@@joecrumpet I don't know dan personally, but I've been watching him since screen junkies, and he seems like a pretty genuine guy. Even if somebody had said a phrase he used beforehand, this is one RUclipsr I would give the benefit of the doubt to.
I think a great way to describe the differences between Craig's run as Bond and the other actors who have played Bond is this: Craig's films told us the story of James Bond, while the Connery, Moore, Dalton and Brosnan films told us the missions of 007.
There's Lazenby of course with his one film, but it's an important one for the series/Bond's character nonetheless. But yeah, it's cool viewing the Craig films like that.
You know Dan, I choose to believe the thumbnail is real. That you put on a tux, stood in front of a mirror, practiced that pose and then took the picture. I choose believe the picture is canon.
@@12jswilson I wish it worked like that. Unfortunately Casino Royale ends in a cliffhanger with several unsolved plot threads and No Time to Die continues straight from Spectre. You can't have the good without the bad.
@@Nimajneb42069 My main issue with it is how handwavily they reveal that SPECTRE was behind *everyone and everything.* Feels so ridiculous, it immediately shattered my suspension of disbelief.
Best. Intro. Ever! Was that meow live or added in post? Been looking forward to your take knowing your Bond interest. Curious about this…but maybe even more curious where things go from here.
Just got home with dried tears. İsn't it strange how some Bond movies (stories) are in some way connected well with what's going on in the world's current events?
Yeah…James Bond had to save the world from the release of a virus that left/ was taken from a secured lab, and engineered and manipulated to kill some while having no effect on others (asymptotic). What’s even weirder is that the original release date was November 2019. Definitely sounds like a current event.
For me, "No Time to Die" is a very low-ranking film in the series. It ranks near the bottom for me. I would actually [gasp!] rank "Die Another Day" higher than No Time to Die. Only Quantum of Solace might be worse.
Hi Dan. Total side note, but I noticed the little box with the kitty hole in your bookshelf and I was inspired to go get one for my kitty. The IKEA folks should offer some sponsorship to you. Thanks!😀
@@G00N3R7883 her and victoria pedretti are my fav actresses of the past few yrs, the roles they choose, their acting, extremely talented and I can't wait to see where ana's big screen career goes, victoria as well can't wait to see her get into the film industry.
only Ana de Armas really delivers Naomi Harris only spit exposition Lynch was underused and underwritten aspecially in the 2nd Half and Lea Seydoux had 0 Chemistry with Daniel Craig
@@DisasterArtist1997 100% agree. Although the Moneypenny character was never meant to be an integral part of the movies. But yeah, the female 007 was seriously underwriten
I've been wanting to pass on this one with sadness, but your review is making me want to show my girl Casino Royale and go watch this movie at this giant IMAX 45 minutes away lol. Most of the reviews are filled with spoilers, you managed to avoid big spoilers and articulated your thoughts very well. You've convinced me, keep it coming!
I don't think it's true that Dalton's movies were "mediocre-ly received". If memory serves, The Living Daylights was a hit in 1987, in large part because a youthful Dalton taking over the role after Moore had creaked along for several movies gave the franchise new life. Dalton is an underrated Bond that doesn't always get the credit he deserves.
For those of you who didn't like the way No Time To Die ended, here's the simple solution: whenever you re-watch the Craig era, finish at Spectre. That could feasibly work as a final film too.
Craig: No Time To Die Brosnan responed: well then, I guess I Die Another Day Dalton said: make it on The Living Daylight Moore chiming in: it will be A View to Kill
Yeah I really love how his 5 films told one big story with a definite beginning, middle and end. I agree it makes his movies stand out from the rest of the Bond films. They should wait at least 10 years before starting a new Bond series, although that's probably too long a wait for a movie studio to sit on. I'm wondering if they possibly planted the seed (somewhat literally) for doing a whole different type of Bond movie in the future. One that could provide an interesting twist while still maintaining the Bond name.
They'll probably hold off until next year (Barbara Broccoli, Eon Productions & co) to start thinking about and assessing who they're going to cast next in the role, and then it might take as long as 1 or even 2 MORE years before they even have found the right director for the first film with the new actor, along with the full, finished script. And, then, they'll head into production. And that'll take roughly 2 more years, or something like that probably. So, judging by that guesstimate alone, that would be around 1+1+2+2 = 6 years. So maybe about 5-6 years, or something like that - just because of the initial wait to make any decisions (they want to take their time with this, clearly, no rushed decisions whatsoever), plus all of the development phases before they'll even get to the actual production of the first film. So, at the very, very least, in my opinion - we won't see a new Bond film before 4 years have passed. So maybe 4-6. So don't worry - even if they *technically* won't go on any "hiatus", they'll definitely take their time, and it'll be a good while before we see the next one anyways. So, I guess everyone wins, regardless of their personal preference on the matter :-)
@@Rand0mN0rwegianGuy you’re right, I stand corrected. 6 years is a good length of time for a new Bond. I hope they pick a great actor, although nobody can replace Craig just like nobody ever replaced Connery. Different styles.
@@whitealliance9540 but he's old. I love him for the role... But maybe 10 years ago. Reboot again and use someone younger. What about John Boyega? Maybe we could go back to campy fun with him
@@PineappleConvention I don’t really see Boyega in the role. I think the only race swap that would conceivably work for bond is Idris Elba. I actually think that Boyega would be good in a “Kingsman” type movie if he brought the same energy as he had in “Attack The Block”. He’s great but a bad fit for Bond
Speaking of explainers, Dan, I really miss yours! You and Lon used to do a fantastic job of them - but I realize they are probably huge projects which you no longer have the time to devote yourself to.
I know! Those were such fun that I watched them even when I had no interest in the IP itself and no plans to watch the movie they were in preparation for. On the other hand, I ended up watching GoT because I enjoyed the Cram It so much! I really miss those.
