No, just some people like hating like BMW fans, I'm a Mercedes fan and the EQ line-up is ugly I don't like it but when there is a beautiful car it doesn't matter from wich brand you should give credit to it no matter what fan car you are @CarswithMiles
@@adilou9633 Most of the hate I've seen for new Mercedes cars is for two specific reasons: 1. The move to hybrid powertrains with smaller ice engines combined with a battery pack and electric motors. In particular this is mainly a complaint with the new C 63, because the car no longer sounds as good and it also increases the weight, and potentially complexity of future repairs. But as you can see, even this GT is heavier than the old generation despite not turning into a hybrid yet. The increased weight means the car is less exciting to drive on a track or "fun" roads. And same with the sound, the issue is that it's less exciting to drive because the new sound from the smaller engine isn't as exciting. 2. The loss of physical buttons on the interior with everything switching to ipad in the center of the car. Many people prefer the feeling of pressing a physical button, and there's also the whole "don't fix what isn't broken" philosophy. You don't have to agree with their reasons, because these are subjective preferences of course, but it's not "for no reason"
@timeslowingdown hybrid is forced to do it because of the new regulations of the European Union, I agree with you about the c63, in terms of the interior I see a lot of RUclipsrs don't complain about Tesla using all things in a screen, all say it's good and minimalist but with Mercedes they complain
@@adilou9633 Probably because Tesla has always done that and it's mostly return customers complaining who would have stayed away from Tesla in the first place? Not sure... I actually do like the newest MB lineup myself btw, but I can understand the reason why some people don't
Not a hater and not even trying to cringe you, but your statement about the old gen not being that good(looks) in your opinion, made the whole argument about this new design worthless
I'll take a Porsche 911 Turbo or a Aston Vantage instead, they both feel more special. On a side note i am thinking of getting a used Jaguar F Type with the V8 engine - pretty excited, it seems to be really good value on the used market 😮. I am also thinking of getting a X350 Jaguar XJR - you don't see cars like that anymore
Apparently there were a few people that complained about the previous GT's hardcore nature and lack of practicality . So AMG brought this one to please those customers . I also think this is far from being a 911 competitor due to the fact that it's too heavy . I would personally choose the older version , but i also understand why this exists .
Some dealers are willing to sell their AMG GT 55 for $15,000 under MSRP. With a well spec'd 55 being around 150-160k you should be able to buy one for 135-145k. Paying 200k for the 63 is a hard NO.
Tbh I don’t see AMG ending they’re just rebranding a bit. They never really had a Supercar imo. Always saw the amg gt as a sports car since it’s a grand touring but they have a hypercar, so we know they’re capable of a Supercar.
@ 9:54 The AMG 63 GT also has a 850 hp hybrid version that would definitely not smoke 💨💨💨that thing 😂 the extra 💰your paying for is the luxury /interior and feel (experience/ sound💯
I think it looks good, a happy median between a 911 and the other German cars, understated, but not boring. Good, honest review. Also, most places have a Merc dealership, Porsche, AM, etc, can be hundreds of miles away. It is what it is. The GT-55 is a better deal though, unless you want bragging rights, or really want the extra .7 +/-
Mercedes-Benz currently doesn't sell a single sports car, let that sink in. I love the new AMG GT 55 and am considering buying one. That said, if the AMG GT 55 was RWD without rear-axle steering they would have made a more engaging driver's car.
You don’t swipe the door handle. You just press ouch the indented square part on it. On approach with the key fob the handle will automatically pop out. Again, if you swipe it won’t open until you touch the indented square. This car is a beast.
Not one person I know who has the first gen AMG wants to switch to this. It’s too Heavy. Weighs as much as a Panamera. Nobody wants that massive screen. We want buttons. We all wanted a more raw car. Don’t get me wrong. It’s a great car, but not many people will buy it. It’s an SL in coupe form. Thats all it is. Too expensive. Many better options in that price range. Even if it was already at depreciation prices, I wouldn’t trade my GTS for it.
