Multicopters Take Flight | Intel

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024
  • The Volocopter VC200 made aircraft history on March 30, 2016 as the first certified multicopter to fly with a person onboard. Designed by German company e-volo, this electric aircraft gives people a glimpse into a future where, one day, travel may exist above street traffic. “The Volocopter is super easy to fly, silent and built with electrical simplicity compared to helicopters, which are difficult to fly, loud and mechanically complex,” said Jan Stumpf, CEO of Ascending Technologies, an Intel company that has worked with e-volo since 2013.
    Technology developed by Ascending Technologies enabled the flight controls, motor electronics and key elements that extend multi-rotor UAV technology to this new type of aircraft.
    Special thank you to e-volo for sharing this video. Learn more about the company here: volocopter.com/
    Subscribe now to Intel on RUclips: intel.ly/3IX1bN2
    About Intel:
    Intel, the world leader in silicon innovation, develops technologies, products and initiatives to continually advance how people work and live. Founded in 1968 to build semiconductor memory products, Intel introduced the world's first microprocessor in 1971. This decade, our mission is to create and extend computing technology to connect and enrich the lives of every person on Earth.
    Connect with Intel:
    Visit Intel WEBSITE: intel.ly/Intel
    Follow Intel on TWITTER: intel.ly/Twitter
    Follow Intel on INSTAGRAM: intel.ly/Insta...
    Follow Intel on LINKEDIN: intel.ly/LinkedIn
    Follow Intel on TIKTOK: intel.ly/TikTok
    Multicopters Take Flight | Intel
    / intel

Комментарии • 200

  • @casey360360
    @casey360360 3 года назад +3

    The mechanic for rotation on the vertical axis is freaking awesome! Mounting the props at different angles, slowing props that sit at certain angles while speeding up props of opposing angle. Absolutely brilliant.

    • @filmcarsetc
      @filmcarsetc 3 года назад +1

      What does intel have to do with tho?

  • @OussamaErraji
    @OussamaErraji 8 лет назад +73

    People wondering about why such an Idea: the main reason being easier control. Helicopters are very difficult to pilot and with a machine like this all the job is done by the software running the electronic control of the rotors. All you have to do is to intuitively control the lever, the rest is done by the control units.

    • @verybang
      @verybang 8 лет назад

      +Oussama Erraji Yes, if the final build goes faster than 5mph

    • @TheFishCostume
      @TheFishCostume 8 лет назад +9

      +Oussama Erraji Also, multiple rotors like this offers much higher redundancy. If one rotor fails, you still have seventeen more.

    • @Dasmaster1
      @Dasmaster1 8 лет назад +7

      As opposed of having the computer control a normal helicopter?

    • @xponen
      @xponen 8 лет назад

      +Das Neko why don't they? My guess is; out-dated tech.

    • @Dasmaster1
      @Dasmaster1 8 лет назад

      xponen
      Out-dated tech? Such as what?

  • @LoretaiMods
    @LoretaiMods 8 лет назад +7

    wow such an exciting flight........ GJ grannycopter

  • @SKRUBL0RD
    @SKRUBL0RD 5 лет назад +1

    nice ROFLCOPTER

  • @cheddarcheese
    @cheddarcheese 7 лет назад +11

    “The Volocopter is super easy to fly, silent and built with electrical simplicity" I think their definition of silent different than mine.

    • @clintonlamm7198
      @clintonlamm7198 6 лет назад

      I. Would like to own one. How much does it cost

    • @gfdia35
      @gfdia35 5 лет назад +2

      What's this silent nonsense, none of the human sized drone style copters are even close to silent

    • @casey360360
      @casey360360 3 года назад

      Compared to a traditional turbine powered helicopter? This is silent.

  • @DavidSmith-ox4tu
    @DavidSmith-ox4tu 5 лет назад +2

    Having worked on the first revision of the ISC (Intel Server Control) and validating the sensory component instrumentation software it makes me wonder how the control unit and the hardware interface operates.

  • @sharanara
    @sharanara 8 лет назад +17

    Intel is awesome. AMD is awesome. Nvidia is awesome. Everything is awesome

  • @mariobeans
    @mariobeans 8 лет назад +2

    crazy to think someone might build one with true fpv racing controls.

