@@pinetworkminer8377 "better image quality" is subjective but I prefer Fuji's image. However a cleaner looking image is sony. A detailed image is going to be sony. Sony lenses are sharper than fuji lenses..Especially the gmasters. plus 33 mp is more than the 26mp so that will give you more detailed image resolution..
Right now Sony is the clear winner, new bodies that outclass competitors come and go, but good affordable AF glass at different focal ranges is hard to get on Fuji (and has been for a long time). Having said that Fuji makes incredible cameras for street photography and the video coming from the XH2 is incredible.....if Fuji get's more third party manufacturers to develop XF glass I will definitely give the edge to Fuji.
After owning both… I give it to the X-H2s is superior in all fronts for filmmakers even coming almost close to beat FX3, the only thing I can think anyone would be biased towards the A7iv is if you want Full frame but gotta deal with crops, bad battery life vs other Sonys. Ill take a better sensor all day X-H2s is king at the $2k range imo.
Great comparison… the only issue I have is with the low light comparison. The Fujifilm looks to have a higher exposure, which will make noise stand out more. Adjusting the Sony exposure to match the Fuji will reveal more noise. I’m actually really impressed with have the Fujifilm retains detail at higher ISO.
This seems interesting. The Hybrid Shooter's testing showed the X-H2S was darker than Sony by 2/3 stops at same ISO values, hence ISO 2500 on XH2S looked like ISO 1600 on Sony. Yours is kinda like the reverse. Potentially t-stop differences? I'm not sure.
@@Iamtongue Personally, I think for a true comparison, exposure and even depth of field should be matched. Same ISO number on each camera can result in different exposures. One can also get away with shooting a full stop wider on APS-C while maintaining the same DOF as FF, so that factors in as well.
@@Iamtongue Oh actually, maybe in future see if you can adapt some old EF glass instead. That would get rid of any potential T-stop differences. Maybe with a Sigma/Canon 50mm or something.
Some of the ISO comparisons shots had the A7iv in embedded preview... iirc it's a lower res preview and not the full details right? You gotta select all the images, go under Library > Previews > Build ... Previews.
Fuji has the 18mm and 27mm pancake lenses. Even their 35mm f1.4 is very small by comparison to most full frame lenses. Fuji has excellent image quality and once you put your photo into an editing program, the difference in final output would be indistinguishable.
What I find most interesting here is the highlight roll off. Notice @14:21 the light that is positioned to the right of the subject does not roll off in a natural way in the Sony image. It has a harsh blue border around it. Also notice the spill onto the desk. These nuances are what separates a OK image from a great image. The Fujifilm has a far superior image and much better image processing. Talking about noise, the FujiFilm has noise, sure, but none of the ugly confetti color noise that most cameras suffer from. The XH2S noise looks organic… film like. The Sony instead favors noise reduction, which crushes detail. It’s a clear win for the Fujifilm camera. Now if only Fujifilm would make a cinema variant, with removable EVF… just use the one from the GFX100 II, it’s excellent. Add a built in fan… built in eVND and internal BRaw… then we are off to the races.
For stills I would buy the Sony, but I would probably go with a used a7riv or a7iii instead of an a7iv. If I was interested in video, I would go with the Fuji. Both cameras are amazing though and can do anything.
@@Iamtongue Let’s hope. I think we both know that people who shoot fashion and intense street photography need the extra speed and I would love to have the better viewfinder also! These old eyes need some help! 🖖
@@Iamtongue I think that stacked sensor will find its way into another camera, but not where we think... Fujifilm cine camera with even more dynamic range, perhaps???
In my opinion, the comparison is not fair. I owned both, though, in video spec fujifilm wins, but in your colour comparison, my Sony look sharper and noise free in iso 2800. I don't know how you got that plastic colour for Sony in low light comparison.
I'm surprised by your results with the A7iv AF. I got a bunch of misses so I tested it on people running. Cloudy conditions, 70 200 GM2 at f2.8 or f3.2. Only 30% of the pics were properly focused while tracking worked fine. Besides, you should mention that 10 FPS is only possible with compressed with loss (or lower) format AND EVF refresh rate at 10 FPS with black out. You will most probably lose your subject.
@@martinruiz398 The optical quality of the 70-200 GM II is stunning. I have experienced it on static subjects. But the A7iv struggles for focusing on moving subjects.
around the 10 min mark I thought the fuji was just way sharper than the sony not actually more noise. The scratches and everything looked way sharper on the Fuji. What was NR set to?
AS a sony shooter i will say FUJI had it in the video AF test, and the noise at higher iso and how the image was rendering looked very very nice on the Fuji, maybe organic and has life compared to digital etc on the A7IV, I being old school actually prefer a little bit of texture, grit or grain in the image rather than just clean and bland... also the banding using LED on the A7IV, solved on the Fuji, but it also a non-issue on my A9II LOL. I would be happy to use files from the fuji at 12800 iso. Im very tempted to go back to Fuji now the XH2S has come along and the new line of LM fuji lenses. Great review 🙂
I disagree. Only that initial focus was Fuji faster. After that Sony was focused in immediately, while Fuji was not. And I’m a Fuji shooter. Not sure how much longer. I wanted Fuji to be better because I have then lenses, but it’s not.
@@JLStreetDoc i hear your pain.. had both the XH2 and XH2s on loan for two weeks, the XH2s is defo faster at acquiring focus than my A9ll and almost more sensitive in low light. stunning camera all be told. if it did not have that stupid flippy screen i would for sure have one, paired with the new line of lenses it was really a pleasure to use. XH2 was great image quality, and the way it rendered the images was 1st class, again the screen was an issue and wasn't keen on the dampened feeling shutter release compared to the 2s but as a combo, they would be fantastic... but the screen for me is a deal breaker, makes things off center for my dim wit brain when using waist level etc and de stabilizes the left of the camera to hold also gives a less discreet visual to the client when want to be invisible, XT5 well I've had xt1,2 and 3 and never liked the dials so don't think that is on the cards although it does have a tilt screen LOL. what i decided to do to shrink my sony gear, removed the grip from the A9ll and sold it, sold all my GM glass bar the 16-35 as need that for a client, purchased the Batis range of lenses now have a smaller setup and lenses with character, i was never a fan of the huge GM glass and its surgical, clinical sharpness. forgive my waffling on...LOL also sold my A7rIV and now to replace either with a A7IV or do i bite the bullet and get the XT5 and a 33mm f1.4.. ermmmm ??
@@karlbratby4349 it's fun see others give away what u want... I'm on a journey for the clinical sharpness and you already pass through this and don't want any more... But I'm struggling with the doubt, a7iv, the upcoming a7cii or xh2s - I love the colors on Fuji, but I do much jobs in low light situations and I have E-Mount glasses... Difficult choice...
@@Pontcher I ditched all my Sony gear now, went with an Xh2s and an XH2 and they are great, XH2s is almost on par high iso as my A9ll was and pair with the primes and shoot maybe 1 stop wider and its awesome, glass is amazing, 18, 23, 33 and new 56 are awesome. not over-keen on the flippy screen and still lack of glowing permanent AF point so at times it gets lost but I'm sure eventually they will add this.
