Want video and photo content that grabs attention and drives views? 🎥🔥 Order your custom videos from us today and watch your brand soar! Check the bio 🔗
This content is absolute trash. Talking about commons sense like it's some kind of astounding discovery that nobody is aware of, is fuct. Get thw fuck outta here. This guy needs to get a different job Maybe teach preschool. Or somewhere that his information will be new to the people he's trying to reach. This is so fucking lame
@@booknerd9691so was the entire video, and every other video posted by this person. Posting common sense information and acting like it's profound wisdom that nobody is aware of is fucking garbage
I mean, this guy sounds legit smart as he's on stage with a mic and easy to listen to and got the science music in the background but... consider what he said lmfao "TVs are actually designed for Humans" .... almost like yknow, humans invented the TV for humans... THAT'S THE POINT OF A TV dumbass.
I would say “come here, sit down. Lets have a chat mate. Now you are cute and thats not to be discredited, however i feed you, i house you, bathe you, and all you do is turn perfectly good food into shit. Now my television might not be to your standard and ill take that on board, but in future if you could approach the issue with a solution rather than just negativity that you be appreciated. You are a good boy though”
@@Mazhypic it's a bit different, brown is darker shade of orange which still in the spectrum.. The "purple doesn't exist" is because it doesn't make sense in color addition mixing.. you mix red and green, you get yellow (yellow spectrum is between red and green).. you mix green and blue, you get cyan (cyan spectrum is between green and blue).. but when you mix red and blue, you get magenta or purple if darker yet in the spectrum between red and blue is green.. What similar to purple is black-grey-white, colors that our brain made up from multiple spectrums..
@@kurniaprimaputra1313 Well violet is still in the spectrum, just not between red and blue, but the point is both are illusions and doesn't "exist" but of course they still do, because we can see them.
@@mu6qy I understand, but explain to me why his videos first showed up, and all the other crap I'm not interested in, even when I haven't watched a video it will appear on my home page and keep reappearing. Clearly, I'm not interested, but the algorithm keeps pushing it. SO, they have an algorithm that pushes crap.
Yes please!! That's exactly what I thought of. Pets obsess over critters and birds on the TV screens, so what are they actually seeing Mr Smarty Pants!? 😅
they can still see images of what the tv is trying to produce, but because the cones in their eyes are different then ours they see the light as different colours, making it so they can still make out objects, but they just look like the animal is tripping fucking balls
lol and he said tv’s have millions of billions of photons. That means atleast 2,000,000,000,000,000 pixels. An HD TV has 1080x1920 pixels, or roughly ~2,000,000 pixels.
@@MarioRodriguez-pd6lp yeah my dog reacts the same when seeing a dog on tv as seeing a dog out the window. They might stuggle to see it due to the range of colours they perceive but they can at least make it out, even if poor quality
Sadly, it looks just like you are used to when seeing both television and the rest of the world, and hence seems 'fine'. I can assure you that if I ever lost a cone type and had to live watching tv or just looking at the world in general like that - it would be shit in comparison to what i had before! But human brains being the adapters they are I'd probably get used to and accept it - eventually. Dogs have a different optical system to us and so probably have a similar, but also different perspective, on what 'fine' constitutes compared to most humans.
Yes but it's beyond the scope of RGB so your eyes do a trick to be able to see it by having your Red Cone sensitive to it despite it being at the opposite end of the colour spectrum in such away that it overlaps a bit with blue. So - for an RGB screen to show you purple it adds a little bit of red to the blue and your brain then perceives the purple colour. It's fascinating stuff.
@@inksday Purple and violet are just shades of the same, so to be pedantic there may be a bit of red in the purple the effect is the same on how we perceive it and how it gets represented in an RGB display is basically the same.
Also the illusion of movement is very tailored to us. 60 images per second seems smooth for a human butt is choppy for a dog and a slideshow for most birds
The framerate needed for motion to appear smooth entirely depends on the type of motion and as well as that it depends on how you are When you are in a darkened theater watching a projector onto a screen each frame bleaches the eye momentarily so that when the next frame is shown there's a latent image of the previous frame. Also, historically film grain was very insensitive, any motion on film that was too fast would be smeared out into a blur, at 24 frames per second you wouldn't see something fast like a car speeding by as the car jumping from one position in the frame to the next frame, you'd see a vaguely car shaped blur merge together to look much smoother. Animators would deliberately exploit this effect by drawing fast movement in an elongated fashion. And animators knew they could go as low as 8 frames per second (animating on threes) with some actions and it'll look smooth. TVs were 60fps because they were trying to match the resonance frequency of grid electricity, each "frame" was not a complete frame, it was only half the data, every other line was skipped, so it was closer to 30fps. When digital moved to full frames (progressive scan) they kept the high framerate for compatibility, TV shows were all filmed at 30fps and all movies were at 24fps.
