Budget Filmmaking:Best Wide prime lens Review-Panasonic Leica 12mm F1.4 VS Olympus Zuiko 17mm F1.2
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 окт 2024
- You want to buy the best wide angle lens for Micro Four Thirds, but can't decide? You wan't the best filmmmaking footage with native lenses on your tiny crop censor?
You want to finally get some respect from society? This video may help you on the first two. So sit back, relax and watch the Leica 12mm f1.4 vs Olympus 17mm F1.2 review.
Gear Used:
-Panasonic Leica 12mm f1.4
-Olympus Zuiko 17mm F1.2
-Zeiss Otus 55mm f1.4
-Zeiss Milvus 25mm F1.4
Panasonic Gh5s
Panasonic G9
Metabones Speedbooster XL
Super Soaker CPS 2000
-Super Soaker Monster XL
Music:
J.R.S. Schattenberg
www.youtube.co...
Into the Moss
Vallis
Colossus
-Rising Fires 
Наука
![KSI - Thick Of It (feat. Trippie Redd) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/At8v_Yc044Y/mqdefault.jpg)
This was great! And I’m a huge fan. This channel is very underrated. Funny! I just recently borrowed my friends 12m 1.4 to do gimbal work for a short film. I was impressed how much I liked it over my 17mm 1.2 and I’m the guy that only does with Oly Pro / Oly Zuiko lenses.
Cheers
Your good taste in content and preference in lenses shows why humans are and should the dominant species on this planet.
And yes, I primarily bought the 12mm f1.4 for gimbal work. But It also looking great on static shots is a nice bonus.
Nice comparison. Of all the lenses I've owned. The PL12, 25/45 Pro and PL200/f2.8 stood out. The PL12 for it's sunstars which are stunning, Olympus Pro lenses for their bokeh and the PL200, for it's overall rendering.
Indeed! The reputation that m4/3 has no premium glass, should be put to rest by now.
Thank you again for the comparison, me and one other guy requested... Hope your deer farm is a prosperous endeavor
Hopefully maybe a couple of Leica or Olympus lenses will be purchased soon.
Well, Oggie has been chasing those Small deers with ketchup and a spork.
Hilarious and Brilliant!! Camera Conspiracies recommended this. And it is now officially the best RUclips channel ever. So long all others.
I very much appreciate and respect your excellent taste!
...I also was wondering why I suddenly got more than 2 views today, so I should leave Camera Conspiracies a thank you post.
Fantastic idea. I hvbw been looking for just this comparison to buy one - which is weather sealed and has below F2 for low light night shooting.
These are indeed two good options in the native micro four thirds mount.
Thank you for this super comparison, it is exactly what I've been thinking about for ages. I already have the 17 Pro, and have been considering the 12 for a long time. Tim Kellner made some beautiful work with the 12 and a GH5, and Albert Fasth did some equally beautiful work with the 17 Pro and GH5/G9. I also have the Olympus 12mm f2, and the extra light gathering and close focus of the Panasonic is very appealing, but getting the Panasonic is quite the expense on top of what I've already spent. It's great to know that the Olympus f1.2 Pro primes are close to Zeiss in image quality, too. I've shot numerous interviews with the Pro primes and always been pleased with how they render.
It's always tricky if the extra light is worth the extra cash. Ironically the 12mm f1.4 saved me money with its light capability, by not having to buy a Zeiss milvus 18mm, which on my gh5s+speed booster would have been a 21mm and an f3 full frame, compared to the leicas f2.5 at 22mm in full frame terms on the gh5s.
The voigtlander 10.5mm f0.95 is quite tempting though.
@@thatweirdfilmmaker4521 By the way, I'm one of the two people who requested this comparison, so thank you very much, I appreciate it!
“Taxes for money laundering” 😂
Subscribed.
The 17mm being brighter than the 12mm at a given aperture is interesting. That is known as the T-stop, right? The difference is quite noticeable, even though they both have 15 elements. I am looking for a prime for photographing in low light conditions, so to see the 17mm's light gathering capability demonstrated so clearly is very useful.
Indeed, the actual light measured would be the T-Stop.
If low lighting is your primary focus , then the 17mm pro definitely is the way to go. Interestingly, the 17mm and 45mm of the f1.2 pro line let's in a tad more might too than the 25mm.
Alternatively, you could also go the voightlander route at f.95, but it's all manual focus.
Good lens just different. I sometimes say I have a favorite lens like the Olympus 75mm f1.8 but other times my favorite lens is what is best for the job.
Very hard to shoot boudoir with the Olympus 75mm f1.8 for boudoir I like my Olympus 12-40mm f2.8.
Yes, very often my favorite angles determine my favorite lenses.
ANSOULTELY UNREAL REVIEW THANKS SO MUCH
Thank you! It's my service to our collapsing society.
Great humor!😂 Earned a sub!
Thank you, that is why you have good taste and style.
Hahaha, hilarious!
"We dont do smeary sigma shit"
This killed me...!
That's a cool video!
Does the lens make a lot of noise from the motor when it's focusing?
I'd appreciate an answer.
Greetings! No the motors on both lenses are fairly quiet. Prime lenses tend to have quiter motors than the zooms.
Thank you.
Have a good day!
Camera Conspiracies sent me here!
He is a good and honorable man. 👍
Fantastic 👍😂
Hey what about olympus 2.8 zooms for cinema movies
He has already made videos about the 12-40 and 40-150 Olympus lenses.
Yes, 2 reviews are already on the channel. But to summarize, they work well if you don't need shallow bokeh.
12 f1.4 vs 12 f2 Olympus?
With the Olympus 12mm f2 being too slow, and not a Pro line, its unfortunately no contest against the Leica 12mm F1.4.
What are your impressions of the GH5-S you use?
Well, I have used it since 2018/19, and I'm not planning getting a new camera body anytime soon. It's probably the best review I can give it. Plus Good/unique lenses simply affect the footage more into the right direction for the money.
9mm vs 12mm
The 12mm 1.4 has the higher build quality being metal, and physical features like af/m switch, and physical aperture ring. I can't say anything about image quality since I haven't seen them next to each other.
But Unless the 9mm focal is needed, I would go 12mm. And if 9mm is needed, I would look at the Olympus 7mm zoom instead.
I don't have the 12mm yet, but the Panasonic 9mm is a fantastic lens. It is sharp as heck, and has pleasant bokeh wide open. 18mm equivalent can be a bit wide for some situations, it depends on the look and effect you want, and/or the situations you are shooting - I love 18mm for capturing indoor scenes like churches, temples, libraries, even normal places like restaurants and hotels. 24mm equivalent is a wonderful walkaround focal length, wide enough to capture a scene but not so wide that objects in the outer thirds distort significantly. The image quality of the Panasonic 9mm is not an issue.
Kill the distracting and loud background music. When will you people ever learn