Sony A6300 vs RX100IV
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
- Get your Sony A6300 from amazon through the link below:
amzn.to/1pj5PKi
or
Get your Sony RX100IV from amazon through the link below:
amzn.to/1GYWiJR
Here is my comparison of the Sony A6300 and RX100IV. Enjoy!
-TDD
![[DOKKAN BATTLE] Worldwide Campaign Announcement Video Part 2!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JpT5Voak6WA/mqdefault.jpg)
Great Video! Always enjoy the extra information. I purchased an RX100m3 when it first released while my buddy went with the a6000. We use them mostly for video. My RX100m3 performed better than his at first with the Zeiss lense and xavc-s codec. After the a6000 update and a few prime lenses later, my buddies a6000 started to outperform my camera. I'm still happy with my RX100m3 since it is much smaller. I find myself carrying it with me almost everywhere I go, either in my jacket pocket or backpack. My buddy always has to "prepare" to bring his camera because he needs to decide which lenses to bring and deal with transporting multiple parts. The a6000 a bit bigger, but after adding on some nice glass, that becomes a significantly bigger camera and something you just won't "whip out". The front facing screen on the RX100m3 is just amazing for vlog style video which is mainly what I do as well. The combination of convenience, quality, and flipable screen makes for an incredible package with the RX. I'm planning on picking up the a6300, but i'll see what the GH5 has to offer first!
And which gear did your journey eventually end up with?
FYI - The A6300 does overheat. Something to consider if you plan on doing long duration videos.
Carlos Rivera Yup. Sure does.
After how long?
Overheating issue has been fixed to a large extent with new firmware (V1.10). You can shoot 4k for upto 30 minute sessions now.
Carlos Rivera Does it overheat recording at 1080?
I use it for weddings. It does over heat but only when it’s real hot outside or i leave it on consistently
One minor aspect you may have overlooked is that the RX100IV has much better HFR capabilities. It is able to take up to 1000fps (at a lower resolution) vs 120fps. Take note of that if it is your priority function.
isthatabear yes this is why im getting mark v!
For those in Australia, these do not compare in price. RX100IV is about $1,200 shipped, A6300 is $1,600 shipped + you need glass. Was leaning towards a A6300 but all these reviews have me thinking it's too expensive unless you will be doing video a lot (then get a video camera?) and eventually the price will reduce. Which makes, for a pocket camera priority, the RX100IV a great choice....I think so far.
Very informative video. Throwing my two cents in on why I decided to go RX100; I'm coming from an entry level M4/3 background with adapted vintage glass, played around with a 6D with a very nice modern standard zoom the other day and decided it was most definitely time to get a better camera. I don't do too much freelance work, so I'm betting that the RX100 will be the swiss army knife for my needs , and I'll just grab an A7 or 5D on the rent on the rare opportunity to do something special. 4K video allows me to downscale to 1080 for 4:4:4, high speed capability is very nice, alongside other pros of both systems. I do understand that I throw away interchangeable lenses, uninterrupted 4K, some low light, a better EVF, faster AF, mic slot, and a hotshoe, but I figure that I will be able to at least make do with optical sync'd flash and post-audio sync (which I'm used to by now on the entry 4/3 system). For those that have the future budget for lenses, def go A6300 though. I will keep watching and reading on optics though hehe, see where I go in the future :D
I have both cameras. They are both excellent, although I would say that Sony's kit lens is leagues behind the rx100 series Zeiss glass. An equivalent lens for the 6300 runs near 1000 dollars and increases the size and weight significantly. I find myself using the RX100 a lot more because of it's compact size and I cringe carrying around my savings account through the forest. The best camera is the one that you have with you. If you're looking for professional quality, and making large prints then the 6300 all day. But if you just want killer Instagram and RUclips content, the RX100 iv is plenty imo.
Good video! Will we see a Sony A6300 vs Sony RX10 Mk II comparison?
Bruh you do the best comparisons!! I go to your videos for the exact camera comparisons!! Thank you!!
You say over and over that the A6300 does NOT overheat, yet I've heard the opposite from people who have used the A6300 to shoot 4k video. Apparently, they BOTH overheat.
+John Robie firmware update has resolved the a6300 issues
+TheDigitalDigest which one in your opinion would be better for shooting video , slo mo and regular as well as burst shots for sports action when you are at a distance from the game?
Really? Sold! I'm going to get it if it fixed the overheating.
a6300 and a6500 both overheat... depending on ambient conditions and how long you're recording for...
TCSTV have concluded that it's also down to quality control as various models overheated at different times...
I have the A6300. It does overheat when you shoot continuous 4K video and I have the latest firmware etc. Having read around the issue, the issue seems to be the Bionz X processor when under maximum load and there not being sufficient cooling. The solutions I've seen online are people building cages around the camera to dissipate heat but that's not feasible for the way that I use the camera.
So is the RX 100 IV is superior until you spend twice as much on an a6300 with a Zeiss lens?
Yep. Even if a user can afford lens, there isn't much to choose from to do for 24-70. And if there was, that's doubling the size. Misses the whole point of being small and light weight. Whoever uses the interchangeable system will definitely need a larger bag to make it useful.
