It is important to put into perspective that India had been a continuous thriving civilization for atleast the past 10,000 years. It was just in the last 1000 years that we started to fight among ourselves which allowed the external forces to take control. We won way more than we ever lost.
External forces didn't took control because of our internal fig'hting. Where are the Zoroastrians of Iran?? Natives of America ?? Aboriginals of Australia?? Māoris of New Zealand?? They were also att'acked because of their internal conflict?? Those who att'acked themselves had internal conflict (Europeans ) Catholic / Protestant / Eastern Orthodox & many more Isl'am Shia / Sunni / Ahmediyya & 70 more We didn't att'acked them because of their internal conflict.
that's not correct! we had our internal fights Guptas and Mauryas and Cholas all expanding their kingdoms that came with wars. Ashok's kalinga war is famous and lot more this all happened before 1000 AD. Even to if u belief Mahabharat is just an Epic and not real history yet it does depict war between kingdoms to be a very common things in ancient india. It doesnt take anything away from our glorious history but it is wrong to turn a blind eye towards our faults.
@@jigneshsolanki4536 but still during mauryans, Gupta's, cholas no one even dared to attack India. We know what happened with Alexander although they somehow managed to win but had faced a heavy loss so much so that the army had lost its moral and they went back and guess what porus was not even a king of some great rich Dynasty but like a local warlord whereas nandas were much more powerful than porus. Similarly the selucas got defeated numerous times by mauryans, during Gupta's india saw growth in culture, architecture, statecraft etc . Similarly cholas were one among the few dynasties who had large navy and conquered almost entire south east Asia. Problems started when Mohammad ghori came into the scene and people like jaichand took birth in this land
Basically divide and rule was their policy. India not having a central organised power but rather divided several local princely powers fighting among themselves was the problem which the british intervened and worsened and took advantage of.
The real difference was the Universities that came up in Europe. Cambridge and Oxford. The intellectuals contributed in all fields including in warfare. Braitain's rise as a power is directly linked to the Universities that cropped up there. America's rise also corresponds to the Universities. India was once a great power because of Nalanda and Taxashila Universities in India which were the best at that time. Universities act as the back office of powerful dynasties. India should concentrate on building world class Universities if it has to regain it's place as a world power.
@@vs9324 😐👍 #Mu$lims were very powerful between 10th -16th century. Which #UNIVERSITY they had ?? Infact they became powerful by dest'roying universities. ( Takshashila / Nalanda) 😐
@@ujjawalkashyap3531 They expanded by invading lands in taking advantage of their opponents weaknesses. In India, it was multiple power centres in terms of small kingdoms and the rivalry between them. If Indians would have been united Mughals would never have been able to defeat us although it is also a fact that mughals were defeated many times by Marathas, Rajputs and Sikhs.
@@vs9324 #Mu$lims were also & still are div'ided in shia / sunni / Ahmadiyya & 70 more sects. #Europeans were also & still are div'ided in Catholic / Protestant / Eastern Orthodox & many more sects. Even #Atheists are Some are Marxist Some are Maoists Some call themselves Darwanian Atheists. Why we didn't att'acked them ?? Why didn't we took advantage of their internal co'nflict?? #Isl'am div'ides humanity in Momin & k'afir #Chr'istianity di'vides humanity in Believer's & in'fidels. This was the reason why they att'acked not only us but everyone else ( Natives of America / Aboriginals of Australia / Maoris of New Zealand / Zoroastrians of Iran) who didn't bel'ieved in their ideology. Not because of our internal co'nflict.
Rick said a very good point that "west always wants to enlighten the east" they have their own morale and trying generalize in the world, which is absolutely unjust stupid thing to do. today in the name of liberalism, the west does the same thing called "enlighten" to the east.
Each civilisation will attempt to do that. If history were different do you think the East would not try to impose itself on the West? The Middle East is definitely trying to impose itself on everything, as is China.
