No way, I can't believe that someone took the time out of their day to translate something into this language! I estimate that the noun you were describing is the video itself based on the counters saying that the noun is opaque black and white, 2D and non-physical There are some errors in the text, but that doesn't even matter, I can't believe that you actually translated something
@@ParallelOlelogram I'd love to know what I got wrong! I know for one I assumed this youtube video is Lego Bionicle set number 8947 Radiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces, as I am pretty sure it is not a rock. I've been trying to translate something to the effect of "Nice video!" into the cursed conlang circus submissions I come across, it hasn't always been successful. I settled here for "This video [verb]s!" as I couldn't think of a way to express "good". I thought maybe something intangible but orangish yellow, with 7 spatial and 7 temporal dimensions, but wasn't sure that would come across very well (and I'd be bending the rules by going above 2 temporal dimensions). Does your reply here mean i/my youtube profile picture is good? if so, 1: thank you very much! and 2: That means "ФЯF-ФЯ" _can_ be used to mean good, which I considered for a while before landing on the regular verb, and now I wish I'd kept it. Overall this was a really fun language to translate things in and out of, the most fun I've had so far actually! Although the orthography was definitely annoying at times (which is good overall, cause, cursed).
@@JuniperHatesTwitterlikeHandles Yes, you mistook the video for Radiak, skipping that counter would have worked. Another error was using 255 instead of 100 for max opacity on the opacity counters, since those are based on percentage. The other error was saying 2 time dimensions, since the video and everything that we know of only has one time dimension (moving forward or backward in time). Two time dimensions would be the equivalent of moving sideways in time which we aren't able to comprehend. The error was mistaking direction for dimension, since every dimension has two main directions (example: height is a dimension, and its two main directions are up and down) I meant the closest thing that I could get to saying "thank you" was saying that you are good. I chose to describe your profile picture since that's the only reference I have of you. But it is a nice profile picture too! And I wasn't originally intending to have ФЯF-ФЯ also mean good, but decided why not, it would be easier And by the way, I probably should have mentioned this in the video, but going over two time dimensions wouldn't break the rules. Counters for amounts of colours and dimensions can go as high as you want. Oh, I completely agree with the orthography. I made the thing and even I hate writing it Anyway, I'm glad you enjoyed my language!
in my language, we don’t say something is “not a rock”, we say it’s “part of Lego Bionicle set number 8947 Radiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces”, and i think that’s beautiful
@@ParallelOlelogramBut how do you tell the difference between two different Lego Bionicle set number 8947 Radiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces’s?
It's not hex-based, quaternion-directional, and the number system also isn't based on transcendent constants like e and \pi. It doesn't have BCH representation of negative numbers and BCH Float representation of all numbers. So all things considered, it's a language that just has exited being "blessed", but light years and ijk-rotations away from "cursed".
@@kiboma4209 Base 10 (decimal) is not inherently bad, but: - color values are based on a 24-bit RBG colorspace, but that method of defining colors is based on computers being binary and divides into pieces more evenly if written in hexadecimal (base 16) or another power of 2. - color opacity is defined by percentage in base 10, so the relationship between a color values and opacity values is kind of arbitrary. The less-cursed option would have been to either define color by percentage, or define opacity based on hexadecimal 100 (which is decimal 256), so all the values would be on the same scale.
Additional thought: a red/green/blue colorspace is kind of arbitrary and human-centric, so there's no good way to describe objects that are colors beyond human perception and understanding, which seems like it would be a problem for speakers of this language in particular.
The delivery of “…afterwords you put a string of numbers corresponding to the RGB value of the color you are trying to communicate” made me lose my shit idk why I think it’s because the rest of the video up until that point was relatively tame
I'm so glad this got recommended to me, now I can finally decipher what my sleep paralysis demon has been trying to tell me all this time! (Fr though, this is amazing, I love it so much)
@@ParallelOlelogram It can’t be unsaid now! Well maybe one needs to make a language where it can. Like you say “I’ve”, then you say “(’ve)⁻¹ I⁻¹” and listeners are conditioned to forget that you have ever started with “I’ve”.
when i saw the preview, i thought it was a language based on ascii encoding errors, ones when you have gibberish instead of actual text. was not prepared to see a language with the most specific nouns and most unspecific everything else
"Interdimensional Horrors Beyond Human Comprehension" Guess this is how the rest of the world percieves my language as well as other languages that use cyrillic😅
The language is definitely cursed, but especially with the industrial revolution part, it fit's perfectly into my D&D World (I'll just make up some fafefoo sounds and tell the players that the cosmic horror just told them to find Lego Bionicle set number 8947 Radiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces)
@@fast1nakus That one is probably Win1251 → Win1252! Like ãîñóäàðûíÿ ìîÿ êîñòðîìà. For mostly e… IDK probably in longer texts it’ll be that way because of frequencies.
