies into space on Russian jet engines.
Hypersonic missiles for combat use are missiles worthy of the 21st century, oh yes, for America with all its looted wealth, this is also an unattainable technology.
Minuteman missile I guess?
Tor can't even shoot down a drone it's terrible
For Russia TOR is enough to intercept Storm shadow,no need S300,S400,S500
great experience for russia in this war
Russia is going to emerge from this war 50 times smarter,,,wiser,,intelligenter,,,experiencer,,,richer,, powerfuller,,,stronger,,and more unified !!!
In other words,,this war is a Blessing to Russia !!! And it will continue to be a blessing to Russia for a hundred years !!
@@davidsmith5094 Putin might end up being a great Russian leader. He took over the Ukraine, defeated his opposition at the same time and has been modernizing it's military
@@davidsmith5094 and completely bankrupt with no army left. Wide open to being invaded by China...
All for the capture of a handful of small towns.
Storm Shadow is just a long range missile. It’s not stealth, hypersonic, or anything special.
It has a stealth type bode, so it is more challenging for older systems like original s-300.
It works, that's what matters .
@@billcook7483 hmm isn’t that the philosophy that NAFO clowns the Russians for?
It's fairly stealth but now that the Russians have one they can easily fine tune their systems to detect it. This is a major blow to the future of that missile. They also had new in the box himars rounds given to them and that's helped them jam those.
I guess for the British the storm shadow was a big deal.
The Russians also have newer S450, S500 and S550 air defense systems.
So
S50000000000
I would have thought that a downed Storm Shadow would have been more damaged than the one we can see in the film.
Russia should send London a few cruise missles and see if they get intercepted by the UK defense.
SLAVA RUSSIA FROM WROCLAW POLAND. KEEP DOING GOOD JOB.❤💪💪
Thanks Poland 👍🇬🇧
Dude!!! Your country is at the forefront, cheering Ukraine in its war against Russia.
If his country leadership is delusional he doesn't have to be😊@@sameerthakur720
Mirco wave detection, for so called stealth technology, has been around since 1993, used in Bosnia, during the war.
The problem is not detection, but locking....
"microwave detection"... It's called RADAR. And it's been around since WWII
It is not noise like the US, Finally I now know Russia has the best engineers in the world.
2022: western missiles are a game changer, russia doesn't have the technology to counter it.
2023: Russian EW truck in the forest is blocking our rockets!
Hypocrisy 😂
-TOWs will be a game changer
-155mm Artillerie will be a game changer
- HIMARS will be a game changer
- Bradley will be a game changer
- leopards will be a game changer
- stormshadow will be a game changer
- ...
@@ka3a4oek -F-16s will be a game changer
-F18s will be a gamer changer
`
and the list goes on..
also a side note, out of all the western provided heavy equipments, HIMARS is actually a proper game changer, because it gave ukrainians the ability to perfom counter battery warefare at distance, while with high accuracy
Avoid marijuana...
it's too early to say it was shot down. Russian spokesperson lies everyday 😂
No weapon has a 100% success rate
Kh-47M2 Kinzhal 👍👍
Idk. Hydrogen bombs have a 100% success rate
100% вообще ничего нет 😂
Таким способом можно оправдывать всё,что угодно,но факт останется фактом)
True this missile just failed it wasn't shot down
40 years ago I worked on a missile system that shot down a 4.5” shell for storm shadow it’s back to the drawing board for mods
Fr?
And that’s prove that in papers all weapon looks unstoppable, but in real combat things change radically
That is very very true for allot of things, in paper in theory everything is perfect but in practice things get even more nonlinear, disturbances, noises and system limitations and many more stuff limits the capabilities.
Interestingly The Russian scientists were the founder of nonlinear system control, the Lyapunov theory by M.Lyapunov at 1918, the Sliding mode control yet by another Russian scientist but due to lack of fast switches this technic was not popular enough and only became allot popular in recent years.
So it is not by accident that Russian are good at missile technology, they were the founders of nonlinear system controls, especially the very very strong theory of Lyapunov which is worldwide used in many many application both by Europe and US!
I study control engineering , even in Germany we still study these Russian invented great methods.