Before watching this video, I hope there is mention of Anglo - Maratha battles pre 1857. Otherwise, such videos just try to show us Indians were fools. Battle of Wadgaon Battle of Laswari Battle of Assaye Battle of Delhi Battle of Maharajapura & Punniar Coastal battles of Angres Assaye was hailed by Duke of Wellington as the fiercest battle ever, even ranking it above Napolean war. The British even mu*dered 21 year old Kolhapur Chhatrapati Shivaji IV by 'Boot and the spleen' technique. Not mentioning these battles make it look like India handed over control of this country without a fight. It is a great disrespect to all those sacrifices. Freedom fighters took inspiration from Chhatrapati Shivaji's struggle. Chhatrapati Shivaji was already skeptical about intentions of the Europeans. It is well documented in Adnyapatra.
Irony is most people think that #Brit's took India from #Mughals 🤷♂️ #HINDU MARATHAS defeated MUGHALS in 27 YEAR'S long war(1681 to 1707) LIST OF SOME BATTLE'S won by HINDU MARATHAS 🚩BATTLE OF PRATAPGAD (1659)vs AFZAL KHAN 🚩BATTLE OF KOLHAPUR(1659) 🚩BATTLE OF PAVAN KHIND(1660) 🚩 BATTLE OF UMBERKHIND(1661) 🚩 BATTLE OF SURAT(1664) 🚩 BATTLE OF SINHAGAD or KONDHANA(1670) TANHAJI 🚩 BATTLE OF SALHER (1672) MUGHALS lost in open field & lost 1 year later in DINDORI. 🚩 BATTLE OF VIKRAMGAD(1672) 🚩 BATTLE OF PALKHED (1728) vs NIZAM 🚩BATTLE OF AHMEDABAD 1732 (Sarsenapati Umabaisaheb Khanderao Dabhade) defeated Mughal Sardar Joravar Khan Babi. 🚩1st BATTLE OF DELHI(1737) -WON 🚩 BATTLE of BHOPAL(1737) 🚩2nd BATTLE OF DELHI (1757) 🚩 BATTLE OF UDGIR (1760) 🚩 BATTLE OF PESHAWAR (1758) vs DURRANI Empire 👉 BATTLE OF ATTOCK vs DURRANI(1758) 👉 BATTLE of NARELA (1757)vs AFGHANI AHMED SHAH ABDALI ❎❎❎ AFTER 1761 🚩 BATTLE OF RAKSHASBHUVAN (1763) REVENGE of PANIPAT 1761 & ALEGAON 1762 🚩 BATTLE OF RUTEHALLI FORT - DEFEATED HYDER ALI(1764) 👉 BATTLE OF SIRA and MADGIRI-(1767)- DEFEATED THE FORCES of HYDER ALI at SIRA AND MADGIRI 🚩-BATTLE OF GOVARDHAN - MATHURA (TEMPLE) 🔔1770 🚩 MARATHAS CAPTURED DELHI (1771) DEFEATED AFGHANS ( regained their lost supremacy) 🚩1772 MARATHAS DEFEATED ROHILLA CHIEFTAIN ZABITA KHAN, REVENGE of PANIPAT 👉 BATTLE of GAJENDRAGAD (1786) -MARATHAS DEFEATED TIPU SULTAN 🚩 BATTLE OF KHARDA (1795) vs TIPU SULTAN & NIZAM 🚩👮♂️ BATTLE OF VASAI (1739) DEFEATED PORTUGUESE 🚩👮♂️ BATTLE OF WADGAON/First ANGLO MARATHA war (1779) - DEFEATED BRITISH
I was crying watching the last few minutes of this video man Now it has become my dream to go there Being an Indian , I myself got to know about many beautiful places of my country because of you guys reacts to a certain video, Thankyu for that OSR ❤❤
One of the reasons it made it easy for Europe to colonize India, they were divided as a nation. Indians were many and their colonizers were few, they could have stood together united to easily defend India and defeat them.