Personal taste but the previous gen is an absolute beast. Did you drive the GTR? This is the thing about modern day wanna be car journalists, you lot don’t even own these cars but go get them for a day and make videos. Your main purpose is to make money off RUclips. Majority of you never owned a true sports car. How can you review a car like this and go seat at the back and say “you cannot got a human back there” as if the car was made to haul humans. You lot compare Porsche and amg cars and fail to understand that both companies have different philosophies. If all cars where the same like how electric cars are then what would be the fun and enthusiasm in driving them. You really think Porsche can’t straight pipe their cars for better sound? You lot have to really think before you come in here. These contents are just made for kids to watch and salivate over cars. Not everyone needs pops and bangs. My GTS cayman is stock and standing next to it, sounds amazing and I feel same about my 63s. To each its own but remember manufacturers are out for a profit and some have cut corners and some have tried to stay true to their philosophy until times change.
A lot of scattered points here. But understand that I would make these videos for free (and a lot of the time I do). It's simply something I enjoy doing. And I drive every car I Review for as long as humanly possible before putting together my thoughts. I've put nearly 600 miles on the GT in the week I've had it. And I feel like that's enough time to put together a comprehensive review. I made a lot of 911 Turbo comparisons here because that's simply AMGs target rival with this GT. And if you go on websites like Car and Driver, they say the exact same thing. My main purpose in creating content is to put together a story that makes sense. And do so in a way that I enjoy and that hopefully others enjoy too. And if every car journalist had to own every car they reviewed in order for it to have validity; then this medium simply wouldn't exist.
Mate I understand every journalist can’t own every car. The bottom line is every car is curated for a purpose and it brings variety. Your and others who do these videos make it as if a negative aspect on the manufacturer if the exhaust doesn’t sound the way you want. Also, driving it for 600 miles is never the same as having the car for a year at least. Living with the car. That being said, I like your eloquence and by the way, this is coming from a chap who actually owns the cars you review (not all but yes). We drive these cars for the visceral experience and I’ll criticize Merc for looking like Tesla interiors these days but hey, they want the glamor and glitz. If you are in Maryland sometime, hola and we will burn some rubber in a GTR, amg.
@@cheechchong3021 calm down you are an adult I hope. A critique isn’t about negativity. You can take it or leave it. I own these cars as an enthusiast. I don’t know about you. For the record I don’t peruse RUclips looking to criticize channels. It’s a public domain, remember that.
Whenever auto maker try to share chassis with different models I feel like buyers are getting ripped off cause that makes it cheaper for them to produce.
Usually, that wouldn't be much of a problem It's okay to try to minimize production costs, because when the company makes more profit on a product they're encouraged to stick with that product line, but where it becomes a problem is when they're replacing an exceptional proven platform with another platform that compromises the essence of the car, It's just not right.
AMG have gone backwards, the outgoing GT series was one of the first cars to actually take it to Porsche and the 911 and even win in some cases, with the new GT they've gone backwards. All I can hope is they're going to expand the GT Line up, with the GT63 Coupe + 2 being more like the Turbo S and they release a RWD, lighter shorter GT like the old. I feel the GT63 is massively underpowered (Yes 585hp is a lot) but the old GTC had 550 and is actually quicker than the new GT. It should've been the GT55 having 585hp and the GT63 having 635hp, maybe a later date a GT63s with 650hp - Very very underwhelming generation.
It’s obnoxious imo. I have driven one at an AMG event. It’s absolutely huge. I have a 911S 992.1. It’s absolutely a much better car. Probably best to compare it to the turbo. If we are going to be even more accurate in comparison we should really compare this to the Porsche GT3/RS. That truly is a proper comparison. Porsche is the benchmark sports/super car.
Many people don't realize that while all these new cars like BMW and Mercedes are heavier, and they don't feel heavy when driving. Is true because these cars use stronger chassis and advanced technology to mask their weight, making them seem even better than lighter, older models. However, the weight still affects the tires and brakes. Some might argue that newer brake and tire technology solves this issue, but imagine if we put the same advanced brakes and tires on lighter cars-they would perform even better. Additionally, the extra weight on the brakes and tires causes them to wear out and overheat much faster compared to lighter cars. These modern cars can mask their weight to drivers who don't push them to their limits, creating an illusion of superior performance compared to lighter cars. But this is actually a false impression.
