THINKING, FAST AND SLOW by Daniel Kahneman | Core Message

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 фев 2019
  • 1-Page PDF Summary: bit.ly/3Oc9tAR
    Book Link: amzn.to/2WFbBae
    FREE Audiobook Trial: amzn.to/2ypaVsP
    Animated core message from Daniel Kahneman's book 'Thinking, Fast and Slow.'
    To get every 1-Page PDF Book Summary for this channel: gum.co/cmOOM
    This video is a Lozeron Academy LLC production - www.ProductivityGame.com
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 414

  • @someothername9462
    @someothername9462 4 года назад +28

    Before an important decision -Slow down, and scan your "faulty thinking" checklist. That's an excellent summary of an exceptional book!

  • @robertogerardi7040
    @robertogerardi7040 3 года назад +36

    Thanks!
    Timestamps:
    System I: fast thinking, reactionary. System II: slow thinking, deeper level of analysis.
    1. Frequent Exposure - The more we see something, the more we trust it. - Our preferences will be based upon our environmental conditions - Is this the best option, or the option that I've been frequently exposed to? - 1:52
    2. Status Quo Bias - i. Loss aversion (losses loom longer than gains) & ii. Endowment effect (Emotional attachment) - Ask yourself: what opportunities (opportunity cost) am I losing by maintaining the status quo?- 3:32
    3. Tunnel Vision - System I tends to use limited information (and block all conflicting information) to draw conclusions / quick judgments - (W-Y-S-I-A-T-I) What You See Is All There Is! System I Infers and invents causes and intentions, THEN neglects ambiguity and suppresses doubt- "Why might the opposite be true?" That will allow you to challenge old assumptions, and to avoid underestimating - 6:00
    Be aware of biases to avoid costly mistakes.

  • @KimberlyLetsGo
    @KimberlyLetsGo 5 лет назад +18

    The Endowment Effect is what happens when I go to garage sales. Sometimes people will price their stuff too high because they have an emotional attachment to the items. I go into the sales with no emotional attachment and offer less for an item. If they have too much emotional value in it, they won't sell it for less and take a sure sale.
    Very valuable info here! Thanks for your hard work!!

  • @loquatmuncher
    @loquatmuncher 4 года назад +8

    what a brilliant youtube channel idea. Its like video spark notes. Love it

  • @davidfong7848
    @davidfong7848 5 лет назад +6

    Great summary! I've been listening to the audiobook on and off for a long time because unlike some other books this one really dives deep into the nuances of cognitive bias so I recommend reading the book because there are so many layers to it. It really forced me to challenge my deep rooted belief that humans have an intuitive wisdom beneath all the fear, emotion, and bias but I'm no longer sure it's that simple after reading this.

  • @DamonLeeKeizer
    @DamonLeeKeizer 5 лет назад +3

    Definitely adding this book to my list of must reads! Thank you for the video 🙏🏻

  • @JamesYeang
    @JamesYeang 4 года назад +1

    Wow. I felt this was probably the most actionable youtube video I've watched all week. Thank you for summing this up.

  • @BIngeilski
    @BIngeilski 4 года назад +3

    Thank you very much for your contribution! All the best to you!

  • @csarg36
    @csarg36 4 года назад +2

    Great summary. I love this channel and the books you recommend

  • @golozaur1
    @golozaur1 4 года назад +2

    Great concise and useful review of the book!
    Great work, lots of value added!
    Thank you

  • @dronesandnature
    @dronesandnature 5 лет назад +1

    Frequent exposure bias - true. A good one to evaluate and challenge before making a decision. Thank you for this summary.

  • @shineh1000
    @shineh1000 3 года назад

    Thanks for the summary. I am currently listening to this book and you’re summary helps to filter down the main points. Video is awesome too !

  • @medcareukraine
    @medcareukraine 3 года назад +1

    Thanks for the summary. It helps to filter down the key points. Video is awesome too!

