Here are some other great RDR3 idea videos that you should watch next... Zonkers: ruclips.net/video/9hPrdpeCUrA/видео.html&pp=ygUEcmRyMw%3D%3D Waxy: ruclips.net/video/oLBEnzLTfhw/видео.html&pp=ygUJcmRyMyB3YXh5
How about remaining original Red dead Revolver? Expanding it and fleshing out the world, story and characters along with bringing the gameplay to new levels As for RDR3 I hope they go back and do an original story but during the height of the Wild West. We have gotten games which were towards the end
I thought it would be interesting if they base rdr3 off of Blood Meridian. It follows the Granton gang, a group of mercenaries hired by the government to hunt down Indians attacking homesteads and towns. It's an extremely brutal book with no good guys, but I think it would be really interesting to make a game off of
I’ve always thought to play as Mac (who dies in the black water massacre). The final main story mission would be the black water massacre and then you play as Arthur and move to the grizzlies on the epilogue…which flows right into RDR2!
And also we thought we know to much about john when rdr2 came out but they always say they wanna go back to the west they can make such a good game if we play in the van der linde gang again
That would work. Someone died from the gang too in blackwater, but then the epilogue will be basically rdr2, not some new story. Remember rdr MCs must die to get the redemption.
Game about colm O'Driscoll's brother would be perfect, you finally get to explore the real wild west at its prime, it actually has some ties to the var der linde gang, and it follows the rdr rule that the main character die at the end of the game (by dutch)@@RedDeadTierLists
Jack is the biggest theory, also easily the worst option. If you go too modern, you ruin the franchise like Mafia did with 3. RDR3 shouldnt follow anyone from RDR storyline. If anything, it should follow Red Harlow from Revolver and possibly tie the Revolver storyline to Redemption.
i think it would be great if we play as jack trough 1914-1930s as he fights in ww1 and joins an italian mob(maybe some bronto brother or something similar, considering he has experience with italians)
@@outlavv9892 it wouldnt make sense for jack to enter gangs or mobs because he probably wouldnt make the same mistakes that john did by becoming an outlaw he becomes a writer anyway
Uncle is the only character that has potential for a good game set in his early life in my opinion. I know everyone thinks Uncle is Red Harlow, but R* debunked that. So his backstory, and even his real name, is completely unknown. He’s always telling dramatic stories that no one believes, so it’d be kinda sick if the lazy old drunk actually turned out to be a badass back in the day. That, or we could play as the member of a gang Uncle ran with when he was young, like rdr2. Yeah it’d be reusing the same concept, but It would give us the chance to keep exploring the old west through a completely new gang, while also keeping a familiar face around. Other than that, I think the Van Der Linde gang’s story is finished and should be left where it’s at.
I think we need to know what happened to Sadie Adlers dad. Why is Sadie so tough? Your honor if it's good can have an ending where you end up being a good dad and raising Sadie right. Or you can have low honor, but still very much love your daughter and have a strong relationship with her. Your last moments as a low honor ending could be going out fighting for her and she had to witness you die. Both would explain why she was so tough and it would be set in a time frame closer to the civil war. You could even have a run in with Wyatt Earp. you could either help him or at the end Wyatt Earp guns you down. the options are wide open and the only option I see to stay withing the Dutch Vanderlin gang lore while having a completely separate cast of characters without the ending being predictable.
I agree. The Van Der Linde gang's story has already been told. What hasn't been told wouldn't be able to make it as it's own game. We should move to something fresh and new. Maybe even a different part of the West, and get to see the redemption story of someone new
I think the Native American angle could be really interesting to explore. That, or they could do a freed slave right after the civil war who’s trying to make his new life out west. Those are real-life types of historical people who don’t get explored enough.
This is finally a good idea I've seen in the comments. I'm tired of sequels and prequels. We need new stuff. GTA is always bringing new casts and stories that are successful, why can't the same be for RDR? If they do the slave thing, they should make breaking out and possibly freeing people a part of the story.
@@NoCluYT That could be the opening mission, yeah! And the dynamic between a freed slave and native Americans he would meet along the way (who are being actively pushed out) could be really interesting
I think we should just play as a whole new character in fact we should play as a leader of a gang in the prime Wild West era and eventually we see our gang fall and actually let the character live because in every RDR the character dies but instead we should have everyone we care about taken away from us including animals, friends, family etc. I think that would make an amazing story because our character doesn’t die but he wishes he would because he no longer has purpose so tbh that’s a game of the year winner right there
Charles’s dad would be a great story. Start from escaped slave from Shady Belle who joins the Union Army during the Civil War. Kills a bunch of Lemoyne Raiders during & after the war during Reconstruction. Then is forced to move out West where he becomes a Buffalo Soldier helping fight Native Americans. He becomes conflicted with helping the white men massacre & oppress Native people similar to how they did his people during slavery. He could get captured by the Wapiti, falls in love with Charle’s native mother while as a prisoner, has Charles and then kills a white Army officer to save them thrusting into him becoming an outlaw . He and his family go on the run where he is eventually killed by a lawman posse or Pinkertons forcing his wife and son to return to their people and submit to the Army.
Why do so many people want to see Jack’s story continued? By 1914 there was truly no outlaw from the Wildwest left who was alive, not behind bars or who didn’t reforme.
Its a bit of an odd one, people are complaining about continuing Jack's story in Red Dead 3 would not work, and yet there are also people complaining that Jack did not feel as an interesting character because there was next to do nothing to do at him at the end of Red Dead 1 after killing Ross.
because they are not thinking about reality probably. by the time jack grows up to be a man it's ww1. the world will have become too advanced by this point for it to even be a western genre anymore with machine guns and tanks roaming around aint nobody shooting cattleman revolvers anymore. it would more likely transform into the gangster genre. Hanging out with john dillinger or something haha. but ya no more jack please. stick to the western time period is a must. personally i think one more story with red harlow would be nice with modern technology to power it.
DLC where you work on the Ferry as the girl Dutch shoots except you do not know it is her till you see the flash in your face from Dutch pulling the trigger.
I really hope that it’s not another prequel involving any of the Van Der Linde gang members. It would feel like filler and there would be no redemption story to be told but somehow people don’t understand that.
Fully agree, the next game needs a new story that can support itself without having to rely on already established characters. We all love the current story but it’s run its course and people need to come to terms with that
I do think it could be cool if there were a couple missions or events where you had run ins with certain members of the van der Linde gang, or could witness the impact they had on the west, but rdr3 needs its own focal point with a new protagonist, new characters, and new story
A uncle prequel story before the gang in the prime of Wild West sounds like a good game to me it a lot to unfold with uncle past because we don’t even know his real name so rockstar can have a fresh slate and do whatever they want with a younger uncle because he didn’t fall in the gang until he was older
Agreed. Also people wanting it to end in the Blackwater massacre make no sense, it would not work at all because how would there be an epilogue/post-game free roam? That heist took place literally right before chapter 1 of RDR2 so there’s really nothing you can do there. Also the obsession with Blackwater is crazy. IMO it’s better left a mystery. We already know enough to infer what happened anyways.
Crazy that the guy who played as Eagle Flies is the same guy Gus killed with the box cutter in Breaking Bad. Was watching Dark Winds and immediately recognized him from BB but when he would talk he delivers his lines EXACTLY line Eagle Flies. Looked him up and yep, same guy, Jeremiah Bitsui
Give us a hardcore mode. My biggest criticism in Red Dead is that they force certain mechanics that are majorly tedious (Eating, drinking and no fast travel) in order to add realism but the minute you get into a fire fight it's the easiest combat in gaming whilst you can take 100 bullets without dying
Finally somebody who says it, I love rdr2 story but damn the gameplay felt so easy (gunfight-wise only), I literally never used any health tonic or whatever they are called hahaha, u know those that puts your health bar and hearth golden? U just took cover and start aiming and shooting carelessly and that was it hahaha so easy
@@sssesssarsssturn off auto aim and the map it makes the fire fights way more tense and exciting like riding your horse then bounty hunters find you and ambush you some of the best gun fights I had
@chrisoctober9921 The problem with this is you are fully aware that you are making the game harder for yourself just because. I won't ever mess with options just to make the game harder, that's what modes are for. It's like turning the Crosshairs off on FPS's when the game is designed to have crosshairs
you dont know arthur is going to die until far into the playthrough though, yeah he wasn't in rd1 but that doesn't mean his death was predictable like it would be for other characters
One thing I've never seen mentioned is that we could play as Micah's brother, who's mentioned to have gone straight in a letter he sent to Micah (You can find it in camp during Shady Belle at the place you go talk to Strauss for the money lending and other sins V i believe?), it implies that Micah ran with his brother for a while, but said brother (I think his name was Amos) feels bad about his outlaw days with micah and tries to be a better man. The story could be like their outlaw days (but that'd be too cliche right?) so i think do something like RDR2 where Amos and Micah split up at the beginning of the game, with a failed heist or micah thinking Amos betrayed him so he decides to run before Micah kills him, and eventually at the end, we can see Amos with his family. Maybe at the end he could get gunned down by the law for running with micah? that's a lot of parallels though.
20:32 What would go amazingly as an Easter egg to the second game was if like, as your a native American you could be on a mission where your tracking down an outlaw that did something yo you ect, and you've been out in the wild for days straight without food when your struck by a snake, no medicine, and right when you think your fate will end, arthur morgan rides past and asks why your inna Bush randomly, upon discovery sucks the venom out and gives you a few days worth of food, what could be such a life or death situation for your character? Could be made to seem like just a 'random encounter' for arthur like he gets alot in the second game (bear traps, snake bites, poisoned people ect) Just seeing the way itd slot together perfectly and still be a little easter egg to "Arthur's redemption" would be orgasm worthy...