  • @leonardomena6321
    @leonardomena6321 7 лет назад +1

    me acuerdo cuando andaban asiendo las primeras pruebas felisidades. chingon

  • @geraldharper330
    @geraldharper330 7 лет назад +1

    Awesome. It seems that we only need better batteries.. Nice flight

  • @akargcoldworld6757
    @akargcoldworld6757 8 лет назад +2

    Carbon neutral, cool, on the right track

  • @daisyduck8593
    @daisyduck8593 7 лет назад +2

    Why 18 engines (copters): Security! It is more secure than a double-4-copter (8 engines) or double-hexa-copter (12 engines).

  • @marcosmedeiros2552
    @marcosmedeiros2552 6 лет назад

    Tecnologia inovadora para um futuro melhor ..

  • @mattleading9888
    @mattleading9888 8 лет назад +1

    Brilliant Chaps thats epic!!

  • @carlhopkinson
    @carlhopkinson 2 года назад

    Now they need to bring up the lateral speed to at least 80 mph.

  • @householdnamenyc
    @householdnamenyc 6 лет назад

    Congratulations on this record-setting flight! 'Democratizing flight' is a visionary goal; one that will radically change the future of commuting.

  • @ShahHarsh1999
    @ShahHarsh1999 6 лет назад

    This is inspire me and proud to being Electronics and communication Engineer

  • @carlhopkinson
    @carlhopkinson 2 года назад

    I fly this in MicroSoft Flight Simulator....so cool.

  • @code988yay
    @code988yay 8 лет назад +1

    I was half expecting it to go into hyperspace once it was high enough
    They should add a rocket thing on the Back hole to speed it up

    • @bluefireyoutubezxprofireba7755
      @bluefireyoutubezxprofireba7755 5 лет назад

      Yeah, but if they but a "rocket thing" on the back, it would just do front flips and crash, Genius.

    • @what5385
      @what5385 4 года назад

      Permission to initiate warp speed

  • @TheRealNashvilleLimo
    @TheRealNashvilleLimo 7 лет назад +1

    I love it, but if you lose one engine, your done, and no chance of auto-rotation, or any dead stick glide-ratio... is there a parachute like on a cirrus? I mean it's super cool, but with all those little engines that depend on each other for stability aren't you just increasing your chances for a point of failure? I understand you would not be if you lose one, and the other can off-set such a loss, so I am just wondering if anybody knows what is the minimum\maximum engine failures in which you can still maintain flight or even what you would do in CPU failure, as it seems that condition would be a big concern, as aerodynamically, this defies all basics of lift when those prop aren't turning, it becomes a rock. Please educated me?

  • @rickhobson3211
    @rickhobson3211 4 года назад

    Wish we could have had this without the music.

  • @TedSeeber
    @TedSeeber 5 лет назад

    I am curious- what is the purpose of the tail cone?

  • @scharlackrenan
    @scharlackrenan 8 лет назад

    CONGRATULATIONS!!

  • @debojitkakoti8021
    @debojitkakoti8021 8 лет назад

    nice i like this design

  • @thesaturdaytechchannelwith553
    @thesaturdaytechchannelwith553 8 лет назад +1

    The benefits of this I believe would probably be as drones naturally calculate the geometry of the flight, it would mean the majority of the inflight mathematics can be done by a computer and therefore, as a result, the pilot only has to be focused on what and where he wants to go without additional inflight problems, a helicopter or even a plan/jet pilot would be concerned about, as you can clearly see the man demonstrating the model drone-copter has only got directional monitors, simple-to-use start up controls, radio and a joystick which makes this as easy to fly as it is effectively to drive a car (in terms of complexity, not functionality).
    I believe in contrast, that if this were to be commercially available there would have to be heavier regulation as if their were millions upon millions flying around in the these drone-copters due to accessibility and it would have to be taxed the same as a helicopter in my opinion as it's a legitimate mode of transport that would require many people nation or world wide in a much larger more connected air traffic control network and would be very complicated to manage.
    So yeah, I seem an indefinite future for this technolgy and if this becomes commercially available with the adequate regulation and management would be something of a transport based revolution!

  • @aybin.v.k9562
    @aybin.v.k9562 6 лет назад

    Thanks

  • @danielfuka7584
    @danielfuka7584 3 года назад

    Silly question, but isn't Airport ATC globally in English?

  • @mostafasaadinasab6338
    @mostafasaadinasab6338 4 года назад

    #all awesome

  • @carlhopkinson
    @carlhopkinson 2 года назад

    I WANT ONE!!!!