I don't like how the numbers on the name don't coincide with the engine size. Infiniti has been doing the same thing. If it's called a g63, it should have a 6.3L engine. Of course that kind of size isn't needed anymore so just give it the same name as the last gen
Pirce is laughable, you can get a 2020 GT63s and a used GT s for that price and just drive either one depending on your mood. Or better yet get that C8 Z06...
Design is nice af but as someone else said, would take a vantage over this. Just pulled the trigger on a f pace svr recently and tbh id take even that over this. The lack of buttons on the inside is the WORST. Even having a static screen for climate on the gv70 was horrible, so much more difficult to press a button on a screen while driivng vs a hard tactile button.
@@CarswithMiles I feel like its not always about strictly performance, I mean look at this thing, the interior looks better than anything else imo, hand built engine, you compare it to a 911, what am I gonna do take it to a track everyday? Its probably better suited as a daily compared to the 911. The 911 for sure doesn't sound like this. the sounds, the emotional experience seems better. This looks better than a 911 in my humble opinion. Performance wise yes! 911 is probably faster, but I dont give a damn. this is a work of art.
Also not to forget with all the strict EU regulations and EVs becoming the new thing (unfortunately). I’m sure Mercedes is getting slapped in the hand harder than other brands so maybe the edge may not be there like previous models. We got to take that into consideration as well! Amgs are known for their lound V8s, this is their identity. But because of these strict regulations, they’ve been forced to make changes and want to get ahead of the curve with batteries and other forms of high power technology. I hope you as a “car enthusiast” can understand that…
I think the presenter wasn’t being honest in some respects with his comparisons. He compared a this to the Eray, which is a hybrid . Of course it’s going to be faster than this version. Also, the corvette from a build and tech perspective should not be compared to a AMG.
lol, so 1 second slower makes a car suck? Say to yourself “one thousand one”. Did you do it? That’s the same time the e ray beat the 63. Also, the e ray is a hybrid with 2.6 . Of course it’s faster
@@brentparker9527 absolutely when spending this much on a car, that is 4wd and does have enough hp, you should be able to expect better. There is no reason that you wouldnt unless you are in love with its looks, then you might as well shop around. These cars are big investments and you should be able to expect better performance from a coupe merc. It is not a sedan. They simply made it too heavy. There is no reason you should have to compromise on performance within this price bracket. This is a garbage attempt in this price bracket.
You're right that for the average person, AWD is somewhat safer. However, I don't think the new AMG GT is meant for enthusiasts. It's mainly for the American and East Asian markets and in Germany for... two certain demographics.
You are supposed to tap the door handle to pop out (not brush it). And tap in anywhere but on the small rectangle. Then it opens, like always.... RUclipsrs please spend more time with the product you are reviewing... And cut the TopGear crap on marketing cars by saying that their most beautiful angle is the ugliest... In this instance, the tail lights... No, they are killer beautiful.
Carbon, those headlights belong on an EV, he’s a smaller channel and he’s still ultimately being himself man. No need to be so provocative. Stop hating on another man’s success and market your own channel better. Hating on a channel bc his editing is superior than yours is not a good look.
Labeling what is success does not hide the fact that a RUclipsr does not how to open a door of a Mercedes. How would all design people and engineers at Mercedes feel when their product is under defamation. In general, videos "I spent 2 hours or 1 day" with a car should not contain final recommendations or high criticism... Otherwise I'm a fan of Miles and that's why I watch the channel. I hope that my high criticism helps him be more careful in the 2hours or 1 day with the car type of videos.
There are already test mules of an RWD GT63, which people assume will be the GTS or GTR or whatever. The advantages of a shared platform is they can mess around with details to alter. I don't think its necessarily bad for the base model to have more breadth in capability so as to appeal to more people, which is I think what the intent was for this one - making it more viable for more people. How many variants of the 911 are there? Don't see why AMG can't take the same approach with this one.