94% of humans cannot differentiate 24 frames per second from 30 frames per second. 99.97% of humans cannot differentiate 30 from 60, and thats logarithmic until you get to 1 in 7 million or so that can tell the difference between 240fps and 300fps. But the reason the crt television has a frequency of 59.97 is to perfectly maintain phase with the ac current from the wall, its how it was done before filtering was introduced in the late 50s. In fact, when china started producing timing control chips for their tv brands and even phones, they set them at 59.97 hz without understanding why we did it 80 years ago.
"Purple doesn't exist" is a helluva thing to drop in a conversation edit: buncha nerds in the comments today edit: except the one guy who tried to bring up 40k. He's a geek
@@bruceschneier6283maybe the guy in the video meant it in a way like how purple was always combined with/ called red for thousands of years so it technically existed but not really
GOD hates the sin, not the sinner! GOD is the Judge! don’t kill people! We need GOD! Please do not use THE LORD’S NAME in vain! Leave revenge to God! Karma isn’t real, GOD IS! We are all made in the image of GOD! Don’t call people fools! Don’t swear on anything! AMEN! 🙏🏾✝️
I was taught that if you look at a red rose the rose is actually every color in the color spectrum except red. The reason we perceived it as red is because it's reflecting off of the rose while all the other colors are being absorbed into the rose. I'm probably completely wrong but it sounded good.
For an object reflecting light this is entirely correct. That is why plants are green, they can absorb light from the other parts of the spectrum and make energy, but the green doesn't benefit them, so it is reflected off, and we see green; the plant absorbed the others. For a light source though, the color you see is what it is emitting.
@@JonathanBeck_Jooreally weird shit but I remember this from science class also red is usually loved by some specific flowers and I find that really weird now that roses would reflect red seeing some plants require it for budding 💀
I have always found that definition to be ridiculous. If u look thru the visible light spectrum, there are colours very very close to purple. Then comes the problem, what IS purple?? Even red colour is an arbitrary definition created by humans so to say purple does not exist is a nonsense we created
If my dog told me that, there would instantly be 2 serious factors that need immediate addressing! How is it that a dog can talk, and I don’t have any dogs!
Red and green light mixed make yellow light. Blue and green makes light blue (cyan). Blue and red makes pink (magenta). Blue red and green make white. Red and green make yellow is still my absolute favorite. It feels so fake, even if you try it yourself and have irrefutable proof.
Animals have cones too, dogs and cats just have 2 instead of 3, parrots actually have 4 and see ultraviolet light, so they see the image pretty much the same way relatively speaking
It’s kinda fascinating they may see some stuff the same way but others colors could be completely different. A single color from our perception can be created by a ton of different wavelength combos and ratios. However in animals that have different cone sensitivities, or in colorblind people, all those different combos that we perceive as the same color could each be totally different looking colors to them
I think it's more accurate to say we have a limited ability to see the frequencies of light. We aren't really imagining anything that we're looking at.
For anyone wondering, purple is in fact a colour, he meant "magenta". There is no magenta wavelength, you see magenta when your eyes see red and blue, but not green, which is impossible with a single wavelength, because the green wavelengths lie between the red and blue ones. The statement that magenta isn't a real colour because it doesn't have a single wavelength is really questionable though, because when light refracts of something, you would see a weighted combination of wavelengths, instead of a single wavelength. People can usually only see a 3-dimensional projection this space of colours, but this is usually sufficient.
This kinda reminds of the impossible colours (not sure exactly what's it called) super-vibrant orange And blue-yellow They don't really exist but some people if you cross eyes or look at high intensity light and other conditions people can perceive them (can't really say see since it's a like black-white that only exists because one eye sees black and the other white. To give an example that i actually can. The very vibrant orange i can too but couldn't blue-yellow i think) It's interesting concept though Also, i never really thought about it but If we have only blue red and green sensors and purple/magenta/violet is literally outside of the RGB that humans can see How can we see that range of colours? I hope someone made video explaining it. But i guess we should categorise pure mixed and impossible colours in school at least vaguely, such interesting topic nobody really talks about Maybe if someone studies brain and art but otherwise i don't think so… Ps: Based on what i found it's called Hyperbolic orange
@@nikolaskuklis5925 Blue, red and green sensors don't pick up on single wavelengths, but a small spectrum. The range is big enough to see purple. Biology books often include a diagram of the activation of the sensors for different colours.
You are mixing up Violet and Purple. Violet has a wavelength, purple and magenta do not. Purple and magenta are compensations of the mind because we are unable to actually see those colored wavelengths.
Just looking at my kitchen countertop, coffee pots, scissors, knives, microwave ovens, spice racks, faucets, and light switches are designed for humans, too.
This is inaccurate for dogs, who have fewer types of cones, and cats, who have less cones than humans. Birds, however, have four types of cones, so they wouldn't believe the screen
It's not that it wouldn't be. If you don't know how a TV works you might think that a TV somehow reproduces color in the same way as they appear in reality.
@@Gameboygenius That’s not what he fucking said lol. If he wanted to make the point of a tv projections only being made up of primary colors then that’s cool. Why say something trying to sound “profound” when it’s stupid as hell.
