Prosecutor says she saw defense planning to use photos in closing argument she's never seen before
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2021
- Closing arguments began on Monday, Nov. 22, 2021 in the trial of the killing of Ahmaud Arbery.
Arbery was shot and killed on Feb. 23, 2020. Cellphone video leaked to the public shows two armed white men in a truck approaching the 25-year-old Black man as he runs down the road. One of the men, later identified as Travis McMichael, and Arbery struggle over McMichael's shotgun before Arbery is shot and collapses.
Travis McMichael, his father Gregory McMichael and William "Roddy" Bryan, who recorded the video, are all charged with murder in Arbery's death.
More trial coverage, here: www.11alive.com/ahmaudarbery
Subscribe to 11Alive for exclusive content: bit.ly/11AliveSubscribe
11Alive is Where Atlanta Speaks. We believe that news shouldn’t be a one-way conversation, but a dialogue with you. Join in, share your thoughts and connect with new perspectives.
Follow 11Alive on Social:
Facebook: / 11alive
Twitter: / 11alivenews
Instagram: / 11alive .
.
.
Arbery was shot and killed on Feb. 23, 2020. Cellphone video leaked to the public shows two armed white men in a truck approaching the 25-year-old Black man as he runs down the road. One of the men, later identified as Travis McMichael, and Arbery struggle over McMichael's shotgun before Arbery is shot and collapses.
Travis McMichael, his father Gregory McMichael and William "Roddy" Bryan, who recorded the video, are all charged with murder in Arbery's death.
More trial coverage, here: www.11alive.com/ahmaudarbery
Subscribe to 11Alive for exclusive content: bit.ly/11AliveSubscribe
11Alive is Where Atlanta Speaks. We believe that news shouldn’t be a one-way conversation, but a dialogue with you. Join in, share your thoughts and connect with new perspectives.
Follow 11Alive on Social:
Facebook: / 11alive
Twitter: / 11alivenews
Instagram: / 11alive
This prosecutor must have failed recess, because she don’t play
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Damn right!!👌
🤣🤣
Funny lol
A+
The prosecutor wiped the floor with the defence and I love her for it
This prosecuter was savage! She has more balls than all of them.
Yes! She gave the world a lesson on law...if you didn't know now you know
@@Pecantandesigns very true she chewed their asses up with that bs
Than those dopes in Wisconsin.
No she’s not after the truth she’s trying to suppress the truth. Sad that people who no nothing of the law cannot see that. If it was y’all on trial for murder you’d want all evidence revealed.
Bootlickers nauseate me.
I love that woman! So professional, she knows what she's doing
She was awesome.
Linda Dunikoski
LOVE TO WATCH HER IN ACTION, HER BODY LANGUAGE, QUICK MIND, GREAT PACE, EFFECTIVE,
The prosecutor's office in Brunswick was so crooked they brought Dunikoski in from Atlanta.
and she alienated the jury and last the case - yep, mind like a steel trap lol
I'd hate to be this woman's kid, ain't nothing getting by her. She know what you're gonna do before you do it lol
Which makes her a great prosector, I guess. My mom was a prosecutor too and we always joke that she knows if even one Cheeto is missing from the Cheetos bag...
That's how my mom was lol.
I am married to someone like that , ain’t easy
@@nycgweed 😂
😂😂😂😂 right. you would ALWAYS be on trial.
This judge is going to become famous for how he handled this entire case I applaud him
Yep he is a judge that took a oath and is sticking by that. This case will definitely be part of his legacy
Kyle Rittenhouse was RIGHTFULLY NOT FOUND GUILTY THOUGH.
@@crimsonkings205 Methinks you do protest too much - could it be you are not really certain of your statement?
@@crimsonkings205 I agree, but calm the f**k down. This is a different trial where the defendants are actually guilty.
@@crimsonkings205 cool story bro, but old news.
It looks like the defense are trying to cause a mistrial at this point after the earlier denial.
Snake tactics and the lady ain't letting nothing slide. A real pro.
Notice how he never denied what she said
The Prosecutor is NOT playing... She is a real one!
She's on their bumper, she's killing their bs defense!
Wish she could have prosecuted the Trayvon martin case. She is SHARP!
@Shoji Lynn “ Trayvon was a thug” - 👨💻
So you all missed the part where no "new evidence" was ever part of his presentation? You didnt notice how flustered she was and cool/collected the defense was? lol. Clearly she knows how terrible her closing was and she jumped the gun, for nothing..lol..She was prepared to object to everything and ended up objecting to nothing at all if you watched his closing..lol
@@Sciences0311 Lawyers use emotional demonstration as a tool. It’s clear you know nothing of law practice.
This judge just looks so exasperated and completely over the nonsense taking place in his court room. He's done an incredible job.
Prior bad acts of alleged victim . Not admitted. Police video of Aubry being confronted by police in a drug area. He practically charged police
HE WAS TASED
@@jefffetzer8201 😒😒😒😒😒..... anyway, yes this judge is doing a great job.
I concur!!!
@@jefffetzer8201 Taser didn't go off. And he was sitting in his car listening to music. If you're going to tell a story, come correct with it. That's right bring up his record to justify your actions when you 've f'up. You do realize Arbery is not the one on trial.
i agree... sensible guy
out of all the trials ive watched, this judge has been BY FAR the absolute best; most professional.
It's being televised, he's hardly going to act like a biased tyrant..