Third party lenses for Fuji are rolling out with regularity now also. And they aren’t new lens designs… they are proven winners from solid manufacturers, with Sigma being a big deal for me personally (1.4 trio, 18-50 f2.8).
You should look at it using Capture One. With my X-H2S I found the raw conversion was not sharp at all. I haven't done noise tests of the two programs yet.
I hear capture one is better processing Fuji raws.. but LR has ai features like masking and what nots to make it easier on my workflow. I tried c1 for a week and I was not comfortable with the workflow
Great comparison video. The ISO button can now be bypassed all together, you can assign directly a d pad buttons up/down or dial wheel no need to even touch that annoying top iso button 👍
The autofocus problem in the xh2s video caused by the mechanics in fuji lenses, Try using some of fuji newer lenses like the 33mm it's so much better in autofocus and never stutter
If I could afford either of these, I'd probably go for the Fuji for video specs and good enough video. Plus I really like the always-on shoulder display. That seems like a real clutch feature for a forgetful person like me that I could just at a glance see if it needs a charge or card swap. Since I can't afford these, I'll be going for the Lumix s5 lol
I don’t know why I don’t agree with you and I saw your video comparison. I thought Fuji was doing great. In fact it was almost snappy when it deduct the face.
Could you make a side-by-side viewfinder recording of the eye AF tracking in action for the A7IV & X-H2s? Preferably with a subject jumping around or moving quickly? Tested the A7IV & X-H2s briefly at the store, but eye AF box on the Fuji trails behind moving subjects while the Sony was way more sticky tracking.
I can, but that’s not gonna be a 1 for 1 comparision because i don’t have an external monitor for both of them so I can’t record them at the same time.. there could be a lot of variable factors that could lean into both sides…
Could be that h2s unit didn’t have the latest firmware, cuz I saw an update following that particular issue. Xh2 already has like 5 firmware updates since release date. For some reason I think they will tweak those issues in the future.
I find the xh2s to be almost as fast as my Sony a1, which is arguably the best autofocus on the market right now; far superior than the a7IV. It’s very close, especially if you adjust the af settings beyond default.
@@TheJ_G read anecdotally comments like these claiming it is almost A1 or R5 level etc. Excited I went out to try it out at the store, but was not true. At least my user experience with moving subjects. I can kind of believe for static posing subjects. Would love for someone to prove me wrong. Show the viewfinder eyeAF box action tracking side-by-side with another sony/canon and then maybe even 100% crop of the shots afterwards if they are in focus. Videos from "The slanted lens" of a model walking towards the camera Fuji misses 5-6 shots out of 36 while sony nails each one. From "Jerred Z" show his son walking around and good number of shots weren't in focus slightly off. AF-S eye detect seem to work works, but AF-C falls apart.
Successful eye tracking is one thing, producing sharp pictures is something else. For people running in cloudy conditions, the A7iv tracking is working great, but only 30% of the shots are properly focused.
I haven't done any concert stuff. But I remember using the AF for both cameras in the dark. And it was around -2EV and both worked well in that situation.
Why I feel the XH2 has better response in auto focusing looking at your test footage? My eyes are a little unconventional, I guess. Or were the labels mixed up?
🤔What do you think about APSC moded A7iv + lens Sigma 18-50 2.8 vs Fuji XH2s. As FF lens is too huge for my daily usage & videos. Price of bodies is almost the same, but I can turn FF on sony any time and use it for photography or low light with other lens. So the question is apsc moded a7iv video quality comparable to XH2s, what do you think about it?
Heyy even I'm looking forward to buy xh2s for filmmaking and vlog stuff or commercial use should I get that or sony like many ppl recommended me sony and user for fujifilm are less in my circle so maybe they dont know the specs for fuji
sony is more reliable because of the AF.. I think sony is the better choice for video... the XH2s is nice, but you may have to just use manual focusing lens and rig it out.
Even though it is one year old, I guess it still prevails. It is probably the best comparison I saw, thanks for that. 👍👌 As said, shame that the exposure is not equal in both cameras for the ISO test. Aperture looked quite different too.
Really great video mate! I keep thinking about jumping to full-frame because I mainly shoot concerts (right now on an 800D with a sigma 18-35 // 50-100). But I'm so in love with my Sigma lenses that I'm considering staying APS-C and getting the Fuji XH2S :D
@@Iamtongue oh yeah, I think I made my mind up! :D now I just have to figure out if Topaz Denoise is working for the Fuji raw files. I tried with some and it doesn’t seem to be working. (I shoot in pretty low light so some noise is unavoidable)
Should’ve concluded the winner after 6k, ProRes, and BRaw capabilities. To me that’s a clear winner. And just to sprinkle on…Fuji Lenses are far more affordable (smaller & lighter) and it’s good to have Viltrox and other third party companies making the ecosystem even more affordable.
Well that argument can be used for any system that has cine lens option lol…Why can’t it be a fair even comparision.. ? Sony e mount lenses made their lenses with good autofocusing for video.. that’s all I’m saying 🫡
It wouldn't be a good investment, paying so much money for good cine lenses to be locked into a system without cinema cameras. In fact, my local rental shops don't even carry it in X-mount. Those lenses only exist in RF or E mount where I live. When Fujifilm comes out with their own compressed internal RAW like BRAW, then maybe. But until then...
@@Iamtongue ... most of Fujifilm's fast prime lenses have been updated with both linear motors and weather-sealing(18/f1.4, 23/f1.4, 33/f1.4, etc.), but the new 56/f1.2 should have included a linear motor as well. Most of Fujifilm's earliest lenses are not so suitable for video work, but some of Sony's early EF lenses struggle too. At this point it should be well-known which lenses can cover you for video usage.