When it comes to Craig Bonds, the formula is reliable.. every even number Bond sucks, every odd numbered film is excellent. Also i like Lea Seydoux but let just say i was much more convinced by Eva Green as Vesper being the one to make Bond leave it all behind, than for Madeline Swan.
I couldn’t agree more about Madeline. I actually found myself actively questioning in my head, WHY did he so particularly fall in love with her? In two movies worth, I can’t think of anything special, personality-wise or story-wise, that would make Bond fall for her in particular. Their relationship felt so superficial and forced to me. I remember feeling it was weird at the end of Spectre when he drives off with her. For how wasted Monica Bellucci was in that movie, I feel like it really should have been her character that Bond formed the connection with and ended up with. There probably would have been way more chemistry between Craig and Bellucci than there was between him and Seydoux. It would have felt like a more mature relationship too that was motivating Bond to mature, with her not being like 20 years younger than him.
Misses The Mark in a big way-The filmmakers seem to think that the only way they can make the female protagonist look good is to make Bond look like a fool who can't make wise decisions or shoot and fight with any kind of skill anymore. It wants to be like the classic On Her Majesty's Secret Service but literally misses the mark because of its patchwork quilt composition of set pieces and the underlying propaganda.
So should there be a "The Dan-cut" version of NTtD? While lumpy, I (really) enjoy enough of QoS that it lands as my 2nd favorite of the Daniel Craig Bond movies - yeah I said it.
I will say that Casino and Quantum are the only Craig Bond films that you are not really bored at any point (since Quantum is mercifully short). But Skyfall is a very beautiful movie so it might just pip it to 2nd place for me.
I'm a Bond fan since childhood. Saw the movie last night and... This movie was the greatest deception I had in years on the cinema. For me, Daniel Craig's era should have finished in Spectre.
LOVED IT. Classic feel. Emotional James Bond movie. Risks! No Time To Die hit the same notes On Her Majesty's Secret Service did years ago.. literally using the same soundtrack. lol So the Ending was no shocker to me. Appreciated ♥️
I'd like to see Bond have a resurgence across other media before an official new Bond is cast for the films. We need a break, and the character needs to be re-established
I’d be surprised if EON did that. We’ve already had a huge break, in part thanks to the pandemic. And they’ve already confirmed the hunt for the new Bond begins next year. Seems like we’ll get a new one sooner rather than later.
Daniel Craig is an excellent Bond. It's hard to say he's the best because he brought some edge and weariness to the role that put a new spin on the character, but was still true to the essence of Bond. He will be missed. I'm sure the way he went out is an issue for some, but I thought Craig delivered in terms of performance.
Dan, what was your overall impression of Cary Joji Fukunaga’s direction? Part of the reason I’m excited for this movie is his involvement. I’m a huge fan of his work on True Detective season 1, and I’m hoping his talent shows here in this film.
I thought it was not only one of the best looking Bond's, but one of the best shot action films I've seen. Beautifully framed and lit, as there's a long shot with virtually no cuts near the climax that so reminded of my favourite scene from S1 True Detective in it's direction. Loved the film, even if I have an issue with how it's ended.
Three RIPS in the Bond franchise: 1. Sean Connery the quintessential on-screen character actor, 2. Roger Moore as the cheeky self-parody version, and of course 3. the love-letter farewell in No Time To Die where a bunch of nostalgia is remembered and a few key characters do in fact DIE, including 007 Bond himself. Good luck if/when the producers try to get it back in 1-2-3-5-10 years.
@@nrgspike In the end it really comes down to the cast, especially Bond girls. The problems with Skyfall and No time to die are Bardem and Malek, two horrible casting choices.
@@chrish7 I agree with you on Bardem. But it's more the type of villain for me - in CR and QoS, they were the kind of real-world scumbags that actually exist. No megalomaniacal plans of world domination, just the desire to make a profit irrespective of the harm they cause. That changed with Skyfall, we went back to the monologue-ing villains of yore; which is fine, but we've had 20 of those films already. Craig's Bond was on a far more interesting trajectory appropriate for 2010's, but it seemed like the producers lost their nerve and went full fan-service, resulting in the last three decidedly mediocre efforts.
I don't know. I never felt Daniel Craig to be like the "classic" Bond. Too much Jason Borne. The other Bonds are smoother and use less knuckles to resolve all issues. But as action movies, they were okay.
I'm waiting for them to put out a full Craig set on 4k in order to re-watch them in order so I'll refresh myself via youtube then go into this one at the theater. I'm interested to see if I change my opinion on the movie doing this.
The movie was a Masterpiece. It had all the elements that made me fall in love with the franchise. The Daniel Craig treatise of the Bond character was brilliantly orchestrated by allowing the audience to witness his growth and humanity. Not gonna lie - did not see the ending, coming. As a formidable fan, l would openly brag about having seen EVERY film in the franchise, (even the David Niven spoof) at least 5 times! All the other films left me feeling energized and eager for the next installation. Dare I say, the ending to "No Time to Die" was more like a love letter to fans, conveying Craig's thanks and appreciation for supporting him, as the timeless character "James Bond". Unlike other characters, perhaps overstaying their welcome, (akin to a Boxer who's warrior spirit flame is never extinguished, even though everyone else knows it's overtime) this time, this Bond, is going out on his own terms! Bravo! I absolutely loved it and was saddened at the same time! Damn you, Craig! I guess dialogue in the FILM said it best of '007', "it's just a Number." Another character can carry the "number", but how will the Franchise and future characters carry the "name"? Interesting dilemma for writers, but makes clear, we won't see Craig, as Bond again. Big Ups though...through-out, Craig. Absolutely One of the Best Who Ever Did it, and Got Away Wit It!