Red yellow and blue are primary colors that mix to make all other. Those Billion pixels mix colors and every second pixel is the same to provide people sitting at least 7 meters and further away see one color
Purple is just the green rods getting a pass. It's degreened white, just a yellow is deblued white, or teal is white minus the reds. Insects can't see red, so purple would be blue for them, unless it's got some UV on top. The rods of dogs might indeed also be seeing something close to a black and white tv where white is probably amber, but I'd need to really do some research to know for sure. It would also depend on the technical technology and spectral profiles of the rgb leds used.
There are no purple photons is 100% correct. Purple is a MIXTURE of blue and red which are at each end of the visible spectrum, hence there can be no photons that are purple
@@jhoughjr1the argument is that a single wavelength can be perceived as violet. For purple you need a combo of multiple wavelengths. specificity purple needs two wavelengths that activate your red and blue color cones at a 1:1 ratio and that ratio doesn’t exist as a single wavelength
Dogs see color too lmao. The point is a picture of something on a tv looks the same as if we saw it in real life. To a dog the colors may look very different in real life to what it looks like on tv
My Alsatian 🐶 use to stare relentlessly at my tv screen when it was off, because he could see his reflection! Then he’d look behind the screen to see whether the 🐶 was behind the tv! 😂 unfortunately he’s no longer with us! ❤ Alfie
It's not phycological creation. It's biology and how humans perceive the environment. It works different for other species. You might also say that there are no colors at all and the world is shades of grey and colorblind people see the world as it is.
Yes, colors are not real. It's your brain interpretation of light. No one sees the world with true colors, even colorblind people. Colors are our society construct. If you can't agree with me imagine an alternative universe with the same principles, all objects etc. But every specie inside it wouldn't perceive light as colors. The wavelenghts would exist same as our universe but the term "color" wouldn't exist. Do you understand now?
@@safirahmed Violet, with the shortest wavelength, appears at the bottom of the rainbow. Purple, however, is not present in the rainbow as it's not a spectral color. While violet is created by a single wavelength of light, purple is a mixture of red and blue light. Despite their visual similarity, violet and purple are distinct colors with different origins and properties. The common confusion between them often leads to misuse of "purple" when referring to the violet in a rainbow.
The day I understood this was a milestone…data is stored as very small electric signals, data is visualized as mixture of 3 colors, sound is just vibrations…hence a computer is complete.
Funny because some higher end tvs are now using yellow along with the original three for way better picture quality. I used to repair scoreboards and much of what he said was true though. Scoreboards work in a bunch of swappable squares. Each square has trio clusters of red, green, blue. You can increase picture quality by spacing them closer and getting more of them on each square. It’s the main reason scoreboards can get very expensive.
If you grew up in the eighties, you know dogs used to hate being around TV because of the high-pitch droning emitted by cathodic tubes and the low frame rate that made it look like strobing lights for them.
But didn’t they say people used to not see blue and dogs couldn’t see colors whatsoever? I think animals can adapt or evolved through generations to their environment
The sharp aqueous screen not only has RGB but it actually has a yellow diode as well and it said to produce the most colors out of any flat screen available to the General Public so I understand what you're saying that the average TV does this and it doesn't matter whether it's a CRT or a high definition television but the facts of the facts
Canine retinal cones are pretty similar to human blue and green cones, they are just missing the red one. Essentially like someone with red-green color blindness. The TV would still have “normal” colors for a dog
Violet. It's a secondary color, yes, but flowers are named for it. Many secondary and tertiary colors exist in nature. Just because humans only contain 3 cones doesn't mean it's a psychological creation.
Dogs have 2 cones so see colours in shades of blue, yellow and grey/brown (tan). All they've ever known as what we call green as tan so a jungle would look normal to them. The real problem is CRT TVs because they'll see the refresh rate, so it's obviously not real and irrelevant, but humans see a continuous image.
I’ve heard about that with purple. Also I’ve heard that blue was the most recent color human eyes have learned to notice. The color blue is rarest color in nature.
His physics are incorrect… wavelengths dictate color, which are part of the wave like properties of light, photons themselves would not have an inherent property of any color. Just depends the wavelength at which those photons are moving
Want video and photo content that grabs attention and drives views? 🎥🔥
Order your custom videos from us today and watch your brand soar!
Check the bio 🔗
PEACE AND LOVE but that horrible orange transition was PAINFUL!
All colours are a psychological creation.
Why is a marketing guy trying to (poorly) teach us science?
This content is absolute trash. Talking about commons sense like it's some kind of astounding discovery that nobody is aware of, is fuct. Get thw fuck outta here. This guy needs to get a different job
Maybe teach preschool. Or somewhere that his information will be new to the people he's trying to reach. This is so fucking lame
@@booknerd9691so was the entire video, and every other video posted by this person. Posting common sense information and acting like it's profound wisdom that nobody is aware of is fucking garbage
absolutely no thank you
If my dog ever tells me that a picture is shit, we’re going to have a serious conversation about how to share feedback
😂😂😂
I mean, this guy sounds legit smart as he's on stage with a mic and easy to listen to and got the science music in the background but... consider what he said lmfao
"TVs are actually designed for Humans"
....
almost like yknow, humans invented the TV for humans... THAT'S THE POINT OF A TV dumbass.