Absolutely agree Carnisha 👍
@@Neverod8doreveN The Rittenhouse judge disagrees
@@Neverod8doreveN Because the Rittenhouse Judge was a peach🙄 televised as well smh attention span be on zero.
I suspect this is the first time this lawyer has ever had to deal with a very very good prosecutor. It seems he’s not used to prosecutors actually working against him.
Ding ding ding exactly, he's used to the whole courtroom being golf buddies shaking hands and predetermining outcomes. I've see those small town courtrooms with my own eyes.
This prosecutor is NO GAMES at all she definitely on they heels plus she knows her shit ain’t nothing passing her unnoticed and unaddressed and she explains herself making examples and all she definitely a prosecutor and the judge is very patient.
Prosecutor is hot AF. Hot damn she is about some good ol justice for a nigga and I love that.
@@slick_will2910 👏🏽
She's invited to the cookout
I am hoping they get convicted, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they walked. This country is headed down a dark path.
Yes she is...she's on it.
I can feel the desperation from the defense
Umm, their job is to represent them to the best of their ability.
Hopefully they’d do it for you too.
@@keithb6717 The 3 defendants areMonsters, but they are entitled to legal counsel.
Yeah the defense was so desperate that they won. How is all that Miss information from CNN and MSNBC working out for you?
@@phillB Who is Miss information? Mr information’s daughter?
@@keithb6717 all you can do is try to defend the indefensible...
This trial is such a mess, but I love this prosecutor, she's a boss.
Me 2
Facts
Most def!!!
she's a bitch you misspelled that
Yeah...she is the Real Deal!!!
The best Lead Procecutor that i ever seen. She's so good on her whole closing argument!
I agree, I happened to watch her rebutttle and it was very methodical and dismantled the defenses case. Her cross examination of the killer was also very impressive.
Hands down !! sharp, focused, oriented, organized, and has very good memory profile.
She is the best.
Another amazing prosecutor was Juan Martinez from the Jodi Arias murder trial. He cross examined a defense witness and got her to reverse her testimony. He demolished other defense witnesses, including discovering one had lied about her credentials. The raw footage of the trial is on RUclips...if you are interested, check it out.
She did great during the trial. Her closing was a complete mess, but so was defense, and facts were on her side.
I don't see how the judge keeps his cool with this defense attorney. Good man. Judge I applaud your for your job on here.
He is very different from the Wisconsin right wing trumper judge.
The judge has a good demeanor, but this is what he does for a living. This behind the scenes stuff probably happens to one degree or another for every trial.
So true... he is absolutely amazing!
@ONTHEFLOW christ I missed that part lmao. Just say you don’t understand computers and go🤦♂️ The second I saw him hand Rittenhouse a bottle of water and ask if he needed to take a little break like he was his grandpa I knew the case was fucked, and I was shocked they didn’t ask him to recuse himself
@TheVolourn Rittenhouse was “not guilty”, but was far from “innocent”.
what pisses me off is that everyone has the right to fear for their life and defend themselves ,,except ...Ahmaud,,
Except Kyle or the January 6th terrorists lol !!!!!
Ahmaud only feared going back to jail so he attempted to get their gun and kill everyone there.
@@crand20033 your just making shit up get a life you freaking drunk !!!!!
@@robertbunch7829 Don't play stupid. Kyle is walking the streets a free man
@@robertbunch7829 your mom's a drunk Robert
I like how she said in her closing argument that, "IN AMERICA 🇺🇸 YOU CAN WALK OR RUN DOWN 🏃♀️ RUN DOWN THE STREET AND DON'T HAVE TO TALK TO ANYONE YOU DON'T WANT TOO". All Americans have a 5th amendment right.
This prosecutor and judge got my respect as American officials
Because it aligns with YOUR way of thinking am i right? Or are you a harvard law graduate? See where i go with this
Mine too. Anyone with morales and respect for their fellow man would.
As per Law, they did play this by the book👊
Ah so, the MOB is happy, all is well....
@@mikegrazio5376 No, it's because they are being logical and honest.
the prosecutor throughout this case has been absolutely superb. I dream of being able to be as smart on my feet as she is.
they are trying every trick in the book to try to get a mistrial, because they know that their clients are guilty
Prosecutors are all human waste.
You’re indicating that you’re not smart? If you are saying that, you’re probably correct…
@@mikeicee I agree they try to convict innocent people. Even in this case.
@@crand20033 these racists are guilty as hell may they rot in prison
The Defense is looking to add "evidence" in the close. The judge shouldn't allow this nonsense.
Just because someone is flipping through notes doesn't show he is going to introduce new evidence. If the prosecution wants to object during the closing argument they can. But you can't preemptive know what the defense is going to say.
Yeah, that's BS!
Correct. This is total bullshit! Totally of of order. No new evidence can be submitted now. The Judge has got no balls! Make a decision, you clown. Jump on the defence brief! Maybe he could go through their holiday snaps?
@@mercdragons ok they can object but does that undo the jury having ever seen the inadmissible charts or evidence it doesn’t, even if they’re instructed not to consider it. Discussing matters of the court before the jury is present is the most appropriate way to do this.
@@mercdragons
He's flipping through notes and projector slides, OF HIS CLOSING ARGUMENT. He even said that these were "things he found", and not official documents or actual testimony.
You don't introduce new pictures, diagrams, or present new information in your closing statement. This is a tactic used to purposely confuse the jury and undermine all testimony in the final moments.