It's interesting that you said there's no time in the movie for everything to have it's place, and then complained that the movie is too long. That's a bit contradictory. I disagree about both statements. I thought they tied up all the loose ends and the movie moved forward like a snowball rolling downhill and I didn't spend the movie watching the clock. When the credits rolled, I was surprised almost 3 hours had passed and I was pleasantly surprised that it redeemed the mess that spectre left us with. I loved this movie
two things can be true. the film can definitely add unnecessary dialogue and action and not give the main characters enough time to build themselves which will leave plot holes. also if your standard is redeeming Spectre, that's not difficult to do with all the terrible action, writing, and acting.
I have only seen reviews, and not the film. Your words are more positive that others. The statement bond dies, so the rehashing of Dallas for the return of bobby for bond? The initial trailers and the suggestion for the woman? Your thoughts and feelings.
Just watched for myself. Hell of a cinematic experience. Loved every minute of it, and you were the first reviewer I came to afterwards to hear your thoughts!!!!
Craig's era=best Bond, best Bond films, hands down. My order, from best to not so much: Skyfall Casino Royale Spectre Quantum of Solace No Time To Die My reasoning for NTTD: I have to blame it on the screenplay. The "formula/structure" of the Craig era films was completely turned on its head. We get "Bond in love," retired, and always chaperoned by another (predominantly female) agent or character. Craig's Bond had always been cold and emotionally indifferent, but this was a very different portrayal. It definitely didn't have enough action sequences (especially for the extended length), and most of the supporting cast didn't seem really "into" their roles. Malek's portrayal wasn't as strong as I would have hoped, and of course, there is the ending. Still a decent film: great looking cinematography, IMAX utilized, and I can't wait to pick it up on 4K in December. It was the first film since the pandemic to get me into a theater. Everyone should go see it, not least out of respect for what Craig gave us in all those years of commitment to the role.
I am a massive Bond fan and was going to see it today as it released yesterday here in New Zealand. But my region just went into lockdown so I'm very much annoyed with that! Thanks for the review Dan, I'm looking forward to it.
So, today I watched No Time to Die for the first time. I've been spending the entire summer watching all the Bond films for the first time (I've never seen a single one prior to this summer). And I know so many people love this movie, but I really only enjoyed the third act. The first two did nothing to me, and honestly dragged on and on. Watching all 25 canon Bond films in such a short amount of time, you realize how repetitive and formulaic they are, and as a writer, that drove me up a wall. You mention the double-crosses. Oh my gosh, I got so sick and tired of them! How many Bond movies have a double-cross? I count at least eight, and I'm sure there are ones I'm forgetting. Maybe I should only watch the Craig Bond movies going forward, but I was just so burnt out on this series by the time I got to No Time to Die.
I don't like rating movies that way, because it immediately becomes a comparison. "Oh, you gave x movie a B but y movie a B+?" - it just further dilutes the real purpose of criticism, in my eyes. But, if you're interested, I do give films a numerical grade (although I don't agonize over it) on Rotten Tomatoes.
@@DanMurrellMovies Ok. Just some kind of grade gives the audience on what level you think about a movie. Glad you give a numerical grade. Maybe you can have fun with it and give something like a _Pass, Watch at Home, or Worth the Ticket Price_ . People tend to not get too angry with that type of rating. BTW What is your favorite movie decade 70s, 80s, 90s. Just will like to know.
EXCELLENT REVIEW!!! And not a single spoiler in sight -- good job! Part of me thinks they should have split the plots into two movies, filmed simultaneously and released consecutively, but it probably would have watered the end result down and lessened how good this one wound up being. Also agree that while James Bond WILL return, one does have to ask.. should he? Too soon to tell, and I'd like to see them sit on this for awhile before "rebooting" the franchise. Maybe start with someone really young and go deep into them becoming the Super Secret Spy we all know and love. Thinking I'd like to see Regé-Jean Page give the role a shot, but introducing Lashana Lynch in NTTD makes that kinda awkward now, eh?
Lol at the half-chair turn and FF shade. I agree. The movie should have removed the new bond role and focus more on the main characters, especially the villain.
Can anyone actually follow up w/ James Bond after that ending? Dan said he wasn't sure if James Bond should come back again after this, and I think the writers had the same idea. But not in the same way Dan means.
If by some miracle Henry Cavill actually did get cast as James Bond, and have as good a debut as Casino Royale was for Craig, the transition to a new Bond could be as smooth as silk. But I honestly hope they drop the idea of having an actor's entire run be part of some ongoing arc, especially if they are going to retroactively try to tie-in events that from the prior films and novels were not related in any way. It's for reasons like that that Casino Royale and Skyfall have probably been rewatched infinitely more times than the other Craig Bond films.
Great video. There are some reviews out there saying this movie changed the character, that is woke. They dont. Its the same Bond of Casino Royale. This Bond always have been like this. The character has an arc in these movies and this one doesnt betray that road. Maybe the end will create some debate ( iam still dont know if i agree with it) but iam sure that this movie is way better than Brosnan last movie or any last Bond movie from any other actor. By far.
I've been a big Bond fan for 30 years and I absolutely loved No Time To Die. I'll have to see it again to properly know where I'd rank it, but it could be at the very top of the list. There are several amazing action scenes, Bond's mission has big stakes, and Bond's personal story was fantastic. I think that last point is why I'll now say that Daniel Craig is my favourite Bond. I've liked all the actors, but whereas I've enjoyed the others as spies or action heroes, Craig's Bond is the first that really made me care about him as a person. The main point where I'll disagree with Dan's NTTD review is about the length. I hate when movie critics do this, it seems like any time a film is more than 2 hours they always say "its too long". I was never bored and I never looked at my watch. I watched all of Craig's Bond movies over 2 weeks before going to see No Time To Die. Really great series, Quantum of Solace is definately the weak point, for me its because of the shaky camera and fast editing in the action scenes, I can't tell what is happening. First time I saw Spectre I was underwhelmed, not terrible but not great. However, I do think that No Time To Die makes Spectre better because of the storylines and character development that continued. Its almost like a 2 part story, now the story is complete, part 1 makes more sense.