My proposition for Red Dead 3: We get to play as either Dutch's father or someone close to him. All we know about Dutch's father is that he died in the Civil War, which means the way he dies and the timing of his death can be left to creative decision. The great thing about Dutch's is that he doesn't even yet have a name, and if he were a cowboy, it would have been just before the "prime" of cowboys. My idea is that it can take inspiration from both games. He would be a family man to Dutch and Greta, while also being on the run from the government. Perhaps he was the leader of his gang, a charming one similar to Dutch, however his gang is starting to flourish because the golden age for the cowboy is coming up. All of a sudden the government shows up like the pinkertons in rdr2 and tell him that he is drafted. His response is killing the government men however one escapes and informs his superiors starting this great chase like Dutch and the Pinkertons in Rdr2. The chase then causes many members (who can be literally anyone because there's no real information from this period) to die and it makes Dutch's father realize he must sacrifice himself and surrender to the government to join the army and fight in the Civil War for whichever side he's on (that information is up for creative decision because all we know is he at some point lived in Philadelphia). He could even have a cinematic death similar to Arthur as the specifics aren't yet known. We could also have an epilogue using this format where we play as Dutch and it can show the roots of the Van der Linde game like him meeting Arthur and Hosea and Grimshaw. I know it's complex but that's just my general idea for a Red Dead Redemption III that doesn't recycle a bunch of known characters and introduces a fresh time period
Game about colm O'Driscoll's brother would be perfect, you finally get to explore the real wild west at its prime, it actually has some connection to the var der linde gang, and it follows the rdr rule that the main character die at the end (by dutch)
@@MRBass6000I like to think Colm's brother would die in a heroic way like Arthur's maybe Colm's brother would be like Hosea and a less evil version of Colm
tbh it would be interesting but still wont feel like rdr2 bc this one is so good bc of the camp interactions imo. For me it was bind blowing how included i felt and it wasnt like any other game with 2 line npcs. You actually feel the camp alive. I spent hours and hours just wandering in camp and you cant rlly get that feeling playing a solo character.
@@jamskinnerI personally don’t agree. They finished their story and we learn a lot from both 1&2. I’d rather get a game with all new characters. There could be references to the VLD but their story is finished
I dislike the young Arthur theory or Landon theory because where is the redemption there they always forget it’s a story about redemption and in my opinion I think the main characters in a series like this should die
A game about Landon would be great because 1. he did have redemption by leaving the United States 2. he dies 3. we dont know much about him so it leaves a lot of room for lore 4. some people think Arthur is a better gunslinger than Landon ricketts so it would shut them up
Opening scene of landon and a mentor of his. Mentor killed. Landon then takes up teaching a protoge (player character) who is a young everyman but wants to be a gunfighter. Landon gets his revenge, Character dies, epilogue landon avenges his protoge getting revenge again and then ends in chuparosa 1902 boom not very hard
What if in the traitor theory, he learns later in the game that the black water heist is a setup of sorts and tries to say it is, however, he’s killed because they believe he wants to stop the gang from getting a big score?
@@edwardsiggies2680 I mean they didn’t talk much about Arthur *because it was a while ago* so I feel as if they could pull the same magic for this idea
Rockstar should make a more modernized game where you can play as a gangster. It’d be cool to have multiple main characters too like one would be an ex bank robber who has a family and gets back into the life of robbing and maybe another main character that’s crazy or something we could call him Trevor or something idk I think that would be cool
Idk if that would sell. What are you saying, there should be cars instead of horses and the game should have 3 protagonists set in a fictionalized version of LA?
This is my personal pick for the next RDR game. I’ve commented this in other videos, so some people could have seen this already. Keep in mind I am not a professional story writer, nor do I work for rockstar. This story of mine is really interesting to me, so I want to share it with others. Above my actual story, I think my setting is probably what they should go with. TLDR: Game set at the end of the Civil War, including an ex confederate soldier first protagonist, and a freed slave second protagonist. Game is focused around redemption of character and morality questions. I’ve said this for years the Van Der Linde Gang story should be over. There’s no way games before or after make sense. I think a game set in the last months to the end of the Civil War would be amazing. New cast of characters, possibly a soldier who has to redeem himself. The time period is a perfect balance between civilized cities and completely untamed frontiers. As a history nerd, the political landscape at the time would be so interesting to me. I think the best way to go with it would be to play as an ex confederate soldier, someone who deserted. You’re marked for death by the confederacy, the Union, and confederate loyalists after the war ends. This could set up areas of the map which are more or less hostile. As well as having ample unique antagonists. A fictional Washington DC and Richmond would be amazing. The dichotomy between the two cities would be so cool to see. Maybe the protagonist was forced to take part in a massacre and tries to redeem himself by doing good acts through criminal means. Having to always question his morality and ethicality. You would meet various characters that you run with or do missions for, sort of like RDR1, but this time you’re hunted. I eventually think this character would have to die, like prior games. The question for who the second protagonist should be is up for debate, but I think a freed slave would be the best choice. Maybe freed by our character, freed by himself, or as a result of the war. This ex slave would have to be integral to the story, so having him run with our ex solider would be essential. They would most likely meet in a hostile interaction but realize they need each other. Being on almost complete separate isles of this conflict, but both are wanted men. Mutual respect would go a long way between the two. Eventually, our second protagonist would avenge the first. There’s a lot of places our second character could go, so I will leave that up to you. Maybe a US Marshall like the real life Bass Reeves, a farmer, living off the grid, or living in plain sight in a city. Although our second protagonist should start a family and name his kid after our first character. Our characters would be motivated to be free from conflict, live on their own terms, and secure a future for themselves. I think R* would have to be very careful with this to not be historically inaccurate. They also would need to be extremely careful to not portray the Union as an antagonist. I wouldn’t want this to be a pro confederate, anti union game. Along with that, I don’t think portraying the Union as a bastion of good and the confederacy the epitome of evil would be good either. They also would need to portray battles with respect for the people who fought in them. I recognize that playing as an ex confederate could be controversial, so nuance would be crucial. Our character wouldn’t be a confederate ideologue, probably just a poor solider who was drafted to fight. For these reasons, I am not sure how likely R* would be willing to make this game, but they can pull it off. If done right, this story would be amazing for media in general, not just video games. There’s many more things that I can elaborate on, but this is just a simple outline of the story. People have brought ideas to me ranging from our second protagonist being in an African confederate unit, seeing early lemoyne raiders, Dutch’s dad, and more. Feel free to reply with more suggestions.
Yeah, I think a Post Civil War or Reconstruction game could be really interesting, but imo I think the game should focus more on the West Coast area where the wild west really sprung up.
Idk tho because I just feel like that's not what read dead is about and I feel like the van Der linde gang really made read dead what it is everybody thinks of Dutch and the gang when they hear the words read dead redemption and sometimes I feel like maybe they shouldn't even continue the series because of how perfect read dead 2 was and how it ended it just wouldn't feel right to make an entirely new storyline with different characters after all we've been through with the van Der linde gang (imo)
@@Aids9898 I agree, I don’t think we need to call it Red Dead Redemption 3 for that reason. Just name it Red Dead Reconstruction, or any word that starts with R to keep the theme for the title. We had Red Dead Revolver, which wasn’t related to RDR1 and RDR2. I just think that the RDR story with Dutch and the gang is done, anything more would either be entirely unnecessary or just lack substance. The Red Dead games are a gold mine for rockstar (no pun intended) and I don’t see them stopping Wild West games anytime soon. RDR2 brought the series to new heights, they’re going to want to capitalize on it.
At first I wasn't entirely sold on your idea but the more I read it, the more I got excited for a game like that. Could be really interesting to see, since I can't think of any games off the top of my head that are set in that time period, at least not open world games like RDR.
@@matthewcioffi6385 exactly! I think this would probably be the first AAA game that is set in the American Civil War. At least that I know of. It’s a time period that is still very important to learn from. In RDR2 they referenced it a lot, so I think they may actually go with it. Thank you!
i think red dead 3 should have the protagonist be black belle. she was a legendary gunslinger that was deemed " too dangerous" to approach in the in game quest and her story has an obscure end where she literally just rides away from you.
I really hope rdr3 is a new story with a new character/gang not everything needs to be connected to the van der linde story as it’s a story that is finished
Arthur at some point mentioned when I think talking to Tilly about someone who died in camp who was a traitor. But it was probably some kind of joke on the rule about no spilling blood in camp.
The problem with making a RDR3 is that there’s nothing more to do with the Dutch Van Der Linde gang and its members, but making the third installment not about them will turn everyone off because it’s all anyone knows. Playing a game that you know has the same name as the first 2 means you’re only there because of them, so a game that has nothing or very little to do with the first game will turn all the original fans away, and being a third installment will mean no new players will be so willing to come. I think it’s best to end the series with RDR2, there’s just nothing else to do with it. It’s not a GTA series.
The problem is that Red Dead REDEMPTION 2 even exists. They should've followed suit with the first two games (Revolver & Redemption) and had a new name that started with "R" Redemption 2 could've easily have been disconnected from the Van Der Linde gang entirely and been about the new characters they made. Image a Red Dead "Revenge" story about Sadie Adler seeking vengeance on the O'Driscol gang, for example
Landon Rickettes would be fire, I just think having the main character being one of his gang members would be much more interesting. Maybe playing as Landon in the epilogue would be cool tho.
@@RedDeadTierLists yeah I’d say something along those lines and maybe the epilogue is the shootout he was apparently at in blackwater or we could have said gang member leave somehow be it death or just quitting
@@RyanG0899how, native americans were very present during the wild west and played an integral role in daily life among settlers. i think natives often arent given proper representation either which would give rockstar a good opportunity to shine. just because we arent playing as a “cowboy” doesn’t necessarily mean it isnt western
Gotta agree with Symin there is plenty of ground to cover with natives and settlers. Both good and bad and I mean shown from both sides. No stupid agendas trying to portray one or the other as the "good guys" as history tends to teach things typically aren't black and white. Same goes for this topic.
My first idea was play as Colms brother. We saw the end of the gang, the aftermath of the gang, why not the formation of the gang. You play as the brother when they all still were working together. See a younger Dutch and Hosea, a very young author around the gang camps like Jack, and when the final fights happens, you then take over a 18 to 19 year old author for the prolog.
20:36 Imagine rdr 3 as a native gunslinger in the peak of the wild west as you said. Maybe kind of early into the game after the prologue. And you ride in to this big western town in the desert and the native you play as discovers the white civilisation, and of the way the whites act. And one of the first sights you see as the character you play as is a brawl going on, maybe a bar fight or a duel on the street. And then after the brawl you see that the person who won the fight was Arthur in his wildest days when he was young and cocky. Would be a nice cameo and a cool way to start of an epic story for the native gunslinger.