I love how the larger portion of your text read is describing all of the characters you need to include in the sentence. I guess when you're making a language about Interdimensional Horrors, you need to describe them really clearly!
To fix the problem of nouns having the same number you could just raise the primes to each counter. 2^255 * 3^255 * 5^0 * 7^255 and so on This will provide a different number for each noun with different properties, and the listener would only have to do a prime factorization on the fly while listening to understand.
Isn't the whole point of the sum that the nouns will get shorter and more practical after their first introduction? In that case, have fun reading out all those decimal places. 7^255 alone has over 200 of them, and that is just one of your factors. (You could make the numbers more manageable by removing the already unused precision of the RGB system and using a scale from 0 to 1, of course.) As much as this makes it more cursed, it would probably render pronouncing the full spoken sample infeasible, thus turning the language into a theoretical construct rather than an eligible submission for the CCC.
@@Nikola_M Well, if the spoken sample takes over 12h, you can no longer upload it to RUclips as a single video, so I'm pretty sure that's where the cutoff would be for how inefficient a CCC (not the system of measurement!) entry could be.
Is Lego Bionicle Set Number 8947 Radiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces... This is something every language needs to be able to portray in a simple manner, after all 'Is Lego Bionicle Set Number 8947 Radiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces...' is awfully long.
this is like that meme where we google translate a language to see how many different words sound the same, then play a video where someone seems to be using all those words in a sentence. "fa fa fa fya fa fa fa fa fa fya fya fa..."
Love the lego set identity marking, random verb, and Last Thursdayism reference! What feels weird, though, is that a language that already incorporates RGB values would describe the primary colour of a bee based on an RGB value that is a particularly extreme example of an English colour word that English speakers use to describe a bee's colour rather than.... a typical RGB value for a bee? Like... no bee has a single spot of the colour 255, 255, 0. Guess that just makes it even more cursed, then.
eh, i just didn't feel like picking exact colours. i was never intending the colour counters to be meant solely for exact colours, general colours are good enough
This language is wild 😮 you think you could do a functional version of Newspeak next, or maybe just an actually decent newspeak dictionary? I’ve always wanted to see that, but I have like a potato knowledge at lexicography
Just to be pedantic, there are two consonants, not one, as they are not allophones. This is evidenced by the numbers 1, and 2, only being distinguished by palatalization. And it is the consonant that is palatalized.
@@ParallelOlelogram Palatalization isn't a sound on its own, but a change to a sound. Many English speakers may mispronounce it as a /j/ but in that case /j/ would just be phonemic as it causes a change in meaning.
@@mbg8733 What about palatal consonants like /ʎ/ or /ɲ/? They sound different from /lʲ/ and /nʲ/ My first language, Bulgarian, has plenty of occurrences of /ʲ/ after many consonants, and to me the consonants sound the same as normal and the /ʲ/ sounds like a separate sound that is slightly different from a full on /j/ That's just how I hear it. I'm no expert on phonetics so I could be wrong
@@ParallelOlelogram I think the reason they sound different is because they are slightly different sounds. And the reason a palatalized consonant sounds like multiple sounds is because you're pronouncing it wrong; it should be *one* consonant pronounced with a part of the tongue pushed to the hard palate. If it was two sounds, then /ʲ/ would be consonant, and therefore you would still have two consonants.
@@mbg8733I don't know, I've always heard it as separate when hearing or speaking Bulgarian. It always sounds like some kind of transition between the consonant and the vowel Now that you've mentioned it, I do feel my tongue touching the palate when saying some palatalized consonants, but not for all of them. For some consonants, I can't bring my tongue up there at the same time as the consonant itself, yet I can still add some palatalization that definitely sounds different from the plain /j/
Definitely, I agree. There are some things that I could have done differently, and some things that I could have included I could make a revision of the language in the future, so I could definitely add more counters which I had forgotten to add
I don't know which is worse, this or Seraphim. For one you'd need 7 mouths in order to commune The other you'd need 7 brains in order to compute... I love this. I absolutely love this!