The prosecution wanted it on record that she would object if new information was presented, and as she saw some of the slides, she had already noticed that there were several things she would be objecting to. This is all standard.
For example, you can't bring up that there were a bunch of 911 calls in your closing arguments if no one has testified to that fact. Or even show a new picture of how far one of the defendants was from the victim if you haven't already submitted it into evidence for the state to review.
The prosecutor is literally going against a whole squad of defense attorney’s. Man we need a name for her. She is not playing she know that killed Ahmaud in cold blood.
Prosecutor Linda Dunikoski
EXACTLY! She is a Lioness!!!
She's become a star on Twitter and other social media sites. She is known as Ms. Linda
I'm not sure they killed him in cold blood, but they certainly created a situation where they were hunting him like a dog and when he snapped back, they can't use that as a self defense claim. Disgraceful.
When you have a case as strong as hers you can be confident going against an army of defendants. Don’t matter. This case was clear as day.
The only prosecutor I actually like. She knows LAW and applies it accordingly. Got this family some justice.
Yes and she's a brilliant teacher. She's easy to listen to and helps you understand without making you feel stupid, I think.
Facts
There is no justice when all evidence isn’t revealed. The jogger shouldn’t have grabbed the gun and the guys with the gun should have called the police.
@@Casey28027 so if someone 8s standing close to you pointing a gun at you, you wouldn't try to save you life by trying to keep him from shooting you. I know most of us will but maybe you'll just let him kill you without a fight. What you didnt say but should have, is that Travis and his dad should never have brought their guns, that way Ahmaud wouldn't have any gun to reach for, now would he?
It was Amauds right to defend himself from a so called UNLAWFUL citizens arrest. They knew people's rights more than anyone. Considering their background. They knew his 5th amendment. They knew he had a right to defend himself. So you surely wouldnt Stop running from 3 white men, 2 are huge & with guns, in trucks chasing you🤔 you wouldn't try to disarm and fight for your life when you see bubba aiming at you??? Right🙄🤣
Based on his performance I would say this judge is one of the best judges in the nation. A superb showing of how the court system is supposed to work. Thank you judge!
Let's hope so. It's not over yet.
It’s a shame such a calibre of judge wasn’t evident (or overseeing) the Rittenhouse case. That guy was so biased I felt the earth shift on its axis.
@@daleglenny8253
💯
This prosecutor has been cooking these defense lawyers from start to finish
She is not telling all the facts to cover up what really happened.
You can say that again!
@@crand20033 since you se to know more than what she's presented what are the facts? Also, unless you were there when they lynched Mr. AUBREY you can't speak on that day anymore than I can
@@iamergoproxy3476 She said they didn't even have a hunch that this guy did anything wrong before chasing him. Not true. They had a suspicion because they had seen him before and Larry English described him. "I got a trespasser," Larry English, the property owner, said in a call to police after the first recorded visit made by Arbery on the night of Oct. 25, 2019
@@crand20033 that's the best you can do? Your about as good at defending them as their defense team is. Put what you just stated against what's been presented I the trial and its weak at best. They weren't enacting a citizens arrest and those words never came up til after the fact. You have the youngest of the 3 defendants admitting there was no threat thus no legal claim to self defense.
You're fishing for an excuse for these men to be found not guilty and walk away free. Idk how you can claim cover up when the village idiot himself recorded the crime that a friend of the dad buried and instructed police not to act on
I knew they lost when they were arrested. She did an outstanding job. Outstanding
She's good and the defense know it. During the cross examination of Travis, she destoryed him on everything that he said on the stand and made him back track every word.
Yea she ate his ass up,so badly the other defendants sought to make a deal,NOPE. 🙃
Too bad he wasn't the Rittenhouse Judge
@@hildeschmid8400 actually the Rittenhouse judge directed the verdict toward acquittal, in favor of defendant, to the point of badgering the prosecution.
Additionally the prosecution in the Rittenhouse case only half heartedly pursued the prosecution.
@@johnharris6837 tag teaming with the defense...per THE FIX
This judge has gotten an A+++++++ from me. The way he keeps his cool to every bs from the defence is excellent and speaks the volume about his role!
Unlike that nonsense judge who oversaw Kyle Rittenhouse.
The prosecutor rocks too
In this interaction, the judge verbally sided with the defense once and arguably used body language to signal approval of the defense’s point at another instance. Yes, the judge is calm and deliberate, which is the way it always ought to be. That’s good, but a judge doesn’t get a brownie point for fulfilling such a basic expectation. We don’t glorify a bus driver for not being on the phone while driving.
@@tantzer6113 In a corrupt country you do.
It's the Prosecution that is complaining about everything.
She caught the defense trying to sneak some stuff in! Dirty as cheater!
And the judge allowed it. Dirty as cheater
@@thejanssen6030 judge didn’t allow the extra information.
@@pucamisc right, but the only "extra" info was a title/header or 2 on one slide
@@thejanssen6030 no, he revised the one with the training protocol or whatever and questioned the hand written notes before state said it was ok. And we only saw a few slides, not the whole presentation. To least that’s how I interpreted what happend
@@pucamisc right. Changed the one, and the judge dismissed her objections about all the others
The defense attorney certainly succeeded the “How to ruin your professional reputation 101” course.
“I took some notes and therefore my notes become some sort of evidence I can show the jury during closing arguments”. LOL!