If my dog ever tells me that a picture is shit, I'm gonna go outside and see pigs flying.
I would say “come here, sit down. Lets have a chat mate. Now you are cute and thats not to be discredited, however i feed you, i house you, bathe you, and all you do is turn perfectly good food into shit. Now my television might not be to your standard and ill take that on board, but in future if you could approach the issue with a solution rather than just negativity that you be appreciated. You are a good boy though”
If my dog starts talking, i have lost it
If you wanna get technical: photons don’t have color at all. The frequency at which they wiggle makes your eyes detect color.
Wiggle? Is that like their vibration pattern?
@@Concerned-Nihilistyes, the wave length/“wiggle”
point is those colors don't have frequencies
Hey, you look familiar
@@anonymousx6651 what? Yes they do? Violet and blue vibrate at near ultraviolet frequencies?
Thanks for all the flashbangs you edited in your transitions
Seriously though
Facts 💯
Fr
Best comment ever 😂
I thought I was the only one like, wtf dude I already wear glasses can you chill with the flashes with the editing? Lol
"My favorite color is purple"
"Purple doesn't exist"
"Then niether do you, Barney"
If purple doesn’t exist then neither does brown.
@@Mazhypic it's a bit different, brown is darker shade of orange which still in the spectrum..
The "purple doesn't exist" is because it doesn't make sense in color addition mixing..
you mix red and green, you get yellow (yellow spectrum is between red and green)..
you mix green and blue, you get cyan (cyan spectrum is between green and blue)..
but when you mix red and blue, you get magenta or purple if darker yet in the spectrum between red and blue is green..
What similar to purple is black-grey-white, colors that our brain made up from multiple spectrums..
BLUE.
Blue is the only colour that does not naturally exist in nature. I must be "cheated".
Purple is just a combination of red and blue.
He forgot about ultraviolet light lol 🤣🤣🤣
@@kurniaprimaputra1313 Well violet is still in the spectrum, just not between red and blue, but the point is both are illusions and doesn't "exist" but of course they still do, because we can see them.
Why is this guy suddenly all over my RUclips?
Because there is an algorithm that is designed to send us crap
😂@@MyMusic-cd3do
@MyMusic-cd3do There is an algorithm which if you keep on watches clips with him in it to the end , then YT will send more as you are interested
@@mu6qy I understand, but explain to me why his videos first showed up, and all the other crap I'm not interested in, even when I haven't watched a video it will appear on my home page and keep reappearing. Clearly, I'm not interested, but the algorithm keeps pushing it. SO, they have an algorithm that pushes crap.
@@RobbeddoRrory sutherland
TV's designed for humans!??? Wow very insightful
And I bet the audience went home pattingv their backs on how clever they are now 😂
😂
I didn't know animals couldn't watch TV though I thought it was just black and white for them
lil bro didn't watch till the end
Yeah, I thought they were designed for penguins 🐧🐧🐧🐧
Tell that to my cat who tries to attack the 4K birds on the screen
Or any dog watching TV
Yes please!! That's exactly what I thought of. Pets obsess over critters and birds on the TV screens, so what are they actually seeing Mr Smarty Pants!? 😅
Movement
they can still see images of what the tv is trying to produce, but because the cones in their eyes are different then ours they see the light as different colours, making it so they can still make out objects, but they just look like the animal is tripping fucking balls
@@ScottGimpel I’ve never owned a dog that’s been interested in the tv and I’ve owned many many dogs.
I confirm that this is true. Yesterday, I was watching TV and my cat came up to me and said: "This looks shit. Why are you watching shit, bruh?"
You must've been watching the Kardashians
Omg that was so funny hur hur hur 🙄😒😐
@@xro1983 you're encourageable
You sure it was YOUR cat? Might have been an intruder. Or skin walker.
@@aidancristoforo5530 It was definitely my cat. The man in the video said animals think TV is shit so my cat confirmed it 🤣
Wow this blew my mind! I always thought TVs were made for pidgeons.
It is.
lol and he said tv’s have millions of billions of photons.
That means atleast 2,000,000,000,000,000 pixels.
An HD TV has 1080x1920 pixels, or roughly ~2,000,000 pixels.
It’s so crazy that human made tv’s were made for humans to use. Mind blown 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
It’s funny because some pets seem entertained by them also
@@MarioRodriguez-pd6lp yeah my dog reacts the same when seeing a dog on tv as seeing a dog out the window.
They might stuggle to see it due to the range of colours they perceive but they can at least make it out, even if poor quality
😂
I dont like your attitude young mister. Give mommy the ipad
😂😂😂 He nearly convinced me that the products were for dogs.
