You only get cavitation at launch, no power loss or anything just not going. You got on plane quicker than GPR. Maybe you mean gap from wear ring & impeller is to big causing less thrust.
@@insainperson6018 never ridden an ultra but i own a gpr. The shallow hull and light weight make it super responsive, it’ll throw me off easily. I do like the ultra, but I can’t imagine an almost 1000lb ski handling well
@@Xixu.co.6 it weighs 150 more than your gpr dude. And its a bit bigger to make up for it. Definitely handles better and takes wakes at high speeds without being extremely rough
You only get cavitation at launch, no power loss or anything just not going. You got on plane quicker than GPR. Maybe you mean gap from wear ring & impeller is to big causing less thrust.
Never try to race with 2 stroke jetski.
ill race any 2 stroke w my 310 hp gp1800 or my 330 hp rxp. i used to own a 1300 r . nothing like newer tech. no replacement for displacement.
@@jasonmekush5280But if it was displacement for displacement the two stroke would cook that 4 stroke.
@@jasonmekush5280 if there is no replacement for displacement why did they have to used forced induction on the newer tech you speak of ?
Go gp
how a jetski handles > top speed
Well the gpr still wins then. One of the best handling skis ever made
@@Xixu.co.6 road both. Gpr has top speed and ultra has handling
@@insainperson6018 never ridden an ultra but i own a gpr. The shallow hull and light weight make it super responsive, it’ll throw me off easily. I do like the ultra, but I can’t imagine an almost 1000lb ski handling well
@@Xixu.co.6 it weighs 150 more than your gpr dude. And its a bit bigger to make up for it. Definitely handles better and takes wakes at high speeds without being extremely rough
@@Xixu.co.6 only reason the gpr has more top speed is the impeller ratio.
gave you a laugh
K ultra 🤣🐢🐢🐢