  • @zahraghanbarpour6217
    @zahraghanbarpour6217 Год назад

    I am not a native English but I started to read this book even somehow it is hard to me to understand it but the information that this book has and gives you is incredible and I realized that we did not educated about the way of thinking , this book will help you to be more smart and be more wise so I highly recommend it you

  • @henkgaudiummagnum1513
    @henkgaudiummagnum1513 5 лет назад +41

    Great summary! I recently discovered your channel and am enjoy listening to your summaries while I'm cooking. Have you ever considered putting your recordings online as podcasts as well?

    • @vijendrasharma2904
      @vijendrasharma2904 4 года назад

      Plz tell some of the good podcasts u listen to ....

    • @abdallaomar4673
      @abdallaomar4673 3 года назад +2

      @@vijendrasharma2904 school of greatness, tim Ferris , tony robbins , Tom bilyeu

  • @ShahzadAli-dh5ue
    @ShahzadAli-dh5ue 4 года назад +50

    outstanding videos. Unmatched review of some of the most important books ever written. Thanks, for your precious work.

    • @ibnfulan5716
      @ibnfulan5716 Год назад

      The bests summary page out there easily for me! Fast to the point and easy to understand are the two things that does it for me keep going!

  • @AyratHungryStudent
    @AyratHungryStudent 4 года назад +2

    My friend suggested this book to me a few years ago. I have it in my to read list but never got to actually read it.
    Thanks for the video!

  • @heloisaheng3189
    @heloisaheng3189 2 года назад

    I really like the way you present the summary and putting in some sense of humour.

  • @user-hb1es5rm2g
    @user-hb1es5rm2g 7 месяцев назад

    Thank you for this video.

  • @qazqazqazqazgxdhdvds
    @qazqazqazqazgxdhdvds 4 года назад +3

    Thank u very much for sharing this book... I should buy it

  • @ecurb10
    @ecurb10 4 года назад +2

    Great book, and thanks for trying to present it's main points simply.
    One criticism though: Kahneman is not simply "the author" - he's a Nobel Prize-winning research psychologist and economist. Might be worth mentioning that....very important.

  • @luciali4513
    @luciali4513 2 года назад

    Wow! You did amazing job to explain this difficult book, thank you for this brilliant video.

  • @belligerentbeagle
    @belligerentbeagle 4 года назад +3

    This is such an underrated channel

  • @lydiabelhabib7865
    @lydiabelhabib7865 5 лет назад +1

    Thank you for your work 😊

  • @sagarwedshimani1349
    @sagarwedshimani1349 4 года назад +19

    Firstly, I would like to congratulate you and thank you for the great video. I bought this book a month or two ago, and it was a hell of a pain to read it. Although I like to read scientific facts behind every event, like what we think and why we do so, this book goes deep into science that it becomes hard to continue after a while. You provided a great summary and explanation because I know how hard it would be to summarise this rather scientific explanation book.

    • @emys3324
      @emys3324 2 года назад +1

      I thought it only me
      Thank you

    • @sinisterm385
      @sinisterm385 2 года назад

      Is it hard to read?

    • @SamSam-rz1ko
      @SamSam-rz1ko 2 года назад +1

      @@sinisterm385 honestly it's interesting topic but it's just too boring off a read, this summary was excellent.

    • @TheirSavior
      @TheirSavior Год назад

      Well said. I finished the book, but it was a challenge. I reccomend this video over the book itself.

  • @roopalivs6782
    @roopalivs6782 2 года назад

    Great channel n brilliant summary of a heavy book like that ✔️💯✌🏾👍🏾👍🏾.
    U have taken efforts to simplify and give the gist of it with the right examples.
    Thank you n all the best for your future endeavours ✌🏾 ✋🏽 👍🏾

  • @luciesupstairs
    @luciesupstairs Год назад

    wonderful. thank you. can't help but see how this is relevant in a time when we're bombarded with other people's narratives and interpretation of "news"!