The photos don't seem to show shrapnel suggesting that they simply spoofed the GPS causing the missile to crash land.
Russian headquarters in Crimea can say that the S400 worked pretty well... 😂😂😂
submarine and Novocherkassk agree
Only thing that missile has going for it is the low level flight, luckily for the user the combat area is mostly flat. Otherwise it is a smallish and quite a slow target, easily to be intercepted even with the 60s tech. The carriers are flying very low as well, just for the minimum necessary amount of time usually with another cover plane. Due to that the range is much lower but still enough for current deployment. Bit expensive to use as you might loose up to 2 planes to fire 1 missile. Also I would wonder if Ukraine try to saturate the defences with other missiles and drones during the deployment same as they usually do when using Himars.
Украина и насытить несовместимые слова!Иначе не бегал бы Зелибобик по Европам с протянутой рукой😂
It's really sad but this shows that ukarine is just a test object for europe
Like always we occidental understimate Russia and this is a fatal error.
I have never heard any argument underestimating Russian capabilities, so I don't understand your claim that we _"occidental understimate_ Russia".
But I have heard lots of arguments overestimating Russian capabilities. Hence, why at the start of the Russo-Ukrainian War last year in February, it was widely predicted Russia would easily overrun the entirety the country of Ukraine by the end of March 2022. Russia flopped badly, it was so bad that the first couple of month, Russia was the main supplier of armored vehicles & weapons to Ukraine. It would be laughable if it wasn't so tragic.
Russian weapons are good, there was never any doubt about that. The US & NATO received samples from the war collected by Ukraine to confirm it. The problem is the troop training of the Russian troops. And Putin underestimated the Ukraine's army to the detriment of his troops, that's why he's going to have two years unable to complete his 'special operation& is denied any form of victory. Putin's fatal error to have badly underestimated the Ukraine army.
Hence, why Putin has ordered his generals to punish directly the Ukraine population.
@@OverlordShamala Dear friend my opinion is that all armies are overstimate included U.S. army, we are speaking about weapon, the Russia tehnology is always considered understimate but when I see at many type of weapon used in Ucraina I keep my mouth open. At the beginning also Russia understimated AFU but has learned from this error and unfortunately due at this weapon will wiped out Ucraina. Isn't an honor for we occidental this situation, we had to insist on peace talks but our government think only at Russia defeat without think at consequences a lot of casualities and an entire country to rebuild.
@@OverlordShamalamy friend Russia could have finished the war in few days if it wasn't for Nato countries 66 in numbers started giving weapons Worth of billions to Ukraine so that Ukraine can win the war but Ukraine failed to win the war despite being given billion of dollars worth of weapons.
Secondly if it was American against 66 countries American could have fallen by now. Remember what happened in Vietnam USA lost hundred of thousands of soldiers. In Iraq USA had to call for help from Britain and Australia to help defeat Iraq own its own was going to fail. It's only Russia that can manage to contain 66 countries at a go. Russia is the most powerful country on earth as of now.
@@MrFairness1 Dear friend, this is the first time I've heard that we "always considered _understiate_ Russian technology. And it's coming from you. Maybe you are talking about the Russian surface navy, which is not to par with western standards, that may be true. Considering their only aircraft carrier have experience mechanical failure. But it's submarine force is a whole different thing.
Or is it the Russian T-75, which is not up to standard with modern tanks. But the T75 is still a formidable tank, but I think you are talking about the T-14 Armata, which has failed to live up to its mission.
Russia will not wipe out Ukraine, this will be a long protectorate war. Putin made it clear, it wants the whole of Ukrainian country, Ukraine want to exist as a sovereign nation. How do negotiate that. What middle ground can you find.
But your claim that Russia will wipe out Ukraine, are you inferring Russia will use nuclear weapons? That will show to the world Russia cannot win in a conventional war, & against a much smaller country. It need its nukes to do so. But that will bring a response from the US, if Russia get used to in using nuclear weapons to get its way, it may use them against Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, & Estonia. Which Putin made it very clear it wants to conquer.