  • @fredyactionpro
    @fredyactionpro 7 лет назад +1

    Hi, Hwo is the of soud track pleace?

  • @mohini656
    @mohini656 3 года назад

    Yes, sheare it mix of my favorite. thanks. today.

  • @mostafasaadinasab6338
    @mostafasaadinasab6338 4 года назад

    Intelligente awesome

  • @zakirullah4088
    @zakirullah4088 6 лет назад

    Its superb.

  • @hbarudi
    @hbarudi 6 лет назад

    Great concept being electric and all, but it can't go for more than a few miles before it says battery low. Looks like it is targeted to major cities that can use this to get around inside the city but never out of a city.
    Made out of fiber reinforced composite material that is lightweight and strong and has mass of 290kg and can carry 160kg on it.
    But we still don't have an electric helicopter with battery life that is comparable to a gas tank for a gas helicopter yet. I wish they continue this research until one such thing can be made.

  • @Sauerland39
    @Sauerland39 8 лет назад

    25 Minuten Flugzeit sind nicht wirklich viel........bleibt zu hoffen, das die Akkus in Zukunft Leistungsstärker werden und sich somit die Flugzeit deutlich erhöhen wird........

  • @NedvigimostSpain
    @NedvigimostSpain 8 лет назад

    Muy bien!

  • @111danish111
    @111danish111 6 лет назад

    How long does the battery last ?

  • @camuri_negreira
    @camuri_negreira 7 лет назад

    Great! now to increase the autonomy.

  • @barrymccoy8353
    @barrymccoy8353 7 лет назад

    Thomas Wilson this is for you!

  • @hemanthmadipalli6121
    @hemanthmadipalli6121 7 лет назад +1

    superb brossssssssss

  • @RafaelHabegger
    @RafaelHabegger 7 лет назад

    12min fligh time max as dji?

  • @ellemar1614
    @ellemar1614 8 лет назад +1

    soundtrack?

  • @RennieAsh
    @RennieAsh 8 лет назад +3

    The audio is very distracting and doesn't fit someone flying the thing at 2km/h and a rotation speed of 1 every 3 minutes ;p

    • @sapphires786
      @sapphires786 8 лет назад +2

      agreed! you must be into music or sound field to have pointed that ;)

    • @RennieAsh
      @RennieAsh 8 лет назад

      Sapphires7 interested in it yes :-) Haven't studied it "officially" though.

  • @ravieze
    @ravieze 8 лет назад

    how is this any better thanheli copters?

  • @CarlyWaarly
    @CarlyWaarly 8 лет назад

    Would it not be more efficient to have the blades incorporated into the frame, not on top, it would also protect them.

    • @RennieAsh
      @RennieAsh 8 лет назад

      It's probably lighter and more stable (and cheaper) for what they wanted to do. Also considering the amount of motors this is probably a more rigid structure.

  • @leonardphilippgaffke2490
    @leonardphilippgaffke2490 8 лет назад

    Ja toll.^^
    Und wo ist bei diesem Ding jetzt der genaue Vorteil gegenüber einem gewöhnlichen Helikopter?
    Ich meine wozu das Rad neu erfinden?
    Für eine ernstgemeinte Antwort von den Erfindern oder Ihren Mitarbeitern wäre ich dankbar. Ich wäre sehr dankbar für eine detailgenaue jedoch trotzdem auch für Laien verständliche Erläuterung der Unterschiede dieser Technologie gegenüber dem herkömmlichen Helikopter. Aber bitte wirklich nur von Fachleuten die direkt an diesem Projekt beteiligt sind.
    Auf irgendwelche Klugscheißererklärungen von Möchtegernbescheidwissern lege ich keinen Wert.

    • @Sauerland39
      @Sauerland39 8 лет назад

      Du hast lediglich nur noch einen Joystick zum steuern und nicht so ne komplizierte Steuerung wie bei nem Hubschrauber...

  • @fidellouisfks2558
    @fidellouisfks2558 7 лет назад

    good

  • @pangkolmo
    @pangkolmo 8 лет назад

    The say UFO ain't true. Look you made one! :)

  • @dronbot3720
    @dronbot3720 5 лет назад

    price?

  • @WhatEvaYsay
    @WhatEvaYsay 8 лет назад +1

    After reading thru all thse comment
    I still dun get why with all the rotors??