lack of agression and warfare was main reason then and somewhat now also ,indians must realize millitary might and bravery work ,chanting peace and waiting to get attacked only defend will again lead to similar trap
well made video, as explained colonisation is attributed to multiple factors within or outside India's control - rise of smaller empires which divided India post mughals, rise of European trade, education, corruption, geography, administrative loopholes, no incentive to invest in technology (navy, military) bc we were self sufficient and didn't need to discover and conquer far away lands etc
Here are some historical beats around Bridge Scene of RRR: 1. ruclips.net/video/NHc-VSIyhBc/видео.html Ram's Entry Scene of RRR: 2. ruclips.net/video/4iEiY91SS2E/видео.html
Even British didnt attack about 500 princely independent states in this region, when British left India 'attacked' those to annex. So u cant blame only British to use 'force' lol.
British weren't the first European power to establish dominance over large portion of South Asia. About 2000 years prior to them, Greeks under Alexander had reached upto Punjab, eventhough he couldn't venture forward. His successors although, ruled large chunks of India for upto 300 years. Most notable of them was Meanander(Sanskrit: Milind) who was loved by his subjects. The difference between Greeks and British was that, Greeks actually settled and mixed with Indians, adopted the religion and spoke the language. Like Indo-Greeks were really a thing. But British, just looted and went. No cultural exchange of any sort(other than butter chicken lol)
Correction: Not 'large chunks'. Parts of present day Pakistan-Afghanistan. The rule was established not by military force but through marriage alliances. The first one being Alexander's military successor Seleucus marrying his daughter to Chandragupta Maurya in exchange of war elephants. The Greeks had realised they can't fight the Mauryas and hence decided the softer ways of diplomatic relations.
@@essee3984 You have confused Seleucid Empire with Indo-Greek Empire. Indo-Greeks did rule large chunks of India, upto Pataliputra(Patna) in East and Gujarat in South, through satraps(Northern, Western and Eastern satraps) You are right, Greeks established relations through marriage alliances. They really wanted to stay, not just loot and go away They were succeeded by Scythians, who too were a white race, albeit not from Europe. Then by the Yuezhi Kushans, who too were Asian white people
Greeks didn't really "mixed" with Indians, yes there was art hydridisation & creation, but that was about it. There wasn't any genetic impact of Greeks on ancient India
@@Bridge_2702 Rightly put. Greeks and Scynthian had control over some territories for a couple of centuries but that's a very small timeframe for genetic assimilation. The same way we don't see any genetic mixture or assimilation after 200 years of British rule.
Also, India was already busy fighting the Islamic invaders and soon after Chatrapati Shivaji died there was no worthy successor who could fight the Britts who had much advanced guns and weapons. India fell to the Britts bit by bit.
The factor that made Europe more sinister compared to the previous conquerors is that the previous conquerors mingled with Indians and became one (after the initial looting as a result of war). But Europe did not and instead, they took everything out to their home.
Those who mingled again had 2 reasons for that. 1) Lack of large ships like the british had. There was only so much you could carry on horseback. 2) Those people didn't have any kingdom back home to take the loot to. They were driven away from back home and going back would've been dangerous. (Babar had lost final Battle of Samarkand back home then came to india)
@@rhonaldjr keyboard warrior? What did I fight you with about? I just asked a simple question about your claim. And you failed to answer while diverting the topic and attacking me personally 🤦
I’d love it if you guys did a video of your top ten favorite songs, either tamil or hindi or both. A list of the ten songs that you guys personally enjoy listening to, that you have in your playlist etc
There is a very subtle or very noticeable western thought on that video rather than an objetive look at colonialisation. For eg. He talks about the battles between Indian kingdoms and the incoming European companies/capitalists as same. Indian armies and royals always followed rules of war etiquette. They will always choose a date time and place away from civilization and during day etc and always a mark of excellence and showcase of bravery. Even poets sat along sidelines to compose poems to record such battles as history. Europeans however had no qualms to bomb and ravage civilian homes and cities where families live and thrive. It is something absolutely vile in world history that the europeans exported everywhere. They will taste their own medicine during the world wars but they have not learned from this.