I almost get the impression the guy can't get through his closing argument without being able to do it by PowerPoint. Without it he'll forget half of what he wants to talk about and do it out of order. And that's being charitable. In truth I think he's being smarmy.
She agreed that he should be allowed to show his notes. @6:03
@@FreelanceGenie She didn’t concede that they have any value though, and in fact, they don’t. He is not only desperate, he’s making sure that the jury knows that.
This is how a judge is suppose to conduct himself. Very professional and actually listens to both sides
He should be President..no Trump no Biden
Unlike that pos in the Kyle rottenhouse trial
@@Mcgovern124 imagine thinking the judge was in the wrong when the prosecution was attacking the 5th amendment lol
Did you see him quickly put it down once the judge also noticed some things he didn’t testify to lol. This defense attorney is trying all kinds of bs. This woman attorney is paying attention to EVERYTHING with the trial and not concerned about whether or not a pastor is in the court room sitting. 🤷♂️
They really just are throwing shit together at this point..
Exactly. This judge is not the grandstanding, racist fool Rittenhouse had rooting for a fascist takeover of our country.
Look at all these lawyers in here!
@@pamelafeeney8086 i didnt realize there were anything other than white people involved in the Rittenhouse trial. You have to be a special kind of stupid to turn a white teenager justifiably shooting 3 white felons into a racial issue.
It’s hard to say if this was sneaky or sloppy. If the damn defense attorney is making his damn closing argument slides by taking pictures of his damn notes, I get the suspicion that he wasn’t prepared and/or didn’t have someone to help him prepare his slides. How hard is it to retype your notes into the laptop and format them with some damn font? Papyrus, anyone?
And I don’t mean to imply he was lazy. I think this case overworked him and he was doing the best he could. At least he wasn’t like that other schmuck defense attorney that was objecting to black pastors, or the other one that wanted to talk about how gross she thought the victim’s toes were. Can you imagine having to sit at the defense table with those other lawyers and not gag on the smell of stale whiskey, cheap perfume/cologne, and baked in racism?
@@pamelafeeney8086 This trial judge gave me the impression of everything the other judge was not.
A man was jogging along a road and was shot and killed by a vigilante. What does the US Coast Guard have to do with it? Are we going to have Seal Team Six involved next?
that's a bit of a stretch. He wasn't out jogging.
This defense attorney thinks he's slick, who tries to do this crap in the closing argument?? 🙄
Someone who knows they are going to lose, and is desperate.
Defense attorneys lol
Prosecutors do dumb shit too.
Look at Binger lol
It's called Grasping for Straws. And the woman defense attorney was just absolutely disgusting talking about the victim's toes. Wow. I hope to God that she gets disbarred somewhere along the line. Is this what we have come to in the Justice System.
She is right! She should be able to confirm all 911 calls before he amplifies them as facts before the jury.
For her to have quickly saw these things she must be able to slow down time. That was very detailed for a “quick” glance.
She must have photographic memory. It's like her brain took pictures or a video of it and she can review it in her head. The more what she sees triggers emotions the more detailed the picture or video will be
@@DTG_LOCKETT She is a special one and i don't mean that in a negative way. If i was a victim i'd want her to be my attorney.
@@Mexican_Marauder she is good. I would want this judge too
@@DTG_LOCKETT oh yeah. No nonsense
Shes a DA
The defense is salty because their losing... stop trying to introduce evidence that wasnt testified to.
@Rafael Felan But you knew what she meant...
This lady got to have her own prosecutor show I will watch every time it come on
How in the hell does your Coast Guard training gives you the right to murder someone
How is any of his coast guard and use of force training relevant?!!! He is not a law enforcement officer PERIOD! I don’t know why the state never challenged this! I am a former police officer from GA but I would never try and use any of this as a defense. How many training hours has he taken yearly after getting out of the coast guard? Once you get out of the military you’re done. There is no mandate to continue training if you want to be considered a soldier -you always are! As a former police officer, if you want to remain certified after leaving the department but no longer acting in this capacity, there is required YEARLY in-service training. To my recollection, after 3 yrs of being unemployed as a PO, you are required to complete the academy again if you want to return to active duty. This is such BS!
The first part of your statement i agree with, as for the second where you say you would not use your training as a defense?
BULLSHIT.
@@jasonwilliam2125 They said they’d never use this as a defense for the actions of the McMichaels, not that they wouldn’t use the training at all.
They can’t really challenge this to be omitted as evidence, they can only present to the jury *why* it is not a justification for certain actions.
You’re telling me someone in his health was once a coast guard ? 🤣
@@maxdslr Was he intending to show how the Coast Guard taught him to use pick up trucks and a shotgun.
Wow. Defense is trying to put in evidence not pre-approved by the judge? Does this lawyer deserve to be one.
DEFENSE is so Desperate he is willing to go to jail for a CASE that he lost the DAY they chased Ahmand down and Murdered HIM
That's a desperate defence attorney.
That Defense lawyer is trying to paint his client as a military man and give him valor he did not earn...
Us veterans don't even consider the coast guard as a military branch. Only losers go to the coast guard. Seriously. We have very little respect for them, due to their historical conduct.
@@abrahamgustavoguitiperez-m2937 maybe in your neck of the woods
The defense lawyer is trying everything in his power to get his client off and he’s desperate
It will never work for them, because Federal trial will start in February 2022 they going down.
Yep and there guilty
Well that's his job not that I would want it !!!