So what I have learnt from this is 1- coding can be a conlang and inspire this, and that we can use this as a coding language. No joking I would like to see how that would look like and if it would downgrade or improve some coding stuff 2- bees haven't reached the industrial revolution, or so we think they didn't
1 - I'm definitely planning to make it even more like a coding language if I ever make a revamp of the language. Perhaps there could be if/else statements in the grammar, maybe booleans for questions 2 - The Bees have paid me quite handsomely to keep their current technological age a secret
Honestly you could make the consonant inventory a lot harder. Like, I would have made every consonant a different rhotic, or something almost unusable like an unvoiced bilabial trill.
I have never once had occasion to ask the question, "What would happen if you combined Bulgarian and CSS?" Thank you for answering it in the best possible way
i heard you explain it had one consonant and then talk about the numbers and i knew it was over. this is the most cursed language i could never imagine
Kind of, though I would refer to liquids as physical It definitely would have made more sense to instead have it be a state of matter counter. I don't know why I didn't think of that
unclear whether "primary element" is calculated based number of atoms, by volume, or by mass, all three would be different. For example is water considered primarily hydrogen or oxygen? (by number of atoms it'd be hydrogen, by mass or volume it'd be oxygen)
also how are aspects like the primary element handled for fictional/abstract nouns? do you use carbon for a cartoon bee for example? do you omit it? what about purely abstract concepts like geometric shapes?
I said that it is conveyed by the atomic number, so hydrogen would be 1, helium 2, etc And you're right, I should have specified it more. I would say that it is based on number of atoms. I should have also included the ability to add counters for secondary and tertiary elements like I did with the colours I'll definitely expand upon all of this more if I end up making a revision of the language
@@ParallelOlelogram ah, then living things should actually be referenced as hydrogen probably. for one thing living cells are mostly just water, for another organic chemicals that make up living structures are also predominantly hydrogen by number of atoms (molar mass)
@@Kris_not_Chris ah well that's my fault for not researching further. I just assumed carbon since living things on Earth are referred to as carbon-based I should definitely develop the chemical element system further if I make a revision of the language. Thanks for the feedback
It is a language beautiful and more elegant than French which doesn’t have a word for “part of Lego Bionicle set number 8947 Ridiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces”. Truly a failure of the French. Please make more Interdimensional Horrors Beyond Human Comprehension
This is actually something I want to do when I eventually learn more about linguistics and programming, languages. I am going to make a cursed conlang that is also a cursed esolang.
Why decimal? It should be Hexadecimal. If the colours weren't hexadecimal, Dozenal, Base-20 or Base-60 would be good candidates. Dimensionality should be "scalar" 0-dimensional, "scalar * signum" (1 dimensions), "complex" (scalar*e^(j*angle in radians)) (2-dimensinal), or "quarternion" (scalar*e^i*angle * e^j*angle * e^k*angle)" (3-dimensional). Why not convert all numbers to ln, so the number is e^(what you say), so that the scalar itself is consistent with directinal expansion (e^(s+i*a+j*b+k*c)). If you find a way to incorporate Octonions, PM me!
@@TrongleOlelogram No language that doesn't contain the necessary phonemes to say "Cthulhu f'taghn" or "Iä, Shub Niggurath" is worth learning, so sorry, but no.
Ah, you must have a cool uncle. I didn't even know that they spoke Interdimensional Horrors Beyond Human Comprehension on Neptune. As a being from the .̸̀̀.̴͎͛.̵̎̂.̵̄̓.̸͗̽.̵̌̾.̵̽͛.̷̑́.̷̊͛, I'm glad that our culture is spreading
ФѬ A'FAFAFA-FAFAFA-FAFAFA Я'FѢФЮФЮ A-FѢ-A'FѢФЮФЮ-FѢФЮФЮ-FѢФЮФЮ Я-FѢ-Я'FѢФЮФЮ Ѣ'FѢ Ꙓ'FѢ Ю'ФЯ Ъ'FѢ Ꙑ'FA-FA ФѨ.
FAF-FѢ ФЯFѢFꙘFѢ ФꙜ-FѢ!! 👍
No way, I can't believe that someone took the time out of their day to translate something into this language!