@@lenziechundu3292 my friend, (another one calling me friend?) I have been hearing that Russian propaganda since it invaded Ukraine that it would finish that war in a few days. He failed to do so in February 2022. Now one believes in that propaganda anymore. Maybe the GOP fascist in our country do.
The US & NATO did not began sending weapons to Ukraine until it proved it will continue existing as a sovereign country. By early may, that's when Ukraine got the tow missiles & the M142 HIMARS. And the supply are limited. But Ukriane will soon be supplied with F-16s & American Abrams tanks. Ukraine air force is very small but have given the Russian a very hard time, lets see what they will do with the F-16s.
Umm... Ukraine is not fighting to win the war. Who told you that fib? Ukraine is fighting to exist as a sovereign country free from Russia. Ukraine has lost some territory in the East but has recovered Kharkiv & Kherson, don't know if Ukraine will be able to recover Crimea. They might be able to recover Mariupol but that will be it.
The US lost about 55,000 soldiers in wounded in action & killed in action, not hundreds of thousands. The US formed the spearhead of the Iraq invasion, the British soldiers were to cover the flanks, Australia only sent a very small contingency, wasn't big. The US doesn't have a large army as it used to in the Cold War.
Russia is not the most powerful country on Earth, the small country of Ukraine has shown that for the world to see. Russia is not containing 66 countries, it's having a very hard time winning a war against a small country 20 times smaller.
Russia is only powerful because of it's nuclear weapons. Without them, it's nothing. And today, Russia is under the shadow of China.
Well done Russia!
Go Russia!
Greetings from the Netherlands.
Wait until they attack your country....😂😂😂😂😂
Halland wouldn’t last 5 minutes on it own
@@Asparagus777-hw5ft At least learn to spell the name of the country that you refer to🖕
US fights with Afghans will also be analyzed by skeptical approach, duh!!!
You said it, " As expected , specific information about individual incidents of russian forces intercepting storm shadow missiles remains undisclosed " how about .. every other way they have to shoot down any other missile " Destroy a Leopard we are the BEST ARMY IN THE WORLD , destroy a Stormshadow yet DONT ASK ANY QUESTIONS BECAUSE WE JUST DO IT ... great videos and information man. I always keep watching! I can see both sides of the war watching these video's . makes me question alot of " 1 " sided info
Ghost of kiev took down every Russian jet, snake island they all fought brave and died, counteroffensive? Hasn’t started, the patriot system destroyed a hypersonic missile, British news and American news are all full of it I trust the Russians over my own country USA and Russophobia British news anyday
I don't understand what you want so are you for Russia or for the West, please clarify.
Used to be
Us get out of Ukrainian that's bidens money laundering home why we are there
this video is so hilarious, at 0:23 they show some footage of a missile with locked on thermals.... yet the video is cut from a longer video where you see the system completely fail to intercept it...
Why do a lot of people believe that missiles or any weapon system for that matter is incapable of being countered or intercepted. It's just like those hypersonic anti-aircraft carrier missiles which haven't sunk or even hit an aircraft carrier. Sheesh.
Hey Britian! Thanks for the target practice!
Hey Russia thanks for the target practice 😂 the majority of Storm Shadow are still getting through
@@Stephen-bq4nqRussia is able to take that British shit down.
@@julioalbertoherrera1339 yeah that's why their ammunition dumps keep blowing up 🤡
These are older weapons. Up dated version are available with greater distance.
Could be that British-made cruise missile is too fat and gives away more heat signatures.
I'd say it's probably the fact that western weapons have a built in fault. They're wonder weapons that are indestructible and can't be matched on the battlefield. Of coarse this is complete bullshit but this kind of hubris causes governments, researchers, and producers to sit on their asses and believe their own bullshit. ThIs is the worst fault a weapons system can have. If I were an F35 pilot, I'd be very nervous as to how well these wonder innovations work seeing how the, for maximum profit, defense industry may fudge a number here or there to get the lucrative contracts. Of coarse the defense department won't say anything as they're all on the payroll.
Most of them are still hitting their targets
Fat-shaming a cruise missile? Not good, not good...
@@Stephen-bq4nq Only if targets do not have air defense.