1 more difference. Since sony being full frame, it's lenses even 3rd party ones are expensive . With xh2s you can get more lenses with your budget which is a huge win in my opinion. Example With price Sigma 35 mm 1.2 Dg Dn art for sony , I can buy 2 lenses for fuji i.e. Sigma 18-50mm 2.8g and viltrox 27 mm 1.2g
But for the same look (bokeh) and focal lenght you need on fuji a 23mm F0,8 ... so.. so you might be right about 2 lenes vs 1 but you cannot produce the same reslut because there is no such a lense on apcs
Clear winner is hard to be given. If gauging by pure features then yes the fuji win except for not being full frame, not having as good low light, and less depth of field capabilities. But things are not that simple. For example, which as more heat, a 1Kg object at temperature of 500 degrees or a 1000 kg object at a temperature of 100 degrees. By temperature alone, one would say the 1 kg object, but there clear answer is the 1000 kg object, though only the 1 kg object could burn use by the process of quick heat transfer upon touching it. That analogy is this; while on paper the fujifilm wins; there is something to having such a LARGE Lens lineup. Having access to Sony G, G-master lens, Zeiss lens, Tamron, Sigma, Samyang lens; as well as some smaller obscure ones like viltrox, Meike, Mitakon are invaluable. Even better is Voigtlander; they have some wonderful lenses, including their APO lanthan lens at 35mm, 50mm, 65mm, 110mmi are some of the highest rated lens in the industry. Voigtlander has a few X-mount lens; but no where near the quality or volume that they produce on Sony. Then there is also Longevity. As smartphone camera systems and lenses continue to mature; it will continue to eat up more and more of the cheaper linueup of cameras; companies like apple make processors that are far, far more powerful than any processors available on cameras and thus their ability to tap into computational photography is miles ahead and will continue to be miles ahead, especially todays times when AI is blowing up all over the place (including in interchangeable lens cameras like the A7R5). With that said; just like the point and shoot cameras died out; where will the smaller camera companies be in 5-10years (OM system, Fuji, Pentax, Panasonic). Sony and Canon will no doubt survive, but Fuji? I believe so; as I still think it will take longer (if ever) for smart phones to catch up to APSC, and Medium Format will always be a halo product that phones won't match and that niche will still be around (so hassleblad and gFX will have a market). What i'm trying to say is there may be a benefit to go with Sony or Canon due to the size/stability of their company. Just my two cents.
On the image comparison, you were comparing the embedded preview which could be a jpg with noise reduction, applied for the Sony so not the same base comparison.
Have you taken the A7iv out in the elements? How good is that “weather sealing” really? I only ask because I find myself wanting to purchase the A7iv but I’m concerned about the build quality of the Sony. I don’t wanna worry constantly about being out in some rain or snow. There’s no doubt about Sony image quality 👌🏼
@@Iamtongue Thanks for the reply. I appreciate it. Who do you think is more confident in the build quality. The Sony or Fuji. I’m a stills photographer only. Thanks 🙏🏻
I haven't tried it yet but would love to hear your opinion if you can get the a7 colors to look like Fuji ;) .... cobalt-image is the company that does the Color matching. =) Cheer bro love the vids!!
I think that Fuji focus faster and keeps it on. I reckon that focus switching speed at fuji is at the fastest setting and as such it focus the background very fast and when you come back in frame it tries to focus again in contrast with Sony which it focus the background much slower and when you come back on frame it takes less time to focus. I see an advantage of Sony in close distance focus.
Dear Fujifilm I need that touch to track in video mode on this camera. Thanks Signed, Almost a full fledged Fuji fanboy ( try saying that five times fast )🤣
You can create the best camera ever, but without a good set of lenses to enable it to shine, it’ll be made difficult to use and less attractive. Fuji needs to get their lenses to match their bodies.
Hi. Helpful review. My main feedback would be no need to drop the f-bomb in a camera review. I was watching on my TV and my kids are in the room and they looked at me! I always tell them to save the swearing for when you bash your head on something, not a camera channel!
Oh shoot my bad…I’ll make sure I’ll bleep it out next time! Thanks for your feedback.. When I record I’m doing it in the comfort of my home lol and sometimes I forget people have kids. I’m going to make a better effort moving forward 🫶
l'exemple à 9:00 n'est pas bon; le sony est hors focus ... et à 800 ISO ce n'est pas du grain mais la différence de focus entre les deux appareils vu que le Sony n'a pas le bon focus... sur le X-H2s la carte SD est plus détaillée et ce n'est pas du "grain" ... donc la prochaine fois il faudra faire un focus IDENTIQUE sur les 2 appareils photos ...
"The full frame look is very nice to look at imo, but clients aren't going to be able to tell the difference, so that doesn't really matter", lol, something doesn't sound right :) I'm pretty sure some clients can tell the difference.
It's a marginal difference that doesn't matter nearly as much as other factors. Even most photographers would have a hard time discerning in a blind test.
@@neilr7935 Try turn down the light a little bit and take a group of people or landscape pictures and most people will see different between FF and crop sensor cameras.
Sony is the winner... for now. And not because of image quality or even autofocus, but because of user experiance, menus and lenses. Doesnt matter how good your camera is if you cant use it fast and doesnt feel intuitive. BUT I feel the next iterration of Fuji, like XH3s, especially if we get good lenses by then, could be a game changer.
Study Fuji little more..... Sony is hysterical woman according its menus..... Fuji is in its own class.... Colors .... thats all that matters.... You are making photography, not car racing....
@mcsnapples '+14 stops of dynamic range?' can you please let me know where you found this information? I can't seem to find any info on the Fuji DR numbers. I'm debating between going for a Sony or waiting for the X-Pro4 (which should have the same sensor as the XH2s) and Dynamic Range is at the top of my wish list. If it really is that good I will wait for the next Fuji camera.
Thanks mr jerry. What’s great about RUclips is, there are a bunch of personalities that would far be a better fit for folks like yourselves who feels that I may be a bit brash and abrasive. I am expressing myself in a way that is true and authentic to me.
@@Iamtongue I find this ironic as you list rules for commenting to your video. I believe that statistically, channels grow faster when the language is more conservative and safe for younger viewers. I respect your perspective but it may limit your long run level of success.
where's the irony? I am not disrespecting anyone. Am i personally attacking anyone on this video? I think if you are someone who finds some cuss words offensive, it's best that you stay away from the internet all together. Fragility won't get you far. You are not disrespecting me nor being a dickhead. I respect your opinion, doesn't mean I should adhere to it. And if i were to listen to someone's advice about the success of my channel, i would probably listen to someone with more subscribers than you and me. My demographics ranges from 24-55+ making them all adults, i don't know of anyone that is younger with this much disposable income to buy any of the gear that I would recommend on this channel. And nor do I want them to view my content, as I know that's not who this content is for..So who is this really offending? Not the younger viewers cuz I don't have any..Which brings me back to my first point, there are many personalities out there that would suit you better than me. But I suggest you stay from the internet all together if you are going to be crippled by a few little swear words... But i should note you are commenting on a video that is close to 1 year old. I've toned it down since. @@jerryloradrifter
@@Iamtongue Yes sir, it is a free country and you are right, and it’s your prerogative to use the language you want… But do not mistake my comment or stance to suggest that I am fragile. I just wanted to comment to share another point of view from someone who digs on cameras and such. Seems to me that if you have “toned it down” in some of your more recent videos, that you agree with me on some level.
I made changes to my content because a viewer brought up an important concern. Initially, I was skeptical about altering something I've done for years, but their feedback was sound and logical. Many of my viewers are parents, and one of them mentioned that their child overheard me using profanity while watching my videos during breakfast. It was a valid point, and it made me realize that I should be more considerate. While it's true that not everyone online is equally sensitive, when a viewer approaches me with a well-reasoned request, I'm more than willing to adapt my content. After all, we all share this online space, and it's important to create a positive and inclusive experience for everyone.
This guy just seems to be unsure if his self is not the firmware or the camera but it’s this guy just do not know what he’s really doing when it comes to the Fuji.. he’s a Sony fanboy…. lol
You don’t watch his videos huh, he shoots with Fujifilm more than with the Sony lol. I respect his honesty in his videos, he’s not bought by Fuji or Sony to blow smoke up someone’s behind.