Oregon trail style intro, then playing as one of three outlaws: white, Mexican /Murrieta type, or Indian..taking place between 1840-60. At the end, you have a Chile shown, which could be a VDL Gang member
We know 3 things about the Traitor They were a traitor They were killed in camp They joined and died before tilly joined The only way to know we play as the traitor is if rockstar said "oh yeah btw you play as the traitor". The second game introduced new characters that died off characters that weren't even mentioned in rdr1 so how come rdr3 can't do that. I can not try to agree that a traitor game wouldn't work. Also theres a trend in the franchise Rdr1 is about the post gang and pretty much post wild west and rdr2 focuses on the end of the gang and wild west so why cant rdr3 be about the prime of the gang and wild west honestly they probably could do a similar thing for an rdr4 the birth of the gang and birth of the prime of the wild west becuase you cant view the birth of the wild west and the gang at the same time.
@@laurie550 why? Is it just not possible to explain things before throwing out a take like you blurted out a point with no damn explanation and evidence to you're take
Before rdr2 the gang had only been in West Elizabeth and New Austin so the map would be even smaller then rdr2s map and there is no way to counter this point the map is way smaller among other reasons
@@laurie550 there's more west than new Austin they will just do what they did in rdr2 introduce an entire new area to the map and then after you beat the game unlock rdr1 2 and 3s maps together its not that complicated
RDR3 Should in my opinion: Be set during 1865-1882 Follow a New Cast Have a few Cameos from RDR1 and RDR2 Characters Have some of the RDR2 Map, maybe just New Austin and West Elizabeth, with the rest being brand new. And leave the door open for RDR4, and Finally, It Must Have a Good Online. RDO2 Can't be as bad as RDO Was
hell nah. rd4 is too far. even the debatability of what rdr3 should be about might be too far. I think it should be about the gang tho because it's always been the story of the gang. in 1 you pick off the remnants of the gang, in 2 you see the gangs downfall, 3 only makes sense you see the gangs uprising and in their prime
@@datguy8460 The van der Linde Gangs Story I'd Done. I hate to say this, but we know too much for a RDR3 Prequel, amd no one can get their red dead Redemption. What else is there to tell. And the RDR4 Thing yeah that's kinda dumb but TakeTwo and R* need that Money, Boah
@@TheSoapontheWii360 "know too much" damn that's such a lame way of experiencing these stories. especially since we've literally only seen the end of it. would it really be such a big problem if we just saw situations or locations they described and even new minor characters or obstacles? apparently the gang has been all across the country across a 20 year timespan yet we just see the end of the story. was the star wars prequel trilogy ruined because we "knew too much" like who exactly was going to rule the entire galaxy?
@@datguy8460 Look, We Know that nothing too important is going to happen, because why wasn't it mentioned in the second game. I Wish we had a new prequel with Arthur, John, Dutch, and the others, I Don't Think It Will Work. No one seen in RDR2 and RDR1 Will Die, and if someone new is there, they either have to die or Lesve the Gang, but then again why weren't they mentioned in RDR2?
@@TheSoapontheWii360 who cares? not every story hasnt to have an arch to it nor have major new characters. that's why I say minor characters or obstacles. some that an 18 year old arthur, dutch and hosea would deal with and then forget 15 years later. it's such a large time span, anyone and anything could happen that they could forget or don't mention. there could be a dozen more gang members we didn't see. def more heists we didn't see. this series has gone too far to be about anything other than the van der linde gang that it seems the only sensible option would be to go back. otherwise it would feel like a completely different game picking a new set of characters
Honestly the best option would be a game set either in the 50’s-60’s or in the 70’s-80’s with a new story. Maybe a little mission that feature Dutch and Hosea teaming up or trying to scam the protagonist for fan service
@@e-1074 1860s and 1870s. Besides there are many westerns that do that. No Country for Old Men is considered one. I'm not a huge fan of the idea though since I don't really want the Ven Der Linde gang back. Their story is over
Low-key I don't think there should be an rdr3 , the community is soo split on ideas for THEIR own satisfaction and it's a lose lose situation for rockstar, we need a prime theme or at least a main timeline
As much as I love the series, I agree. I’m confident that there will be a new Red Dead game but I feel like the redemption/Van der linde story is over.
@@cindyxrdz what we need is to decide a TIMELINE first then start thinking on what it could be, because a lot of words start with R and that could be a clever sweep 4 rockstar but once we decide a timeline we think, cuz rdr3 is a big project 4 r*
Hot take: you play as the leader of a gang that’s not ever heard of and you have to manage it by manipulating the members or doing something good and people would leave or join depending on the status of your gang
Playing as a cop would just feel more like an LA Noire sequel to me. And to be honest if Rockstar did make another Noire game I think late victorian era London would be the best setting. Imagine trying to solve Jack the Ripper's case. Secondly: I think we should have a remake of Red Dead Revolver. I played it way back when and as objectively subpar as it is the game had a LOT of potential and it stood on strong legs because it was strongly influenced by spaghetti westerns.
I believe rdr3 should be as Mac but it shouldn’t start in black water. They should do about 5-6 chapters in different towns in a Different map then the last chapter could be black water or either black water epilogue
Imo. I think it should be Jack. He chose revenge just like John did. In this franchise our protagonist deal with “actions have consequences” and in the case of John especially revenge really was a fool game. So I would be completely open picking up right where we left off in 1914 with Jack and tell the story of him going on the run for being suspected of killing Edgar Ross. 1 last old west story. World War I is a non-issue. Rdr1 ends in 1914 but America doesn’t join the war until April 1917. But regardless the entire war from start to finish was never once fought on American soil. So you can easily just leave the war as something that’s only mentioned in newspapers or by npc’s.
I like it ending with that more than that being a beginning. The old West Dies, Jack finished the story for the gang and John. Times are changed at that point not changing. If you think about it, the end of RDR1 is like leading into the age of GTA. Cars are invented at that point. So to me 1880-1899 has to be the timeframe. If you set it like 5-6 years before RDR2 maybe there is a perfect Easter egg for your character to meet a Pregnant Woman who mentions she likes the name "Jack".
But Jack’s story is left ambiguous for a reason. He looks at his gun SYMBOLICALLY, knowing he’ll have to use it again. It’s the cycle of violence that Arthur and John tried to keep him from, but ironically he doesn’t end up breaking. We don’t need Jack.
@@tblcyek I mean I understand that pov. But we didn’t really even need the prequel especially focusing on brand new guy that we’ve never seen or heard of until RDR 2. Rdr could’ve easily been a 1 and done storyline. I’m definitely open to a Jack game in the end of the day assuming they don’t kill him, leave him in prison or severely disabled as his ending.
Landon Ricketts actually did end up dying, idk why im mentioning it but I was playing rdr1 recently and when you become jack you can see his death in the newspaper
The difficulty of coming up with a good story for RDR2 is shown here so its easy to say RDR2 would and should be the last RDR game. Also, have to give it to you. People just spew out their ideas they formed in their heads without giving them a single thought about implications and how they would work, and you seems to be the only person so far i've seen that rejected all these dumb theories bcz they actually wouldn't work in the grand scheme of things.
Would be interesting to maybe play as the Jack Hall gang. They’re mentioned in a campfire song and also you can find the treasure maps. Set it in the 1870’s-80’s and it would be its own thing.
It makes sense for the 3rd installment of red dead redemption to take place before rdr2, like before the black water heist, it only makes sense because the games are kind of going backwards, rdr1 is after rdr2, and rdr3 would be before rdr2 and we would finally get a closing to the series knowing all the lore and stuff
My thoughts are that it would be kind of cool to add a red dead redemption game based on both the start of the game and the start of the mafia (adding the title, and adding it to the series of red dead redemption) but for the sole purpose of just having something to do or be interesting or fun not necessarily be a main game, like somethings that have not to perfect but specifically for red dead redemption three they have to perfect it
What if you play as Landon Rickets? His story wouldn’t be to hard to figure out his story he is based on a real sheriff but I don’t know. his story is very famous he took down some of the most infamous outlaws of the Wild West pretty much by himself He’s based off Wyatt Earp. He took down three of the most famous gunslingers by himself outside the OK corral
Developing a Red Dead Redemption 3 presents a unique challenge, particularly because we have a substantial amount of information about characters associated with Dutch. This background could potentially restrict the opportunities for a compelling narrative. To preserve the essence of the series, it may be beneficial to explore fresh storylines instead of continuing one that feels complete. It's worth noting that the Red Dead series began with 2004’s Red Dead Revolver, where players assume the role of bounty hunter Red Harlow. A promising direction for the series could be to create a game titled Red Dead Revolver 2, or a variation like Red Dead Revolver: [add subtitle here]. This approach would allow us to further explore Red Harlow’s story and the world of the Red Dead series, taking place after the events of the original game. Such a direction could invigorate the universe and provide a richer narrative experience.
I think a Lyle Morgan game should be heavily considered, or at least someone who ran with him in a gang or something. Lyle could’ve been a terrible man at first, beating or abusing his child at least mentally, doing bad things, but as he sees his grow and he realizes all the bad he’s done then he finally does something good which maybe saves Arthur, which is why he keeps his hat, and it leads to Lyle being executed. Then maybe we play as Arthur. We have to consider that when thinking about a story as well, because so far both games you’ve played as a new character at the end. But also playing as a member of the gang is a good way of getting close, but not too close to Arthur and his father and seeing those bad things. The game be about that person seeing Lyle die, realizing all their bad they’ve done together or something. And it would work well with letting us play as Arthur at the end, which could also time jump to when he’s a young adult and just falling in with Dutch and Hosea. And now we have the origin story of the gang. Just like we got the origin story of John Marston, and Beechers hope.
I actually think the Lyle Morgan idea could be really intriguing if it was spun kinda like the breaking bad type father doing unethical things to provide for his family. Kinda like how at the end Walt Jr. hated walter you could frame it as Lyle actually cared about his son but arthur never found out/ only saw his bad side.
I think you should play as mac or davey Callander because since you know there gonna die at the end of the game it would be hard to get attached to them like you do with Arthur and John so the story would have to go above and beyond to make that happen
@@dominicstclairstudios6324 doesn’t matter, it doesn’t make any sense. Their parent company makes the mafia series with great accuracy they won’t ruin it for a game that doesn’t check out. Thank god you aren’t in a position to give ideas.
I just want the next Red Dead game to be about different characters entirely, i feel like the RDR series is good as is, and it doesn't need another addition.
