It’s early, but I will say the expectations placed on SMU coming off a lifetime of G5 league play was ridiculous. I’ve seen them picked 5th or higher which stuns me. They will get better, but it may take years to get acclimated. Hope for 6-6 and a bowl entry.
@@7inentertainment509 nah. I'm on those and this is "Things that didn't happen" for 200, Alex. Nonzero number maybe but this is not the average temperature of the fanbase.
Well the "whole 9 yards" not making football sense is because it's not from football. 9 yards was the length of the.50 cal ammo belts on WWII fighter planes, so if you shot at the enemy till you had no ammo left you let them have the whole 9 yards.
@@LockedOnCollegeFootball I always assumed it came from barely getting inside the ten meaning you would have to go the whole nine yards. So I googled it. The phrase apparently pre-dates WW2 and maybe even football. It seems that Spencer had it right. It is probably just nonsensical but it stuck.
Really? BYU, UCF, CINCY and HOUSTON all had losing records in-conference and overall last season. HOUSTON lost to RICE. CINCY lost to MIAMI(OH). SMU is expected to be a top competitor on Day 1?
Yes. All the idiots of the ACC proclaimed that SMU was a great add and would be 9-3 to 10-2 in their first season in the ACC because having a “great” team and ACC schedule navigable and the ACC is weak and winnable; which several of these are true. The ACC is the weakest of the A4 in football and is weaker than probably 1-2 G5/Non-A4 conferences. SMU will lose to BYU, TCU, FSU, Lou, and probably either Duke or Cal or both. But all the nonsense that the Ponies of SMU are going to be better than the rest of the ACC and better than the four G5 (BYU pagans were G5 before joining the Big12 last year and truth) schools that the Big12 added that had earned the right to move up were ludicrous and utter rubbish comments and prognostications. ACC would have been better off adding a Memphis or CCU or the other two last members of the PAC than agreeing on adding SMU. By the way Rice and Miami-Ohio were good to great teams last season and season before that and are historical rivals for Houston and Cincinnati and shows how little you know about football and sports overall given your propensity to spout off inaccurate statistics and such. Nevada has been bad for awhile “Boy”, and maybe you should change your approach to this and come at this with a different approach that would suit your view and false equivalence narratives. Nevada is an inferior football team no matter if SMU was in the AAC or ACC or even the almighty SEC. Nevada and New Mexico and two other MWC schools were predicted and expected to win no more than 3 games a piece this season if that many for a reason. I said SMU will go either 5-7 or 7-5 but no worse than 4-8 and no better than 8-4. Nevada looks like the school that had joined an Autonomous League not SMU in that contest last night. Florida State losing to a conference opponent in a conference game on a neutral field to a bowl winning team is no shame in that contrary to what many pundits say. But SMU losing for 3 quarters and 3/4 of the 4th quarter to a vastly inferior team in Nevada is unacceptable. Rhett Lashlee and his staff and players talked too much this offseason. If UNC loses to a bad Minnesota, which could happen, and other marquee non conference games where the ACC teams are heavily favored; then the ACC will be getting 1 team and one team only in the playoffs because so weak.
@@michaelwall3393 No. I've seen no such ACC proclamations, but admittedly don't watch or read much from ACC sources. Measured by top-level success over the past 25 years, the ACC is a rough peer of the B1G. The BIG12 is clearly the worst P4 (by far).
Can’t win as an acc fan. When when one or two teams dominate, “the conference is not competitive” but when the conference becomes competitive and the top teams struggle against a conference opponent, “the ACC is doomed”. Pick a side.
As for changing QBs working out I can think of Caleb Williams over Spencer rattler, fifita in Arizona last year, Avery Johnson over will Howard, rocko Beckt, Bennett over jt Daniels, trevor lawerence over Kelly Bryant now granted there’s many different factors in all of these like injuries and such but sometimes you don’t know if a kid has it until he’s under the bright Saturday lights
SMU sucking doesn't make it one of the worst days in recent memory for the ACC. If anything the FSU/GT game was a good thing for the ACC, since it proved their depth.
UConn has the New York/New England TV market (enormous), the best basketball, very good baseball, soccer, etc. The football program won two Big East power conference championships in ten years and frequently had sell outs (40K). And they’d be the top academic school in the Big 12 per US News. UConn has a lot to offer.