You should be reviewing Hondas and Kias.Maybe Subaru.Giving you this car to review was a huge mistake by Mercedes.You are not qualified to comment on 200k$ cars.”Credit to Mercedes”….and then describe what a piece of shit it is.Moronic.
To me SL is one of the most beautiful cars ever and apparently lighter eventho convertible! So why would you get a GT. True GT should be a light car like 1600 kg imo. I personally liked how in 2016 Mercedes came close to Porsche dynamic wise with the old GT and GT had a better design interior and exterior. At this time SL is better option than GT.
![NOSFERATU - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters December 25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nulvWqYUM8k/mqdefault.jpg)
I'd take the Aston Martin Vantage over this. Same engine. Has physical buttons, and in my opinion looks better
Agreed. Very similar in price
I agree 100%
correct
In real life this looks better
BS dude!
I wont lie this thing is beautiful but they need to get that weight under control
The weight is not my biggest issue with it. But 4300 pounds is a lot.
@@CarswithMilesthat one you reviewed is 4400 lbs, the hybrid is the one that estimated on AMG’s word is about 4800 lbs
Looks better than the 911. The 911 is beautiful but a little on the boring side with respect to looks
This has definitely gotten me more looks than any 911
@@CarswithMiles …great video Miles, enjoy your content!!!
It's also slower than a 2018 BMW M8. That just pisses me off.
The design for sure is a win. I wish their EVs follow more this line
I wish EVs would sink back into being more niche
EV??? EWWWWWWWWWWWWWwwwwwwwwwwwww
Dope video idea: 2019 AMG GTC vs 2019 Aston Vantage. Both are the same money ($80k) and probably more fun to drive than this car
If I can get my hands on them I'd definitely do it
2:17 did he say pause..
Never thought I'd hear "pause" in a car review... This is getting out of hand. 😂
The GT63 is beautiful. Idc what critics say
Its the brand new C63S with 4Matic....coupe
Honestly that's not a bad way to look at it haha
Kinda an awful take. It’s more of a s63 coupe to me
@@fifteen8850 Nah, that car was way longer and way nicer in the inside.
@@AbdussalamMisbahudeenthat car is also a grand tourer, like this amg
I prefer the more pronounced front mid engine layout of the Previous gen..2seater
green hell AMG GTR with yellow brakes and seat belts..❤
this car is so beautiful
This one looks gorgeous, but some people hate all-new Mercedes cars, for no reason , they just like hating
I think everyone has a reason that could be viewed as valid in their own eyes
No, just some people like hating like BMW fans, I'm a Mercedes fan and the EQ line-up is ugly I don't like it but when there is a beautiful car it doesn't matter from wich brand you should give credit to it no matter what fan car you are @CarswithMiles
@@adilou9633 Most of the hate I've seen for new Mercedes cars is for two specific reasons:
1. The move to hybrid powertrains with smaller ice engines combined with a battery pack and electric motors. In particular this is mainly a complaint with the new C 63, because the car no longer sounds as good and it also increases the weight, and potentially complexity of future repairs. But as you can see, even this GT is heavier than the old generation despite not turning into a hybrid yet. The increased weight means the car is less exciting to drive on a track or "fun" roads. And same with the sound, the issue is that it's less exciting to drive because the new sound from the smaller engine isn't as exciting.
2. The loss of physical buttons on the interior with everything switching to ipad in the center of the car. Many people prefer the feeling of pressing a physical button, and there's also the whole "don't fix what isn't broken" philosophy.