I 100% agree. It should be treated as a more historical version of GTA. Every GTA mainline game is a completely different story with different characters in different places.
I still really like the idea of RDR3 continuing the story of Jack as becomes a writer while trying to finally leave his old life behind and with the ending having him break the cycle where instead of dying like Arthur and John he’s the one that gets out completely and lives the rest of his life in peace. I definitely don’t think it should be a WW1 or Mafia game cause it goes against the themes and setting of the series imo.
There should be no red dead redemption 3 there cant be unless ur creating a whole new story van der linde gang can not be in it at all for it to be good.
I think playing as Colm o’driscall would be sick like learning his pov on the van der linde gang and his hatred with Dutch and all he went through during rdr2
Playing as Charles when he was younger would be sweet cause in the beginning of the story he was doing stuff alone but he didn’t really talk about what he did
The prologue should be a short few missions as a very young Arthur or John then transition to you being Mac Callander playing the glory years of the gang with the epilogue taking a small time skip and ending with the blackwater massacre and Mac being killed by Milton
I don't really think the glory years of the gang would be easy to tell a story that fits in the Red Dead dynamic because the other two games have been full on tragedies.
@@RedDeadTierListsI definitely think they should do Mac I wanna see how skilled he was and he also sacrificed himself for Arthur and the gang to escape
And this takes place after Arthur death where Micah walks away and then you get to play as him and do what everything he did while he was gone until the very end where he dies, and you have to go back to two kill Micah
Maybe Colm's brother, We know little about him, Maybe we play as him like John and Arthur and then he is killed by dutch so then it switch to colm like Jack and John, where Colm revenge against dutch by killing Anabelle or something.
It’s already been hinted at that Mac and Davey are the protagonists of the third game. I mean it’s like the first character that they show when we start RDRII. They talk about them constantly in the camp. It’s like they wrote them in with the intention of re playing RDR2 after you finish RDR3. But what I would like them to do is let us play as the Calloway brothers, Arthur and John just like GTA.
My idea is a DLC I call it RED DEAD Asian, it pretty much takes place in Lemoyne in 1875 when the Lemoyne Raiders where more than just a Nuisance. There a gang that's Pretty much different than any other gang in RDR2 there trained by Army soldiers and In my opinion they Ambush the player better than any other gang in the game in My opinion You play as a Asian Character his Parents move to America for a better life and his father joined in the civil war to fight against the confederacy To get citizenship After the war the father came home but the house was attacked by confederate soldiers Because the father stole documents that can reveal Spies among the union Years later The son Has those documents And wants revenge on the Lemoyne Raiders for killing his mother and scaring his face when he was 11 The comedic relief character is a man named ralph L. Dalton AKA the Gun store owner in valentine
Sadie, or Charles story could work since after RDR2 finishes Sadie heads off down to South and Central America and Charles heads up to Canada. RDR3 could be about Sadie's adventures into Mexico or further down into South America and her meeting with Charels and such. OR there could be a story about Charles and his adventure up to Canada and finding a Wife there and having a child at the end of the game.
You know how John is against Dutch in the first game than in the second game you play when John was in he’s Dutch gang, what about something similar but you play as Colm ol’drisco being tighter with Dutch and tell their story, you know.
This might be too much of a departure but the dust bowl could be an interesting setting. There were a bunch of interesting outlaws that popped up during that time. Ma Baker, John Dillinger Bonnie and Clyde.
you say about how its bad we already know the fate of mac but we knew the fate of arthur if you played rdr1 since he didnt appear or was mentioned. imo if we are continuing the gangs story playing as mac it would make sense since some dialogue from bill says that mac wasnt a good man but he wasnt all bad which sets up a honor system
@RedDeadTierLists Yeah, but it would feel weird having a whole new cast of characters. I mean, GTA does that, but Red dead redemption Is a connected story it'll just be weird
Maybe Dutch was in a gang before he created one with Hosea and that was the Legendary Gunslinger’s Gang, except this gunslinger is a Native. It would explain why Dutch has such sympathy for the natives and people of color. Granted he manipulates these people, but he did the same with Arthur so it isn’t discriminatory. I think it would be cool if this guy humbled Dutch in some way, showing him what it takes to be an outlaw and run a gang. The ending if low honor high honor could be the protagonist choosing to defend other natives or dying with the gang. This leaves us some options and doesn’t necessarily spoil us with a death.
another important thing to note is that unless they change two redemption to something else like they did from revolver the character needs a redemption arc or something
Play as young author, dutch and Hosea like GTA 5 missions were you can play as all 3 before the blackwater tragedy and your final mission is the blackwater incident before going into rdd2
Here are some other great RDR3 idea videos that you should watch next...
Zonkers: ruclips.net/video/9hPrdpeCUrA/видео.html&pp=ygUEcmRyMw%3D%3D
Waxy: ruclips.net/video/oLBEnzLTfhw/видео.html&pp=ygUJcmRyMyB3YXh5
same pr pic
Maybe playing as young uncle learn his real name see what he has done when he was younger…
How about remaining original Red dead Revolver? Expanding it and fleshing out the world, story and characters along with bringing the gameplay to new levels
As for RDR3 I hope they go back and do an original story but during the height of the Wild West. We have gotten games which were towards the end
I thought it would be interesting if they base rdr3 off of Blood Meridian. It follows the Granton gang, a group of mercenaries hired by the government to hunt down Indians attacking homesteads and towns. It's an extremely brutal book with no good guys, but I think it would be really interesting to make a game off of
I’ve always thought to play as Mac (who dies in the black water massacre). The final main story mission would be the black water massacre and then you play as Arthur and move to the grizzlies on the epilogue…which flows right into RDR2!
If Rdr3 is a prequel, the final mission should be the Blackwater massacre. I don’t care about from who’s POV, I just wanna see it all go down
Yeah the would be a good idea but the blackwater massacre is like supposed to be a mystery so I would keep it at that
And also we thought we know to much about john when rdr2 came out but they always say they wanna go back to the west they can make such a good game if we play in the van der linde gang again
@@linus7263people say the van der Linde gang story is over, but I think we can get one more story out of them.
I think Rdr3 should be from Dutchs’ POV
That would work. Someone died from the gang too in blackwater, but then the epilogue will be basically rdr2, not some new story. Remember rdr MCs must die to get the redemption.
Fuck it let’s just play as uncle and call it the goddamn red dead lumbago 💀
This comment is Legendary😂🙌💯
@@nicoplays-is3mu LUMBAGOOO!! 😂😂
damn this shi is so funny 😐
@@aldeenztheman damn you must be fun to be around fr 💀💀
@@MiyagiiiYung forgot this is yt comments and not insta 😂😂😂😂
RDR3 you play as uncle during the peak of the Wild West with the ending of the game being uncles lumbago diagnoses
Red dead revolver
Lumbago diagnosis 😂
Would love to play as Uncle tho, maybe story ends when he joins the Gang
@@razorsimon6681You think He's Red Harlow?
- Well, what is it?
- It's not good news...
- Well I guessed that
- You got lumbago. I'm sorry, son, its a helluva thing
Regardless of what direction they take
You can bet Red Dead Redemption 3 will be the most beautiful game ever
Let's hope
You will be able to see ants in the ground and those ant's testicles will shrink during cold weather
@@pekkalaitinen8769😂😂 I always love pointing out the horses balls in the hot and cold in rd2 to my friends also
its gonna be copy and paste
Game about colm O'Driscoll's brother would be perfect, you finally get to explore the real wild west at its prime, it actually has some ties to the var der linde gang, and it follows the rdr rule that the main character die at the end of the game (by dutch)@@RedDeadTierLists
i think we need to play as Gavin, it’s the only obvious answer
100%
This is a flawless solution. Well done. 😂
I've always thought gavin was an alias of trelawny explains how he has like an infinite amount of friends as seen in the boat heist
@@Envixin753gavin’s friend is in saint denis
@@bjoernbertges113 trelawny is as well
Jack is the biggest theory, also easily the worst option. If you go too modern, you ruin the franchise like Mafia did with 3. RDR3 shouldnt follow anyone from RDR storyline. If anything, it should follow Red Harlow from Revolver and possibly tie the Revolver storyline to Redemption.
i think it would be great if we play as jack trough 1914-1930s as he fights in ww1 and joins an italian mob(maybe some bronto brother or something similar, considering he has experience with italians)
Revolver is just a tall-tail (legend) in the Redemption universe
In Red Dead Redemption you can hear about the events of Revolver via campfire stories
RDR3 should follow Sadie Adler and her story before she joined the gang and ending when she joined the gang
@@outlavv9892 it wouldnt make sense for jack to enter gangs or mobs because he probably wouldnt make the same mistakes that john did by becoming an outlaw he becomes a writer anyway
@@legowizard1018 well maybe you’re right and maybe not, jack did avenge his father in the end
7:41 man stood up for himself
Guy has impeccable balance
My prediction is this game will come out around 2035-2040
No shit
And minimum requirements are rtx 7090ti super 😂
Definitely way sooner. 2026 or 2027. 2030 at the latest.
@@Zack_410no way you think this is COD? Its gonna take atleast a decade
@@Zack_410 yaa
Uncle is the only character that has potential for a good game set in his early life in my opinion. I know everyone thinks Uncle is Red Harlow, but R* debunked that. So his backstory, and even his real name, is completely unknown. He’s always telling dramatic stories that no one believes, so it’d be kinda sick if the lazy old drunk actually turned out to be a badass back in the day. That, or we could play as the member of a gang Uncle ran with when he was young, like rdr2. Yeah it’d be reusing the same concept, but It would give us the chance to keep exploring the old west through a completely new gang, while also keeping a familiar face around. Other than that, I think the Van Der Linde gang’s story is finished and should be left where it’s at.
Red Dead Redemption 3: The Lumbago Chronicles
he dies in rdr1, we know his story
@@philipivanov1 lmfao it’s almost like you didn’t read the comment. But alright bro
I think we need to know what happened to Sadie Adlers dad. Why is Sadie so tough? Your honor if it's good can have an ending where you end up being a good dad and raising Sadie right. Or you can have low honor, but still very much love your daughter and have a strong relationship with her. Your last moments as a low honor ending could be going out fighting for her and she had to witness you die. Both would explain why she was so tough and it would be set in a time frame closer to the civil war. You could even have a run in with Wyatt Earp. you could either help him or at the end Wyatt Earp guns you down. the options are wide open and the only option I see to stay withing the Dutch Vanderlin gang lore while having a completely separate cast of characters without the ending being predictable.