@@robertbunch7829 They get paid even if they lose.
@@crand20033 they do indeed !!!
The jury should know what the defendant said at the time - not the lawyers' interpretation. This is shameful
If the prosecution is allowed to do it then so is the defense. That's the law.
@@hesoneshot5975 But the prosecution just reads off their own notes, they don't blow them up and show them to the jury as some official item, that's literally what evidence is for.
@@hesoneshot5975 they're not so... you're making an argument from ignorance 🙄
Exactly because then it becomes the lawyer testifying for the witness. Jury needs only to know what was on the defendant's mind and intentions
@@hesoneshot5975 the prosecutors are interpreting the law and the actions based off the case law, the actual law and the defendants testimony during cross examination
No, the defense can’t show the jury his notes from the testimony or his diagrams that he drew himself and were never entered into evidence and authenticated by a witness. That’s like the defense attorney testifying. I can’t believe he would try to make it seem like this is a normal thing to do. It isn’t. This whole thing was ridiculous.
he legit just ruled in the video he could so long as it was directly connected with things that were entered into evidence or that were testified to, idk what the hell u were watching but thats legit what he just said. lol
State is nitpicking. These are just visual aids to help him in his presentation, not "evidence". He's not passing them off to the jury as indisputable facts - just as visual representations of or aids to his verbal argument. Why would the State object to a neighborhood sign being used as a header on a PowerPoint? Why would the State object to a visual outline for an argument? He's already going to say that these are the things his client said on the stand. It's not like the information on the board is different from what's coming out of his mouth. She's grasping at straws and being more malicious than is required.
The defense already has an uphill battle. No need to 'object' at every slide over things that are irrelevant.
Seems people know little about how trials work….how evidence submission and final arguments work etc…
Did you see all the crap the prosecution tried to pull to try to pin something on Rittenhouse? Lawyers will do anything to win.
The prosecutor had no reasonable closing argument and she showed how flustered she was by assuming the defense attorney was trying to sneak in "new evidence" for his closing remarks when all he did was use notes he took during the trial..lol. He did an awesome job.
These defense attorneys will never get a job again. His decorum in a court room is no way to conduct yourself, either.
How is this even in trial? You cant chase someone down then claim self defense lmfao.
Hmmmm
It only happens in America.
Same reason why kneeling had humans so upset.
If that were true Travon Martin's killer would be in jail. The system is broken...but more than that, too many of our fellow countrymen are absolute scumbags.
Trayvon Martin would like to have a word with you...if he could.
To bad the cost guard didn't teach him how not to be a horrible human being...
A lot of racists gravitate to coast guard and border patrol jobs. A former border patrol agent did a special (you can find here on RUclips) about how her job basically had her racially profiling people all day and made her feel like a Nazi. Its no different with police.
Y’all racist
@@MyAb111 🎻
You lefties are pathetic
I concur. How can they say he knows how to de escalate a situation…..When he shot the man three times? Ok then why not leave your gun in the truck and try to subdue him? Come on! There were two men there!
This prosecutor is AMAZING!!! I am soo proud of her no matter WHAT verdict the jury of peers returns.
This prosecutor is my dream woman bruh. This is what you call a bad woman. Not Beyonce or none of that BS.
WORD.
Good judge actually! Calm respectful and duly dedicated to fairness and justice. Wish all judges were so wise.
Indeed
Your bias is showing
@@cheyduke9430 more likely, yours is showing
@@cheyduke9430 how so?
Why can't you be specific about your claim?
He’s actually been great.
A prosecutor actually doing their jobs... Now let's see what this 11 to 1 white jury does in Georgia
Why bring up their race? Are you a bigot?
As opposed to what? An 11 to 1 black jury?
@@cheyduke9430 there were 8 potential jurors who were disqualified off the basis of race and the judge even admitted to the discrimination behind the decision yet only allowed 1 of 12 jurors to be black for the trial of people who murdered a man whose race makes up around 25% of the population in that area. The misrepresentation of the demographic coupled with the history of injustice during southern trials with black people involved is why this is an issue.
@@cheyduke9430 however, since the defense didn't have much to work with and the guilt is obvious to anyone who isn't a bigot then we are just waiting for the words "GUILTY". Can't claim self defense if you admit there was no threat, never said in the moment anything about a citizen's arrest, didn't know what he was guilty of (just assumed he did something). You can't look at this trial and say the prosecution failed to make its case and if the jury doesn't find the defendants guilty then what factor can you attribute that to?
@@cheyduke9430 oh yeah because Georgia is a beacon of racial equality... Isn't that what the judge said? Gtfoh
She’s on point!!!!!
This is a WAY better judge then the other one.
NO NO NO, his past training has zero to do with the trial.
Even tempered judge, i can see how he became a judge.
I’m so proud of the prosecutor ,she did amazing .
The Judge is a perfect example of a Judge. The Prosecutor did a great job!
She should bring in a huge poster with the quote of what the defendant said over arberys body then too.
Love it! Great idea!!
Unfortunately, because defendant Bryan did not testify in his own defense, and he was the one who claimed to have heard Travis mcmichael utter a racial slur over Arbery's body, the state was not allowed to ask Mcmichael about the slur.
The judge and defense attorney object to any political slurs commentary by the defendant. So the prosecutor couldn't use it. However, the judge only want evidences related to the incident.
No political stand, no emotional feelings. Just hard evidences of what is happening. An impartial judge.