    • @xpeter123xplaysonyoutube
      @xpeter123xplaysonyoutube 8 лет назад

      to lift the weight. they are electric and not as powerful as petrol or diesel so they need more

    • @athertop
      @athertop 8 лет назад

      Each rotor provides thrust and enough are required to lift the craft plus passengers, plus have enough in reserve to provide redundancy plus have enough in excess to provide control - so it move through wind/weather. Safety in numbers (redundancy) provides enough lift to maintain control if one or more motors fail, allowing a safe emergency landing. If you just had 4 motors/props and one fails, then you'd be screwed! Normally, you design a multirotor to provide twice the required thrust of the all-up weight (AUW).

  • @maskman4821
    @maskman4821 8 лет назад

    awesome

  • @flooxz8653
    @flooxz8653 8 лет назад

    Zeigt mir bitte mal einen sinnvollen Anwendungsfall für diesen Volocopter. Sinnvoller Anwendungsfall heißt, wo ich dem bisher verwendeten Konzept bei Drehflüglern gegenüber einen Vorteil habe. Bis jetzt kann ich ja leider nur Nachteil entdecken: Sehr geringe Flugzeit ( max. 30 Min), keine Möglichkeit einer Autorotation und geringe Zuladung. Wo bitte ist dieses Konzept denn inovativ?

    • @flooxz8653
      @flooxz8653 7 лет назад

      "In der Stadt" wird es auch für dieses Fluggerät keine Start- und Landeerlaubnis geben. Außer es ist ein Fluggerät zur Rettung von Personen und dafür reicht die Zuladung bei Weitem nicht aus. Vielleicht um Hunde und Katzen zur Notaufnahme zu transportieren sollte es ausreichen.

  • @1950Raman
    @1950Raman 8 лет назад

    If one fan fails, will the system remain afloat?

  • @MRSKTHAKUR
    @MRSKTHAKUR 8 лет назад

    team work

  • @Round_Death
    @Round_Death 7 лет назад +6

    Do a flip plz.

  • @kurito_
    @kurito_ 8 лет назад

    how long lasts the battery?
    or does it need fuel?

  • @samolet-legko
    @samolet-legko 4 года назад +1

    Большой расход электроэнергии, требуются моторы большой мощности и аккумуляторы с большой ёмкостью и токаотдачей.
    И искусственный шум сильно мешает просмотру, дурацкая мода намеренно ухудшать качество звука и видео.

  • @manstaha
    @manstaha 7 лет назад

    how much is this selling for?

  • @Mepulan
    @Mepulan 8 лет назад +24

    at first I read Yolocopter

    • @tabcreedence6553
      @tabcreedence6553 6 лет назад +1

      It's actually roflcopter

    • @nob0dy27_
      @nob0dy27_ 4 года назад

      Tab Creedence my roflcopter goes soi soi soi

  • @CarlyWaarly
    @CarlyWaarly 8 лет назад

    Can this float to the ground if the power or electronics fail?

    • @athertop
      @athertop 8 лет назад

      Haha, like a brick floats!

    • @CarlyWaarly
      @CarlyWaarly 8 лет назад

      Auto rotation?

    • @athertop
      @athertop 8 лет назад

      +CSMedia in autorotation on a standard helicopter, you have a variable (collective) pitch and the resistance if a huge mechanical gearbox to control the speed of descent. On a multirotor with no power the motor would provide no control whatsoever.

    • @CarlyWaarly
      @CarlyWaarly 8 лет назад

      Paul Atherton Thanks!

    • @SydneySewerat
      @SydneySewerat 8 лет назад

      the volocopter comes with a ballistic parachute for safety and aircraft protection, and is supposed to be more reliable than a helicopter so hopefully hardly ever needed.

  • @bhushanraymal9125
    @bhushanraymal9125 6 лет назад

    Is running over electrical power

  • @dkilroy7037
    @dkilroy7037 4 года назад

    Hi Im working on a show about amazing machines for the BBC and would love to get permission to use this film in the show. Could you please provide me with an email address of the relevant person to speak to? Thanks.

    • @Intel
      @Intel  4 года назад

      Hello! You can send your request to our Trademarks and Branding team at trademarks.and.brands@intel.com.