  • @priyankashetty565
    @priyankashetty565 5 лет назад +2

    Summary on the one minute manager please! I am loving your videos....

  • @shesostyles3432
    @shesostyles3432 4 года назад

    Will be thinking fast & slow from now on!

  • @martynwinn3028
    @martynwinn3028 4 года назад +26

    For anyone still unsure about the ‘bat & ball’ question....
    The total cost of both bat and ball have to add up to $1.10. So if the ball costs $0.10, then the bat has to cost $1.00. The DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE TWO NUMBERS IS $0.90.
    So to readdress the original question.... if they both have combined cost of $1.10, but the bat costs $1 more than the ball, how much does the ball cost?.... well, $0.05. That would leave $1.05 left over for the bat.
    The difference between $0.05 and $1.05 is $1.

    • @Huki777
      @Huki777 3 года назад +1

      Finally someone mentioned it.

    • @user-vr9dj4eo8v
      @user-vr9dj4eo8v 3 года назад +2

      You can use this simple equation:
      x for ball
      x + 1 for bat
      1.1 = (x +1) + x
      1.1 = 2x + 1
      2x = 1.1 - 1
      2x = 0.1
      x = 0.05

  • @BlueOrangey1
    @BlueOrangey1 4 года назад +38

    4:24 hold up buddy, my fast thinking can confidently say I would not have the chance to take that bet 10 000 times lmfao

    • @CaptainWumbo
      @CaptainWumbo 4 года назад +1

      My fast thinking would be telling me it's a con. If something is too good to be true it's because it is. It's a common tactic to sucker people in with a good deal only to take advantage of their trust later with a really bad deal they're less likely to see coming. Then the villain gets to think you deserved it because you took a deal that was one sided, how immoral!
      Let the galaxy brains think they are perfectly rational and immune to slippery slope and other brain hiccups. Sometimes you lose more than money when you think you understand something you don't, or you trust someone you shouldn't have.

  • @Israel-wv2gl
    @Israel-wv2gl 2 года назад +1

    This video is brilliant, thanks, I just subscribed

  • @Chandasouk
    @Chandasouk 5 лет назад +3

    A classic that is in my backlog

  • @ramoneandrade5551
    @ramoneandrade5551 4 года назад +202

    When you use your “slow reasoning System” and you still get it wrong because you don’t know math

    • @jay-rathod-01
      @jay-rathod-01 4 года назад +4

      (1+0.05)+0.05=1.10

    • @anorcia3130
      @anorcia3130 4 года назад +1

      @Pat 1.00+b= bat+ball

    • @abz4852
      @abz4852 4 года назад +1

      @Pat its correct but why stress moving b to the right at the beginning, the expansion of brackets times 1 automatically remove it.
      So
      (1.00+b) + b = 1.10
      1.00 + 2b = 1.10
      b = 0.1÷2 = 0.05
      Oh also its 0.05 not 0.5
      Anyways its good im just being extremely fussy

    • @wahyuindrasto8307
      @wahyuindrasto8307 4 года назад +6

      *Why would a person use their slow reasoning system over a measly ten cents? Even if they get it wrong, it's not like losing much. If we're talking about $100, then it makes sense to slow down a bit and let's think this through.*

    • @BrainFoodCafe
      @BrainFoodCafe 3 года назад +3

      1+1 =2

  • @hongha721
    @hongha721 3 года назад

    It is really helpful, thank for your efforts

  • @tigerclaw7876
    @tigerclaw7876 2 года назад

    I got this book on Google play book for year almost free thanks to Google offer,
    I didn't knew it was this mind boggling. I will read it this week

  • @aishwaryakochar3334
    @aishwaryakochar3334 4 года назад +1

    Never read the book but seeing your video , how may I know which is the best choice even after slow thinking . Slow thinking leads to overthinking & sometimes just like a pendulum, you come back to your original choice ! #Life

  • @vijendrasharma2904
    @vijendrasharma2904 4 года назад

    Even followers of this community are so lit... Many of us give real life examples of the theory explained... Its very valuable to read comments also...