The defense team is so desperate and trying to use all kinds of tactics! Travis stupidly testified against himself. Ahmaud was no threat to neither one of them that day. Their arrogance and hatred killed Ahmaud.
@Ken Blades ok genius ... Or should I say chicken shit...somebody trying to shoot me your damn right I'm gonna grab at that barrel ..try not being so ignorant....troll
Yeah they are going to jail for sure.
@@johnsonsandra8069 umm... he is trying to get attention pls don't mind him
@Ken Blades he died because two strangers, one armed with a shotgun decided to play vigilante and shot him.
You can't say what you would or wouldn't have done in his shoes.
But psychologically there's an instance to grab at offending weapons in a conflict. That is fact.
Whether that hurt or helped him is immaterial because they were looking for an excuse to shoot him.
They're both going to jail regardless.
@Ken Blades According to you he committed suicide? You racist shit.
The defense attorney is what I would call "Slumming it" slipping in alternative facts that have not even been spoken about yet. Truly moves from a desperate defense.
Why am I not surprised that your vocabulary also revolves around Trump...
@@TheBerylknight And I'm not surprised of your comment. My comment is up for attack. So jump all over it. I have a moral compass, and a healthy balanced mind set. Your move.
@@tracybird8668 Sounds like your mind is balanced around Trump to me.
Boy this prosecutor continues to impress me. You go and give him hell ma'am. I would want that lady on my team anytime, anywhere.
I'm going to make a long story short, my parents always told me if I feel unsafe and in harms way run for my life and that's exactly what he did.
Did they tell you run away towards the idiots and to grab their guns too?
Making the long story short is a lie.
@@keithb6717 .. she said what she said and she's correct. You pray the kkk gets off
@@Hottestsummer If BLM gets away with it, then so should the KKK according to your logic. 🙄
@@keithb6717 he was trying to get the gun that he was being threatened with off him Duh 🙄
@@keithb6717 it's shameful how you seem to be so comfortable with the taking of a life for no good reason. You can't hunt someone down like an animal and then blame him for trying to protect himself.
The defense is literally trying to prove those murderers had a right to act as official police. All this police n military ish is irrelevant bc none of them were active
Yes! Quite apart from the fact that they don't seem to have absorbed any of the training - like the sanctity of the 5th amendment or de-escalation techniques, just to start with.
They are vigilantes or militia
Are you saying that you shouldn't be allowed to use your gun, if someone rushes you and hits you? I guess Rittenhouse should have just taken the beating and not shot people that rushed him, right?
@@jacoblewis4006 Rittenhouse is a separate case. As for this case, if you chase a guy for five minutes and he finds himself exhausted and blocked in, being threatened with guns and the police, yes, you deserve anything that he does. Sure, shoot him if you like, but you gotta rot in jail for it. It's called "consequences".
@@jacoblewis4006 Yes, if you've harassed and chased and attacked someone for the last 5 minutes, for absolutely no good reason, and they grab your gun in self defence... you do NOT have the moral or legal right to kill them. These guys are violent criminal scum and they're gonna rot, just like the violent criminal scum who harassed and chased and attacked Rittenhouse. The biggest difference between Kyle and Ahmaud is that Ahmaud's self-defence attempt failed while Kyle's worked.
She is on her feet...she is whooping his ass. #GO GIRL
The Defense knows exactly what they’re doing. They are squirrelly. Just like their clients.
It’s chaos when you have pretend cops that feel they are judge and jury.
And executioner
There are many on the right who believe everyone should carry weapons and impose their idea of justice on everyone else.
@@itomba and it’s going to end in tears :((
@Dan Reardon Please clarify, not sure if you are just incompetent at writing or a right wing cultist who has bought into every bit of disinformation promoted by the media and politicians.
@Dan Reardon And yet you have no problem repeating right wing talking points promoted by the media and the Republican Party.
The prosecutor types up her summary of testimony, whereas the defense wants to show the jury his scrawled notes. Hilarious!
Hilarious why?
Some people just do their homework. Not the defense it appears, scribbled Notes. Why didn't you guys get a Get Rich Go Fund me like the Rottenhouse Team?
@@justsaying3729 🤣
@@tantzer6113 Be aisle they were lazy and trifling in their visual presentations. 🤣
Beavis & Butthead defended by Beavis & Butthead🥴🥴🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️ guily
Sadly under the circumstances. This prosecutor is what all people in her field should be like. She definitely needs a movie or a case study for future lessons students. She did very well.
The defense was trying to introduce things related to his character to make him look good and present Travis as a good law enforcement type officer, instead of a racist murderer!
The objective is to distract the court from the blood covered hands of his defendant, the testimony of the personality of defendant by the defense attorneys was not relevant and was not the place of the attorneys to submit to the court ,the prosecution over looked this and allowed the defense attorney's to get away with this.🙃
@@johnharris6837 - it’s not over. She has a 2 hour rebuttal in the morning @ 08:30🙂
@@toniat8278 Yeah it'll be easy to rip him apart in the morning.
They opened up there client to get publicly destroyed by force of hand due to the defense using that on closing.
@@johnharris6837 Tomorrow we will see. Now she has free reign to destroy that mans character as a means to rebuttal the "personality"
@@cryptomoonshots73 - i agree😃
The defense is basically TSATWTSWS (throwing shxt at the wall to see what sticks. The prosecution is definitely on their "A" game so that bs ain't working
It almost worked for Trump. Never discount the good old kitchen sink. With anotherJudge (Rittenhouse), it could have worked.