You don't have to agree with their reasons, because these are subjective preferences of course, but it's not "for no reason"
@timeslowingdown hybrid is forced to do it because of the new regulations of the European Union, I agree with you about the c63, in terms of the interior I see a lot of RUclipsrs don't complain about Tesla using all things in a screen, all say it's good and minimalist but with Mercedes they complain
@@adilou9633 Probably because Tesla has always done that and it's mostly return customers complaining who would have stayed away from Tesla in the first place? Not sure... I actually do like the newest MB lineup myself btw, but I can understand the reason why some people don't
I can afford that car. Now where did I put that Monopoly board-money? 😁
At least it doesn’t look like a modern BMW
the more I watch this channel the more I enjoy it. You seem like a true car guy instead of some biased reviewers
2:43 perfectly placed “pause” 🤝🏽
Not a hater and not even trying to cringe you, but your statement about the old gen not being that good(looks) in your opinion, made the whole argument about this new design worthless
The 911 didn't start the single tail light bar.
I'll take a Porsche 911 Turbo or a Aston Vantage instead, they both feel more special. On a side note i am thinking of getting a used Jaguar F Type with the V8 engine - pretty excited, it seems to be really good value on the used market 😮.
I am also thinking of getting a X350 Jaguar XJR - you don't see cars like that anymore
The Jags are fantastic
Apparently there were a few people that complained about the previous GT's hardcore nature and lack of practicality . So AMG brought this one to please those customers . I also think this is far from being a 911 competitor due to the fact that it's too heavy . I would personally choose the older version , but i also understand why this exists .
911 hasn’t got anything interior wise compare to this if you honest. This car is the fastest around the circuit go and find out !!!
You just did the same time(0-60) as the S63 E Performance in your previous video
how much weight separates both?
GT is 1200 pounds lighter
'Slidability' is a perfect teem.
They did not need to add back seats 💺
Some dealers are willing to sell their AMG GT 55 for $15,000 under MSRP. With a well spec'd 55 being around 150-160k you should be able to buy one for 135-145k. Paying 200k for the 63 is a hard NO.
Tbh I don’t see AMG ending they’re just rebranding a bit. They never really had a Supercar imo. Always saw the amg gt as a sports car since it’s a grand touring but they have a hypercar, so we know they’re capable of a Supercar.
All you guys just hate on merc 🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️simple.
@ 9:54 The AMG 63 GT also has a 850 hp hybrid version that would definitely not smoke 💨💨💨that thing 😂 the extra 💰your paying for is the luxury /interior and feel (experience/ sound💯
I think it looks good, a happy median between a 911 and the other German cars, understated, but not boring. Good, honest review. Also, most places have a Merc dealership, Porsche, AM, etc, can be hundreds of miles away. It is what it is. The GT-55 is a better deal though, unless you want bragging rights, or really want the extra .7 +/-
Mercedes-Benz currently doesn't sell a single sports car, let that sink in. I love the new AMG GT 55 and am considering buying one. That said, if the AMG GT 55 was RWD without rear-axle steering they would have made a more engaging driver's car.
I will say the steering wheel controls are great, after the learning curve. I’ve but about 3K miles in my SL55 and really like the MBUX system.
Beautiful piece of machinery and very practical indeed - yet, I’d still have a 911 each and every day. Great review Miles!
Can’t agree with that, especially with the 911’s lack of sound
All great points. Anyone who chooses this over a 911 turbo or turbo s is insane
So the Amg gt platform is dead now? Wouldn't that be a waste or it's so old to a point that they stop using it?
I think Mercedes found it simpler to merge platforms for two different product lines (GT and SL)
Amg do you want a car thats almost 3 times more expensive that has a shittier interior and less tech here is the new amg gt
Everything u hate about the look is what’s absolutely awesome about it the freaking car smh.
You don’t swipe the door handle. You just press ouch the indented square part on it. On approach with the key fob the handle will automatically pop out. Again, if you swipe it won’t open until you touch the indented square. This car is a beast.
Its slow tbh
Not one person I know who has the first gen AMG wants to switch to this. It’s too Heavy. Weighs as much as a Panamera. Nobody wants that massive screen. We want buttons. We all wanted a more raw car. Don’t get me wrong. It’s a great car, but not many people will buy it. It’s an SL in coupe form. Thats all it is. Too expensive. Many better options in that price range. Even if it was already at depreciation prices, I wouldn’t trade my GTS for it.
Neither will I
With as much as you speak about these cars, I would love to get your opinion on the Audi RS7 performance.