@@enigmaticreverieproduction5169 I think he got mad at the joke where I said sony is the winner near the beginning... and then proceeds to call me a fan boy,, He clearly does not know what I talk about on this channel lol...
Sorry but Fuji color is awful. Always too much magenta. Too warm. Sony color is pretty bad, sure, but Fuji is not the cure. Yes, some film simulations look cool, it's got a style, but absolutely not accurate and very often ugly. In fact, I would rank Fuji dead last in color, Sony second to last. The best color to me is always Panasonic full frame. Then next is probably Nikon, a bit too sharp, constrasty and overly saturated, yes, but for anything other than portraits, it produces fairly eye catching results. Then Canon is probably best for skin tone. It's got a magenta tint, and not even subtle either, but Canon's magenta is just so much more tastefully done than Fuji, which is like piling on the magenta paint bucket.
Which Canon, Sony, Fuji, Nikons are you talking about? It is impossible to generalize since, for example, the Canon R line has many models and some of them look great and some have gross tints/white balance whatever out of the box. They hardly get it right across ALL models and ALL price ranges. Same for Sony, same for Nikon. Given that Fuji tends to use the same sensor across model lines, well, I guess you like it or you don’t-but less variation in image quality. In any case it is pretty easy to correct tints and white balances. So maybe pick the features you want/need and move on?
@matth8816 while each camera may differ a bit and custom white balance may resolve some of the difference, each brand does have a systematic bias in how they interpret sensor data in color. Canon and Fuji generally has more magenta, with Fuji a bit overboard and canon slightly less. Sony is famous for the yellowish green and Nikon a bit yellow. That is the reason some stick to Canon for skin tone and there are die hard Fuji fans.
![Sony A7 IV vs Fujifilm X-H2 - Full Frame vs Features [ A7IV vs XH2 ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HG2hJOx397s/mqdefault.jpg)
![Sony A7 IV vs Fujifilm X-H2 - Full Frame vs Features [ A7IV vs XH2 ]](/img/tr.png)
Is there a clear winner?
There is no clear winner . All about individual preference! A effortless video .. Thank you so much 🙏
Which one gives a better image quality/more detailed image resolution?
@@pinetworkminer8377 "better image quality" is subjective but I prefer Fuji's image. However a cleaner looking image is sony. A detailed image is going to be sony. Sony lenses are sharper than fuji lenses..Especially the gmasters. plus 33 mp is more than the 26mp so that will give you more detailed image resolution..
@@Iamtongue forward to see this go up against the H2 40 mega pixels
Right now Sony is the clear winner, new bodies that outclass competitors come and go, but good affordable AF glass at different focal ranges is hard to get on Fuji (and has been for a long time). Having said that Fuji makes incredible cameras for street photography and the video coming from the XH2 is incredible.....if Fuji get's more third party manufacturers to develop XF glass I will definitely give the edge to Fuji.
If Fuji and Sony got together to create a Full Frame E-mount camera, it would be the greatest collab of all time.
LOL that would be awesome
Better create a faster medium format camera. Too many FF cameras out there.
@@bobby350z if they can create a MF with speed it’s game over
XH2s as it is, same sensor specs but full frame + Sony autofocus and they would make a ton of money
Had a Sony A7rx for 3 years and ever came to love the color. Just so.. so. With Fuji it is often great and never bad. Could not go back.
After owning both… I give it to the X-H2s is superior in all fronts for filmmakers even coming almost close to beat FX3, the only thing I can think anyone would be biased towards the A7iv is if you want Full frame but gotta deal with crops, bad battery life vs other Sonys. Ill take a better sensor all day X-H2s is king at the $2k range imo.
Great comparison… the only issue I have is with the low light comparison. The Fujifilm looks to have a higher exposure, which will make noise stand out more. Adjusting the Sony exposure to match the Fuji will reveal more noise.
I’m actually really impressed with have the Fujifilm retains detail at higher ISO.
I get that. But if compared to each other equivalent there are things that should be untouched no?
This seems interesting. The Hybrid Shooter's testing showed the X-H2S was darker than Sony by 2/3 stops at same ISO values, hence ISO 2500 on XH2S looked like ISO 1600 on Sony. Yours is kinda like the reverse. Potentially t-stop differences? I'm not sure.
@@Iamtongue Personally, I think for a true comparison, exposure and even depth of field should be matched.
Same ISO number on each camera can result in different exposures.
One can also get away with shooting a full stop wider on APS-C while maintaining the same DOF as FF, so that factors in as well.
@@neilr7935 interesting.. ok I’ll keep that in mind in upcoming videos.. thank you
@@Iamtongue Oh actually, maybe in future see if you can adapt some old EF glass instead. That would get rid of any potential T-stop differences. Maybe with a Sigma/Canon 50mm or something.
Some of the ISO comparisons shots had the A7iv in embedded preview... iirc it's a lower res preview and not the full details right? You gotta select all the images, go under Library > Previews > Build ... Previews.
Thanks man, will apply this on future videos
Fuji has the 18mm and 27mm pancake lenses. Even their 35mm f1.4 is very small by comparison to most full frame lenses.
Fuji has excellent image quality and once you put your photo into an editing program, the difference in final output would be indistinguishable.
Fuji for the win... of course!!!
Fujifilm🎉
YESSIR
Too bad what’s on paper isn’t reality.
Heyy even I'm looking forward to buy xh2s for filmmaking and vlog stuff or commercial use should I get that or sony like many ppl recommended me sony
What I find most interesting here is the highlight roll off. Notice @14:21 the light that is positioned to the right of the subject does not roll off in a natural way in the Sony image. It has a harsh blue border around it. Also notice the spill onto the desk. These nuances are what separates a OK image from a great image. The Fujifilm has a far superior image and much better image processing.
Talking about noise, the FujiFilm has noise, sure, but none of the ugly confetti color noise that most cameras suffer from. The XH2S noise looks organic… film like. The Sony instead favors noise reduction, which crushes detail. It’s a clear win for the Fujifilm camera.
Now if only Fujifilm would make a cinema variant, with removable EVF… just use the one from the GFX100 II, it’s excellent. Add a built in fan… built in eVND and internal BRaw… then we are off to the races.
fuji all the way.
you got it 🥰
sony seemed to have improved color sciencee a lot but xh2s is really not behind regarding anything
For stills I would buy the Sony, but I would probably go with a used a7riv or a7iii instead of an a7iv. If I was interested in video, I would go with the Fuji. Both cameras are amazing though and can do anything.
5:00 Why are fuji colors so dark, how do we get a clean image like sony?
YES SIRRRR the wait we've all been waiting for!!
YES SIR!
I want a stacked sensor on the XT5! I prefer the retro dials versus the XH2S.
I wonder if they would make a fujifilm xt5-s variant.. I don’t think they would just keep that sensor into the XH2s body alone.