  • @hoogabooga290
    @hoogabooga290 4 года назад +129

    "if we don't do our research before an election, we'll trust the candidate who's name we've heard or seen the most"
    Story of the 2020 democratic primary.

    • @JohnnyArtPavlou
      @JohnnyArtPavlou 4 года назад

      Hooga Booga, is that the story? Isn’t it more complex than that?

    • @hoogabooga290
      @hoogabooga290 4 года назад +7

      @@JohnnyArtPavlou No actually, Biden will win because of his name recognition. Not because of his policies

    • @JohnnyArtPavlou
      @JohnnyArtPavlou 4 года назад

      What I mean is, there are a number of factors in having him be one of the last 2 Democratic candidates in the race. Factors that made other candidates less attractive to voters. Warren too progressive, most others too inexperienced. The order in which the primaries took place, etc.

    • @RootinrPootine
      @RootinrPootine 4 года назад +8

      JohnnyArt Pavlou Oops, it looks like you’re thinking fast again. Nope, it’s name recognition. Heres the slow thinking version:
      1) Biden was Vice President.
      2) Leftist policy/Bernie gets zero support on tv
      3) Old people watch more tv news
      4) news cries wolf about trump and russiagate
      5) old people panic, understandably.
      6) news tells them centrists have a better chance of beating republicans despite 2016 definitively shattering this decades long lie.
      7) old people vote turn out is more than young people (who don’t watch propaganda) and this swings the nomination.
      8) Biden wins on name recognition and voter suppression (centrist that they know and rich people are fine with and the media drums this home).
      9) Biden loses to Trump because he’s even more vulnerable than Hillary. Repeat of 2016.
      See how thinking fast and slow works? You learn something new every day. :)

    • @mrpicky1868
      @mrpicky1868 3 года назад +1

      unlike trump that runs on platform of well thought out policies? lol

  • @waseemm6935
    @waseemm6935 3 года назад +3

    1:55 frequent exposure
    3:34 status quo
    5:59 Tunnel vision

  • @anithamsangi4797
    @anithamsangi4797 5 лет назад

    Absolutely great summary.

  • @We_Must_Resist
    @We_Must_Resist 11 месяцев назад

    I could not finish the book. Thanks for the summary, which makes a lot of sense.

  • @raymondtuckler2105
    @raymondtuckler2105 3 года назад

    Very interesting. I see that the media uses these tactics to a science. I'm going to implement some of these ideas on my marketing and sales approach. Thank you!

  • @thekevmeister77
    @thekevmeister77 4 года назад +4

    Concisely stated! Well done.

  • @RonaldForti
    @RonaldForti 5 лет назад

    Very well put. Thanks

  • @MrMSS22
    @MrMSS22 4 года назад +12

    To give some additional insight in the "tunnelvision"-example: As mentioned multiple times in the book, humans are very bad at applying statistics. In the given example, one tends to conclude a probability from a representativeness. The given character traits are very typical of a librarian. The amount of farmers with these traits relative to all farmers is lower than the amount of librarians with these traits relative to all librarians. Therefore, the likelihood of having these traits, given that you are a librarian (farmer), is very high (very low). However, the question we ask is: "what's the likelihood of being either a librarian or a farmer, given the character traits". In this case, we assume that the ABSOLUTE number of nerdy farmers is still higher than the absolute number of nerdy librarians. For example, 5/10 (50%) librarians and 10/200 (5%) farmers are nerdy, then among the nerds, there is still a higher percentage of famers (10/15=66.7%) than of librarians (5/15=33.3%). From what is said in the video, one could conclude that the fact that there are 20x more farmers than librarians is sufficient to conclude that the guy is a farmer. Let's reduce the percentage of nerdy farmers to 2%. Now only 4/200 farmers are nerds. The likelihood of being farmer given you are a nerd is now only 4/9 compared to 5/9 librarians among the nerds. This is why you have to be careful, if the character trait is even more specific and if the base rates (the probability of belonging to a certain group, i.e. being a farmer/librarian in general) are not as different as in this case.