As a colorblind person who only has 2 working cones (same as a dog) I can tell you it looks just fine...
How would you know?
@@_Mr.Black_ there dog typed that
Sadly, it looks just like you are used to when seeing both television and the rest of the world, and hence seems 'fine'. I can assure you that if I ever lost a cone type and had to live watching tv or just looking at the world in general like that - it would be shit in comparison to what i had before!
But human brains being the adapters they are I'd probably get used to and accept it - eventually.
Dogs have a different optical system to us and so probably have a similar, but also different perspective, on what 'fine' constitutes compared to most humans.
This guy just waffles about absolutely anything😂
Purple is a real color, right at the very edge of the visual spectrum with a wavelength of between 380 and 430 nm
Yes but it's beyond the scope of RGB so your eyes do a trick to be able to see it by having your Red Cone sensitive to it despite it being at the opposite end of the colour spectrum in such away that it overlaps a bit with blue. So - for an RGB screen to show you purple it adds a little bit of red to the blue and your brain then perceives the purple colour. It's fascinating stuff.
Thats violet, which is not purple. Violet is a spectral color. Purple is a non-spectral color.
Not true
@@inksday Purple and violet are just shades of the same, so to be pedantic there may be a bit of red in the purple the effect is the same on how we perceive it and how it gets represented in an RGB display is basically the same.
@@inksday how do i create violet with pigments?.... ffs
Also the illusion of movement is very tailored to us. 60 images per second seems smooth for a human butt is choppy for a dog and a slideshow for most birds
The framerate needed for motion to appear smooth entirely depends on the type of motion and as well as that it depends on how you are
When you are in a darkened theater watching a projector onto a screen each frame bleaches the eye momentarily so that when the next frame is shown there's a latent image of the previous frame.
Also, historically film grain was very insensitive, any motion on film that was too fast would be smeared out into a blur, at 24 frames per second you wouldn't see something fast like a car speeding by as the car jumping from one position in the frame to the next frame, you'd see a vaguely car shaped blur merge together to look much smoother.
Animators would deliberately exploit this effect by drawing fast movement in an elongated fashion. And animators knew they could go as low as 8 frames per second (animating on threes) with some actions and it'll look smooth.
TVs were 60fps because they were trying to match the resonance frequency of grid electricity, each "frame" was not a complete frame, it was only half the data, every other line was skipped, so it was closer to 30fps. When digital moved to full frames (progressive scan) they kept the high framerate for compatibility, TV shows were all filmed at 30fps and all movies were at 24fps.
@@Treblaine tldr
Not really that interested in gamer bro science to explain why their set up is totally necessary
@@DanielPereira-ey9nt It's mostly about the history of cinema and film animation but if you want to be ignorant go ahead, your loss.
@@Treblaine I'm really sorry, I thought it was an answer to another comment I made
94% of humans cannot differentiate 24 frames per second from 30 frames per second. 99.97% of humans cannot differentiate 30 from 60, and thats logarithmic until you get to 1 in 7 million or so that can tell the difference between 240fps and 300fps. But the reason the crt television has a frequency of 59.97 is to perfectly maintain phase with the ac current from the wall, its how it was done before filtering was introduced in the late 50s. In fact, when china started producing timing control chips for their tv brands and even phones, they set them at 59.97 hz without understanding why we did it 80 years ago.
"Why is your favourite colour purple?"
"It already does what I dream of. Not existing."
And the most Emo comment award goes to… @cruxmind 🏆 🎉
or whatever..
"Purple doesn't exist" is a helluva thing to drop in a conversation
edit: buncha nerds in the comments today
edit: except the one guy who tried to bring up 40k. He's a geek
It would be if it wasn't stupid. 380-450nm sure looks like purple photons to me.
@@bruceschneier6283maybe the guy in the video meant it in a way like how purple was always combined with/ called red for thousands of years so it technically existed but not really
Indigo and violot? I'm sure half the world calls those purple?
Indigo is towards the blue.. violet is towards the red.. purple (as in the color of Grimace's) is in the middle between indigo & violet.
Grimes? @@KanchidoShinokyoufu
When a dog is on the screen, our dog freaks out and starts barking at it. I think they can see it pretty well
Just not certain colors.
He's upset by the alien dogs
Dogs can still see images (on flat screen) but it's colours are not correct.
I think you kinda missed the point.
GOD hates the sin, not the sinner! GOD is the Judge! don’t kill people! We need GOD! Please do not use THE LORD’S NAME in vain! Leave revenge to God! Karma isn’t real, GOD IS! We are all made in the image of GOD! Don’t call people fools! Don’t swear on anything! AMEN! 🙏🏾✝️
I don't know, guy seems full of his own opinion, cats seem to absolutely love to chase a colorful bird across the screen.
that's because you don't just swallow what you're fed, keep it up and don't get caught thinking... trump has won.
I mean, I think we all knew TVs were designed for us though. It wasn't like someone thought, "I'll invent a TV....hey, it works on humans! What luck!"
