Very well photographed. The grain and contrast suit the mood and the ambience you and the model created. On a different note, I used to be unhappy at hearing profanity on the Y.T channels. I guess living in the UK had something to do with it, but the behaviour of people over here has changed dramatically in the last few years for the worse, so I have remind myself not to curse and use the F word constantly. A task that I have miserably failed at.
Thank you for the watch and comment! I was very pleased with the way these photos came out (though I'm still assessing my final opinion on P3200). Yeah, profanity is one of my weaknesses. I find I curse a lot more than I think or intend to. I'm also trying to curse less, but sometimes you get caught up in the moment.
@@michaelmarshallphotography5515 Printed on 8x10 you can definitely see it. But fine enough to see leafs in a tree and little small details. But street name plates in the background are not readable. Also the image is high in contrast. Hope that paints a pictures.
I've found shooting this film between 800-1000 ISO and then developing it at 3200 is magic! Give it a try, Kodaks most flexible film, I'd shoot it more if it wasn't so expensive lol
Thank you for the suggestion! I have 3 rolls in my film fridge, so I'll be sure to give this a try! What does pushing the developing do to the images? That's a +2 Stop in developing. I'd imagine it makes it more contrasty and grainy? I'll definitely try it out!
@@michaelmarshallphotography5515 it helps control the crushed blacks and grain control in my experience. Dan Milnor made a video about doing this, so I can't take credit lol.
Very well photographed. The grain and contrast suit the mood and the ambience you and the model created. On a different note, I used to be unhappy at hearing profanity on the Y.T channels. I guess living in the UK had something to do with it, but the behaviour of people over here has changed dramatically in the last few years for the worse, so I have remind myself not to curse and use the F word constantly. A task that I have miserably failed at.
Thank you for the watch and comment! I was very pleased with the way these photos came out (though I'm still assessing my final opinion on P3200).
Yeah, profanity is one of my weaknesses. I find I curse a lot more than I think or intend to. I'm also trying to curse less, but sometimes you get caught up in the moment.
I finally tried the new p3200 @1600 during the day. Developed it in adox xt-3 (xtol equivalent) and I’m absolutely loving it.
Interesting. I'll have to give that a try. What is the graininess like?
@@michaelmarshallphotography5515 Printed on 8x10 you can definitely see it. But fine enough to see leafs in a tree and little small details. But street name plates in the background are not readable.
Also the image is high in contrast. Hope that paints a pictures.
Why though? HP5@1600 would do the same job and be quite cheaper.
M4 and model classic, enjoyed
Thank you for the watch! Glad you enjoyed.
I've found shooting this film between 800-1000 ISO and then developing it at 3200 is magic! Give it a try, Kodaks most flexible film, I'd shoot it more if it wasn't so expensive lol
Thank you for the suggestion! I have 3 rolls in my film fridge, so I'll be sure to give this a try! What does pushing the developing do to the images? That's a +2 Stop in developing. I'd imagine it makes it more contrasty and grainy?
I'll definitely try it out!
@@michaelmarshallphotography5515 it helps control the crushed blacks and grain control in my experience. Dan Milnor made a video about doing this, so I can't take credit lol.
I'll give it a try. I am really enjoying experimenting. As you said, it's such a flexible stock!
Second!
24th! Wait... I think I counted wrong.
First
If I respond….does that count as second? Deep thoughts here. 🤔