@@Readyforsomexin the Russians don't think they should have air defence at their ammunition dumps when they know the Ukrainian are targetting them 🤦
The British almost got beat up by Argentina, Russia is in a different league
What? A British fleet sailed half way around the world and kicked the crap out of Argentina. To a point where they won't even dare going near the Falklands again even now.
By the video evidence above in topic non explosive warhead was used. Kinteic energy warhead was used to give details of constuction.
A cruisemissle is a small subsonic airplane. How hard can it be?
Well done Russia.
Settle down Ivan. Russia is on defense, this was supposed to be a month long offence with Ukraine surrendered. How is that going for you?
@@dircon75 lol are u mad?
@@Readyforsomexin No but you are. I am laughing russia = PAPER TIGER. The whole world know now Russia is alot of talk!
@@dircon75 nah, i am not gonna wastle my time on random internet troll... whatever u think body, whatever u think lol
@@Readyforsomexin But you did waste your time. Plus learn how to spell what are you 7 years old? Ask your mommy to help you.
I understand it is terrain following. If that means under the enemy radar then it cannot be intercepted by regular SAM's surely ? It might have been hit by a MANPAD, hit a ground object in error or simply malfunctioned even jammed. We only see part of the missile. I read they have a 97% success rate, so possibly faulty. As others have suggested.
it is hard to be tracked by radar, but not impossible. i don't think a manpad or it's user would be able to detect and track a missile yet alone intercept it. if it just crashed it would have exploded
The GPS/GLONASS signal could be altered to set a false altitude, etc.
You can't handle the truth.
@@KermitFrazierdotcom The truth, pursuit of is why I posed the question.
Transmitting coordinates would provide a signal for homing defenses and hardly stealthy.
Many are arguing how this Storm Shadow was shot down. It is also possible that it just failed on its own and crashed.
This channel touts over the horizon radar. Low freq radar may detect a stealthy object from quite a distance, and it can provide a heads up! alert, but hardly good for targeting.
The Storm Shadow shown here was in Zap Oblast which implies the plane carrying it was likely easy to detect. The plane was probably flying towards the intended final target even though the target may have been 150 km distant, so it would be easy to alert those along the presumed flight path. Few Storm Shadow targets have been in Zap Oblast, so the missile may have still been descending from its launch, still much above tree top level and a much easier target.
That sounds very likely to me especially after having lived in the UK
for several years. Never buy a UK built car like Triumph because they
can't be relied on.
The only system really that would have a good chance of knocking out a storm shadow would be the The Pantsir. when the missile is at low attitude
Russia is not a 3rd world country
Tomahawk i bet are the only affordable munitions to use instead of some DARPA project
Military's biggest blunders;
Intercepted among its sophisticated weaponry equipments onto the extended studies of exact trajectory and exact countermeasures
excellent report
Well intercept Us hypersonic missiles as well
The US is far behind Russia when it comes to
hypersonic missiles development and I hope
that we see a demonstration of that fact sooner
rather than later. The US is like a 3 year old and
doesn't yet know how to play well with others
and sadly it will take the destruction of much
of the US before the populace wakes up and
demands change from it's elite who profit from
never ending wars around the world.
Now the manufacturer of these storm shadow missiles will definitely enhance it for speed and possible a guidance system that turns on before impact. Russia sees it by the missile electronic signature otherwise it could be a flying object.
🤣
You are missing the point.
Russia captures the missile in flight & you are wasting time name calling & scratching yourself.
Funny how you show a picture of the defunct Duga radar array ( now an Urbexer playground)
Krasuka + s400 is best combo
🇷🇺🏆🇷🇺 Victory and glory to Russia 🇷🇺🏆🇷🇺 Long live President Putin ❤ from Türkiye 🇹🇷💪🏻🇷🇺
Cruise missiles are actually not that fast. It is a shoot and forget missile so it just glides to the designated target
Many cruise missile are supersonic.
@@whoknows-ee5kq Nope....Brahmos is the only supersonic cruise missile as to date....and only India has it....
@@hetasaputra4598but it cannot fly
Most fly at quite low altitude to try and hide from radar. Supersonic things tend to be more obvious and can't manouver as easily
IRST. Infrared Search and Track system in conjunction with radar. Exhaust is always a giveaway. The more sensitive the system, the better for finding aircraft and missiles. Once they realize that miniscule blip isn't a bird, ....