Whoosh
We found the winner on todays low IQ contest 🎉
Thats why this video is so dumb and unnecessary.
Exactly 😂 this guy just spouts rubbish like it's profound
@@kyarl6311 low IQ response haha.
I was taught that if you look at a red rose the rose is actually every color in the color spectrum except red. The reason we perceived it as red is because it's reflecting off of the rose while all the other colors are being absorbed into the rose. I'm probably completely wrong but it sounded good.
For an object reflecting light this is entirely correct. That is why plants are green, they can absorb light from the other parts of the spectrum and make energy, but the green doesn't benefit them, so it is reflected off, and we see green; the plant absorbed the others. For a light source though, the color you see is what it is emitting.
@@JonathanBeck_Jooreally weird shit but I remember this from science class also red is usually loved by some specific flowers and I find that really weird now that roses would reflect red seeing some plants require it for budding 💀
Yes, you are completely wrong. We say an object is a particular color if it reflects those colors. Roses are red.
how high were you?
@@TimothyWhiteheadzmis that for living creatures or just pleasant life? like the rose absorbed everything but the red ? I dunno
Step 1 Purchase beige cardigan
Step 2 Adopt plummy Stephen Fry voice
Step 3 State the obvious and/or talk nonsense
Step 4 Hit upload
Ste
That's why he's a genius. It's so simple.
Violet is a colour of photon above blue and below ultra violet
Purple is just the green rods getting a pass. It's degreened white, just a yellow is deblued white.
Yeah, it's not that it "doesn't exist", that would be like saying TVs don't exist, since they're combinations of other materials
He's still wrong @@unturned6066
#800080
I have always found that definition to be ridiculous. If u look thru the visible light spectrum, there are colours very very close to purple. Then comes the problem, what IS purple?? Even red colour is an arbitrary definition created by humans so to say purple does not exist is a nonsense we created
That strangest thing about TVs definitely isn’t that “TVs are designed for humans”😂😂
The strangest thing about TV is what people watch on it. 😂
Glad I wasn't the only one like bruh tf do you mean no duh😂😂
If my dog told me that, there would instantly be 2 serious factors that need immediate addressing! How is it that a dog can talk, and I don’t have any dogs!
Holy shit this edit is hurting my eyes. Can we have more flashes in here for epilepsy lovers?
That’s what I’m saying! I really hope there are more in the next one.
@@Phosfit Tell the algorithm that is what you want and you will get it!
Ah, another epilepsy enjoyer. Howdy, brother..
I have just watched this in the dark and the transitions have made my ears ring
"TV are actually made for humans"
So interesting. He's really smart.
dont study science from marketing guy
Red and green light mixed make yellow light.
Blue and green makes light blue (cyan).
Blue and red makes pink (magenta).
Blue red and green make white.
Red and green make yellow is still my absolute favorite. It feels so fake, even if you try it yourself and have irrefutable proof.
Actor. He's Smeagol.
So, my dog sees the equivalent of an acid trip? No wonder he digs watching!
I knew those Barney marathons I used to watch as a kid was just a fever dream!
Animals have cones too, dogs and cats just have 2 instead of 3, parrots actually have 4 and see ultraviolet light, so they see the image pretty much the same way relatively speaking
And peacock mantis shrimps has like a gazillion!!!
Some women are tetrachtomats also
It’s kinda fascinating they may see some stuff the same way but others colors could be completely different. A single color from our perception can be created by a ton of different wavelength combos and ratios. However in animals that have different cone sensitivities, or in colorblind people, all those different combos that we perceive as the same color could each be totally different looking colors to them
@@zigmand88hell yeah mantis shrimp are rad 🦐
No wonder my cat liked watching The Last Ship. That show was 90% blue and gray
I like the bit where he explained how dogs see TVs.
Photons don't really have color, our brain decided that the certain frequencies from photons equates to certain colors that we imagine in our head
I think it's more accurate to say we have a limited ability to see the frequencies of light. We aren't really imagining anything that we're looking at.
@tdk3654 yes we are, our brain processes what comes in from our eyes. Therefore we are imagining it
The dog has me dying 😂😂😂
Treadmills dont exist for this guy aswell
For anyone wondering, purple is in fact a colour, he meant "magenta".
There is no magenta wavelength, you see magenta when your eyes see red and blue, but not green, which is impossible with a single wavelength, because the green wavelengths lie between the red and blue ones.
The statement that magenta isn't a real colour because it doesn't have a single wavelength is really questionable though, because when light refracts of something, you would see a weighted combination of wavelengths, instead of a single wavelength.
People can usually only see a 3-dimensional projection this space of colours, but this is usually sufficient.
This kinda reminds of the impossible colours
(not sure exactly what's it called) super-vibrant orange
And blue-yellow
They don't really exist but some people if you cross eyes or look at high intensity light and other conditions people can perceive them (can't really say see since it's a like black-white that only exists because one eye sees black and the other white. To give an example that i actually can. The very vibrant orange i can too but couldn't blue-yellow i think)
It's interesting concept though
Also, i never really thought about it but
If we have only blue red and green sensors and purple/magenta/violet is literally outside of the RGB that humans can see
How can we see that range of colours? I hope someone made video explaining it.
