ZWO Cooled vs uncooled cameras

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 8

  • @gewglesux
    @gewglesux 3 года назад

    Thanks Dan!!

  • @jamesw5713
    @jamesw5713 2 года назад

    Great explanation.

  • @NoodleFlames
    @NoodleFlames 2 года назад +1

    Nice, now I know getting a cooled version wasn’t just a waste of money

    • @AstroWorldTV
      @AstroWorldTV  2 года назад

      If you’re doing long exposures cooled cameras are definitely advantageous!!!

  • @michaeledmonds3027
    @michaeledmonds3027 2 года назад

    So other than saving money, why choose the uncooled version? The obvious answer to me is shooting on cold nights might not have an advantage. I bought a ZWO 183MC for the moon, planets and other bright objects. Mistake? Thanks for further information.

    • @AstroWorldTV
      @AstroWorldTV  2 года назад

      Hi Mike,
      A cooled camera is never a mistake. There is always an advantage to having the capability to regulate temperature. However, for planetary/lunar/solar there may be better choices with faster frames per second. You may find that taking video of planets and other solar system objects taking video is more beneficial than single exposures. For planetary try the 462/224/290 and 174 for solar
      Hope that helps
      Dan