Only one school from ACC is most likely making the playoffs. I originally thought two teams would but SMU showed they don’t belong and showed ACC is weaker than anticipated but ironically probably deeper than expected as well.
@@tylernelson3343 And? I could see any BIG12 expansion hurting WASHST and OREST's chances of landing there, but the ACC had been passing on UCONN for years.
People seemed pretty high on SMU in the ACC before the season. Maybe too high, it's still a big step from the G5 to the P4. And SMU lost to Boston College in their bowl game last season.
These MWC teams are pesky. I’m not surprised. Remember TT@Wyo last year and didn’t Kansas struggle w/this same UNR team on that same day if I’m not wrong at all ? Props to GT. Not surprised with this one either. Remember UCF was dominating them up 17-0. The BAM! Before you knew it GT was back in the game. They are a creeper team for sure. 😂
So great to talk football again. Tired of the realignment nonsense. Didn’t even know Bronco Mendenhall was coaching in New Mexico. They were playing well too v a very good fcs team. Wondering why he isn’t Coaching in the big xii. Then they lose. Wow. I wonder if byu should still approach Mendenhall if Sitake can’t cut it anymore. He did a great job first time around w the byu program. 🤷🏼♂️🤔
Come on! This was SMU vs Nevada. There is not much difference between these programs. Not commensurate with your angle on the game. If Nevada didn't collapse I'd have just shrugged and not given it a second look. Really would a Nevada win have been that surprising?? Really???
Oregon will beat Boise State because I think and expect Boise State will lose at Georgia Southern the week before. I expect the first two weekends of college football to be very successful for the state of Georgia with their two Autonomous Colleges and the three Non Autonomous Colleges.
Yes and no. GT is an ACC member and did go to a bowl game and win again. So it’s not a bad thing that GT upset FLASt. SMU looking like absolute garbage for 3 full quarters and 1/2 of the 4th almost is a bad look for the ACC. But I will also say that the MWC squandering victories like they did and Hawaii late last night won by three touchdowns but didn’t look like that for about 3 quarters and what I expect this upcoming weekend and weekend 3 but week 2 of college football (call it what it is folks and stop this week zero or week 12.5 later on in early to mid November and count correctly damn it!); I could see MWC being more overconfident and overrated than even west coast teams think about themselves by the media. But I don’t want to start seeing top G5/6 schools dodging each other or avoiding top teams in any other conference just to have a fictitious solid record. I am not saying UTSA or Boise shouldn’t schedule an Akron or LaTech or Colorado St or ULM or Temple in non conference games. I don’t want them to schedule one decent to top notch A4 team and rest being bottom G5 or one mid level to bottom level FCS school. Every conference and especially the Non Autonomy conferences need to address the non conference slate similar to how the AAC has done so previously and hopefully will continue to do so. No Autonomy schools should be playing FCS schools but the Non Autonomy can and should but needs to be done within the first 5-6 weeks of the season and I am counting week-0 as week-1 for common sense purposes and rational reasoning for goodness sake. This would mean all A4 schools and including Notre Dame would play no less than two to three Non Autonomy schools in non conference schedules, depending upon having 3-4-5 non conference games. I say kind of combine what the MWC is doing this year and possibly next season and what the AAC has always done for the past few years in non conference games. But make all conferences play 7 not 8 or 9 conference games and all play two A4 teams from two different A4 conferences and only the G5/6 get to play FCS schools and all done by first weekend in October against FCS teams and nothing but FBS teams for rest of the season. No division play but pods possible and A4 schools have to play at least 2 A4 teams in non conference games and two to three Non Autonomy schools in non conference games. The Non Autonomy get two A4 teams minimum and two Non Autonomy schools minimum and only one FCS school in non conference games if the Non Autonomy teams want to schedule a FCS team to play. This would make at least the Conferences somewhat competitive equally and would make analysis easier for which teams and which conferences are stronger and better than others and deserve and earn a playoff spot or certain conferences getting multiple teams in the playoffs as would eliminate the subjective opinion and conjecture and actually have objective measurements and results to go by. But this makes too much sense and maybe too much money and intrigue evenly distributed among all D1 teams and therefore would not happen because it would solve the bickering.
The creator clearly has a bias against the ACC. This is ridiculous. So what FSU lost to another ACC team. GT gave Georgia all they could handle last year. Since when does a new school in the league playing dictate the worthiness of the rest of the existing teams?