I absolutely loved this movie, I’m so glad it’s so good because Daniel Craig deserved a good send off. He made me love James Bond, I also think that all Craig’s Bond movies will be appreciated even more with time. Telling a complex story over the span of 15 years will pay off in decades to come.
I wasn't sure, because it happened so fast, but I thought I saw a cameo that may have hinted at who the new Bond is going to be, or at least a wink to those who have been clamoring for it.
I was feeling similar in regards to Batman, but the Robert Pattison trailer dropped and now I'm all-in in that vision If a director sincerely wants to show us something we haven't seen before I trust that
I agree with a lot of the overall sentiment of this review, except for in regards to the length. I didn't think this film felt as long as it is at all, in contrast with Spectre where I very much felt the length. I thought this movie was very well paced and never dragged. Also, I'd say Spectre is the weakest of the bunch as I think Quantum of Solace has overlooked value within the series, but in any case, I've really enjoyed Craig's tenure.
Daniel Craig is the Christian Bale of the Bond Franchise. His Bond films are The Dark Knight Trilogy of the franchise. Craig made Bond, dark, gritty and a believable character again. He brought the franchise back to it's roots. Just like Christian Bale and Christopher Nolan did with the Batman character. Casino Royale is the Bond version of Batman Begins. It gave fresh new life to the Bond Franchise, and brought it back from the goofiness and the over the top galore of Die Another Day. Just like Batman Begins did it after the backlash with Batman & Robin. Craig made the Bond films, dark, believable and realistic again. Also you could say that No Time to Die is the Bond version of The Dark Knight Rises. As Bond sacrifices himself to save the world just like Batman did it in The Dark Knight Rises. Both the Bond and Batman films have had a similar evolution in tone and depiction. By initially starting off as dark and gritty, then becoming camp and over the top. Then becoming dark, grounded, realistic and serious in tone again.
*spoiler alert* There were some really weird beats in the third act with the villain. We don't even know who those "buyers" were, hence the urgency felt artificial. The villain just let the little girl leave without any motive, nor did he even look for the girl's mom, a point that caused the negotiation to break down. He was just "going somewhere", but somehow ended up being all alone to fight with Bond, and his motive and dialogue to support his vision were really hard to justify.
"old school bond in a jason bourne world" I hope you gave yourself a pat on the back for that one. great line!
He copied it from another RUclipsr
I didn’t, actually. We may have used the same phrase but I don’t plagiarize
More like James Bond in a xXx or Charlie's Angels world.
@@joecrumpet I've heard that said since Bourne came out.
@@joecrumpet I don't know dan personally, but I've been watching him since screen junkies, and he seems like a pretty genuine guy. Even if somebody had said a phrase he used beforehand, this is one RUclipsr I would give the benefit of the doubt to.
I think a great way to describe the differences between Craig's run as Bond and the other actors who have played Bond is this: Craig's films told us the story of James Bond, while the Connery, Moore, Dalton and Brosnan films told us the missions of 007.
Valid
Well said
There's Lazenby of course with his one film, but it's an important one for the series/Bond's character nonetheless. But yeah, it's cool viewing the Craig films like that.
You know Dan, I choose to believe the thumbnail is real. That you put on a tux, stood in front of a mirror, practiced that pose and then took the picture. I choose believe the picture is canon.
Casino Royale. Skyfall and then No time to Die is such a solid bond trilogy!
Good thing those were the only 3 they made with Craig. Well done , Eon!
@@12jswilson I wish it worked like that. Unfortunately Casino Royale ends in a cliffhanger with several unsolved plot threads and No Time to Die continues straight from Spectre. You can't have the good without the bad.
blofeld being related to bond was garbage. but I loved Spectre overall. don't really get the hate.
@@crobeastness I really don’t get the spectre hate either and this movie would not have the same impact if you didn’t watch it
@@Nimajneb42069 My main issue with it is how handwavily they reveal that SPECTRE was behind *everyone and everything.* Feels so ridiculous, it immediately shattered my suspension of disbelief.
Best. Intro. Ever!
Was that meow live or added in post? Been looking forward to your take knowing your Bond interest. Curious about this…but maybe even more curious where things go from here.
Just got home with dried tears. İsn't it strange how some Bond movies (stories) are in some way connected well with what's going on in the world's current events?
Yeah…James Bond had to save the world from the release of a virus that left/ was taken from a secured lab, and engineered and manipulated to kill some while having no effect on others (asymptotic). What’s even weirder is that the original release date was November 2019. Definitely sounds like a current event.
For me, "No Time to Die" is a very low-ranking film in the series. It ranks near the bottom for me. I would actually [gasp!] rank "Die Another Day" higher than No Time to Die. Only Quantum of Solace might be worse.
So basically:
Casino Royale and Skyfall = Great
No Time to Die = Good
Spectre = Meh
Quantum of Solace = Bad
The Living Daylights and Licence to Kill are not mediocre. Two of the Best Bond movies. Dalton's the man
*mediocrely received*
This is one of most anticipated movies to see this year. It’s been a long wait since the original release date.
Hi Dan. Total side note, but I noticed the little box with the kitty hole in your bookshelf and I was inspired to go get one for my kitty. The IKEA folks should offer some sponsorship to you. Thanks!😀
I love Daniel Craig bond because he added alot of dimension to James bond. He's the perfect modern bond
If you miss a great cinematic experience, definitely go watch this.
I don't usually make comments on RUclips, but that intro, throw-back alone caused me to pause, laugh, & give a thumbs up!