The front of this car is shaped like a bean. The S63 looks so much better.
Did Miles just say “the old man in me” 😂😂😂😂😂 man quit
The taillights remind me of the roma
I can see where the comparison comes from
Too long! Pause! Thats crazy! 😂
Great video keep up the good work
Personal taste but the previous gen is an absolute beast. Did you drive the GTR?
This is the thing about modern day wanna be car journalists, you lot don’t even own these cars but go get them for a day and make videos. Your main purpose is to make money off RUclips. Majority of you never owned a true sports car.
How can you review a car like this and go seat at the back and say “you cannot got a human back there” as if the car was made to haul humans.
You lot compare Porsche and amg cars and fail to understand that both companies have different philosophies. If all cars where the same like how electric cars are then what would be the fun and enthusiasm in driving them. You really think Porsche can’t straight pipe their cars for better sound? You lot have to really think before you come in here. These contents are just made for kids to watch and salivate over cars.
Not everyone needs pops and bangs. My GTS cayman is stock and standing next to it, sounds amazing and I feel same about my 63s. To each its own but remember manufacturers are out for a profit and some have cut corners and some have tried to stay true to their philosophy until times change.
A lot of scattered points here. But understand that I would make these videos for free (and a lot of the time I do). It's simply something I enjoy doing. And I drive every car I Review for as long as humanly possible before putting together my thoughts. I've put nearly 600 miles on the GT in the week I've had it. And I feel like that's enough time to put together a comprehensive review.
I made a lot of 911 Turbo comparisons here because that's simply AMGs target rival with this GT. And if you go on websites like Car and Driver, they say the exact same thing.
My main purpose in creating content is to put together a story that makes sense. And do so in a way that I enjoy and that hopefully others enjoy too. And if every car journalist had to own every car they reviewed in order for it to have validity; then this medium simply wouldn't exist.
Mate I understand every journalist can’t own every car. The bottom line is every car is curated for a purpose and it brings variety. Your and others who do these videos make it as if a negative aspect on the manufacturer if the exhaust doesn’t sound the way you want. Also, driving it for 600 miles is never the same as having the car for a year at least. Living with the car. That being said, I like your eloquence and by the way, this is coming from a chap who actually owns the cars you review (not all but yes). We drive these cars for the visceral experience and I’ll criticize Merc for looking like Tesla interiors these days but hey, they want the glamor and glitz. If you are in Maryland sometime, hola and we will burn some rubber in a GTR, amg.
@@bn8530 how about not getting on someone's channel and criticizing them so harshly for no reason - wow so negative - sickening to read your post
@@cheechchong3021 calm down you are an adult I hope. A critique isn’t about negativity. You can take it or leave it. I own these cars as an enthusiast. I don’t know about you. For the record I don’t peruse RUclips looking to criticize channels. It’s a public domain, remember that.
@@bn8530 it's a public domain right? so take my opinion of you or leave it. you were a bully
Whenever auto maker try to share chassis with different models I feel like buyers are getting ripped off cause that makes it cheaper for them to produce.
Definitely a cost saving benefit for AMG
Usually, that wouldn't be much of a problem It's okay to try to minimize production costs, because when the company makes more profit on a product they're encouraged to stick with that product line, but where it becomes a problem is when they're replacing an exceptional proven platform with another platform that compromises the essence of the car, It's just not right.
Yea, I can’t imagine Porsche sharing platforms.
AMG have gone backwards, the outgoing GT series was one of the first cars to actually take it to Porsche and the 911 and even win in some cases, with the new GT they've gone backwards. All I can hope is they're going to expand the GT Line up, with the GT63 Coupe + 2 being more like the Turbo S and they release a RWD, lighter shorter GT like the old. I feel the GT63 is massively underpowered (Yes 585hp is a lot) but the old GTC had 550 and is actually quicker than the new GT. It should've been the GT55 having 585hp and the GT63 having 635hp, maybe a later date a GT63s with 650hp - Very very underwhelming generation.