I just sold my A6300 to soon buy the RX100 V due to this exact reason, you need to sink a fortune into the camera and its lenses to get the best pictures. And going off what Mr. Nguyen said, using any lens but the 'okay' pancake kit lens doubles (or triples) the size of the camera to where you're basically holding a mirrorless DLSR. There's no mid range lenses, either you spend a fortune for very good glass or you spend a few hundred on 'good enough' glass. There's a limited selection of lenses available. My Nikon DSLR has all the lenses I could need, but I couldn't find many quality lenses that cost more than the A6300 itself.
AudioAftershock you hit the nail on the spot!!! The lack of decent lenses for the 6300-6500 forces you to buy super expensive lenses over 2k is just insane. This smaller camera with the 1.8 aperture makes it so much more appealing.
I thought watching this video would help me pick between the two but now I feel completely torn haha
He says the A6300 is superior to the other one in each and every way.
Since when is Charlie Sheen reviewing cameras ?
Excellent presentation, well explained and to the point, Thank you!
This was one of the best pieces of RUclips content, let alone review, ever. Succinct, informative and clear. Thank you :)
It be awesome if you can show us photos with kit lens vs each other...
Can you make an RX10ii vs a6300 comparison please, especially on video? It would really help me a lot on deciding. Any thoughts on a6300's slowmo capabilities?
Sir i only have budget to buy either rx100 v or a6300 with kit lens only because purchasing lens adds another $600-700 thats beyond my budget. So kindly suggest which one is better. Do a comparison video for that including sample pictures and video. Rx100 v is having good lens and flip up screen but smaller sensor i doubt does it makes good shallow depth of field. How much is creates bokeh? And how it perform in low light... i am not professional but i want a good camera because i am not happy with smartphone cameras creativity. I want to be creative in casual pics. Both of these cameras are at far more expensive for me so i want to make a happy purchase. None of them is available in local stores to try and comes on order so kindly please suggest which is good rx100v or a6300 with kit lens?
Tejvir Singh search "a6500 with kit lens vs rx100"
I've been looking to get a Sony camera for video taking and taking pictures... I've been looking at the Sony RX10 M2 and now this one the Sony A6300... I guess those may be a better comparison than the RX100 series.
Not easy to choose which one.
RX100 IV to me used to overheat only underwater in fact, probably because of the watertight case that does not allow to ventilate properly.
Nice comparison. Does anyone know the JPEG and RAW FPS for these two cameras?
The A6300 does overheat. Even while only taking pictures. Probably not in the wintertime, though.
only problem with the RX100 when you put it in the pocket, I have noticed that your pants will ruin the screen. You better apply a protective film from the beginning!
Thank you so much. I am debating between these two and you are a life saver.
thanks for watching
You didn't mention if the A6300 has image stabilization. I'm looking for a travel camera that allows me to do fine underwater video in a casing. I did this with the RX100 (the first one) and it worked out pretty well.
I don't know if you're interested in lumix zs100 , but I am actually confused between the rx100 IV ans zs100. if you can compare both camers , that will be helpful and informative too. I think zs100 has a potential.
all camera get overheat even my D800. how much more in mirrorless camera. Jason Lanier mention about this overheating. he has a good reason about this.
If I was diving in the Cook Island would you go with the R100V or the A6300?
I've had the RX100 IV for about six months and I'm considering getting the A6300. You mentioned 4K video looking better in the A6300. As someone reluctant to shoot at 24fps I wondered about the 4K quality on the A6300 at 30fps with bixel binning (e.g. not the 'Super 35' 24p mode without pixel binning) versus the RX100 IV at 30fps. Does the A6300 still outshine the RX100 IV at 4K image quality at 30fps?
Travelling around the US for a month, next month. Which do I choose??
Just got the m2 for a absolute bargain of a 100 pound, How does it compare to the m3
I have a question about the a6300. When recording at 1080p at 60fps, does the frame rate drop to 30fps in low light?
hello @TheDigitalDigest !!
if I record video only in 1080p 120FPS so , is there any cap issue ? or overheating in a6300 ? will you able to help me in this ?
i thought you can charge the RX100 iv from a battery pack? well ive tried on mine and it works
Wheres the video they shoot? Does RX100 crop in 4k? The a6300 at 30p does? Most of what I want to know comes from using them.
super helpful - thank you
Thanks for comparing these. Between RX100 M4 and Sony A6000, which would you prefer for taking stills?
Harish Chouhan a6000 series are definitely better for stills (and video for that matter)
Thanks mate. I did buy A6000 with a single kit lens. Now searching for other lenses under $400 that would be good for landscape & video while travelling.
Glad you've chosen a6000 - you can't go wrong with it. I used to have a6000 and really liked its low light performance, image quality and a relatively compact size.
If you are looking for other lenses did you consider vintage manual lenses that can be adapted for E-mount? It's a good and affordable alternative to native lenses. Adds versatility to your digital camera.
Check also other videos about E-mount lenses on this awesome channel (which I love! thanks TheDigitalDiagest for doing all these great reviews). It might help you to make a decision on your next lens.