You talk a lot of shyte. This mythologising of Indian culture and demonisation of western culture is a pathology that holds you back because you cannot seem to accept the realities of history of your own failings. Grow up.
There was no India at those days. The Portuguese conquered Goa , Daman and Diu from the Sultanate of Gujarat , the Hindus have been prosecuting the peoples of other ethnicities and religion to form India and they still are. In 1500 Russia was the size o Belgium and has been growing since than and still is , China has also been growing and is now trying to get territories from the Indians and Russians themselves. Mahatma Gandhi and the Hindus are very far away from the nice peaceful people that the leftist media likes to paint them like.
You have done a good job.. The year was 1453 - The fall of Constantinople to Islamic powers with some support from the Rome/Venice is the key... Note that the Genoa is on west side of Italy and the Italians never bothered "the Merchant of Venice is more than a case study. why didn't the Romans or Venice do it? and why was it the poor Portuguese?... How did they chose to first to land in Kerala and not in Somalia, Muscat, Persia,, Karachi, Goa, Gujrat,, Sri Lanka, Chennai, Odisha, Bengal, Jakarta, Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Vietnam, China, Japan,?.. More answers yet to be discovered.. keep going... :), BTW I am from Kerala. :)
Odd Compass is a really good channel and it’s very very under subscribed…. I’m a fan of odd compass channel and thank you for reacting to their video and hope you guys react to more of their videos
@@coolgoose4966Because of People like you these racist people were ruling us for 200 years. For idiots who never read whole book in his entire life everything is propaganda.
It is important to put into perspective that India had been a continuous thriving civilization for atleast the past 10,000 years. It was just in the last 1000 years that we started to fight among ourselves which allowed the external forces to take control. We won way more than we ever lost.
Well said
External forces didn't took control because of our internal fig'hting.
Where are the Zoroastrians of Iran??
Natives of America ??
Aboriginals of Australia??
Māoris of New Zealand??
They were also att'acked because of their internal conflict??
Those who att'acked themselves had internal conflict
(Europeans )
Catholic / Protestant / Eastern Orthodox & many more
Isl'am
Shia / Sunni / Ahmediyya & 70 more
We didn't att'acked them because of their internal conflict.
that's not correct! we had our internal fights Guptas and Mauryas and Cholas all expanding their kingdoms that came with wars. Ashok's kalinga war is famous and lot more this all happened before 1000 AD. Even to if u belief Mahabharat is just an Epic and not real history yet it does depict war between kingdoms to be a very common things in ancient india. It doesnt take anything away from our glorious history but it is wrong to turn a blind eye towards our faults.
@@ujjawalkashyap3531 We moved to conquer South East Asia, Thailand, Majahaput etc., when China made Silk Road.
@@jigneshsolanki4536 but still during mauryans, Gupta's, cholas no one even dared to attack India. We know what happened with Alexander although they somehow managed to win but had faced a heavy loss so much so that the army had lost its moral and they went back and guess what porus was not even a king of some great rich Dynasty but like a local warlord whereas nandas were much more powerful than porus. Similarly the selucas got defeated numerous times by mauryans, during Gupta's india saw growth in culture, architecture, statecraft etc . Similarly cholas were one among the few dynasties who had large navy and conquered almost entire south east Asia. Problems started when Mohammad ghori came into the scene and people like jaichand took birth in this land
Basically divide and rule was their policy. India not having a central organised power but rather divided several local princely powers fighting among themselves was the problem which the british intervened and worsened and took advantage of.
The real difference was the Universities that came up in Europe. Cambridge and Oxford. The intellectuals contributed in all fields including in warfare. Braitain's rise as a power is directly linked to the Universities that cropped up there. America's rise also corresponds to the Universities. India was once a great power because of Nalanda and Taxashila Universities in India which were the best at that time. Universities act as the back office of powerful dynasties. India should concentrate on building world class Universities if it has to regain it's place as a world power.