I estimate that the noun you were describing is the video itself based on the counters saying that the noun is opaque black and white, 2D and non-physical
There are some errors in the text, but that doesn't even matter, I can't believe that you actually translated something
this is the thing of all time
ФѬ A'FAFAFA-FAFAFA-FAFAFA Я'ФЯFAFA A-FѢ-A'FѢФЮФЮ-FѢФЮФЮ-FѢФЮФЮ Я-FѢ-Я'ФЯFAFA A-ФꙒ-A'FѢФЮФЮ-FAFAFA-FAFAFA Я-ФꙒ-Я'ФЯFAFA Ѣ’FѢ Ꙓ'FA Ю'ФЯ Ъ'FѢ Ꙑ'FѢ-FЪ Ѧ'ФЯФꙐФЮ ФѨ
ФЯФЮFAFꙘ ФŒ-FѢ ФЯF-ФЯ! 😊
@@ParallelOlelogram I'd love to know what I got wrong! I know for one I assumed this youtube video is Lego Bionicle set number 8947 Radiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces, as I am pretty sure it is not a rock.
I've been trying to translate something to the effect of "Nice video!" into the cursed conlang circus submissions I come across, it hasn't always been successful. I settled here for "This video [verb]s!" as I couldn't think of a way to express "good". I thought maybe something intangible but orangish yellow, with 7 spatial and 7 temporal dimensions, but wasn't sure that would come across very well (and I'd be bending the rules by going above 2 temporal dimensions).
Does your reply here mean i/my youtube profile picture is good? if so, 1: thank you very much! and 2: That means "ФЯF-ФЯ" _can_ be used to mean good, which I considered for a while before landing on the regular verb, and now I wish I'd kept it.
Overall this was a really fun language to translate things in and out of, the most fun I've had so far actually! Although the orthography was definitely annoying at times (which is good overall, cause, cursed).
@@JuniperHatesTwitterlikeHandles
Yes, you mistook the video for Radiak, skipping that counter would have worked. Another error was using 255 instead of 100 for max opacity on the opacity counters, since those are based on percentage. The other error was saying 2 time dimensions, since the video and everything that we know of only has one time dimension (moving forward or backward in time). Two time dimensions would be the equivalent of moving sideways in time which we aren't able to comprehend. The error was mistaking direction for dimension, since every dimension has two main directions (example: height is a dimension, and its two main directions are up and down)
I meant the closest thing that I could get to saying "thank you" was saying that you are good. I chose to describe your profile picture since that's the only reference I have of you. But it is a nice profile picture too! And I wasn't originally intending to have ФЯF-ФЯ also mean good, but decided why not, it would be easier
And by the way, I probably should have mentioned this in the video, but going over two time dimensions wouldn't break the rules. Counters for amounts of colours and dimensions can go as high as you want.
Oh, I completely agree with the orthography. I made the thing and even I hate writing it
Anyway, I'm glad you enjoyed my language!
in my language, we don’t say something is “not a rock”, we say it’s “part of Lego Bionicle set number 8947 Radiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces”, and i think that’s beautiful
indeed! "Lego Bionicle set number 8947 Radiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces" is such a useful phrase
@@ParallelOlelogramBut how do you tell the difference between two different Lego Bionicle set number 8947 Radiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces’s?
As someone who is both a conlanger and a software developer, I can't confirm things won't get much more cursed than 'CSS-inspired'.
It's not hex-based, quaternion-directional, and the number system also isn't based on transcendent constants like e and \pi. It doesn't have BCH representation of negative numbers and BCH Float representation of all numbers.
So all things considered, it's a language that just has exited being "blessed", but light years and ijk-rotations away from "cursed".
no... no. NO... NOO!O!!!!!!!!
or is it?
To speak a number, one must speak the binary representation of an IEEE standard float aloud.
You haven't seen the one with infinite matrices yet
I love how Interdimensional Horrors Beyond Human Comprehension spoken out almost sounds like fluent cockney
No horror that Real:(+1 is beyond my comprehension
Honestly the most cursed thing about this is that the counting system is base 10
I was thinking of using a different base, but ultimately decided to preserve my mental health
What’s the bad thing about using base 10?
@@kiboma4209 Base 10 (decimal) is not inherently bad, but:
- color values are based on a 24-bit RBG colorspace, but that method of defining colors is based on computers being binary and divides into pieces more evenly if written in hexadecimal (base 16) or another power of 2.
- color opacity is defined by percentage in base 10, so the relationship between a color values and opacity values is kind of arbitrary.