Wow thanks a lot again :). I am looking for lenses and would love to have manual lenses but I'm currently in Thailand and not sure where to find them. I'm following the channel you suggested. I had checked few of the lenses he suggested but was not able to find them in India.
Wonder how long can the battery last if im shooting 1080p on vid for the RX100 Iv?
and does it overheat when recording/shootin in 1080p?
Greatly informative; thank you
A6300 is an overheating machine..
Greg Profitt
My Sony Xperia Z3 overheats aswell when shooting photos in summer. So I would even push it further and say: Sony 's main competence is H-E-A-T, not photography...
the question is which cam is less visleble to stalk your neighbours
Does the Sony still overheat with the latest firmware?
can rx100iv do manual focus and axposure when recording video? I can't find it anywhere
In your opinion... Whats the best camera choice to buy (up to 1.2k)? I am from brazil and i am going to usa... I would like to buy a camera that take great pictures at night.
You need to be more specific. What is the camera for? Street photo? Portraits? Video vs still? Are you travel a lot ? Etc etc
thanks for the awesome video.
i have one question though: does the a6300 have digital images stabilization for video shooting?
Husam Hourani No. You'll have to buy the a6500 for that.
Nice comparison! There is one major drawback of 6300, the 1080p is much worse than RX100IV. Even RX100III's 1080p is better than 6300.
+Fan Ye what do you mean? and how would you know that?
+Jakob Baalmann Although my 6300 haven't been arrived, according to all the review I read, 6300 has basically the same 1080p quality as 6000. And you can compare the 1080p quality of 6000 and other cameras via dpreview.
+Fan Ye 🤔
3.5 means it’s out for me with other options.
the RX100IV doesn't have a simple and low tech mic input... a camera for video with crappy audio... I wonder, who will buy this camera? Even my old laptop has a mic input.. why do brands like Sony insist on annoying their custumers...
Does sony a6300 4k and 1080p 120fps has a crop! thanks
I will buy A6300 if the screen is fully articulated. This is a deal breaker for vloggers. Even A6500 is not. I would rather not have the EVF than not have the selfie screen.
Sir prize
Is the RX100IV limited to 5 minutes 4K total or is it 5 minutes, let the camera cool down, another 5 minutes? I usually film short little 30 second clips in 4K for school and put them together but if I can only get 10, 30 second clips I'd be a little disappointed...
You get 5 minutes of 4k footage, then stop recording, then start recording another 5min right after, and so on. I have the RX100 IV, and I also only usually film multiple short clips. Hitting 3mins for me is very rare so the rx100iv is way more than enough for my needs :) I've had it for a year now and it has never overheated even when I did try to film the max 5min.
Mons cool thank you so much. I was psyched to find this camera. Would you over all recommend it?
Definitely recommend it! :) The capabilities and features of this little camera is just outstanding, especially compared to other point and shoots in the market. Even in 1080p the image quality looks fantastic.
Mons Awesome! It so small and so capable and so sexy xD are there any features you don't like?
I just love everything about it! Probably the only thing I don't like is the sound it makes when you use the zoom. Although I like how smooth and fast the zoom is.
When you do get one, definitely play around with the settings and the shortcuts/presets that you can customize :D
Wait a minute, they've launched a rx10 MK iii? Who knows by the time I walk to the stores, there might be a a6400 waiting in the shelves ;-)
a6500 is out now
After using the RX100IV for about a year, I cannot overstate how valuable it is to have a camera that fits into my jeans and pants. I can literally throw it in my pocket and hop on my bike without worry or discomfort. Adding that it's a virtually silent shooter, completely silent with electronic shutter activated, makes this camera perfect for food blogging and street photography. It does seem to struggle a bit with clarity in wider shots, such as landscapes which begs the question: how does the RX100IV compare to the RX1RII? Among the obvious comparisons, are they equally pocketable and silent? Lastly, when should we expect the RX100V and where will it stand?
hi hows the video autofocus in the RX100IV? is it fast? or slow?
I don't shoot video
There is really no comparison between the RX100IV and the RX1RII. They are so different that I can't see who would be deciding between the two, but to answer your questions: 1) it is silent, 2) it is not at all pocketable in my opinion mainly because of the lens (41mm overall depth vs 72mm).
would the 6300 with a kit lens fit in the back pocket of most jeans
Excellent.
nice video
Sony A6300 does over heat
plus no stability
Do you know if Sony will make RX100 V ??
+Helena Peacemaker why is the inclusion of a mic input such complicated ? Why do brands such as Sony do cameras fo video, but insist on ignoring good audio? For me the absence of a mic input is just plain nonsence... and a way of getting custumers annoyed... Every cheap camecorder has a fully articulated LCD and a mic input, and the video quality is much worse than the IQ of the Sony RX... even the 6000 didn't offer a mic input...why?!??!!!?!?!?!?!?!
+lboymusic +lboymusic I think it's a marketing strategy on their part. They're offering a great product with lots of features a lot of cameras won't have in the price range and omitting a feature to make you look into their a7r or a7s lines which is more expensive. They don't want to put those features in the a6300 to cannibalize their higher end models
RX 100 VI IS GOOD