  • @xiaolu7988
    @xiaolu7988 4 года назад +11

    The Tunnel Vision also applies to a common notion that you don't need the education to be successful.

  • @lansay15
    @lansay15 4 года назад

    Merci beaucoup Nathan!

  • @aroyals339
    @aroyals339 4 года назад

    Great book, read it a few years back. I need to read it again. (prob a few times)

  • @AdrianaGirdler
    @AdrianaGirdler 5 лет назад +2

    This is so interesting! It's funny how many different ways we can think and process the same problem. Thanks for sharing. Cheers!

  • @MuhammadIshaque
    @MuhammadIshaque 3 года назад +10

    Read the book twice, but was unable to get the core concept, you made it oversimplified. Thank you

    • @chrissykora4604
      @chrissykora4604 3 года назад

      This book is like eating a thick porridge with peanut butter. It's sooo dense and slow.

  • @Brian-rs4ug
    @Brian-rs4ug 4 года назад +4

    Our core beliefs about life have been programmed into us from a very early age. (Whether good or not so good)
    Our lives will be run by these beliefs “unchecked” if we do not make a conscious decision to sort thru them. And pick and choose which beliefs need to be rewired and changed. Our brains are made of plastic and can be remolded and reformed with new habits, attitudes and core values.

  • @rhlogic
    @rhlogic 4 года назад +3

    I read the book also, excellent summary! Saved in my favorites!

    • @bhaskars1987
      @bhaskars1987 4 года назад

      Has the book helped you to make better decisions now?

    • @rhlogic
      @rhlogic 4 года назад +1

      Bhaskar Jyoti Nath I believe so, things like “what you see is all there is” and the distinction between system 1 and system 2 are now in my subconscious mind.

    • @jelw3197
      @jelw3197 4 года назад

      Robert Hernandez is it repetitive?

    • @bhaskars1987
      @bhaskars1987 4 года назад

      @@rhlogic what's system 1 & system 2?

    • @rhlogic
      @rhlogic 4 года назад

      @@jelw3197 Somewhat, but I think that is good to solidify the concepts. I am not far beyond average brain capacity.

  • @TheAman013
    @TheAman013 4 года назад

    Why didn't I find your channel before? Thanks for such awesome videos :)

  • @ggpz1979
    @ggpz1979 5 лет назад

    May god bless you...🙏🙏

  • @admiralhyperspace0015
    @admiralhyperspace0015 4 года назад +2

    One thing I want to point out is thinking fast in everyday matters isn't bad. You should ONLY jump to a conclusion by thinking fast when the decision you are making is of significant importance. Because doing that with everything in your life will be mind costly and probably cause "paralysis by analysis". "You get a 90% okay deal. Buy it" (simple)

  • @baskarramalingam599
    @baskarramalingam599 4 года назад +5

    Concise summary.
    I have read this book and it is very deep. We need to spend considerble time to complete this book.
    This summary is really helpful for people who cannot read this book fully.
    Thanks .

  • @virtuallyrealistic
    @virtuallyrealistic 4 года назад +9

    I read the book several times a couple of years ago. You should read it too. Parts of it are scary! It is not difficult to deceive any of us or all of us if you had good understanding of these conative flaws and were conscious free person.

  • @jairusan
    @jairusan 4 года назад

    Hello Productivity Game, excellent summary, great content, and very very true. I was wondering if you have any plans to summarize the 48 laws of power, I know this is a long one but it will be great to even get a summary of the most important chapters and laws or even one summary per law? Thank you so much for all the great work!