The less-cursed option would have been to either define color by percentage, or define opacity based on hexadecimal 100 (which is decimal 256), so all the values would be on the same scale.
Additional thought: a red/green/blue colorspace is kind of arbitrary and human-centric, so there's no good way to describe objects that are colors beyond human perception and understanding, which seems like it would be a problem for speakers of this language in particular.
@@theMuBotgood point, I didn't consider that
I love the algorithm slowly finding all of the submissions to the CCC2 and putting them in our recommendations
... 6 months later.
@@mohammadazad8350 I got recommended a lot just before submission deadline. Hence my comment is from 6 months ago
Not going to lie, I got very happy seeing you using cyrillic letters in this beautiful masterpiece of linguistics
As a native speaker of this languge, thank you for representing us
The*
So like, does the language cause the mental instability or, or vice-versa?
@@WowUrFcknHxC Both
@@WowUrFcknHxCBoth.
F
The language of ancient sentient machines formed by random chance in the Siberian wilderness.
Wha-
The delivery of “…afterwords you put a string of numbers corresponding to the RGB value of the color you are trying to communicate” made me lose my shit idk why I think it’s because the rest of the video up until that point was relatively tame
So you've made an easier version of Ithkuil. Congratulations
finally i can speak with my 16 dimensional friends
I'm so glad this got recommended to me, now I can finally decipher what my sleep paralysis demon has been trying to tell me all this time!
(Fr though, this is amazing, I love it so much)
Glad it's helpful! Hopefully you can decipher what I've been saying at night!
@@ParallelOlelogram wait, *_I've?_*
@@aykarainuhhhhh ignore that
I am definitely not a sleep paralysis demon
@@ParallelOlelogram It can’t be unsaid now!
Well maybe one needs to make a language where it can. Like you say “I’ve”, then you say “(’ve)⁻¹ I⁻¹” and listeners are conditioned to forget that you have ever started with “I’ve”.
@@05degrees that would be useful whenever I need to go haunt people at night
I mean wha-
when i saw the preview, i thought it was a language based on ascii encoding errors, ones when you have gibberish instead of actual text.
was not prepared to see a language with the most specific nouns and most unspecific everything else
I kind of put all my effort into the nouns, and then got lazy with the rest
The language could definitely use some revisions
@@ParallelOlelogramdidn't you say this was a *cursed* conlang contest submission?
@@nif4345yes
this language made me say "what the hell" out loud more times than i could count, 10/10
"Interdimensional Horrors Beyond Human Comprehension" Guess this is how the rest of the world percieves my language as well as other languages that use cyrillic😅
The language is definitely cursed, but especially with the industrial revolution part, it fit's perfectly into my D&D World (I'll just make up some fafefoo sounds and tell the players that the cosmic horror just told them to find Lego Bionicle set number 8947 Radiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces)
i love how audible your smile is when you're introducing different aspects of the langauge
Really? I felt like I sounded kind of monotone lol
@@ParallelOlelogram a happy monotone then
@@ParallelOlelogram I really can hear you smile. It makes me smile watching this :D
"Horrors beyond human comprehension" and it's in base ten
Maybe the real horror was the base 10 we made along the way
Paral: calls the language beyond human comprehension
Meanwhile me and my dad: hm, it does look usable, in like programing and stuff
The industrial revolution counter 😂
An average programmer from Rostov-upon-Don who have drunk far too many energy drinks before a sleepless worknight.
What lol
@@ParallelOlelogram yeah, I know. Great Novgorod would be more probable. They got all these birchbark letters with archaic Cyrillic
@@elkandevening let me introduce you to most towns in Bulgaria
If a language's lexicon was an assembly instruction set, then this language is like CPU microcode... I'm scared.
You should be >:)
Sometimes Windows doesn't recognise Cyrillic software and this is pretty much how the text looks in that case.
примерно так?
(This is UTF-8 decoded as Windows-1252)
@@05degrees exactly. But I think ive seen another version, with majority lowercase letters and mostly "e"
Something like ěəẹ èéê ëēė
@@fast1nakus That one is probably Win1251 → Win1252! Like ãîñóäàðûíÿ ìîÿ êîñòðîìà. For mostly e… IDK probably in longer texts it’ll be that way because of frequencies.
Lmao true
I love how the larger portion of your text read is describing all of the characters you need to include in the sentence. I guess when you're making a language about Interdimensional Horrors, you need to describe them really clearly!