I think the Van Der Linde gang's story is over even for a prequel. What more can you add that would even come close to rdr2
I agree. The Van Der Linde gang's story has already been told. What hasn't been told wouldn't be able to make it as it's own game. We should move to something fresh and new. Maybe even a different part of the West, and get to see the redemption story of someone new
I think it makes sense for rdr3 to tell the events up until the blackwater massacre
Jack's story
@@maxrocketansky did u watch video ?
@@p41vleee yes. He is 100% wrong
I think the Native American angle could be really interesting to explore. That, or they could do a freed slave right after the civil war who’s trying to make his new life out west. Those are real-life types of historical people who don’t get explored enough.
This is finally a good idea I've seen in the comments. I'm tired of sequels and prequels. We need new stuff. GTA is always bringing new casts and stories that are successful, why can't the same be for RDR? If they do the slave thing, they should make breaking out and possibly freeing people a part of the story.
@@NoCluYT That could be the opening mission, yeah! And the dynamic between a freed slave and native Americans he would meet along the way (who are being actively pushed out) could be really interesting
Man, the freed slave post-Civil War idea is really good. I want to be Samuel L's character from Hateful 8 lol
That would be awesome! Like a Django video game!
I think these are both great perspectives
I think we should just play as a whole new character in fact we should play as a leader of a gang in the prime Wild West era and eventually we see our gang fall and actually let the character live because in every RDR the character dies but instead we should have everyone we care about taken away from us including animals, friends, family etc. I think that would make an amazing story because our character doesn’t die but he wishes he would because he no longer has purpose so tbh that’s a game of the year winner right there
That would suck ass...
@@shantyclips6358 how? It seems like an interesting story
@@foofighters938
Taking everything away you grind for in a game sucks ass. In rdr2, you at least get 20k at the end.
Charles’s dad would be a great story. Start from escaped slave from Shady Belle who joins the Union Army during the Civil War. Kills a bunch of Lemoyne Raiders during & after the war during Reconstruction. Then is forced to move out West where he becomes a Buffalo Soldier helping fight Native Americans. He becomes conflicted with helping the white men massacre & oppress Native people similar to how they did his people during slavery. He could get captured by the Wapiti, falls in love with Charle’s native mother while as a prisoner, has Charles and then kills a white Army officer to save them thrusting into him becoming an outlaw . He and his family go on the run where he is eventually killed by a lawman posse or Pinkertons forcing his wife and son to return to their people and submit to the Army.
That could be a good fanfiction too
That would be so fire wtf😭😭
Best RDR3 idea ive ever seen
bro actually cooked
Damn, this is plausible. RDR3 confirmed?
Why do so many people want to see Jack’s story continued? By 1914 there was truly no outlaw from the Wildwest left who was alive, not behind bars or who didn’t reforme.
I agree, it's kind of beating a dead horse with the "WILD WEST IS OVER" themes
I agree, and we already saw him kill Ross, leaving even less of a motive for him
Or do a story about Pearson, the crazy cook who served in the army for a year
Its a bit of an odd one, people are complaining about continuing Jack's story in Red Dead 3 would not work, and yet there are also people complaining that Jack did not feel as an interesting character because there was next to do nothing to do at him at the end of Red Dead 1 after killing Ross.
because they are not thinking about reality probably. by the time jack grows up to be a man it's ww1. the world will have become too advanced by this point for it to even be a western genre anymore with machine guns and tanks roaming around aint nobody shooting cattleman revolvers anymore. it would more likely transform into the gangster genre. Hanging out with john dillinger or something haha. but ya no more jack please. stick to the western time period is a must. personally i think one more story with red harlow would be nice with modern technology to power it.
DLC where you work on the Ferry as the girl Dutch shoots except you do not know it is her till you see the flash in your face from Dutch pulling the trigger.
What if the main character is killed by Arthur at the end?
That is amazing plot twist
Damn that's good, but No, arthur is a good guy, with the "REDEMPTION" theme, it would not work. It will make RDR2 looks weird though.
@@brangtoggez6363Bro, redemption only happens in chapter 5-6
Little nightmares ahh
@@brangtoggez6363 Bro Arthur killed a lot of people
I really hope that it’s not another prequel involving any of the Van Der Linde gang members. It would feel like filler and there would be no redemption story to be told but somehow people don’t understand that.
Fully agree, the next game needs a new story that can support itself without having to rely on already established characters. We all love the current story but it’s run its course and people need to come to terms with that
I do think it could be cool if there were a couple missions or events where you had run ins with certain members of the van der Linde gang, or could witness the impact they had on the west, but rdr3 needs its own focal point with a new protagonist, new characters, and new story
@@mustardtiger6062 the whole idea crumbles when you think about it
A uncle prequel story before the gang in the prime of Wild West sounds like a good game to me it a lot to unfold with uncle past because we don’t even know his real name so rockstar can have a fresh slate and do whatever they want with a younger uncle because he didn’t fall in the gang until he was older
Agreed. Also people wanting it to end in the Blackwater massacre make no sense, it would not work at all because how would there be an epilogue/post-game free roam? That heist took place literally right before chapter 1 of RDR2 so there’s really nothing you can do there. Also the obsession with Blackwater is crazy. IMO it’s better left a mystery. We already know enough to infer what happened anyways.
Crazy that the guy who played as Eagle Flies is the same guy Gus killed with the box cutter in Breaking Bad. Was watching Dark Winds and immediately recognized him from BB but when he would talk he delivers his lines EXACTLY line Eagle Flies. Looked him up and yep, same guy, Jeremiah Bitsui
I feel like a game with a character like Red Harlow would be cool still an outlaw but in the end doing the right thing
Give us a hardcore mode. My biggest criticism in Red Dead is that they force certain mechanics that are majorly tedious (Eating, drinking and no fast travel) in order to add realism but the minute you get into a fire fight it's the easiest combat in gaming whilst you can take 100 bullets without dying
Finally somebody who says it, I love rdr2 story but damn the gameplay felt so easy (gunfight-wise only), I literally never used any health tonic or whatever they are called hahaha, u know those that puts your health bar and hearth golden? U just took cover and start aiming and shooting carelessly and that was it hahaha so easy
@@sssesssarsssturn off auto aim and the map it makes the fire fights way more tense and exciting like riding your horse then bounty hunters find you and ambush you some of the best gun fights I had
rdr1 goty has hardcore its fun
@chrisoctober9921 The problem with this is you are fully aware that you are making the game harder for yourself just because. I won't ever mess with options just to make the game harder, that's what modes are for. It's like turning the Crosshairs off on FPS's when the game is designed to have crosshairs
I agree
I don't get the whole we can't play as that guy because we know he is going to die. Arthur was obviously going to die in Red Dead 2
I think the difference we didn't know anything about Arthur. He was a mystery.
you dont know arthur is going to die until far into the playthrough though, yeah he wasn't in rd1 but that doesn't mean his death was predictable like it would be for other characters
One thing I've never seen mentioned is that we could play as Micah's brother, who's mentioned to have gone straight in a letter he sent to Micah (You can find it in camp during Shady Belle at the place you go talk to Strauss for the money lending and other sins V i believe?), it implies that Micah ran with his brother for a while, but said brother (I think his name was Amos) feels bad about his outlaw days with micah and tries to be a better man. The story could be like their outlaw days (but that'd be too cliche right?) so i think do something like RDR2 where Amos and Micah split up at the beginning of the game, with a failed heist or micah thinking Amos betrayed him so he decides to run before Micah kills him, and eventually at the end, we can see Amos with his family. Maybe at the end he could get gunned down by the law for running with micah? that's a lot of parallels though.
And, that letter kind of hinted that Micah is a rapist
i think you struck gold
Could this same brother be gunned down by Micah during the time skip of 1899-1907 after Micah gains his own gang
That ending should be different, wayyy to similar to rdr1 ending
20:32
What would go amazingly as an Easter egg to the second game was if like, as your a native American you could be on a mission where your tracking down an outlaw that did something yo you ect, and you've been out in the wild for days straight without food when your struck by a snake, no medicine, and right when you think your fate will end, arthur morgan rides past and asks why your inna Bush randomly, upon discovery sucks the venom out and gives you a few days worth of food, what could be such a life or death situation for your character? Could be made to seem like just a 'random encounter' for arthur like he gets alot in the second game (bear traps, snake bites, poisoned people ect)
Just seeing the way itd slot together perfectly and still be a little easter egg to "Arthur's redemption" would be orgasm worthy...
Bro what 💀
@@El_Vaquero1911it would be orgasm worthy
@@El_Vaquero1911 it makes sense? Whats your point 😂
this would be awesome!
@@El_Vaquero1911 it would be organic worthy
My proposition for Red Dead 3: We get to play as either Dutch's father or someone close to him. All we know about Dutch's father is that he died in the Civil War, which means the way he dies and the timing of his death can be left to creative decision. The great thing about Dutch's is that he doesn't even yet have a name, and if he were a cowboy, it would have been just before the "prime" of cowboys. My idea is that it can take inspiration from both games. He would be a family man to Dutch and Greta, while also being on the run from the government. Perhaps he was the leader of his gang, a charming one similar to Dutch, however his gang is starting to flourish because the golden age for the cowboy is coming up. All of a sudden the government shows up like the pinkertons in rdr2 and tell him that he is drafted. His response is killing the government men however one escapes and informs his superiors starting this great chase like Dutch and the Pinkertons in Rdr2. The chase then causes many members (who can be literally anyone because there's no real information from this period) to die and it makes Dutch's father realize he must sacrifice himself and surrender to the government to join the army and fight in the Civil War for whichever side he's on (that information is up for creative decision because all we know is he at some point lived in Philadelphia). He could even have a cinematic death similar to Arthur as the specifics aren't yet known. We could also have an epilogue using this format where we play as Dutch and it can show the roots of the Van der Linde game like him meeting Arthur and Hosea and Grimshaw. I know it's complex but that's just my general idea for a Red Dead Redemption III that doesn't recycle a bunch of known characters and introduces a fresh time period
Play as young javier in revolutionary mexico, game ends as he first joins and integrates with the van der lin gang
Game about colm O'Driscoll's brother would be perfect, you finally get to explore the real wild west at its prime, it actually has some connection to the var der linde gang, and it follows the rdr rule that the main character die at the end (by dutch)
Or play as him after rdr2 and it ends when John finds you
@@MRBass6000I like to think Colm's brother would die in a heroic way like Arthur's maybe Colm's brother would be like Hosea and a less evil version of Colm
tbh it would be interesting but still wont feel like rdr2 bc this one is so good bc of the camp interactions imo. For me it was bind blowing how included i felt and it wasnt like any other game with 2 line npcs. You actually feel the camp alive. I spent hours and hours just wandering in camp and you cant rlly get that feeling playing a solo character.