But i guess we should categorise pure mixed and impossible colours in school at least vaguely, such interesting topic nobody really talks about
Maybe if someone studies brain and art but otherwise i don't think so…
Ps: Based on what i found it's called Hyperbolic orange
@@nikolaskuklis5925 Blue, red and green sensors don't pick up on single wavelengths, but a small spectrum.
The range is big enough to see purple.
Biology books often include a diagram of the activation of the sensors for different colours.
You are mixing up Violet and Purple. Violet has a wavelength, purple and magenta do not. Purple and magenta are compensations of the mind because we are unable to actually see those colored wavelengths.
So if you're colour blind and can't see purple your just normal
My Sharp Aquos Quattro has for separate colored pixels per set: Red, Green, Blue and Yellow.
-for- *four
Four fs
Just looking at my kitchen countertop, coffee pots, scissors, knives, microwave ovens, spice racks, faucets, and light switches are designed for humans, too.
My knives aren't I've just realized. Actually I've seen my dog using the kettle too so that's debatable 😅
the dog looks at them each day and says, "a bit shit, innit?"
My $1,000 tv exists*
My dog: shit image quality mate
Me sitting here smoking a joint while the guy on RUclips explains that purple doesn't exist... 😐🤔🤯
This is inaccurate for dogs, who have fewer types of cones, and cats, who have less cones than humans. Birds, however, have four types of cones, so they wouldn't believe the screen
I like how the subtitles are yellow
why the fuck would a tv not be made for humans?
not eveything we make is for ourselves, maybe aliens in the future can't
Because someone might assume the yellow from the tv is the same yellow from real life
It's not that it wouldn't be. If you don't know how a TV works you might think that a TV somehow reproduces color in the same way as they appear in reality.
@@Gameboygenius That’s not what he fucking said lol. If he wanted to make the point of a tv projections only being made up of primary colors then that’s cool. Why say something trying to sound “profound” when it’s stupid as hell.
My dog freaks out when he sees animals on screen, not only dogs, all animals, even if they are not makimg noises 😂😂😂
Red yellow and blue are primary colors that mix to make all other. Those Billion pixels mix colors and every second pixel is the same to provide people sitting at least 7 meters and further away see one color
Purple is just the green rods getting a pass. It's degreened white, just a yellow is deblued white, or teal is white minus the reds. Insects can't see red, so purple would be blue for them, unless it's got some UV on top. The rods of dogs might indeed also be seeing something close to a black and white tv where white is probably amber, but I'd need to really do some research to know for sure. It would also depend on the technical technology and spectral profiles of the rgb leds used.
There are no purple photons is 100% correct. Purple is a MIXTURE of blue and red which are at each end of the visible spectrum, hence there can be no photons that are purple
@@rty1955 white is also a mixture and there are no white photons either. De- greened white is exactly that, red and blue, without the green photons.
Nope. Purple is a shade of violet and does in fact exist
@@rty1955its 1000 percebt bot correct
@@jhoughjr1the argument is that a single wavelength can be perceived as violet. For purple you need a combo of multiple wavelengths. specificity purple needs two wavelengths that activate your red and blue color cones at a 1:1 ratio and that ratio doesn’t exist as a single wavelength
The man who doesn't understand the spectrum....
Or what photons are.
He's on the spectrum
Beat me to it! 🤣 @@danielburger1775
TIL dogs think we are crazy people watching random hypnotic patterns on our TVs
Furniture that is designed by humans is designed for humans! Amazing insight! /sarcasm ....and dogs are colorblind.
Dogs see color too lmao. The point is a picture of something on a tv looks the same as if we saw it in real life. To a dog the colors may look very different in real life to what it looks like on tv
dogs only see yellow and blue. so they are color blind, but not in the way people think colorblindness works where you see black and white.
My Alsatian 🐶 use to stare relentlessly at my tv screen when it was off, because he could see his reflection! Then he’d look behind the screen to see whether the 🐶 was behind the tv! 😂 unfortunately he’s no longer with us! ❤ Alfie
Perhaps alphi can see colors now and thru and behind TV screens.
Have you checked behind the TV?
So that's why I've never
been able to see purple...
It's not phycological creation. It's biology and how humans perceive the environment. It works different for other species. You might also say that there are no colors at all and the world is shades of grey and colorblind people see the world as it is.
Yes, colors are not real. It's your brain interpretation of light. No one sees the world with true colors, even colorblind people. Colors are our society construct.
If you can't agree with me imagine an alternative universe with the same principles, all objects etc. But every specie inside it wouldn't perceive light as colors. The wavelenghts would exist same as our universe but the term "color" wouldn't exist. Do you understand now?
Color blind ppl don't see in grey/black & white they see color too they just can't see green or sometimes red
Rainbows show a spectrum of colours as do prisms including purple.