The women in these movies my god, just appreciating beauty and talent 😍
I would definately watch Ana De Armis' character in a solo film.
@@G00N3R7883 her and victoria pedretti are my fav actresses of the past few yrs, the roles they choose, their acting, extremely talented and I can't wait to see where ana's big screen career goes, victoria as well can't wait to see her get into the film industry.
only Ana de Armas really delivers
Naomi Harris only spit exposition
Lynch was underused and underwritten aspecially in the 2nd Half
and Lea Seydoux had 0 Chemistry with Daniel Craig
@@DisasterArtist1997 100% agree. Although the Moneypenny character was never meant to be an integral part of the movies. But yeah, the female 007 was seriously underwriten
@@DisasterArtist1997 Ana de Armas's segment was so fun. I honestly don't care much for No time to Die, but i enjoyed that part a lot
I've been wanting to pass on this one with sadness, but your review is making me want to show my girl Casino Royale and go watch this movie at this giant IMAX 45 minutes away lol. Most of the reviews are filled with spoilers, you managed to avoid big spoilers and articulated your thoughts very well. You've convinced me, keep it coming!
He forgot to mention Harrison Ford's love and dedication to Indiana Jones!!!
I don't think it's true that Dalton's movies were "mediocre-ly received". If memory serves, The Living Daylights was a hit in 1987, in large part because a youthful Dalton taking over the role after Moore had creaked along for several movies gave the franchise new life. Dalton is an underrated Bond that doesn't always get the credit he deserves.
For those of you who didn't like the way No Time To Die ended, here's the simple solution: whenever you re-watch the Craig era, finish at Spectre.
That could feasibly work as a final film too.
Rami's villain was the weakest part of the film, even though I love him, and I feel like I could've watched another 30mins
Exactly. Safin was underwritten.
He sucked so did the film deeetie pie
@@gkroll8467 that's your shitty opinion. I liked the movie. It had it's issue but I liked it.
@@sudarshan1354 your a kid you know shit probably love Adam Sandler films living in ya parents basement
He sucked as a villain a snowflake
Craig: No Time To Die
Brosnan responed: well then, I guess I Die Another Day
Dalton said: make it on The Living Daylight
Moore chiming in: it will be A View to Kill
Connery: But you only live twice
Lazenby: Not while On Her Majesty's Secret Service
Yeah I really love how his 5 films told one big story with a definite beginning, middle and end. I agree it makes his movies stand out from the rest of the Bond films. They should wait at least 10 years before starting a new Bond series, although that's probably too long a wait for a movie studio to sit on. I'm wondering if they possibly planted the seed (somewhat literally) for doing a whole different type of Bond movie in the future. One that could provide an interesting twist while still maintaining the Bond name.
10 years is too long, maybe 4-5 years is a good wait.
They'll probably hold off until next year (Barbara Broccoli, Eon Productions & co) to start thinking about and assessing who they're going to cast next in the role, and then it might take as long as 1 or even 2 MORE years before they even have found the right director for the first film with the new actor, along with the full, finished script. And, then, they'll head into production. And that'll take roughly 2 more years, or something like that probably.
So, judging by that guesstimate alone, that would be around 1+1+2+2 = 6 years.
So maybe about 5-6 years, or something like that - just because of the initial wait to make any decisions (they want to take their time with this, clearly, no rushed decisions whatsoever), plus all of the development phases before they'll even get to the actual production of the first film.
So, at the very, very least, in my opinion - we won't see a new Bond film before 4 years have passed. So maybe 4-6.
So don't worry - even if they *technically* won't go on any "hiatus", they'll definitely take their time, and it'll be a good while before we see the next one anyways. So, I guess everyone wins, regardless of their personal preference on the matter :-)
@@Rand0mN0rwegianGuy you’re right, I stand corrected. 6 years is a good length of time for a new Bond. I hope they pick a great actor, although nobody can replace Craig just like nobody ever replaced Connery. Different styles.
If the biggest weakness is the length, I consider that a win. As long as the story is great, I'd be willing to sit there for 4 hours.
I'm voting for Richard Madden to be the next James Bond .... he's Scottish, he resembles Sean Connery and he knows how to brood
Damn. You know what. I don't think I've heard that before but I'm down for it
@@whitealliance9540 Don't you think Idris Elba is a little bit too old for the role? He is only 4 years younger then Craig.
Considering he’s gonna have to be one million MCU movies soon, I really don’t think that’s likely.
@@whitealliance9540 but he's old. I love him for the role... But maybe 10 years ago. Reboot again and use someone younger. What about John Boyega? Maybe we could go back to campy fun with him
@@PineappleConvention I don’t really see Boyega in the role. I think the only race swap that would conceivably work for bond is Idris Elba. I actually think that Boyega would be good in a “Kingsman” type movie if he brought the same energy as he had in “Attack The Block”. He’s great but a bad fit for Bond
A very good cat appearance. 5 stars!
Speaking of explainers, Dan, I really miss yours! You and Lon used to do a fantastic job of them - but I realize they are probably huge projects which you no longer have the time to devote yourself to.
I know! Those were such fun that I watched them even when I had no interest in the IP itself and no plans to watch the movie they were in preparation for. On the other hand, I ended up watching GoT because I enjoyed the Cram It so much! I really miss those.
@@ellicel Same here! I recommend them to people all the time.
BOND NEEDS TO GO BACK TO THE 60s
I miss when Screen Junkies did CRAM IT! for all these beloved series. We could use one for all the Daniel Craig movies.
When it comes to Craig Bonds, the formula is reliable.. every even number Bond sucks, every odd numbered film is excellent. Also i like Lea Seydoux but let just say i was much more convinced by Eva Green as Vesper being the one to make Bond leave it all behind, than for Madeline Swan.
