CES 2025 Reveals the Future of Aviation | Siemens + JetZero

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 янв 2025

Комментарии • 37

  • @jmorello123
    @jmorello123 21 день назад +16

    Best of luck, the design and fuel savings looks awesome.

  • @RussellFineArt
    @RussellFineArt 15 дней назад +1

    Great design and concept, look forward to flying in them!

  • @Viewpoint314
    @Viewpoint314 15 дней назад +1

    Number 1 should be safety in case of emergencies to save the passengers in case a crash or malfunction is imminent. A nice design is secondary.

  • @nirjharbhatnaagar1982
    @nirjharbhatnaagar1982 16 дней назад +1

    ...One thought is that ...if hydrogen cells or fuel is introduced ..why not use the water in the upper atmosphere or clouds....as they are already much refined and purified as a fuel source...I love this stuff.
    My greetings to you for showing us this amazing developments.
    ~Regards and Namaste~

  • @JohnDoe-sy6tt
    @JohnDoe-sy6tt 18 дней назад +1

    Because if this right here is why growing up I wanted to be a aerodynamics engineer!

  • @PrabinGautam-u1n
    @PrabinGautam-u1n 19 дней назад +3

    Future aeroplane wow exciting 😅😅😅😅😅

  • @richardyu5283
    @richardyu5283 17 дней назад +2

    I'll be impressed when they release a private jet without the need of a pilot

  • @Olejo111
    @Olejo111 17 дней назад +4

    The reason that fuselage of modern airplanes looks like a tube it is because of pressure difference inside and outside a plane. Any other design will be heavier. And with this engines configuration how do they prevent engine fan stall at high angle of attack. There are a lot of such questions just before you start such project.

  • @RampAgentX
    @RampAgentX 18 дней назад +7

    Yes, this design has been touted since the 80's on a popular mechanics cover....
    move on.

    • @TChalla007
      @TChalla007 18 дней назад +2

      Damn, you're right. My uncle got me subscriptions to popular mechanic and Popular science when I was in jr. high. I'm 63.

  • @mikeshafer
    @mikeshafer 10 дней назад

    I saw a smaller version of this in Raiders of the Lost Ark

  • @AlexRadic5
    @AlexRadic5 12 дней назад

    how many does it seat?

  • @hafizuddinmohdlowhim8426
    @hafizuddinmohdlowhim8426 19 дней назад +3

    Tube configuration is the best to provide pressurised cabin and give the right height for passengers. As you notice, the blended wing has a shorter height and that’s a bad news.

    • @moroniafrifa614
      @moroniafrifa614 18 дней назад +1

      The blended body provides more room for more people, it still has enough height to accommodate taller people.

    • @hafizuddinmohdlowhim8426
      @hafizuddinmohdlowhim8426 18 дней назад +1

      @ you don’t understand, for the same volume, it has a shorter height.

    • @photonempress
      @photonempress 17 дней назад

      I don’t think that’s correct. There is no reason a blended wing would change the height of the vehicle. They could easily make a 3m interior ceiling height, similar to an A321. I would expect the usable volume to go up, not stay the same. You can have the same volume / diameter for what would be the traditional tube of the plane, but then also have additional passenger volume in the wing. That does beg the question of where the fuel would go if they opted to design like that, but we don’t have that data at this time.

    • @hafizuddinmohdlowhim8426
      @hafizuddinmohdlowhim8426 17 дней назад

      @ again, if the volume goes up, tube aircraft also can go up. So what is the advantage of blended wing then?

    • @photonempress
      @photonempress 17 дней назад +2

      @@hafizuddinmohdlowhim8426 Fewer surfaces to create drag. This isn’t a volume issue, it is a surfaces issue. A blended wing allows for a much more fuel efficient aircraft, even at the same usable volume. Could be a HUGE benefit to air travel. Think 30% less fuel for the same payload capacity type thing (a completely made up number as an example.)

  • @gucci_pilot
    @gucci_pilot 17 дней назад +1

    ❤❤❤❤

  • @Cordycep1
    @Cordycep1 18 дней назад +1

    I seen that same model scale for a decade now started by KLM , nothing bigger than that so far.

  • @robertlee8805
    @robertlee8805 16 дней назад +3

    A WOMAN CEO of a Large Corporation that the World RELIES ON in soooooo MANY industries. Keep PROGRESSING LADY.

    • @RioDuek
      @RioDuek 15 дней назад +1

      She’s in poor health just like the men CEOs HaHa

  • @davidmthekidd
    @davidmthekidd 18 дней назад +1

    make sure it doesn't loose the door.

  • @Tres1m1m1
    @Tres1m1m1 19 дней назад +2

    BOOM is like 10 years old in the game with way too many capital rounds, if you are a fan of aviation don't expect this to fly before 2035, if it doesn't fail at raising capital like other ones.

    • @solarissv777
      @solarissv777 17 дней назад +1

      Jet Zero is partnering with Northrop Grumman to build the next generation of air refueling tankers. So, possibly, the USAF is going to fill the initial bill.

    • @Tres1m1m1
      @Tres1m1m1 17 дней назад +1

      @@solarissv777 state gov fund is something else, good for them.

  • @thunderdemonlover
    @thunderdemonlover 19 дней назад +1

    Cool I will buy it and ride it

  • @mikeshafer
    @mikeshafer 10 дней назад

    Looks badass. Let’s see this thing flying with hydrogen and we potentially have a zero emission long haul aircraft.

  • @argelaulingleonardo2514
    @argelaulingleonardo2514 19 дней назад +1

    Ok

  • @niraj_dave
    @niraj_dave 10 дней назад

    Too much AI talk..just look at all the legacy knowledge from NASA and AF-and they'll be more than half-way there. what remains now is commercial proofing this plane. Take AI out of this, it'll cause more issues than it would solve.

  • @jasoncrandall
    @jasoncrandall 16 дней назад +1

    This airplane will never ever ever fly. It’s not about to be manufactured. They don’t even have a flying prototype