I've driven 50,000 kms in the CX9 Azami AWD. No major issues. Drives like a beauty. Driven it light off-road and majority on-road in rural and city areas. I'm averaging about 9.8 L per 100 kms. Not bad for a 2.5 L turbopetrol that has 170 kw of power that can get you from 0 to 100 kph in 7 secs (pretty impressive for a 2 tonne vehicle) and 420 nm of torque to pull you up a hill or overtake (comparable to a diesel engine). Great vehicle if you just need a comfortable people mover. Only issue, as pointed out, is the 10,000 kms service intervals.
I have CX-9 Azami LE 2019 ver. This car is so nice but then one thing that's unfortunate is that wireless car play doesn't have. Definitely, there is a Bluetooth function but it is different from iPhone carplay.
Just bought a 2020 The center console is to big and has a ridge that is very uncomfortable to rest my leg against Like everything else but the massive torque steer
Very pretty flagship trim, clean lines and nice choice of colors mixed in. I'm just not sure it's in the same class as the Pallisade however (which makes true the earlier statement that the CX 9 beats the Pallisade for price). The dash options including the screen however is pretty sadly dated from 2016/18.
We were cross shopping this between the palaside. This cx-9 is beautiful inside and outside. Better material therefore more luxurious. We didnt like how 2nd row takes forever to fold for 3 rd row access and that awful space saver. The 7 seater Palaside equivalent is does not look as beautiful BUT it is spacious with smaller car footprint, offers more tech, very easy 3rd row access via middle 2nd row seat deleted, diesel engine plenty of oomph when fully loaded and full size spare wheel perfect for rural driving. Palaside front grille is subjective but its growing on me.
Pretty useless info , no engine specs , no suspension travel or firmness judgement, no body roll, type of leather on seats? , infotainment features and details?, no critiques etc. Sounded like a 5 year old reading off the internet from mazdas website. Useless review
![Eminem - Temporary (feat. Skylar Grey) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZaK9Wi5ho0o/mqdefault.jpg)
I've driven 50,000 kms in the CX9 Azami AWD. No major issues. Drives like a beauty. Driven it light off-road and majority on-road in rural and city areas. I'm averaging about 9.8 L per 100 kms. Not bad for a 2.5 L turbopetrol that has 170 kw of power that can get you from 0 to 100 kph in 7 secs (pretty impressive for a 2 tonne vehicle) and 420 nm of torque to pull you up a hill or overtake (comparable to a diesel engine). Great vehicle if you just need a comfortable people mover. Only issue, as pointed out, is the 10,000 kms service intervals.
Great video. Really well presented by the presenter
Great, straightforward and fun review as usual! Loved the description of the feel of the interior etc. too. 👍
where did you shoot this video at? Loved the nice greenery and river.
Aussies get captain chairs cooled? Here in the US, we don't get that at all.
I have CX-9 Azami LE 2019 ver.
This car is so nice but then one thing that's unfortunate is that wireless car play doesn't have. Definitely, there is a Bluetooth function but it is different from iPhone carplay.
why does a family of 3, need an 8 seater?
Nice car & excellent review
Just bought a 2020
The center console is to big and has a ridge that is very uncomfortable to rest my leg against
Like everything else but the massive torque steer
Surely for this price the multimedia could have been a touch screen and slightly bigger.
Very pretty flagship trim, clean lines and nice choice of colors mixed in. I'm just not sure it's in the same class as the Pallisade however (which makes true the earlier statement that the CX 9 beats the Pallisade for price). The dash options including the screen however is pretty sadly dated from 2016/18.
Hello..this car or palisade u reviewed recently??? Thanks
We were cross shopping this between the palaside. This cx-9 is beautiful inside and outside. Better material therefore more luxurious. We didnt like how 2nd row takes forever to fold for 3 rd row access and that awful space saver. The 7 seater Palaside equivalent is does not look as beautiful BUT it is spacious with smaller car footprint, offers more tech, very easy 3rd row access via middle 2nd row seat deleted, diesel engine plenty of oomph when fully loaded and full size spare wheel perfect for rural driving. Palaside front grille is subjective but its growing on me.
@@HDeemand thank u so much
I love my car ♥️♥️♥️
Great car
❤❤❤
so mazda went to the library to glance at some 10 year old car magazines to design something for 2022. what are they thinking?
This model came out in 2016 and will be replaced with the cx-90 for 2023 models.
412 Hoeger Mountains
The seats look like a dead Storm Trooper.
❤️🔥
For the money this car is too dull. The Hyundai Palisade is far more modern. The lack of a touch screen is also a pain.
Disagree but hey, that could be subjective. The fact a 6 year old car is still selling and selling well is testament to Mazda design and engineering
Paliside is best choice ।।
Up until 2020 it was a touchscreen, so puzzled why Mazda went backwards here?!
Pretty useless info , no engine specs , no suspension travel or firmness judgement, no body roll, type of leather on seats? , infotainment features and details?, no critiques etc. Sounded like a 5 year old reading off the internet from mazdas website. Useless review
Emory Village
What a lot of rubbish… look at curves, stitches, space for cups.. For God sake, tell us technical characteristics.., safety features, cameras etc