  • @-cutekey2454
    @-cutekey2454 5 лет назад

    maybe a car of the future

  • @shravanshravan4402
    @shravanshravan4402 8 лет назад +2

    its very dangerous, any single rotor failure can make it out of balance and even if you are using some balancing algorithm still it may be difficult to make an emergency escape for the pilot
    .

    • @einfachnurleo7099
      @einfachnurleo7099 8 лет назад

      ... I understand what you want to say, but what do you think happens if the same thing happens to a helicopter? If think you´ll be able to get this thing down save even if 2 rotos fail (they probably built in a few extra once just to be save)

    • @RennieAsh
      @RennieAsh 8 лет назад +1

      I think it could compensate quite well for one motor failing. The battery on the other hand...

    • @athertop
      @athertop 8 лет назад

      I build multi-rotors, and even a hexacopter (6 rotors) can be controllable if a rotor fails - as long as its designed so that the remaining rotors are able to produce enough thrust - so its all down to design! No doubt the other electronics of a man carrying multi-rotor would have been designed with redundancy too, allowing for failure.
      Without variable (collective) pitch rotors a multi-rotor is disadvantaged in power loss situations, compared with traditional helis, so a lot more thought needs to be given to redundant systems.

    • @circleinfo
      @circleinfo 7 лет назад

      But it is much safer then a helicopter. If one rotor from a helicopter fails... Well then you can say goodbye to the world. Multicopters like these are programmed that the remaining ones are compensating the broken ones. One one side the will go faster on other side they will go slower. Even 5 rotors could break (not on the same side tho) and you can still landing safe.

    • @junoguten
      @junoguten 6 лет назад +1

      In a regular helicopter you have control of the angle of the blades, so in case of full engine failure and providing you're not too close to the ground you can unclutch and use the fall to spin up the rotors and then change the angle to generate lift right before you land.

  • @foreverraining1522
    @foreverraining1522 8 лет назад

    How does this thing create thrust?!

    • @carlhopkinson
      @carlhopkinson 2 года назад

      By tilting the rotor assembly....just like in a helicopter.

  • @bryangracia8324
    @bryangracia8324 8 лет назад

    This is The future?

  • @ilustrado7291
    @ilustrado7291 8 лет назад

    What do you guys think would happen if 1 of the motors die? Perhaps a bird went through it or somethin

    • @athertop
      @athertop 8 лет назад

      Redundancy allows for failed motors - thats why there are so many!

    • @ilustrado7291
      @ilustrado7291 8 лет назад

      Paul Atherton I see. That makes more sense.

    • @sharanara
      @sharanara 8 лет назад

      +Helium Punk (H3) Exactly. And just like in your car with how it has abs and sensors and stuff, it could increase a motors power to compensate.

  • @kevlar8899
    @kevlar8899 6 лет назад

    Music by????? (please)

  • @hbsharkman
    @hbsharkman 6 лет назад

    a helicopter with Meltdown?

  • @bluefireyoutubezxprofireba7755
    @bluefireyoutubezxprofireba7755 5 лет назад

    I would of flew that as high as he was flying it at 2:50 and jump out, literally! Since I'm 28 how would I die?

  • @kaduoliveira2390
    @kaduoliveira2390 6 лет назад

    Eu apenas acho que deveria haver um motor exclusivo para cada helice tornando o assim quase que zero a chance de possiveis acidentes porque em caso de pane de um outro daria sustentacao

  • @SiapSiup
    @SiapSiup 8 лет назад +3

    But why ? Isnt normal helicopters good enough? I think that one strong rotor is better that few smaller. It seems like art for art.

    • @ltrodd
      @ltrodd 8 лет назад +3

      +cotytupocotytu Why? Lose an engine or 2 or 3 and your fine in this one, it's mechanically very simple so it requires very little maintenance, it's far cheaper to run, it's potentially far cheaper to build, the computer can precisely control rotors to make very simple flight controls rather than complex flight controls of regular copter, etc...

    • @RennieAsh
      @RennieAsh 8 лет назад +1

      Normal helicopter needs a tail for balance, is heavier, louder, more difficult to control - if something is slightly out of balance, helicopter self destructs.

    • @circleinfo
      @circleinfo 7 лет назад +3

      Even a kid could fly such multicopter. You simply need nearly no knowledge. Thats the whole point of this.
      Making a helicopter flying licence is hard as hell and takes extremly long time. With something like these you could simply fly to work.