NATO think Russia is iraq or Afghanistan 😂😂
If you think NATO is this stupid then you are naive
@@intelcom4964 nato is Similar to men
Easy, by using shovels😅
Shovels pick up dirt and throw it up at Shadow missiles which go blind and whisk down , boom , target missed .
@@mnoorbhai big brain time
"Theoretically"...that's where all seriousness ends.
Not at all. Even the US has admitted that HiMars is not all that effective because Russia is tampering with their GPS.
0:23 wtf, this is footage of a pantsir failing to intercept a storm shadow!!!
Those "experts" from NATO probably said something like
"BUT BUT IT WORK GOOD AGAIN FARMES, SCHOOL AND HOSPITALS"
Лучшее ПВО на планете это В России . Этот статус мы получили с конца 60х и несëм его по сей день🤘🇷🇺🤘
you putinskiy xuecoc, whats happened to submarine and Novocherkassk?
Adolf Hitler underestimated Russia and he never lived to tell the story
Because with intact air defenses, a few get hit, sometimes.
Look if Russia have hypersonic missiles they will try to have a very advance air defensive system that would be cater to detect high speed as well.
I believe the Russians have the best defensive system in the world
When they face an enemy with a fully functional Airforce then we will find out how good their defensive systems are
And we will also find out how good the "fully functional Airforce" is as well. I got my money on the Russians.
Mabe the Russians don't fire their radar and missile engineers when they point out errors in their systems as the US DOD firms do!!
American air defence ineffective against Russian missile
Thats not true. Kinshals were shot down by Patriot missiles.
@@liketohike1589 can you show pictures?
@@liketohike1589 Ukrainians said that they have nothing to shoot down Onyx. (mach 3) Therefore =No kindzal was shot down. That was one of countless lies that BBC and such keeps feeding the public. That video where dumb Klitschko presenting "kinzal" ...I could not hold in my chair. It looked like he sculpted it by himself. Not even shape or size were anything like kindzal. Automatically, all media and papers run with it, multiplying it in million articles and videos, "news".. It a sad joke. There is a reason why Goebbels picked BBC as his model for propaganda.
@@liketohike1589 2: If you saw the video of that action (one who filmed it is in prison now) then you could see that Patriot went haywire. It mean that Russians sent a few decoy missiles first (to locate Patriot) and then, only then shot Kidzal (which hit Patriot). That Klitschko sculpted joke for western public consumption ..c'mon
@liketohike1589
The news you watching on TV isn't kinzal it fab 500 misile from soviet era🤣
What everyone has to remember that storm shadow are more stealthy than F-35 or F-22
French Rafale also has this and India has bought these ,with other weapons package which ll go in the hard points of Rafale ,for ground attack.
It's a joined British french project. Only that as always Britain alone claimed the fame 😂
@@dragonlord1225 Hmm could be.I think the French market it as Scaalp and Brits do that in the name of Stormshadow.I think they have a partnership model from the Jaguar Fighter days which until recently Indian Airforce was using for Ground attack roles along with Mirage 2000s.
Damn cleaver those Russians, now they've just gotta find a solution to tackle the drones and it's a done deal.
In many ways, tech on both sides has to some degree cancelled each other out leaving the soldier to battle it out in something akin to the two previous world wars, raiding each other's trenches with bayonets fixed. I write about these things flippantly, but clearly war is hell and in the end there are few winners.
They haven't worked out how to stop HIMARS or Storm Shadow the bulk of the missiles are still getting through
@@Stephen-bq4nq I think you're right, but the video seems to suggest that they are turning their minds to resolving this issue while on the other side, the Ukrainians have the best minds in the West ponding their problems too. Putin isn't the kind of guy you want to invite around for tea and biscuits, but seeing what the West is promoting I personally hope Putin can stop the eastward march of their Rainbow emblems marching east with everything they represent.
@@Stephen-bq4nqХимарсы сложно перехватывать, это правда. Но Storm Shadow попадают только там, где есть "окна" систем ПВО. Как уже сказали, крылатые ракеты для современных систем не проблема.