Listen to #Rajiv Malhotra about #Harvard University atleast once.
@@ujjawalkashyap3531 I would have if i would have considered Rajiv Malhotra an intellectual.
@@vs9324
😐👍
#Mu$lims were very powerful between 10th -16th century.
Which #UNIVERSITY they had ??
Infact they became powerful by dest'roying universities. ( Takshashila / Nalanda) 😐
@@ujjawalkashyap3531 They expanded by invading lands in taking advantage of their opponents weaknesses. In India, it was multiple power centres in terms of small kingdoms and the rivalry between them. If Indians would have been united Mughals would never have been able to defeat us although it is also a fact that mughals were defeated many times by Marathas, Rajputs and Sikhs.
@@vs9324
#Mu$lims were also & still are div'ided in shia / sunni / Ahmadiyya & 70 more sects.
#Europeans were also & still are div'ided in Catholic / Protestant / Eastern Orthodox & many more sects.
Even #Atheists are
Some are Marxist
Some are Maoists
Some call themselves Darwanian Atheists.
Why we didn't att'acked them ??
Why didn't we took advantage of their internal co'nflict??
#Isl'am div'ides humanity in Momin & k'afir
#Chr'istianity di'vides humanity in Believer's & in'fidels.
This was the reason why they att'acked not only us but everyone else ( Natives of America / Aboriginals of Australia / Maoris of New Zealand / Zoroastrians of Iran)
who didn't bel'ieved in their ideology.
Not because of our internal co'nflict.
Rick said a very good point that "west always wants to enlighten the east" they have their own morale and trying generalize in the world, which is absolutely unjust stupid thing to do. today in the name of liberalism, the west does the same thing called "enlighten" to the east.
Each civilisation will attempt to do that. If history were different do you think the East would not try to impose itself on the West? The Middle East is definitely trying to impose itself on everything, as is China.
I hope to see the Economic situation and Culture of each State in India reach their past prime... I want to see it happen in my lifetime 🧘♂️
avunu.
❤
Each state? Would you like to see India broken up into mini kingdoms again? You’re big enough after all.
@mogznwaz You must have a tiny brain to comprehend my comment to turn it into controversy.... Grow up kid 🙄😂
Before watching this video, I hope there is mention of Anglo - Maratha battles pre 1857. Otherwise, such videos just try to show us Indians were fools.
Battle of Wadgaon
Battle of Laswari
Battle of Assaye
Battle of Delhi
Battle of Maharajapura & Punniar
Coastal battles of Angres
Assaye was hailed by Duke of Wellington as the fiercest battle ever, even ranking it above Napolean war.
The British even mu*dered 21 year old Kolhapur Chhatrapati Shivaji IV by 'Boot and the spleen' technique.
Not mentioning these battles make it look like India handed over control of this country without a fight. It is a great disrespect to all those sacrifices.
Freedom fighters took inspiration from Chhatrapati Shivaji's struggle. Chhatrapati Shivaji was already skeptical about intentions of the Europeans. It is well documented in Adnyapatra.
Irony is most people think that #Brit's took India from #Mughals 🤷♂️
#HINDU MARATHAS defeated MUGHALS in 27 YEAR'S long war(1681 to 1707)
LIST OF SOME BATTLE'S won by HINDU MARATHAS
🚩BATTLE OF PRATAPGAD (1659)vs AFZAL KHAN
🚩BATTLE OF KOLHAPUR(1659)
🚩BATTLE OF PAVAN KHIND(1660)
🚩 BATTLE OF UMBERKHIND(1661)
🚩 BATTLE OF SURAT(1664)
🚩 BATTLE OF SINHAGAD or KONDHANA(1670) TANHAJI
🚩 BATTLE OF SALHER (1672) MUGHALS lost in open field & lost 1 year later in DINDORI.