I couldn’t agree more about Madeline. I actually found myself actively questioning in my head, WHY did he so particularly fall in love with her? In two movies worth, I can’t think of anything special, personality-wise or story-wise, that would make Bond fall for her in particular. Their relationship felt so superficial and forced to me. I remember feeling it was weird at the end of Spectre when he drives off with her. For how wasted Monica Bellucci was in that movie, I feel like it really should have been her character that Bond formed the connection with and ended up with. There probably would have been way more chemistry between Craig and Bellucci than there was between him and Seydoux. It would have felt like a more mature relationship too that was motivating Bond to mature, with her not being like 20 years younger than him.
Misses The Mark in a big way-The filmmakers seem to think that the only way they can make the female protagonist look good is to make Bond look like a fool who can't make wise decisions or shoot and fight with any kind of skill anymore. It wants to be like the classic On Her Majesty's Secret Service but literally misses the mark because of its patchwork quilt composition of set pieces and the underlying propaganda.
I marathoned the Craig ones beforehand and while I still didn't enjoy Spectre, it was very helpful going into the new one.
The thumbnail of this video is gold 🥇😆
Sean Connery is my favorite Bond but Casino Royale is my favorite Bond movie.
Yeah, David Niven was very underrated as James Bond.
So should there be a "The Dan-cut" version of NTtD? While lumpy, I (really) enjoy enough of QoS that it lands as my 2nd favorite of the Daniel Craig Bond movies - yeah I said it.
I will say that Casino and Quantum are the only Craig Bond films that you are not really bored at any point (since Quantum is mercifully short). But Skyfall is a very beautiful movie so it might just pip it to 2nd place for me.
Hats off to y0ur cat with a sad me0w
The only thing this film seriously missed was an in memoriam to Connery and Moore who both passed since the previous movie.
Diamonds Live Forever💎
I'm a Bond fan since childhood. Saw the movie last night and... This movie was the greatest deception I had in years on the cinema. For me, Daniel Craig's era should have finished in Spectre.
LOLZ, I needed that cold open. You big ol' dork! :-)
Just saw this movie and the oil painting of Judi Dench got me! Dan called this troupe way back when & I look for it in every franchise! XD
LOVED IT. Classic feel. Emotional James Bond movie. Risks! No Time To Die hit the same notes On Her Majesty's Secret Service did years ago.. literally using the same soundtrack. lol So the Ending was no shocker to me. Appreciated ♥️
I'd like to see Bond have a resurgence across other media before an official new Bond is cast for the films. We need a break, and the character needs to be re-established
I’d be surprised if EON did that. We’ve already had a huge break, in part thanks to the pandemic. And they’ve already confirmed the hunt for the new Bond begins next year. Seems like we’ll get a new one sooner rather than later.
Dan really enjoyed that opening scene and I loved that.
I already purchased no time to die on IMAX laser in AMC theater for the opening week on Friday.
Can anyone explain the cricket bat behind him?
Daniel Craig is an excellent Bond. It's hard to say he's the best because he brought some edge and weariness to the role that put a new spin on the character, but was still true to the essence of Bond. He will be missed. I'm sure the way he went out is an issue for some, but I thought Craig delivered in terms of performance.
i did a marathon craig bond over a weekend before seeing this, it really does help with the arc this character has. it does tie up some loose ends.
Hey Dan, could you do a James Bond ranking video with all the movies? Thanks
Dan, what was your overall impression of Cary Joji Fukunaga’s direction? Part of the reason I’m excited for this movie is his involvement. I’m a huge fan of his work on True Detective season 1, and I’m hoping his talent shows here in this film.
I thought it was not only one of the best looking Bond's, but one of the best shot action films I've seen. Beautifully framed and lit, as there's a long shot with virtually no cuts near the climax that so reminded of my favourite scene from S1 True Detective in it's direction. Loved the film, even if I have an issue with how it's ended.
Three RIPS in the Bond franchise: 1. Sean Connery the quintessential on-screen character actor, 2. Roger Moore as the cheeky self-parody version, and of course 3. the love-letter farewell in No Time To Die where a bunch of nostalgia is remembered and a few key characters do in fact DIE, including 007 Bond himself. Good luck if/when the producers try to get it back in 1-2-3-5-10 years.
The Meow of the cat was so perfectly timed…..!
Interesting how Quantum of Solace is the only Craig Bond film I liked.
People just like to shit on QoS and I don't understand why, it's a genuinely solid Bond film. But then people also hype Skyfall while I hated it.
@@nrgspike In the end it really comes down to the cast, especially Bond girls. The problems with Skyfall and No time to die are Bardem and Malek, two horrible casting choices.
@@chrish7 I agree with you on Bardem. But it's more the type of villain for me - in CR and QoS, they were the kind of real-world scumbags that actually exist. No megalomaniacal plans of world domination, just the desire to make a profit irrespective of the harm they cause. That changed with Skyfall, we went back to the monologue-ing villains of yore; which is fine, but we've had 20 of those films already. Craig's Bond was on a far more interesting trajectory appropriate for 2010's, but it seemed like the producers lost their nerve and went full fan-service, resulting in the last three decidedly mediocre efforts.
@@nrgspike you should be doing reviews, that's an awesome synopsis.
why didnt they use OHMSS' DBS instead of the V8 car?? would seem more appropriate..
The algorithm has worked in your favour, congratulations🥳
I don't know. I never felt Daniel Craig to be like the "classic" Bond. Too much Jason Borne. The other Bonds are smoother and use less knuckles to resolve all issues. But as action movies, they were okay.
The ending did not do justice to the Dainel Craig's Bond.
I'm waiting for them to put out a full Craig set on 4k in order to re-watch them in order so I'll refresh myself via youtube then go into this one at the theater. I'm interested to see if I change my opinion on the movie doing this.
definitely recommend rewatching Spectre before this one
Was waiting from this review before watching . Always loved Dan’s love and knowledge for the franchise.