Boring
The Wild West has many stories that can be made. I think a whole new story should be made
@haydenrhead7692
I think that’s an option but not until you do a game on the early gang.
Exactly what I said, leave these characters alone.
@@jamskinnerI personally don’t agree. They finished their story and we learn a lot from both 1&2. I’d rather get a game with all new characters. There could be references to the VLD but their story is finished
What’s with that tank 3:40 😂😂😂
It’s a player model change lol
I dislike the young Arthur theory or Landon theory because where is the redemption there they always forget it’s a story about redemption and in my opinion I think the main characters in a series like this should die
A game about Landon would be great because
1. he did have redemption by leaving the United States
2. he dies
3. we dont know much about him so it leaves a lot of room for lore
4. some people think Arthur is a better gunslinger than Landon ricketts so it would shut them up
@@ant_178 no shit he dies. Seriously. I thought he was gonna see the world crumble to dust and blow away
@@Heisen_burger-dude I mean he could die in game dumbass and not just in a newspaper
Finally, someone With a brain
Opening scene of landon and a mentor of his. Mentor killed. Landon then takes up teaching a protoge (player character) who is a young everyman but wants to be a gunfighter. Landon gets his revenge, Character dies, epilogue landon avenges his protoge getting revenge again and then ends in chuparosa 1902 boom not very hard
What if in the traitor theory, he learns later in the game that the black water heist is a setup of sorts and tries to say it is, however, he’s killed because they believe he wants to stop the gang from getting a big score?
That would be great but without them talking much about it in rdr2 it would feel like an odd setting.
@@edwardsiggies2680 I mean they didn’t talk much about Arthur *because it was a while ago* so I feel as if they could pull the same magic for this idea
Or have it set 2-3 years prior to the blackwater massacre.
That Traitor likely got killed way before Blackwater, cause Tilly didn’t knew about him Arthur had to tell her, so that doesn’t make sense
Rockstar should make a more modernized game where you can play as a gangster. It’d be cool to have multiple main characters too like one would be an ex bank robber who has a family and gets back into the life of robbing and maybe another main character that’s crazy or something we could call him Trevor or something idk I think that would be cool
Good idea bro they could add like a street level gangster too and call him Franklin
Idk if that would sell. What are you saying, there should be cars instead of horses and the game should have 3 protagonists set in a fictionalized version of LA?
This is my personal pick for the next RDR game. I’ve commented this in other videos, so some people could have seen this already. Keep in mind I am not a professional story writer, nor do I work for rockstar. This story of mine is really interesting to me, so I want to share it with others. Above my actual story, I think my setting is probably what they should go with.
TLDR: Game set at the end of the Civil War, including an ex confederate soldier first protagonist, and a freed slave second protagonist. Game is focused around redemption of character and morality questions.
I’ve said this for years the Van Der Linde Gang story should be over. There’s no way games before or after make sense. I think a game set in the last months to the end of the Civil War would be amazing. New cast of characters, possibly a soldier who has to redeem himself. The time period is a perfect balance between civilized cities and completely untamed frontiers. As a history nerd, the political landscape at the time would be so interesting to me. I think the best way to go with it would be to play as an ex confederate soldier, someone who deserted. You’re marked for death by the confederacy, the Union, and confederate loyalists after the war ends. This could set up areas of the map which are more or less hostile. As well as having ample unique antagonists. A fictional Washington DC and Richmond would be amazing. The dichotomy between the two cities would be so cool to see. Maybe the protagonist was forced to take part in a massacre and tries to redeem himself by doing good acts through criminal means. Having to always question his morality and ethicality. You would meet various characters that you run with or do missions for, sort of like RDR1, but this time you’re hunted. I eventually think this character would have to die, like prior games. The question for who the second protagonist should be is up for debate, but I think a freed slave would be the best choice. Maybe freed by our character, freed by himself, or as a result of the war. This ex slave would have to be integral to the story, so having him run with our ex solider would be essential. They would most likely meet in a hostile interaction but realize they need each other. Being on almost complete separate isles of this conflict, but both are wanted men. Mutual respect would go a long way between the two. Eventually, our second protagonist would avenge the first. There’s a lot of places our second character could go, so I will leave that up to you. Maybe a US Marshall like the real life Bass Reeves, a farmer, living off the grid, or living in plain sight in a city. Although our second protagonist should start a family and name his kid after our first character. Our characters would be motivated to be free from conflict, live on their own terms, and secure a future for themselves.
I think R* would have to be very careful with this to not be historically inaccurate. They also would need to be extremely careful to not portray the Union as an antagonist. I wouldn’t want this to be a pro confederate, anti union game. Along with that, I don’t think portraying the Union as a bastion of good and the confederacy the epitome of evil would be good either. They also would need to portray battles with respect for the people who fought in them. I recognize that playing as an ex confederate could be controversial, so nuance would be crucial. Our character wouldn’t be a confederate ideologue, probably just a poor solider who was drafted to fight. For these reasons, I am not sure how likely R* would be willing to make this game, but they can pull it off. If done right, this story would be amazing for media in general, not just video games.
There’s many more things that I can elaborate on, but this is just a simple outline of the story. People have brought ideas to me ranging from our second protagonist being in an African confederate unit, seeing early lemoyne raiders, Dutch’s dad, and more. Feel free to reply with more suggestions.
Yeah, I think a Post Civil War or Reconstruction game could be really interesting, but imo I think the game should focus more on the West Coast area where the wild west really sprung up.
Idk tho because I just feel like that's not what read dead is about and I feel like the van Der linde gang really made read dead what it is everybody thinks of Dutch and the gang when they hear the words read dead redemption and sometimes I feel like maybe they shouldn't even continue the series because of how perfect read dead 2 was and how it ended it just wouldn't feel right to make an entirely new storyline with different characters after all we've been through with the van Der linde gang (imo)
@@Aids9898 I agree, I don’t think we need to call it Red Dead Redemption 3 for that reason. Just name it Red Dead Reconstruction, or any word that starts with R to keep the theme for the title. We had Red Dead Revolver, which wasn’t related to RDR1 and RDR2. I just think that the RDR story with Dutch and the gang is done, anything more would either be entirely unnecessary or just lack substance. The Red Dead games are a gold mine for rockstar (no pun intended) and I don’t see them stopping Wild West games anytime soon. RDR2 brought the series to new heights, they’re going to want to capitalize on it.
At first I wasn't entirely sold on your idea but the more I read it, the more I got excited for a game like that. Could be really interesting to see, since I can't think of any games off the top of my head that are set in that time period, at least not open world games like RDR.
@@matthewcioffi6385 exactly! I think this would probably be the first AAA game that is set in the American Civil War. At least that I know of. It’s a time period that is still very important to learn from. In RDR2 they referenced it a lot, so I think they may actually go with it. Thank you!
i think red dead 3 should have the protagonist be black belle. she was a legendary gunslinger that was deemed " too dangerous" to approach in the in game quest and her story has an obscure end where she literally just rides away from you.
I think that would be cool! To see her in her prime and in the colter Tobin gang
Yeah but he already know she at least lives which makes it not fun like with no stakes no one gives a shit
I don’t want to play with a female protagonist. I know that’s sexist and wrong, but I just want to play as a cowboy just like in the movies
@neon_turtle oh so you wanna look at big burly men when you play games? ;)
@@dogwithabeanie woman can be badass too, you Bigot
Hey, what if we get a red dead revolver two instead of red dead redemption three
I really hope rdr3 is a new story with a new character/gang not everything needs to be connected to the van der linde story as it’s a story that is finished
I think there should be some references to the VDL gang no matter what, but yeah I would also like new characters basically no matter what.
@@RedDeadTierListswhat if the main character is killed by Arthur at the end
@@RedDeadTierListswhy don’t they just remaster red dead 1
Arthur at some point mentioned when I think talking to Tilly about someone who died in camp who was a traitor. But it was probably some kind of joke on the rule about no spilling blood in camp.
The problem with making a RDR3 is that there’s nothing more to do with the Dutch Van Der Linde gang and its members, but making the third installment not about them will turn everyone off because it’s all anyone knows. Playing a game that you know has the same name as the first 2 means you’re only there because of them, so a game that has nothing or very little to do with the first game will turn all the original fans away, and being a third installment will mean no new players will be so willing to come. I think it’s best to end the series with RDR2, there’s just nothing else to do with it. It’s not a GTA series.
The problem is that Red Dead REDEMPTION 2 even exists. They should've followed suit with the first two games (Revolver & Redemption) and had a new name that started with "R"
Redemption 2 could've easily have been disconnected from the Van Der Linde gang entirely and been about the new characters they made. Image a Red Dead "Revenge" story about Sadie Adler seeking vengeance on the O'Driscol gang, for example
@@MaleficMurph yo that could’ve been an amazing idea,
It’d be lit if we could play landon rickets
Landon Rickettes would be fire, I just think having the main character being one of his gang members would be much more interesting. Maybe playing as Landon in the epilogue would be cool tho.
@@RedDeadTierLists yeah I’d say something along those lines and maybe the epilogue is the shootout he was apparently at in blackwater or we could have said gang member leave somehow be it death or just quitting
I’m surprised he didn’t mention,back of my mind while watching the video I was just wondering when he would talk about him
But we know his fate too so idk if it would work🤔 but then again it's rockstar
@@brandeiii u right my be forgot abt that ngl
Playing as a Native American in the western expansion would be dope af. Like right before or during the civil war
Defeats the purpose of a Western
@@RyanG0899how, native americans were very present during the wild west and played an integral role in daily life among settlers. i think natives often arent given proper representation either which would give rockstar a good opportunity to shine. just because we arent playing as a “cowboy” doesn’t necessarily mean it isnt western
@@RyanG0899 cowboy isn't the only thing apart of the west boah
Gotta agree with Symin there is plenty of ground to cover with natives and settlers. Both good and bad and I mean shown from both sides. No stupid agendas trying to portray one or the other as the "good guys" as history tends to teach things typically aren't black and white. Same goes for this topic.