The colour counter system made me laugh so hard, that's powerful
You say Verbs were inspired by Bulgarian.
But I say Verbs in this language were inspired by Hamlet.
You know, I have a strange phobia, I don't know if anyone else has. I'm really afraid of uppercase letters, some fonts. It's really disturbing.
Hopefully this video did not cause you too much pain
I think I understand what you mean, they can be oddly menacing
To fix the problem of nouns having the same number you could just raise the primes to each counter.
2^255 * 3^255 * 5^0 * 7^255 and so on
This will provide a different number for each noun with different properties, and the listener would only have to do a prime factorization on the fly while listening to understand.
In general this would be solvable with any orthogonal basis
Isn't the whole point of the sum that the nouns will get shorter and more practical after their first introduction? In that case, have fun reading out all those decimal places. 7^255 alone has over 200 of them, and that is just one of your factors. (You could make the numbers more manageable by removing the already unused precision of the RGB system and using a scale from 0 to 1, of course.) As much as this makes it more cursed, it would probably render pronouncing the full spoken sample infeasible, thus turning the language into a theoretical construct rather than an eligible submission for the CCC.
what
@@falkland_pinguin Someone is eventually gonna submit a language where the spoken sample takes hours upon hours and all of it is in the video
@@Nikola_M Well, if the spoken sample takes over 12h, you can no longer upload it to RUclips as a single video, so I'm pretty sure that's where the cutoff would be for how inefficient a CCC (not the system of measurement!) entry could be.
Is Lego Bionicle Set Number 8947 Radiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces...
This is something every language needs to be able to portray in a simple manner, after all 'Is Lego Bionicle Set Number 8947 Radiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces...' is awfully long.
but, its lego bionicle set 8947 radiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces
this lad has spoken in so many toungs he forgor how to "s"
this is like that meme where we google translate a language to see how many different words sound the same, then play a video where someone seems to be using all those words in a sentence. "fa fa fa fya fa fa fa fa fa fya fya fa..."
nope, i haven't heard of that before
the idea was only to have each syllable sound really similar
Love the lego set identity marking, random verb, and Last Thursdayism reference! What feels weird, though, is that a language that already incorporates RGB values would describe the primary colour of a bee based on an RGB value that is a particularly extreme example of an English colour word that English speakers use to describe a bee's colour rather than.... a typical RGB value for a bee? Like... no bee has a single spot of the colour 255, 255, 0. Guess that just makes it even more cursed, then.
eh, i just didn't feel like picking exact colours. i was never intending the colour counters to be meant solely for exact colours, general colours are good enough
@@ParallelOlelogram... and yet you put that level of precision in your language, and it's not even optional.
Outstanding work!😂
Oh god.. please put it out of its misery
This isn't what i expected from this video. But it is 100 times better, and I absolutely love how absolutely chaotic it is 10/10
This is the second one Google has shown me and I nominate it as the victor.
Thank you
hopefully ŋə is as like-minded
The dedication got me FLOORED. This was so cool to watch. Hello from recommended land👏✨👏✨
This language is wild 😮 you think you could do a functional version of Newspeak next, or maybe just an actually decent newspeak dictionary? I’ve always wanted to see that, but I have like a potato knowledge at lexicography
Eh, conlanging isn't the main focus of my channel, but I could do more of it in the future eventually
Just to be pedantic, there are two consonants, not one, as they are not allophones. This is evidenced by the numbers 1, and 2, only being distinguished by palatalization.
And it is the consonant that is palatalized.
What do you mean?
The only consonant phoneme is still /f/
The palatalization /ʲ/ comes after the consonant
@@ParallelOlelogram Palatalization isn't a sound on its own, but a change to a sound.
Many English speakers may mispronounce it as a /j/ but in that case /j/ would just be phonemic as it causes a change in meaning.
@@mbg8733 What about palatal consonants like /ʎ/ or /ɲ/? They sound different from /lʲ/ and /nʲ/
My first language, Bulgarian, has plenty of occurrences of /ʲ/ after many consonants, and to me the consonants sound the same as normal and the /ʲ/ sounds like a separate sound that is slightly different from a full on /j/
That's just how I hear it. I'm no expert on phonetics so I could be wrong
@@ParallelOlelogram I think the reason they sound different is because they are slightly different sounds.
And the reason a palatalized consonant sounds like multiple sounds is because you're pronouncing it wrong; it should be *one* consonant pronounced with a part of the tongue pushed to the hard palate.