Yes and no. GT is an ACC member and did go to a bowl game and win again. So it’s not a bad thing that GT upset FLASt. SMU looking like absolute garbage for 3 full quarters and 1/2 of the 4th almost is a bad look for the ACC. But I will also say that the MWC squandering victories like they did and Hawaii late last night won by three touchdowns but didn’t look like that for about 3 quarters and what I expect this upcoming weekend and weekend 3 but week 2 of college football (call it what it is folks and stop this week zero or week 12.5 later on in early to mid November and count correctly damn it!); I could see MWC being more overconfident and overrated than even west coast teams think about themselves by the media. But I don’t want to start seeing top G5/6 schools dodging each other or avoiding top teams in any other conference just to have a fictitious solid record. I am not saying UTSA or Boise shouldn’t schedule an Akron or LaTech or Colorado St or ULM or Temple in non conference games. I don’t want them to schedule one decent to top notch A4 team and rest being bottom G5 or one mid level to bottom level FCS school. Every conference and especially the Non Autonomy conferences need to address the non conference slate similar to how the AAC has done so previously and hopefully will continue to do so. No Autonomy schools should be playing FCS schools but the Non Autonomy can and should but needs to be done within the first 5-6 weeks of the season and I am counting week-0 as week-1 for common sense purposes and rational reasoning for goodness sake. This would mean all A4 schools and including Notre Dame would play no less than two to three Non Autonomy schools in non conference schedules, depending upon having 3-4-5 non conference games. I say kind of combine what the MWC is doing this year and possibly next season and what the AAC has always done for the past few years in non conference games. But make all conferences play 7 not 8 or 9 conference games and all play two A4 teams from two different A4 conferences and only the G5/6 get to play FCS schools and all done by first weekend in October against FCS teams and nothing but FBS teams for rest of the season. No division play but pods possible and A4 schools have to play at least 2 A4 teams in non conference games and two to three Non Autonomy schools in non conference games. The Non Autonomy get two A4 teams minimum and two Non Autonomy schools minimum and only one FCS school in non conference games if the Non Autonomy teams want to schedule a FCS team to play. This would make at least the Conferences somewhat competitive equally and would make analysis easier for which teams and which conferences are stronger and better than others and deserve and earn a playoff spot or certain conferences getting multiple teams in the playoffs as would eliminate the subjective opinion and conjecture and actually have objective measurements and results to go by. But this makes too much sense and maybe too much money and intrigue evenly distributed among all D1 teams and therefore would not happen because it would solve the bickering.
SEC gets 4, B1G get 4, G5 gets 1, ACC and Big12 (combined) get the last 3. Unless Notre Dame gets the last spot. That's just based on last season's records and the P2 clearly having more top teams.
It’s early, but I will say the expectations placed on SMU coming off a lifetime of G5 league play was ridiculous. I’ve seen them picked 5th or higher which stuns me. They will get better, but it may take years to get acclimated. Hope for 6-6 and a bowl entry.
SMUs own fans were all over message boards and comments sections picking themselves to finish high
@@7inentertainment509 nah. I'm on those and this is "Things that didn't happen" for 200, Alex. Nonzero number maybe but this is not the average temperature of the fanbase.
This is why pre-season polls are useless. Let teams play at least 4-5 games before the first polls come out.
Over reaction is strong. Settle Down Man U Tripping
SMU played horrible for 50 minutes. They came out flat. Then they played like SMU for 10 minutes. Relax.
Well the "whole 9 yards" not making football sense is because it's not from football.
9 yards was the length of the.50 cal ammo belts on WWII fighter planes, so if you shot at the enemy till you had no ammo left you let them have the whole 9 yards.
Well that makes a lot more sense!
@@LockedOnCollegeFootball I always assumed it came from barely getting inside the ten meaning you would have to go the whole nine yards.
So I googled it. The phrase apparently pre-dates WW2 and maybe even football. It seems that Spencer had it right. It is probably just nonsensical but it stuck.
@@frictionhitch I'm sticking with whole 10 yards.
@@LockedOnCollegeFootball Which is basically like saying the whole 9 METERS!
Perhaps you should be watching soccer traitor!