@@Iamtongue
Let’s hope. I think we both know that people who shoot fashion and intense street photography need the extra speed and I would love to have the better viewfinder also! These old eyes need some help! 🖖
@@Iamtongue I think that stacked sensor will find its way into another camera, but not where we think... Fujifilm cine camera with even more dynamic range, perhaps???
@@GrayGhostDog1 that would be interesting NGL...
In my opinion, the comparison is not fair. I owned both, though, in video spec fujifilm wins, but in your colour comparison, my Sony look sharper and noise free in iso 2800.
I don't know how you got that plastic colour for Sony in low light comparison.
I'm surprised by your results with the A7iv AF. I got a bunch of misses so I tested it on people running. Cloudy conditions, 70 200 GM2 at f2.8 or f3.2. Only 30% of the pics were properly focused while tracking worked fine.
Besides, you should mention that 10 FPS is only possible with compressed with loss (or lower) format AND EVF refresh rate at 10 FPS with black out. You will most probably lose your subject.
I've heard bad things about the autofocus on the 70-200 GM, apparently the GM ii is way better.
@@martinruiz398 The optical quality of the 70-200 GM II is stunning. I have experienced it on static subjects. But the A7iv struggles for focusing on moving subjects.
Get a better lens.
around the 10 min mark I thought the fuji was just way sharper than the sony not actually more noise. The scratches and everything looked way sharper on the Fuji. What was NR set to?
AS a sony shooter i will say FUJI had it in the video AF test, and the noise at higher iso and how the image was rendering looked very very nice on the Fuji, maybe organic and has life compared to digital etc on the A7IV, I being old school actually prefer a little bit of texture, grit or grain in the image rather than just clean and bland... also the banding using LED on the A7IV, solved on the Fuji, but it also a non-issue on my A9II LOL. I would be happy to use files from the fuji at 12800 iso. Im very tempted to go back to Fuji now the XH2S has come along and the new line of LM fuji lenses. Great review 🙂
Come back Karl we miss you :)
I disagree. Only that initial focus was Fuji faster. After that Sony was focused in immediately, while Fuji was not. And I’m a Fuji shooter. Not sure how much longer. I wanted Fuji to be better because I have then lenses, but it’s not.
@@JLStreetDoc i hear your pain.. had both the XH2 and XH2s on loan for two weeks, the XH2s is defo faster at acquiring focus than my A9ll and almost more sensitive in low light. stunning camera all be told. if it did not have that stupid flippy screen i would for sure have one, paired with the new line of lenses it was really a pleasure to use. XH2 was great image quality, and the way it rendered the images was 1st class, again the screen was an issue and wasn't keen on the dampened feeling shutter release compared to the 2s but as a combo, they would be fantastic... but the screen for me is a deal breaker, makes things off center for my dim wit brain when using waist level etc and de stabilizes the left of the camera to hold also gives a less discreet visual to the client when want to be invisible, XT5 well I've had xt1,2 and 3 and never liked the dials so don't think that is on the cards although it does have a tilt screen LOL. what i decided to do to shrink my sony gear, removed the grip from the A9ll and sold it, sold all my GM glass bar the 16-35 as need that for a client, purchased the Batis range of lenses now have a smaller setup and lenses with character, i was never a fan of the huge GM glass and its surgical, clinical sharpness. forgive my waffling on...LOL also sold my A7rIV and now to replace either with a A7IV or do i bite the bullet and get the XT5 and a 33mm f1.4.. ermmmm ??
@@karlbratby4349 it's fun see others give away what u want... I'm on a journey for the clinical sharpness and you already pass through this and don't want any more...
But I'm struggling with the doubt, a7iv, the upcoming a7cii or xh2s - I love the colors on Fuji, but I do much jobs in low light situations and I have E-Mount glasses... Difficult choice...
@@Pontcher I ditched all my Sony gear now, went with an Xh2s and an XH2 and they are great, XH2s is almost on par high iso as my A9ll was and pair with the primes and shoot maybe 1 stop wider and its awesome, glass is amazing, 18, 23, 33 and new 56 are awesome. not over-keen on the flippy screen and still lack of glowing permanent AF point so at times it gets lost but I'm sure eventually they will add this.
Sony lens options have matured, that’s true. But the native prices of the Sony is insane
also true... but the price for Fuji lenses are creeping up there
Third party lenses for Fuji are rolling out with regularity now also. And they aren’t new lens designs… they are proven winners from solid manufacturers, with Sigma being a big deal for me personally (1.4 trio, 18-50 f2.8).
I agree @ Enigmatic Reverie. I would love to have a full frame Sony camera but their lens cost is insane if you are new to their ecosystem.
Dude this was a nice comparison video so thank you.
Thanks Adam!
The banding is something I’ve seen in lowlight footage on the a7v too, interesting that the Fuji doesn’t have any.
Would it have something to do with the stacked sensor?
The low light results are interesting. It looks like the Sony noise reduction is increasingly stronger starting at ISO 3200.
I think that’s the dual native iso kicking in.
@@Iamtongue both cameras have dual native iso though.
(10:35) Isn't the SPny picture slightly out of focus? Or is that a DOF thing, I wonder...
Could be a DOF thing..
Which lense for video for the fuji with good autofocus
You should look at it using Capture One. With my X-H2S I found the raw conversion was not sharp at all. I haven't done noise tests of the two programs yet.
I hear capture one is better processing Fuji raws.. but LR has ai features like masking and what nots to make it easier on my workflow. I tried c1 for a week and I was not comfortable with the workflow
@@Iamtongue If I get time over Christmas I may post some examples. The sharpness difference is shocking.
Great comparison video. The ISO button can now be bypassed all together, you can assign directly a d pad buttons up/down or dial wheel no need to even touch that annoying top iso button 👍
yup!
Outstanding video! I agree Fuji still needs to tweak the AF for both, video and stills!
Thanks Jose! They’re so close
The autofocus problem in the xh2s video caused by the mechanics in fuji lenses,
Try using some of fuji newer lenses like the 33mm it's so much better in autofocus and never stutter
you right.
If I could afford either of these, I'd probably go for the Fuji for video specs and good enough video. Plus I really like the always-on shoulder display. That seems like a real clutch feature for a forgetful person like me that I could just at a glance see if it needs a charge or card swap.
Since I can't afford these, I'll be going for the Lumix s5 lol
the S5 is a very great value, I want to pick one up haha
I don’t know why I don’t agree with you and I saw your video comparison. I thought Fuji was doing great. In fact it was almost snappy when it deduct the face.
Could you make a side-by-side viewfinder recording of the eye AF tracking in action for the A7IV & X-H2s? Preferably with a subject jumping around or moving quickly?
Tested the A7IV & X-H2s briefly at the store, but eye AF box on the Fuji trails behind moving subjects while the Sony was way more sticky tracking.
I can, but that’s not gonna be a 1 for 1 comparision because i don’t have an external monitor for both of them so I can’t record them at the same time.. there could be a lot of variable factors that could lean into both sides…
Could be that h2s unit didn’t have the latest firmware, cuz I saw an update following that particular issue.