🚩 BATTLE OF VIKRAMGAD(1672)
🚩 BATTLE OF PALKHED (1728) vs NIZAM
🚩BATTLE OF AHMEDABAD 1732 (Sarsenapati Umabaisaheb Khanderao Dabhade) defeated Mughal Sardar Joravar Khan Babi.
🚩1st BATTLE OF DELHI(1737) -WON
🚩 BATTLE of BHOPAL(1737)
🚩2nd BATTLE OF DELHI (1757)
🚩 BATTLE OF UDGIR (1760)
🚩 BATTLE OF PESHAWAR (1758) vs DURRANI Empire
👉 BATTLE OF ATTOCK vs DURRANI(1758)
👉 BATTLE of NARELA (1757)vs AFGHANI AHMED SHAH ABDALI
❎❎❎
AFTER 1761
🚩 BATTLE OF RAKSHASBHUVAN (1763) REVENGE of PANIPAT 1761 & ALEGAON 1762
🚩 BATTLE OF RUTEHALLI FORT - DEFEATED HYDER ALI(1764)
👉 BATTLE OF SIRA and MADGIRI-(1767)- DEFEATED THE FORCES of HYDER ALI at SIRA AND MADGIRI
🚩-BATTLE OF GOVARDHAN - MATHURA (TEMPLE) 🔔1770
🚩 MARATHAS CAPTURED DELHI (1771) DEFEATED AFGHANS ( regained their lost supremacy)
🚩1772 MARATHAS DEFEATED ROHILLA CHIEFTAIN ZABITA KHAN, REVENGE of PANIPAT
👉 BATTLE of GAJENDRAGAD (1786) -MARATHAS DEFEATED TIPU SULTAN
🚩 BATTLE OF KHARDA (1795) vs TIPU SULTAN & NIZAM
🚩👮♂️ BATTLE OF VASAI (1739) DEFEATED PORTUGUESE
🚩👮♂️ BATTLE OF WADGAON/First ANGLO MARATHA war (1779) - DEFEATED BRITISH
Exactly my thoughts. The video just scratches the surface.
I was crying watching the last few minutes of this video man
Now it has become my dream to go there
Being an Indian , I myself got to know about many beautiful places of my country because of you guys reacts to a certain video, Thankyu for that OSR ❤❤
One of the reasons it made it easy for Europe to colonize India, they were divided as a nation. Indians were many and their colonizers were few, they could have stood together united to easily defend India and defeat them.
But they didn’t. They had been too busy fighting each other and the invading Mughals. That is just reality.
Watch Chengiz Teaser Trailer starting Jeet, Rohit Roy, Shatal Figar and Susmita Chatterjee release date 21st April 2023
lack of agression and warfare was main reason then and somewhat now also ,indians must realize millitary might and bravery work ,chanting peace and waiting to get attacked only defend will again lead to similar trap
INDIAN HAVE FOUGHT FOR 1000 OF YEARS AND STILL AGAINST PAK CHINA ..WE DIDN'T GET FREEDOM FROM GANDHI CHARKHA
Or you can establish trade? Like Chandragupt did when Alexander came. Or like Tamils traded spices with empires to remain unconquered.
They didn't cover the drains of wealth theory, which was the main reason for britain to flourish.
I love you India ❤
well made video, as explained colonisation is attributed to multiple factors within or outside India's control - rise of smaller empires which divided India post mughals, rise of European trade, education, corruption, geography, administrative loopholes, no incentive to invest in technology (navy, military) bc we were self sufficient and didn't need to discover and conquer far away lands etc
This deserves so many more views!
Here are some historical beats around
Bridge Scene of RRR:
1. ruclips.net/video/NHc-VSIyhBc/видео.html
Ram's Entry Scene of RRR:
2. ruclips.net/video/4iEiY91SS2E/видео.html
What if India Change the Policy ( Do not Attack first) and Start Attacking First Then there will be Only Sanatan Dharma #AkhandBharat🇮🇳
Even British didnt attack about 500 princely independent states in this region, when British left India 'attacked' those to annex. So u cant blame only British to use 'force' lol.