В данном случае особенность что она упала довольно целой и можно заглянуть внутрь 🤭. Обычно шрапнелью и взрывом их распыляет
@@Stephen-bq4nqMissiles are going through only if AAs are overwhelmed, and even though, Ukrainians still need to find the least protected zones, as a layered defence system dont let a single come through if even tens of them are launched simultaneously
@@dr-weeb yeah the point is they're still going through.
Slava Russia keep it up A Buk should intercept a Us cruise missie attack very well
SLAVA URINI !!!
Exactly that missile travel very slow
The Russian military also claimed the Moscva was sunk because of an on board fire.
Мне всегда смешно как на Западе сочиняют мифи про исключительность себя, своих технологий, своего оружия и сами же в это верят, но потом удивляются, что это лишь миф. В чём проблема сбить цель, летящую на дозвуковой скорости? Да вообще легко. Технологиях Stealth не означает незаметность, это лишь малозаметность и незаметны такие цели только на достаточно больших расстояниях, но если цель летит очень низко, то это не важно - её скрывает горизонт и только поэтому Storm Shadow/SCALP могут обойти российскую ПВО. Не возможно везде поставить ПВО и полностью закрыть тысячи километров линии фронта и границ. Радары ПВО излучают и по излучению можно их обнаружить и проложить маршрут ракет/самолётов там, где нет ПВО - это единственная возможность не быть сбитым российской ПВО. Всё остальное - мифы пропаганды.
у них щас новый миф про инопланетное оружие сделанное из космического корабля в виде светящегося треугольника....
Cant wait for intercrpting tomahawk cruise missiles as well
Radar jamming from Russians are effective against incoming missile
looks like it was hijacked electronically then taken over to run it out of fuel then it just falls to the ground.
I was stationed in the Middle East when we (incl. the Brits) were firing cruise missiles towards Iraq and Afghanistan, the success rate was 85% even with the nonexistent missile defense in the region. Nothing new here. If it were shot down or intercepted by the Russians, it wouldn’t shock me as the Russians do have a missile defense system. I have a feeling that the Chinese might have intervened on this one though…
Thank you. Why people think this missile or even f22 is invincible is beyond me how stupid can you be? It's all about rate of successful hits it is never 100%
Sounds like your afraid of the chinese 😅
@@angelrodriguez6479sounds like you are naive to the going ons of the world
@cosac88 I'm tuned in on what's going on. It's called researching .. but please tell me ... what's going on in the world, in your opinion??
@@cosac88, почему вы боитесь китайцев? Бойтесь США и НАТО. Китай, в отличии от США и НАТО ни на кого не нападал за последние 100 лет, и уж точно ни на кого на соседнем континенте, в десятках тыс км от своих границ
Kudos Russians. Bring on F16. The brains in your military is on onother level. Probably they mistook Russia with Libya!
Yeah the special military operation has been such a success😂😂🤡
@@Stephen-bq4nqyeap. Total success Zelensky has your money. Send more
Ground hugging cruse missiles can be seen by satellite/airborne radar on clear days. Ground based radars, rockets and good A.I. trigonometry complete the job. Noticed there were no burn marks on the pictures. Raises the question of hacked electronic guidance systems. Whatever, I for one do not take the Russians to necessarily lose all.
Russian Air Defence Equipment can easily intercept any subsonic cruise missile. SAM 13s have photocontrast engagement , Even older SAM 8s have TV tracking engagements and can function on Amplitude mode for small/ regressed target signatures. Their lack of success probably is due to lower than Soviet Era training standards of short term specialist equipment crew.
Интересный репортаж . Зашел посмотреть британские новости после их публикаций о том , что украинскому наступлению мешают кусты .
Аналитика как всегда на уровне 10 из 10
Russia is gaining huge experience in this war plus picking up massive western technology from everything they captured. It just shows they are not the easy target politicians and media seem to be claiming.
To get an answer on how, start here @05:20
Thanks man
Russian air defense is the best in the world though no defense system is 100% perfect.
Previously, they had been using army general to intercept Storm Shadow. That too was 100% successful.