If it was two sounds, then /ʲ/ would be consonant, and therefore you would still have two consonants.
@@mbg8733I don't know, I've always heard it as separate when hearing or speaking Bulgarian. It always sounds like some kind of transition between the consonant and the vowel
Now that you've mentioned it, I do feel my tongue touching the palate when saying some palatalized consonants, but not for all of them. For some consonants, I can't bring my tongue up there at the same time as the consonant itself, yet I can still add some palatalization that definitely sounds different from the plain /j/
Best IAL ever made.
Why make language that everyone can understand, when you can make language that no one can understand?
This is such an amusingly computer science sided take on this I love it
I can see how you can expand on this system by adding a few physical counters, honestly would be efficient if everyone knows each word.
Definitely, I agree. There are some things that I could have done differently, and some things that I could have included
I could make a revision of the language in the future, so I could definitely add more counters which I had forgotten to add
This language is gorgeous and I thank you so much for creating it.
I don't know which is worse, this or Seraphim.
For one you'd need 7 mouths in order to commune
The other you'd need 7 brains in order to compute...
I love this. I absolutely love this!
what if....... we combine them?? 👁
So what I have learnt from this is
1- coding can be a conlang and inspire this, and that we can use this as a coding language. No joking I would like to see how that would look like and if it would downgrade or improve some coding stuff
2- bees haven't reached the industrial revolution, or so we think they didn't
1 - I'm definitely planning to make it even more like a coding language if I ever make a revamp of the language. Perhaps there could be if/else statements in the grammar, maybe booleans for questions
2 - The Bees have paid me quite handsomely to keep their current technological age a secret
hey are you secretly a beehive? asking because you speak with a suspiciously heavy emphasis on final voiced sibilants...
Well, my first language can't have voiced consonants at the end of words, so I'm probably overcompensating for that when speaking English
I bet this language can be used to deter Walmart Karens.
I'll keep that in mind
“Idk if I have any regular viewers”
*now you do*
The ending got me. Great cursed language
Oh hell yeah. I watched the one about Seraphim and then this one shows up? Perfect.
Honestly you could make the consonant inventory a lot harder. Like, I would have made every consonant a different rhotic, or something almost unusable like an unvoiced bilabial trill.
You could make a new conlang in the time it takes to say one sentence.
Now that is what I call productivity
well i now know which new conlang to learn
Make sure to have a calculator nearby if you want to speak it
I have never once had occasion to ask the question, "What would happen if you combined Bulgarian and CSS?" Thank you for answering it in the best possible way
“We’ve just finished saying: Good Morning.”
it’s funny how he makes dimensional rifts in space time just for us to comprehend his language that he made up
😎
1:32 “Numbres”
i heard you explain it had one consonant and then talk about the numbers and i knew it was over. this is the most cursed language i could never imagine
isnt physical and non-physical basically solid and non-solid
Kind of, though I would refer to liquids as physical
It definitely would have made more sense to instead have it be a state of matter counter. I don't know why I didn't think of that
my right ear loved this video
this video loved your right ear too
@@ParallelOlelogram did it love mine? uwu :3
@@Dozee .̷̰̈́.̵̌̾.̵̄̓.̵̎̂ .̵̌̾.̶̢̓.̷̑́ .̵.̴͎͛.̶̙̑.̷̑́.̓̓
i dont know how the christ you ever created this but it’s cool as jesus
This is truly the conlang of all time
Why does this remind me of "Dog of Wisdom"?
What does "Fee Fi Fo Fum" mean in this language?
It means "I am rapidly approaching your general location"
My source: me
@@ParallelOlelogram17
unclear whether "primary element" is calculated based number of atoms, by volume, or by mass, all three would be different. For example is water considered primarily hydrogen or oxygen? (by number of atoms it'd be hydrogen, by mass or volume it'd be oxygen)
also how are aspects like the primary element handled for fictional/abstract nouns? do you use carbon for a cartoon bee for example? do you omit it? what about purely abstract concepts like geometric shapes?