I’d like to see a Cold War James Bond. I say take the series back to the 70’s
I am of the same mind, but I would go all the way to the 50s when the character was created.
The movie was a Masterpiece. It had all the elements that made me fall in love with the franchise. The Daniel Craig treatise of the Bond character was brilliantly orchestrated by allowing the audience to witness his growth and humanity. Not gonna lie - did not see the ending, coming. As a formidable fan, l would openly brag about having seen EVERY film in the franchise,
(even the David Niven spoof) at least 5 times! All the other films left me feeling energized and eager for the next installation.
Dare I say, the ending to "No Time to Die" was more like a love letter to fans, conveying Craig's thanks and appreciation for supporting him, as the timeless character "James Bond". Unlike other characters, perhaps overstaying their welcome,
(akin to a Boxer who's warrior spirit flame is never extinguished, even though everyone else knows it's overtime) this time, this Bond, is going out on his own terms! Bravo! I absolutely loved it and was saddened at the same time! Damn you, Craig!
I guess dialogue in the FILM said it best of '007', "it's just a Number." Another character can carry the "number", but how will the Franchise and future characters carry the "name"? Interesting dilemma for writers, but makes clear, we won't see Craig, as Bond again. Big Ups though...through-out, Craig. Absolutely One of the Best Who Ever Did it, and Got Away Wit It!
I felt the same about not buying at all that Bond would drop everything for her at end of Spectre
I'd love for you to do a video on your choices for who you'd want to be the next Bond since you're such a huge fan
To clarify then, is "All My Movies" moving to the audio podcast, only?
So close to 100k! Great review!
I doesn’t give any hint what’s next for the future? I mean it’s pretty obvious they have to just reboot again
It's interesting that you said there's no time in the movie for everything to have it's place, and then complained that the movie is too long. That's a bit contradictory. I disagree about both statements. I thought they tied up all the loose ends and the movie moved forward like a snowball rolling downhill and I didn't spend the movie watching the clock. When the credits rolled, I was surprised almost 3 hours had passed and I was pleasantly surprised that it redeemed the mess that spectre left us with. I loved this movie
two things can be true. the film can definitely add unnecessary dialogue and action and not give the main characters enough time to build themselves which will leave plot holes. also if your standard is redeeming Spectre, that's not difficult to do with all the terrible action, writing, and acting.
We watch Bond Movies for excitement, and fun, Not drama!
Love how deep you go into the background info and the passion Dan! Didn't know you had your own channel. Been a Screen Junkie for years!
Could not agree more. Great review!
I have only seen reviews, and not the film. Your words are more positive that others. The statement bond dies,
so the rehashing of Dallas for the return of bobby for bond? The initial trailers and the suggestion for the woman?
Your thoughts and feelings.
Thanks Dan, as usual very objective and detailed reviews ! The BEST !
Just watched for myself. Hell of a cinematic experience. Loved every minute of it, and you were the first reviewer I came to afterwards to hear your thoughts!!!!
Craig's era=best Bond, best Bond films, hands down.
My order, from best to not so much:
Skyfall
Casino Royale
Spectre
Quantum of Solace
No Time To Die
My reasoning for NTTD: I have to blame it on the screenplay. The "formula/structure" of the Craig era films was completely turned on its head. We get "Bond in love," retired, and always chaperoned by another (predominantly female) agent or character. Craig's Bond had always been cold and emotionally indifferent, but this was a very different portrayal. It definitely didn't have enough action sequences (especially for the extended length), and most of the supporting cast didn't seem really "into" their roles. Malek's portrayal wasn't as strong as I would have hoped, and of course, there is the ending.
Still a decent film: great looking cinematography, IMAX utilized, and I can't wait to pick it up on 4K in December. It was the first film since the pandemic to get me into a theater. Everyone should go see it, not least out of respect for what Craig gave us in all those years of commitment to the role.
I am a massive Bond fan and was going to see it today as it released yesterday here in New Zealand. But my region just went into lockdown so I'm very much annoyed with that! Thanks for the review Dan, I'm looking forward to it.
I'm here for Ana de Armas
They need to reboot James Bond as a period piece, going back to the 60s.
That’s a good idea. Since they told an interconnected story here they need to do something big like that.
Will a 60s reboot be accepted in todays society? Norms in the 60s will definitely offend many of the PC community of today.
So, today I watched No Time to Die for the first time. I've been spending the entire summer watching all the Bond films for the first time (I've never seen a single one prior to this summer). And I know so many people love this movie, but I really only enjoyed the third act. The first two did nothing to me, and honestly dragged on and on. Watching all 25 canon Bond films in such a short amount of time, you realize how repetitive and formulaic they are, and as a writer, that drove me up a wall. You mention the double-crosses. Oh my gosh, I got so sick and tired of them! How many Bond movies have a double-cross? I count at least eight, and I'm sure there are ones I'm forgetting. Maybe I should only watch the Craig Bond movies going forward, but I was just so burnt out on this series by the time I got to No Time to Die.
Is the CRICKET BAT Bond related?
Thank You! Looking Forward to Your DUNE Review …
…
You should really think about a rating system. Either stars or letter grades. Just a suggestion.
I don't like rating movies that way, because it immediately becomes a comparison. "Oh, you gave x movie a B but y movie a B+?" - it just further dilutes the real purpose of criticism, in my eyes. But, if you're interested, I do give films a numerical grade (although I don't agonize over it) on Rotten Tomatoes.
@@DanMurrellMovies Ok. Just some kind of grade gives the audience on what level you think about a movie. Glad you give a numerical grade. Maybe you can have fun with it and give something like a _Pass, Watch at Home, or Worth the Ticket Price_ . People tend to not get too angry with that type of rating.