  • @Paintmylips
    @Paintmylips 2 года назад

    Thank you so much

  • @persikii8020
    @persikii8020 4 года назад +9

    I’ve just recently bought this book. I hope I don’t regret.

    • @destinyovbiebo8988
      @destinyovbiebo8988 4 года назад +2

      Persik II let me know if it’s good or not, please. I’m trying to buy it.

    • @rengeng4022
      @rengeng4022 4 года назад +2

      You should really try it, it's really a must read

    • @persikii8020
      @persikii8020 4 года назад

      destiny ovbiebo it will take time before I read it because I’m still reading three books.

    • @destinyovbiebo8988
      @destinyovbiebo8988 4 года назад +1

      Persik II ok, still let me know, anyway.

  • @EddieStyle
    @EddieStyle 5 лет назад

    Excellent!

  • @highsol222
    @highsol222 2 года назад

    I'm going to start reading this book soon. My stock mentor did always tell me "trust but verify."

  • @pavankumar039
    @pavankumar039 4 года назад

    Great explanation

  • @Ayella_256
    @Ayella_256 4 года назад

    Brilliant...

  • @dieseljagwar6673
    @dieseljagwar6673 3 года назад +2

    I don’t think this man knows just how truly valuable this channel really is!

  • @_b93_14
    @_b93_14 2 года назад

    Thank you❤

  • @johnwellington269
    @johnwellington269 4 года назад

    Great work

  • @globaleducation2079
    @globaleducation2079 5 лет назад

    Nice video and good explaination...

  • @ShawnShoyunus
    @ShawnShoyunus 5 лет назад

    Awesome!!!

  • @BrandonSL500
    @BrandonSL500 Год назад +1

    4:10 regarding the coin toss bet for losing 100 or gaining 150. You mentioned that most people would turn down the bet even though that if they bet 10,000 times they are virtually guaranteed to make money. However, the key part to the bet is not going broke before the odds turn in your favor. If you go broke in 5 or 10 turns then it does not matter what the overall odds are over 10k or even 1000 turns.

  • @user43643
    @user43643 4 года назад +1

    My life have meaning now!!!!

  • @theotherway1639
    @theotherway1639 7 месяцев назад

    This was helpful! I got this book on amz with the mindfulness meditation workbook called "30 Days to Reduce Anxiety" by Harper Daniels. It's critical to learn to detach from societal expectations of going faster and set boundaries to take control of one's time and life.

  • @TYHan-rc3zl
    @TYHan-rc3zl 4 года назад

    What a Great video

  • @MrSly025
    @MrSly025 5 лет назад +2

    Very underrated channel

  • @mikejrog
    @mikejrog 6 месяцев назад

    Just snagged this book on Amazon (paperback)... excited for it to come in. Admittedly, that very first example in this video took me way longer than it should have to actually understand 🤣

  • @harishankar11
    @harishankar11 5 лет назад

    Thank you

  • @OnsideHaddock72
    @OnsideHaddock72 4 года назад

    My brain went straight to the second thing, or maybe it did the first one so fast that i couldn't notice, or maybe i was just paying super attention during the questions asking? So many variable

  • @cutdepiefails6596
    @cutdepiefails6596 5 лет назад +138

    Damn I took a WHILE on the ball - bat question.

    • @spizongema2715
      @spizongema2715 4 года назад +20

      I still don't understand it

    • @Amos-dm3ie
      @Amos-dm3ie 4 года назад +9

      It was indeed a bat question

    • @KarlGutowski
      @KarlGutowski 4 года назад +55

      Terrible question worded awkwardly by shitty math teachers who try to turn math problems into IQ tests instead of conveying clear meaning and focusing on abstraction. But mathematically, it should be set up like this: $1.10 = ($1 + x) + x, where x is the cost of the ball. So, the ball cost $0.05 and the bat $1.05

    • @Alastairmellon
      @Alastairmellon 4 года назад +9

      @@KarlGutowski yes what a shitty explanation he gave

    • @mistiemill3262
      @mistiemill3262 4 года назад +12

      @@KarlGutowski thank you, I felt so slow because I was thinking "if you had a bat that's $1.00 and ball that's $0.10, then it equals $1.10....."

