Nikon for the win, better colors, better lenses, better ergonomics, better pricing, better features, better built, great AF now, etc etc :) Sony has many issues starting with releasing way too many cameras way too soon. IMO.
Colors are, subjective. I had canon (will have again) and a z6. Af is stil canon or Sony. Neither z9/8 or the new z6III has the af of any recent canon camera . Built, dunno both are good there. Handling is also subjective, but i would pick Canon for that (they have 3 command dials + 1 on many lenses, means you have for everything a dial (shutter,apperture,iso, without pressing a button). Both have amazing lenses and both are pretty expensive glass wise. Neither is Leica, except af it would win mostly. Fuji has amazing lenses, Pentax has dslrs and OM has cute, little workhorse cameras. Panasonic with s5 is also a great camera, with a building up lense collection (from Leica too).
@@georgelpons True true. I mean, like I said at the end of my message, in my opinion :), ... there is no need for you guys to get so offended and angry and worked up over that. Also, I don't do sports, so I don't need "perfect" AF to take photos, the ZF/Z8/Z9/Z6II/Z6II etc are all more than enough for 95% of case studies, so we need to stop listening to those dumb arguments and AF tests by people like The Fro and others, nobody is jumping around, ducking, and moving erratically for a photo... there are many things you take photos of too, architecture etc, AF won't save us if we are bad at composition, creativity, lighting etc. Fuji and others have way worse AF than all Nikon cameras yet I don't see people complaining about them, we need to put a rest to the AF thing when it comes to Nikon, they have pretty much fixed it and will keep improving it... If anything, that's all Sony and Canon have over Nikon, very marginally better AF.
@@felm.974 I find in street, situations where the nikon, does the same as fuji. Saying it has focus and then you look at the picture and see that it focused a bit further away or closer than the spot (its not always and as its a dslm, it is not a defocus problem) you put to focus. I am not really offended, i say only, that all camera producers make good cameras, so that the handling and what you prefer therefore, is the deciding factor, for the camera you take. You can make great pictures with any camera on the market. I have a fuji (xt4) and a nikon (own a z6 used a z8), the af is not that far apart of each other. As said both say few times, that they got the af, when it hasnt and yes i like both enough, that i like both of them and use them. But to say nikon has the best af (or better than canon), is a bit far fetched. Canon and Sony have very similar af and nikon and fuji are a bit away from those two. So that i would prefer, when i shoot birds or moving cars etc. a canon. Because then i am sure that it got the focus, when it says it has it, always and not 90% of the time. When you disregard handling, there would be no way around medium format, for landscape and even architecture. Nothing can beat a bigger sensor.
All pro cameras are pretty much comparable right now. Differences are extremely minor and hardly dealbreakers. If you’re on a system, there’s really no reason to swap.
But to be honest I don't I could ever leave Canon. Unless they really did something stupid. Sony bodies are too small for me and the look out of the camera is not it, especially when you do events you can't sit and edit each photo for 5 minutes. You'll never finish. Maybe Sony is good for fair skin, but us dark and chocolate skin. Canon is the only real option. Lenses/ batteries are also what will stop someone.
![GUILTY GEAR -STRIVE- Season Pass 4 Playable Character #1 [Queen Dizzy] Trailer](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nXDsAgYXXv4/mqdefault.jpg)
Just throwing this out there. You can adapt Sony and Canon EF lenses to the Nikon Z system. Rent a Z6iii or Z8 for a week and see what you think.
This is a question I have no answer to lol.
I also have access to the z8 and z9 but I haven't found myself excited to use any of them
Nikon for the win, better colors, better lenses, better ergonomics, better pricing, better features, better built, great AF now, etc etc :) Sony has many issues starting with releasing way too many cameras way too soon. IMO.
Here we go with the colors talk
@@PrinceMeyson Yep, Nikon is known for their great colors :)
Colors are, subjective. I had canon (will have again) and a z6. Af is stil canon or Sony. Neither z9/8 or the new z6III has the af of any recent canon camera . Built, dunno both are good there. Handling is also subjective, but i would pick Canon for that (they have 3 command dials + 1 on many lenses, means you have for everything a dial (shutter,apperture,iso, without pressing a button).
Both have amazing lenses and both are pretty expensive glass wise.
Neither is Leica, except af it would win mostly. Fuji has amazing lenses, Pentax has dslrs and OM has cute, little workhorse cameras. Panasonic with s5 is also a great camera, with a building up lense collection (from Leica too).
@@georgelpons True true. I mean, like I said at the end of my message, in my opinion :), ... there is no need for you guys to get so offended and angry and worked up over that.
Also, I don't do sports, so I don't need "perfect" AF to take photos, the ZF/Z8/Z9/Z6II/Z6II etc are all more than enough for 95% of case studies, so we need to stop listening to those dumb arguments and AF tests by people like The Fro and others, nobody is jumping around, ducking, and moving erratically for a photo... there are many things you take photos of too, architecture etc, AF won't save us if we are bad at composition, creativity, lighting etc. Fuji and others have way worse AF than all Nikon cameras yet I don't see people complaining about them, we need to put a rest to the AF thing when it comes to Nikon, they have pretty much fixed it and will keep improving it... If anything, that's all Sony and Canon have over Nikon, very marginally better AF.
@@felm.974 I find in street, situations where the nikon, does the same as fuji. Saying it has focus and then you look at the picture and see that it focused a bit further away or closer than the spot (its not always and as its a dslm, it is not a defocus problem) you put to focus. I am not really offended, i say only, that all camera producers make good cameras, so that the handling and what you prefer therefore, is the deciding factor, for the camera you take. You can make great pictures with any camera on the market. I have a fuji (xt4) and a nikon (own a z6 used a z8), the af is not that far apart of each other. As said both say few times, that they got the af, when it hasnt and yes i like both enough, that i like both of them and use them. But to say nikon has the best af (or better than canon), is a bit far fetched. Canon and Sony have very similar af and nikon and fuji are a bit away from those two. So that i would prefer, when i shoot birds or moving cars etc. a canon. Because then i am sure that it got the focus, when it says it has it, always and not 90% of the time.
When you disregard handling, there would be no way around medium format, for landscape and even architecture. Nothing can beat a bigger sensor.
All pro cameras are pretty much comparable right now. Differences are extremely minor and hardly dealbreakers. If you’re on a system, there’s really no reason to swap.
Short answer: my current camera gets the job done…
I have been following your journey since the beginning of this channel.And to my knowledge you've never owned Nikon, so I think you'll try Sony again.
I like to keep up with some trends and news just in case.
But to be honest I don't I could ever leave Canon. Unless they really did something stupid.
Sony bodies are too small for me and the look out of the camera is not it, especially when you do events you can't sit and edit each photo for 5 minutes. You'll never finish. Maybe Sony is good for fair skin, but us dark and chocolate skin. Canon is the only real option.
Lenses/ batteries are also what will stop someone.
Massa na why!
Canon go release R5 ii soon
they already released it
haha already
Im guessing Nikon because Taylor Jackson, went from canon to nikon
But i am not Taylor Jackson lol
@@PrinceMeyson 🤣
Short answer is he's not married to Canon but he's also not switching to anything that's not Canon. 😂😂😂
Lmao.
Rasta Meyson
Lmao! thats me!!
First too watch 🎉🎉🎉
Bless!