Xh2 already has like 5 firmware updates since release date.
For some reason I think they will tweak those issues in the future.
I find the xh2s to be almost as fast as my Sony a1, which is arguably the best autofocus on the market right now; far superior than the a7IV. It’s very close, especially if you adjust the af settings beyond default.
@@TheJ_G read anecdotally comments like these claiming it is almost A1 or R5 level etc. Excited I went out to try it out at the store, but was not true. At least my user experience with moving subjects. I can kind of believe for static posing subjects.
Would love for someone to prove me wrong. Show the viewfinder eyeAF box action tracking side-by-side with another sony/canon and then maybe even 100% crop of the shots afterwards if they are in focus.
Videos from "The slanted lens" of a model walking towards the camera Fuji misses 5-6 shots out of 36 while sony nails each one. From "Jerred Z" show his son walking around and good number of shots weren't in focus slightly off. AF-S eye detect seem to work works, but AF-C falls apart.
Successful eye tracking is one thing, producing sharp pictures is something else. For people running in cloudy conditions, the A7iv tracking is working great, but only 30% of the shots are properly focused.
Cool comparison bro! A few more updates and the focus could be great on the X-H2s.
thanks bro! I wonder if they can give us touch to focus 😁😁
@@Iamtongue I hope so🤞
I sold my a7iv and got the xh2s. It is a a much better choice for video in every way!
I have a friend who did the same thing!
The Sony looks kind of soft; like a noise reduction is applied by the cam, 🤔
Could be!
I think it's the embedded preview. Sony is viewing JPEG, Fuji is viewing RAW. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Fujifilm 👏
Yessir!
Why are you looking for noise in the midtones and highlights area? You should be looking at the shadows area, easier to spot the noise.
i'm looking at everything.
Thank you for making this - i love your energy
Dawe thanks so much I appreciate that 🫶🥰
Thanks you are obviously a fujifanboy and struggling giving Sony credit, but great details on this one
thanks papi chulo
I'm a concert photographer and I want to know if the autofocus works well in darker light situations?
Thanks for your work!
I haven't done any concert stuff. But I remember using the AF for both cameras in the dark. And it was around -2EV and both worked well in that situation.
@@Iamtongue thanks🫶
Why I feel the XH2 has better response in auto focusing looking at your test footage? My eyes are a little unconventional, I guess. Or were the labels mixed up?
Ya there are instances it picked up faster for video
@@Iamtongue Thanks
🤔What do you think about APSC moded A7iv + lens Sigma 18-50 2.8 vs Fuji XH2s. As FF lens is too huge for my daily usage & videos. Price of bodies is almost the same, but I can turn FF on sony any time and use it for photography or low light with other lens. So the question is apsc moded a7iv video quality comparable to XH2s, what do you think about it?
Sounds good in theory! I still think the XH2s is better..
Great video. What about the xh2?….I am a true hybrid shooter and the photo capability of the xh2 appeal to me a lot….
ya man it's a great camera!
Heyy even I'm looking forward to buy xh2s for filmmaking and vlog stuff or commercial use should I get that or sony like many ppl recommended me sony and user for fujifilm are less in my circle so maybe they dont know the specs for fuji
sony is more reliable because of the AF.. I think sony is the better choice for video... the XH2s is nice, but you may have to just use manual focusing lens and rig it out.
Even though it is one year old, I guess it still prevails.
It is probably the best comparison I saw, thanks for that. 👍👌
As said, shame that the exposure is not equal in both cameras for the ISO test.
Aperture looked quite different too.
Thank you! And ya full frame sensor vs Apsc sensor you’ll notice some differences
if some one prefer sony over fuji colors he should change industry ;-) this is only one thing to make sonny perfect camera plastic colors
Ignorant is bliss isn’t it? 😂 they don’t know what they don’t know
Worth adding that longer lens on full frame are huge… for me too big.
i get the weight and size is a factor for some folks...
Really great video mate! I keep thinking about jumping to full-frame because I mainly shoot concerts (right now on an 800D with a sigma 18-35 // 50-100). But I'm so in love with my Sigma lenses that I'm considering staying APS-C and getting the Fuji XH2S :D
man sigma lenses are really good so that's a good idea
@@Iamtongue oh yeah, I think I made my mind up! :D now I just have to figure out if Topaz Denoise is working for the Fuji raw files. I tried with some and it doesn’t seem to be working. (I shoot in pretty low light so some noise is unavoidable)
Should’ve concluded the winner after 6k, ProRes, and BRaw capabilities. To me that’s a clear winner. And just to sprinkle on…Fuji Lenses are far more affordable (smaller & lighter) and it’s good to have Viltrox and other third party companies making the ecosystem even more affordable.
You right. I think both are good in their own right and in terms of specs the Fuji wins.
Heyy even I'm looking forward to buy xh2s for filmmaking and vlog stuff or commercial use should I get that or sony like many ppl recommended me sony
Thanks for this review
Thank you 😊
If you’re worried about lens choice for 'serious' video, Fuji has the T2.9 lenses. An 18-55 and a 50-135 dedicated cine lenses.
Well that argument can be used for any system that has cine lens option lol…Why can’t it be a fair even comparision.. ? Sony e mount lenses made their lenses with good autofocusing for video.. that’s all I’m saying 🫡
It wouldn't be a good investment, paying so much money for good cine lenses to be locked into a system without cinema cameras. In fact, my local rental shops don't even carry it in X-mount. Those lenses only exist in RF or E mount where I live. When Fujifilm comes out with their own compressed internal RAW like BRAW, then maybe. But until then...
@@professionalpotato4764 this man is based 👍🫡
@@Iamtongue ... most of Fujifilm's fast prime lenses have been updated with both linear motors and weather-sealing(18/f1.4, 23/f1.4, 33/f1.4, etc.), but the new 56/f1.2 should have included a linear motor as well.
Most of Fujifilm's earliest lenses are not so suitable for video work, but some of Sony's early EF lenses struggle too. At this point it should be well-known which lenses can cover you for video usage.
1 more difference. Since sony being full frame, it's lenses even 3rd party ones are expensive . With xh2s you can get more lenses with your budget which is a huge win in my opinion. Example With price Sigma 35 mm 1.2 Dg Dn art for sony , I can buy 2 lenses for fuji i.e. Sigma 18-50mm 2.8g and viltrox 27 mm 1.2g
you are right
But for the same look (bokeh) and focal lenght you need on fuji a 23mm F0,8 ... so.. so you might be right about 2 lenes vs 1 but you cannot produce the same reslut because there is no such a lense on apcs
@@sup3rs0p0 Right on the point. For beginners like myself with less budget, APSC is a good option
Clear winner is hard to be given. If gauging by pure features then yes the fuji win except for not being full frame, not having as good low light, and less depth of field capabilities. But things are not that simple. For example, which as more heat, a 1Kg object at temperature of 500 degrees or a 1000 kg object at a temperature of 100 degrees. By temperature alone, one would say the 1 kg object, but there clear answer is the 1000 kg object, though only the 1 kg object could burn use by the process of quick heat transfer upon touching it.