  • @ArturoCabello
    @ArturoCabello 5 лет назад +4

    *Thank you for the great suggestion! :)*

  • @rorezez
    @rorezez 5 дней назад

    Faulty Fast Thinking Bias #1: Frequent Exposure Bias
    Concept: Kahneman explains that frequent repetition can make falsehoods easier to believe because familiarity is not easily distinguished from truth.
    Example: In a study at the University of Michigan, students were more likely to associate Turkish-sounding words advertised frequently with positive attributes.
    Strategy to Overcome: To combat this bias, it is crucial to question preferences that may be influenced by frequent exposure without critical assessment of the actual quality of the options.
    Timestamp: 1:52 - 2:52
    Faulty Fast Thinking Bias #2: Status Quo Bias
    Concept: This bias relates to the reluctance to change existing conditions. Kahneman highlights two main aspects: loss aversion and the endowment effect.
    Example: Kahneman illustrates the endowment effect with a coffee mug experiment, where mug owners priced their mugs higher than those who did not own the mugs.
    Strategy to Overcome: Utilize loss aversion against itself by considering the opportunities that may be lost by maintaining the status quo.
    Timestamp: 3:33 - 5:42
    Faulty Fast Thinking Bias #3: Tunnel Vision Bias
    Concept: This is the tendency to draw conclusions from limited information while ignoring conflicting data.
    Example: The riddle about Steve, a shy and orderly person, who is more likely perceived to be a librarian than a farmer, despite there being statistically more farmers.
    Strategy to Overcome: Pose questions like "Why might the opposite be true?" to challenge assumptions and broaden perspectives.
    Timestamp: 5:57 - 8:00

  • @hartmanrp
    @hartmanrp 5 лет назад

    I have been following your RUclips channel and really enjoy your book summaries. It made me interested in learning how you make your videos. I purchased Doodly because it looked like it might be close, but it doesn't seem to have the capabilities to support your productions. What do you use?

  • @ParitimeSchool
    @ParitimeSchool 5 лет назад

    💮💮💮
    Magnificent one...

  • @MotiveVideoBook
    @MotiveVideoBook 5 лет назад +1

    Awesome whiteboard animation video-.

  • @inthedms82
    @inthedms82 5 лет назад +269

    That’s why Socrates hated democracy just anybody can vote without prior knowledge

    • @JamboRiffs
      @JamboRiffs 4 года назад +2

      The main strength of democracy is the ability to sack the government when they are going down the wrong path, corrupt or incompetent. Unfortunately it is rather a blunt tool, because bad decisions get through, but like others said, so far its the best we got.

    • @lambynighttrain
      @lambynighttrain 4 года назад +7

      @@JamboRiffs Democracy is immoral and the best we have is no government at all. The belief in “authority,” which includes all belief in “government,” is irrational and self-contradictory; it is contrary to civilization and morality and constitutes the most dangerous, destructive superstition that has ever existed. Rather than being a force for order and justice, the belief in “authority” is the arch-enemy of humanity.

    • @BitmapJack
      @BitmapJack 4 года назад +2

      What sucks is authoritarian morons behind donald tromp like steve bannon crew trying to use this knowledge to bypass peoples minds using marketing

    • @zissler1
      @zissler1 4 года назад +1

      Bitmap Jack Steve Nanno doesn’t work with trump anymore, and do pray tell how it’s authoritarian? It’s the dems that are scary, they have media behind them, and people use talk show hosts as reliable news sources that are 24/7 orange man bad. There’s no accountability with them. If trump does something bad at least you’ll hear about it, heck even if he does something good they’ll report it as bad.