  • @hatatehimekaidou7442
    @hatatehimekaidou7442 7 лет назад +2

    Yolocopter

  • @muhnadalswidani9043
    @muhnadalswidani9043 5 лет назад

    Volocopter ist geferlich

  • @N8904V
    @N8904V 8 лет назад

    It does not go fast (Its slow). He does not fly it far.. It can't fly any higher then that?

  • @huiyterts1503
    @huiyterts1503 8 лет назад +5

    Wow. you made a helicopter not only pointless and more expensive than a ordinary heli... you also made a less efficient heli as well. but hey... good work???

    • @geertvisser6629
      @geertvisser6629 7 лет назад +1

      Huiy Terts i thought exactly the same thing XD

    • @jamesneilsongrahamloveinth1301
      @jamesneilsongrahamloveinth1301 6 лет назад +3

      Looks potentially safer than an ordinary helicopter, more stable, easier to fly and cheaper to maintain. I guess that's a start . . .

    • @gusty_scarf
      @gusty_scarf 5 лет назад

      there also going to be used as taxis in major cities like New York, Singapore, Paris, Tokyo, and Berlin.

  • @kayrxx7123
    @kayrxx7123 4 года назад

    AMD would need to use only 1 fan to fly...

  • @thefrub
    @thefrub 7 лет назад

    If it's electric, why does it have an exhaust pipe like a normal chopper?

    • @nelsonwalker7105
      @nelsonwalker7105 6 лет назад

      It might be cooling fan exhaust for batteries

    • @junoguten
      @junoguten 6 лет назад

      They probably just took the body from a normal heli and cut off the tail.

  • @ewed418
    @ewed418 7 лет назад

    this "drone" it's so easy to fly, easy like flight simulator :) that's the breakthrough

  • @erayzpr2677
    @erayzpr2677 8 лет назад

    neden intel olduğunu bir daha anlıyoruz.

  • @emart687
    @emart687 8 лет назад

    Why is he scared to fly forward, what's the point of just hovering ?

    • @maxiecoates8108
      @maxiecoates8108 8 лет назад

      1st ever manned test of a non-mechanical helicopter probably has something to do with. You walk before you run.

  • @mostafasaadinasab6338
    @mostafasaadinasab6338 4 года назад

    #Designer#episode episode Full#dank vielen#Highlights#subskribe

  • @akshayrathore2882
    @akshayrathore2882 8 лет назад +6

    I thought we passed the point of invention helicopter some 70 years back

    • @xpeter123xplaysonyoutube
      @xpeter123xplaysonyoutube 8 лет назад

      these are basiclly giant drones and they are quieter and lighter (read the description)

    • @akshayrathore2882
      @akshayrathore2882 8 лет назад +1

      Peters Games giant manned drones? so a helicopter basically.

    • @athertop
      @athertop 8 лет назад +2

      I we had given up further inovation after inventing the wheel, then you'd have a lovely set of wooden rims on your pimp up cart!

    • @circleinfo
      @circleinfo 7 лет назад +1

      Every person with hands could fly a multicopter like this without much knowledge. Do you also can say this about helicopters? I will visit you at your grave.
      On Top of that 5 rotors can break and you are still flying. What will happen if the one rotor of a helicopter will break?

    • @billjuhasz3875
      @billjuhasz3875 7 лет назад +1

      With the same electronics a regular helicopter would indeed be just as easy to fly. Try to fly a quad or "Volo" copter without fly by wire, gyro stabilized, GPS control, it would be essentially impossible. What makes this thing easy to fly is not the configuration, it's the computers.
      I also wonder if this thing has any ability to auto-rotate, as is required of all helicopters. Without auto-rotation capability this thing would fall like a stone if it ran out of power. A normal helicopter can land without power by using the "auto-rotating" blades to fly like an auto-gyro, I con't see how Volocopter would do this with the fixed pitched blades.

  • @yaglehoole5662
    @yaglehoole5662 6 лет назад

    One look at the air frame and I can tell it was an over-engineered Deusche contraction.

  • @aksiiska9470
    @aksiiska9470 5 лет назад

    Wie lange kann die Maschine in der luft bleiben? ein konventioneller Hubschrauber... leider gab es auf deutsch keine gescheiten ergebnisse
    uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090116125519AAAYK9f&guccounter=1

  • @barrymccoy8353
    @barrymccoy8353 7 лет назад

    Leave it up to the Germans!