@@syrnin Cowboy Native. That would be badass. A revolver in one hand and a tomahawk in the other.
My first idea was play as Colms brother. We saw the end of the gang, the aftermath of the gang, why not the formation of the gang. You play as the brother when they all still were working together. See a younger Dutch and Hosea, a very young author around the gang camps like Jack, and when the final fights happens, you then take over a 18 to 19 year old author for the prolog.
20:36 Imagine rdr 3 as a native gunslinger in the peak of the wild west as you said. Maybe kind of early into the game after the prologue. And you ride in to this big western town in the desert and the native you play as discovers the white civilisation, and of the way the whites act. And one of the first sights you see as the character you play as is a brawl going on, maybe a bar fight or a duel on the street. And then after the brawl you see that the person who won the fight was Arthur in his wildest days when he was young and cocky. Would be a nice cameo and a cool way to start of an epic story for the native gunslinger.
For me it would bring some Connor vibes from ac 3 when he discovers the city of Boston for the first time with Achilles
Oregon trail style intro, then playing as one of three outlaws: white, Mexican /Murrieta type, or Indian..taking place between 1840-60.
At the end, you have a Chile shown, which could be a VDL Gang member
Implying players wouldn’t want to see the black water massacre is CRAZY
i'm late but it's not really crazy lol. sometimes in literature it's more powerful to leave things to the imagination, not everything has to be shown
@@Hundo_B Thank you.
We know 3 things about the Traitor
They were a traitor
They were killed in camp
They joined and died before tilly joined
The only way to know we play as the traitor is if rockstar said "oh yeah btw you play as the traitor".
The second game introduced new characters that died off characters that weren't even mentioned in rdr1 so how come rdr3 can't do that.
I can not try to agree that a traitor game wouldn't work. Also theres a trend in the franchise
Rdr1 is about the post gang and pretty much post wild west and rdr2 focuses on the end of the gang and wild west so why cant rdr3 be about the prime of the gang and wild west honestly they probably could do a similar thing for an rdr4 the birth of the gang and birth of the prime of the wild west becuase you cant view the birth of the wild west and the gang at the same time.
This idea is bad and crumbles when you think about it
@@laurie550 why? Is it just not possible to explain things before throwing out a take like you blurted out a point with no damn explanation and evidence to you're take
Before rdr2 the gang had only been in West Elizabeth and New Austin so the map would be even smaller then rdr2s map and there is no way to counter this point the map is way smaller among other reasons
@@Envixin753 is this not a solid point
@@laurie550 there's more west than new Austin they will just do what they did in rdr2 introduce an entire new area to the map and then after you beat the game unlock rdr1 2 and 3s maps together its not that complicated
RDR3 Should in my opinion:
Be set during 1865-1882
Follow a New Cast
Have a few Cameos from RDR1 and RDR2 Characters
Have some of the RDR2 Map, maybe just New Austin and West Elizabeth, with the rest being brand new.
And leave the door open for RDR4, and Finally, It Must Have a Good Online. RDO2 Can't be as bad as RDO Was
hell nah. rd4 is too far. even the debatability of what rdr3 should be about might be too far. I think it should be about the gang tho because it's always been the story of the gang. in 1 you pick off the remnants of the gang, in 2 you see the gangs downfall, 3 only makes sense you see the gangs uprising and in their prime
@@datguy8460 The van der Linde Gangs Story I'd Done. I hate to say this, but we know too much for a RDR3 Prequel, amd no one can get their red dead Redemption. What else is there to tell. And the RDR4 Thing yeah that's kinda dumb but TakeTwo and R* need that Money, Boah
@@TheSoapontheWii360 "know too much" damn that's such a lame way of experiencing these stories. especially since we've literally only seen the end of it. would it really be such a big problem if we just saw situations or locations they described and even new minor characters or obstacles? apparently the gang has been all across the country across a 20 year timespan yet we just see the end of the story. was the star wars prequel trilogy ruined because we "knew too much" like who exactly was going to rule the entire galaxy?
@@datguy8460 Look, We Know that nothing too important is going to happen, because why wasn't it mentioned in the second game. I Wish we had a new prequel with Arthur, John, Dutch, and the others, I Don't Think It Will Work. No one seen in RDR2 and RDR1 Will Die, and if someone new is there, they either have to die or Lesve the Gang, but then again why weren't they mentioned in RDR2?
@@TheSoapontheWii360 who cares? not every story hasnt to have an arch to it nor have major new characters. that's why I say minor characters or obstacles. some that an 18 year old arthur, dutch and hosea would deal with and then forget 15 years later. it's such a large time span, anyone and anything could happen that they could forget or don't mention. there could be a dozen more gang members we didn't see. def more heists we didn't see. this series has gone too far to be about anything other than the van der linde gang that it seems the only sensible option would be to go back. otherwise it would feel like a completely different game picking a new set of characters
9:14 dont you forget when the red dead 2 trailers came out, nobody wanted to play as arthur and we all wanted John.
Honestly the best option would be a game set either in the 50’s-60’s or in the 70’s-80’s with a new story. Maybe a little mission that feature Dutch and Hosea teaming up or trying to scam the protagonist for fan service
Horrible idea
what kind of western story takes place in the 70's-80's
@@e-1074 1860s and 1870s. Besides there are many westerns that do that. No Country for Old Men is considered one. I'm not a huge fan of the idea though since I don't really want the Ven Der Linde gang back. Their story is over
Low-key I don't think there should be an rdr3 , the community is soo split on ideas for THEIR own satisfaction and it's a lose lose situation for rockstar, we need a prime theme or at least a main timeline
I think if it’s done well enough it will win people over but yeah, very divided right now
@@mustardtiger6062 fr. The only way they can fill everyone's needs is with one story and a gazillion dlc's
As much as I love the series, I agree. I’m confident that there will be a new Red Dead game but I feel like the redemption/Van der linde story is over.
@@cindyxrdz what we need is to decide a TIMELINE first then start thinking on what it could be, because a lot of words start with R and that could be a clever sweep 4 rockstar but once we decide a timeline we think, cuz rdr3 is a big project 4 r*
No its not
Hot take: you play as the leader of a gang that’s not ever heard of and you have to manage it by manipulating the members or doing something good and people would leave or join depending on the status of your gang
Playing as a cop would just feel more like an LA Noire sequel to me. And to be honest if Rockstar did make another Noire game I think late victorian era London would be the best setting. Imagine trying to solve Jack the Ripper's case.
Secondly: I think we should have a remake of Red Dead Revolver. I played it way back when and as objectively subpar as it is the game had a LOT of potential and it stood on strong legs because it was strongly influenced by spaghetti westerns.
I think it could be like a new york or london officer that goes undercover as a mafia
I believe rdr3 should be as Mac but it shouldn’t start in black water. They should do about 5-6 chapters in different towns in a Different map then the last chapter could be black water or either black water epilogue
I think the game should end when they're about to rob Blackwater.
@@cristinaelizabethkraat1569that’s absolutely genius
Imagine if you could play as colm'o driscoll
"You fell off"
Brother he got 13k subs, he's still a growing boy 💀
Idk why that dude is saying that as this is literally my best performing video in the last 10.
@@RedDeadTierListsit’s a trend where you comment within the first few minutes of a video and say that, I see that in every video I watch
@@Skeleton52925 Yeah I've noticed that too, even on Instagram and whatnot
Imo. I think it should be Jack. He chose revenge just like John did. In this franchise our protagonist deal with “actions have consequences” and in the case of John especially revenge really was a fool game.
So I would be completely open picking up right where we left off in 1914 with Jack and tell the story of him going on the run for being suspected of killing Edgar Ross. 1 last old west story.
World War I is a non-issue. Rdr1 ends in 1914 but America doesn’t join the war until April 1917. But regardless the entire war from start to finish was never once fought on American soil. So you can easily just leave the war as something that’s only mentioned in newspapers or by npc’s.
I could see a story for Jack with him killing some government people that helped kill his dad.
I like it ending with that more than that being a beginning. The old West Dies, Jack finished the story for the gang and John. Times are changed at that point not changing. If you think about it, the end of RDR1 is like leading into the age of GTA. Cars are invented at that point. So to me 1880-1899 has to be the timeframe. If you set it like 5-6 years before RDR2 maybe there is a perfect Easter egg for your character to meet a Pregnant Woman who mentions she likes the name "Jack".
But Jack’s story is left ambiguous for a reason. He looks at his gun SYMBOLICALLY, knowing he’ll have to use it again. It’s the cycle of violence that Arthur and John tried to keep him from, but ironically he doesn’t end up breaking. We don’t need Jack.
@@tblcyek I mean I understand that pov. But we didn’t really even need the prequel especially focusing on brand new guy that we’ve never seen or heard of until RDR 2. Rdr could’ve easily been a 1 and done storyline. I’m definitely open to a Jack game in the end of the day assuming they don’t kill him, leave him in prison or severely disabled as his ending.
@ We need new characters, since the VDL gangs story has been told to near completion, anything else is filler.
Landon Ricketts actually did end up dying, idk why im mentioning it but I was playing rdr1 recently and when you become jack you can see his death in the newspaper
The difficulty of coming up with a good story for RDR2 is shown here so its easy to say RDR2 would and should be the last RDR game.
Also, have to give it to you. People just spew out their ideas they formed in their heads without giving them a single thought about implications and how they would work, and you seems to be the only person so far i've seen that rejected all these dumb theories bcz they actually wouldn't work in the grand scheme of things.
Would be interesting to maybe play as the Jack Hall gang. They’re mentioned in a campfire song and also you can find the treasure maps. Set it in the 1870’s-80’s and it would be its own thing.