Really? BYU, UCF, CINCY and HOUSTON all had losing records in-conference and overall last season. HOUSTON lost to RICE. CINCY lost to MIAMI(OH). SMU is expected to be a top competitor on Day 1?
thank you, what did the acc do to america?
Yes. All the idiots of the ACC proclaimed that SMU was a great add and would be 9-3 to 10-2 in their first season in the ACC because having a “great” team and ACC schedule navigable and the ACC is weak and winnable; which several of these are true. The ACC is the weakest of the A4 in football and is weaker than probably 1-2 G5/Non-A4 conferences. SMU will lose to BYU, TCU, FSU, Lou, and probably either Duke or Cal or both. But all the nonsense that the Ponies of SMU are going to be better than the rest of the ACC and better than the four G5 (BYU pagans were G5 before joining the Big12 last year and truth) schools that the Big12 added that had earned the right to move up were ludicrous and utter rubbish comments and prognostications. ACC would have been better off adding a Memphis or CCU or the other two last members of the PAC than agreeing on adding SMU. By the way Rice and Miami-Ohio were good to great teams last season and season before that and are historical rivals for Houston and Cincinnati and shows how little you know about football and sports overall given your propensity to spout off inaccurate statistics and such. Nevada has been bad for awhile “Boy”, and maybe you should change your approach to this and come at this with a different approach that would suit your view and false equivalence narratives. Nevada is an inferior football team no matter if SMU was in the AAC or ACC or even the almighty SEC. Nevada and New Mexico and two other MWC schools were predicted and expected to win no more than 3 games a piece this season if that many for a reason. I said SMU will go either 5-7 or 7-5 but no worse than 4-8 and no better than 8-4. Nevada looks like the school that had joined an Autonomous League not SMU in that contest last night. Florida State losing to a conference opponent in a conference game on a neutral field to a bowl winning team is no shame in that contrary to what many pundits say. But SMU losing for 3 quarters and 3/4 of the 4th quarter to a vastly inferior team in Nevada is unacceptable. Rhett Lashlee and his staff and players talked too much this offseason. If UNC loses to a bad Minnesota, which could happen, and other marquee non conference games where the ACC teams are heavily favored; then the ACC will be getting 1 team and one team only in the playoffs because so weak.
@@michaelwall3393BYU and TCU are definitely winnable for SMU.
@@michaelwall3393 No. I've seen no such ACC proclamations, but admittedly don't watch or read much from ACC sources. Measured by top-level success over the past 25 years, the ACC is a rough peer of the B1G. The BIG12 is clearly the worst P4 (by far).
The proposal is for UConn to join for basketball and stay independent in football until the end of the Big 12 current media deal.
Can’t win as an acc fan. When when one or two teams dominate, “the conference is not competitive” but when the conference becomes competitive and the top teams struggle against a conference opponent, “the ACC is doomed”. Pick a side.
Third side: SMU is not a top ACC team yet -- they are stepping up a level from the G5 to play with the big boys. And Nevada is a bad MWC G5 team.
As for changing QBs working out I can think of Caleb Williams over Spencer rattler, fifita in Arizona last year, Avery Johnson over will Howard, rocko Beckt, Bennett over jt Daniels, trevor lawerence over Kelly Bryant now granted there’s many different factors in all of these like injuries and such but sometimes you don’t know if a kid has it until he’s under the bright Saturday lights
SMU not being great week one is not a negative for the ACC.
Maybe GT is a good team
BTW it would be far from ACC's worst memory. Not even close to a bad memory.
SMU sucking doesn't make it one of the worst days in recent memory for the ACC. If anything the FSU/GT game was a good thing for the ACC, since it proved their depth.
UConn has the New York/New England TV market (enormous), the best basketball, very good baseball, soccer, etc. The football program won two Big East power conference championships in ten years and frequently had sell outs (40K). And they’d be the top academic school in the Big 12 per US News. UConn has a lot to offer.
It's still a huge embarrassing win, especially against MWC!!! Not good! I see loses coming!
Put my money on NC state and Clemson/miami making the playoff
Only one school from ACC is most likely making the playoffs. I originally thought two teams would but SMU showed they don’t belong and showed ACC is weaker than anticipated but ironically probably deeper than expected as well.
@@michaelwall3393 So moronic. The play by likely the worst ACC team in its first year in a major conference in decades means something?