@@safirahmed source? Not true
@@pluripotentprotoplasm Who are you to question reality?
@@safirahmed wow
@@safirahmed Violet, with the shortest wavelength, appears at the bottom of the rainbow. Purple, however, is not present in the rainbow as it's not a spectral color. While violet is created by a single wavelength of light, purple is a mixture of red and blue light. Despite their visual similarity, violet and purple are distinct colors with different origins and properties. The common confusion between them often leads to misuse of "purple" when referring to the violet in a rainbow.
Purple is a psychological construct.
GOSH the orange flashing is OPPRESSIVE
I feel like that last point about purple gets muddy when you start looking at the way different languages conceptualise purple… it’s pretty wild!
The day I understood this was a milestone…data is stored as very small electric signals, data is visualized as mixture of 3 colors, sound is just vibrations…hence a computer is complete.
Funny because some higher end tvs are now using yellow along with the original three for way better picture quality. I used to repair scoreboards and much of what he said was true though. Scoreboards work in a bunch of swappable squares. Each square has trio clusters of red, green, blue. You can increase picture quality by spacing them closer and getting more of them on each square. It’s the main reason scoreboards can get very expensive.
He forgot about ultraviolet lol 🤣🤣🤣
That's why the movie the color purple is special. Purple is basically hope, a spiritual color. 💯🙏🏿
So purple is imaginary? Gojo was onto something.
seeing purple is seeing red and blue at the same time
Dogs watch tv all the time because they’re in HD now, my dog loves bluey.
If you grew up in the eighties, you know dogs used to hate being around TV because of the high-pitch droning emitted by cathodic tubes and the low frame rate that made it look like strobing lights for them.
He’s wrong about purple. The color he’s thinking of is magenta.
My dog is always completely uninterested in screens, which made me assume that dogs need to smell things in order to believe that they are real
But didn’t they say people used to not see blue and dogs couldn’t see colors whatsoever? I think animals can adapt or evolved through generations to their environment
"TV's were designed for humans"
-That guy
Nooo. I really thought TVs were designed for hamsters before this man told me.
if memory serves, I think Sharp flagship models used to incorporate yellow pixels to the standard RGB on their Quattron series.
sir, this is a wendys...
Here’s me thinking tvs were designed for ants
But there is a wavelength that we percieve as purple
The sharp aqueous screen not only has RGB but it actually has a yellow diode as well and it said to produce the most colors out of any flat screen available to the General Public so I understand what you're saying that the average TV does this and it doesn't matter whether it's a CRT or a high definition television but the facts of the facts
These transitions feel like flashbangs......
So what does my pet mantis shrimp see when it looks at the T.V?
“That picture looks shit” That shit got me laughing so hard.
Fun fact Sharp used to make Quattron TVs with yellow pixels added to the RGB ones making the first RGBY displays.
"Do you know the strangest thing about a television? TV's are actually designed for humans." Crazy, no way. LOL
Canine retinal cones are pretty similar to human blue and green cones, they are just missing the red one. Essentially like someone with red-green color blindness. The TV would still have “normal” colors for a dog
what i got from that is that your dog thinks your broke and your tv is shit.
Blue & red makes purple, the 3 primary colors is red yellow blue & secondary colors are orange purple & green
Violet.
It's a secondary color, yes, but flowers are named for it. Many secondary and tertiary colors exist in nature. Just because humans only contain 3 cones doesn't mean it's a psychological creation.
My dog complained about this. He asked me "why are tvs designed for humans?" and i asked "why the fuck are you talking?"
All colours are psychological creations. The spectrum is not divided into colour bands with quite narrow transitions. It's a continuous variation.
Dogs have 2 cones so see colours in shades of blue, yellow and grey/brown (tan). All they've ever known as what we call green as tan so a jungle would look normal to them. The real problem is CRT TVs because they'll see the refresh rate, so it's obviously not real and irrelevant, but humans see a continuous image.
Purple is the colour of royalty, in other words, power. If purple doesn’t exist then power is an illusion
What kind of dope are you smoking? cuz I need to get some.
Just casually dropping that purple doesn't exist is wild
Always with the wild technicalities this guy 😂
Purple has always been my favourite colour and now I'm having an existential crisis about it.
That’s why color tv’s came with a red blue & green logo on them
And here's me thinking TV's weren't designed for humans.
1950s : We will have flying cars!
2024 : Tvs are designed for humans!
Purple is entirely a psychological creation goes well since the pineal chakra is purple 🟣
I’ve heard about that with purple. Also I’ve heard that blue was the most recent color human eyes have learned to notice. The color blue is rarest color in nature.
Originally TVs were designed for dogs, but not one dog had money to buy one
Perception is reality, my friend.
His physics are incorrect… wavelengths dictate color, which are part of the wave like properties of light, photons themselves would not have an inherent property of any color. Just depends the wavelength at which those photons are moving
He isn't physicist, he is financial marketing