2:27 never say charles got john to safety again that was Arthur smh
i feel like another story around the vdl gang wouldn’t be good cuz u already know about the gangs outcome at the end
didnt we already know their outcome since rdr1? bc even while knowing what happened to them, rdr2 was still great
@@danthemonkeyman3 we know about 3 of them, the gang has many more charachters as we saw in rdr2
It makes sense for the 3rd installment of red dead redemption to take place before rdr2, like before the black water heist, it only makes sense because the games are kind of going backwards, rdr1 is after rdr2, and rdr3 would be before rdr2 and we would finally get a closing to the series knowing all the lore and stuff
My thoughts are that it would be kind of cool to add a red dead redemption game based on both the start of the game and the start of the mafia (adding the title, and adding it to the series of red dead redemption) but for the sole purpose of just having something to do or be interesting or fun not necessarily be a main game, like somethings that have not to perfect but specifically for red dead redemption three they have to perfect it
There needs to be an Australian red dead, playing as Ned Kelly
What if you play as Landon Rickets? His story wouldn’t be to hard to figure out his story he is based on a real sheriff but I don’t know. his story is very famous he took down some of the most infamous outlaws of the Wild West pretty much by himself
He’s based off Wyatt Earp. He took down three of the most famous gunslingers by himself outside the OK corral
I think that would work but like you said the story is already there. Maybe a spinoff?
Developing a Red Dead Redemption 3 presents a unique challenge, particularly because we have a substantial amount of information about characters associated with Dutch. This background could potentially restrict the opportunities for a compelling narrative. To preserve the essence of the series, it may be beneficial to explore fresh storylines instead of continuing one that feels complete.
It's worth noting that the Red Dead series began with 2004’s Red Dead Revolver, where players assume the role of bounty hunter Red Harlow. A promising direction for the series could be to create a game titled Red Dead Revolver 2, or a variation like Red Dead Revolver: [add subtitle here]. This approach would allow us to further explore Red Harlow’s story and the world of the Red Dead series, taking place after the events of the original game. Such a direction could invigorate the universe and provide a richer narrative experience.
its going to be the guy john killed when he was a kid
Bro what 💀💀💀 you better be joking lol💀
Mac Callander RD3
@@stormmist3634 sorry bro am not
I think a Lyle Morgan game should be heavily considered, or at least someone who ran with him in a gang or something. Lyle could’ve been a terrible man at first, beating or abusing his child at least mentally, doing bad things, but as he sees his grow and he realizes all the bad he’s done then he finally does something good which maybe saves Arthur, which is why he keeps his hat, and it leads to Lyle being executed. Then maybe we play as Arthur. We have to consider that when thinking about a story as well, because so far both games you’ve played as a new character at the end. But also playing as a member of the gang is a good way of getting close, but not too close to Arthur and his father and seeing those bad things. The game be about that person seeing Lyle die, realizing all their bad they’ve done together or something. And it would work well with letting us play as Arthur at the end, which could also time jump to when he’s a young adult and just falling in with Dutch and Hosea. And now we have the origin story of the gang. Just like we got the origin story of John Marston, and Beechers hope.
And Indian turned gunslinger would be cool
You could play as colms brother
No💀💀
Mac Callander RD3
Your random AF clips using mods are the best 😂😂
What is lenny survived bc he was twitching after he was shot
Rdr3 should have a new protagonist new map just like every new gta end of discussion...
I actually think the Lyle Morgan idea could be really intriguing if it was spun kinda like the breaking bad type father doing unethical things to provide for his family. Kinda like how at the end Walt Jr. hated walter you could frame it as Lyle actually cared about his son but arthur never found out/ only saw his bad side.
The first game is set in 1911 3 would most certainly have to be a prequel since the west becomes more modern like the east after 1911
I think you should play as mac or davey Callander because since you know there gonna die at the end of the game it would be hard to get attached to them like you do with Arthur and John so the story would have to go above and beyond to make that happen
That’s exactly the kind of story I thought would work best for rdr3
This is a horrible idea
what would be the redemption story exactlt
Bro Jack is not Italian he can’t join the mafia
Well they can figure a way to have him join he's not Italian but he's a good shot
@@dominicstclairstudios6324that’s not how it works in the mob.
@@AlienX-dw9sz were talking about fictional video game
@@dominicstclairstudios6324 doesn’t matter, it doesn’t make any sense. Their parent company makes the mafia series with great accuracy they won’t ruin it for a game that doesn’t check out. Thank god you aren’t in a position to give ideas.
@@AlienX-dw9sz let's see them hire you🤣
they should just make a new story and new characters and set it in the peak of the wild west this time.
I just want the next Red Dead game to be about different characters entirely, i feel like the RDR series is good as is, and it doesn't need another addition.
I 100% agree. It should be treated as a more historical version of GTA. Every GTA mainline game is a completely different story with different characters in different places.
I still really like the idea of RDR3 continuing the story of Jack as becomes a writer while trying to finally leave his old life behind and with the ending having him break the cycle where instead of dying like Arthur and John he’s the one that gets out completely and lives the rest of his life in peace. I definitely don’t think it should be a WW1 or Mafia game cause it goes against the themes and setting of the series imo.
but how interesting would that be
There should be no red dead redemption 3 there cant be unless ur creating a whole new story van der linde gang can not be in it at all for it to be good.
The people who's saying "you fell off" is just missing the whole fucking point.
I think playing as Colm o’driscall would be sick like learning his pov on the van der linde gang and his hatred with Dutch and all he went through during rdr2
Bro the story would be unrealistic tho considering how big of an army Colm O’driscoll has
Playing as Charles when he was younger would be sweet cause in the beginning of the story he was doing stuff alone but he didn’t really talk about what he did
Arthur is actually mentioned in rdr1 when john walks by the church that arthur helped fund in rdr2
Bro what?😂
It wasn't a church it was a homeless shelter and it was in rdr2 itself
The prologue should be a short few missions as a very young Arthur or John then transition to you being Mac Callander playing the glory years of the gang with the epilogue taking a small time skip and ending with the blackwater massacre and Mac being killed by Milton
I don't really think the glory years of the gang would be easy to tell a story that fits in the Red Dead dynamic because the other two games have been full on tragedies.
@@RedDeadTierLists the tragedy is the ending. You see how good the gang had it going
No offence but this is a terrible idea
Other than the prologue I really like the idea
@@RedDeadTierListsI definitely think they should do Mac I wanna see how skilled he was and he also sacrificed himself for Arthur and the gang to escape
And this takes place after Arthur death where Micah walks away and then you get to play as him and do what everything he did while he was gone until the very end where he dies, and you have to go back to two kill Micah
I think a rdr3 about the o Driscoll gang would be cool
Maybe Colm's brother, We know little about him, Maybe we play as him like John and Arthur and then he is killed by dutch so then it switch to colm like Jack and John, where Colm revenge against dutch by killing Anabelle or something.
id go with before they and Dutch were enemies, and the epilogue would be the blackwater incident
It would be more cool with some native american like Apache or Plains indians
I feel like Charles would be a good game if like he gets his family and then either they die or they get taken and be has to find them or get revenge
It’s already been hinted at that Mac and Davey are the protagonists of the third game. I mean it’s like the first character that they show when we start RDRII. They talk about them constantly in the camp. It’s like they wrote them in with the intention of re playing RDR2 after you finish RDR3. But what I would like them to do is let us play as the Calloway brothers, Arthur and John just like GTA.
I want to play as arthurs dad and in the epiloge the young arthur who is about to join the van der line gang
My idea is a DLC
I call it RED DEAD Asian, it pretty much takes place in Lemoyne in 1875 when the Lemoyne Raiders where more than just a Nuisance. There a gang that's Pretty much different than any other gang in RDR2 there trained by Army soldiers and In my opinion they Ambush the player better than any other gang in the game in My opinion You play as a Asian Character his Parents move to America for a better life and his father joined in the civil war to fight against the confederacy To get citizenship After the war the father came home but the house was attacked by confederate soldiers Because the father stole documents that can reveal Spies among the union Years later The son Has those documents And wants revenge on the Lemoyne Raiders for killing his mother and scaring his face when he was 11 The comedic relief character is a man named ralph L. Dalton AKA the Gun store owner in valentine
Sadie, or Charles story could work since after RDR2 finishes Sadie heads off down to South and Central America and Charles heads up to Canada. RDR3 could be about Sadie's adventures into Mexico or further down into South America and her meeting with Charels and such. OR there could be a story about Charles and his adventure up to Canada and finding a Wife there and having a child at the end of the game.
You know how John is against Dutch in the first game than in the second game you play when John was in he’s Dutch gang, what about something similar but you play as Colm ol’drisco being tighter with Dutch and tell their story, you know.
This might be too much of a departure but the dust bowl could be an interesting setting. There were a bunch of interesting outlaws that popped up during that time. Ma Baker, John Dillinger Bonnie and Clyde.
you say about how its bad we already know the fate of mac but we knew the fate of arthur if you played rdr1 since he didnt appear or was mentioned. imo if we are continuing the gangs story playing as mac it would make sense since some dialogue from bill says that mac wasnt a good man but he wasnt all bad which sets up a honor system
Hot take there shouldn't be an rdr 3
Honestly what i was thinking. Rdr was set a weird time to want to continue. Other than making prequels which they already did theres not much
I think they should make Red Dead Revolver 2 we need a modern Wild West game
@ToBy11334 yea, that would be better
I mean RDR3 would be tough but there will for sure be a continuation of the Red Dead series somehow.
@RedDeadTierLists Yeah, but it would feel weird having a whole new cast of characters. I mean, GTA does that, but Red dead redemption Is a connected story it'll just be weird
Maybe Dutch was in a gang before he created one with Hosea and that was the Legendary Gunslinger’s Gang, except this gunslinger is a Native. It would explain why Dutch has such sympathy for the natives and people of color. Granted he manipulates these people, but he did the same with Arthur so it isn’t discriminatory.
I think it would be cool if this guy humbled Dutch in some way, showing him what it takes to be an outlaw and run a gang.
The ending if low honor high honor could be the protagonist choosing to defend other natives or dying with the gang. This leaves us some options and doesn’t necessarily spoil us with a death.
another important thing to note is that unless they change two redemption to something else like they did from revolver the character needs a redemption arc or something
I would See for rdr3 to Play as i dont know an Outlaw in the golden age of the Wild West.
Play as young author, dutch and Hosea like GTA 5 missions were you can play as all 3 before the blackwater tragedy and your final mission is the blackwater incident before going into rdd2
The new proteganist must be Jack John son and must be a a sequal to rdr1 as rdr2 was prequel