Nevada's OC makes $800k/year. To call an RPO from the Gun in your own endzone. I'm clearly in the wrong profession
🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯 i turned that smu game off. Shoulda watched it
It was rather epic.
Why does this guy think SMU is some world beater?
When did I say those words?
Pony Express gonna get caught running out of gas before season's end.
Spencer McLaughlin I have a question for you. If the Big 12 does add UConn to the conference how does that affect the ACC and PAC 2.
Why would it affect either?
@@tarheel7406 since we are talking about realignment
@@tylernelson3343 And?
I could see any BIG12 expansion hurting WASHST and OREST's chances of landing there, but the ACC had been passing on UCONN for years.
People seemed pretty high on SMU in the ACC before the season. Maybe too high, it's still a big step from the G5 to the P4. And SMU lost to Boston College in their bowl game last season.
So where the other bids coming from???!
These MWC teams are pesky. I’m not surprised. Remember TT@Wyo last year and didn’t Kansas struggle w/this same UNR team on that same day if I’m not wrong at all ?
Props to GT. Not surprised with this one either. Remember UCF was dominating them up 17-0. The BAM! Before you knew it GT was back in the game. They are a creeper team for sure. 😂
So great to talk football again. Tired of the realignment nonsense. Didn’t even know Bronco Mendenhall was coaching in New Mexico. They were playing well too v a very good fcs team. Wondering why he isn’t Coaching in the big xii. Then they lose. Wow. I wonder if byu should still approach Mendenhall if Sitake can’t cut it anymore. He did a great job first time around w the byu program. 🤷🏼♂️🤔
Come on! This was SMU vs Nevada. There is not much difference between these programs. Not commensurate with your angle on the game. If Nevada didn't collapse I'd have just shrugged and not given it a second look. Really would a Nevada win have been that surprising?? Really???
Ur messing will his “content”…He has to have something to talk about..😂😂…It’s the ACC after all..
“The whole nine yards” idiom isn’t based on football. That’s why it isn’t 10 yards. Good show though.
That makes more sense, glad you enjoy!
We still got Mia,ncst, Louisville Virginia tech like you bias bro
I'm a lot more afraid for the ducks playing boise state now
Oregon will beat Boise State because I think and expect Boise State will lose at Georgia Southern the week before. I expect the first two weekends of college football to be very successful for the state of Georgia with their two Autonomous Colleges and the three Non Autonomous Colleges.
Yes and no. GT is an ACC member and did go to a bowl game and win again. So it’s not a bad thing that GT upset FLASt. SMU looking like absolute garbage for 3 full quarters and 1/2 of the 4th almost is a bad look for the ACC. But I will also say that the MWC squandering victories like they did and Hawaii late last night won by three touchdowns but didn’t look like that for about 3 quarters and what I expect this upcoming weekend and weekend 3 but week 2 of college football (call it what it is folks and stop this week zero or week 12.5 later on in early to mid November and count correctly damn it!); I could see MWC being more overconfident and overrated than even west coast teams think about themselves by the media.
But I don’t want to start seeing top G5/6 schools dodging each other or avoiding top teams in any other conference just to have a fictitious solid record. I am not saying UTSA or Boise shouldn’t schedule an Akron or LaTech or Colorado St or ULM or Temple in non conference games. I don’t want them to schedule one decent to top notch A4 team and rest being bottom G5 or one mid level to bottom level FCS school.
Every conference and especially the Non Autonomy conferences need to address the non conference slate similar to how the AAC has done so previously and hopefully will continue to do so. No Autonomy schools should be playing FCS schools but the Non Autonomy can and should but needs to be done within the first 5-6 weeks of the season and I am counting week-0 as week-1 for common sense purposes and rational reasoning for goodness sake. This would mean all A4 schools and including Notre Dame would play no less than two to three Non Autonomy schools in non conference schedules, depending upon having 3-4-5 non conference games.
I say kind of combine what the MWC is doing this year and possibly next season and what the AAC has always done for the past few years in non conference games. But make all conferences play 7 not 8 or 9 conference games and all play two A4 teams from two different A4 conferences and only the G5/6 get to play FCS schools and all done by first weekend in October against FCS teams and nothing but FBS teams for rest of the season. No division play but pods possible and A4 schools have to play at least 2 A4 teams in non conference games and two to three Non Autonomy schools in non conference games.
