@@WindyCityAstrophotography I am in bortle 5 directly overhead but they degrade quickly especially to the south (Bridgeport and NYC). My biggest problem is lots of trees so my FOV is not very good.
@@AstroQuest1 That can make it very tricky! I am glad I only have shorter trees to deal with, though a few of my dark sky sites have some tree issues. It's always something... 😂
Thank you for the videos! I have the exact same setup. Curious what did you use to mount the guidescope on top? Could you please share a link for the product?
Oh.. on favorite winter target.. I don't know if I can pick one.. so many good ones (M42, B33, Rosette, Thors helmet, etc, etc, etc).... maybe rosette. I don't know, lol.
Nice video; I am enjoying your channel. I'm glad you talked about the geosynchronous satellites. I've seen these also when imaging the Orion area. But their motion does not seem to be completely explained by the motion of the earth, as I think some (not all) of these satellites have non-zero orbit inclinations that make them move in their apparent altitude (above the horizon) as well. That's why not all of those tracks are parallel on the Witch Head. Thoughts? You've made me want to re-process my Witch Head data from last year and see if I can see those too!
Thanks so much, glad you are enjoying it! Yes, I think you're right, and the north/south oscillation is shown in the "vertical" displacement from parallel. I'm curious at some point to do an untracked shot of this region or similar. Star trails galore, but some well-defined points showing the GEO satellites, and then I presume a few very short trails at an angle different from the RA drift showing those slightly-inclined orbits.
I use some losmandy adapters, though at some point I want to get some that are a little lighter and lower profile. But these work great! optcorp.com/products/losmandy-dovetail-adapter-d-v-series?variant=44895978442
Do you mean a tracker like the Sky Watcher Star Adventurer? Yes those can do long-exposures, over a minute from what I understand if the polar alignment and balance is good. With my computerized mount and autoguiding I routinely do 2-minute exposures and don't lose any frames to bad tracking. I have gone longer at times with no issue, and have heard of others going 5 minutes or longer with my type of mount. I am only shooting at 400mm, so pretty forgiving on tracking.
@@WindyCityAstrophotography i use 2's exposure bc i dont have a tracker like yours but i did got 1/2 of the orion nebula, but thank you for the information.👍
@@Timothybolok ah very cool! Yes untracked shots are definitely possible! The channel Nebula Photos has a couple great videos about untracked imaging if I recall correctly
![Camera Rotation Assist in ASIAir Version 2.0 [New Feature!]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UU17Kai_lK0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Camera Rotation Assist in ASIAir Version 2.0 [New Feature!]](/img/tr.png)
Thanks for watching everyone! What is your favorite winter target for Astrophotography?
Flaming star is my favorite at the moment!
Since three years we have a lot of clouds in the winter. So all targets are welcome :)
Not only light pollution but led lamps and snow on top to reflect. Now there's a challenge. Data looks great 👍
Thanks! Yeah the subs were noticeably brighter because of the snow ❄️❄️❄️
Great video Nick - Really nice job of processing on what you were able to capture so far. Those street lights surrounding you are brutal!
Thanks Ron! Yes they are, though once the leaves are back the direct light at least is blocked pretty effectively.
Excellent video and astro tips. Thanks for sharing. Clear skies :-)
Thanks very much!
Very nice image! You continue to amaze with what you are able to do with a Bortle 9 sky. I promise I'll stop complaining about my Bortle 6 skies.
Thanks 😀 There is some amount of complaining absolutely allowed for anything worse than like Bortle 2 I think 😆
Well done buddy. I was out that night as well on the Rosette. Beautiful cold night.
Thanks! It definitely was both beautiful and cold 😁
Excellent video. Nice explanation and description of the satellites. Your just one degree north of me in Monroe, CT.
Thanks very much! Very nice, how dark are your skies?
@@WindyCityAstrophotography I am in bortle 5 directly overhead but they degrade quickly especially to the south (Bridgeport and NYC). My biggest problem is lots of trees so my FOV is not very good.
@@AstroQuest1 That can make it very tricky! I am glad I only have shorter trees to deal with, though a few of my dark sky sites have some tree issues. It's always something... 😂
Thank you for the videos! I have the exact same setup. Curious what did you use to mount the guidescope on top? Could you please share a link for the product?
Sure thing! It's two of the Losmandy Dovetail Adapters, D and V series optcorp.com/products/losmandy-dovetail-adapter-d-v-series?variant=44895978442
@@WindyCityAstrophotography Thank you! :)
wow, such wonderful video sir. which camera did you use for time-laps sir?
Thank you! That was shot on a Nikon D800, 15sec exposures
@@WindyCityAstrophotography thank you 🙂
R2D2: Check
Cat tree: Check
Yep.. seems you have all the needed accessories for this hobby ;)
Nice result for just a couple hours in a B9.
Oh.. on favorite winter target.. I don't know if I can pick one.. so many good ones (M42, B33, Rosette, Thors helmet, etc, etc, etc).... maybe rosette. I don't know, lol.
LOL I know and my cat was even going crazy during the recording 😆 I like how R2 was peeking over the couch arm in this one 😀
@@DSOImager same. I think it is Horsehead for me, though, if I have to pick one.
Nice video; I am enjoying your channel. I'm glad you talked about the geosynchronous satellites. I've seen these also when imaging the Orion area. But their motion does not seem to be completely explained by the motion of the earth, as I think some (not all) of these satellites have non-zero orbit inclinations that make them move in their apparent altitude (above the horizon) as well. That's why not all of those tracks are parallel on the Witch Head. Thoughts? You've made me want to re-process my Witch Head data from last year and see if I can see those too!
Thanks so much, glad you are enjoying it! Yes, I think you're right, and the north/south oscillation is shown in the "vertical" displacement from parallel. I'm curious at some point to do an untracked shot of this region or similar. Star trails galore, but some well-defined points showing the GEO satellites, and then I presume a few very short trails at an angle different from the RA drift showing those slightly-inclined orbits.
How do you attach orion guide scope to rasa?
I use some losmandy adapters, though at some point I want to get some that are a little lighter and lower profile. But these work great! optcorp.com/products/losmandy-dovetail-adapter-d-v-series?variant=44895978442
Does a tracker stay on target when using a long exposure/shutter time?
Do you mean a tracker like the Sky Watcher Star Adventurer? Yes those can do long-exposures, over a minute from what I understand if the polar alignment and balance is good. With my computerized mount and autoguiding I routinely do 2-minute exposures and don't lose any frames to bad tracking. I have gone longer at times with no issue, and have heard of others going 5 minutes or longer with my type of mount. I am only shooting at 400mm, so pretty forgiving on tracking.
@@WindyCityAstrophotography i use 2's exposure bc i dont have a tracker like yours but i did got 1/2 of the orion nebula, but thank you for the information.👍
@@Timothybolok ah very cool! Yes untracked shots are definitely possible! The channel Nebula Photos has a couple great videos about untracked imaging if I recall correctly
@@WindyCityAstrophotography ok. thank you