I said that it is conveyed by the atomic number, so hydrogen would be 1, helium 2, etc
And you're right, I should have specified it more. I would say that it is based on number of atoms. I should have also included the ability to add counters for secondary and tertiary elements like I did with the colours
I'll definitely expand upon all of this more if I end up making a revision of the language
@@Kris_not_Chris And it is not necessary to always use all counters, so one can skip the element counter if they are describing any abstract concepts
@@ParallelOlelogram ah, then living things should actually be referenced as hydrogen probably. for one thing living cells are mostly just water, for another organic chemicals that make up living structures are also predominantly hydrogen by number of atoms (molar mass)
@@Kris_not_Chris ah well that's my fault for not researching further. I just assumed carbon since living things on Earth are referred to as carbon-based
I should definitely develop the chemical element system further if I make a revision of the language. Thanks for the feedback
I like your voice
I think I give too much of my life to useless concepts, but that thing is a drug
Наконец-то я смогу понимать полетевший юникод и названия треков жанра witch house
съжалявам, но не говоря на руски
@@ParallelOlelogramHe says “I will finally understand broken unicode and titles of witchhouse tracks”
I like this conlang.
It made me wanna ФЯ
It is a language beautiful and more elegant than French which doesn’t have a word for “part of Lego Bionicle set number 8947 Ridiak released in 2008 containing 16 pieces”. Truly a failure of the French.
Please make more Interdimensional Horrors Beyond Human Comprehension
The more I watched the worse it got... I guess that was the goal so good job! (it hurts though)
Why did it feel like I just played the world’s weirdest game of dnd
This is actually something I want to do when I eventually learn more about linguistics and programming, languages. I am going to make a cursed conlang that is also a cursed esolang.
Google doc for the language:
docs.google.com/document/d/1f2wDx3MsobWj-FN26PCb_5JgOw8OIArGURkjTWz47F0/
thank you for re-creating the greek language
fafya fya!👍
Some people might think this sounds like nothing more than a lot of faffing around. But they are fu and fa between.
LOL I just got the joke after 2 days of wondering what this means
Good one
This is simillar to ent speech but with numbers
absolutely true, I bet ent speech is basically this - wait that gives me an idea, wait and see what I do for the next competition
@@thevalarauka101 Yea boi
this has a similar patten to the weird descriptions on facebook when an image doesnt load correctly
This language's look reminds me of how cyrillic text looks, when it's corrupted by changing the encoding method
The 7 is pronounced like 4 in danish
Interesting
hi, i just found your channel and it looks cool
Thanks!
When can we expect HDR support in this language?
by installing the DLC
Watching this makes me realize the Voynich Manuscript will never ever be deciphered because it's probably just a cursed conlang.
"Oh cool, a conlang- wait, why is there CSS- WAIT WHY IS THERE A PERIODIC TABLE??"
фъф
That can win ngl
Why decimal? It should be Hexadecimal.
If the colours weren't hexadecimal, Dozenal, Base-20 or Base-60 would be good candidates.
Dimensionality should be "scalar" 0-dimensional, "scalar * signum" (1 dimensions), "complex" (scalar*e^(j*angle in radians)) (2-dimensinal), or "quarternion" (scalar*e^i*angle * e^j*angle * e^k*angle)" (3-dimensional).
Why not convert all numbers to ln, so the number is e^(what you say), so that the scalar itself is consistent with directinal expansion (e^(s+i*a+j*b+k*c)).
If you find a way to incorporate Octonions, PM me!
i dont understand, can you tell me this in Interdimensional Horrors Beyond Human Comprehension
@@TrongleOlelogram No language that doesn't contain the necessary phonemes to say "Cthulhu f'taghn" or "Iä, Shub Niggurath" is worth learning, so sorry, but no.
Me: add effects to it so it ain't gonna sound human
Cursed Language: This
Fee-fi-fo-fum you created the language of the giant from "Jack and the beanstalk"
ive comprehended them.
They said it could not be done
Wait are those all the symbols from Keep Talking and Nobody Explodes 😂
I don't see what's cursed about this, the audio sample sounds like perfectly normal Swedish to me.
PLEASE id love to see an extension of this with more specific descriptors
windows key -> "mono" -> mono audio -> on
My uncle taught me this language when I was 7
I think he was also from Neptune
Ah, you must have a cool uncle. I didn't even know that they spoke Interdimensional Horrors Beyond Human Comprehension on Neptune. As a being from the .̸̀̀.̴͎͛.̵̎̂.̵̄̓.̸͗̽.̵̌̾.̵̽͛.̷̑́.̷̊͛, I'm glad that our culture is spreading
It scares and saddens me that this makes me happy.
Oh-
0:17 it literally says how to pronounce Agma Shwa on screen
Absolute banger
no one reading/hearing this sentence has a clue what the verbs mean.