That analogy is this; while on paper the fujifilm wins; there is something to having such a LARGE Lens lineup. Having access to Sony G, G-master lens, Zeiss lens, Tamron, Sigma, Samyang lens; as well as some smaller obscure ones like viltrox, Meike, Mitakon are invaluable. Even better is Voigtlander; they have some wonderful lenses, including their APO lanthan lens at 35mm, 50mm, 65mm, 110mmi are some of the highest rated lens in the industry. Voigtlander has a few X-mount lens; but no where near the quality or volume that they produce on Sony.
Then there is also Longevity. As smartphone camera systems and lenses continue to mature; it will continue to eat up more and more of the cheaper linueup of cameras; companies like apple make processors that are far, far more powerful than any processors available on cameras and thus their ability to tap into computational photography is miles ahead and will continue to be miles ahead, especially todays times when AI is blowing up all over the place (including in interchangeable lens cameras like the A7R5). With that said; just like the point and shoot cameras died out; where will the smaller camera companies be in 5-10years (OM system, Fuji, Pentax, Panasonic). Sony and Canon will no doubt survive, but Fuji? I believe so; as I still think it will take longer (if ever) for smart phones to catch up to APSC, and Medium Format will always be a halo product that phones won't match and that niche will still be around (so hassleblad and gFX will have a market). What i'm trying to say is there may be a benefit to go with Sony or Canon due to the size/stability of their company.
Just my two cents.
On the image comparison, you were comparing the embedded preview which could be a jpg with noise reduction, applied for the Sony so not the same base comparison.
ohh my bad
@@Iamtongue It can happen 😉 thank you for your hard work 💪
Great vid thanks! Subbed.
Now waiting for X-H2S vs X-H2 comparison;)
you got it daddy!
But please focus on photography, not video hahahaha
@@enigmaticreverieproduction5169 I can't please everyone! But i'll try lol
Thanks for making this video !!!
thank you!
Have you taken the A7iv out in the elements? How good is that “weather sealing” really? I only ask because I find myself wanting to purchase the A7iv but I’m concerned about the build quality of the Sony. I don’t wanna worry constantly about being out in some rain or snow. There’s no doubt about Sony image quality 👌🏼
I’ve used it once in a mild snow storm.. it held up nice.
To give you some context it was probably -10 degree C and I believe it was snow squalls…
@@Iamtongue Thanks for the reply. I appreciate it. Who do you think is more confident in the build quality. The Sony or Fuji. I’m a stills photographer only.
Thanks 🙏🏻
@@cannondale1100 I prefer the build of the Sony a smidge better.. the buttons are nicer than the flushed buttons on the Fujifilm..
@@Iamtongue Thanks..
That was a great comparison..
I may pull the trigger on the A7iv.
Tamron 17-70 f2.8 with image stabilization is fantastic on the XH2s
How’s the autofocusing with it though?
@@Iamtongue It’s very good. Easily one of the best options for the XH2s.
How would you compare it with the Fujinon 16-55mm 2.8?
3rd party lenses have been available for fuji xmount for years.
Ya they are just getting good third party lenses now..Sony has them fleshed out in both departments
On paper if fujifilm's af was as good as the the sony or even 70% as good, Fujifilm would sell really well.
I agree.
Those colours were crazy coming out of the XH2S. Did you grade them? Or was it a film simulation? FLOG2?
The videos I graded yea. Some of them were from a conversion lut pack and some I graded with filmconvert
@@Iamtongue Does film convert work just as well for the A7IV? Do you think you could get similar image and grade from the Sony?
@@AwesomeKicks yes they have a Sony camera pack you can download as well..
I haven't tried it yet but would love to hear your opinion if you can get the a7 colors to look like Fuji ;) .... cobalt-image is the company that does the Color matching. =) Cheer bro love the vids!!
I’m gonna look into it
Rolling shutter ?
sony a7iv is really bad
I think that Fuji focus faster and keeps it on. I reckon that focus switching speed at fuji is at the fastest setting and as such it focus the background very fast and when you come back in frame it tries to focus again in contrast with Sony which it focus the background much slower and when you come back on frame it takes less time to focus. I see an advantage of Sony in close distance focus.
Fuji look for me!
Replying before watching but better be the Fuji 😂
HAHAH 😂
Dear Fujifilm I need that touch to track in video mode on this camera.
Thanks
Signed,
Almost a full fledged Fuji fanboy ( try saying that five times fast )🤣
Yessir! I think if we complained to Fuji it might come true.. just like the xt5 lcd screen lol
Yes, Fuji all the way....!
all the way :D
Fuji for the win! Just because I like an underdog.
I do love underdogs
You can create the best camera ever, but without a good set of lenses to enable it to shine, it’ll be made difficult to use and less attractive.
Fuji needs to get their lenses to match their bodies.
🙌
Hi. Helpful review. My main feedback would be no need to drop the f-bomb in a camera review. I was watching on my TV and my kids are in the room and they looked at me! I always tell them to save the swearing for when you bash your head on something, not a camera channel!
Oh shoot my bad…I’ll make sure I’ll bleep it out next time! Thanks for your feedback.. When I record I’m doing it in the comfort of my home lol and sometimes I forget people have kids. I’m going to make a better effort moving forward 🫶
sony colors are meant to be graded like a painting with an undercoat.
😂
@@Iamtongue
You should take photos of yourself when comparing ISO performance of the 2 cameras
Okay
l'exemple à 9:00 n'est pas bon; le sony est hors focus ... et à 800 ISO ce n'est pas du grain mais la différence de focus entre les deux appareils vu que le Sony n'a pas le bon focus... sur le X-H2s la carte SD est plus détaillée et ce n'est pas du "grain" ... donc la prochaine fois il faudra faire un focus IDENTIQUE sur les 2 appareils photos ...
*Fuji focuses right away on face and Sony lags behind by 2-3 seconds*
"I'm not sure about the Fuji, sometimes it doesn't know what it wants"😂
Don’t know what happened there but sony still wins 😅🤷🏻♂️
@@Iamtongue If Fuji could sort out the jitteriness I think it'd be tier 1 autofocus
"The full frame look is very nice to look at imo, but clients aren't going to be able to tell the difference, so that doesn't really matter", lol, something doesn't sound right :) I'm pretty sure some clients can tell the difference.
Ya keyword is “some”
It's a marginal difference that doesn't matter nearly as much as other factors.
Even most photographers would have a hard time discerning in a blind test.
If those clients aren’t executives for top camera tech companies, I don’t think they’ll notice lol
@@Eyeofkamau You guys probably don’t do enough serious pro works. FF would make job easier. It’s easier in low light settings. It’s easier to edit.
@@neilr7935 Try turn down the light a little bit and take a group of people or landscape pictures and most people will see different between FF and crop sensor cameras.