It’s obnoxious imo. I have driven one at an AMG event. It’s absolutely huge.
I have a 911S 992.1. It’s absolutely a much better car. Probably best to compare it to the turbo. If we are going to be even more accurate in comparison we should really compare this to the Porsche GT3/RS. That truly is a proper comparison.
Porsche is the benchmark sports/super car.
Many people don't realize that while all these new cars like BMW and Mercedes are heavier, and they don't feel heavy when driving. Is true because these cars use stronger chassis and advanced technology to mask their weight, making them seem even better than lighter, older models. However, the weight still affects the tires and brakes. Some might argue that newer brake and tire technology solves this issue, but imagine if we put the same advanced brakes and tires on lighter cars-they would perform even better. Additionally, the extra weight on the brakes and tires causes them to wear out and overheat much faster compared to lighter cars.
These modern cars can mask their weight to drivers who don't push them to their limits, creating an illusion of superior performance compared to lighter cars. But this is actually a false impression.
I don't like how the numbers on the name don't coincide with the engine size. Infiniti has been doing the same thing. If it's called a g63, it should have a 6.3L engine. Of course that kind of size isn't needed anymore so just give it the same name as the last gen
Pirce is laughable, you can get a 2020 GT63s and a used GT s for that price and just drive either one depending on your mood. Or better yet get that C8 Z06...
Design is nice af but as someone else said, would take a vantage over this. Just pulled the trigger on a f pace svr recently and tbh id take even that over this. The lack of buttons on the inside is the WORST. Even having a static screen for climate on the gv70 was horrible, so much more difficult to press a button on a screen while driivng vs a hard tactile button.
Very beautiful, to my eye. Way too heavy! That's the main reason the 911 Turbo crushes it in most measures.
Better than many
The corvette lines are pitiful compared to this IMO. You can’t but a Turbo S for anywhere near MSRP😂
The previous GT looked better imho, this looks too Porsche that went to Burger King too many times.
Another hater
You didn't like the previous generation?? SMH
Mercedes have lost their mojo long time ago, dido for bmw.
this guy is wack, how dare you title something like this as "ruined"
Because I drove it
@@CarswithMiles I feel like its not always about strictly performance, I mean look at this thing, the interior looks better than anything else imo, hand built engine, you compare it to a 911, what am I gonna do take it to a track everyday? Its probably better suited as a daily compared to the 911. The 911 for sure doesn't sound like this. the sounds, the emotional experience seems better. This looks better than a 911 in my humble opinion. Performance wise yes! 911 is probably faster, but I dont give a damn. this is a work of art.
Also not to forget with all the strict EU regulations and EVs becoming the new thing (unfortunately). I’m sure Mercedes is getting slapped in the hand harder than other brands so maybe the edge may not be there like previous models. We got to take that into consideration as well! Amgs are known for their lound V8s, this is their identity. But because of these strict regulations, they’ve been forced to make changes and want to get ahead of the curve with batteries and other forms of high power technology. I hope you as a “car enthusiast” can understand that…
The door handle works all the time. You just have to gently rub that’s all. Not as fast as you were doing it.
You can’t rush perfection bro.
Perfection might be a stretch
I read the thumbnail ‘ruined’ like Stewie 😂
Man just say you dont like Mercedes lol
I love Mercs!
@CarswithMiles I know. I just wanted your pleasant response. Keep doing your great reviews and having your positive feedback.
I prefer the guy rating the car ngl. 😝
To each their own
@@CarswithMiles 😭 lmao,
I think the presenter wasn’t being honest in some respects with his comparisons. He compared a this to the Eray, which is a hybrid . Of course it’s going to be faster than this version. Also, the corvette from a build and tech perspective should not be compared to a AMG.
his point was the E Ray - being thousands less is much faster..that's it
@@cheechchong3021 I understood his point. However he’s comparing apples to oranges. Comparing a hybrid to an ICE isn’t a fair comparison
No pun intended but why not call this channel
MILES PER HOUR
😂
Unless that name is taken already ????
send me a cheque if you do change it.