Which independent state was attacked to annex?
@@milindshinde9141
#Razakars of Hyderabad.
Wahi 15 minute ke liye police hatado wala.
Avi tak Dimag mein Mughal aur Nizam hai inke.
states willingly merged not attacked ,stop propganda ,
if Indians had 1% of the self awareness and self criticism that Rick and Korbin show here we would've been prosperous country by now
India is also getting divided everyday. So is UK. There are problems everywhere Rick.
British weren't the first European power to establish dominance over large portion of South Asia. About 2000 years prior to them, Greeks under Alexander had reached upto Punjab, eventhough he couldn't venture forward. His successors although, ruled large chunks of India for upto 300 years. Most notable of them was Meanander(Sanskrit: Milind) who was loved by his subjects.
The difference between Greeks and British was that, Greeks actually settled and mixed with Indians, adopted the religion and spoke the language. Like Indo-Greeks were really a thing. But British, just looted and went. No cultural exchange of any sort(other than butter chicken lol)
Correction: Not 'large chunks'. Parts of present day Pakistan-Afghanistan. The rule was established not by military force but through marriage alliances. The first one being Alexander's military successor Seleucus marrying his daughter to Chandragupta Maurya in exchange of war elephants. The Greeks had realised they can't fight the Mauryas and hence decided the softer ways of diplomatic relations.
@@essee3984 You have confused Seleucid Empire with Indo-Greek Empire. Indo-Greeks did rule large chunks of India, upto Pataliputra(Patna) in East and Gujarat in South, through satraps(Northern, Western and Eastern satraps)
You are right, Greeks established relations through marriage alliances. They really wanted to stay, not just loot and go away
They were succeeded by Scythians, who too were a white race, albeit not from Europe. Then by the Yuezhi Kushans, who too were Asian white people
Greeks didn't really "mixed" with Indians, yes there was art hydridisation & creation, but that was about it. There wasn't any genetic impact of Greeks on ancient India
@@Bridge_2702 Rightly put. Greeks and Scynthian had control over some territories for a couple of centuries but that's a very small timeframe for genetic assimilation. The same way we don't see any genetic mixture or assimilation after 200 years of British rule.
@@essee3984 Scythians might be different, it seems they did have some genetic impact. Agree with Greeks though, they didn't have any genetic impact.
Also, India was already busy fighting the Islamic invaders and soon after Chatrapati Shivaji died there was no worthy successor who could fight the Britts who had much advanced guns and weapons. India fell to the Britts bit by bit.
The factor that made Europe more sinister compared to the previous conquerors is that the previous conquerors mingled with Indians and became one (after the initial looting as a result of war). But Europe did not and instead, they took everything out to their home.
wtf who exactly are these previous conquerors you're referring to who mingled with Indians and became one? 🙄
Those who mingled again had 2 reasons for that.
1) Lack of large ships like the british had. There was only so much you could carry on horseback.
2) Those people didn't have any kingdom back home to take the loot to. They were driven away from back home and going back would've been dangerous. (Babar had lost final Battle of Samarkand back home then came to india)
@@onlytolearn keyboard warrior strikes. I suggest reading history books.
@@rhonaldjr keyboard warrior? What did I fight you with about? I just asked a simple question about your claim. And you failed to answer while diverting the topic and attacking me personally 🤦
@@onlytolearn Shak kushan indo Greek . Mughal and British were same
I’d love it if you guys did a video of your top ten favorite songs, either tamil or hindi or both. A list of the ten songs that you guys personally enjoy listening to, that you have in your playlist etc
There is a very subtle or very noticeable western thought on that video rather than an objetive look at colonialisation.