@@mutongoria That other judge would have pretty much been the best friend for those three cowardly thugs who murdered an unarmed man in cold blood when he wasn't doing things like attacking the media for doing their jobs. Thankfully in this trial, neither the judge, the prosecutor or the jury gave those three an easy way out. They committed a terrible crime and were rightfully found guilty of that crime.
Yea but that pros is no joke she’s bad quick and on her feet
Her skill nearly makes her kind if hot and milfy.
@@LeeePowers wait what 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
bad in a michael jackson bad is good kind of way?
@@anactualcloud Michael Jackson bad
💯💯💯💪🏻
Don't you dare put this man's inhumanity on the backs of the great men and women of the Coast Guards. Last time I checked, they treated all people in need with dignity and actually saved lives
💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯FACT👏👏👏❤️❤️❤️❤️🇺🇲🇺🇲
I can’t believe this lawyer, he feels entitled to use his own notes he wrote as “evidence”
that were written in front of the jury anyways and were summarizing testimonies which is completely okay lol
@@supermudkip356 He claims they were. They were never entered as evidence.
@@Grammy52 They don't have to be entered as evidence. You really don't know what a closing statement is? Both sides get up there and present their biased version of their notes/views on the evidence. Why would their notes or views need to be entered as evidence? The judge disagreed with that objection. Even the prosecutor, after she realized what she had just blindly objected to like a moron, changed her mind. You somehow know better than all three of them? Brilliant.
@@thejanssen6030 Quiet, fool.
@@DrakeOola too much reality for you?
This guy is like a cartoon character of a shady lawyer
crooked lawyers crooked clients
This is the kind of judge I would want if ever I ended up in court. Calm temperament, fair rulings, actually listens to arguments...
I'm seeing a wise and humble Judge" He's been fair throughout the proceedings. And calm" He goes off his learning and experience throughout his career. This Judge is not persuaded by others, or bend to peer pressure. Like most weak judges are in this country, by bringing their outside influences into the court. This Judge go off of what he learned and study, and not by what people tell him to do....
Just imagine how different things might have been if Kyle Rittenhouse had this Judge.
@@williamwalcott8808 what? lol rittenhouse verdict and this verdict were both right.
Probably wouldn't have gone differently. If you look at the self-defense law in the state, it was unlikely to end up with a different verdict.
@@williamwalcott8808 Sure... I guess you didn't watch the trial if that's what you think. How is your echo chamber?
@@PapeySapote Sadly, true. There is no law against being an interfering moron. I honestly think Rittenhouse, and the rioters should be punished for the actions leading up to the deaths. Actions any reasonable person could see the potential of. Same for all riots and insurrections.
This defense team has used one line of bullshit thinking after another in this trial. I’m so thankful that hasn’t let this trial devolve in the shit show the defense wants this to be.
Wish he had been at Kyle's trial.
Innocent, righteous verdict about to be rendered. Brace for reality. This case ought not have been brought to trial. So many levels of law enforcement said there was no case here. Kyle Rittenhouse 101 self-defense. Have you had the Rittenhouse drink yet? Three shots followed by chaser. That's what I had the day he was set free righteousness.
@@jamesharris184 dang what horrible person you are…
@@jamesharris184 Three hots and a cot until they are retirement age minimum. The older one will die in prison. They had no evidence of theft. No No trespassing sign. Therefore no reason to detain. They will die in prison like the murderous hateful beings they are.
@@jamesharris184 Rittenhouse was innocent based on the written law but is still a wannabe soldier who won't amount to anything. This case is open and shut and they will be found guilty, hope you enjoy it.
Even if the jury found them not guilty (hopefully not the case), this judge shows the definition of what fair and impartial is. Cut the cap and get to the FACTS!!!
I've got news for you. The facts show they are innocent. This was a cop with 30 years of experience responsible for watching that house. There was a boat and a lived in camper on the property. He had been there multiple times during the construction. Even out to the dock. They knew he was black. He was on probation and didn't want go back to jail. "I got a trespasser," Larry English, the property owner, said in a call to police after the first recorded visit made by Arbery on the night of Oct. 25, 2019
@@crand20033 I got news for you David. You're a sick old racist.
@@crand20033 a dumbass they guilty af and also racist af just like you. Enough said.
@@crand20033, wow, you guys will defend any crazy racist murderers, huh?
@@crand20033 👈🥱💤🥱you allwhite?
Kudos to the Judge and the Prosecutor.
This prosecutor, she's good. Intelligent, professional and to the point of evidence.
His defense 😳 😤 is crazy, the man is running away and has ABSOLUTELY NO DUTY or OBLIGATION to stop/ be interviewed or detained by a Civilian. WTH .
@Dan Reardon 🤦🏻♂️ so if two strangers followed you and said you’re under citizens arrest you’d stop and comply? You’re gonna end up in another country turning tricks some day with that attitude. Lol
@Dan Reardon you can't chase someone down who was unarmed when you are armed then claim self defense !!!
@Dan Reardon what charge were they gonna charge Ahmaud with seeing as they only saw him running down the street didn’t know where he was coming from, where he was going or why he was even running. At the police station Travis McMichael had a hour to write down exactly what happened that day and said nothing about the neighbor pointing but now all of a sudden that’s his main point and then keeps stuttering saying he wrote one thing but meant something else, yeah right buddy
@Dan Reardon Where was this citizens arrest bs during the rittenhouse trial? They were trying to disarm a child with an assualt weapon, look how that turned out
@Dan Reardon you're under citizens arrest, wait where you are and at my convenience I'll be there to notify law enforcement... if you try to leave you could be shot in self defense.