Already taken😅, he's a good friend
@@CarswithMiles well try
MILES TO KPH 😂
🤷🏾♂️
Kinda looks like a Z4
this ran an 11.2 quarter on road conditions I saw the e ray do a 10.4. This merc sucks.
lol, so 1 second slower makes a car suck? Say to yourself “one thousand one”. Did you do it? That’s the same time the e ray beat the 63. Also, the e ray is a hybrid with 2.6 . Of course it’s faster
@@brentparker9527 absolutely when spending this much on a car, that is 4wd and does have enough hp, you should be able to expect better. There is no reason that you wouldnt unless you are in love with its looks, then you might as well shop around. These cars are big investments and you should be able to expect better performance from a coupe merc. It is not a sedan. They simply made it too heavy. There is no reason you should have to compromise on performance within this price bracket. This is a garbage attempt in this price bracket.
The car industry is evolving, and maybe us car enthusiasts will need to do the same. I like to hypothesise that AWD is making our streets safer.
Tesla's are in thousands of accidents every year. I think it all comes down to driver attentiveness and skill level.
You're right that for the average person, AWD is somewhat safer. However, I don't think the new AMG GT is meant for enthusiasts. It's mainly for the American and East Asian markets and in Germany for... two certain demographics.
@@unripetoast-nu4lvwut
You are supposed to tap the door handle to pop out (not brush it). And tap in anywhere but on the small rectangle. Then it opens, like always.... RUclipsrs please spend more time with the product you are reviewing... And cut the TopGear crap on marketing cars by saying that their most beautiful angle is the ugliest... In this instance, the tail lights... No, they are killer beautiful.
My take on the taillights is called... An opinion. And cannot be deemed as incorrect
Carbon, those headlights belong on an EV, he’s a smaller channel and he’s still ultimately being himself man.
No need to be so provocative. Stop hating on another man’s success and market your own channel better. Hating on a channel bc his editing is superior than yours is not a good look.
Labeling what is success does not hide the fact that a RUclipsr does not how to open a door of a Mercedes. How would all design people and engineers at Mercedes feel when their product is under defamation. In general, videos "I spent 2 hours or 1 day" with a car should not contain final recommendations or high criticism... Otherwise I'm a fan of Miles and that's why I watch the channel. I hope that my high criticism helps him be more careful in the 2hours or 1 day with the car type of videos.
There are already test mules of an RWD GT63, which people assume will be the GTS or GTR or whatever.
The advantages of a shared platform is they can mess around with details to alter. I don't think its necessarily bad for the base model to have more breadth in capability so as to appeal to more people, which is I think what the intent was for this one - making it more viable for more people.
How many variants of the 911 are there? Don't see why AMG can't take the same approach with this one.
Hopefully we do get that RWD 63!
You should be reviewing Hondas and Kias.Maybe Subaru.Giving you this car to review was a huge mistake by Mercedes.You are not qualified to comment on 200k$ cars.”Credit to Mercedes”….and then describe what a piece of shit it is.Moronic.
Are you upset by criticism?
The weight, the copy & pasted interior & no dedicated RWD option is disappointing
It’s beautiful to look at though
Totally agree
10/10
I don't get the difference between this and the SL
This has a hard top not convertible... lolol
@@timeslowingdown there are plenty of cars that have a convertible version and aren't treated as different models. That can't be the only difference.
To me SL is one of the most beautiful cars ever and apparently lighter eventho convertible! So why would you get a GT. True GT should be a light car like 1600 kg imo. I personally liked how in 2016 Mercedes came close to Porsche dynamic wise with the old GT and GT had a better design interior and exterior. At this time SL is better option than GT.
@@PresidentJackBauer my comment was a bit of a joke, I would also hope there are more differences than that
Its slow tbh. It dont really compares to 911 turbo with 580 hp 992. This Mercedes is too slow to be comparable. M4 CS is better car
It’s so refreshing to see a young black man doing something productive. Well done son
Maybe you should keep your thoughts in your head…..
It ugly
I dig the design
A porsche 911 if mercedes made one