    • @jongunkim6297
      @jongunkim6297 4 года назад

      China communist party claimed they found a better system, Chinese style socialism

  • @Maor791
    @Maor791 3 года назад

    Incredibly relevant for today’s situation with the vaccines!

  • @jasonfletcher9115
    @jasonfletcher9115 4 года назад

    Good stuff.

  • @theosteknion6219
    @theosteknion6219 2 года назад +1

    Shout out to Stefan Mischook for introducing me to Dr. Kahneman & mentioning his book "Thinking Fast & Slow".
    And thank you Productivity Game for breaking it down in layman's terms.

  • @alxleiva
    @alxleiva 3 года назад +4

    Your videos are pure gold! who needs blinkist anyway?
    I'm sure it takes so much time and effort to produce these but let me point 2 aspects that might encourage you to continue:
    -Imagine the impact you are creating and millions of people's life by creating these videos
    -The amount of knowledge you've accumulated for your personal growth is immense
    So in the name of all the people who watch your videos I wanna say THANK YOU!

    • @stanleyklein524
      @stanleyklein524 9 месяцев назад

      "needs blinkist anyway?" Answer = No one. and no one needs this crap either.

  • @dheerajkumar5642
    @dheerajkumar5642 3 года назад

    Key takeaways
    FaST
    1.frequent exposure to repetition make it hard for people to judge someone immediately and they believe it to be good bcoz they heard or seen it so many times.
    In recent political Scenario most of the people in the country do not have proper information on whom to vote they vote on intuition so frequent exposure to a candidate despite him/her being a bad leader people tend to vote for the same leader again as they don't want to go into nut and bolt of the whole process.
    2.frequent exposure to status quo.
    If we react to what we just understood without going through the slow analytical approach we tend to be wrong many times even if we are wrong we don't want to accept it and rather maintain our status quo igoring many biases subconsciously.
    3.Narrow thinking is a tunnel approach you don't have to turn around or take cut it is a straight one dimensional road , Means that we don't give another thought about the possible scenarios of the same situation and believe in that our fast thinking reached at first , It should be multidimensional approach but we tend to follow a single dimensional approach to a given problem.

  • @agentsmith7866
    @agentsmith7866 4 года назад +2

    I couldn't finish the book. Exactly as I thought. You control your mind don't let it or anyone else control it. Pretty much same thing as meditation. Gives you better judgment and decision making.

  • @ubiqonline8045
    @ubiqonline8045 2 года назад

    Good attempt at simplifying a complex book on a complex topic. I've read the book myself, and consider it one of the most important books I've read in my 60 years. The video gives a wrong slant to the book by seeming to imply that the slow, rational system is superior to the fast, instinctive system. It is not. Kahneman makes it clear with his superb experiments why we need to pay attention to BOTH systems. We are not ever in real life given the chance to bet on 10,000 coin tosses (the video neglected to mention that it was not a one-off coin toss); however we are faced with many situations where we need to make snap decisions. The fast system excels at this and saves us. The book is a wonderful read, anybody who wants to understand human behaviour must read it.

  • @combacrouge1
    @combacrouge1 4 года назад

    I really needed this video 1 year ago before I bought my current house. Ar.

  • @jayshukla450
    @jayshukla450 5 лет назад

    Too good

  • @justinasbei
    @justinasbei 4 года назад

    I'm thinking of buying.

  • @mdkaiserali5087
    @mdkaiserali5087 3 года назад

    awesome

  • @natedaug1
    @natedaug1 2 года назад

    Good video.

  • @Nancylistens
    @Nancylistens 4 года назад

    Thanks

  • @cgspirit17
    @cgspirit17 4 года назад

    Thanks for the video, I had the book but didn't finish it, its difficult to read!

  • @timnelson8656
    @timnelson8656 3 года назад

    0:16 the worth of an item is not necessarily related to the cost at all. So the cost could be $5 bat and $4 ball