Sound reasonable? Why didn't they just take pictures and follow him for law enforcement officials without their guns?
I’m glad I’m out the streets, would never want this prosecutor on my azz…..
Notice a pattern of incompetence on the part of the defense attorneys
That's new evidence and the defense is tryna be slick by adding in new stuff.
Also, putting up the U.S. Coast Guard Logo (despicable) when I'm quite sure he was not acting on their behalf or sanctioned by them during this crime.
So you didn’t like it when the prosecutor in the Rittenhouse trial did it either?
@@Alvan81 Actually the Coast Guard put him out.
@@keithb6717 n map
@@keithb6717 "Whataboutism": When you have _no_ argument, but wanna post *something..* 🙄
This prosecutor is great!
The defense attorneys have an uphill battle to convince the jury of their clients' "innocence". Looks like they're scrambling to find additional support for their case.
They are not innocent. They hunted down, harassed, and murdered a black neighbor. Guilty. Reverse the color of killers and victim ...
Defense never stood a chance but their still doing their job...why is everyone acting like they should just not argue anything or try certain tactics and let their clients go to jail 🤦♂️. It would be wild west again and wed be hanging people all over the place.
@@tclyde865 I've only been on one jury, many years ago, and don't usually watch court TV so I don't know what "normal" court procedure looks like. It seems to me that the number of times the defense calls for a mistrial is excessive. Watching Travis McMichael's attorney in closing arguments yesterday was so cringe worthy I had to turn it off (maybe it got better?). He started off praising his Coast Guard training....like it was a defense? What part of his training taught him to shout "stop or I'll blow your effing head off" while pointing a shotgun at someone?
@@tclyde865 Seems like folks don't want defendants they don't like to have a fair trail or anything resembling a defense. Myself I want every even half way legit chance for ALL defendants to be able to present a defense. In fact I would prefer the deck be stacked in favor of the defense in almost every trail. I want the prosecution to have to really PROVE the defendants guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. Now based upon what I think I know of the Aubry/ McMichaels thing I believe the Jury came to the correct conclusion. But I still think this Prosecutor is being very Petty and trying to stack the deck against the defense. Not the way it's supposed to be.
@@bethgriesauer3825 yeah maybe you’re right, but the case has to be treated by the defence as if they are innocent. After all it’s not 100% certain what happened. Certainly looks it though I will say.
If I've learned anything the past few years, it's that law school must not be all that difficult
This woman is a force not to be reckoned with. You want to avoid being a criminal or your feeling like misbehaving... think of this lady and your actions and thoughts will be set straight so that you never ever have to sit in court to face this woman
These three are guilty. No way around that.
None of them are police officers. They are private citizens who never personally observe another private citizen commit a crime. Yet, left the comfort of their home with guns, hit the private citizen with their pick up truck, got out of their pick up on scene and shot the unarmed citizen. After that, the father called the DA J.Jonson from the scene and the DA told them to go home and wash the blood and gun residue off their person.
I Also note that they never called the police during the so-called citizens arrest.
Tyrants and Thugs cover for each to continue to violate citizens right to pad the pockets
Is all that true? Sorry I didn’t watch the trial. I already assumed it was a lynching.
@@patientzero5685 It basically was, yeah.
This defense attorney is rude and an argumentative little child who is talking back to the judge. That judge had serious patience.
I was a Cub Scout in second grade, so I'm qualified now to detain anyone I choose and engage in armed citizens arrests even without any evidence of crime and if any of these people I detain and arrest die from my gun I was only defending myself like they taught me in Webelos.
The defense is sloppy
This prosecutor is a badass, you know what he's trying to do is, make it like these guys were doing their patriotic duty, to justify the stopping of the victim.
On the basis of 'suspicion'. Sickening
@@iegal2526 exactly!!!
Hey just a couple of neighborhood watchers trying to help the neighbors.
@@crand20033 than call the police, don't go running out with trucks and guns and recording it, that alone says they were looking for something to happen!!! I get so sick of people like you justifying murder, just because their white and I'm white, a murderer is a murderer, PERIOD!!!!
@@crand20033 and another thing, a policemen told me something a while back. If you're experiencing a lot of break ins, in your neighborhood, don't always look to the stranger, it's probably the neighbor who waves at you everyday, who else would know when you go and come everyday?
This is exactly why elected state judge positions are some of the MOST important choices we make when we go and vote. Well done Alabama for putting this man in this position.
Um. They're in Georgia aren't they?
U spelled Georgia wrong
Yeah…..They’re in Georgia.
Lol we’re in Gods name did you come up with Alabama, the case is being tried in Georgia I swear you can’t make this stuff up if you tried.😂😂
@@nygrl6102 Same difference 🙄
It's clear the defense attorney planned on making it seem like his client was an upstanding citizen, ex-Coast Guard, lives in a nice community, etc. Like that would really help justify his murdering of an innocent un-armed Black man.
She’s Good At What She Do
She sure is!
DOES, not DO. Tense is incorrect, my dear man.
@@mjremy2605 it’s been 8 months since you needlessly corrected the grammar of the original commenter. Have you gotten over yourself yet?