BTW What is your favorite movie decade 70s, 80s, 90s. Just will like to know.
OMG, Dan your kitty is just adorable 😻😻😻😻
EXCELLENT REVIEW!!! And not a single spoiler in sight -- good job! Part of me thinks they should have split the plots into two movies, filmed simultaneously and released consecutively, but it probably would have watered the end result down and lessened how good this one wound up being. Also agree that while James Bond WILL return, one does have to ask.. should he? Too soon to tell, and I'd like to see them sit on this for awhile before "rebooting" the franchise. Maybe start with someone really young and go deep into them becoming the Super Secret Spy we all know and love. Thinking I'd like to see Regé-Jean Page give the role a shot, but introducing Lashana Lynch in NTTD makes that kinda awkward now, eh?
Lol at the half-chair turn and FF shade.
I agree. The movie should have removed the new bond role and focus more on the main characters, especially the villain.
Can anyone actually follow up w/ James Bond after that ending? Dan said he wasn't sure if James Bond should come back again after this, and I think the writers had the same idea. But not in the same way Dan means.
If by some miracle Henry Cavill actually did get cast as James Bond, and have as good a debut as Casino Royale was for Craig, the transition to a new Bond could be as smooth as silk. But I honestly hope they drop the idea of having an actor's entire run be part of some ongoing arc, especially if they are going to retroactively try to tie-in events that from the prior films and novels were not related in any way. It's for reasons like that that Casino Royale and Skyfall have probably been rewatched infinitely more times than the other Craig Bond films.
Henry Cavill can't Act. He already failed as a Spy in the movie The Man From U.N.C.L.E.
Good Bye, Mr. Bond !
Great video. There are some reviews out there saying this movie changed the character, that is woke. They dont. Its the same Bond of Casino Royale. This Bond always have been like this. The character has an arc in these movies and this one doesnt betray that road. Maybe the end will create some debate ( iam still dont know if i agree with it) but iam sure that this movie is way better than Brosnan last movie or any last Bond movie from any other actor. By far.
I've been a big Bond fan for 30 years and I absolutely loved No Time To Die. I'll have to see it again to properly know where I'd rank it, but it could be at the very top of the list. There are several amazing action scenes, Bond's mission has big stakes, and Bond's personal story was fantastic. I think that last point is why I'll now say that Daniel Craig is my favourite Bond. I've liked all the actors, but whereas I've enjoyed the others as spies or action heroes, Craig's Bond is the first that really made me care about him as a person. The main point where I'll disagree with Dan's NTTD review is about the length. I hate when movie critics do this, it seems like any time a film is more than 2 hours they always say "its too long". I was never bored and I never looked at my watch.
I watched all of Craig's Bond movies over 2 weeks before going to see No Time To Die. Really great series, Quantum of Solace is definately the weak point, for me its because of the shaky camera and fast editing in the action scenes, I can't tell what is happening. First time I saw Spectre I was underwhelmed, not terrible but not great. However, I do think that No Time To Die makes Spectre better because of the storylines and character development that continued. Its almost like a 2 part story, now the story is complete, part 1 makes more sense.
Thanks for this Dan i was wathing for it
Man, he caught feelings and tried to wife it up in like every movie in the Craig era. In Casino Royale, his chick just died.
I absolutely loved this movie, I’m so glad it’s so good because Daniel Craig deserved a good send off. He made me love James Bond, I also think that all Craig’s Bond movies will be appreciated even more with time. Telling a complex story over the span of 15 years will pay off in decades to come.
I wasn't sure, because it happened so fast, but I thought I saw a cameo that may have hinted at who the new Bond is going to be, or at least a wink to those who have been clamoring for it.
The stuffed bunny?
I was feeling similar in regards to Batman, but the Robert Pattison trailer dropped and now I'm all-in in that vision
If a director sincerely wants to show us something we haven't seen before I trust that
i loved the fact this Bond had not just one but two powerful kick ass women. Lashana and Ana had some great action scenes.
I agree with a lot of the overall sentiment of this review, except for in regards to the length. I didn't think this film felt as long as it is at all, in contrast with Spectre where I very much felt the length. I thought this movie was very well paced and never dragged. Also, I'd say Spectre is the weakest of the bunch as I think Quantum of Solace has overlooked value within the series, but in any case, I've really enjoyed Craig's tenure.
Daniel Craig is the Christian Bale of the Bond Franchise. His Bond films are The Dark Knight Trilogy of the franchise. Craig made Bond, dark, gritty and a believable character again. He brought the franchise back to it's roots. Just like Christian Bale and Christopher Nolan did with the Batman character. Casino Royale is the Bond version of Batman Begins. It gave fresh new life to the Bond Franchise, and brought it back from the goofiness and the over the top galore of Die Another Day. Just like Batman Begins did it after the backlash with Batman & Robin. Craig made the Bond films, dark, believable and realistic again. Also you could say that No Time to Die is the Bond version of The Dark Knight Rises. As Bond sacrifices himself to save the world just like Batman did it in The Dark Knight Rises. Both the Bond and Batman films have had a similar evolution in tone and depiction. By initially starting off as dark and gritty, then becoming camp and over the top. Then becoming dark, grounded, realistic and serious in tone again.
I hope the rumors aren't true where they change James Bond into a woman.
Whens the what if...? review coming out?
*spoiler alert*
There were some really weird beats in the third act with the villain. We don't even know who those "buyers" were, hence the urgency felt artificial. The villain just let the little girl leave without any motive, nor did he even look for the girl's mom, a point that caused the negotiation to break down. He was just "going somewhere", but somehow ended up being all alone to fight with Bond, and his motive and dialogue to support his vision were really hard to justify.
Great review can tell you're a big Bond fan
Superb review.