  • @PatatjesDora
    @PatatjesDora 8 лет назад +5

    Forgot to unsub after the giveaway Kappa

    • @Fietsaap
      @Fietsaap 8 лет назад

      +Mario van Rooij Precies

  • @thayronyfernandes1301
    @thayronyfernandes1301 8 лет назад

    #internetjusta

  • @thetaai8262
    @thetaai8262 5 лет назад +1

    now all it need is a nuclear reactor and you can stay in the air for years

  • @SandraMaraCarvalhodeMelo
    @SandraMaraCarvalhodeMelo 8 лет назад +1

    Friends Intel good morning in word is magnifique ,great is Project reality wonderful , a union of talent ,dedicate in all stages of creation and conclusion ,see and know a historia of creation of project ,a overcome and creative ,with simplicity and creative reach o promise ,Great with simplicity of control ,easy of duty and pratic where in minutes may fleat and reach in time ,Great for victoria ,and to be electric ,is fantastic , for future a evoluction is today for Intel and all that will invest ,and for future present ,all build have one space for transport and use with sure ,imagine with micro placa solar one possible fantastic ,imagine may do tranasport in short time mediction of place for ohers in rapid time. Friends imagine a possible of volocopter may help high fire of florest ,may use a easy motion for all side .,friends for future a possible may double in action pratic

  • @Lawi_Jake
    @Lawi_Jake 8 лет назад

    just German things

  • @ackkipfer
    @ackkipfer 8 лет назад +1

    This is not safe, i mean in a scenario on witch you lost let's say power, helicoperter and even gyrocopter have the ability to do AUTO-ROTATION, u can't do in here....not with that setup at least!
    Now, sure as hell it's way simple to pilot, no arguments on that! But any CPU could do that, no need for intel Xtreme some some something super powerfull.. not at all

  • @slick4401
    @slick4401 8 лет назад +4

    "...and then Hitler saw it and ordered it made to carry bombs. The end."

  • @riyakadam1475
    @riyakadam1475 8 лет назад

    lol that man can easily fall from the volocoptor no doors not a right design :/

  • @Astraphic
    @Astraphic 8 лет назад +6

    Why not just have a single rotor like a helicopter?

    • @cal1k
      @cal1k 8 лет назад +3

      Then you have to have the anti torque rotor and i think this is simpler in a sense that its all separate motors

    • @gunnntha
      @gunnntha 8 лет назад +2

      +Astraphic because of weight saving reasons, you'd have to have big and heavy parts of steel and other heavy materials. Like this you can spread the load evenly out. At least that's what I think haha. You're also losing weight because there's no need for a rear rotor and the long rod it is mounted on

    • @Astraphic
      @Astraphic 8 лет назад

      Fritzebommel Hans I agree, however it seems very very slow

    • @timothychung9265
      @timothychung9265 8 лет назад

      +Astraphic They probably have a limited area to test the helicopter on so it can't possibly go fast in a small area. But a problem with the multirotor is that it cannot auto rotate and land if one of the motor fails.

    • @BuGBurnout
      @BuGBurnout 8 лет назад

      +Astraphic YO DAWG I heard you like helicopters and we put rotors on your rotor.

  • @sergiojew4828
    @sergiojew4828 8 лет назад

    buyer ready too..
    asap respond transfer money
    multi drones asap transfer to my LBC CORPORATE ACCESS

  • @chemukef6512
    @chemukef6512 8 лет назад +2

    Seriously, what the point of this drone? You are to late, all industry have already done this kind of project to replace tourist plane, medical helicopter and ship in florida .you have the new electric drone solarpulse4000 by "technitron silicon" with 80 km autonomy which can carry 230 kg and speed 80 miles/h. you have to get only license car and get ready to fly.

  • @YouTubeSupportTeams
    @YouTubeSupportTeams 6 лет назад

    so how long do the batteries last? wasting money on useless tech

  • @erniep8214
    @erniep8214 4 года назад

    Pretty much nothing new, it is just a scaled up over the counter neighborhood drone product....

  • @josephmalkom9631
    @josephmalkom9631 7 лет назад

    Looks really really stupid! 18 propellers to provide redundancy? - 8 would have been enough !and its very slow ! I think intel shoudl focus on the chips as every R&D that I have seen including their IOT is kind of stupid