The Non Autonomy get two A4 teams minimum and two Non Autonomy schools minimum and only one FCS school in non conference games if the Non Autonomy teams want to schedule a FCS team to play. This would make at least the Conferences somewhat competitive equally and would make analysis easier for which teams and which conferences are stronger and better than others and deserve and earn a playoff spot or certain conferences getting multiple teams in the playoffs as would eliminate the subjective opinion and conjecture and actually have objective measurements and results to go by. But this makes too much sense and maybe too much money and intrigue evenly distributed among all D1 teams and therefore would not happen because it would solve the bickering.
i mean i watched this game, the smu guys seemed a bit small, give them a couple years to bulk up.
You are overreacting from week 0. If anything the ACC looks stronger when GT beats FSU. Ridiculuous take.
The creator clearly has a bias against the ACC. This is ridiculous. So what FSU lost to another ACC team. GT gave Georgia all they could handle last year. Since when does a new school in the league playing dictate the worthiness of the rest of the existing teams?
Who is your team? Come on bro what are you talking about
Nobody cares about smu but you sorry they disappointed you bro your laughable real talk!
Like this entire season I'm holding you to what you talking bout you delusional
Spencer 😂
Yes????
Contrary to all the pony phallus slurping clowns in the comments I think SMU is a clownshow and will end up .500 at best
That isn't happening in the comments lol
The ACC looks so bad today
Yes and no. GT is an ACC member and did go to a bowl game and win again. So it’s not a bad thing that GT upset FLASt. SMU looking like absolute garbage for 3 full quarters and 1/2 of the 4th almost is a bad look for the ACC. But I will also say that the MWC squandering victories like they did and Hawaii late last night won by three touchdowns but didn’t look like that for about 3 quarters and what I expect this upcoming weekend and weekend 3 but week 2 of college football (call it what it is folks and stop this week zero or week 12.5 later on in early to mid November and count correctly damn it!); I could see MWC being more overconfident and overrated than even west coast teams think about themselves by the media.
But I don’t want to start seeing top G5/6 schools dodging each other or avoiding top teams in any other conference just to have a fictitious solid record. I am not saying UTSA or Boise shouldn’t schedule an Akron or LaTech or Colorado St or ULM or Temple in non conference games. I don’t want them to schedule one decent to top notch A4 team and rest being bottom G5 or one mid level to bottom level FCS school.
Every conference and especially the Non Autonomy conferences need to address the non conference slate similar to how the AAC has done so previously and hopefully will continue to do so. No Autonomy schools should be playing FCS schools but the Non Autonomy can and should but needs to be done within the first 5-6 weeks of the season and I am counting week-0 as week-1 for common sense purposes and rational reasoning for goodness sake. This would mean all A4 schools and including Notre Dame would play no less than two to three Non Autonomy schools in non conference schedules, depending upon having 3-4-5 non conference games.
I say kind of combine what the MWC is doing this year and possibly next season and what the AAC has always done for the past few years in non conference games. But make all conferences play 7 not 8 or 9 conference games and all play two A4 teams from two different A4 conferences and only the G5/6 get to play FCS schools and all done by first weekend in October against FCS teams and nothing but FBS teams for rest of the season. No division play but pods possible and A4 schools have to play at least 2 A4 teams in non conference games and two to three Non Autonomy schools in non conference games.
The Non Autonomy get two A4 teams minimum and two Non Autonomy schools minimum and only one FCS school in non conference games if the Non Autonomy teams want to schedule a FCS team to play. This would make at least the Conferences somewhat competitive equally and would make analysis easier for which teams and which conferences are stronger and better than others and deserve and earn a playoff spot or certain conferences getting multiple teams in the playoffs as would eliminate the subjective opinion and conjecture and actually have objective measurements and results to go by. But this makes too much sense and maybe too much money and intrigue evenly distributed among all D1 teams and therefore would not happen because it would solve the bickering.
Just say you don't like acc dude
Define "don't like" and also why I wouldn't like them
So how many teams is sec getting in 10 gtfoh you bias you haven't seen anybody else play
My guess is the SEC gets in 4
SEC gets 4, B1G get 4, G5 gets 1, ACC and Big12 (combined) get the last 3. Unless Notre Dame gets the last spot. That's just based on last season's records and the P2 clearly having more top teams.