From a technology perspective Russia is decades ahead of the west. And this huge advantage will only get bigger in the coming years.
in short: the video provides no answer at all
Western weapons become paper tigers when faced with Russia tech
And yet no niger live in Russia😅
😂
west make a lot of propaganda videos about their weapons.They say their weapons are the most advanced and modern.then they sell it at a very high price, when the weapon is used for war,it turns out that the weapon has many weaknesses hahaha
Prolly why Ukraine lost Kyiv already... oh wait, no that was Kherson.... wait, no, that was Karkhiv.... wait, shit, where are we now?
@@Matteo7217 When the failure of Ukraine in the great "counter-offensive" is also visible from Saturn/Jupiter/Neptune/Pluto ;), the rumors begin to spread that Russia has not taken Kiev! :))) Funny, if it didn't show the Western thinking that can't recognize when it's losing badly! ;) Russia never said it would take Kiev, it didn't want to do that but only to put pressure for a peace treaty, and the withdrawal from Kiev was due to the farce, common among Westerners, by which Ukr signed a peace treaty and then refused to implement it! if you still want to talk about "victories", how about we look at the USA/NATO which fought small countries and ran away from there! :))) You tell him how it is with the US "victory" in Afghanistan! :)))) Then move on to Syria, Libya, and others :))🤣🤣🤣
I’d like to see definitive proof of this. Although no weapon has a 100% success rate, but I suspect this was a fluke on the part of the Russians. If not, then being intercepted will help our engineers refine it and replacement weapon capabilities.
Stormshadow appears to have been very successful against key Russian targets. 🤷🏻♂️
The head of the Kherson region, Vladimir Saldo, has legged it to Crimea. Looks like he realised he's on the list for a Storm Shadow strike as soon as his location is confirmed
Not as of recently. Most are being shot down over Crimea.
@@starstray4326
The Ukrainians hit a dockyard in Crimea just yesterday-at least 2 Stormshaddow got through 🤷🏻♂️
@@newblackdog7827 I think forgot to read when I said most not all
The Russians must have shared the info on Storm Shadow with China as US had a similar missile, the AGM-158.
You say something, and its contrary or opposite at the same time.
Russia cannot intercept the shadow missile and at the same time Russia has sophicated system to intercept HIMARS and a shadow missile in Syria. Then we see Russians technicians dismantling a shadow missile.
Good Russia.
NATO demiltarization goes according to the plan😂😂😂
your observation is well taken. It is the truth.
It's Russia that's getting demilitarized it will take them decades to recover from their equipment losses
nothing is completely impossible to hit whilst in flight and most impacts are due to pellets from the shot-gun type spread from an exploding counter munition - Russia knows where its important places around battlefield are, so seeing anything at a specific range of a known enemy weapon, especially the delivery platform changing direction at height is a dead give away something is coming - these delivery platforms are carrying very heavy weapons and no really going to do anything else other than fly back to base - not dissing the Ukrainian a/f, but NATO pilots are trained not to be obvisous in any delivery - storm-shadow will not be effected by electronic jamming - once fired it does not talk or take further commands - its GPS is harderned and not is only means of nav - it flys low using something akin to TRNS with alittle more added - it is not designed to adapt to anything new in its known surroundings - so if something new was there (a mast, stretched wires, etc) it will hit them if within its flight path as it was not told about them - this is only because such features are not known prior to platform launch
it is worth mentioning, the Storm-shadow is more than just the missile, alot more
the russian OTH is good at range for large high RCS rated detected platforms - so small RCS are going to sale through until more local pick them up - OTH is not a precision method for detecting, more of an indication - back-clutter can make it a nightmare for false-positives, but time helps them get better results - a change in a known picture
it all comes down to Russian intel / sig-int watching and with what they think their enemy is going to do given a region and then adapting to that info - when your enemy only has a few launching platforms, its a little easier than if they had 100's flying at any one time - plus if you put your people in or around an enemy air-base covertly, they will see platforms taking off and see their ordance under wing
4:26 This man who totally exists said something. LMAO.
29 in Russian math = maybe 3 to 4 in earthly mathematics.
in your dreams