For eg. He talks about the battles between Indian kingdoms and the incoming European companies/capitalists as same. Indian armies and royals always followed rules of war etiquette. They will always choose a date time and place away from civilization and during day etc and always a mark of excellence and showcase of bravery. Even poets sat along sidelines to compose poems to record such battles as history.
Europeans however had no qualms to bomb and ravage civilian homes and cities where families live and thrive. It is something absolutely vile in world history that the europeans exported everywhere. They will taste their own medicine during the world wars but they have not learned from this.
You talk a lot of shyte. This mythologising of Indian culture and demonisation of western culture is a pathology that holds you back because you cannot seem to accept the realities of history of your own failings. Grow up.
Jai Shri Ram 🕉️🙏
🙏
Hi rick korbin, Its been 3 years since you guys visited india❤️
Korbin have toddlers to look after , that's why
There was no India at those days.
The Portuguese conquered Goa , Daman and Diu from the Sultanate of Gujarat , the Hindus have been prosecuting the peoples of other ethnicities and religion to form India and they still are.
In 1500 Russia was the size o Belgium and has been growing since than and still is , China has also been growing and is now trying to get territories from the Indians and Russians themselves.
Mahatma Gandhi and the Hindus are very far away from the nice peaceful people that the leftist media likes to paint them like.
You guys need to watch-
Sahebs who never left | History of subversion of India | Prachyam
You have done a good job.. The year was 1453 - The fall of Constantinople to Islamic powers with some support from the Rome/Venice is the key... Note that the Genoa is on west side of Italy and the Italians never bothered "the Merchant of Venice is more than a case study. why didn't the Romans or Venice do it? and why was it the poor Portuguese?... How did they chose to first to land in Kerala and not in Somalia, Muscat, Persia,, Karachi, Goa, Gujrat,, Sri Lanka, Chennai, Odisha, Bengal, Jakarta, Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Vietnam, China, Japan,?.. More answers yet to be discovered.. keep going... :), BTW I am from Kerala. :)
Odd Compass is a really good channel and it’s very very under subscribed…. I’m a fan of odd compass channel and thank you for reacting to their video and hope you guys react to more of their videos
They feared moghals
Why you guys always react to white person video to learn about indian history??
Bcoz Chavda & other paid ideologically oriented desi channels are cringe. Cope.
@@Bridge_2702 apne baap ko bhi cringe bolte ho?? Don't behave like brown coolie
@@Ashutosh5897 cope
watch the paid propaganda indian channels ?? like Repúblic and those type of crap?
@@coolgoose4966Because of People like you these racist people were ruling us for 200 years. For idiots who never read whole book in his entire life everything is propaganda.
The reverse is happening now.
By pre partition india we mean whole South asian subcontinent just to mention this point thanks.
Please See the video Of silence of swastika documentary
Deeply biased and nuanced propaganda video, all mistakes and stupidity of empire including genocides were very cleverly masked, col todd type
Yes they blame Europe and cannot wait to live in Europe
I don't think the video is about blaming Europe at all, more like how Europe rose & became technologically advanced.
makes me wonder how i$l@mists hate western culture but cant wait to move to those countries
Please give Reaction Video on Marathi Movie Trailer Ghar Banduk Biryani
This is a Special Request..
Half baked video...
Maurya Empire 🙏🚩
It is showing distorted map of india
Please react on mujhe naulakha manga de re song
React to moongil kadukale from samurai movie
❤❤❤
Nice video
Kindly react to music of ananda shankar.....i remember
Jorthale song reaction
Plz react barsat ke din aye priyanka chorpa and Bobby deol
Rudran movie song
I think it's high time you had done a high voltage dance number
My recommendation : laila oo laila from naayak starring RAMCHARAN
The creator of this video is obviously biased by European perspectives.
Thalpathi Vijay Anna journey review please find 🙏🎥
The great mugal empire 🔥
yes great oppressors who imposed their culture on us in such a scale that it's repercussions are felt today tenfolds in the region😒