Fuji clear winner, no comparison
yessir!
Sony win all the way🎉
Love it!! 🫶😂
Sony is the winner... for now. And not because of image quality or even autofocus, but because of user experiance, menus and lenses. Doesnt matter how good your camera is if you cant use it fast and doesnt feel intuitive. BUT I feel the next iterration of Fuji, like XH3s, especially if we get good lenses by then, could be a game changer.
Good take!
Study Fuji little more..... Sony is hysterical woman according its menus.....
Fuji is in its own class.... Colors .... thats all that matters.... You are making photography, not car racing....
@mcsnapples '+14 stops of dynamic range?' can you please let me know where you found this information? I can't seem to find any info on the Fuji DR numbers. I'm debating between going for a Sony or waiting for the X-Pro4 (which should have the same sensor as the XH2s) and Dynamic Range is at the top of my wish list. If it really is that good I will wait for the next Fuji camera.
Someone on earth said they prefer Sony colours? Were they drunk when they said that?
haha i know wild
Your video is great Mr. Tongue, but your profanity is not necessary to make your point and is considered offensive by many people
Thanks mr jerry. What’s great about RUclips is, there are a bunch of personalities that would far be a better fit for folks like yourselves who feels that I may be a bit brash and abrasive. I am expressing myself in a way that is true and authentic to me.
@@Iamtongue I find this ironic as you list rules for commenting to your video. I believe that statistically, channels grow faster when the language is more conservative and safe for younger viewers. I respect your perspective but it may limit your long run level of success.
where's the irony? I am not disrespecting anyone. Am i personally attacking anyone on this video? I think if you are someone who finds some cuss words offensive, it's best that you stay away from the internet all together. Fragility won't get you far. You are not disrespecting me nor being a dickhead. I respect your opinion, doesn't mean I should adhere to it. And if i were to listen to someone's advice about the success of my channel, i would probably listen to someone with more subscribers than you and me. My demographics ranges from 24-55+ making them all adults, i don't know of anyone that is younger with this much disposable income to buy any of the gear that I would recommend on this channel. And nor do I want them to view my content, as I know that's not who this content is for..So who is this really offending? Not the younger viewers cuz I don't have any..Which brings me back to my first point, there are many personalities out there that would suit you better than me. But I suggest you stay from the internet all together if you are going to be crippled by a few little swear words... But i should note you are commenting on a video that is close to 1 year old. I've toned it down since. @@jerryloradrifter
@@Iamtongue Yes sir, it is a free country and you are right, and it’s your prerogative to use the language you want… But do not mistake my comment or stance to suggest that I am fragile. I just wanted to comment to share another point of view from someone who digs on cameras and such. Seems to me that if you have “toned it down” in some of your more recent videos, that you agree with me on some level.
I made changes to my content because a viewer brought up an important concern. Initially, I was skeptical about altering something I've done for years, but their feedback was sound and logical. Many of my viewers are parents, and one of them mentioned that their child overheard me using profanity while watching my videos during breakfast. It was a valid point, and it made me realize that I should be more considerate. While it's true that not everyone online is equally sensitive, when a viewer approaches me with a well-reasoned request, I'm more than willing to adapt my content. After all, we all share this online space, and it's important to create a positive and inclusive experience for everyone.
Why a7iv and not a1? And ofc xh2s is better
Cuz both are the same price lol
@@Iamtongue price doesn't reflect necessarily the features or how good a camera is
@@Iamtongue lol there is always someone in the comments like this.
Well pay $5200 for a1 and this fuji is around 2150$, so you want to compare the two 🙄?
@@waseemsmathscienceandnatur3379 yeah why not? Money doesnt have to do with sth necessarilly
This guy just seems to be unsure if his self is not the firmware or the camera but it’s this guy just do not know what he’s really doing when it comes to the Fuji.. he’s a Sony fanboy…. lol
Robert you back again? Lmao
I see you turned off your comments for your own channel 😂😂😂 was it because of me?
Fuji clear did better job on autofocus on your video. Come on.
ohhhhh 😳
I light tight lol
Sony 🤮
sooo gross 😆🤮
Looks like you don’t want the one that’s not consistent and it looks like you ain’t there yet. Let’s get it together Sony fan boy. 😅😢
someone woke up on the wrong side of the cage this morning.
We do not play when it comes to Fuji.. get it right or do not mess with it..!! And I guess you haven’t woke up at all… 👎🏾😅
@@robertbland5131 go woke go broke.. Sony all the way Bob. Take that to the bank and smoke it
You don’t watch his videos huh, he shoots with Fujifilm more than with the Sony lol. I respect his honesty in his videos, he’s not bought by Fuji or Sony to blow smoke up someone’s behind.
@@enigmaticreverieproduction5169 I think he got mad at the joke where I said sony is the winner near the beginning... and then proceeds to call me a fan boy,, He clearly does not know what I talk about on this channel lol...
I hate fuji color.
you prefer sony?!
@@Iamtongue if compare with fuji, i still prefer sony. But nikon color still better than sony. Fuji cant make pure grey color
ohhh that's why...
Annoying music, leaving.
Tell someone who cares
Sorry but Fuji color is awful. Always too much magenta. Too warm. Sony color is pretty bad, sure, but Fuji is not the cure. Yes, some film simulations look cool, it's got a style, but absolutely not accurate and very often ugly. In fact, I would rank Fuji dead last in color, Sony second to last.
The best color to me is always Panasonic full frame.
Then next is probably Nikon, a bit too sharp, constrasty and overly saturated, yes, but for anything other than portraits, it produces fairly eye catching results.
Then Canon is probably best for skin tone. It's got a magenta tint, and not even subtle either, but Canon's magenta is just so much more tastefully done than Fuji, which is like piling on the magenta paint bucket.
you lost credibility when you said sony is second sir.
@Iamtongue learn some reading, I said Sony second worst. LOL, Fuji fanboys are usually color blind and Illiterate, too.
lol shit my bad ahaha you written a full on dairy post. i'll ask for the cliff notes next time 😂🤘
Which Canon, Sony, Fuji, Nikons are you talking about? It is impossible to generalize since, for example, the Canon R line has many models and some of them look great and some have gross tints/white balance whatever out of the box. They hardly get it right across ALL models and ALL price ranges. Same for Sony, same for Nikon. Given that Fuji tends to use the same sensor across model lines, well, I guess you like it or you don’t-but less variation in image quality. In any case it is pretty easy to correct tints and white balances. So maybe pick the features you want/need and move on?
@matth8816 while each camera may differ a bit and custom white balance may resolve some of the difference, each brand does have a systematic bias in how they interpret sensor data in color. Canon and Fuji generally has more magenta, with Fuji a bit overboard and canon slightly less. Sony is famous for the yellowish green and Nikon a bit yellow. That is the reason some stick to Canon for skin tone and there are die hard Fuji fans.
If Sony would give us a full frame in a Fuji body, I d be all over it. Lol!
same bro!
if fujifilm would make a FF we would not need Sony !!!